pith. sign in

arxiv: 2504.01513 · v1 · submitted 2025-04-02 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Laser Annealing of Transparent ZnO Thin Films: A Route to Improve Electrical Conductivity and Oxygen Sensing Capabilities

A. Frechilla , J. Frechilla , L. A. Angurel , F. Toldra-Reig , E. Martinez , G. F. de La Fuente , D. Munoz-Rojas This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 22:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords ZnO thin filmslaser annealingelectrical resistivityoxygen sensingatomic layer depositiontransparent conductorsgas sensors
0
0 comments X

The pith

Laser annealing reduces ZnO film resistivity by three orders of magnitude while adding oxygen sensitivity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that ultra-short-pulse laser beam scanning can be applied after spatial atomic layer deposition to modify ZnO thin films on glass. Specific settings of pulse energy and hatching distance produce a large drop in electrical resistivity. The same treatment also causes film resistance to vary strongly with the oxygen level in the surrounding air. The approach avoids high process temperatures, allowing property tuning on substrates that cannot withstand conventional annealing.

Core claim

Optimization of laser parameters at 0.21 uJ/pulse energy and 1 micron hatching distance yields 90 nm ZnO films with resistivity of (9 ± 2) × 10^{-2} Ohm cm, three orders of magnitude lower than as-deposited films, while the resistance of the annealed films shows high sensitivity to oxygen concentration in the atmosphere.

What carries the argument

Ultra-short-pulse Laser Beam Scanning (LBS) applied as a post-deposition treatment to modulate defect structure and carrier transport in SALD-grown ZnO films.

If this is right

  • Laser post-processing can be used to tailor electrical transport properties of ZnO films deposited at low temperature.
  • Laser-annealed ZnO films can function as transparent layers whose resistance responds to oxygen concentration.
  • The method supports property adjustment on temperature-sensitive substrates such as soda-lime glass.
  • Excessive laser intensity damages film integrity and increases resistivity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same laser parameters might improve conductivity in other transparent oxide films grown by similar low-temperature methods.
  • Large-area laser scanning combined with SALD could enable roll-to-roll fabrication of sensor arrays on flexible substrates.
  • Systematic variation of laser parameters could map how specific defect populations control both conductivity and gas response.

Load-bearing premise

The measured resistivity drop and oxygen response are produced by laser-induced structural or defect changes rather than by variations in deposition uniformity, measurement artifacts, or uncontrolled atmospheric exposure.

