Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 4 cited by

Classical Black Hole Probes of UV Scales

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Classical black holes encode UV scales they never see.

desk verdict Careful asymptotic computations and one clever bottom-up test make this worth refereeing, but the central interpretive claim — that two-derivative black holes know the species scale — remains unproven because the match happens at the scale where the two-derivative expansion breaks down. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03514 v2 pith:VVXR3LAT submitted 2025-02-05 hep-th

José Calderón-Infante , Matilda Delgado , Yixuan Li , Dieter Lust , Angel M. Uranga This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th MSC 83E5083E3083C5781T30 PACS 04.70.-s11.25.-w
keywords blackholeattractorsspeciesscaleBPSholesinfinitedistancelimitsKaluza-KleinemergentstringUV/IRmixingtwo-derivativeeffectiveaction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether low-energy, two-derivative black hole solutions can reveal ultraviolet scales. It studies families of extremal charged black holes whose attractor mechanism pushes moduli to infinite distance in moduli space, picks their smallest members, and compares horizon size with the species scale and the Kaluza-Klein scale. It finds that in 5d M-theory and 4d type II compactifications these minimal classical black holes either match the species scale or the KK scale, and proves that in the asymptotic limits they are never parametrically smaller than the species length. In a 9d bottom-up model, black holes that would be smaller than the species length disappear once the truncated axion is restored, which the paper reads as evidence that the bound selects effective field theories with consistent quantum-gravity completions.

What carries the argument

The attractor mechanism and the entropy function. For BPS black holes, the attractor equations fix the moduli at the horizon as functions of the charges by extremizing the central charge, giving $S \sim |Z|^2$ and a horizon length $\ell_{\rm BH} \sim S^{1/(d-2)}$; choosing charge hierarchies that push a modulus to an infinite-distance boundary yields the smallest such black hole. The comparison scale is the species scale $\Lambda_s$, defined as the scale at which curvature-squared corrections become comparable to Einstein gravity or as the scale set by the lightest tower of states. The same entropy-function formalism handles non-supersymmetric extremal black holes in the 9d example, and convex hull diagrams organize the exponential decay rates of the black hole scale versus the species scale.

What would settle it

Take the D0/D4 family of STU-model black holes in a Type IV limit and compute the first higher-derivative correction to the entropy from the curvature-squared term whose coefficient defines the species scale. If the corrected horizon length differs from $\Lambda_s^{-1}$ by a power of $t$ rather than an O(1) factor as $t \to \infty$, the classical match is an artifact; alternatively, if any UV-complete string compactification admits a finite classical BPS black hole whose horizon is parametrically smaller than the species length in an infinite-distance limit, the proposed bound fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper argues that classical black hole solutions built from only the two-derivative effective action already encode UV information. The smallest BPS black holes whose attractor values push moduli to infinite-distance boundaries of moduli space have horizon lengths that asymptotically match the species scale, defined as the energy scale at which quantum gravitational effects become important, or the Kaluza-Klein scale in certain limits; in all cases considered, the classical horizon is never parametrically smaller than the species length. In the 9d example, a bottom-up theory with the axion removed admits black holes that violate this bound, but those solutions do not survive when the axion is restored, suggesting that such a violation flags an EFT that cannot be UV-completed.

Load-bearing premise

The classical two-derivative horizon radius, computed from the BPS attractor entropy, remains the physically meaningful black hole size in the regime where the horizon approaches the species scale, even though higher-curvature and quantum corrections are set aside by the paper.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The species scale and related KK scales can be extracted from classical horizon sizes, without computing higher-derivative corrections.
  • In consistent string compactifications, classical BPS black holes are never parametrically smaller than the species length in asymptotic infinite-distance limits, giving a concrete testable bound on effective field theories.
  • The scale reproduced by minimal black holes distinguishes the type of limit: species scale in decompactification and emergent string limits, but KK scale in Type III decompactification limits.
  • The match persists up to O(1) factors in the interior of moduli space in 5d and 4d N=4 examples, so the effect is not purely asymptotic.
  • The 9d axion-truncation example shows that violations of the species-length bound can signal missing fields required for a UV completion.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the bound is universal, minimal classical horizon sizes give a cheap diagnostic for whether a candidate EFT can be UV-completed, applicable before any higher-derivative computation is available.
  • The 9d example suggests that axionic couplings play a structural role in forbidding sub-species-scale classical black holes; one could test whether such couplings are necessary for the bound to hold in generic dilatonic EFTs.
  • The interior-of-moduli-space match ties the species scale, defined via curvature-squared coefficients, to classical horizon data, implying a nontrivial relation between topological data of the Calabi-Yau that the paper notes but leaves open.
  • A natural extension is to neutral or non-BPS black holes; if the pattern persists, the two-derivative action alone would be a window onto UV scales beyond charged supersymmetric systems.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies extremal black hole solutions in two-derivative supergravity truncations of string/M-theory and asks whether the size of the smallest such black holes ("minimal black holes") tracks the species scale or other UV scales in infinite-distance limits of moduli space. It finds that in 5d M-theory compactifications, minimal BPS black holes asymptotically match the species scale in both decompactification and emergent-string limits, and semiquantitatively in the interior of moduli space. In 4d N=2 type II compactifications, the match depends on the limit type: Type IV and Type II limits give species-scale-sized black holes, while Type III limits give KK-scale-sized black holes; Section 3.3 provides lower bounds excluding parametrically smaller BPS black holes in single-modulus limits. The paper also constructs a 9d bottom-up model from a truncation of maximal supergravity and shows that black holes there can be parametrically smaller than the species length, but that these solutions do not survive when the axion is restored. Interpretive sections argue for an emergent origin of the effect and give microstate-counting arguments.

