Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Framing the Game: How Context Shapes LLM Decision-Making

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.04840 v1 pith:XCDBV57C submitted 2025-03-05 cs.CL cs.AIcs.GT

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.GT
keywords decision-makingacrossevaluationframingcontextcontextsgamehighly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed across diverse contexts to support decision-making. While existing evaluations effectively probe latent model capabilities, they often overlook the impact of context framing on perceived rational decision-making. In this study, we introduce a novel evaluation framework that systematically varies evaluation instances across key features and procedurally generates vignettes to create highly varied scenarios. By analyzing decision-making patterns across different contexts with the same underlying game structure, we uncover significant contextual variability in LLM responses. Our findings demonstrate that this variability is largely predictable yet highly sensitive to framing effects. Our results underscore the need for dynamic, context-aware evaluation methodologies for real-world deployments.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Humans Are More Diverse: Frontier LLMs Show Extreme Policies in Idealised AI Development Races

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Frontier LLMs playing an abstract AI-race game show extreme, model-specific policies, while human players are more diverse, so aggregate Unsafe rates alone are misleading.

Pith tools