REVIEW 2 cited by
Towards Watermarking of Open-Source LLMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
While watermarks for closed LLMs have matured and have been included in large-scale deployments, these methods are not applicable to open-source models, which allow users full control over the decoding process. This setting is understudied yet critical, given the rising performance of open-source models. In this work, we lay the foundation for systematic study of open-source LLM watermarking. For the first time, we explicitly formulate key requirements, including durability against common model modifications such as model merging, quantization, or finetuning, and propose a concrete evaluation setup. Given the prevalence of these modifications, durability is crucial for an open-source watermark to be effective. We survey and evaluate existing methods, showing that they are not durable. We also discuss potential ways to improve their durability and highlight remaining challenges. We hope our work enables future progress on this important problem.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Making Open-Source Text LLM Watermarks Durable Against Merging
A new training method, Merge-Adversarial Training, makes watermarks embedded in open-source LLMs survive model merging, boosting post-merge detection by up to 51 percentage points.
-
From Construction to Injection: Edit-Based Fingerprints for Large Language Models
A three-stage LLM fingerprinting pipeline (multilingual low-perplexity triggers, edit-based injection with adversarial suppression, and subspace-aware fine-tuning regularization) reports robust and persistent ownershi...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.