Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 65 references

Wigner multiplets in QFT: from Wigner degeneracy to Elko fields

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read If a spin-1/2 fermion carries the two-fold Wigner degeneracy and is written as a superposition of the degenerate spinor fields, canonical quantization forces it to be the Elko field, a mass-dimension-one spinor with Klein-Gordon kinematics.

desk verdict A careful formal derivation that canonical quantization forces the Elko condition for the Wigner superposition field, undercut only by a uniqueness claim that outruns the tested dual-space. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.15116 v2 pith:4RDETMBI submitted 2025-04-21 hep-th hep-ph

Cheng-Yang Lee , Ruifeng Leng , Siyi Zhou This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thhep-ph
keywords WignerdegeneracyElkofieldmassdimensiononeKlein-Gordonkinematicscanonicalquantizationchargeconjugationdarkmatter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a spin-1/2 fermion carrying the two-fold Wigner degeneracy—a discrete degree of freedom allowed by the extended Poincaré group—must, when written as a coherent superposition of the two degenerate spinor fields, be the Elko field. Starting from the most general Lorentz-covariant superposition, the authors impose causality, then canonical anticommutation relations and a positive-definite free Hamiltonian. These requirements force the relative phase factors in the polarizations to satisfy $b_u = b_v = 0$, the Elko condition, and reject the Dirac-type constructions. The surviving field has mass dimension one and obeys the Klein-Gordon equation rather than the Dirac equation, and the paper shows that being an eigenstate of charge conjugation is only a basis-dependent feature of Elko, not its defining property. A sympathetic reader would care because this singles out a specific beyond-Standard-Model fermion candidate whose interactions with known matter are suppressed by the mass-dimension mismatch, making it a natural dark-matter candidate.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the pair of sign factors $b_{u,n}$ and $b_{v,n}$ labeling whether the rest-frame polarizations satisfy $p_\mu \gamma^\mu u_n = m b_{u,n} u_n$ and $p_\mu \gamma^\mu v_n = m b_{v,n} v_n$. The Elko condition $b_u = \sum_n b_{u,n} = 0$ and $b_v = \sum_n b_{v,n} = 0$ (equivalently $\Delta = -1$) is what makes the Elko dual orthonormal and the Klein-Gordon canonical commutators work. The Elko dual field $\neg\lambda(x) = (i m^{-1}\gamma^\mu \partial_\mu \lambda)^\dagger \gamma^0$ supplies the second canonical variable that the Dirac dual cannot provide in the Klein-Gordon framework.