Significance. If the interpretation is correct, the paper establishes a new UV/IR mixing phenomenon whereby classical two-derivative black hole solutions know about the species scale. The strength of the paper lies in the range of examples studied and the explicit asymptotic scaling computations, which are clean and internally consistent. The lower-bound proofs in Section 3.3 use standard attractor equations and Dirac quantization and are plausible. The 9d bottom-up model provides a concrete, falsifiable test of the proposed swampland criterion. The paper is also honest about its limitations, repeatedly stressing that it uses naive two-derivative solutions and heuristic microscopic arguments. The central caveat is that the comparison between the classical horizon size and the species scale occurs at the very scale where the two-derivative approximation is breaking down, so the physical interpretation requires further justification.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 1, p.3; Eqs. (2.30), (3.16)] The paper's central claim compares the classical horizon length l_BH, computed from the two-derivative attractor entropy, with the species length, yet the species scale is defined as the scale at which curvature-squared corrections become O(1). The comparison is therefore made exactly in the regime where the two-derivative approximation is unreliable. Since the paper explicitly sets aside quantum stretched horizons and higher-curvature corrections (Section 1, p.3), the match could be an artifact of extrapolating the classical formula outside its domain of validity. The authors should either provide evidence from the existing literature (e.g., the uplift analysis in ref. [81]) that the classical horizon length is not shifted by O(1) factors at this scale, or clearly restrict the claim to the two-derivative classical solution and explain what physical conclusion can be drawn from that restricted statement.
  2. [Section 4.2.1, Eqs. (4.10), (4.19)-(4.24)] The relation between the canonically normalized moduli and the moduli-space distance appears inconsistent. From Eq. (4.10) with Q1~Q2~Q and Q3 fixed, one obtains Δφ̂ ≃ -(√7/2) log Q and Δχ̂ ≃ (1/2) log Q, so the total field distance is sqrt((Δφ̂)^2 + (Δχ̂)^2) ≃ √2 log Q, not D_φ ≃ sqrt(2/7) log Q as stated in Eq. (4.20). Since Eqs. (4.21)-(4.24) use this D_φ to quote the exponential decay rate, the claimed agreement with the 9-to-11 decompactification rate needs to be re-examined with the correct distance normalization.
  3. [Abstract and Section 3.3] The abstract claims that "in all cases the classical black holes are never smaller than the species length in the different asymptotic limits." The proof in Section 3.3 covers single-modulus limits in 4d N=2 compactifications; the 5d analysis does not contain a lower-bound proof, and the 9d bottom-up model contains violations that are argued to signal inconsistency of the truncated theory. The "all cases" statement is broader than what is actually proven. Please qualify the statement to the cases analyzed, or prove the remaining cases.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The sentence "These observations suggests that the two-derivative action may encode information about relevant UV scales" contains a subject-verb agreement error: "suggests" should be "suggest."
  2. [Section 2.3, Figure 2 caption] The caption states that the black hole size is "re-scaled by the factor in equation (2.34)", but it is not clear whether l_BH is multiplied by that factor or Λ_s^{-1} is; please clarify the normalization convention.
  3. [Section 3.1.2] In the paragraph introducing the D0/D2/D4/D6-brane black holes, "highligthed" is a typo and should read "highlighted."
  4. [Section 4.3.2, Eq. (4.36)] The third species vector is labeled Z1 again; it should be labeled Z3 to match the tower index.
  5. [Section 5.2] The notation for the number of species is inconsistent: the text first uses Ns and then Nsp for the same quantity √(c_L q_0). Please use one symbol throughout.
  6. [References] Reference [107] is listed as "To appear" without a preprint number or year; please complete it if possible.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: black-hole sizes and species scales are computed from independent inputs, with only harmless O(1) calibration choices.

full rationale

The central comparison is not circular: l_BH (or S) is computed from the two-derivative attractor equations, i.e. charges and triple intersection numbers, while the species scale Λ_s in the same limits is taken from independent UV data: tower masses (M_KK, emergent string scale) or the curvature-squared Wilson coefficient F1. For example, in Eq. (2.22) the black-hole scale Λ_BH ∼ Q_x^{-1/3} ∼ e^{-Δ/√3} is compared with Λ_s ∼ Y^{-1/2} from Eq. (2.11); the two scalings agree only after solving the attractor equations, and neither quantity is defined in terms of the other. Similarly, the Type II STU result S ∼ q0 ∼ t in Eq. (3.54) is matched against F1 ∼ Λ_s^{-2} ∼ t in Eq. (3.16), with the two quantities derived from different structures: charges and intersections on one side, topological string free energy on the other. The lower-bound proofs in Sec. 3.3 use charge quantization and the form of the prepotential rather than the value of the species scale; they are therefore independent constraints. The O(1) normalizations in Secs. 2.3 and 3.4 are explicit calibration choices (Eq. (2.34) is derived as an asymptotic ratio, while Sec. 3.4 matches at s=1); fixing one constant cannot manufacture the functional agreement in the bulk or in the asymptotic limits. Self-citations such as [49,50,53] are background references for the species-scale definition and are corroborated by independent work such as [61]; they are not used as a uniqueness theorem or as a substitute for a derivation. The acknowledged limitation that the two-derivative horizon may receive higher-curvature corrections (p. 3) concerns the physical validity of the comparison, not circularity of the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or dimensions. Its new ingredients are a diagnostic (minimal classical black hole size) and a convex hull diagram. The ledger shows that the central scaling claims rest on standard swampland assumptions about limit classification and species scale definitions, plus one ad hoc approximation: treating charges as continuous. The only free parameter is the O(1) normalization used for interior comparisons.

