Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

DR.GAP: Mitigating Bias in Large Language Models using Gender-Aware Prompting with Demonstration and Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.11603 v1 pith:W35TDWA4 submitted 2025-02-17 cs.CL cs.AI

DR.GAP: Mitigating Bias in Large Language Models using Gender-Aware Prompting with Demonstration and Reasoning

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords biasmodelslanguagemodelreasoningdemonstrationgendergender-aware
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong natural language processing capabilities but also inherit and amplify societal biases, including gender bias, raising fairness concerns. Existing debiasing methods face significant limitations: parameter tuning requires access to model weights, prompt-based approaches often degrade model utility, and optimization-based techniques lack generalizability. To address these challenges, we propose DR.GAP (Demonstration and Reasoning for Gender-Aware Prompting), an automated and model-agnostic approach that mitigates gender bias while preserving model performance. DR.GAP selects bias-revealing examples and generates structured reasoning to guide models toward more impartial responses. Extensive experiments on coreference resolution and QA tasks across multiple LLMs (GPT-3.5, Llama3, and Llama2-Alpaca) demonstrate its effectiveness, generalization ability, and robustness. DR.GAP can generalize to vision-language models (VLMs), achieving significant bias reduction.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Mitigating Prompt-Induced Cognitive Biases in General-Purpose AI for Software Engineering

    cs.SE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A prompting method that forces GPAI models to state SE best practices before deciding reduces prompt-induced cognitive biases by 51% on average across eight tested biases.