What would settle it

Find a Lorentz-covariant, local dual for $\lambda(x)$ distinct from the Dirac and Elko duals that still yields $\{\lambda, \pi\} = i\delta$, causality, and a positive Hamiltonian without imposing $b_u = b_v = 0$; the theorem then falls.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Canonical quantization of the Wigner superposition field $\lambda(x) = (\psi_{+1/2} + \psi_{-1/2})/\sqrt{2}$ can be carried out inside the Klein-Gordon framework, with the Elko dual $\neg\lambda(x) = (i m^{-1}\gamma^\mu \partial_\mu \lambda)^\dagger \gamma^0$ as the conjugate variable, if and only if $b_u = b_v = 0$ (equivalently $\Delta = -1$). This is the Elko condition. Under it the equal-time anticommutator $\{\lambda, \pi\} = i \delta^{(3)}\delta$ holds and the normal-ordered Hamiltonian is a sum over Wigner-degenerate particle and antiparticle modes with positive energy. The Dirac Lagrangian with either the Dirac dual or the Elko dual fails: the first produces a wrong Hamiltonian that mixes the two Wigner degeneracies, and the second reduces to the same incorrect Hamiltonian; the Klein-Gordon Lagrangian with the Dirac dual fails to give canonical anticommutators. Hence Elko, a spinor of mass dimension one obeying Klein-Gordon kinematics, is the unique consistent realization of the Wigner superposition field.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on assuming the Dirac dual and the Elko dual are the only admissible adjoint structures for quantizing the superposition field; if another dual exists, the claimed uniqueness could fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the Wigner doublet exists in nature, it cannot be described by a Dirac superposition field; any such superposition must either be an Elko field or be repackaged as a doublet field $\Psi$.
  • The Elko condition is a phase relation between Wigner-degenerate polarizations, so charge-conjugation eigenspinor status is not a physical invariant—phenomenology should be built from the phase relation instead.
  • Because the Elko field has mass dimension one, its free Hamiltonian is positive and its self-interactions are renormalizable, making it a viable self-interacting dark-matter candidate.
  • The mismatch between Elko's mass dimension and Standard-Model matter fields suppresses Elko–SM couplings, offering a natural explanation for why Elko would be dark.
  • The free theory is invariant under the internal time-reversal-like symmetry $\hat{S}_T$; a physically complete theory with a nontrivial Wigner degeneracy must break this symmetry through interactions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not classify all possible duals, so the uniqueness theorem is conditional: a systematic enumeration of local Lorentz-covariant duals would either close the gap or produce a new quantizable superposition field.
  • The $\sqrt{m}$ rescaling makes the massless limit singular; if a smooth $m \to 0$ limit cannot be defined, Wigner-degenerate fermions would be intrinsically massive, which a future study of spontaneous symmetry breaking could test.
  • The pseudo-Hermitian nature of Elko interactions suggests that phenomenological predictions require the non-Hermitian or PT-symmetric formalism; concrete cross-section predictions could distinguish this framework from Dirac fermion dark matter.
  • Because charge-conjugation properties are basis artifacts, experimental searches should target the relative-phase relation (for example, via Elko's specific two-point functions) rather than C-eigenvalue signatures.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper develops a 'Wigner superposition field' λ(x) built from two spin-1/2 fields carrying the two-fold Wigner degeneracy n=±1/2, with each mode satisfying p·γu = m b_{u,n}u and p·γv = m b_{v,n}v for sign factors b_{u,n}, b_{v,n}. After imposing Lorentz covariance and causality, the paper studies canonical quantization in four frameworks: Dirac dual with a Dirac Lagrangian, Dirac dual with a Klein-Gordon Lagrangian, Elko dual with a Dirac Lagrangian, and Elko dual with a Klein-Gordon Lagrangian (Sections 4.1–4.4). It finds that only the last option, subject to the Elko condition b_u=b_v=0 (equivalently Δ=-1), yields both the canonical equal-time anticommutation relation and a positive, Wigner-degeneracy-diagonal free Hamiltonian. The paper concludes that the Wigner superposition field is uniquely realized by the Elko field, a mass-dimension-one spinor obeying Klein-Gordon kinematics, and that traditional properties such as being charge-conjugation eigenspinors are basis artifacts. It closes with remarks on Elko as a dark matter candidate and on open problems including interactions and the massless limit.

