REVIEW 1 cited by
Evaluating the Generalization Capabilities of Large Language Models on Code Reasoning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We assess how the code reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) generalize to different kinds of programs. We present techniques for obtaining in- and out-of-distribution programs with different characteristics: code sampled from a domain-specific language, code automatically generated by an LLM, code collected from competitive programming contests, and mutated versions of these programs. We also present an experimental methodology for evaluating LLM generalization by comparing their performance on these programs. We perform an extensive evaluation across 10 state-of-the-art models from the past year, obtaining insights into their generalization capabilities over time and across different classes of programs. Our results highlight that while earlier models exhibit behavior consistent with pattern matching, the latest models exhibit strong generalization abilities on code reasoning.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Mitigating Spurious Correlations in LLMs via Causality-Aware Post-Training
Fine-tuning a 3B LLM on randomly symbolized reasoning questions reduces spurious-correlation failures and improves OOD accuracy on CLadder and PrOntoQA.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.