Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Code-Vision: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs Logic Understanding and Code Generation Capabilities

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.11829 v1 pith:WUQW62N4 submitted 2025-02-17 cs.CL cs.AIcs.SE

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.SE
keywords code-visionmllmsevaluatemodelsmultimodalopen-sourcealgorithmcapabilities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper introduces Code-Vision, a benchmark designed to evaluate the logical understanding and code generation capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). It challenges MLLMs to generate a correct program that fulfills specific functionality requirements based on a given flowchart, which visually represents the desired algorithm or process. Code-Vision comprises three subsets: HumanEval-V, Algorithm, and MATH, which evaluate MLLMs' coding abilities across basic programming, algorithmic, and mathematical problem-solving domains. Our experiments evaluate 12 MLLMs on Code-Vision. Experimental results demonstrate that there is a large performance difference between proprietary and open-source models. On Hard problems, GPT-4o can achieve 79.3% pass@1, but the best open-source model only achieves 15%. Further experiments reveal that Code-Vision can pose unique challenges compared to other multimodal reasoning benchmarks MMCode and MathVista. We also explore the reason for the poor performance of the open-source models. All data and codes are available at https://github.com/wanghanbinpanda/CodeVision.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum Circuit Vision: Cost-Aware Evaluation of Visual AI Agents for Quantum Code Generation

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    On a 132-circuit visual quantum-to-code benchmark, Claude Sonnet matches Opus accuracy at ~18% cost, depth predicts failure better than qubit count, CoT does not help, and cascade routing reaches 84% accuracy at 38% cost.

  2. SVRepair: Structured Visual Reasoning for Automated Program Repair

    cs.SE 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A multimodal program-repair system that converts bug screenshots into semantic scene graphs and iteratively crops to bug regions, reporting 36.47% on SWE-Bench M, 38.02% on MMCode, and 95.12% on CodeVision.

  3. Multilingual Multimodal Software Developer for Code Generation

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 7B vision-language model trained on synthetic diagram-to-code data outperforms several larger open-weight models on a new 10-language UML/flowchart code-generation benchmark.

Pith tools