Significance. If the central uniqueness claim is accepted, the paper would provide a first-principles derivation of Elko from Wigner degeneracy plus standard QFT requirements, with no fitted parameters. The analysis is explicit and easy to follow: the step-by-step elimination of the Dirac-dual and Wigner-Klein-Gordon options is transparent, Eq. (4.45) directly shows that the Elko condition is needed for canonical anticommutation within the Elko-Klein-Gordon framework, and the basis-redefinition discussion in Sections 2.4 and 4.4 usefully separates intrinsic properties from basis artifacts. The paper also honestly acknowledges limitations, including the pseudo-Hermitian character of many interactions and the singular massless limit. The significance is conditional, however, because the 'uniqueness' claim is only established within a restricted candidate space of adjoint structures, as detailed below.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 4.4, Eq. (4.45); Section 2.3, Eq. (2.54)] The central claim that canonical quantization uniquely selects the Elko condition is an 'if and only if' only within the specific family of duals consisting of the Dirac dual (2.40) and the Elko dual (2.54). The Elko dual is introduced in Section 2.3 explicitly to make Elko quantizable, so testing it alongside the Dirac dual does not by itself exclude other Lorentz-covariant dual structures. A dual such as λ^D = α \barλ + β ¬λ, or more generally an n-dependent combination Σ_n c_n \overline{ψ_n}, would produce a different canonical momentum and a different equal-time anticommutator; the paper does not analyze whether some configuration with b_u ≠ 0 could satisfy the canonical anticommutation relations for such duals. Since the abstract and Section 4.4 claim 'uniquely identify' and 'if and only if', the authors should either provide a classification of admissible local Lorentz-covariant duals (e.g., using the on-shell relations p·γ u = m b_u u to show that any such dual reduces to a linear combination of the two considered) or weaken the claim to state that the Elko dual provides a consistent quantization rather than the unique one.
  2. [Section 4.1, Eq. (4.21)] The Dirac framework is rejected because the Hamiltonian (4.19) contains the 'wrong mixing' term (4.21) between different Wigner degeneracies. This rejection presumes that the free Hamiltonian must be diagonal in the Wigner degeneracy n. That requirement is not derived from Lorentz covariance, causality, or canonical quantization, nor is it stated as an explicit axiom; it is introduced as 'wrong' on physical grounds. Since n-diagonality is one of the criteria that ultimately selects the Elko sector, the selection argument is not fully self-contained. The authors should state this requirement explicitly as part of the definition of a physical Wigner doublet and justify it, for example by the condition that n be a good quantum number in the free theory.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.4, Eqs. (4.54)–(4.56)] The derivation of the positive diagonal Hamiltonian (4.53) requires cancellation of the e^{±2iE_p t} terms among the three contributions (4.54)–(4.56). The text says this follows from the ortho-normalization relations (2.69), but the cancellation is not shown. Since positivity and diagonality of H0 are used to eliminate the Dirac-based frameworks, an explicit display of this cancellation would make the argument easier to verify.
  2. [Section 1, paragraph 1] There is a typo in the first paragraph: 'develop the the-ory' should read 'develop the theory'.
  3. [Section 4.1, Eq. (4.4)] The Dirac condition (4.4) allows b=±1, but Section 4.1 states 'we impose b=1' and analyzes only that case. The authors should briefly explain why b=-1 is equivalent or otherwise does not alter the conclusion that the superposition field cannot be used in the Dirac framework.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Claimed uniqueness of Elko is conditional on the Elko dual, which is introduced specifically to canonically quantize Elko; the CAR condition b_u=0 is the consistency condition of that purpose-built adjoint.

  1. ansatz smuggled in via citation [Sec. 2.3, Eq. (2.54) and Sec. 4.4, Eqs. (4.42)-(4.45), conclusion after Eq. (4.45)]
    "One may be puzzled as to why we have introduced a new dual field. The reason for introducing ¬λ(x) is to canonically quantize Elko. ... These results demonstrate that the canonical quantization can be successfully implemented within the Klein-Gordon framework for the fields λ(x) and ¬λ(x) if and only if bu = bv = 0 (or equivalently Δ = −1), which coincides with the Elko condition (2.50)-(2.51)."

    Eq. (2.56) gives ¬u_n(p,σ)=b_{u,n} bar-u_n(p,σ), so the polarization sum in Eq. (2.67) contains b_u=Σ_n b_{u,n}. The canonical momentum π=dot-¬λ (4.42) then makes the p·γ term in the CAR (4.45) proportional to b_u, so {λ,π}=iδ forces b_u=0, i.e. the Elko condition (2.50). Because Sec. 2.3 introduces ¬λ expressly 'to canonically quantize Elko' and cites the same-authors' Ref. [59], the 'iff' conclusion is the consistency condition for a pre-selected, purpose-built adjoint. Only the Dirac and Elko duals are tested; mixed or derivative-modified Lorentz-covariant duals are not classified, so the claimed uniqueness is conditional on the Elko-dual ansatz.

