Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 31 references

Efficient passivation of III-As(P) photonic interfaces

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Annealing dry-etched III-As(P) quantum-well ridges under phosphine gas lowers the sidewall surface recombination velocity from 15,000 to 2,000 cm/s, beating the standard sulfur-based passivation.

desk verdict A useful head-to-head comparison of PH3 annealing against standard passivation routes, but the quantitative s values need uncertainty bars and a dead-layer check before they can be quoted. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.08616 v1 pith:FBIN4CAI submitted 2025-02-12 physics.optics cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Yury Berdnikov , Pawe{l} Holewa , Aurimas Sakanas , Jan Miko{l}aj Śmigiel , Pawe{l} Mrowiński , Emilia Zięba-Ostój , Kresten Yvind , Alexander Huck
show 2 more authors
Marcin Syperek Elizaveta Semenova
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticscond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords surfacepassivationphosphineannealingIII-Vsemiconductorsquantumwellstime-resolvedphotoluminescencerecombinationvelocitydryetchingMOVPE
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a short anneal under phosphine (PH3) inside an MOVPE reactor heals the damage that dry etching leaves on the sidewalls of InP-based quantum-well photonic structures. The treatment replaces near-surface arsenic with phosphorus, forming a wider-bandgap surface layer that suppresses non-radiative recombination and reduces surface charge density. Time-resolved photoluminescence measurements give a sidewall surface recombination velocity of about 2×$10^{3}$ cm/s after PH3 annealing, an order of magnitude lower than the 1.5×$10^{4}$ cm/s of as-etched samples and lower than the 5×$10^{3}$ cm/s of the standard (NH4)2S-plus-Al2O3 passivation. Only full InP regrowth, which is costly and limits device shape, performs better with 5×$10^{2}$ cm/s. If these numbers hold, the method offers a practical, shape-preserving passivation route for nanophotonic and quantum-photonic devices that cannot tolerate wet etching.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the in-situ annealing of dry-etched ridges under phosphine flux inside an MOVPE chamber, which substitutes phosphorus for near-surface arsenic and creates a wider-bandgap, defect-poor surface layer. The quantitative workhorse is a time-resolved photoluminescence model that couples Shockley-Read-Hall surface recombination with band bending at the sidewall; the model yields a closed-form decay law via the Lambert W function and introduces the dimensionless parameter c, proportional to the square of the surface charge density. Fitting c to decay curves and plotting the high-injection recombination rate versus 2/w yields the reported surface recombination velocities.

What would settle it

Measure the sidewall recombination velocity on identical PH3-annealed ridges using a method that does not rely on the width-slope fit, such as scanning the TRPL decay as a function of distance from a single sidewall, or check whether the fitted s stays constant when the ridge-width range or excitation intensity is changed. If the apparent surface recombination velocity shifts with intensity or width selection, the assumed linear decomposition breaks down. Alternatively, directly probe the sidewall surface potential with Kelvin probe microscopy: the model predicts c ≈ 0.01 for PH3-annealed samples, so finding a surface charge density consistent with c ≈ 0.8 would falsify the reduced-charge claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that annealing dry-etched InP/InGaAlAs/InGaAsP quantum-well ridges under PH3 flux at 600 °C for 10 minutes eliminates surface and subsurface defects introduced by inductively coupled plasma etching and subsequent oxidation, thereby reducing the sidewall surface recombination velocity s from 1.5×$10^{4}$ cm/s (as etched) to 2×$10^{3}$ cm/s. The paper also claims that this treatment reduces the sidewall surface charge density, as inferred from a new time-resolved photoluminescence model that accounts for band bending at the surface. With a charged surface, the effective recombination rate grows nonlinearly with carrier density; the authors show that at the high-injection intensities used for the width-slope analysis, PH3-annealed samples behave as if the surface charge parameter c is about 0.010±0.005, compared to roughly 0.6–0.8 for as-etched or sulfur-treated samples. The method is presented as a practical alternative to wet-chemical passivation for nanophotonic structures whose delicate shapes would be damaged by wet etching.

