Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Understanding Fixed Predictions via Confined Regions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.16380 v2 pith:GX3FAMOL submitted 2025-02-22 cs.LG cs.AImath.OC

classification cs.LGcs.AImath.OC
keywords fixedpredictionsindividualsconfinedregionsexistinganticipatedata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning models can assign fixed predictions that preclude individuals from changing their outcome. Existing approaches to audit fixed predictions do so on a pointwise basis, which requires access to an existing dataset of individuals and may fail to anticipate fixed predictions in out-of-sample data. This work presents a new paradigm to identify fixed predictions by finding confined regions of the feature space in which all individuals receive fixed predictions. This paradigm enables the certification of recourse for out-of-sample data, works in settings without representative datasets, and provides interpretable descriptions of individuals with fixed predictions. We develop a fast method to discover confined regions for linear classifiers using mixed-integer quadratically constrained programming. We conduct a comprehensive empirical study of confined regions across diverse applications. Our results highlight that existing pointwise verification methods fail to anticipate future individuals with fixed predictions, while our method both identifies them and provides an interpretable description.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Statistical Inference for Responsiveness Verification

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A sampling-based procedure estimates and statistically tests how often a model's prediction changes under realistic user-specified interventions, with exact binomial guarantees.

Pith tools