Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MeDiSumQA: Patient-Oriented Question-Answer Generation from Discharge Letters

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.03298 v1 pith:ELUXQJFS submitted 2025-02-05 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords llmsmedicalmedisumqagenerationautomatedcaredatasetdischarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

While increasing patients' access to medical documents improves medical care, this benefit is limited by varying health literacy levels and complex medical terminology. Large language models (LLMs) offer solutions by simplifying medical information. However, evaluating LLMs for safe and patient-friendly text generation is difficult due to the lack of standardized evaluation resources. To fill this gap, we developed MeDiSumQA. MeDiSumQA is a dataset created from MIMIC-IV discharge summaries through an automated pipeline combining LLM-based question-answer generation with manual quality checks. We use this dataset to evaluate various LLMs on patient-oriented question-answering. Our findings reveal that general-purpose LLMs frequently surpass biomedical-adapted models, while automated metrics correlate with human judgment. By releasing MeDiSumQA on PhysioNet, we aim to advance the development of LLMs to enhance patient understanding and ultimately improve care outcomes.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Novel Evaluation Benchmark for Medical LLMs: Illuminating Safety and Effectiveness in Clinical Domains

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new 2,069-item, 30-criterion benchmark of clinical scenarios shows six LLMs average 57.2%, with safety (54.7%) below effectiveness (62.3%) and a 13.3% drop in high-risk cases.

Pith tools