free parameters (1)
  • O(1) normalization for interior comparisons = sqrt(2/3) in 5d; normalization fixed at desert point s = 1 in 4d N=4
    In Section 2.3 (eq. 2.34), l_BH is multiplied by sqrt(2/3) to match the species scale asymptotically, and in Section 3.4 the two quantities are matched at s = 1 before comparing shapes. This is a chosen normalization, not derived, and it affects the interior-of-moduli-space claims.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Infinite distance limits in CY compactifications are classified as decompactification or emergent string limits with known fibration structures.
    Used throughout Sections 2 and 3; cited from [10,17] rather than proved in this paper.
  • domain assumption The species scale is correctly identified with the lightest tower(s) in asymptotic limits and with the curvature-squared Wilson coefficient F1 in the interior.
    Defines the target scales; see eqs. (2.11)-(2.12), (3.8)-(3.16), and (3.80). This follows the established species scale literature, e.g. [49,61].
  • domain assumption The two-derivative BPS attractor solution remains a valid description of the black hole even when the horizon approaches the species scale.
    The paper states it works 'in complete disregard of the curvature corrections' (Section 1), and this is the key premise for interpreting classical entropies as physical sizes.
  • ad hoc to paper Charge quantization can be approximated by continuous charges when mapping attractor values to moduli space points.
    Stated in Sections 2.1 and 3.1.2 with a heuristic justification; without this, the continuous interpolation between moduli and charges is not justified.
  • standard math Dirac quantization requires magnetic charges to be integers in the no-smaller-than-species proofs.
    Used in Section 3.3 to argue that |C x0| cannot scale to zero without making charges vanish and trivializing the solution.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Classical Black Hole Probes of UV Scales." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VVXR3LAT

@misc{pith2026250203514,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Classical Black Hole Probes of UV Scales},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VVXR3LAT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03514}
}
read the original abstract

In the context of the Swampland program, black hole attractors have been employed to probe infinite distances in moduli space, where the EFT cutoff goes to zero in Planck units and UV effects become significant. In this paper, we take the perspective of the two-derivative action of string theoretic effective field theories and explore various families of extremal black hole solutions that probe infinite distance limits at their horizons. While these solutions do not include higher-order corrections in the EFT expansion, we find that, in many cases, the smallest BPS black holes in these families remarkably reproduce either the species scale or some other Kaluza-Klein scale. In highly supersymmetric cases, this match with UV scales even persists in the interior of moduli space. We even find that non-BPS black holes solutions in circle compactification of Type II string theories follow the species scale in decompactification limits. These observations suggests that the two-derivative action may encode information about relevant UV scales. We discuss the interplay of these results with emergence and UV/IR mixing in quantum gravity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Integral Scaling for EFT Strings from the Bottom-Up

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Under brane-taxonomy axioms and an n_e≤7 homogeneity bound, integral scaling with w≤3 is an exhaustive finite consequence for all EFT string candidates in 4d N=1 moduli slices.

  2. Black Hole Entropy, Quantum Corrections and EFT Transitions

    hep-th 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Quantum corrections to BPS black hole entropy in 4d N=2 string compactifications can be resummed into a finite formula that interpolates between four- and five-dimensional EFT descriptions and matches exact 5d microst...

  3. Moduli Space Quantum Mechanics

    hep-th 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Moduli-space geometry induces effective potentials that localize excited quantum wavefunctions in the bulk with positive energies, even for classically runaway potentials.

  4. Breaking Free from the Swampland of Impossible Universes through the DESI Portal

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    DESI data indicating evolving dark energy may allow string theory to describe observed universes without violating swampland constraints on constant dark energy.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

138 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [51]

    Cribiori, D

    N. Cribiori, D. L¨ ust and C. Montella, Species entropy and thermodynamics , JHEP 10 (2023) 059 [2305.10489]

    arXiv 2023

  2. [81]

    Castellano and M

    A. Castellano and M. Zatti, Black Hole Entropy, Quantum Corrections and EFT Transitions , 2502.02655

    arXiv

  3. [1]

    Vafa, The String landscape and the swampland , hep-th/0509212

    C. Vafa, The String landscape and the swampland , hep-th/0509212

    arXiv

  4. [2]

    Ooguri and C

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland , Nucl. Phys. B 766 (2007) 21 [ hep-th/0605264]

    arXiv 2007

  5. [3]

    Palti, The Swampland: Introduction and Review , Fortsch

    E. Palti, The Swampland: Introduction and Review , Fortsch. Phys. 67 (2019) 1900037 [1903.06239]

    arXiv 2019

  6. [4]

    van Beest, J

    M. van Beest, J. Calder´ on-Infante, D. Mirfendereski and I. Valenzuela, Lectures on the Swampland Program in String Compactifications , 2102.01111

    arXiv

  7. [5]

    Gra˜ na and A

    M. Gra˜ na and A. Herr´ aez,The Swampland Conjectures: A Bridge from Quantum Gravity to Particle Physics , Universe 7 (2021) 273 [ 2107.00087]

    arXiv 2021

  8. [6]

    Agmon, A

    N.B. Agmon, A. Bedroya, M.J. Kang and C. Vafa, Lectures on the string landscape and the Swampland, 2212.06187

    arXiv

Show all 138 references
  1. [7]

