Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Displacement memory and B-memory in generalised Ellis-Bronnikov wormholes

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A gravitational-wave pulse leaves permanent displacement and velocity memory in a generalised Ellis-Bronnikov wormhole, with the effect controlled by the wormhole's throat radius and steepness.

desk verdict A clean toy-model calculation of geodesic and congruence memory in GEB wormholes, but the 'gravitational wave' is an unfettered metric ansatz never checked against linearized Einstein equations. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03007 v1 pith:7Z5YSVKK submitted 2025-02-05 gr-qc hep-th

Soumya Bhattacharya , Suman Ghosh This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-th
keywords gravitationalwavememorydisplacementB-memoryEllis-BronnikovwormholegeodesicdeviationRaychaudhuriequationblackholemimickershairs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that when a gravitational-wave pulse passes through a generalised Ellis-Bronnikov wormhole, nearby test geodesics acquire a permanent change in separation (displacement memory) and a lasting relative velocity (velocity memory), and that the expansion and shear of a geodesic congruence also retain a net change (B-memory). If true, these memory signals would carry the imprints of the wormhole's two parameters, the throat radius $b_0$ and the steepness $m$, making memory a potential observational discriminator between wormholes and Schwarzschild black holes. The authors solve the geodesic equations and the B-tensor/Raychaudhuri evolution numerically for a sech-squared pulse, and find that the memory grows as the throat radius shrinks or the steepness parameter increases. They present this as a distinguishing feature of wormhole geometries that future gravitational-wave detectors could probe.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the generalised Ellis-Bronnikov wormhole line element, $ds^2 = -du^2 - 2\,du\,dl + [r(l)^2 + r(l)H(u)]\,d\theta^2 + [r(l)^2 - r(l)H(u)]\sin^2\theta\,d\phi^2$, with $r(l) = (b_0^m + l^m)^{1/m}$ and $H(u) = A\,\mathrm{sech}^2(u-u_0)$. Together with the B-tensor evolution equation $u^\mu \nabla_\mu B_{\alpha\beta} = -B_{\alpha\mu}B^\mu_{\ \beta} - R_{\alpha\mu\beta\nu}u^\mu u^\nu$, from which the expansion scalar and shear amplitude are read off, this sets up the geodesic-deviation and Raychaudhuri analyses that carry the memory computation.

What would settle it

Compute the linearized Einstein tensor of the perturbed metric (8) on the GEB background and check whether the perturbation satisfies the vacuum linearized Einstein equations; if the residual does not vanish and no source is supplied, the memory predictions cannot be attributed to gravitational waves.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the gravitational-wave memory effect, both in the displacement of geodesics and in the B-memory of geodesic congruences, is sensitive to the 'hairs' of a generalised Ellis-Bronnikov wormhole. Working in outgoing Bondi-Sachs coordinates with the metric perturbation $h_{\mu\nu}$ encoded by $H(u)=A\,\mathrm{sech}^2(u-u_0)$ in the $\theta\theta$ and $\phi\phi$ components, the authors integrate the geodesic deviation for pairs of timelike geodesics and the B-tensor equation for a congruence, and find permanent changes after the pulse passes. They report that decreasing the throat radius $b_0$ acts like increasing the steepness parameter $m$, because both move the pulse through a region of lower background curvature, and that the B-memory (net expansion and shear deformation of the congruence) likewise depends on these parameters, becoming smaller for larger $m$.

