Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

MEDDxAgent: A Unified Modular Agent Framework for Explainable Automatic Differential Diagnosis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.19175 v2 pith:SCWD2CMG submitted 2025-02-26 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords diagnosismeddxagentdiagnosticmodularpatientagentapproachescomplete
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Differential Diagnosis (DDx) is a fundamental yet complex aspect of clinical decision-making, in which physicians iteratively refine a ranked list of possible diseases based on symptoms, antecedents, and medical knowledge. While recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in supporting DDx, existing approaches face key limitations, including single-dataset evaluations, isolated optimization of components, unrealistic assumptions about complete patient profiles, and single-attempt diagnosis. We introduce a Modular Explainable DDx Agent (MEDDxAgent) framework designed for interactive DDx, where diagnostic reasoning evolves through iterative learning, rather than assuming a complete patient profile is accessible. MEDDxAgent integrates three modular components: (1) an orchestrator (DDxDriver), (2) a history taking simulator, and (3) two specialized agents for knowledge retrieval and diagnosis strategy. To ensure robust evaluation, we introduce a comprehensive DDx benchmark covering respiratory, skin, and rare diseases. We analyze single-turn diagnostic approaches and demonstrate the importance of iterative refinement when patient profiles are not available at the outset. Our broad evaluation demonstrates that MEDDxAgent achieves over 10% accuracy improvements in interactive DDx across both large and small LLMs, while offering critical explainability into its diagnostic reasoning process.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LiteOdyssey: A Lightweight Reasoning AI Agent for Interpretable Rare-Disease Diagnosis

    cs.AI 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A clinician-audited diagnostic policy plus public tools lets a single unmodified LLM reach high phenotype-first rare-disease Recall@1 and modestly beat baselines on real UDN patients.

  2. "Where does it hurt?" -- Dataset and Study on Physician Intent Trajectories in Doctor Patient Dialogues

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new SOAP-based physician intent taxonomy and labeled dialogue dataset, with benchmarks showing models classify intents accurately but fail to predict SOAP-category transitions.

  3. MultiDx: A Multi-Source Knowledge Integration Framework towards Diagnostic Reasoning

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    MultiDx integrates evidence from web search, SOAP cases, and clinical databases in a two-stage process to improve LLM diagnostic reasoning and alignment with clinical trajectories.

  4. Infherno: End-to-end Agent-based FHIR Resource Synthesis from Free-form Clinical Notes

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Infherno deploys LLM agents with code execution and terminology tools to synthesize FHIR resources from unstructured clinical notes, matching human baseline performance on synthetic and real datasets.

  5. From LLM Reasoning to Autonomous AI Agents: A Comprehensive Review

    cs.AI 2025-04 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey consolidating benchmarks, agent frameworks, real-world applications, and protocols for LLM-based autonomous agents into a proposed taxonomy with recommendations for future research.

Pith tools