Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

BalanceBenchmark: A Survey for Multimodal Imbalance Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.10816 v4 pith:Q2MLCFZB submitted 2025-02-15 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords imbalancebalancebenchmarkmultimodaldifferentmethodsproblemcomparisonscomplexity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimodal learning has gained attention for its capacity to integrate information from different modalities. However, it is often hindered by the multimodal imbalance problem, where certain modality dominates while others remain underutilized. Although recent studies have proposed various methods to alleviate this problem, they lack comprehensive and fair comparisons. In this paper, we systematically categorize various mainstream multimodal imbalance algorithms into four groups based on the strategies they employ to mitigate imbalance. To facilitate a comprehensive evaluation of these methods, we introduce BalanceBenchmark, a benchmark including multiple widely used multidimensional datasets and evaluation metrics from three perspectives: performance, imbalance degree, and complexity. To ensure fair comparisons, we have developed a modular and extensible toolkit that standardizes the experimental workflow across different methods. Based on the experiments using BalanceBenchmark, we have identified several key insights into the characteristics and advantages of different method groups in terms of performance, balance degree and computational complexity. We expect such analysis could inspire more efficient approaches to address the imbalance problem in the future, as well as foundation models. The code of the toolkit is available at https://github.com/GeWu-Lab/BalanceBenchmark.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MLLMs are Deeply Affected by Modality Bias

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A position paper with a case study showing that multimodal LLMs rely on language priors and underuse visual input, together with a research roadmap and calls for balanced training.

Pith tools