REVIEW 4 cited by
Generative AI for Software Architecture. Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Context: Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is transforming much of software development, yet its application in software architecture is still in its infancy, and no prior study has systematically addressed the topic. Aim: We aim to systematically synthesize the use, rationale, contexts, usability, and future challenges of GenAI in software architecture. Method: We performed a multivocal literature review (MLR), analyzing peer-reviewed and gray literature, identifying current practices, models, adoption contexts, and reported challenges, extracting themes via open coding. Results: Our review identified significant adoption of GenAI for architectural decision support and architectural reconstruction. OpenAI GPT models are predominantly applied, and there is consistent use of techniques such as few-shot prompting and retrieved-augmented generation (RAG). GenAI has been applied mostly to initial stages of the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC), such as Requirements-to-Architecture and Architecture-to-Code. Monolithic and microservice architectures were the dominant targets. However, rigorous testing of GenAI outputs was typically missing from the studies. Among the most frequent challenges are model precision, hallucinations, ethical aspects, privacy issues, lack of architecture-specific datasets, and the absence of sound evaluation frameworks. Conclusions: GenAI shows significant potential in software design, but several challenges remain on its path to greater adoption. Research efforts should target designing general evaluation methodologies, handling ethics and precision, increasing transparency and explainability, and promoting architecture-specific datasets and benchmarks to bridge the gap between theoretical possibilities and practical use.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
What Were You Thinking? An LLM-Driven Large-Scale Study of Refactoring Motivations in Open-Source Projects
LLM-generated refactoring motivations agree with expert raters about 80% of the time, align with literature motivations in roughly half of cases, and correlate only weakly with software metrics.
-
Emerging Trends in Software Architecture from the Practitioners Perspective: A Five Year Review
A five-year analysis of practitioner conference talks shows a few cloud-native technologies, led by Kubernetes, dominate industry discourse, while planning and coding phases receive far less attention than deployment ...
-
MAAD: Automate Software Architecture Design through Knowledge-Driven Multi-Agent Collaboration
A multi-agent LLM framework generates software architecture designs and evaluation reports from requirements, claimed to outperform MetaGPT on architectural completeness.
-
Autonomic Microservice Management via Agentic AI and MAPE-K Integration
A conceptual framework integrating MAPE-K with agentic AI for autonomous microservice anomaly management, including a proposed autonomic threshold for human oversight, offered without empirical validation.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.