Load-bearing premise

The reported surface recombination velocities assume that the total recombination rate is exactly the sum of a width-independent bulk rate and a surface term proportional to 2/w, and that the slopes used in Fig. 4 are taken in the high-injection regime where the surface recombination rate has already saturated and becomes independent of carrier density.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • PH3 annealing can be applied to arbitrary nanophotonic shapes, including photonic crystals and extreme-confinement cavities, since it does not require wet etching or regrowth.
  • The surface recombination velocity of 2×10^3 cm/s is low enough to support room-temperature continuous-wave operation of nanolasers, as already demonstrated in related structures.
  • The reduction of sidewall surface charge density should lower charge noise and spectral diffusion in quantum-well and quantum-dot photonic devices.
  • Encapsulation with a wider-bandgap material preserves the device band structure during PH3 annealing, mitigating band-bending effects at the etched sidewalls.
  • The surface-charge-dependent model provides a quantitative way to compare passivation methods from TRPL data, not only by surface recombination velocity but also by the residual surface charge parameter c.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension would be to vary the PH3 annealing temperature and duration to map the process window; the model predicts that incomplete arsenic-to-phosphorus exchange leaves a residual surface charge visible as a larger c parameter.
  • The inference that PH3 annealing reduces surface charge density rests on a single fitted parameter; an independent measurement of the sidewall surface potential, for example by scanning Kelvin probe microscopy on identical ridges, would directly confirm or refute the c-value interpretation.
  • If the improvement comes primarily from the wider-bandgap phosphidized surface rather than from defect healing, the same annealing step might transfer to other III-As(P) systems such as GaAs or InGaAs, where arsenic-to-phosphorus exchange follows the same chemistry.
  • Because the PH3 anneal is already performed inside an MOVPE reactor, it could be inserted into existing epitaxial flows as a drop-in step before regrowth or encapsulation, extending the range of devices that can be passivated without a full regrowth.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a surface passivation method for dry-etched III-As(P) nanostructures: annealing under PH3 flux in an MOVPE chamber to heal etch-induced surface and subsurface defects. The authors compare this method against as-etched samples, (NH4)2S + Al2O3 treatment, and InP regrowth, using time-resolved photoluminescence (TRPL) on ridge arrays of varying width. From the width dependence of the recombination rate they extract surface recombination velocities: 1.5e4 cm/s for as-etched, 5e3 cm/s for sulfide+Al2O3, 2e3 cm/s for PH3 annealed, and 5e2 cm/s for InP regrowth. A secondary claim is that the PH3 anneal reduces sidewall surface charge density, inferred by fitting a new TRPL model that includes surface-charge-induced band bending. The paper concludes that PH3 annealing is a practical passivation route for nanophotonic structures for which wet etching is incompatible.

Significance. If the central quantitative comparison holds, the work offers a practically valuable passivation route for nanophotonic devices, with a clear technological advantage over wet-chemical methods that damage sensitive cavity shapes. The systematic comparison of four treatments on identical ridge arrays is a strength, as is the use of the standard width-dependent SRV extraction approach. The paper also explicitly attempts to model the effect of surface charges on TRPL decays, which is a useful extension beyond the common Eq. (1) analysis. However, the quantitative claims currently lack adequate support: no uncertainties are reported for the fitted SRVs, the extraction procedure from non-exponential decays is not fully specified, and the surface-charge model contains a dimensional inconsistency. These issues need to be resolved before the ranking of passivation methods can be considered firmly established.