full rationale

The paper's central computation (Sec. 4.4, Eq. (4.45)) is internally consistent and nontrivial: with λ and ¬λ as canonical variables, the equal-time anticommutator contains a term proportional to b_u, and canonical CAR indeed forces b_u=b_v=0, excluding the Dirac sign configuration (4.4). The Hamiltonian calculation is explicit, and no data fitting or renaming is involved. However, the derivation is mildly circular in its candidate space: the Elko dual is introduced in Sec. 2.3 specifically 'to canonically quantize Elko,' and its polarization structure (2.56)-(2.67) already injects b_u into the anticommutator. The paper tests only two adjoint structures, the Dirac dual and the Elko dual, rather than classifying all Lorentz-covariant duals; a mixed or derivative-modified dual would give a different canonical momentum and a different quantization condition. Thus the abstract's 'uniquely identify' and Sec. 4.4's 'if and only if' are conditional on a purpose-built ansatz imported from the same authors' earlier work. This warrants a moderate circularity score, though not a complete reduction: the sign-factor constraint is real algebra and has independent content once the Elko-dual framework is adopted.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central derivation assumes the Wigner doublet exists, that locality and canonical quantization are the right consistency criteria, and that only the Dirac and Elko duals need be considered. No numbers are fitted to data; the only adjustable discrete inputs are the sign factors, which the derivation forces to the Elko condition.

free parameters (1)
  • b_{u,+1/2}, b_{u,-1/2}, b_{v,+1/2}, b_{v,-1/2} = constrained to b_u = b_v = 0 (Elko condition)
    Discrete signs introduced in the rest-frame polarizations (2.13)-(2.16); they set the relative phases between Wigner-degenerate fields and are later forced by causality and canonical quantization.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The extended Poincare group admits physical states |p,sigma,n> with a two-fold Wigner degeneracy n = +/- 1/2 not present in the Standard Model.
    Stated in Section 1; no SM particle furnishes such a representation, so the existence of the doublet is an input, not a derived result of the paper.
  • domain assumption Spinor polarizations obey the momentum-space Dirac-like equations p_mu gamma^mu u_n = m b_{u,n} u_n and similarly for v (Eqs. 2.9-2.10).
    This follows from the (1/2,0) plus (0,1/2) representation and the chosen construction; it constrains the fields to Dirac-like spinor building blocks.
  • domain assumption Locality requires the anticommutator of the field with its chosen dual to vanish for spacelike separations.
    Standard causality condition used in Sections 2.2-2.4 to derive the constraint b_u + b_v = 0.
  • domain assumption Canonical quantization with equal-time anticommutation relations and a positive-definite free Hamiltonian is required.
    Standard QFT postulate applied throughout Section 4 to select among candidate Lagrangians.
  • ad hoc to paper The Dirac dual and the Elko dual defined in Eq. (2.54) are the only admissible dual structures for quantizing the superposition field.
    The Elko dual is introduced in Section 2.3 specifically to make Elko quantizable; the paper does not prove that no other dual structure exists.
  • ad hoc to paper The free Hamiltonian must be diagonal in the Wigner degeneracy n.
    Used in Section 4.1 to reject the Dirac-superposition field because of the Wigner-mixing term in Eq. (4.21); the paper does not justify this requirement from a deeper principle.
invented entities (2)
  • Wigner-degenerate fermion doublet (n = +/- 1/2)
    purpose: Provides the internal degree of freedom that the superposition field lambda(x) is built from.
    Postulated by the extended Poincare group program; no experimental evidence is cited, and the paper explicitly notes that no Standard Model particle has this property (Section 1).
  • Internal symmetry operator S-hat_T
    purpose: Exchanges the Wigner degeneracy and appears as an extra symmetry of the free Elko theory.
    Introduced in Section 3.1 as an additional unitary operator; the paper states that it must be broken in the interacting sector by a mechanism yet to be identified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Wigner multiplets in QFT: from Wigner degeneracy to Elko fields." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4RDETMBI

@misc{pith2026250415116,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Wigner multiplets in QFT: from Wigner degeneracy to Elko fields},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4RDETMBI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.15116}
}
read the original abstract