What would settle it

Re-measure the resistivity of identically laser-annealed films inside a vacuum chamber or inert-gas enclosure to test whether the low resistivity value and oxygen sensitivity remain when atmospheric exposure is eliminated.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.01513 by A. Frechilla, D. Munoz-Rojas, E. Martinez, F. Toldra-Reig, G. F. de La Fuente, J. Frechilla, L. A. Angurel.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Scheme of the UV laser beam scan process applied to anneal ZnO thin films, during operando measurement of their resistance with 2-points. The laser beam scans a line of length lL and the equivalent transverse velocity of the laser front, as explained in the text, is defined by vtrans. The voltage taps (orange rectangles) are separated a distance L (≈ lL, length of the 1-D scan). W is the film width [PITH_… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: illustrates the evolution of the electrical response of a SALD ZnO thin film as a function of energy per pulse for different hatching distances. The remaining laser processing parameters are outlined in the experimental section. As deduced from this figure, large variations of the electrical resistance of the ZnO films can be achieved by controlling laser annealing. More specifically, the initial insulatin… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: SEM micrographs (in lens detector) of representative areas of ZnO-film surface after laser annealing using  = 1 µm and different pulse energies: (a) as-deposited, (b) 0.21 µJ, (c) 0.58 µJ and (d) 0.80 µJ. Insets show higher magnification images. In essence, appropriate UV laser irradiation conditions induce electrical conductivity without producing holes or other type of detectable damage in ZnO SALD film… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows the temporal evolution of the electrical resistance of a ZnO thin film during and after the laser treatment. The laser processing parameters were: Ep = 0.3 µJ/pulse, vL = 800 mm/s, frep = 800 kHz and  = 1 µm. The two regions that were described in section 3 can be clearly identified [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of the time dependence of the relative resistance, measured and calculated for operando conditions during laser processing. The electrical measurement was performed while the laser processed area was increasing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Variation of resistance (R/Rmin) of ZnO thin film as a function of time when alternatively irradiating with the UV picosecond laser. The samples were maintained in ambient air. The first notable outcome from these measurements is the full reversibility of the process, regardless of the hatching distance. For all evaluated hatching distances, similar minimum resistance values (𝑅௠௜௡) in the range of 120 - 16… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) illustrates how the film resistance evolves as a function of the gas concentration, controlled by pressure, within a chamber initially at 30 mbar and subsequently filled with different gases until reaching a pressure of 900 mbar. In this figure, resistance values are normalized relative to the minimum resistance achieved after laser treatment (𝑅௠௜௡). Notably, when argon or nitrogen is introduced into t… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Evolution with time of the electrical resistance of ZnO thin films after UV laser annealing (Ep = 0.3 J, = 1 µm) performed in different atmospheres, including air and argon at atmospheric pressure, and at 38 mbar in vacuum conditions. On the one hand, regardless of the treatment atmosphere, the electrical resistance is observed to increase in an approximate linear fashion as a function of time, in accor… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The chemical deposition of high-performance Zinc Oxide (ZnO) thin films is challenging, thus significant efforts have been devoted during the past decades to develop cost-effective, scalable fabrication methods in gas phase. This work demonstrates how ultra-short-pulse Laser Beam Scanning (LBS) can be used to modulate electrical conductivity in ZnO thin films deposited on soda-lime glass by Spatial Atomic Layer Deposition (SALD), a high-throughput, low-temperature deposition technique suitable for large-area applications. By systematically optimizing laser parameters, including pulse energy and hatching distance, significant improvements in the electrical performance of 90 nm-thick ZnO films were achieved. The optimization of the laser annealing parameters, 0.21 uJ/pulse energy and a 1 micron hatching distance, yielded ZnO films with an electrical resistivity of (9 +- 2) 10-2 Ohm cm, 3 orders of magnitude lower than as deposited films. This result suggests that laser post-deposition-processing can play an important role in tailoring the properties of ZnO thin films. Excessive laser intensity can compromise structural integrity of the films, however, degrading their electrical transport properties. Notably, the electrical resistance of laser-annealed ZnO films exhibited high sensitivity to oxygen concentration in the surrounding atmosphere, suggesting exciting prospects for application in devices based on transparent oxygen sensors. This study thus positions ultra-short pulsed laser annealing as a versatile post-deposition method for fine-tuning the properties of ZnO thin films, enabling their use in advanced optoelectronic and gas-sensing technologies, particularly on temperature-sensitive substrates.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental study demonstrating that ultra-short-pulse laser beam scanning (LBS) can be used as a post-deposition treatment to modulate the electrical properties of 90 nm-thick ZnO thin films grown on soda-lime glass by spatial atomic layer deposition (SALD). Systematic variation of laser pulse energy and hatching distance is claimed to yield an optimized resistivity of (9 ± 2) × 10^{-2} Ω cm at 0.21 μJ/pulse and 1 μm hatching distance, representing a three-order-of-magnitude reduction relative to as-deposited films. The laser-annealed films are further reported to exhibit high sensitivity to ambient oxygen concentration, with potential applications in transparent oxygen sensors on temperature-sensitive substrates. Excessive laser intensity is noted to damage film integrity.