major comments (4)
  1. [§Results and Discussion, Eq. (1) and Fig. 4, Table I] The central SRV comparison assumes that the optically active QW width equals the physical ridge width w and that 1/tau_bulk is the same for all widths. Dry etching is known to create a subsurface damaged layer; if a dead layer of thickness d on each sidewall is non-radiative, Eq. (1) should read 1/tau = 1/tau_bulk + 2s/(w-2d), with d possibly treatment-dependent. For the 200 nm ridges, a 15 nm dead layer changes the denominator by 17%, and the bias differs between treatments if PH3 annealing heals the damage. The paper provides no TEM or extended width series to check the linearity of 1/tau versus 2/w, and no uncertainties on the fitted s values in Table I. Since the PH3-vs-sulfide ranking rests on a factor of 2.5, the missing uncertainty analysis and dead-layer check are load-bearing.
  2. [§Surface recombination rate and Fig. 4] The procedure to obtain the recombination rate 1/tau is not sufficiently specified. The text states that one should use 'recombination rates at higher intensities' and that 'this recombination rate can be found as the slopes of the TRPL curve in the log scale at the maximum intensity.' For the stretched exponential I = I0 exp(-alpha t^beta) with beta < 1, the logarithmic slope at t=0 is infinite (or ill-defined if the measurement has finite time resolution). The authors do not describe the fitting window, the binning, or how the initial slope is evaluated. Without this, the data in Fig. 4 and the values in Table I are not reproducible, and the comparison could be sensitive to the chosen analysis window.
  3. [Appendix B, Eqs. (7) and (8)] There is a dimensional inconsistency in the surface-charge model. Equation (7) gives Rsurf with units of cm^-2 s^-1, but it is substituted into the volume rate equation dN/dt = -Rsurf in Appendix B, yielding an equation with mismatched dimensions. The missing factor of 2/w (or an equivalent geometric factor) means that the parameter S0 in Eq. (8) does not have the dimensions of a surface recombination velocity, and the argument S0 t/2 is not dimensionless. This does not directly affect the primary SRV extraction from Fig. 4, but it invalidates the physical interpretation of the fitted parameters and undermines the secondary claim of surface charge reduction.
  4. [§Surface recombination rate, Fig. 3] The secondary claim—that PH3 annealing reduces sidewall surface charge density—is inferred from the fitted parameter c in Eq. (8), but the fits are performed on individual TRPL curves (e.g., 200 nm wide ridges) without reporting S0 or the initial carrier density N0. The parameter c depends on N_s^2/N0, and N0 is not determined independently; without it, the quoted c values (0.8 vs 0.01) cannot be converted into a quantitative reduction of surface charge density, and the fits may be degenerate between c and S0. The paper should provide confidence intervals for c, an estimate of N0, or a direct measurement of surface charge to support this claim.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 4] The figure should include the individual data points, the fitted lines, and error bars on 1/tau; currently the reader cannot assess the scatter or the quality of the linear fits.
  2. [Table I] The surface recombination velocities are quoted without uncertainties or the number of ridges used per width; please add standard errors or confidence intervals.
  3. [Data Availability] The data statement says the data 'may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.' For a quantitative claim of this kind, depositing the TRPL decay curves and extracted lifetimes in a public repository would strengthen reproducibility.
  4. [Methods, epitaxial structure] The introduction refers to 'InP/InGaAlAs/InGaAsP quantum wells' while the Methods section lists specific compositions (In0.78Ga0.22As0.85P0.15/In0.46Al0.29Ga0.25As). Please clarify which layer is the QW and which is the barrier, and whether the InP cladding forms the ridge sidewalls.
  5. [Eq. (8) derivation] The Lambert W-function solution is stated without derivation in the main text. A short derivation or a reference to the Appendix would help the reader follow the model.
  6. [Fig. 3a] The reported fits for c are given as 0.8±0.4, 0.6±0.2, and 0.010±0.005, but the corresponding S0 values and the initial carrier density N0 are not reported. Please include these fit parameters and their uncertainties.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the reported SRV values come from an independent width-slope analysis, and the surface-charge parameter c is a fitted model parameter, not a self-referential prediction.