We establish the theoretical foundation of the Wigner superposition field, a quantum field framework for spin-1/2 fermions that exhibit a Wigner doublet -- a discrete quantum number arising from nontrivial representations of the extended Poincar\'{e} group. In contrast to the previously developed doublet formalism, which treats the Wigner degeneracy as a superficial label, the superposition formalism encodes it directly into the structure of a unified field via a coherent superposition of degenerate spinor fields. By imposing the Lorentz covariance, causality, and canonical quantization, we derive nontrivial constraints on the field configuration, which uniquely identify the Elko field as the consistent realization of the Wigner superposition field. Our analysis further clarifies that although the Elko field is a spinor field, it possesses mass dimension one and obeys the Klein-Gordon rather than the Dirac kinematics. Moreover, we explore the general Elko representation through basis redefinitions, showing that certain traditional properties, such as being eigenspinors of charge conjugation, are artifacts of specific basis choices rather than intrinsic features. Finally, we discuss the physical implications of Elko as a dark matter (DM) candidate. This work lays the foundation for a systematic reformulation of Elko interactions and its phenomenology as a viable component of DM.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D. V. Ahluwalia, J. M. H. da Silva, and C.-Y. Lee,Mass dimension one fields with Wigner degeneracy: A theory of dark matter, Nucl. Phys. B987 (2023) 116092, [arXiv:2212.13114]

    arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    D. V. Ahluwalia, G. B. de Gracia, J. M. H. da Silva, C.-Y. Lee, and B. M. Pimentel, Irreducible representations of the Poincaré group with reflections and two-fold Wigner degeneracy, JHEP 04 (2024) 075, [arXiv:2312.17038]

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    D. V. Ahluwalia and D. Grumiller,Spin half fermions with mass dimension one: Theory, phenomenology, and dark matter, JCAP 0507 (2005) 012, [hep-th/0412080]

    arXiv 2005

  4. [4]

    D. V. Ahluwalia and D. Grumiller,Dark matter: A spin one half fermion field with mass dimension one?, Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) 067701, [hep-th/0410192]

    arXiv 2005

  5. [5]

    Ahluwalia,Mass Dimension One Fermions

    D. Ahluwalia,Mass Dimension One Fermions. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2019

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    D. V. Ahluwalia, J. M. H. da Silva, C.-Y. Lee, Y.-X. Liu, S. H. Pereira, and M. M. Sorkhi, Mass dimension one fermions: Constructing darkness, Phys. Rept. 967 (2022) 1–43, [arXiv:2205.04754]

    arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    C.-Y. Lee, R. Leng, and S. Zhou,Wigner multiplets in QFT: dark sector and CPT-violating scenarios, JHEP 06 (2025) 054, [arXiv:2502.09684]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    D. V. Ahluwalia, J. T. Goldman, and M. B. Johnson,Majorana - like (j,0) x (0,j) representation spaces: Construction and physical interpretation, Mod. Phys. Lett. A9 (1994) 439–450, [hep-th/9307118]. – 28 –

    work page Pith review arXiv 1994

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    D. V. Ahluwalia, J. T. Goldman, and M. B. Johnson,(j,0) + (0,j) representation space: Majorana - like construct, Acta Phys. Polon. B25 (1994) 1267–1278, [hep-th/9312091]

    1994 arXiv

  2. [10]

    D. V. Ahluwalia,Extended set of Majorana spinors, a new dispersion relation, and a preferred frame, hep-ph/0305336

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    da Rocha and W

    R. da Rocha and W. A. Rodrigues, Jr.,Where are ELKO spinor fields in Lounesto spinor field classification?, Mod. Phys. Lett. A21 (2006) 65–74, [math-ph/0506075]

    2006 arXiv

  4. [12]

    da Rocha and J

    R. da Rocha and J. M. H. da Silva,ELKO, flagpole and flag-dipole spinor fields, and the instanton Hopf fibration, Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebras20 (2010) 847–870, [arXiv:0811.2717]

    2010 arXiv

  5. [13]

    J. M. H. da Silva and R. da Rocha,Unfolding Physics from the Algebraic Classification of Spinor Fields, Phys. Lett. B718 (2013) 1519–1523, [arXiv:1212.2406]

    2013 arXiv

  6. [14]

    da Rocha, L

    R. da Rocha, L. Fabbri, J. M. H. da Silva, R. T. Cavalcanti, and J. A. Silva-Neto,Flag-Dipole Spinor Fields in ESK Gravities, J. Math. Phys.54 (2013) 102505, [arXiv:1302.2262]

