pith. sign in

arxiv: 2502.04232 · v1 · submitted 2025-02-06 · ✦ hep-lat · hep-ph

D₁ and D₂ resonances in coupled-channel scattering amplitudes from lattice QCD

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 04:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-lat hep-ph
keywords lattice QCDcharmed mesonsD1 resonancescattering amplitudesaxial-vector statescoupled channelsfinite volume spectrumD*π scattering
0
0 comments X

The pith

Lattice QCD finds D1 bound state just below D*π threshold strongly coupled in S-wave

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes isospin-1/2 charmed axial-vector scattering amplitudes in the D*π-D*η-D*_s K-bar channels using lattice QCD at a pion mass of 391 MeV. It reports an axial-vector D1 bound state just below the D*π threshold that couples strongly to S-wave D*π and influences energies up to the D*η threshold. A D1' resonance appears in the elastic D*π region with stronger D-wave coupling. A narrow tensor state in the J^P=2+ channel couples to both Dπ and D*π. In the region where D*η and D*_s K-bar open, the energy levels show significant S-wave interactions though extracted poles carry large uncertainties.

Core claim

At a light-quark mass corresponding to m_π≈391 MeV, an axial-vector D1 bound state is observed just below D*π threshold, that is strongly coupled to D*π in a relative S-wave and influences a wide energy region up to the D*η threshold. An axial-vector D1′ resonance is observed in the elastic D*π energy-region, which is coupled more strongly to D-wave D*π. A single narrow tensor state is seen in J^P=2+ coupled to both Dπ and D*π. In the region where D*η and D*_s K-bar are kinematically open, the available energy levels indicate significant S-wave interactions, with one additional state consistently arising predominantly coupled to the S-wave amplitudes.

What carries the argument

Coupled-channel scattering amplitudes for I=1/2 D*π-D*η-D*_s K-bar extracted from lattice QCD finite-volume spectra at m_π≈391 MeV

If this is right

  • The D1 bound state affects a wide energy region due to its strong S-wave coupling to D*π.
  • The D1' resonance appears with dominant D-wave coupling in the D*π elastic region.
  • A narrow J^P=2+ tensor state couples to both Dπ and D*π channels.
  • Significant S-wave interactions occur once D*η and D*_s K-bar channels open, though pole locations remain uncertain.
  • One additional state arises near the upper energy limit predominantly coupled to S-wave amplitudes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same pattern holds at physical light-quark masses, the lattice poles could map onto the experimental D1 and D1' states and their decay widths.
  • Extending the calculation to lighter pion masses while including three-hadron channels would test whether the two-hadron approximation remains valid.
  • The reported coupling strengths could be used to predict production rates in heavy-ion or B-decay experiments.
  • Similar coupled-channel analyses in the bottom sector might reveal analogous bound states below B*π threshold.

Load-bearing premise

The lowest three-hadron threshold Dππ lies high enough at this pion mass to allow treating the system rigorously with only two-hadron scattering channels.

What would settle it

Higher-statistics lattice spectra at the same quark mass showing energy levels whose extracted poles contradict the reported D1 bound state position or its S-wave coupling strength.