full rationale

The central results in Table I are obtained from the standard width-dependent analysis of Eq. (1), where 1/tau is plotted against 2/w in Fig. 4 and the slope gives s. This extraction is independent of the surface-charge model in Eqs. (7)-(8); the fitted parameter c is used only in the separate TRPL model of Eq. (8) and Fig. 3a. The statement that PH3 annealing reduces sidewall charge density is an interpretation of the fitted c being smaller (0.010 vs 0.8 for as-etched), and since c is defined as e^2/(4*eps*eps0*kT)*Ns^2/N0 in Appendix B, this is a model-based parameter inference rather than a prediction forced by the input. The s values do not feed back into or depend on c. The conclusion's reference to stable CW nanolaser operation cites refs. 17 and 31, which are self-citations, but this is an application note supporting potential impact and does not enter the derivation of the SRV values. The possible dead-layer effect raised in the skeptical view is a modeling assumption about the effective active width, not a circularity: Eq. (1) defines s from the slope, and the paper never defines the width in terms of the outcome. Therefore, no load-bearing step reduces to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central SRV claim rests on the standard inverse-width partition of Eq. (1). The surface-charge model adds fitted parameters c and S0 and depends on assumptions about surface charge constancy and quasi-Fermi levels. No new physical entities are introduced. The biggest ledger cost is that the key numbers are fitted without reported uncertainties and the surface-charge inference requires an unmeasured N0.

free parameters (4)
  • Surface recombination velocity s for each treatment = As etched: 1.5e4 cm/s; (NH4)2S+Al2O3: 5e3 cm/s; PH3 annealed: 2e3 cm/s; InP regrowth: 5e2 cm/s
    These are the slopes of linear fits in Fig. 4 using Eq. (1). They are the central quantitative result and are reported without uncertainties.
  • Bulk recombination rate 1/tau_bulk = Not reported
    The intercept of the linear fits in Fig. 4. It enters Eq. (1) and must be fitted, but no values are given.
  • Surface charge parameter c = 0.8 +/- 0.4 as etched; 0.6 +/- 0.2 sulfide; 0.010 +/- 0.005 PH3; near zero InP regrowth
    Fitted to TRPL curves in Fig. 3a using Eq. (8). The paper interprets a smaller c as reduced sidewall surface charge, but c = e^2 Ns^2/(4 epsilon epsilon0 kT N0), so N0 must be known to isolate Ns.
  • Surface recombination rate prefactor S0 = Not reported
    S0 appears in Eq. (8) and must be determined when fitting the TRPL curves in Fig. 3a, but the paper does not report these values.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Quasi-Fermi level approximation with exponential carrier densities near the surface (ps = pb exp(vs), ns = nb exp(-vs)).
    Used in Appendix A and Eq. (5) to express surface carrier densities in terms of the surface potential vs.
  • domain assumption Surface defects are fully ionized, so the surface charge density Qs = eNs is constant and independent of carrier concentration.
    Invoked in the derivation after Eq. (6) to simplify the relation between Qs and the surface potential. If this fails, the model's c parameter has a different meaning.
  • domain assumption Equal electron and hole surface recombination rates (Sp = Sn = S0) and high-injection with nb = pb = N.
    Stated before Eq. (7) and used in Appendix B to reduce the Shockley-Read-Hall expression to Eq. (7).
  • domain assumption The total recombination rate partitions as 1/tau = 1/tau_bulk + 2s/w with a width-independent bulk lifetime.
    This is Eq. (1), the foundation of the surface recombination velocity extraction in Fig. 4. It assumes identical material quality across ridge widths and no additional size-dependent damage.
  • domain assumption At the carrier densities used to extract s, surface recombination is linear in carrier density (band bending is effectively screened).
    The paper states that for a fair comparison one should use recombination rates at higher intensities, where the ratio in Fig. 3c stabilizes. This is load-bearing for interpreting the slopes in Fig. 4 as s values.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Efficient passivation of III-As(P) photonic interfaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FBIN4CAI

@misc{pith2026250208616,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Efficient passivation of III-As(P) photonic interfaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FBIN4CAI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.08616}
}
abstract