    2013 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Bonora, K

    L. Bonora, K. P. S. de Brito, and R. da Rocha,Spinor Fields Classification in Arbitrary Dimensions and New Classes of Spinor Fields on 7-Manifolds, JHEP 02 (2015) 069, [arXiv:1411.1590]

    2015 arXiv

  8. [16]

    R. T. Cavalcanti,Classification of Singular Spinor Fields and Other Mass Dimension One Fermions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D23 (2014), no. 14 1444002, [arXiv:1408.0720]

    2014 arXiv

  9. [17]

    da Rocha and R

    R. da Rocha and R. T. Cavalcanti,Flag-dipole and flagpole spinor fluid flows in Kerr spacetimes, Phys. Atom. Nucl.80 (2017), no. 2 329–333, [arXiv:1602.02441]

    2017 arXiv

  10. [18]

    J. M. H. da Silva and R. T. Cavalcanti,Revealing how different spinors can be: the Lounesto spinor classification, Mod. Phys. Lett. A32 (2017), no. 35 1730032, [arXiv:1708.06222]

    2017 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Fabbri and R

    L. Fabbri and R. da Rocha,Unveiling a spinor field classification with non-Abelian gauge symmetries, Phys. Lett. B780 (2018) 427–431, [arXiv:1711.07873]

    2018 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Meert and R

    P. Meert and R. da Rocha,The emergence of flagpole and flag-dipole fermions in fluid/gravity correspondence, Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018), no. 12 1012, [arXiv:1809.01104]

    2018 arXiv

  13. [21]

    M. R. A. Arcodía, M. Bellini, and R. da Rocha,The Heisenberg spinor field classification and its interplay with the Lounesto’s classification, Eur. Phys. J. C79 (2019), no. 3 260, [arXiv:1902.08833]

    2019 arXiv

  14. [22]

    R. J. B. Rogerio, A. R. Aguirre, and C. H. C. Villalobos,Flag-dipole spinors: On the dual structure derivation andC,P andT symmetries, Eur. Phys. J. C80 (2020), no. 5 380, [arXiv:2003.07766]

    2020 arXiv

  15. [23]

    R. J. B. Rogerio,From Dipole spinors to a new class of mass dimension one fermions, Mod. Phys. Lett. A35 (2020), no. 39 2050319, [arXiv:2009.08318]

    2020 arXiv

  16. [24]

    R. J. B. Rogerio,Spin-half fermions endowed with bosonic traces —Towards phases and classes, EPL 134 (2021), no. 6 61001, [arXiv:2104.07065]

    2021 arXiv

  17. [25]

    R. J. B. Rogerio and L. Fabbri,Exploiting new classes of mass-dimension one fermions, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A478 (2022), no. 2262 20210893, [arXiv:2203.05992]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Basak and S

    A. Basak and S. Shankaranarayanan,Super-inflation and generation of first order vector perturbations in Elko, JCAP 1505 (2015) 034, [arXiv:1410.5768]

    2015 arXiv

  19. [27]

    C. G. Boehmer,The Einstein-Cartan-Elko system, Annalen Phys. 16 (2007) 38–44, [gr-qc/0607088]. – 29 –

    2007 arXiv

  20. [28]

    C. G. Boehmer,The Einstein-Elko system: Can dark matter drive inflation?, Annalen Phys. 16 (2007) 325–341, [gr-qc/0701087]

    2007 arXiv

  21. [29]

    C. G. Boehmer and J. Burnett,Dark spinors with torsion in cosmology, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 104001, [arXiv:0809.0469]

    2008 arXiv

  22. [30]

    C. G. Boehmer,Dark spinor inflation: Theory primer and dynamics, Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 123535, [arXiv:0804.0616]

    2008 arXiv

  23. [31]

    C. G. Boehmer and J. Burnett,Dark energy with dark spinors, Mod. Phys. Lett. A25 (2010) 101–110, [arXiv:0906.1351]

    2010 arXiv

  24. [32]

    C. G. Boehmer, J. Burnett, D. F. Mota, and D. J. Shaw,Dark spinor models in gravitation and cosmology, JHEP 07 (2010) 053, [arXiv:1003.3858]

    2010 arXiv

  25. [33]

