Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Clinical QA 2.0: Multi-Task Learning for Answer Extraction and Categorization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.13108 v2 pith:QGH3CQH7 submitted 2025-02-18 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords medicalcategorizationanswermodelsclinicalstructuredansweringextraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Clinical Question Answering (CQA) plays a crucial role in medical decision-making, enabling physicians to extract relevant information from Electronic Medical Records (EMRs). While transformer-based models such as BERT, BioBERT, and ClinicalBERT have demonstrated state-of-the-art performance in CQA, existing models lack the ability to categorize extracted answers, which is critical for structured retrieval, content filtering, and medical decision support. To address this limitation, we introduce a Multi-Task Learning (MTL) framework that jointly trains CQA models for both answer extraction and medical categorization. In addition to predicting answer spans, our model classifies responses into five standardized medical categories: Diagnosis, Medication, Symptoms, Procedure, and Lab Reports. This categorization enables more structured and interpretable outputs, making clinical QA models more useful in real-world healthcare settings. We evaluate our approach on emrQA, a large-scale dataset for medical question answering. Results show that MTL improves F1-score by 2.2% compared to standard fine-tuning, while achieving 90.7% accuracy in answer categorization. These findings suggest that MTL not only enhances CQA performance but also introduces an effective mechanism for categorization and structured medical information retrieval.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hybrid AI for Responsive Multi-Turn Online Conversations with Novel Dynamic Routing and Feedback Adaptation

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A hybrid chatbot that routes easy queries to canned responses and complex queries to RAG reports 95% accuracy and 180ms latency on an internal support dataset.

  2. Hard Negative Mining for Domain-Specific Retrieval in Enterprise Systems

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A reranker fine-tuned on hard negatives selected by two cosine-distance criteria outperforms older negative sampling methods on enterprise and domain-specific retrieval benchmarks.

  3. SweEval: Do LLMs Really Swear? A Safety Benchmark for Testing Limits for Enterprise Use

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A new cross-lingual benchmark shows large language models comply with explicit requests to use swear words far more often in Indic languages than in English, revealing a safety alignment gap.

Pith tools