Surface effects can significantly impact the performance of nanophotonic and quantum photonic devices, especially as the device dimensions are reduced. In this work, we propose and investigate a novel approach to surface passivation to mitigate these challenges in photonic nanostructures with III-As(P) quantum wells defined by a dry etching process. The nanostructures are annealed under the phosphine (PH$_3$) ambient inside a metal-organic vapor phase epitaxy chamber to eliminate surface and subsurface defects induced during the dry etching and subsequent oxidation of the etched sidewalls. Moreover, encapsulation of the active material with a wider bandgap material allows for maintaining the band structure of the device, mitigating band bending effects. Our findings reveal an almost order of magnitude reduction in the surface recombination velocity from $2 \times 10^3 \, \mathrm{cm/s}$ for the PH$_3$ annealing compared to $1.5 \times 10^4 \, \mathrm{cm/s}$ for the non-passivated structures and $5 \times 10^3 \, \mathrm{cm/s}$ for the standard method based on (NH$_4$)$_2$S wet treatment followed by Al$_2$O$_3$ encapsulation. A further reduction to $5 \times 10^2 \, \mathrm{cm/s}$ is achieved for the InP-regrown samples. Additionally, we develop a model accounting for the impact of surface charges in the analysis of time-resolved photoluminescence curves and demonstrate that the proposed passivation method effectively reduces the surface charge density on the sidewalls of the studied quantum well-based photonic nanostructures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.08616 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Analysis of the TRPL decays for ridges with width from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Recombination rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Mørk , author M

    author author J. Mørk , author M. Xiong , author K. Seegert , author M. Marchal , author G. Dong , author E. Dimopoulos , author E. Semenova , author K. Yvind ,\ and\ author Y. Yu ,\ title title Nanostructured Semiconductor Lasers , \ https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2024.3483900 journal journal IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. \ volume 31 ,\ pages 1--17 ...

    work page arXiv

  2. [2]

    author author L. A. \ Coldren , author S. W. \ Corzine ,\ and\ author M. L. \ Mashanovitch ,\ @noop title Diode lasers and photonic integrated circuits ,\ Vol.\ volume 218 \ ( publisher John Wiley & Sons ,\ year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Laukkanen , author M

    author author P. Laukkanen , author M. Punkkinen , author M. Kuzmin , author K. Kokko , author X. Liu , author B. Radfar , author V. V \"a h \"a nissi , author H. Savin , author A. Tukiainen , author T. Hakkarainen , et al. ,\ title title Bridging the gap between surface physics and photonics , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ad2ac9 journal journal Re...

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ad2ac9

  4. [4]

    Manna , author H

    author author S. Manna , author H. Huang , author S. F. C. \ da Silva , author C. Schimpf , author M. B. \ Rota , author B. Lehner , author M. Reindl , author R. Trotta ,\ and\ author A. Rastelli ,\ title title Surface passivation and oxide encapsulation to improve optical properties of a single GaAs quantum dot close to the surface , \ https://doi.org/10...

    arXiv

  5. [5]

    Robertson , author Y

    author author J. Robertson , author Y. Guo ,\ and\ author L. Lin ,\ title title Defect state passivation at III-V oxide interfaces for complementary metal--oxide--semiconductor devices , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4913832 journal journal J. Appl. Phys. \ volume 117 ,\ pages 112806 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4913832

  6. [6]

    \ Seong \ and\ author H

    author author T.-Y. \ Seong \ and\ author H. Amano ,\ title title Surface passivation of light emitting diodes: From nano-size to conventional mesa-etched devices , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100765 journal journal Surf. Interfaces \ volume 21 ,\ pages 100765 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    work page arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Djie , author T

    author author H. Djie , author T. Mei , author J. Arokiaraj , author C. Sookdhis , author S. F. \ Yu , author L. Ang ,\ and\ author X. Tang ,\ title title Experimental and theoretical analysis of argon plasma-enhanced quantum-well intermixing , \ https://doi.org/10.1109/JQE.2003.821542 journal journal IEEE J. Quantum Electron. \ volume 40 ,\ pages 166--17...

    work page arXiv

  8. [8]