Load-bearing premise

The metric perturbation $H(u)$, added to the wormhole background by hand, is assumed to be a transverse-traceless gravitational wave in this curved spacetime, but the paper never checks that it solves the linearized Einstein equations on the wormhole background; if it does not, the computed geodesic and congruence memory is not a physical gravitational-wave effect.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the memory is real and parameter-dependent, a detected displacement or B-memory signal would encode the wormhole's throat radius and steepness, offering a way to distinguish wormholes from Schwarzschild black holes by gravitational-wave observations alone.
  • The reported growth of memory as $b_0$ decreases or $m$ increases gives a concrete trend that could be compared against templates from other black hole mimickers.
  • The B-memory result implies that a congruence passing through a wormhole throat retains a net expansion and shear after the pulse, which could leave an imprint on later propagation of light or matter in the vicinity.
  • Because the calculation is done in Bondi-Sachs form, the same setup can be extended to compute the associated Bondi mass change, connecting the wormhole memory to null-infinity conservation laws.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next test is to check whether a genuinely propagating wave solution, rather than the adopted transverse-traceless-like ansatz, still produces the same parameter dependence in the GEB background; this would separate the physics from the gauge choice.
  • The same numerical pipeline could be applied to rotating wormhole spacetimes, where the memory could carry additional signatures of frame dragging.
  • The sech-squared pulse has a finite duration; the dependence on pulse width and amplitude beyond the $b_0 > A$ constraint is not explored and could change the hierarchy of memory magnitudes.
  • The wormhole memory picture connects to BMS supertranslation memory at null infinity: if the GEB geometry is asymptotically flat, the displacement memory here should match the supertranslation shift computed at infinity, offering a cross-check.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies gravitational-wave (GW) memory in generalized Ellis-Bronnikov (GEB) wormhole spacetimes. The authors add a metric perturbation h_mu nu with pulse profile H(u)=A sech^2(u-u0) to the GEB background in outgoing Bondi-Sachs coordinates, solve the geodesic equations for nearby timelike geodesics, and solve the B-tensor/Raychaudhuri equation for a geodesic congruence. They report displacement and velocity memory along the l and phi directions, and B-memory in the expansion and shear of the congruence, with amplitudes that depend on the wormhole parameters m and b0. They argue these effects could serve as distinguishing signatures of wormhole spacetimes relative to Schwarzschild black holes.

Significance. If the perturbed metric in Eq. (8) were a genuine gravitational wave on the GEB background, the paper would be a useful, timely exploration of memory effects as probes of wormhole 'hairs', complementing earlier work on wormhole memory. The numerical implementation is transparent, the figures are informative, and the comparison with known results for the background congruence in the absence of the pulse is a good check. The B-memory part connects to recent developments on geodesic congruences. However, the central physical claim rests entirely on the unverified assumption that Eq. (8) describes a gravitational-wave perturbation; because that assumption is not established, the present results are computations for an arbitrary metric rather than predictions about GW memory. The parameter dependence of the memory is also largely built into the chosen ansatz, so the paper should be read as an illustration of a specific model rather than a generic derivation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II, Eq. (8)] The perturbation h_mu nu is assumed to represent a transverse-traceless gravitational wave, but this is never verified. The GEB background is not vacuum, so a physical gravitational wave must perturb both the metric and the matter (phantom scalar) fields; the manuscript specifies only metric components and gives no field equations for h_mu nu. Moreover, the displayed h is not transverse in the coordinates used: for example, with the background inverse metric one finds a nonzero divergence component, ∇_mu h^{mu theta} = 2 H(u) cot(theta)/r(l)^3, for theta different from pi/2, so the TT-gauge claim is not literally satisfied. In addition, the chosen amplitude A=1/2 is not small compared with the throat radius b0=1, so the linearized interpretation is not controlled. Since the entire memory calculation in Sections III and IV uses this metric, the geodesic deviations and B-tensor evolutions are properties of an arbitrarily chosen line element, not of a gravitational wave in GEB spacetime. The revision must derive h_mu nu from the linearized Einstein equations (including the matter perturbation) or replace Eq. (8) by a known exact or linearized wave solution on this background, and recompute the memory observables with a genuinely small amplitude.
  2. [Section III, Figs. 5 and 6] The positivity requirement in Section II is stated as b0 > A, and the text sets A=1/2. However, Figures 5 and 6 show b0=0.5 and b0=0.1, which violate this condition at the pulse peak: at b0=0.5 the metric component g_phi phi = r(r-H) can vanish at the throat, and at b0=0.1 it becomes negative. This either invalidates the numerical runs for small b0 or indicates mislabeled axes or captions; in either case, the claimed parameter dependence for small b0 is not reliable as presented.
  3. [Section IV, boundary condition] The B-memory results depend on the hand-picked boundary condition B_alpha beta(l=0)=0, imposed at the throat at the moment the pulse arrives. This is a nongeneric initial state for a congruence, and the claimed increase of expansion and shear in the presence of the pulse could be an artifact of this choice. The authors should either justify this boundary condition from a concrete physical setup or show that the permanent changes in expansion and shear are robust under different reasonable initial data.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section II, Eq. (3)] Equation (3) as displayed appears to have a formatting error: the tortoise coordinate should satisfy dl = dr/sqrt(1 - b(r)/r), but the printed expression is dimensionally inconsistent.
  2. [Section III.B, Eqs. (18)-(20)] The Schwarzschild geodesic equations contain unbalanced parentheses and apparent sign/typing errors, e.g. the term (2r - H(u))/2 in Eq. (18) is printed in a way that is ambiguous; these should be carefully corrected.
  3. [References] Reference [45] and reference [47] are the same paper by O’Loughlin and Demirchian, and reference [58] is the same paper as reference [18]; these should be consolidated to avoid duplicate citations.
  4. [Figures 13-16] In Figures 13-16 the vertical axis for the expansion scalar is labeled with a symbol that is easily confused with the coordinate theta; using the same symbol as in Eq. (21) would improve clarity. The caption of Figure 16 also does not specify which panel corresponds to expansion and which to shear.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the memory results are computed consequences of the explicitly assumed GEB metric and pulse ansatz, not fitted or definitionally predetermined outputs.

