Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Can't See the Forest for the Trees: Benchmarking Multimodal Safety Awareness for Multimodal LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.11184 v2 pith:RKBWFDVS submitted 2025-02-16 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CVcs.MM

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CVcs.MM
keywords safetymodelsmultimodalawarenessmllmsunsafemmsafeawaresafe
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have expanded the capabilities of traditional language models by enabling interaction through both text and images. However, ensuring the safety of these models remains a significant challenge, particularly in accurately identifying whether multimodal content is safe or unsafe-a capability we term safety awareness. In this paper, we introduce MMSafeAware, the first comprehensive multimodal safety awareness benchmark designed to evaluate MLLMs across 29 safety scenarios with 1500 carefully curated image-prompt pairs. MMSafeAware includes both unsafe and over-safety subsets to assess models abilities to correctly identify unsafe content and avoid over-sensitivity that can hinder helpfulness. Evaluating nine widely used MLLMs using MMSafeAware reveals that current models are not sufficiently safe and often overly sensitive; for example, GPT-4V misclassifies 36.1% of unsafe inputs as safe and 59.9% of benign inputs as unsafe. We further explore three methods to improve safety awareness-prompting-based approaches, visual contrastive decoding, and vision-centric reasoning fine-tuning-but find that none achieve satisfactory performance. Our findings highlight the profound challenges in developing MLLMs with robust safety awareness, underscoring the need for further research in this area. All the code and data will be publicly available to facilitate future research.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. EVADE-Bench: Multimodal Benchmark for Evaluating and Enhancing Evasive Content Detection

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark of 2,833 evasive text samples and 13,961 images shows current LLMs and VLMs frequently miss veiled policy violations in Chinese e-commerce ads.

Pith tools