Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

SOK: Exploring Hallucinations and Security Risks in AI-Assisted Software Development with Insights for LLM Deployment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.18468 v1 pith:4PTWUYPN submitted 2025-01-31 cs.SE cs.AIcs.CR

classification cs.SEcs.AIcs.CR
keywords codecodingriskssecuritytoolsai-assistedassociatedbenefits
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, Cursor AI, and Codeium AI into software development has revolutionized the coding landscape, offering significant productivity gains, automation, and enhanced debugging capabilities. These tools have proven invaluable for generating code snippets, refactoring existing code, and providing real-time support to developers. However, their widespread adoption also presents notable challenges, particularly in terms of security vulnerabilities, code quality, and ethical concerns. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the benefits and risks associated with AI-powered coding tools, drawing on user feedback, security analyses, and practical use cases. We explore the potential for these tools to replicate insecure coding practices, introduce biases, and generate incorrect or non-sensical code (hallucinations). In addition, we discuss the risks of data leaks, intellectual property violations and the need for robust security measures to mitigate these threats. By comparing the features and performance of these tools, we aim to guide developers in making informed decisions about their use, ensuring that the benefits of AI-assisted coding are maximized while minimizing associated risks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Explicit Vulnerability Generation with LLMs: An Investigation Beyond Adversarial Attacks

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Open-source 7B LLMs frequently produce requested C vulnerabilities when explicitly prompted, but the reported rates exclude most model outputs and the claimed persona effects are inconsistent.

Pith tools