read the original abstract

Isospin-1/2 charmed axial-vector $D^*\pi-D^*\eta-D^*_s\bar{K}$ scattering amplitudes are computed, along with interactions in several other $I=1/2$ $J^P$ channels. Using lattice QCD, we work at a light-quark mass corresponding to $m_\pi\approx 391$ MeV, where the lowest three-hadron threshold ($D\pi\pi$) lies high enough to enable a rigorous treatment of this system considering only two-hadron scattering channels. At this light-quark mass, an axial-vector $D_1$ bound state is observed just below $D^*\pi$ threshold, that is strongly coupled to $D^*\pi$ in a relative $S$-wave and influences a wide energy region up to the $D^*\eta$ threshold. An axial-vector $D_1^\prime$ resonance is observed in the elastic $D^*\pi$ energy-region, which is coupled more strongly to $D$-wave $D^*\pi$. A single narrow tensor state is seen in $J^P=2^+$ coupled to both $D\pi$ and $D^*\pi$. In the region where $D^*\eta$ and $D^*_s\bar{K}$ are kinematically open, the available energy levels indicate significant $S$-wave interactions. Upon searching this region for poles, several possibilities exist with large uncertainties. One additional state consistently arises, predominantly coupled to the $S$-wave $D^*\pi-D^*\eta-D^*_s\bar{K}$ amplitudes around the upper energy limit of this analysis.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes isospin-1/2 charmed-meson scattering amplitudes in the axial-vector (J^P=1+) channel for the coupled D*π–D*η–D*sKbar system, together with selected other J^P channels, using lattice QCD at a single light-quark mass corresponding to m_π≈391 MeV. It reports an axial-vector D1 bound state lying just below the D*π threshold and strongly coupled to S-wave D*π, an axial-vector D1' resonance in the elastic D*π region coupled more strongly to D-wave D*π, a narrow tensor (J^P=2+) state coupled to both Dπ and D*π, and several possible additional poles in the region where D*η and D*sKbar thresholds are open, all extracted via finite-volume spectra and subsequent amplitude parametrizations.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work supplies first-principles lattice information on the spectrum and couplings of charmed resonances at an unphysical but controlled pion mass. The use of a multi-channel Lüscher-type analysis and the explicit statement that three-hadron thresholds lie sufficiently high are strengths that allow a two-body treatment; the paper thereby provides concrete, falsifiable predictions for pole positions and residues that can be compared with effective-theory models and, ultimately, with physical-mass calculations.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that “the lowest three-hadron threshold (Dππ) lies high enough to enable a rigorous treatment … considering only two-hadron scattering channels” is presented without any numerical comparison of the Dππ threshold to the highest energy level retained in the analysis or any estimate of residual three-body phase space. Because the validity of the Lüscher quantization condition and all subsequent pole searches rests on this separation, the absence of such a check is load-bearing for the reported D1, D1' and D2 results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comment on the abstract. We address the point below and will incorporate a revision to strengthen the presentation of the two-body approximation.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that “the lowest three-hadron threshold (Dππ) lies high enough to enable a rigorous treatment … considering only two-hadron scattering channels” is presented without any numerical comparison of the Dππ threshold to the highest energy level retained in the analysis or any estimate of residual three-body phase space. Because the validity of the Lüscher quantization condition and all subsequent pole searches rests on this separation, the absence of such a check is load-bearing for the reported D1, D1' and D2 results.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from an explicit numerical comparison to make the justification for the two-body treatment fully transparent. The manuscript already contains the relevant threshold and energy-level values in Section III and the associated tables; the Dππ threshold lies well above the highest finite-volume levels retained in the two-body analysis. In the revised version we will augment the abstract with a concise statement providing this comparison together with a brief estimate of the residual three-body phase-space suppression at the energies considered. This change directly addresses the referee’s concern without altering any of the reported results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; direct lattice QCD computation of scattering amplitudes

full rationale

The derivation consists of a first-principles lattice QCD evaluation of finite-volume energy levels followed by application of the Lüscher quantization condition (and extensions) to extract coupled-channel scattering amplitudes, from which resonance poles are located. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter or self-citation; the D1 and D1' poles emerge from the computed amplitudes rather than being inputs. The statement that the Dππ threshold lies sufficiently high is a methodological assumption whose validity can be checked against external mass values, but it does not create a definitional loop or rename a fitted result as a prediction. The paper is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review limits visibility into parameters; typical lattice QCD amplitude fits introduce several free parameters for phase-shift parametrization and Lüscher quantization conditions.

free parameters (2)
  • scattering amplitude fit parameters
    Parameters in the K-matrix or similar parametrization fitted to extracted energy levels
  • light quark mass tuning
    Chosen to produce m_π≈391 MeV
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Two-hadron approximation is valid because Dππ threshold is sufficiently high
    Explicitly invoked in abstract to justify restricting to two-hadron channels

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5831 in / 1265 out tokens · 106718 ms · 2026-05-23T04:12:33.458172+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Exotic $T^*_{csJ}$ and $T^*_{c\bar{s}J}$ states and coupled-channel scattering at the $SU(3)$ flavour symmetric point from lattice QCD

    hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    First lattice QCD calculation at the SU(3) flavour symmetric point finds poles in exotic charm-light meson scattering amplitudes, linking a J^P=0+ resonance to experimental T*cs0(2870)^0 and T*c s-bar0(2900) states an...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 45 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Du, F.-K

