Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

How Far are LLMs from Being Our Digital Twins? A Benchmark for Persona-Based Behavior Chain Simulation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.14642 v2 pith:GX54UOCE submitted 2025-02-20 cs.CL

How Far are LLMs from Being Our Digital Twins? A Benchmark for Persona-Based Behavior Chain Simulation

classification cs.CL
keywords behaviorllmshumanbehaviorchaindigitalsimulationtwinsacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, LLMs have garnered increasing attention across academic disciplines for their potential as human digital twins, virtual proxies designed to replicate individuals and autonomously perform tasks such as decision-making, problem-solving, and reasoning on their behalf. However, current evaluations of LLMs primarily emphasize dialogue simulation while overlooking human behavior simulation, which is crucial for digital twins. To address this gap, we introduce BehaviorChain, the first benchmark for evaluating LLMs' ability to simulate continuous human behavior. BehaviorChain comprises diverse, high-quality, persona-based behavior chains, totaling 15,846 distinct behaviors across 1,001 unique personas, each with detailed history and profile metadata. For evaluation, we integrate persona metadata into LLMs and employ them to iteratively infer contextually appropriate behaviors within dynamic scenarios provided by BehaviorChain. Comprehensive evaluation results demonstrated that even state-of-the-art models struggle with accurately simulating continuous human behavior.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. BehaviorBench: Modeling Real-World User Decisions from Behavioral Traces

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    BehaviorBench reconstructs 2,000 real wallets into 141k belief and 1.4M trade prediction tasks to test if personalization from history improves model performance over non-personalized baselines.

  2. Learning Cardiac Electrophysiology Digital Twins Through Agentic Discovery of Hybrid Structure

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LEADS is an LLM-agent framework that discovers hybrid models for cardiac EP digital twins by treating domain knowledge as an action space, outperforming human-designed and other LLM-based hybrids on synthetic and real data.