Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Rethinking RL Scaling for Vision Language Models: A Transparent, From-Scratch Framework and Comprehensive Evaluation Scheme

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.02587 v2 pith:C5EOAUZN submitted 2025-04-03 cs.LG cs.CLcs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CLcs.CV
keywords modelsevaluationframeworkvlmsdynamicsfindingsfrom-scratchlanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) has recently shown strong potential in improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models and is now being actively extended to vision-language models (VLMs). However, existing RL applications in VLMs often rely on heavily engineered frameworks that hinder reproducibility and accessibility, while lacking standardized evaluation protocols, making it difficult to compare results or interpret training dynamics. This work introduces a transparent, from-scratch framework for RL in VLMs, offering a minimal yet functional four-step pipeline validated across multiple models and datasets. In addition, a standardized evaluation scheme is proposed to assess training dynamics and reflective behaviors. Extensive experiments on visual reasoning tasks uncover key empirical findings: response length is sensitive to random seeds, reflection correlates with output length, and RL consistently outperforms supervised fine-tuning (SFT) in generalization, even with high-quality data. These findings, together with the proposed framework, aim to establish a reproducible baseline and support broader engagement in RL-based VLM research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. StructVRM: Aligning Multimodal Reasoning with Structured and Verifiable Reward Models

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A model-based verifier that grades sub-question-level correctness supplies fine-grained RL rewards, and training with it yields a VLM that tops several multimodal reasoning benchmarks, including the authors' new STEM-Bench.

  2. AdapThink: Adaptive Thinking Preferences for Reasoning Language Model

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AdapThink is an RL post-training framework that adaptively reduces overthinking and underthinking in reasoning language models by rewarding confidence-appropriate reasoning depth and diverse training samples.

  3. An Explainable Machine Learning Framework for Railway Predictive Maintenance using Data Streams from the Metro Operator of Portugal

    cs.AI 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    The submitted document is internally inconsistent: the abstract describes railway predictive maintenance while the body presents an unrelated multimodal reward-model paper, leaving the reported fault-prediction result...

  4. Reinforcement Fine-Tuning Powers Reasoning Capability of Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey-style position paper claims that reinforcement fine-tuning powers reasoning in multimodal LLMs, summarizing over a hundred recent works and proposing five future research directions.

Pith tools