Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Generating Synthetic Data with Formal Privacy Guarantees: State of the Art and the Road Ahead

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.20846 v1 pith:5VRW2U2K submitted 2025-03-26 cs.CR cs.CLcs.CV

classification cs.CRcs.CLcs.CV
keywords dataprivacybenchmarksdomainsguaranteesempiricalformalrealistic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Privacy-preserving synthetic data offers a promising solution to harness segregated data in high-stakes domains where information is compartmentalized for regulatory, privacy, or institutional reasons. This survey provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the landscape of privacy-preserving synthetic data, presenting the theoretical foundations of generative models and differential privacy followed by a review of state-of-the-art methods across tabular data, images, and text. Our synthesis of evaluation approaches highlights the fundamental trade-off between utility for down-stream tasks and privacy guarantees, while identifying critical research gaps: the lack of realistic benchmarks representing specialized domains and insufficient empirical evaluations required to contextualise formal guarantees. Through empirical analysis of four leading methods on five real-world datasets from specialized domains, we demonstrate significant performance degradation under realistic privacy constraints ($\epsilon \leq 4$), revealing a substantial gap between results reported on general domain benchmarks and performance on domain-specific data. %Our findings highlight key challenges including unaccounted privacy leakage, insufficient empirical verification of formal guarantees, and a critical deficit of realistic benchmarks. These challenges underscore the need for robust evaluation frameworks, standardized benchmarks for specialized domains, and improved techniques to address the unique requirements of privacy-sensitive fields such that this technology can deliver on its considerable potential.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating Differentially Private Generation of Domain-Specific Text

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Applying a new benchmark to five specialized domains, the paper shows current privacy-preserving text generators lose much of their utility and fidelity, especially at strict privacy levels and on gated datasets.

Pith tools