full rationale

The central claims are direct numerical evaluations of geodesic equations (9)-(12) and the Raychaudhuri/B-tensor equation (24) for the explicit line element (8), with the pulse profile (14) and stated boundary conditions. The dependence of the resulting displacement, velocity, and B-memory on the wormhole parameters m and b0 is inherited from the metric ansatz r(l) appearing in h_theta_theta and h_phi_phi; it is not fitted to the target memory values, and the memory integrals are not defined in terms of the quantities they predict. The self-citations [43,44] motivate the study but are not load-bearing for the derivation; the B-memory framework is attributed to [47] and the Raychaudhuri identities to standard references. The main substantive caveat is that the paper never checks that the perturbation in Eq. (8) satisfies the linearized Einstein equations on the GEB background, and the transverse-traceless gauge claim is not demonstrated; this is a physical-correctness concern about whether the ansatz represents a genuine gravitational wave, not a circularity in the derivation. No load-bearing step reduces to a fit, a self-citation chain, or a definitional identity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation introduces no new entities or fitted constants, but it relies on several hand-picked numerical parameters (A, b0, m, u0) and a key assumption that the added perturbation is a genuine gravitational wave. These choices, especially the pulse ansatz and the congruence boundary condition, carry most of the reported results.

free parameters (4)
  • GW amplitude A = A=1/2
    Chosen by hand for all numerical figures; no physical scale or matching to detector strain.
  • throat radius b0 = 1.0, 0.5, 0.1 in Sec. III; 1.0 and 2/3 in Sec. IV
    Varied to study dependence; values are arbitrary geometric units.
  • steepness parameter m = 2, 4, 6
    Even values allowed by the GEB metric; chosen to show a trend in the memory effect.
  • pulse center u0 = not specified
    Center of the sech^2 pulse; affects when the pulse passes but is not stated in the paper.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption GEB line element Eqs. (1)-(5) is a valid Lorentzian wormhole spacetime
    Taken from Kar et al. [24]; the paper does not re-derive the matter support or energy conditions.
  • ad hoc to paper The perturbation h_mu nu in Eq. (8) is a transverse-traceless gravitational wave in the GEB background
    Assumed without verifying the linearized Einstein equations; this is the weakest premise.
  • ad hoc to paper H(u)=A sech^2(u-u0) is an adequate GW pulse profile
    A convenient localized profile, not derived from a source or from a wave equation.
  • standard math Geodesic and Raychaudhuri equations with proper-time parameterization are valid
    Standard GR formalism, e.g., Wald [49].
  • ad hoc to paper Boundary condition B_alpha beta(l=0)=0 for the congruence
    Chosen to represent a congruence focused at the throat; not physically justified and no sensitivity analysis is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Displacement memory and B-memory in generalised Ellis-Bronnikov wormholes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7Z5YSVKK

@misc{pith2026250203007,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Displacement memory and B-memory in generalised Ellis-Bronnikov wormholes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7Z5YSVKK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03007}
}
read the original abstract