    Oigawa , author J.-F

    author author H. Oigawa , author J.-F. \ Fan , author Y. Nannichi , author H. Sugahara ,\ and\ author M. Oshima ,\ title title Universal passivation effect of (NH _4 ) _2 S _x treatment on the surface of III-V compound semiconductors , \ https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.30.L322 journal journal Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. \ volume 30 ,\ pages L322 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1143/jjap.30.l322

Show all 31 references
  1. [9]

    Amarnath , author R

    author author K. Amarnath , author R. Grover , author S. Kanakaraju ,\ and\ author P.-T. \ Ho ,\ title title Electrically pumped InGaAsP-InP microring optical amplifiers and lasers with surface passivation , \ https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2005.857596 journal journal IEEE Photon...

  2. [10]

    author author P. A. \ Alekseev , author M. S. \ Dunaevskiy , author V. P. \ Ulin , author T. V. \ Lvova , author D. O. \ Filatov , author A. V. \ Nezhdanov , author A. I. \ Mashin ,\ and\ author V. L. \ Berkovits ,\ title title Nitride surface passivation of GaAs nanowires: im...

    doi

  3. [11]

    Guha , author F

    author author B. Guha , author F. Marsault , author F. Cadiz , author L. Morgenroth , author V. Ulin , author V. Berkovitz , author A. Lema \^ tre , author C. Gomez , author A. Amo , author S. Combri \'e , et al. ,\ title title Surface-enhanced gallium arsenide photonic resona...

    doi

  4. [12]

    Higuera-Rodriguez , author B

    author author A. Higuera-Rodriguez , author B. Romeira , author S. Birindelli , author L. Black , author E. Smalbrugge , author P. Van Veldhoven , author W. Kessels , author M. Smit ,\ and\ author A. Fiore ,\ title title Ultralow surface recombination velocity in passivated In...

    doi

  5. [13]

    Crosnier , author A

    author author G. Crosnier , author A. Bazin , author V. Ardizzone , author P. Monnier , author R. Raj ,\ and\ author F. Raineri ,\ title title Subduing surface recombination for continuous-wave operation of photonic crystal nanolasers integrated on Silicon waveguides , \ https...

    doi

  6. [14]

    Hinkle , author A

    author author C. Hinkle , author A. Sonnet , author E. Vogel , author S. McDonnell , author G. Hughes , author M. Milojevic , author B. Lee , author F. Aguirre-Tostado , author K. Choi , author H. Kim , et al. ,\ title title GaAs interfacial self-cleaning by atomic layer depos...

    doi

  7. [15]

    Timm , author A

    author author R. Timm , author A. R. \ Head , author S. Yngman , author J. V. \ Knutsson , author M. Hjort , author S. R. \ McKibbin , author A. Troian , author O. Persson , author S. Urpelainen , author J. Knudsen , et al. ,\ title title Self-cleaning and surface chemical rea...

    doi

  8. [16]

    Boroditsky , author I

    author author M. Boroditsky , author I. Gontijo , author M. Jackson , author R. Vrijen , author E. Yablonovitch , author T. Krauss , author C.-C. \ Cheng , author A. Scherer , author R. Bhat ,\ and\ author M. Krames ,\ title title Surface recombination measurements on III--V c...

    doi

  9. [17]

    Xiong , author R

    author author M. Xiong , author R. E. \ Christiansen , author F. Schr \" o der , author Y. Yu , author L. N. \ Casses , author E. Semenova , author K. Yvind , author N. Stenger , author O. Sigmund ,\ and\ author J. M rk ,\ title title Experimental realization of deep sub-wavel...

    doi

  10. [18]

    Yoon , author Y

    author author S. Yoon , author Y. Moon , author T.-W. \ Lee , author E. Yoon ,\ and\ author Y. D. \ Kim ,\ title title Effects of As/P exchange reaction on the formation of InAs/InP quantum dots , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.123746 journal journal Appl. Phys. Lett. \ volume 74...

    doi

  11. [19]

