Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Jacobian Sparse Autoencoders: Sparsify Computations, Not Just Activations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.18147 v2 pith:72DMSKXS submitted 2025-02-25 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords sparsitycomputationsllmssaesactivationscomputationaljsaesjacobian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have been successfully used to discover sparse and human-interpretable representations of the latent activations of LLMs. However, we would ultimately like to understand the computations performed by LLMs and not just their representations. The extent to which SAEs can help us understand computations is unclear because they are not designed to "sparsify" computations in any sense, only latent activations. To solve this, we propose Jacobian SAEs (JSAEs), which yield not only sparsity in the input and output activations of a given model component but also sparsity in the computation (formally, the Jacobian) connecting them. With a na\"ive implementation, the Jacobians in LLMs would be computationally intractable due to their size. One key technical contribution is thus finding an efficient way of computing Jacobians in this setup. We find that JSAEs extract a relatively large degree of computational sparsity while preserving downstream LLM performance approximately as well as traditional SAEs. We also show that Jacobians are a reasonable proxy for computational sparsity because MLPs are approximately linear when rewritten in the JSAE basis. Lastly, we show that JSAEs achieve a greater degree of computational sparsity on pre-trained LLMs than on the equivalent randomized LLM. This shows that the sparsity of the computational graph appears to be a property that LLMs learn through training, and suggests that JSAEs might be more suitable for understanding learned transformer computations than standard SAEs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Transformers Don't Need LayerNorm at Inference Time: Scaling LayerNorm Removal to GPT-2 XL and the Implications for Mechanistic Interpretability

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LayerNorm can be removed from all GPT-2 models by fine-tuning with a linear replacement, losing only a small amount of validation accuracy on filtered data.

  2. Interpretation Meets Safety: A Survey on Interpretation Methods and Tools for Improving LLM Safety

    cs.SE 2025-06 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new survey organizes LLM interpretation methods by workflow stage and connects them to safety enhancement strategies and tools, covering around 70 works.

  3. Hierarchical Sparse Circuit Extraction from Billion-Parameter Language Models through Scalable Attribution Graph Decomposition

    cs.LG 2026-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    HAGD claims to extract sparse circuits from billion-parameter LMs by hierarchical graph coarsening and GNN-guided search, but the O(n^2 log n) complexity guarantee rests on an unproven greedy-optimality assumption.

Pith tools