REVIEW 1 cited by
Symmetric Rank-One Quasi-Newton Methods for Deep Learning Using Cubic Regularization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Stochastic gradient descent and other first-order variants, such as Adam and AdaGrad, are commonly used in the field of deep learning due to their computational efficiency and low-storage memory requirements. However, these methods do not exploit curvature information. Consequently, iterates can converge to saddle points or poor local minima. On the other hand, Quasi-Newton methods compute Hessian approximations which exploit this information with a comparable computational budget. Quasi-Newton methods re-use previously computed iterates and gradients to compute a low-rank structured update. The most widely used quasi-Newton update is the L-BFGS, which guarantees a positive semi-definite Hessian approximation, making it suitable in a line search setting. However, the loss functions in DNNs are non-convex, where the Hessian is potentially non-positive definite. In this paper, we propose using a limited-memory symmetric rank-one quasi-Newton approach which allows for indefinite Hessian approximations, enabling directions of negative curvature to be exploited. Furthermore, we use a modified adaptive regularized cubics approach, which generates a sequence of cubic subproblems that have closed-form solutions with suitable regularization choices. We investigate the performance of our proposed method on autoencoders and feed-forward neural network models and compare our approach to state-of-the-art first-order adaptive stochastic methods as well as other quasi-Newton methods.x
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Navigating LLM Valley: From AdamW to Memory-Efficient and Matrix-Based Optimizers
This survey organizes LLM optimizer literature into categories and argues the field is shifting toward rigorous, multi-factor comparisons of convergence, memory, stability, and complexity.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.