    M.-L. Du, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, B. Kubis and U.-G. Meißner, Where is the lowest charmed scalar meson?, 2012.04599

  2. [2]

    Gayer, N

    L. Gayer, N. Lang, S. M. Ryan, D. Tims, C. E. Thomas, D. J. Wilson et al., Isospin-1/2 Dπ scattering and the lightest D∗ 0 resonance from Lattice QCD, Journal of High Energy Physics 2021 (2021) 123

  3. [3]

    Particle Data Group Collaboration collaboration, Review of particle physics , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 030001

  4. [4]

    Diquark-Antidiquarks with Hidden or Open Charm and the Nature of X(3872)

    L. Maiani, F. Piccinini, A. D. Polosa and V. Riquer, Diquark-antidiquarks with hidden or open charm and the nature of X(3872) , Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 014028 [ hep-ph/0412098]

  5. [5]

    Gasser and H

    J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Chiral Perturbation Theory to One Loop , Annals Phys. 158 (1984) 142

  6. [6]

    Gasser and H

    J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Chiral Perturbation Theory: Expansions in the Mass of the Strange Quark, Nucl. Phys. B 250 (1985) 465

  7. [7]

    E. E. Jenkins and A. V. Manohar, Baryon chiral perturbation theory using a heavy fermion Lagrangian, Phys. Lett. B 255 (1991) 558

  8. [8]

    Yan, H.-Y

    T.-M. Yan, H.-Y. Cheng, C.-Y. Cheung, G.-L. Lin, Y. C. Lin and H.-L. Yu, Heavy quark symmetry and chiral dynamics , Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 1148. – 48 –

  9. [9]

    M. B. Wise, Chiral perturbation theory for hadrons containing a heavy quark , Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) R2188

  10. [10]

    T. N. Truong, Chiral Perturbation Theory and Final State Theorem , Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988) 2526

  11. [11]

    J. A. Oller and E. Oset, Chiral symmetry amplitudes in the S wave isoscalar and isovector channels and the σ, f0(980), a0(980) scalar mesons , Nucl. Phys. A 620 (1997) 438 [hep-ph/9702314]

  12. [12]

    E. E. Kolomeitsev and M. F. M. Lutz, On Heavy light meson resonances and chiral symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 582 (2004) 39 [ hep-ph/0307133]

  13. [13]

    Open-charm meson resonances with negative strangeness

    J. Hofmann and M. Lutz, Open charm meson resonances with negative strangeness , Nucl. Phys. A 733 (2004) 142 [ hep-ph/0308263]

  14. [14]

    Dynamically Generated Open and Hidden Charm Meson Systems

    D. Gamermann, E. Oset, D. Strottman and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Dynamically generated open and hidden charm meson systems , Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 074016 [ hep-ph/0612179]

  15. [15]

    Dynamically generated 0^+ heavy mesons in a heavy chiral unitary approach

    F.-K. Guo, P.-N. Shen, H.-C. Chiang, R.-G. Ping and B.-S. Zou, Dynamically generated 0+ heavy mesons in a heavy chiral unitary approach , Phys. Lett. B 641 (2006) 278 [hep-ph/0603072]

  16. [16]

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart and U.-G. Meissner, Interactions between heavy mesons and Goldstone bosons from chiral dynamics , Eur. Phys. J. A 40 (2009) 171 [ 0901.1597]

  17. [17]

    Unitarized Chiral Perturbation Theory in a finite volume: scalar meson sector

    M. D¨ oring, U.-G. Meissner, E. Oset and A. Rusetsky, Unitarized Chiral Perturbation Theory in a finite volume: Scalar meson sector , Eur. Phys. J. A47 (2011) 139 [ 1107.3988]

  18. [18]

    Albaladejo, P

    M. Albaladejo, P. Fernandez-Soler, F.-K. Guo and J. Nieves, Two-pole structure of the D∗ 0(2400), Physics Letters B 767 (2017) 465

  19. [19]

    M.-L. Du, M. Albaladejo, P. Fern´ andez-Soler, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner et al., Towards a new paradigm for heavy-light meson spectroscopy , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 094018 [1712.07957]

  20. [20]

    Meißner, Two-pole structures in QCD: Facts, not fantasy! , Symmetry 12 (2020) 981 [2005.06909]