Gravitational wave (GW) memory effect is studied in the context of generalised Ellis-Bronnikov (GEB) wormholes. We solved the geodesic equations in this wormhole spacetime, in the presence of a GW pulse. The resulting evolution of the geodesic separation shows the presence of displacement and velocity memory. Memory effect due to a gravitational wave ensures that there is a permanent effect on spacetime geometry. The corresponding geodesic evolution, being metric dependent, would display distinct results in each case. Motivated by the same, we study further aspects of memory effect on the geodesic congruences, known as the B-memory, by solving the Raychaudhuri equations. Since future GW detectors will be able to probe the memory effect, our work presents GEB spacetime as a black hole mimicker with distinguishing features.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.03007 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Plot of the evolution of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Plot of the evolution of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Plot of the evolution of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Plot of the evolution of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Plot of the evolution of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Plot of the evolution of the separation along [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_9.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Plot of the evolution of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_7.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Plot of the evolution of the separation along [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_12.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Plot of the evolution of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Plot of the evolution of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_11.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Expansion scalar and the shear amplitude for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Expansion scalar and the shear amplitude for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Expansion scalar and the shear amplitude for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_15.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Flyby-induced displacement: analytic solution

    gr-qc 2025-02 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    The authors derive exact analytic solutions for gravitational wave displacement memory when the flyby profile is approximated by the hyperbolic Scarf potential, with magic amplitude values |g|=(2n+1) sqrt(n(n+1)).

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116 no. 6, (2016) 061102, arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral,

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., “GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 no. 16, (2017) 161101, arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole,

    Event Horizon T elescopeCollaboration, K. Akiyama et al., “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole,” Astrophys. J. Lett.875 (2019) L1, arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]

    arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. II. Array and Instrumentation,

    Event Horizon T elescopeCollaboration, K. Akiyama et al., “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. II. Array and Instrumentation,” Astrophys. J. Lett.875 no. 1, (2019) L2, arXiv:1906.11239 [astro-ph.IM]

    arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. III. Data Processing and Calibration,

    Event Horizon T elescopeCollaboration, K. Akiyama et al., “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. III. Data Processing and Calibration,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 no. 1, (2019) L3, arXiv:1906.11240 [astro-ph.GA]

    arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV. Imaging the Central Supermassive Black Hole,

    Event Horizon T elescopeCollaboration, K. Akiyama et al., “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV. Imaging the Central Supermassive Black Hole,” Astrophys. J. Lett.875 no. 1, (2019) L4, arXiv:1906.11241 [astro-ph.GA]

    arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring,

    Event Horizon T elescopeCollaboration, K. Akiyama et al., “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 no. 1, (2019) L5, arXiv:1906.11242 [astro-ph.GA]

    arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    The Fuzzball proposal for black holes: An Elementary review,

    S. D. Mathur, “The Fuzzball proposal for black holes: An Elementary review,” Fortsch. Phys.53 (2005) 793–827, arXiv:hep-th/0502050

    arXiv 2005

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report,

    V. Cardoso and P. Pani, “Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report,” Living Rev. Rel.22 no. 1, (2019) 4, arXiv:1904.05363 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  2. [10]

    A recipe for echoes from exotic compact objects,

    Z. Mark, A. Zimmerman, S. M. Du, and Y. Chen, “A recipe for echoes from exotic compact objects,” Phys. Rev. D 96 no. 8, (2017) 084002, arXiv:1706.06155 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Gravitational-wave signatures of exotic compact objects and of quantum corrections at the horizon scale,

    V. Cardoso, S. Hopper, C. F. B. Macedo, C. Palenzuela, and P. Pani, “Gravitational-wave signatures of exotic compact objects and of quantum corrections at the horizon scale,” Phys. Rev. D94 no. 8, (2016) 084031, arXiv:1608.08637 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Nomen non est omen: Why it is too soon to identify ultra-compact objects as black holes,

    S. Murk, “Nomen non est omen: Why it is too soon to identify ultra-compact objects as black holes,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D32 (2023) 2342012, arXiv:2210.03750 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Wormholes, time machines, and the weak energy condition,

    M. S. Morris, K. S. Thorne, and U. Yurtsever, “Wormholes, time machines, and the weak energy condition,” Phys. Rev. Lett.61 (Sep, 1988) 1446–1449. https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.1446

    1988 doi

  6. [14]

    General class of brane-world black holes,

    K. A. Bronnikov, V. N. Melnikov, and H. Dehnen, “General class of brane-world black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 68 (Jul, 2003) 024025. https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.68.024025. 9

    2003 doi

  7. [15]