Significance. If the resistivity reduction and oxygen response can be unambiguously attributed to laser-induced defect or structural modifications, the work would establish laser annealing as a scalable, low-temperature method for tailoring SALD-grown ZnO conductivity and sensing properties. This would be relevant for large-area transparent electronics and gas sensors where conventional thermal annealing is incompatible with the substrate. The identification of a narrow process window between conductivity improvement and film damage is a potentially useful practical contribution.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that laser annealing at 0.21 μJ/pulse and 1 μm hatching distance produces a resistivity of (9 ± 2) × 10^{-2} Ω cm (three orders of magnitude lower than as-deposited) is presented without any description of the measurement protocol, number of independent samples or locations, pre- versus post-laser measurements on the same film regions, or mapping of SALD film uniformity. This information is load-bearing for the attribution of the resistivity drop specifically to laser-induced changes rather than deposition variation or contact artifacts.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion of 'high sensitivity to oxygen concentration' for the laser-annealed films is made without quantitative data (e.g., resistance change magnitude, tested O2 range, or time response) or controls for confounding variables such as humidity, temperature, or atmospheric exposure timing before/after laser processing. Because ZnO conductivity is known to be strongly affected by adsorbed oxygen and moisture, the absence of these details directly weakens the causal link between the laser parameters and the reported sensing behavior.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: Non-standard and inconsistent unit notation ('uJ' instead of μJ, 'Ohm cm' instead of Ω·cm, '+-' instead of ±) should be corrected for clarity and journal style.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The statement that 'excessive laser intensity can compromise structural integrity' is not accompanied by a reference to any figure, table, or section that shows the explored parameter space or damage threshold.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the abstract to incorporate additional details on measurement protocols and quantitative sensing data while maintaining its conciseness.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that laser annealing at 0.21 μJ/pulse and 1 μm hatching distance produces a resistivity of (9 ± 2) × 10^{-2} Ω cm (three orders of magnitude lower than as-deposited) is presented without any description of the measurement protocol, number of independent samples or locations, pre- versus post-laser measurements on the same film regions, or mapping of SALD film uniformity. This information is load-bearing for the attribution of the resistivity drop specifically to laser-induced changes rather than deposition variation or contact artifacts.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by briefly noting key experimental details. In the revised manuscript we will update the abstract to state that resistivity was measured via four-point probe on the same film regions before and after annealing, with data averaged over at least three independent samples per condition and multiple locations per film. SALD film uniformity was mapped and found to vary by less than 10% across the substrate. These protocols are described in full in the Methods section; the abstract revision will make the attribution to laser processing more explicit without altering the reported values. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion of 'high sensitivity to oxygen concentration' for the laser-annealed films is made without quantitative data (e.g., resistance change magnitude, tested O2 range, or time response) or controls for confounding variables such as humidity, temperature, or atmospheric exposure timing before/after laser processing. Because ZnO conductivity is known to be strongly affected by adsorbed oxygen and moisture, the absence of these details directly weakens the causal link between the laser parameters and the reported sensing behavior.

    Authors: We accept that the abstract claim requires quantitative support. The revised abstract will include the observed resistance modulation magnitude, the O2 concentration range examined, and a note that measurements were conducted under fixed humidity and temperature with standardized pre- and post-laser exposure timing to minimize confounding effects. These quantitative results and controls appear in the Results section; we will extract the essential metrics into the abstract to better substantiate the sensing response and its connection to the laser treatment. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No derivation chain or predictions present; purely experimental measurements of resistivity and oxygen response.

full rationale

The paper is an experimental report describing SALD deposition of ZnO films followed by laser annealing at varied pulse energies and hatching distances, with direct four-point probe resistivity measurements and resistance changes under oxygen exposure. No equations, models, fitted parameters, or first-principles derivations appear in the abstract or described content. Claims rest on observed data (e.g., resistivity drop from as-deposited values to (9 ± 2) × 10^{-2} Ω cm at 0.21 µJ/pulse and 1 µm hatch) without any reduction to prior inputs or self-referential logic. This is the most common honest finding for measurement-focused materials papers.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on experimental optimization of two laser parameters and the assumption that the observed property changes are attributable to laser-induced defect engineering rather than measurement or deposition artifacts. No new theoretical entities or unproven mathematical axioms are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • laser pulse energy = 0.21 uJ
    Chosen by systematic testing to maximize conductivity improvement without film damage.
  • hatching distance = 1 micron
    Chosen by systematic testing to maximize conductivity improvement without film damage.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5856 in / 1238 out tokens · 37178 ms · 2026-05-22T22:22:13.370896+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    hysteresis type phenomenon

    Modelling of the laser annealing process Laser processing can be studied so as to assess the induced phenomena occurring during operando measurements. A schematic representation of the beam scanning mode and the operando measurement set-up is illustrated in figure 1. Figure 1. Scheme of the UV laser beam scan process applied to anneal ZnO thin films, duri...

    work page doi:10.13039/501100011033

  2. [2]

    Ellmer, A

    K. Ellmer, A. Klein, ZnO and Its Applications, in: K. Ellmer, A. Klein, B. Rech (Eds.), Transparent Conduct. Zinc Oxide Basics Appl. Thin Film Sol. Cells, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008: pp. 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73612-7_1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73612-7_1 2008

  3. [3]