    U.-G. Meißner, Two-pole structures in QCD: Facts, not fantasy! , Symmetry 12 (2020) 981 [2005.06909]

  21. [21]

    Hadron Spectrum collaboration, Axial-Vector D1 Hadrons in D* π Scattering from QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022) 252001 [ 2205.05026]

  22. [22]

    G. Moir, M. Peardon, S. M. Ryan, C. E. Thomas and D. J. Wilson, Coupled-Channel Dπ, Dη and Ds ¯K Scattering from Lattice QCD, JHEP 10 (2016) 011 [ 1607.07093]

  23. [23]

    G. K. Cheung, C. E. Thomas, D. J. Wilson, G. Moir, M. Peardon and S. M. Ryan, DK I = 0, D ¯K I = 0, 1 scattering and the D∗ s0(2317) from lattice QCD, 2008.06432

  24. [24]

    Hadron Spectrum collaboration, DK/Dπ scattering and an exotic virtual bound state at the SU(3) flavour symmetric point from lattice QCD , JHEP 07 (2024) 012 [ 2403.10498]

  25. [25]

    L. Liu, K. Orginos, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart and U.-G. Meissner, Interactions of charmed mesons with light pseudoscalar mesons from lattice QCD and implications on the nature of the D∗ s0(2317), Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 014508 [ 1208.4535]

  26. [26]

    $D_{s0}^*(2317)$ Meson and $D$-Meson-Kaon Scattering from Lattice QCD

    D. Mohler, C. Lang, L. Leskovec, S. Prelovsek and R. Woloshyn, D∗ s0(2317) Meson and D-Meson-Kaon Scattering from Lattice QCD , Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 222001 [1308.3175]. – 49 –

  27. [27]

    C. Lang, L. Leskovec, D. Mohler, S. Prelovsek and R. Woloshyn, Ds mesons with DK and D*K scattering near threshold , Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 034510 [ 1403.8103]

  28. [28]

    G. S. Bali, S. Collins, A. Cox and A. Sch¨ afer, Masses and decay constants of the D∗ s0(2317) and Ds1(2460) from Nf = 2 lattice QCD close to the physical point , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 074501 [1706.01247]

  29. [29]

    Alexandrou, J

    C. Alexandrou, J. Berlin, J. Finkenrath, T. Leontiou and M. Wagner, Tetraquark interpolating fields in a lattice QCD investigation of the D∗ s0(2317) meson, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 034502 [ 1911.08435]

  30. [30]

    Luscher, Volume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in Massive Quantum Field Theories

    M. Luscher, Volume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in Massive Quantum Field Theories. 2. Scattering States , Commun. Math. Phys. 105 (1986) 153

  31. [31]

    Michael, Adjoint Sources in Lattice Gauge Theory , Nucl

    C. Michael, Adjoint Sources in Lattice Gauge Theory , Nucl. Phys. B259 (1985) 58

  32. [32]

    Luscher and U

    M. Luscher and U. Wolff, How to Calculate the Elastic Scattering Matrix in Two-dimensional Quantum Field Theories by Numerical Simulation , Nucl. Phys. B339 (1990) 222

  33. [33]

    On the generalized eigenvalue method for energies and matrix elements in lattice field theory

    B. Blossier, M. Della Morte, G. von Hippel, T. Mendes and R. Sommer, On the generalized eigenvalue method for energies and matrix elements in lattice field theory , JHEP 0904 (2009) 094 [ 0902.1265]

  34. [34]

    J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, M. J. Peardon, D. G. Richards and C. E. Thomas, Highly excited and exotic meson spectrum from dynamical lattice QCD , Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 262001 [0909.0200]

  35. [35]

    Hadron Spectrum collaboration, A novel quark-field creation operator construction for hadronic physics in lattice QCD , Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 054506 [ 0905.2160]

  36. [36]

    R. G. Edwards, B. Joo and H.-W. Lin, Tuning for Three-flavors of Anisotropic Clover Fermions with Stout-link Smearing , Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 054501 [ 0803.3960]

  37. [37]

    Hadron Spectrum collaboration, First results from 2+1 dynamical quark flavors on an anisotropic lattice: Light-hadron spectroscopy and setting the strange-quark mass , Phys. Rev. D79 (2009) 034502 [ 0810.3588]

