Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Evolving Landscape of LLM- and VLM-Integrated Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.15214 v1 pith:BPYAUG3G submitted 2025-02-21 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords llmsvlmsapproachesdecision-makingimpressiveintegratinglanguagelearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) has shown impressive results in sequential decision-making tasks. Meanwhile, Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have emerged, exhibiting impressive capabilities in multimodal understanding and reasoning. These advances have led to a surge of research integrating LLMs and VLMs into RL. In this survey, we review representative works in which LLMs and VLMs are used to overcome key challenges in RL, such as lack of prior knowledge, long-horizon planning, and reward design. We present a taxonomy that categorizes these LLM/VLM-assisted RL approaches into three roles: agent, planner, and reward. We conclude by exploring open problems, including grounding, bias mitigation, improved representations, and action advice. By consolidating existing research and identifying future directions, this survey establishes a framework for integrating LLMs and VLMs into RL, advancing approaches that unify natural language and visual understanding with sequential decision-making.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When Adaptive Rewards Hurt: Causal Probing and the Switching-Stability Dilemma in LLM-Guided LEO Satellite Scheduling

    cs.AI 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Near-constant reward weights outperform carefully tuned dynamic weights in PPO LEO beam scheduling because weight switching restarts value-function convergence.

  2. HCRMP: A LLM-Hinted Contextual Reinforcement Learning Framework for Autonomous Driving

    cs.RO 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The HCRMP planner feeds LLM semantic hints into state representation and critic weighting instead of letting the LLM decide actions, reporting better CARLA driving metrics.

Pith tools