    Klaewer and E

    D. Klaewer and E. Palti, Super-Planckian Spatial Field Variations and Quantum Gravity , JHEP 01 (2017) 088 [ 1610.00010]

    2017 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Grimm, E

    T.W. Grimm, E. Palti and I. Valenzuela, Infinite Distances in Field Space and Massless Towers of States , JHEP 08 (2018) 143 [ 1802.08264]

    2018 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Ooguri, E

    H. Ooguri, E. Palti, G. Shiu and C. Vafa, Distance and de Sitter Conjectures on the Swampland, 1810.05506

    arXiv

  4. [10]

    Corvilain, T.W

    P. Corvilain, T.W. Grimm and I. Valenzuela, The Swampland Distance Conjecture for K¨ ahler moduli, JHEP 08 (2019) 075 [ 1812.07548]

    2019 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Grimm, C

    T.W. Grimm, C. Li and E. Palti, Infinite Distance Networks in Field Space and Charge Orbits, JHEP 03 (2019) 016 [ 1811.02571]

    2019 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Buratti, J

    G. Buratti, J. Calder´ on and A.M. Uranga, Transplanckian axion monodromy!?, JHEP 05 (2019) 176 [ 1812.05016]

    2019 arXiv

  7. [13]

    Marchesano and M

    F. Marchesano and M. Wiesner, Instantons and infinite distances , JHEP 08 (2019) 088 [1904.04848]

    2019 arXiv

  8. [14]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand, Emergent Strings, Duality and Weak Coupling Limits for Two-Form Fields , 1904.06344

    1904 arXiv

  9. [15]

    L¨ ust, E

    D. L¨ ust, E. Palti and C. Vafa,AdS and the Swampland , Phys. Lett. B 797 (2019) 134867 [1906.05225]

    2019 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Kehagias, D

    A. Kehagias, D. L¨ ust and S. L¨ ust,Swampland, Gradient Flow and Infinite Distance , JHEP 04 (2020) 170 [ 1910.00453]

    2020 arXiv

  11. [17]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand, Emergent strings from infinite distance limits , JHEP 02 (2022) 190 [ 1910.01135]

    2022 arXiv

  12. [18]

    Baume, F

    F. Baume, F. Marchesano and M. Wiesner, Instanton Corrections and Emergent Strings , JHEP 04 (2020) 174 [ 1912.02218]

    2020 arXiv

  13. [19]

    Bonnefoy, L

    Q. Bonnefoy, L. Ciambelli, D. L¨ ust and S. L¨ ust,Infinite Black Hole Entropies at Infinite Distances and Tower of States , Nucl. Phys. B 958 (2020) 115112 [ 1912.07453]. – 57 –

    2020 arXiv

  14. [20]

    Gendler and I

    N. Gendler and I. Valenzuela, Merging the Weak Gravity and Distance Conjectures Using BPS Extremal Black Holes , 2004.10768

    2004 arXiv

  15. [21]

    Calder´ on-Infante, A.M

    J. Calder´ on-Infante, A.M. Uranga and I. Valenzuela,The Convex Hull Swampland Distance Conjecture and Bounds on Non-geodesics , JHEP 03 (2021) 299 [ 2012.00034]

    2021 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Baume and J

    F. Baume and J. Calder´ on Infante,Tackling the SDC in AdS with CFTs , 2011.03583

    2011 arXiv

  17. [23]

    Perlmutter, L

    E. Perlmutter, L. Rastelli, C. Vafa and I. Valenzuela, A CFT Distance Conjecture , 2011.10040

    2011 arXiv

  18. [24]

    Cribiori, D

    N. Cribiori, D. L¨ ust and M. Scalisi, The gravitino and the swampland , JHEP 06 (2021) 071 [2104.08288]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [25]

    Castellano, A

    A. Castellano, A. Font, A. Herraez and L.E. Ib´ a˜ nez,A gravitino distance conjecture, JHEP 08 (2021) 092 [ 2104.10181]

    2021 arXiv

  20. [26]

    Buratti, J

    G. Buratti, J. Calder´ on-Infante, M. Delgado and A.M. Uranga, Dynamical Cobordism and Swampland Distance Conjectures, JHEP 10 (2021) 037 [ 2107.09098]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [27]

    Etheredge, B

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, S. Kaya, Y. Qiu and T. Rudelius, Sharpening the Distance Conjecture in diverse dimensions , JHEP 12 (2022) 114 [ 2206.04063]

    2022 arXiv

  22. [28]

    Angius, J

    R. Angius, J. Calder´ on-Infante, M. Delgado, J. Huertas and A.M. Uranga, At the end of the world: Local Dynamical Cobordism , JHEP 06 (2022) 142 [ 2203.11240]

    2022 arXiv

  23. [29]

    Angius, J

    R. Angius, J. Huertas and A.M. Uranga, Small black hole explosions , JHEP 06 (2023) 070 [2303.15903]

    2023 arXiv

  24. [30]

    Baume and J

    F. Baume and J. Calder´ on-Infante,On higher-spin points and infinite distances in conformal manifolds, JHEP 12 (2023) 163 [ 2305.05693]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [31]

    Etheredge, B

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, J. McNamara, T. Rudelius, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela, Running decompactification, sliding towers, and the distance conjecture , JHEP 12 (2023) 182 [2306.16440]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [32]

    Calder´ on-Infante, A

    J. Calder´ on-Infante, A. Castellano, A. Herr´ aez and L.E. Ib´ a˜ nez,Entropy bounds and the species scale distance conjecture, JHEP 01 (2024) 039 [ 2306.16450]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [33]