  38. [38]

    Hadron Spectrum collaboration, Flavor structure of the excited baryon spectra from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 054506 [ 1212.5236]

  39. [39]

    Hadron Spectrum collaboration, Excited and exotic charmonium spectroscopy from lattice QCD, JHEP 07 (2012) 126 [ 1204.5425]

  40. [40]

    J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, M. J. Peardon, D. G. Richards and C. E. Thomas, Toward the excited meson spectrum of dynamical QCD , Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 034508 [ 1004.4930]

  41. [41]

    C. E. Thomas, R. G. Edwards and J. J. Dudek, Helicity operators for mesons in flight on the lattice, Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 014507 [ 1107.1930]

  42. [42]

    J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards and C. E. Thomas, S and D-wave phase shifts in isospin-2 pi pi scattering from lattice QCD , Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 034031 [ 1203.6041]

  43. [43]

    A. J. Woss, J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, C. E. Thomas and D. J. Wilson, Decays of an exotic 1−+ hybrid meson resonance in QCD , 2009.10034

  44. [44]

    D. J. Wilson, J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards and C. E. Thomas, Resonances in coupled πK, ηK scattering from lattice QCD , Phys. Rev. D91 (2015) 054008 [ 1411.2004]

  45. [45]

    Hadron Spectrum collaboration, An a0 resonance in strongly coupled πη, KK scattering from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 094506 [ 1602.05122]. – 50 –

  46. [46]

    R. A. Briceno, Two-particle multichannel systems in a finite volume with arbitrary spin , Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 074507 [ 1401.3312]

  47. [47]

    Hadron Spectrum collaboration, Efficient solution of the multichannel L¨ uscher determinant condition through eigenvalue decomposition , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 114505 [2001.08474]

  48. [48]

    P. Guo, J. Dudek, R. Edwards and A. P. Szczepaniak, Coupled-channel scattering on a torus , Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 014501 [ 1211.0929]

  49. [49]

    Hadron Spectrum collaboration, Energy dependence of the ρ resonance in ππ elastic scattering from lattice QCD , Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 034505 [ 1212.0830]

  50. [50]

    Hadron Spectrum collaboration, Resonances in coupled πK − ηK scattering from quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 182001 [ 1406.4158]

  51. [51]

    R. A. Briceno, J. J. Dudek and R. D. Young, Scattering processes and resonances from lattice QCD, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (2018) 025001 [ 1706.06223]

  52. [52]

    R. A. Briceno, J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards and D. J. Wilson, Isoscalar ππ, K K, ηη scattering and the σ, f0, f2 mesons from QCD , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 054513 [ 1708.06667]

  53. [53]

    Hadron Spectrum collaboration, Scalar and Tensor Charmonium Resonances in Coupled-Channel Scattering from Lattice QCD , Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 241901 [2309.14070]

  54. [54]

    Hadron Spectrum collaboration, Charmonium χc0 and χc2 resonances in coupled-channel scattering from lattice QCD , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 114503 [ 2309.14071]

  55. [55]

    Whyte, D

    T. Whyte, D. J. Wilson and C. E. Thomas, Near-threshold states in coupled DD∗ − D∗D∗ scattering from lattice QCD , 2405.15741

  56. [56]

    Asokan, M.-N

    A. Asokan, M.-N. Tang, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, Y. Kamiya and U.-G. Meißner, Can the two-pole structure of the D∗ 0(2300) be understood from recent lattice data?, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 850 [ 2212.07856]

  57. [57]

    R. A. Brice˜ no, M. T. Hansen and S. R. Sharpe, Three-particle systems with resonant subprocesses in a finite volume , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 014516 [ 1810.01429]

  58. [58]

    M. T. Hansen and S. R. Sharpe, Lattice QCD and Three-particle Decays of Resonances, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69 (2019) 65 [ 1901.00483]

  59. [59]

    T. D. Blanton, F. Romero-L´ opez and S. R. Sharpe, Implementing the three-particle quantization condition for π+π+K+ and related systems, JHEP 02 (2022) 098 [ 2111.12734]

  60. [60]

    De Rujula, H

    A. De Rujula, H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, Charm Spectroscopy via electron-Positron Annihilation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37 (1976) 785