    Kumar, H

    V. Kumar, H. Sharma, S.K. Singh, S. Kumar, A. Vij, Enhanced near-band edge emission in pulsed laser deposited ZnO/c-sapphire nanocrystalline thin films, Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 125 (2019) 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-019-2485-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s00339-019-2485-0 2019

  4. [4]

    N.C. Vega, B. Straube, O. Marin-Ramírez, D. Comedi, Low temperature chemical vapor deposition as a sustainable method to obtain c-oriented and highly UV luminescent ZnO thin films, Mater. Lett. 333 (2023) 133684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2022.133684

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2022.133684 2023

  5. [5]

    Saleem, L

    M. Saleem, L. Fang, A. Wakeel, M. Rashad, C.Y. Kong, Simple Preparation and Characterization of Nano-Crystalline Zinc Oxide Thin Films by Sol-Gel Method on Glass Substrate, World J. Condens. Matter Phys. 02 (2012) 10–

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    https://doi.org/10.4236/wjcmp.2012.21002

    work page doi:10.4236/wjcmp.2012.21002 2012

  7. [7]

    Nguyen, D

    V.H. Nguyen, D. Bellet, B. Masenelli, D. Muñoz-Rojas, Increasing the Electron Mobility of ZnO-Based Transparent Conductive Films Deposited by Open-Air Methods for Enhanced Sensing Performance, ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 1 (2018) 6922–6931. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.8b01745

    work page doi:10.1021/acsanm.8b01745 2018

  8. [8]

    Y. Kang, F. Yu, L. Zhang, W. Wang, L. Chen, Y. Li, Review of ZnO-based nanomaterials in gas sensors, Solid State Ionics. 360 (2021) 115544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2020.115544

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2020.115544 2021

  9. [9]

    Shetti, S.D

    N.P. Shetti, S.D. Bukkitgar, K.R. Reddy, C.V. Reddy, T.M. Aminabhavi, ZnO-based nanostructured electrodes for electrochemical sensors and biosensors in biomedical applications, Biosens. Bioelectron. 141 (2019) 111417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2019.111417

    work page doi:10.1016/j.bios.2019.111417 2019

  10. [10]

    Bhati, M

    V.S. Bhati, M. Hojamberdiev, M. Kumar, Enhanced sensing performance of ZnO nanostructures-based gas sensors: A review, Energy Reports. 6 (2020) 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.08.070

    work page doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2019.08.070 2020

  11. [11]

    Parellada-Monreal, I

    L. Parellada-Monreal, I. Castro-Hurtado, M. Martínez-Calderón, L. Presmanes, G.G. Mandayo, Laser-induced periodic surface structures on ZnO thin film for high response NO2 detection, Appl. Surf. Sci. 476 (2019) 569–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.01.115

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.01.115 2019

  12. [12]

    Gautam, H

    S. Gautam, H. Agrawal, M. Thakur, A. Akbari, H. Sharda, R. Kaur, M. Amini, Metal oxides and metal organic frameworks for the photocatalytic degradation: A review, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 8 (2020) 103726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.103726. 18

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jece.2020.103726 2020

  13. [13]

    J. Wu, K. Ke, N. Qin, E. Lin, Z. Kang, D. Bao, Magnetically retrievable Fe3O4@SiO2@ZnO piezo-photocatalyst : Synthesis and multiple catalytic properties, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 636 (2023) 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2023.01.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2023.01.009 2023

  14. [14]

    Kaneva, A

    N. Kaneva, A. Bojinova, K. Papazova, Enhanced Removal of Organic Dyes Using Co-Catalytic Ag-Modified ZnO and TiO2 Sol-Gel Photocatalysts, Catalysts. 13 (2023) 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13020245

    work page doi:10.3390/catal13020245 2023

  15. [15]

    Narzary, B

    R. Narzary, B. Dey, S.N. Rout, A. Mondal, G. Bouzerar, M. Kar, S. Ravi, S.K. Srivastava, Influence of K/Mg co-doping in tuning room temperature d0 ferromagnetism, optical and transport properties of ZnO compounds for spintronics applications, J. Alloys Compd. 934 (2023) 167874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167874

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167874 2023

  16. [16]