    Castellano, I

    A. Castellano, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela, Stringy evidence for a universal pattern at infinite distance, JHEP 06 (2024) 037 [ 2311.01536]

    2024 arXiv

  28. [34]

    Castellano, I

    A. Castellano, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela, Universal Pattern in Quantum Gravity at Infinite Distance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 181601 [ 2311.01501]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [35]

    Basile, D

    I. Basile, D. L¨ ust and C. Montella, Shedding black hole light on the emergent string conjecture , JHEP 07 (2024) 208 [ 2311.12113]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [36]

    Demulder, D

    S. Demulder, D. L¨ ust and T. Raml, Topology change and non-geometry at infinite distance , JHEP 06 (2024) 079 [ 2312.07674]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [37]

    Angius, A

    R. Angius, A. Makridou and A.M. Uranga, Intersecting end of the world branes , JHEP 03 (2024) 110 [ 2312.16286]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [38]

    Angius, End of the world brane networks for infinite distance limits in CY moduli space , JHEP 09 (2024) 178 [ 2404.14486]

    R. Angius, End of the world brane networks for infinite distance limits in CY moduli space , JHEP 09 (2024) 178 [ 2404.14486]. – 58 –

    2024 arXiv

  33. [39]

    Etheredge, B

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, T. Rudelius, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela, Taxonomy of Infinite Distance Limits, 2405.20332

    arXiv

  34. [40]

    Calder´ on-Infante and I

    J. Calder´ on-Infante and I. Valenzuela,Tensionless String Limits in 4d Conformal Manifolds , 2410.07309

    arXiv

  35. [41]

    Demulder, D

    S. Demulder, D. L¨ ust and T. Raml, Navigating string theory field space with geometric flows , 2412.10364

    arXiv

  36. [42]

    Dvali, Black Holes and Large N Species Solution to the Hierarchy Problem , Fortsch

    G. Dvali, Black Holes and Large N Species Solution to the Hierarchy Problem , Fortsch. Phys. 58 (2010) 528 [ 0706.2050]

    2010 arXiv

  37. [43]

    Dvali and M

    G. Dvali and M. Redi, Black Hole Bound on the Number of Species and Quantum Gravity at LHC, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 045027 [ 0710.4344]

    2008 arXiv

  38. [44]

    Dvali and C

    G. Dvali and C. Gomez, Quantum Information and Gravity Cutoff in Theories with Species , Phys. Lett. B 674 (2009) 303 [ 0812.1940]

    2009 arXiv

  39. [45]

    Dvali and D

    G. Dvali and D. L¨ ust,Evaporation of Microscopic Black Holes in String Theory and the Bound on Species , Fortsch. Phys. 58 (2010) 505 [ 0912.3167]

    2010 arXiv

  40. [46]

    Dvali and C

    G. Dvali and C. Gomez, Species and Strings , 1004.3744

    arXiv

  41. [47]

    Dvali, C

    G. Dvali, C. Gomez and D. L¨ ust, Black Hole Quantum Mechanics in the Presence of Species , Fortsch. Phys. 61 (2013) 768 [ 1206.2365]

    2013 arXiv

  42. [48]

    Castellano, A

    A. Castellano, A. Herr´ aez and L.E. Ib´ a˜ nez,The emergence proposal in quantum gravity and the species scale, JHEP 06 (2023) 047 [ 2212.03908]

    2023 arXiv

  43. [49]

    van de Heisteeg, C

    D. van de Heisteeg, C. Vafa, M. Wiesner and D.H. Wu, Moduli-dependent Species Scale, 2212.06841

    arXiv

  44. [50]

    Cribiori, D

    N. Cribiori, D. L¨ ust and G. Staudt, Black hole entropy and moduli-dependent species scale , Phys. Lett. B 844 (2023) 138113 [ 2212.10286]

    2023 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Cribiori and D

    N. Cribiori and D. L¨ ust,A Note on Modular Invariant Species Scale and Potentials , Fortsch. Phys. 71 (2023) 2300150 [ 2306.08673]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Calder´ on-Infante, M

    J. Calder´ on-Infante, M. Delgado and A.M. Uranga, Emergence of species scale black hole horizons, JHEP 01 (2024) 003 [ 2310.04488]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Basile, N

    I. Basile, N. Cribiori, D. L¨ ust and C. Montella, Minimal black holes and species thermodynamics, JHEP 06 (2024) 127 [ 2401.06851]

    2024 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Herr´ aez, D

    A. Herr´ aez, D. L¨ ust, J. Masias and M. Scalisi,On the Origin of Species Thermodynamics and the Black Hole - Tower Correspondence , 2406.17851

    arXiv

  49. [56]

    Anastasi, R

    E. Anastasi, R. Angius, J. Huertas, A. Uranga and C. Wang, Relative Quantum Gravity: Localized Gravity and the Swampland , 2501.03310

    arXiv

  50. [57]

    Valeixo Bento and J.a.F

    B. Valeixo Bento and J.a.F. Melo, EFT & Species Scale: Friends or foes? , 2501.08230

    arXiv

  51. [58]

    Calder´ on-Infante, A

    J. Calder´ on-Infante, A. Castellano and A. Herr´ aez,The Double EFT Expansion in Quantum Gravity, 2501.14880. – 59 –

    arXiv

  52. [59]

    van de Heisteeg, C

    D. van de Heisteeg, C. Vafa and M. Wiesner, Bounds on Species Scale and the Distance Conjecture, Fortsch. Phys. 71 (2023) 2300143 [ 2303.13580]