  61. [61]

    J. L. Rosner, P Wave Mesons with One Heavy Quark , Comments Nucl. Part. Phys. 16 (1986) 109

  62. [62]

    Godfrey and R

    S. Godfrey and R. Kokoski, The Properties of p Wave Mesons with One Heavy Quark , Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 1679

  63. [63]

    Isgur and M

    N. Isgur and M. B. Wise, Spectroscopy with heavy quark symmetry , Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 1130

  64. [64]

    M. Lu, M. B. Wise and N. Isgur, Heavy quark symmetry and D1 (2420) — > D* pi decay, Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 1553. – 51 –

  65. [65]

    W. A. Bardeen, E. J. Eichten and C. T. Hill, Chiral multiplets of heavy - light mesons , Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 054024 [ hep-ph/0305049]

  66. [66]

    Properties of the Charmed P-wave Mesons

    S. Godfrey, Properties of the charmed P-wave mesons , Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 054029 [hep-ph/0508078]

  67. [67]

    New meson spectroscopy with open charm and beauty

    P. Colangelo, F. De Fazio, F. Giannuzzi and S. Nicotri, New meson spectroscopy with open charm and beauty, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 054024 [ 1207.6940]

  68. [68]

    Axial Resonances in the Open and Hidden Charm Sectors

    D. Gamermann and E. Oset, Axial Resonances in the Open and Hidden Charm Sectors , The European Physical Journal A 33 (2007) 119 [ 0704.2314]

  69. [69]

    Dynamically generated 1^+ heavy mesons

    F.-K. Guo, P.-N. Shen and H.-C. Chiang, Dynamically generated 1+ heavy mesons, Physics Letters B 647 (2007) 133 [ hep-ph/0610008]

  70. [70]

    X.-Y. Guo, Y. Heo and M. F. M. Lutz, On chiral excitations with exotic quantum numbers , Physics Letters B 791 (2019) 86 [ 1809.01311]

  71. [71]

    R. A. Brice˜ no, C. S. R. Costa and A. W. Jackura, Partial-wave projection of relativistic three-body amplitudes, 2409.15577

  72. [72]

    Z. T. Draper and S. R. Sharpe, Three-particle formalism for multiple channels: the ηππ + KKπ system in isosymmetric QCD , JHEP 07 (2024) 083 [ 2403.20064]

  73. [73]

    A. W. Jackura and R. A. Brice˜ no, Partial-wave projection of the one-particle exchange in three-body scattering amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 096030 [ 2312.00625]

  74. [74]

    T. D. Blanton, F. Romero-L´ opez and S. R. Sharpe, I = 3 Three-Pion Scattering Amplitude from Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 032001 [ 1909.02973]

  75. [75]

    T. D. Blanton and S. R. Sharpe, Relativistic three-particle quantization condition for nondegenerate scalars, 2011.05520

  76. [76]

    Fischer, B

    M. Fischer, B. Kostrzewa, L. Liu, F. Romero-L´ opez, M. Ueding and C. Urbach, Scattering of two and three physical pions at maximal isospin from lattice QCD , 2008.03035

  77. [77]

    H. W. Hammer, J. Y. Pang and A. Rusetsky, Three particle quantization condition in a finite volume: 2. general formalism and the analysis of data , JHEP 10 (2017) 115 [ 1707.02176]

  78. [78]

    SciDAC, LHPC, UKQCD collaboration, The Chroma software system for lattice QCD , Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 140 (2005) 832 [ hep-lat/0409003]

  79. [79]

    M. A. Clark, R. Babich, K. Barros, R. C. Brower and C. Rebbi, Solving Lattice QCD systems of equations using mixed precision solvers on GPUs , Comput. Phys. Commun. 181 (2010) 1517 [0911.3191]

  80. [80]

    Parallelizing the QUDA Library for Multi-GPU Calculations in Lattice Quantum Chromodynamics

    R. Babich, M. A. Clark and B. Joo, Parallelizing the QUDA Library for Multi-GPU Calculations in Lattice Quantum Chromodynamics , in SC 10 (Supercomputing 2010) New Orleans, Louisiana, November 13-19, 2010 , 2010, http://www1.jlab.org/Ul/publications/view pub.cfm?pub id=10186 [1011.0024]

Showing first 80 references.