Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

AuthorMist: Evading AI Text Detectors with Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.08716 v1 pith:DN5LWFLQ submitted 2025-03-10 cs.CR cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.LG
keywords textdetectorsauthormistai-generatedreinforcementdetectiondetectorevading
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the age of powerful AI-generated text, automatic detectors have emerged to identify machine-written content. This poses a threat to author privacy and freedom, as text authored with AI assistance may be unfairly flagged. We propose AuthorMist, a novel reinforcement learning-based system to transform AI-generated text into human-like writing. AuthorMist leverages a 3-billion-parameter language model as a backbone, fine-tuned with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GPRO) to paraphrase text in a way that evades AI detectors. Our framework establishes a generic approach where external detector APIs (GPTZero, WinstonAI, Originality.ai, etc.) serve as reward functions within the reinforcement learning loop, enabling the model to systematically learn outputs that these detectors are less likely to classify as AI-generated. This API-as-reward methodology can be applied broadly to optimize text against any detector with an accessible interface. Experiments on multiple datasets and detectors demonstrate that AuthorMist effectively reduces the detectability of AI-generated text while preserving the original meaning. Our evaluation shows attack success rates ranging from 78.6% to 96.2% against individual detectors, significantly outperforming baseline paraphrasing methods. AuthorMist maintains high semantic similarity (above 0.94) with the original text while successfully evading detection. These results highlight limitations in current AI text detection technologies and raise questions about the sustainability of the detection-evasion arms race.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Character-Level Perturbations Disrupt LLM Watermarks

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Character-level perturbations split tokens and disrupt multiple watermark entries at once, enabling low-budget watermark removal, enhanced by a genetic algorithm guided by a trained reference detector.

  2. Unveiling Unicode's Unseen Underpinnings in Undermining Authorship Attribution

    cs.CR 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper proposes integrating Unicode steganography into adversarial stylometry to undermine authorship attribution.

Pith tools