    2023 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Castellano, A

    A. Castellano, A. Herr´ aez and L.E. Ib´ a˜ nez,On the species scale, modular invariance and the gravitational EFT expansion , JHEP 12 (2024) 019 [ 2310.07708]

    2024 arXiv

  54. [61]

    van de Heisteeg, C

    D. van de Heisteeg, C. Vafa, M. Wiesner and D.H. Wu, Species Scale in Diverse Dimensions , 2310.07213

    arXiv

  55. [62]

    Bedroya, R.K

    A. Bedroya, R.K. Mishra and M. Wiesner, Density of States, Black Holes and the Emergent String Conjecture, 2405.00083

    arXiv

  56. [63]

    Aoufia, I

    C. Aoufia, I. Basile and G. Leone, Species scale, worldsheet CFTs and emergent geometry , 2405.03683

    arXiv

  57. [64]

    Castellano, The Quantum Gravity Scale and the Swampland , Ph.D

    A. Castellano, The Quantum Gravity Scale and the Swampland , Ph.D. thesis, U. Autonoma, Madrid (main), 2024. 2409.10003

    2024 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Delgado, M

    M. Delgado, M. Montero and C. Vafa, Black holes as probes of moduli space geometry , JHEP 04 (2023) 045 [ 2212.08676]

    2023 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Ferrara, R

    S. Ferrara, R. Kallosh and A. Strominger, N=2 extremal black holes , Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) R5412 [hep-th/9508072]

    1995 arXiv

  60. [67]

    Ferrara and R

    S. Ferrara and R. Kallosh, Supersymmetry and attractors , Physical Review D 54 (1996) 1514

    1996

  61. [68]

    Ferrara and R

    S. Ferrara and R. Kallosh, University of supersymmetric attractors , Physical Review D 54 (1996) 1525

    1996

  62. [69]

    Ferrara, G.W

    S. Ferrara, G.W. Gibbons and R. Kallosh, Black holes and critical points in moduli space , Nuclear Physics B 500 (1997) 75

    1997

  63. [70]

    Moore, Arithmetic and attractors , hep-th/9807087

    G. Moore, Arithmetic and attractors , hep-th/9807087

    arXiv

  64. [71]

    Moore, Attractors and arithmetic , hep-th/9807056

    G.W. Moore, Attractors and arithmetic , hep-th/9807056

    arXiv

  65. [72]

    Strominger, Macroscopic entropy of N=2 extremal black holes , Phys

    A. Strominger, Macroscopic entropy of N=2 extremal black holes , Phys. Lett. B 383 (1996) 39 [hep-th/9602111]

    1996 arXiv

  66. [73]

    Denef, Attractors at weak gravity , Nuclear Physics B 547 (1999) 201

    F. Denef, Attractors at weak gravity , Nuclear Physics B 547 (1999) 201

    1999

  67. [74]

    Denef, B.R

    F. Denef, B.R. Greene and M. Raugas, Split attractor flows and the spectrum of BPS D-branes on the quintic , JHEP 05 (2001) 012 [ hep-th/0101135]

    2001 arXiv

  68. [75]

    Kraus and F

    P. Kraus and F. Larsen, Attractors and black rings , Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 024010 [hep-th/0503219]

    2005 arXiv

  69. [76]

    Larsen, The Attractor Mechanism in Five Dimensions , Lect

    F. Larsen, The Attractor Mechanism in Five Dimensions , Lect. Notes Phys. 755 (2008) 249 [hep-th/0608191]

    2008 arXiv

  70. [77]

    Cribiori, A

    N. Cribiori, A. Gnecchi, D. L¨ ust and M. Scalisi, On the correspondence between black holes, domain walls and fluxes , JHEP 05 (2023) 033 [ 2302.03054]

    2023 arXiv

  71. [78]

    Li, Black holes and the swampland: the deep throat revelations , JHEP 06 (2021) 065 [2102.04480]

    Y. Li, Black holes and the swampland: the deep throat revelations , JHEP 06 (2021) 065 [2102.04480]

    2021 arXiv

  72. [79]

    Li, An Alliance in the Tripartite Conflict over Moduli Space , 2112.03281

    Y. Li, An Alliance in the Tripartite Conflict over Moduli Space , 2112.03281. – 60 –

    arXiv

  73. [80]

    Dabholkar and S

    A. Dabholkar and S. Nampuri, Quantum black holes , Lect. Notes Phys. 851 (2012) 165 [1208.4814]

    2012 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Heidenreich, M

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius, The Weak Gravity Conjecture and Emergence from an Ultraviolet Cutoff , Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 337 [ 1712.01868]

    2018 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Heidenreich, M

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius, Emergence of Weak Coupling at Large Distance in Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 051601 [ 1802.08698]

    2018 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Marchesano and L

    F. Marchesano and L. Melotti, EFT strings and emergence , JHEP 02 (2023) 112 [2211.01409]

    2023 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Castellano, A

    A. Castellano, A. Herr´ aez and L.E. Ib´ a˜ nez,Towers and hierarchies in the Standard Model from Emergence in Quantum Gravity , JHEP 10 (2023) 172 [ 2302.00017]

    2023 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Blumenhagen, A

    R. Blumenhagen, A. Gligovic and A. Paraskevopoulou, The emergence proposal and the emergent string, JHEP 10 (2023) 145 [ 2305.10490]

    2023 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Blumenhagen, N

    R. Blumenhagen, N. Cribiori, A. Gligovic and A. Paraskevopoulou, Demystifying the Emergence Proposal, JHEP 04 (2024) 053 [ 2309.11551]