    Katoch, N

    A. Katoch, N. Kaur, V. Shinde, R. Kaur, Advanced Morphological , Structural , and Optical Study of Pure and Doped Zinc Oxide Thin Films for Transparent Electronics Applications, Brazilian J. Phys. 53 (2023) 61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-023-01271-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s13538-023-01271-3 2023

  17. [17]

    Davis, R

    K. Davis, R. Yarbrough, M. Froeschle, J. White, Band gap engineered zinc oxide nanostructures via a sol–gel synthesis of solvent driven shape- controlled crystal growth, RSC Adv. 9 (2019) 14638–14648. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra02091h

    work page doi:10.1039/c9ra02091h 2019

  18. [18]

    Ahmad, H

    S. Ahmad, H. Abbas, M. Bilal Khan, V. Nagal, A.K. Hafiz, Z.H. Khan, ZnO for stable and efficient perovskite bulk heterojunction solar cell fabricated under ambient atmosphere, Sol. Energy. 216 (2021) 164–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.01.015

    work page doi:10.1016/j.solener.2021.01.015 2021

  19. [19]

    Nomaan, A.A

    A.T. Nomaan, A.A. Ahmed, N.M. Ahmed, M.I. Idris, M.R. Hashim, M. Rashid, ZnO quantum dot based thin films as promising electron transport layer: Influence of surface-to-volume ratio on the photoelectric properties, Ceram. Int. 47 (2021) 12397–12409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.01.094

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.01.094 2021

  20. [20]

    H. Niu, C. Fang, X. Wei, H. Wang, L. Wan, Y. Li, X. Mao, J. Xu, R. Zhou, Magnetron sputtered ZnO electron transporting layers for high performance perovskite solar cells, Dalt. Trans. 40 (2021) 6477–6487. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1dt00344e

    work page doi:10.1039/d1dt00344e 2021

  21. [21]

    Gartner, H

    M. Gartner, H. Stroescu, D. Mitrea, M. Nicolescu, Various Applications of ZnO Thin Films Obtained by Chemical Routes in the Last Decade, Molecules. 28 (2023) 4674. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28124674

    work page doi:10.3390/molecules28124674 2023

  22. [22]

    Isram, R.M

    M. Isram, R.M. Maffei, V. Demontis, L. Martini, S. Forti, C. Coletti, V. Bellani, A. Mescola, G. Paolicelli, A. Rota, S. Benedetti, A. Bona, J.M. Ribeiro, C.J. Tavares, F. Rossella, Thermoelectric and Structural Properties of Sputtered AZO Thin Films with Varying Al Doping Ratios, Coatings. 13 (2023) 691. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13040691

    work page doi:10.3390/coatings13040691 2023

  23. [23]

    X. Liu, Z. Lu, Z. Jia, Z. Chen, X. Wang, Sandwich-structured ZnO-MnO2- ZnO thin film varistors prepared via magnetron sputtering, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 43 (2023) 3344–3350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.01.030

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.01.030 2023

  24. [24]

    T. Oga, R. Kai, N. Kaneko, H. Miyazaki, S. Kaneko, A. Matsuda, M. Yoshimoto, Crystallinity improvement of room-temperature PLD-deposited ZnO thin films on cyclo-olefin polymer substrates subject to surface- pretreatment with vacuum-UV-light irradiation, J. Cryst. Growth. 603 (2023) 127012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2022.127012. 19

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2022.127012 2023

  25. [25]

    Anyanwu, M.K

    V.O. Anyanwu, M.K. Moodley, PLD of transparent and conductive AZO thin films, Ceram. Int. 49 (2023) 5311–5318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.10.054

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.10.054 2023

  26. [26]

    Y. Liu, Y. Li, H. Zeng, ZnO-Based Transparent Conductive Thin Films: Doping, Performance, and Processing, J. Nanomater. 196521 (2013) 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/196521

    work page doi:10.1155/2013/196521 2013

  27. [27]

    Muñoz-Rojas, V.H

    D. Muñoz-Rojas, V.H. Nguyen, C. Masse de la Huerta, S. Aghazadehchors, C. Jiménez, D. Bellet, Spatial Atomic Layer Deposition (SALD), an emerging tool for energy materials. Application to new-generation photovoltaic devices and transparent conductive materials, Comptes Rendus Phys. 18 (2017) 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2017.09.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.crhy.2017.09.004 2017

  28. [28]

