Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Object-Level Verbalized Confidence Calibration in Vision-Language Models via Semantic Perturbation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.14848 v1 pith:ZKJMBYAS submitted 2025-04-21 cs.CV cs.AI

Object-Level Verbalized Confidence Calibration in Vision-Language Models via Semantic Perturbation

classification cs.CV cs.AI
keywords confidencecalibrationverbalizedmodelsperturbationresponsesemanticvlms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Vision-language models (VLMs) excel in various multimodal tasks but frequently suffer from poor calibration, resulting in misalignment between their verbalized confidence and response correctness. This miscalibration undermines user trust, especially when models confidently provide incorrect or fabricated information. In this work, we propose a novel Confidence Calibration through Semantic Perturbation (CSP) framework to improve the calibration of verbalized confidence for VLMs in response to object-centric queries. We first introduce a perturbed dataset where Gaussian noise is applied to the key object regions to simulate visual uncertainty at different confidence levels, establishing an explicit mapping between visual ambiguity and confidence levels. We further enhance calibration through a two-stage training process combining supervised fine-tuning on the perturbed dataset with subsequent preference optimization. Extensive experiments on popular benchmarks demonstrate that our method significantly improves the alignment between verbalized confidence and response correctness while maintaining or enhancing overall task performance. These results highlight the potential of semantic perturbation as a practical tool for improving the reliability and interpretability of VLMs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Grounded or Guessing? LVLM Confidence Estimation via Blind-Image Contrastive Ranking

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    BICR uses blind-image contrastive ranking on frozen LVLM hidden states to train a lightweight probe that penalizes confidence on blacked-out inputs, yielding top calibration and discrimination across five models and m...

  2. Grounded or Guessing? LVLM Confidence Estimation via Blind-Image Contrastive Ranking

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    BICR trains a lightweight probe on contrastive hidden states from real versus blind images to detect visual grounding in LVLM predictions, outperforming baselines on calibration and discrimination with fewer parameters.

  3. Can You Trust the Confidence? ConfBench for Vision-Language Models on Document Extraction

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0

    Vision-language models vary widely in how trustworthy their confidence scores are on document extraction, with stronger models and OCR-plus-image input helping most, as measured on the new ConfBench benchmark.