    Testing the binary black hole nature of a compact binary coalescence,

    N. V. Krishnendu, K. G. Arun, and C. K. Mishra, “Testing the binary black hole nature of a compact binary coalescence,” Phys. Rev. Lett.119 no. 9, (2017) 091101, arXiv:1701.06318 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Is the gravitational-wave ringdown a probe of the event horizon?,

    V. Cardoso, E. Franzin, and P. Pani, “Is the gravitational-wave ringdown a probe of the event horizon?,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116 (Apr, 2016) 171101. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 116.171101

    2016 doi

  9. [17]

    Gravitational waves from quasinormal modes of a class of lorentzian wormholes,

    S. Aneesh, S. Bose, and S. Kar, “Gravitational waves from quasinormal modes of a class of lorentzian wormholes,” Phys. Rev. D97 (Jun, 2018) 124004. https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.124004

    2018 doi

  10. [19]

    Ether flow through a drainhole: A particle model in general relativity,

    H. G. Ellis, “Ether flow through a drainhole: A particle model in general relativity,” Journal of Mathematical Physics 14 no. 1, (1973) 104–118, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1666161. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1666161

    1973 doi

  11. [20]

    Scalar-tensor theory and scalar charge,

    K. A. Bronnikov, “Scalar-tensor theory and scalar charge,” Acta Phys. Polon. B4 (1973) 251–266

    1973

  12. [21]

    Light Rays, Singularities, and All That,

    E. Witten, “Light Rays, Singularities, and All That,” Rev. Mod. Phys.92 no. 4, (2020) 045004, arXiv:1901.03928 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  13. [22]

    Can extra dimensional effects allow wormholes without exotic matter?,

    S. Kar, S. Lahiri, and S. SenGupta, “Can extra dimensional effects allow wormholes without exotic matter?,” Phys. Lett. B750 (2015) 319–324, arXiv:1505.06831 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  14. [23]

    Generalised Ellis–Bronnikov wormholes embedded in warped braneworld background and energy conditions,

    V. Sharma and S. Ghosh, “Generalised Ellis–Bronnikov wormholes embedded in warped braneworld background and energy conditions,” Eur. Phys. J. C81 no. 11, (2021) 1004, arXiv:2111.07329 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [24]

    Resonances in the transmission of massless scalar waves in a class of wormholes,

    S. Kar, S. Minwalla, D. Mishra, and D. Sahdev, “Resonances in the transmission of massless scalar waves in a class of wormholes,” Phys. Rev. D51 (1995) 1632–1638

    1995

  16. [25]

    Field sources for generalized ellis-bronnikov wormhole,

    T. M. Crispim, G. Alencar, and C. R. Muniz, “Field sources for generalized ellis-bronnikov wormhole,” 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.11147

    2024 arXiv

  17. [26]

    Gravitational lensing and deflection angle by generalised ellis-bronnikov wormhole embedded in warped braneworld background,

    S. Jana, V. Sharma, and S. Ghosh, “Gravitational lensing and deflection angle by generalised ellis-bronnikov wormhole embedded in warped braneworld background,” 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.10804

    2024 arXiv

  18. [27]

    Signature quasinormal modes of ellis-bronnikov wormhole embedded in warped braneworld background,

    A. Mitra and S. Ghosh, “Signature quasinormal modes of ellis-bronnikov wormhole embedded in warped braneworld background,” Phys. Rev. D109 (Mar, 2024) 064005. https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.064005

    2024 doi

  19. [28]

    Quasinormal modes of rapidly rotating ellis-bronnikov wormholes,

    F. S. Khoo, B. Azad, J. L. Bl´ azquez-Salcedo, L. M. Gonz´ alez-Romero, B. Kleihaus, J. Kunz, and F. Navarro-L´ erida, “Quasinormal modes of rapidly rotating ellis-bronnikov wormholes,” Physical Review D 109 no. 8, (Apr., 2024) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.084013

    2024 doi

  20. [29]

    Generalized ellis–bronnikov wormholes in asymptotically safe gravity,

    M. Nilton, J. Furtado, G. Alencar, and R. Landim, “Generalized ellis–bronnikov wormholes in asymptotically safe gravity,” Annals of Physics448 (Jan., 2023) 169195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2022.169195

    2023

  21. [30]

    Generalised ellis–bronnikov wormholes in f(r) gravity,

    O. Sokoliuk, S. Mandal, P. K. Sahoo, and A. Baransky, “Generalised ellis–bronnikov wormholes in f(r) gravity,” The European Physical Journal C82 no. 4, (Apr., 2022) . http: //dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10249-5