    J. M. H. da Silva and S. H. Pereira,Exact solutions to Elko spinors in spatially flat Friedmann-Robertson-Walker spacetimes, JCAP 03 (2014) 009, [arXiv:1401.3252]

    2014 arXiv

  26. [34]

    S. H. Pereira, S. A. P. S., and J. M. H. da Silva,Some remarks on the attractor behaviour in ELKO cosmology, JCAP 08 (2014) 020, [arXiv:1402.6723]

    2014 arXiv

  27. [35]

    A. P. S. Souza, S. H. Pereira, and J. F. Jesus,A new approach on the stability analysis in ELKO cosmology, Eur. Phys. J. C75 (2015), no. 1 36, [arXiv:1407.3401]

    2015 arXiv

  28. [36]

    S. H. Pereira and A. P. S. Souza,ELKO applications in cosmology, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D23 (2014), no. 14 1444008

    2014

  29. [37]

    S. H. Pereira, A. P. S. Souza, J. M. H. da Silva, and J. F. Jesus,Λ(t) cosmology induced by a slowly varying Elko field, JCAP 01 (2017) 055, [arXiv:1608.02777]

    2017 arXiv

  30. [38]

    S. H. Pereira and R. C. Lima,Creation of mass dimension one fermionic particles in asymptotically expanding universe, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D26 (2017), no. 12 1730028, [arXiv:1612.02240]

    2017 arXiv

  31. [39]

    S. H. Pereira and T. M. Guimarães,From inflation to recent cosmic acceleration: The fermionic Elko field driving the evolution of the universe, JCAP 09 (2017) 038, [arXiv:1702.07385]

    2017 arXiv

  32. [40]

    S. H. Pereira, R. F. L. Holanda, and A. P. S. Souza,Evolution of the universe driven by a mass dimension one fermion field, EPL 120 (2017), no. 3 31001, [arXiv:1703.07636]

    2017 arXiv

  33. [41]

    R. J. B. Rogerio, J. M. H. da Silva, M. Dias, and S. H. Pereira,Effective lagrangian for a mass dimension one fermionic field in curved spacetime, JHEP 02 (2018) 145, [arXiv:1709.08707]

    2018 arXiv

  34. [42]

    S. H. Pereira and R. S. Costa,Partition function for a mass dimension one fermionic field and the dark matter halo of galaxies, Mod. Phys. Lett. A34 (2019), no. 16 1950126, [arXiv:1807.06944]

    2019 arXiv

  35. [43]

    S. H. Pereira, M. E. S. Alves, and T. M. Guimarães,An unified cosmological evolution driven by a mass dimension one fermionic field, Eur. Phys. J. C79 (2019), no. 6 543, [arXiv:1811.00390]

    2019 arXiv

  36. [44]

    S. H. Pereira, R. C. Lima, M. E. S. Alves, T. M. Guimarães, J. F. Jesus, and A. P. S. Souza, Cosmology with mass dimension one fields: recent developments, Eur. Phys. J. ST229 (2020), no. 11 2079–2116

    2020

  37. [45]

    S. H. Pereira,Degeneracy pressure of mass dimension one fermionic fields and the dark matter halo of galaxies, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D31 (2022), no. 07 2250056, [arXiv:2110.12890]. – 30 –

    2022 arXiv

  38. [46]

    R. C. Lima, T. M. Guimarães, and S. H. Pereira,A pilot study on canonical gravity with mass dimension one fermions, JHEP 09 (2022) 132, [arXiv:2206.13941]

    2022 arXiv

  39. [47]

    I. C. Jardim, G. Alencar, R. R. Landim, and R. N. Costa Filho,Solutions to the problem of Elko spinor localization in brane models, Phys. Rev. D91 (2015) 085008, [arXiv:1411.6962]

    2015 arXiv

  40. [48]

    D. M. Dantas, R. da Rocha, and C. A. S. Almeida,Exotic Elko on String-Like Defects in Six Dimensions, EPL 117 (2017), no. 5 51001, [arXiv:1512.07888]