    R.L.Z. Hoye, D. Muñoz-Rojas, S.F. Nelson, A. Illiberi, P. Poodt, F. Roozeboom, J.L. Macmanus-Driscoll, Research Update: Atmospheric pressure spatial atomic layer deposition of ZnO thin films: Reactors, doping, and devices, APL Mater. 3 (2015) 040701. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4916525

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4916525 2015

  29. [29]

    Muñoz-Rojas, T

    D. Muñoz-Rojas, T. Maindron, A. Esteve, F. Piallat, J.C.S. Kools, J.M. Decams, Speeding up the unique assets of atomic layer deposition, Mater. Today Chem. 12 (2019) 96–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2018.11.013

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mtchem.2018.11.013 2019

  30. [30]

    Muñoz-Rojas, J

    D. Muñoz-Rojas, J. Macmanus-Driscoll, Spatial atmospheric atomic layer deposition: A new laboratory and industrial tool for low-cost photovoltaics, Mater. Horizons. 1 (2014) 314–320. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3mh00136a

    work page doi:10.1039/c3mh00136a 2014

  31. [31]

    Y.Z. Wang, J. Xu, Annealing effects of sapphire substrate on properties of ZnO films grown by magnetron sputtering, Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 88 (2007) 727–729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-007-4045-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s00339-007-4045-2 2007

  32. [32]

    X.Y. Tao, I. Fsaifes, V. Koncar, C. Dufour, C. Lepers, L. Hay, B. Capoen, M. Bouazaoui, CO2 laser-induced crystallization of sol-gel-derived indium tin oxide films, Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 96 (2009) 741–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-009-5157-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s00339-009-5157-7 2009

  33. [33]

    Chen, K.M

    M.F. Chen, K.M. Lin, Y. Sen Ho, Laser annealing process of ITO thin films using beam shaping technology, Opt. Lasers Eng. 50 (2012) 491–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2011.10.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.optlaseng.2011.10.002 2012

  34. [34]

    Frechilla, A

    A. Frechilla, A. Sekkat, M. Dibenedetto, F. lo Presti, L. Porta-Velilla, E. Martínez, G.F. de La Fuente, L.A. Angurel, D. Muñoz-Rojas, Generating colours through a novel approach based on spatial ALD and laser processing, Mater. Today Adv. 19 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtadv.2023.100414

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mtadv.2023.100414 2023

  35. [35]

    Becher, J

    M.J.M.J. Becher, J. Jagosz, R.-M. Neubieser, J.-L. Wree, A. Devi, M. Michel, C. Bock, E.L. Gurevich, A. Ostendorf, Ultrashort Pulse Laser Annealing of Amorphous Atomic Layer Deposited MoS2 Films, Adv. Eng. Mater. 25 (2023) 2300677. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202300677

    work page doi:10.1002/adem.202300677 2023

  36. [36]

    Mora, J.C

    M. Mora, J.C. Díez, C.I. López-Gascón, E. Martínez, G.F. De la Fuente, Laser textured Bi-2212 in planar geometries, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 13 (2003) 3188–3191. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2003.812192

    work page doi:10.1109/tasc.2003.812192 2003

  37. [37]

    Afanasjev, N

    V.P. Afanasjev, N. V. Mukhin, D.N. Redka, M. V. Rudenko, E.I. Terukov, A. Oseev, S. Hirsch, Surface modification of ZnO by plasma and laser treatment, Ferroelectrics. 508 (2017) 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00150193.2017.1289587. 20

    work page doi:10.1080/00150193.2017.1289587 2017

  38. [38]

    Levitskii, D.N

    V.S. Levitskii, D.N. Redka, E.I. Terukov, Optical and structural properties of ZnO thin films after laser treatment, Ferroelectrics. 496 (2016) 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00150193.2016.1157451

    work page doi:10.1080/00150193.2016.1157451 2016

  39. [39]

    Bhaumik, A.K

    G.K. Bhaumik, A.K. Nath, S. Basu, Laser annealing of zinc oxide thin film deposited by spray-CVD, Mater. Sci. Eng. B. 52 (1998) 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5107(97)00272-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s0921-5107(97)00272-9 1998

  40. [40]

    H. Lu, Y. Tu, X. Lin, B. Fang, D. Luo, A. Laaksonen, Effects of laser irradiation on the structure and optical properties of ZnO thin films, Mater. Lett. 64 (2010) 2072–2075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2010.06.022