    2022 doi

  22. [31]

    Kinematic Resonance and Memory Effect in Free Mass Gravitational Antennas,

    V. B. Braginsky and L. P. Grishchuk, “Kinematic Resonance and Memory Effect in Free Mass Gravitational Antennas,” Sov. Phys. JETP62 (1985) 427–430

    1985

  23. [32]

    The gravitational-wave memory effect,

    M. Favata, “The gravitational-wave memory effect,” Class. Qtm. Grav.27 no. 8, (Apr, 2010) 084036

    2010

  24. [33]

    Forecasts for detecting the gravitational-wave memory effect with advanced ligo and virgo,

    O. M. Boersma, D. A. Nichols, and P. Schmidt, “Forecasts for detecting the gravitational-wave memory effect with advanced ligo and virgo,” Phys. Rev. D101 (Apr, 2020) 083026. https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.083026

    2020 doi

  25. [34]

    Waveform Modelling for the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,

    LISA Consortium W aveform W orking Group Collaboration, N. Afshordi et al., “Waveform Modelling for the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,” arXiv:2311.01300 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  26. [35]

    The memory effect for plane gravitational waves,

    P.-M. Zhang, C. Duval, G. Gibbons, and P. Horvathy, “The memory effect for plane gravitational waves,” Physics Letters B772 (Sept., 2017) 743–746. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.07.050

    2017 doi

  27. [36]

    Soft gravitons and the memory effect for plane gravitational waves,

    P.-M. Zhang, C. Duval, G. Gibbons, and P. Horvathy, “Soft gravitons and the memory effect for plane gravitational waves,” Physical Review D96 no. 6, (Sept., 2017) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.064013

    2017 doi

  28. [37]

    Velocity memory effect for polarized gravitational waves,

    P.-M. Zhang, C. Duval, G. Gibbons, and P. Horvathy, “Velocity memory effect for polarized gravitational waves,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 no. 05, (May, 2018) 030–030. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/05/030

    2018 doi

  29. [38]

    Memory effect and bms-like symmetries for impulsive gravitational waves,

    S. Bhattacharjee, S. Kumar, and A. Bhattacharyya, “Memory effect and bms-like symmetries for impulsive gravitational waves,” Phys. Rev. D100 (Oct, 2019) 084010. https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.084010

    2019 doi

  30. [39]

    Kundt geometries and memory effects in the Brans-Dicke theory of gravity,

    S. Siddhant, I. Chakraborty, and S. Kar, “Kundt geometries and memory effects in the Brans-Dicke theory of gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C81 no. 4, (2021) 350

    2021

  31. [40]

    Brans-dicke theory in bondi-sachs form: Asymptotically flat solutions, asymptotic symmetries, and gravitational-wave memory effects,

    S. Tahura, D. A. Nichols, A. Saffer, L. C. Stein, and K. Yagi, “Brans-dicke theory in bondi-sachs form: Asymptotically flat solutions, asymptotic symmetries, and gravitational-wave memory effects,” Physical Review D 103 no. 10, (May, 2021) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD....

    2021 doi

  32. [41]

    Gravitational-wave memory effects in brans-dicke theory: Waveforms and effects in the post-newtonian approximation,

    S. Tahura, D. A. Nichols, and K. Yagi, “Gravitational-wave memory effects in brans-dicke theory: Waveforms and effects in the post-newtonian approximation,” Physical Review D104 no. 10, (Nov.,

  33. [42]

    Gravitational memory signal from neutrino self-interactions in supernova,

    S. Bhattacharya, D. Bose, I. Chakraborty, A. Hait, and S. Mohanty, “Gravitational memory signal from neutrino self-interactions in supernova,” Physical Review D 110 no. 6, (Sept., 2024) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.L061501

    2024 doi

  34. [43]

    Gravitational wave memory in wormhole spacetimes,

    I. Chakraborty, S. Bhattacharya, and S. Chakraborty, “Gravitational wave memory in wormhole spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D106 (Nov, 2022) 104057. https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.104057. 10

    2022 doi

  35. [44]

    Gravitational wave memory for a class of static and spherically symmetric spacetimes,

