Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Lie Detector: Unified Backdoor Detection via Cross-Examination Framework

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.16872 v2 pith:BCEAK5US submitted 2025-03-21 cs.LG cs.CV

Lie Detector: Unified Backdoor Detection via Cross-Examination Framework

classification cs.LG cs.CV
keywords learningbackdoordetectionmodelacrosstrainingaccuracybackdoors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Institutions with limited data and computing resources often outsource model training to third-party providers in a semi-honest setting, assuming adherence to prescribed training protocols with pre-defined learning paradigm (e.g., supervised or semi-supervised learning). However, this practice can introduce severe security risks, as adversaries may poison the training data to embed backdoors into the resulting model. Existing detection approaches predominantly rely on statistical analyses, which often fail to maintain universally accurate detection accuracy across different learning paradigms. To address this challenge, we propose a unified backdoor detection framework in the semi-honest setting that exploits cross-examination of model inconsistencies between two independent service providers. Specifically, we integrate central kernel alignment to enable robust feature similarity measurements across different model architectures and learning paradigms, thereby facilitating precise recovery and identification of backdoor triggers. We further introduce backdoor fine-tuning sensitivity analysis to distinguish backdoor triggers from adversarial perturbations, substantially reducing false positives. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves superior detection performance, improving accuracy by 5.4%, 1.6%, and 11.9% over SoTA baselines across supervised, semi-supervised, and autoregressive learning tasks, respectively. Notably, it is the first to effectively detect backdoors in multimodal large language models, further highlighting its broad applicability and advancing secure deep learning.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. TimeGuard: Channel-wise Pool Training for Backdoor Defense in Time Series Forecasting

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    TimeGuard defends time series forecasting against backdoors via channel-wise pool training initialized by time-aware criteria and expanded with distance-regularized loss selection, improving poisoned MAE by 1.96x whil...

  2. TimeGuard: Channel-wise Pool Training for Backdoor Defense in Time Series Forecasting

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    TimeGuard employs channel-wise pool training initialized with time-aware criteria and distance-regularized loss selection to defend time series forecasting against backdoor attacks, improving robustness by 1.96x while...

  3. A Patch-based Cross-view Regularized Framework for Backdoor Defense in Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A patch-augmented cross-view regularization method reduces backdoor attack success rates in multimodal LLMs by enforcing output differences between original and perturbed views while using entropy constraints to prese...