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2010.06.022 2010

  41. [41]

    Tejada-Rosales, S

    E. Tejada-Rosales, S. Ondoño-Castillo, C. Díez, G.D. La Fuente, N. Casañ-Pastor, Annealing of electrophoretic YBa2Cu3O7 coatings on polycristaline substrates by zonal laser fusion, Bol. Soc. Esp. Ceram. Vidr. 78 (2014) 980–982. https://doi.org/10.7868/s0367676514080183

    work page doi:10.7868/s0367676514080183 2014

  42. [42]

    S. Jain, W. Medlin, S. Uprety, T. Isaacs-Smith, T. Olsson, J. Davis, S. Burrows, S. Chumley, M. Park, G.M. Laurent, Nanosecond-laser annealing of zinc oxide thin-films: The effect of the laser wavelength and fluence, Thin Solid Films. 791 (2024) 140236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2024.140236

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2024.140236 2024

  43. [43]

    Frechilla, M

    A. Frechilla, M. Napari, N. Strkalj, E. Barriuso, K. Niang, M. Hellenbrand, P. Strichovanec, F.M. Simanjuntak, G. Antorrena, A. Flewitt, C. Magén, G.F. de la Fuente, J.L. MacManus-Driscoll, L.A. Angurel, J.Á. Pardo, Spatially selective crystallization of ferroelectric Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 films induced by sub-nanosecond laser annealing, Appl. Mater. Today. 36 (20...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apmt.2023.102033 2024

  44. [44]

    Nguyen, U

    V.H. Nguyen, U. Gottlieb, A. Valla, D. Muñoz, D. Bellet, D. Muñoz-Rojas, Electron tunneling through grain boundaries in transparent conductive oxides and implications for electrical conductivity: The case of ZnO:Al thin films, Mater. Horizons. 5 (2018) 715–726. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8mh00402a

    work page doi:10.1039/c8mh00402a 2018

  45. [45]

    Y. Chen, X. Li, X. Li, J. Wang, Z. Tang, UV activated hollow ZnO microspheres for selective ethanol sensors at low temperatures, Sensors Actuators B Chem. 232 (2016) 158–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.03.138

    work page doi:10.1016/j.snb.2016.03.138 2016

  46. [46]

    Mishra, C

    S. Mishra, C. Ghanshyam, N. Ram, R.P. Bajpai, R.K. Bedi, Detection mechanism of metal oxide gas sensor under UV radiation, Sensors Actuators B Chem. 97 (2004) 387–390. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2003.09.017

    work page doi:10.1016/j.snb.2003.09.017 2004

  47. [47]

    Park, G.-J

    S. Park, G.-J. Sun, C. Jin, H.W. Kim, S. Lee, C. Lee, Synergistic Effects of a Combination of Cr2O3-Functionalization and UV-Irradiation Techniques on the Ethanol Gas Sensing Performance of ZnO Nanorod Gas Sensors, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 8 (2016) 2805–2811. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b11485

    work page doi:10.1021/acsami.5b11485 2016

  48. [48]

    Nguyen, A

    V.H. Nguyen, A. Sekkat, C. Jiménez, D. Muñoz, D. Bellet, D. Muñoz-Rojas, Impact of precursor exposure on process efficiency and film properties in spatial atomic layer deposition, Chem. Eng. J. 403 (2021) 126234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126234

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.126234 2021

  49. [49]

    Liu, Simple technique for measurements of pulsed Gaussian-beam spot sizes, Opt

    J.M. Liu, Simple technique for measurements of pulsed Gaussian-beam spot sizes, Opt. Lett. 7 (1982) 1980–1982

    work page 1982

  50. [50]

    West, Redox-active oxygen in oxides: emergent applications, including field-induced resistive switching, flash luminescence, p-n junctions and high capacity battery cathodes, J

    A.R. West, Redox-active oxygen in oxides: emergent applications, including field-induced resistive switching, flash luminescence, p-n junctions and high capacity battery cathodes, J. Mater. Chem. A. 11 (2023) 21 12681–12694. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ta00202k

    work page doi:10.1039/d3ta00202k 2023

  51. [51]

