Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

RECSIP: REpeated Clustering of Scores Improving the Precision

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.12108 v1 pith:RTHG62JY submitted 2025-03-15 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords modelsclusteringimprovingllmsprecisionrecsipreliabilitylanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The latest research on Large Language Models (LLMs) has demonstrated significant advancement in the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP). However, despite this progress, there is still a lack of reliability in these models. This is due to the stochastic architecture of LLMs, which presents a challenge for users attempting to ascertain the reliability of a model's response. These responses may cause serious harm in high-risk environments or expensive failures in industrial contexts. Therefore, we introduce the framework REpeated Clustering of Scores Improving the Precision (RECSIP) which focuses on improving the precision of LLMs by asking multiple models in parallel, scoring and clustering their responses to ensure a higher reliability on the response. The evaluation of our reference implementation recsip on the benchmark MMLU-Pro using the models GPT-4o, Claude and Gemini shows an overall increase of 5.8 per cent points compared to the best used model.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. GenAI for Automotive Software Development: From Requirements to Wheels

    cs.SE 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    An architecture proposal for using GenAI in automotive development, without empirical validation.

  2. Survey of GenAI for Automotive Software Development: From Requirements to Executable Code

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A review of roughly 60 papers and 9 industry respondents finds GPT-family models dominate automotive code generation while requirements handling lags due to confidentiality constraints.

Pith tools