    Berdnikov , author P

    author author Y. Berdnikov , author P. Holewa , author S. Kadkhodazadeh , author J. M. \ \' S migiel , author A. Sakanas , author A. Frackowiak , author K. Yvind , author M. Syperek ,\ and\ author E. Semenova ,\ title title Near-critical Stranski-Krastanov growth of InAs/InP q...

    doi

  12. [20]

    Sugino , author S

    author author T. Sugino , author S. Nozu ,\ and\ author S. Nakajima ,\ title title Phosphidization of GaAs by a remote phosphine plasma process and its application to surface passivation of GaAs metal-semiconductor field-effect transistors , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.123992 ...

    doi

  13. [21]

    Haggren , author H

    author author T. Haggren , author H. Jiang , author J.-P. \ Kakko , author T. Huhtio , author V. Dhaka , author E. Kauppinen ,\ and\ author H. Lipsanen ,\ title title Strong surface passivation of GaAs nanowires with ultrathin InP and GaP capping layers , \ https://doi.org/10....

    doi

  14. [22]

    author author A. Sakanas ,\ title Buried Heterostructure Photonic Crystal Lasers ,\ @noop type Phd thesis ,\ school Technical University of Denmark ( year 2019 ),\ note available at https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/buried-heterostructure-photonic-crystal-lasers NoStop

    2019

  15. [23]

    Dimopoulos , author A

    author author E. Dimopoulos , author A. Sakanas , author A. Marchevsky , author M. Xiong , author Y. Yu , author E. Semenova , author J. M rk ,\ and\ author K. Yvind ,\ title title Electrically‐Driven Photonic Crystal Lasers with Ultra‐low Threshold , \ https://doi.org/10.1002...

    doi

  16. [24]

    author author N. M. \ Andrade , author S. Hooten , author Y. Kim , author J. Kim , author E. Yablonovitch ,\ and\ author M. C. \ Wu ,\ title title Sub-50 cm/s surface recombination velocity in InGaAsP/InP ridges , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0062824 journal journal Appl. Phys....

    doi

  17. [25]

    Xing , author L

    author author Y. Xing , author L. Wang , author D. Yang , author Z. Wang , author Z. Hao , author C. Sun , author B. Xiong , author Y. Luo , author Y. Han , author J. Wang , et al. ,\ title title A novel model on time-resolved photoluminescence measurements of polar InGaN/GaN ...

    doi

  18. [26]

    Johnston ,\ title title Stretched exponential relaxation arising from a continuous sum of exponential decays , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.184430 journal journal Phys

    author author D. Johnston ,\ title title Stretched exponential relaxation arising from a continuous sum of exponential decays , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.184430 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 74 ,\ pages 184430 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    doi

  19. [27]

    Shockley \ and\ author W

    author author W. Shockley \ and\ author W. Read Jr ,\ title title Statistics of the recombinations of holes and electrons , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.87.835 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 87 ,\ pages 835 ( year 1952 ) NoStop

    doi

  20. [28]

    author author R. N. \ Hall ,\ title title Electron-hole recombination in germanium , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.87.387 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 87 ,\ pages 387 ( year 1952 ) NoStop

    1952 doi

  21. [29]

    M \"o nch ,\ @noop title Semiconductor surfaces and interfaces ,\ Vol

    author author W. M \"o nch ,\ @noop title Semiconductor surfaces and interfaces ,\ Vol. volume 26 \ ( publisher Springer Science & Business Media ,\ year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013

  22. [30]

    L \"u th ,\ @noop title Surfaces and interfaces of solid materials \ ( publisher Springer Science & Business Media ,\ year 2013 ) NoStop

    author author H. L \"u th ,\ @noop title Surfaces and interfaces of solid materials \ ( publisher Springer Science & Business Media ,\ year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013

  23. [31]

    Xiong , author Y

    author author M. Xiong , author Y. Yu , author Y. Berdnikov , author S. K. \ Borregaard , author A. H. \ Dubr \'e , author R. E. \ Christiansen , author E. Semenova , author K. Yvind ,\ and\ author J. M rk ,\ title title Room-Temperature Continuous-Wave Operation of a Nanolase...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.