    2024 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Blumenhagen, N

    R. Blumenhagen, N. Cribiori, A. Gligovic and A. Paraskevopoulou, Emergent M-theory limit , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) L021901 [ 2309.11554]

    2024 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Hattab and E

    J. Hattab and E. Palti, On the particle picture of Emergence , JHEP 03 (2024) 065 [2312.15440]

    2024 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Blumenhagen, N

    R. Blumenhagen, N. Cribiori, A. Gligovic and A. Paraskevopoulou, Emergence of R 4-terms in M-theory, JHEP 07 (2024) 018 [ 2404.01371]

    2024 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Ooguri, C

    H. Ooguri, C. Vafa and E.P. Verlinde, Hartle-Hawking wave-function for flux compactifications, Lett. Math. Phys. 74 (2005) 311 [ hep-th/0502211]

    2005 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Greene, D.R

    B.R. Greene, D.R. Morrison and A. Strominger, Black hole condensation and the unification of string vacua , Nucl. Phys. B 451 (1995) 109 [ hep-th/9504145]

    1995 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Greene, D.R

    B.R. Greene, D.R. Morrison and C. Vafa, A Geometric realization of confinement , Nucl. Phys. B 481 (1996) 513 [ hep-th/9608039]

    1996 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Cribiori, M

    N. Cribiori, M. Dierigl, A. Gnecchi, D. L¨ ust and M. Scalisi, Large and small non-extremal black holes, thermodynamic dualities, and the Swampland , JHEP 10 (2022) 093 [ 2202.04657]

    2022 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Lopes Cardoso, D

    G. Lopes Cardoso, D. L¨ ust and T. Mohaupt, Modular symmetries of N=2 black holes , Phys. Lett. B 388 (1996) 266 [ hep-th/9608099]

    1996 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Rabadan, Branes at angles, torons, stability and supersymmetry , Nucl

    R. Rabadan, Branes at angles, torons, stability and supersymmetry , Nucl. Phys. B 620 (2002) 152 [hep-th/0107036]

    2002 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Angelantonj, I

    C. Angelantonj, I. Antoniadis, E. Dudas and A. Sagnotti, Type I strings on magnetized orbifolds and brane transmutation , Phys. Lett. B 489 (2000) 223 [ hep-th/0007090]

    2000 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Blumenhagen, L

    R. Blumenhagen, L. Gorlich, B. K¨ ors and D. L¨ ust,Asymmetric orbifolds, noncommutative geometry and type I string vacua , Nucl. Phys. B 582 (2000) 44 [ hep-th/0003024]. – 61 –

    2000 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Aldazabal, S

    G. Aldazabal, S. Franco, L.E. Ibanez, R. Rabadan and A.M. Uranga, D = 4 chiral string compactifications from intersecting branes, J. Math. Phys. 42 (2001) 3103 [ hep-th/0011073]

    2001 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Aldazabal, S

    G. Aldazabal, S. Franco, L.E. Ibanez, R. Rabadan and A.M. Uranga, Intersecting brane worlds, JHEP 02 (2001) 047 [ hep-ph/0011132]

    2001 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Blumenhagen, B

    R. Blumenhagen, B. K¨ ors and D. L¨ ust,Type I strings with F flux and B flux , JHEP 02 (2001) 030 [hep-th/0012156]

    2001 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Blumenhagen, B

    R. Blumenhagen, B. K¨ ors, D. L¨ ust and S. Stieberger,Four-dimensional String Compactifications with D-Branes, Orientifolds and Fluxes , Phys. Rept. 445 (2007) 1 [hep-th/0610327]

    2007 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Ibanez and A.M

    L.E. Ibanez and A.M. Uranga, String theory and particle physics: An introduction to string phenomenology, Cambridge University Press (2, 2012)

    2012

  96. [104]

    Eckardt and Y

    B. Eckardt and Y. Li, The 1/4-BPS building blocks of brane interactions , JHEP 07 (2024) 185 [2312.13269]

    2024 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Bena, S.D

    I. Bena, S.D. Hampton, A. Houppe, Y. Li and D. Toulikas, The (amazing) super-maze , JHEP 03 (2023) 237 [ 2211.14326]

    2023 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Bena and R

    I. Bena and R. Dulac, On the supersymmetries of branes with fluxes , 2407.10203

    arXiv

  99. [107]

    Dulac and Y

    R. Dulac and Y. Li, To appear,

  100. [108]

    Dijkgraaf, C

    R. Dijkgraaf, C. Vafa and E. Verlinde, M-theory and a topological string duality , hep-th/0602087

    arXiv

  101. [109]

    Ooguri, A

    H. Ooguri, A. Strominger and C. Vafa, Black hole attractors and the topological string , Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 106007 [ hep-th/0405146]

    2004 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Ferrara, C

    S. Ferrara, C. Kounnas, D. L¨ ust and F. Zwirner, Duality invariant partition functions and automorphic superpotentials for (2,2) string compactifications , Nucl. Phys. B 365 (1991) 431

    1991

  103. [111]

    Bershadsky, S

    M. Bershadsky, S. Cecotti, H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, Holomorphic anomalies in topological field theories, Nucl. Phys. B 405 (1993) 279 [ hep-th/9302103]

    1993 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Kiritsis, Introduction to nonperturbative string theory , AIP Conf