    2017 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Zhou, Y.-Z

    X.-N. Zhou, Y.-Z. Du, Z.-H. Zhao, and Y.-X. Liu,Localization of five-dimensional Elko spinors with non-minimal coupling on thick branes, Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018), no. 6 493, [arXiv:1710.02842]

    2018 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Zhou, Y.-Z

    X.-N. Zhou, Y.-Z. Du, X.-Y. Ma, and Z.-H. Zhao,Localization of five-dimensional Elko spinors on dS/AdS thick branes, Chin. Phys. C46 (2022), no. 2 023101, [arXiv:1812.08332]

    2022 arXiv

  43. [51]

    M. M. Sorkhi and Z. Ghalenovi,Localization of massless Elko spinor fields on de Sitter thick branes, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A33 (2018), no. 29 1850172

    2018

  44. [52]

    M. M. Sorkhi and Z. Ghalenovi,Localization of Elko spinor fields in tachyonic de Sitter braneworld models, Eur. Phys. J. C80 (2020), no. 4 314

    2020

  45. [53]

    M. Dias, F. de Campos, and J. M. Hoff da Silva,Exploring Elko typical signature, Phys. Lett. B 706 (2012) 352–359, [arXiv:1012.4642]

    2012 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Agarwal, P

    B. Agarwal, P. Jain, S. Mitra, A. C. Nayak, and R. K. Verma,ELKO fermions as dark matter candidates, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 075027, [arXiv:1407.0797]

    2015 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Alves, F

    A. Alves, F. de Campos, M. Dias, and J. M. H. da Silva,Searching for Elko dark matter spinors at the CERN LHC, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A30 (2015), no. 01 1550006, [arXiv:1401.1127]

    2015 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Alves, M

    A. Alves, M. Dias, and F. de Campos,Perspectives for an Elko Phenomenology using Monojets at the 14 TeV LHC, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D23 (2014), no. 14 1444005, [arXiv:1410.3766]

    2014 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Alves, M

    A. Alves, M. Dias, F. de Campos, L. Duarte, and J. M. Hoff da Silva,Constraining Elko Dark Matter at the LHC with Monophoton Events, EPL 121 (2018), no. 3 31001, [arXiv:1712.05180]

    2018 arXiv

  50. [58]

    C. A. Moura, F. Kamiya, L. Duarte, M. Dias, and J. M. H. da Silva,Sensitivity of accelerator-based neutrino experiments to neutrino-dark matter interaction: Elko as a viable dark matter candidate, EPL 140 (2022), no. 1 10002, [arXiv:2109.03881]

    2022 arXiv

  51. [59]

    G. B. de Gracia, R. da Rocha, R. J. B. Rogerio, and C.-Y. Lee,On Wigner degeneracy in Elko theory: Hermiticity and dark matter, Phys. Dark Univ.47 (2025) 101774, [arXiv:2407.00126]

    2025 arXiv

  52. [60]

    T. D. Lee and G. C. Wick,Space Inversion, Time Reversal, and Other Discrete Symmetries in Local Field Theories, Phys. Rev. 148 (1966) 1385–1404

    1966

  53. [61]

    F. A. da Silva Barbosa and J. M. H. da Silva,Non-standard Wigner doublets, EPL 144 (2023), no. 5 54001, [arXiv:2312.07675]

    2023 arXiv

  54. [62]

    G. B. a. de Gracia, R. J. B. Rogerio, and L. Fabbri,Unraveling the physical meaning behind Elko’s dual structure, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A A480 (2024) 20240349, [arXiv:2408.16196]

    2024 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Mostafazadeh,PseudoHermiticity versus PT symmetry

    A. Mostafazadeh,PseudoHermiticity versus PT symmetry. The necessary condition for the reality of the spectrum, J. Math. Phys.43 (2002) 205–214, [math-ph/0107001]. – 31 –

    2002 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Mostafazadeh,Pseudo-Hermitian Representation of Quantum Mechanics, Int

    A. Mostafazadeh,Pseudo-Hermitian Representation of Quantum Mechanics, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.7 (2010) 1191–1306, [arXiv:0810.5643]

    2010 arXiv

  57. [65]

    M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder,An Introduction to quantum field theory. Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1995. – 32 –

    1995

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.