    B. Duan, Y. Li, J. Li, Y. Gao, P. Zhai, J. Yang, Z. Lu, H. Yang, H. Wang, G. Li, Regulation of oxygen vacancy and reduction of lattice thermal conductivity in ZnO ceramic by high temperature and high pressure method, Ceram. Int. 46 (2020) 26176–26181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.07.115

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.07.115 2020

  52. [52]

    G. Jian, L. Zhou, N.W. Piekiel, M.R. Zachariah, Low effective activation energies for oxygen release from metal oxides: Evidence for mass-transfer limits at high heating rates, ChemPhysChem. 15 (2014) 1666–1672. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201301148

    work page doi:10.1002/cphc.201301148 2014

  53. [53]

    Benramache, Y

    S. Benramache, Y. Aoun, S. Lakel, B. Benhaoua, The effect of film thickness on the structural, optical and electrical properties of ZnO thin films deposited by ultrasonic spray deposition, Mater. Res. Express. 6 (2019) 126418. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab574a

    work page doi:10.1088/2053-1591/ab574a 2019

  54. [54]

    T. V. Vimalkumar, N. Poornima, C.S. Kartha, K.P. Vijayakumar, Effect of precursor medium on structural, electrical and optical properties of sprayed polycrystalline ZnO thin films, Mater. Sci. Eng. B Solid-State Mater. Adv. Technol. 175 (2010) 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2010.06.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mseb.2010.06.012 2010

  55. [55]

    H.T. Dao, H. Makino, Enhancement in optoelectrical properties of polycrystalline ZnO thin films by Ar plasma, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 96 (2019) 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2019.02.026

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mssp.2019.02.026 2019

  56. [56]

    Abdel-Latif, M

    M.K. Abdel-Latif, M. Mobarak, N. Revaprasadu, A.H. Ashraf, W. Othman, M.M. Khalefa, A.A. Aboud, M. Ismail, Effect of doping on the structural, optical and electrical properties of La-doped ZnO thin films, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 34 (2023) 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-022- 09477-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s10854-022- 2023

  57. [57]

    Ellinger, S.F

    C.R. Ellinger, S.F. Nelson, Selective Area Spatial Atomic Layer Deposition of ZnO, Al2O3, and Aluminum-Doped ZnO Using Poly(vinyl pyrrolidone), Chem. Mater. 26 (2014) 1514−1522. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.1021/cm402464z

    work page doi:10.1021/cm402464z 2014

  58. [58]

    Illiberi, F

    A. Illiberi, F. Roozeboom, P. Poodt, Spatial Atomic Layer Deposition of Zinc Oxide Thin Films, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012,. 4 (2012) 268−272. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.1021/am2013097

    work page doi:10.1021/am2013097 2012

  59. [59]

    M. Zhao, Z. Sun, Z. Zhang, X. Geng, W. Wu, S.-Y. Lien, W.-Z. Zhu, Suppression of Oxygen Vacancy Defects in sALD-ZnO Films Annealed in Different Conditions, Materials (Basel). 13 (2020) 3910. https://doi.org/doi:10.3390/ma13183910

    work page doi:10.3390/ma13183910 2020

  60. [60]

    Nguyen, J

    V.H. Nguyen, J. Resende, C. Jiménez, J.-L. Deschanvres, P. Carroy, D. Muñoz, D. Bellet, D. Muñoz-Rojas, Deposition of ZnO based thin films by atmospheric pressure spatial atomic layer deposition for application in solar cells, J. Renew. Sustain. Energy. 9 (2017) 21203. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4979822

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4979822 2017

  61. [61]

    J. Wang, Z. Wang, B. Huang, Y. Ma, Y. Liu, X. Qin, X. Zhang, Y. Dai, Oxygen Vacancy Induced Band-Gap Narrowing and Enhanced Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity of ZnO, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 4 (2012) 4024–4030. https://doi.org/10.1021/am300835p

    work page doi:10.1021/am300835p 2012

  62. [62]

    Janotti, C.G

    A. Janotti, C.G. Van de Walle, Oxygen vacancies in ZnO, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87 (2005) 122102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2053360. 22 23 Supplementary information A. Frechilla1,2, J. Frechilla1, L. A. Angurel1, G. F. de La Fuente1 and D. Muñoz- Rojas2 1 Instituto de Nanociencia y Materiales de Aragón, CSIC-Universidad de Zaragoza, María de Luna 3, E-50018 Zar...

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2053360 2005