    E. Kiritsis, Introduction to nonperturbative string theory , AIP Conf. Proc. 419 (1998) 265 [hep-th/9708130]

    1998 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Bergshoeff, C.M

    E. Bergshoeff, C.M. Hull and T. Ortin, Duality in the type II superstring effective action , Nucl. Phys. B 451 (1995) 547 [ hep-th/9504081]

    1995 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Das and S

    A.K. Das and S. Roy, On M theory and the symmetries of type II string effective actions , Nucl. Phys. B 482 (1996) 119 [ hep-th/9605073]

    1996 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Sen, Black hole entropy function and the attractor mechanism in higher derivative gravity , JHEP 09 (2005) 038 [ hep-th/0506177]

    A. Sen, Black hole entropy function and the attractor mechanism in higher derivative gravity , JHEP 09 (2005) 038 [ hep-th/0506177]

    2005 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Goldstein, N

    K. Goldstein, N. Iizuka, R.P. Jena and S.P. Trivedi, Non-supersymmetric attractors, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 124021 [ hep-th/0507096]

    2005 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Castellano, A

    A. Castellano, A. Herr´ aez and L.E. Ib´ a˜ nez,IR/UV mixing, towers of species and swampland conjectures, JHEP 08 (2022) 217 [ 2112.10796]

    2022 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Cheung and G.N

    C. Cheung and G.N. Remmen, Naturalness and the Weak Gravity Conjecture , Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 051601 [ 1402.2287]. – 62 –

    2014 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Montero, A.M

    M. Montero, A.M. Uranga and I. Valenzuela, Transplanckian axions!?, JHEP 08 (2015) 032 [1503.03886]

    2015 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Calder´ on-Infante, I

    J. Calder´ on-Infante, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela,Asymptotic accelerated expansion in string theory and the Swampland , JHEP 06 (2023) 129 [ 2209.11821]

    2023 arXiv

  113. [121]

    van de Heisteeg, C

    D. van de Heisteeg, C. Vafa, M. Wiesner and D.H. Wu, Bounds on field range for slowly varying positive potentials , JHEP 02 (2024) 175 [ 2305.07701]

    2024 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Hamada, M

    Y. Hamada, M. Montero, C. Vafa and I. Valenzuela, Finiteness and the swampland , J. Phys. A 55 (2022) 224005 [ 2111.00015]

    2022 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Heidenreich, M

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius, Weak Gravity Strongly Constrains Large-Field Axion Inflation , JHEP 12 (2015) 108 [ 1506.03447]

    2015 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Heidenreich, M

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius, Evidence for a sublattice weak gravity conjecture , JHEP 08 (2017) 025 [ 1606.08437]

    2017 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Andriolo, D

    S. Andriolo, D. Junghans, T. Noumi and G. Shiu, A Tower Weak Gravity Conjecture from Infrared Consistency, Fortsch. Phys. 66 (2018) 1800020 [ 1802.04287]

    2018 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Heidenreich, M

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius, Repulsive Forces and the Weak Gravity Conjecture , JHEP 10 (2019) 055 [ 1906.02206]

    2019 arXiv

  119. [127]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand, A Stringy Test of the Scalar Weak Gravity Conjecture , Nucl. Phys. B 938 (2019) 321 [ 1810.05169]

    2019 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Bedroya, C

    A. Bedroya, C. Vafa and D.H. Wu, The Tale of Three Scales: the Planck, the Species, and the Black Hole Scales , 2403.18005

    arXiv

  121. [129]

    Maldacena, A

    J.M. Maldacena, A. Strominger and E. Witten, Black hole entropy in M theory , JHEP 12 (1997) 002 [ hep-th/9711053]

    1997 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Strominger and C

    A. Strominger and C. Vafa, Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy , Phys. Lett. B 379 (1996) 99 [ hep-th/9601029]

    1996 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Cardy, Operator Content of Two-Dimensional Conformally Invariant Theories , Nucl

    J.L. Cardy, Operator Content of Two-Dimensional Conformally Invariant Theories , Nucl. Phys. B 270 (1986) 186

    1986

  124. [132]

    Ingham, A Tauberian Theorem for Partitions , Annals of Mathematics 42 (1941) 1075

    A.E. Ingham, A Tauberian Theorem for Partitions , Annals of Mathematics 42 (1941) 1075

    1941

  125. [133]

    Modular forms lecture 17: Partitions

    L. Rolen, “Modular forms lecture 17: Partitions.” https://math.vanderbilt.edu/rolenl/ModularFormsLecture17.pdf

  126. [134]

    Asymptotic formulas for general colored partitions

    Y.-G. Chen and L. Ya-Li, “Asymptotic formulas for general colored partitions.” https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.05938

    arXiv

  127. [135]

    Erd¨ os and J

    P. Erd¨ os and J. Lehner,The distribution of the number of sumands in the partitions of a positive integer, Duke Math. J. 8(2) (1941) 335

    1941

  128. [136]

    David, G

    J.R. David, G. Mandal and S.R. Wadia, Microscopic formulation of black holes in string theory, Phys. Rept. 369 (2002) 549 [ hep-th/0203048]

    2002 arXiv

  129. [137]

    Balasubramanian, P

    V. Balasubramanian, P. Kraus and M. Shigemori, Massless black holes and black rings as effective geometries of the D1-D5 system , Class. Quant. Grav. 22 (2005) 4803 [hep-th/0508110]. – 63 –

    2005 arXiv

  130. [138]

    Larsen and E.J

    F. Larsen and E.J. Martinec, U(1) charges and moduli in the D1 - D5 system , JHEP 06 (1999) 019 [ hep-th/9905064]. – 64 –

    1999 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.