    S. Bhattacharya and S. Ghosh, “Gravitational wave memory for a class of static and spherically symmetric spacetimes,” 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.04130

    2023 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Geodesic congruences, impulsive gravitational waves and gravitational memory,

    M. O’Loughlin and H. Demirchian, “Geodesic congruences, impulsive gravitational waves and gravitational memory,” Phys. Rev. D99 no. 2, (2019) 024031, arXiv:1808.04886 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  37. [46]

    Wormholes in space-time and their use for interstellar travel: A tool for teaching general relativity,

    M. S. Morris and K. S. Thorne, “Wormholes in space-time and their use for interstellar travel: A tool for teaching general relativity,” Am. J. Phys.56 (1988) 395–412

    1988

  38. [47]

    Geodesic congruences, impulsive gravitational waves, and gravitational memory,

    M. O’Loughlin and H. Demirchian, “Geodesic congruences, impulsive gravitational waves, and gravitational memory,” Phys. Rev. D99 (Jan, 2019) 024031

    2019

  39. [48]

    Geodesic congruences in exact plane wave spacetimes and the memory effect,

    I. Chakraborty and S. Kar, “Geodesic congruences in exact plane wave spacetimes and the memory effect,” Phys. Rev. D101 (Mar, 2020) 064022. https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.064022

    2020 doi

  40. [49]

    R. M. Wald, General Relativity. Chicago Univ. Pr., Chicago, USA, 1984

    1984

  41. [50]

    Poisson, A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics

    E. Poisson, A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, 12, 2009

    2009

  42. [51]

    The Raychaudhuri equations: A Brief review,

    S. Kar and S. SenGupta, “The Raychaudhuri equations: A Brief review,” Pramana 69 (2007) 49, arXiv:gr-qc/0611123

    2007 arXiv

  43. [52]

    An introduction to the Raychaudhuri equations,

    S. Kar, “An introduction to the Raychaudhuri equations,” Resonance J. Sci. Educ.13 (2008) 319–333

    2008

  44. [53]

    Of Light and Shadows: Raychaudhuri’s Equation, the Big Bang and Black Holes,

    J. Samuel, “Of Light and Shadows: Raychaudhuri’s Equation, the Big Bang and Black Holes,” Reson. 26 no. 1, (2021) 47–60, arXiv:2012.14988 [physics.pop-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  45. [54]

    Frankel, Gravitational curvature

    T. Frankel, Gravitational curvature. W. H. Freeman, USA, 1979

    1979

  46. [55]

    Amalgamated Codazzi-Raychaudhuri identity for foliation,

    B. Carter, “Amalgamated Codazzi-Raychaudhuri identity for foliation,” Contemp. Math. 203 (1997) 207–219, arXiv:hep-th/9705083

    1997 arXiv

  47. [56]

    Covariant generalization of Codazzi-Raychaudhuri and area change equations for relativistic branes,

    E. Zafiris, “Covariant generalization of Codazzi-Raychaudhuri and area change equations for relativistic branes,” J. Geom. Phys.28 (1998) 271–288, arXiv:hep-th/9710169

    1998 arXiv

  48. [57]

    Geodesic congruences in warped spacetimes,

    S. Ghosh, A. Dasgupta, and S. Kar, “Geodesic congruences in warped spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 084001, arXiv:1008.5008 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  49. [58]

    Revisiting a family of wormholes: geometry, matter, scalar quasinormal modes and echoes,

    P. Dutta Roy, S. Aneesh, and S. Kar, “Revisiting a family of wormholes: geometry, matter, scalar quasinormal modes and echoes,” Eur. Phys. J. C80 no. 9, (2020) 850, arXiv:1910.08746 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  50. [59]

    Geodesic congruences in 5D warped Ellis–Bronnikov spacetimes,

    V. Sharma and S. Ghosh, “Geodesic congruences in 5D warped Ellis–Bronnikov spacetimes,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137 no. 8, (2022) 881, arXiv:2205.08865 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  51. [60]

    Rotating traversable wormholes,

    E. Teo, “Rotating traversable wormholes,” Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 024014, arXiv:gr-qc/9803098

    1998 arXiv

  52. [61]

    A new rotating lorentzian wormhole spacetime,

    A. Kar, S. Jana, and S. Kar, “A new rotating lorentzian wormhole spacetime,” 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.09202

    2024 arXiv

  53. [2021]

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.104010

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.