Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Towards Conversational AI for Disease Management

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.06074 v1 pith:7AKS4RLD submitted 2025-03-08 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords amiemanagementreasoningclinicaldiseasepcpscapabilitiesdrug
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

While large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in diagnostic dialogue, their capabilities for effective management reasoning - including disease progression, therapeutic response, and safe medication prescription - remain under-explored. We advance the previously demonstrated diagnostic capabilities of the Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer (AMIE) through a new LLM-based agentic system optimised for clinical management and dialogue, incorporating reasoning over the evolution of disease and multiple patient visit encounters, response to therapy, and professional competence in medication prescription. To ground its reasoning in authoritative clinical knowledge, AMIE leverages Gemini's long-context capabilities, combining in-context retrieval with structured reasoning to align its output with relevant and up-to-date clinical practice guidelines and drug formularies. In a randomized, blinded virtual Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) study, AMIE was compared to 21 primary care physicians (PCPs) across 100 multi-visit case scenarios designed to reflect UK NICE Guidance and BMJ Best Practice guidelines. AMIE was non-inferior to PCPs in management reasoning as assessed by specialist physicians and scored better in both preciseness of treatments and investigations, and in its alignment with and grounding of management plans in clinical guidelines. To benchmark medication reasoning, we developed RxQA, a multiple-choice question benchmark derived from two national drug formularies (US, UK) and validated by board-certified pharmacists. While AMIE and PCPs both benefited from the ability to access external drug information, AMIE outperformed PCPs on higher difficulty questions. While further research would be needed before real-world translation, AMIE's strong performance across evaluations marks a significant step towards conversational AI as a tool in disease management.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PATHFinder Agent for Tailored Prenatal Care

    cs.AI 2026-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    PATHFinder Agent drafts tailored prenatal care plans from patient dialogue and Michigan 211 resource lookups; GPT-5.2 scored 77.6% on expert rubrics, but no human validation is reported.

  2. MATRIX: Multi-Agent simulaTion fRamework for safe Interactions and conteXtual clinical conversational evaluation

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MATRIX combines a structured safety taxonomy, an LLM hazard judge, and a patient simulator to benchmark clinical dialogue agents, claiming expert-level hazard detection and revealing weak emergency handling in current LLMs.

Pith tools