REVIEW 2 cited by
AdaViP: Aligning Multi-modal LLMs via Adaptive Vision-enhanced Preference Optimization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
AdaViP: Aligning Multi-modal LLMs via Adaptive Vision-enhanced Preference Optimization
read the original abstract
Preference alignment through Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has demonstrated significant effectiveness in aligning multimodal large language models (MLLMs) with human preferences. However, existing methods focus primarily on language preferences while neglecting the critical visual context. In this paper, we propose an Adaptive Vision-enhanced Preference optimization (AdaViP) that addresses these limitations through two key innovations: (1) vision-based preference pair construction, which integrates multiple visual foundation models to strategically remove key visual elements from the image, enhancing MLLMs' sensitivity to visual details; and (2) adaptive preference optimization that dynamically balances vision- and language-based preferences for more accurate alignment. Extensive evaluations across different benchmarks demonstrate our effectiveness. Notably, our AdaViP-7B achieves 93.7% and 96.4% reductions in response-level and mentioned-level hallucination respectively on the Object HalBench, significantly outperforming current state-of-the-art methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Experience Augmented Policy Optimization for LLM Reasoning
EAPO injects a prior RL policy's token choices at critical decision points during rollout and beats standard RLVR baselines on math and science reasoning benchmarks.
-
Experience Augmented Policy Optimization for LLM Reasoning
EAPO reuses prior RL policy experience adaptively at decision points in LLM rollouts with adapted importance sampling and reports gains over prior RLVR methods on math benchmarks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.