REVIEW 8 cited by
SurveyX: Academic Survey Automation via Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
SurveyX: Academic Survey Automation via Large Language Models
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional comprehension capabilities and a vast knowledge base, suggesting that LLMs can serve as efficient tools for automated survey generation. However, recent research related to automated survey generation remains constrained by some critical limitations like finite context window, lack of in-depth content discussion, and absence of systematic evaluation frameworks. Inspired by human writing processes, we propose SurveyX, an efficient and organized system for automated survey generation that decomposes the survey composing process into two phases: the Preparation and Generation phases. By innovatively introducing online reference retrieval, a pre-processing method called AttributeTree, and a re-polishing process, SurveyX significantly enhances the efficacy of survey composition. Experimental evaluation results show that SurveyX outperforms existing automated survey generation systems in content quality (0.259 improvement) and citation quality (1.76 enhancement), approaching human expert performance across multiple evaluation dimensions. Examples of surveys generated by SurveyX are available on www.surveyx.cn
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
DeepSurvey: Enhancing Analytical Depth and Citation Reliability in Automated Survey Generation
DeepSurvey introduces an agentic system for automated survey generation that improves depth through full-text keynotes, cross-paper clustering, and code analysis, while boosting citation reliability via graph expansio...
-
SciCoQA: Quality Assurance for Scientific Paper--Code Alignment
SciCoQA benchmark reveals that even the strongest LLMs detect fewer than half of real discrepancies between scientific papers and their code.
-
AiraXiv: An AI-Driven Open-Access Platform for Human and AI Scientists
AiraXiv is a proposed AI-driven platform for open preprints that supports human and AI authors with interactive UI and MCP-based interactions, validated by serving as the submission system for ICAIS 2025.
-
SciAtlas: A Large-Scale Knowledge Graph for Automated Scientific Research
SciAtlas builds a large-scale multi-disciplinary academic knowledge graph and a neuro-symbolic retrieval system to support automated scientific research tasks such as literature review and idea positioning.
-
AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guide
AI can generate research artifacts faster than it can verify them, so across all eight lifecycle stages the credible deployment mode is human-governed collaboration rather than full autonomy.
-
AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guide
The paper delivers a stage-by-stage roadmap for AI in research, showing reliable assistance in retrieval and tool tasks but fragility in novelty and judgment, advocating human-governed collaboration.
-
Multi-Dimensional Knowledge Profiling with Large-Scale Literature Database and Hierarchical Retrieval
Large-scale profiling of recent AI literature shows growth in safety, multimodal reasoning, and agent studies alongside stabilization in neural machine translation and graph methods.
-
From LLM Reasoning to Autonomous AI Agents: A Comprehensive Review
A survey consolidating benchmarks, agent frameworks, real-world applications, and protocols for LLM-based autonomous agents into a proposed taxonomy with recommendations for future research.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.