Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 177 references

Electroweak form factors of baryons in dense nuclear matter

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In symmetric nuclear matter, octet baryon electroweak form factors are suppressed with density and more for light baryons than strange ones.

desk verdict Useful consolidation of a model with one genuinely new density scan, but the axial flavor hierarchy rests on an untested equal-ratio assumption in Eq. (45). read the letter →

arxiv 2504.15660 v2 pith:JZRNHI2X submitted 2025-04-22 nucl-th hep-exhep-lathep-phnucl-ex

G. Ramalho , K. Tsushima , Myung-Ki Cheoun This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-thhep-exhep-lathep-phnucl-ex
keywords baryonoctetelectromagneticformfactorsaxialnuclearmediumquark-mesoncouplingmodelcovariantquarkneutrinocrosssectionsdensematter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the electromagnetic and axial form factors of the baryon octet — the functions describing how these particles respond to photon and weak probes — change when the baryons are immersed in symmetric nuclear matter. Combining a covariant constituent quark model with a quark–meson coupling model of the medium, it derives suppression that grows with density and with momentum transfer, and is stronger for light baryons than for baryons containing strange quarks. At normal nuclear density and $Q^2\simeq 2$ GeV$^2$, the axial form factor for the $n\to p$ transition is suppressed by about 30%, while the suppression for the heavier $\Xi^-\to\Lambda$ transition is about 15%. The central practical consequence is that in-medium neutrino and antineutrino cross sections on nucleons are reduced relative to free space, which matters for interpreting neutrino–nucleus experiments and neutrino propagation in dense matter.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a two-layer hadron model: valence quark cores described by covariant spectator quark–diquark wave functions (with S- and P-state admixture for axial transitions) plus a meson-cloud dressing, extended to matter by the quark–meson coupling model. Medium effects enter by replacing free hadron masses with density-dependent effective masses, rescaling baryon–meson couplings through the Goldberger–Treiman relation of Eq. (45), and using a density-dependent pion decay constant; the in-medium axial coupling ratio $g_A^*/g_A$ from bag-model/QMC input calibrates the axial quenching.

What would settle it

A precise measurement of the electric-to-magnetic form factor ratio $G_E/G_M$ for protons bound in $^4$He at $Q^2\approx 0.5$ GeV$^2$ with uncertainty below 5% would test the model's density dependence, since the predicted double ratios at $\rho=0.5\rho_0$ and $\rho=\rho_0$ differ by about 10%; data falling outside that band would refute the predicted medium-dependence pattern.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the electroweak structure of octet baryons is flavor-dependent in a nuclear medium: the electric, magnetic, axial-vector, and induced pseudoscalar form factors are all modified relative to free space, with modifications that increase with density and momentum transfer and are stronger for baryons made of light quarks than for baryons carrying strange quarks. In particular, the axial-vector form factor for the $n\to p$ transition is quenched by about 30% at $Q^2\simeq 2$ GeV$^2$ at saturation density, whereas the $\Xi^-\to\Lambda$ transition is quenched by only about 15%. The same pattern suppresses in-medium neutrino and antineutrino single-differential cross sections on nucleons, and the formalism extends to hyperon transitions at densities above normal nuclear matter, where the pion decay constant is taken to saturate near $3\rho_0$.

Load-bearing premise

The entire density and flavor dependence rests on the QMC model inputs — the in-medium baryon and meson masses, the ratio $g_A^*/g_A$, and the use of the Goldberger–Treiman relation with a common $g_A^*/g_A$ ratio for all octet baryons; above normal density it also relies on an unpublished saturation model for the pion decay constant.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For protons bound in a nucleus, the predicted double ratio $(G_E^*/G_M^*)/(G_E/G_M)$ drops by about 10 percentage points between average densities $\rho=0.5\rho_0$ and $\rho=\rho_0$, so polarized electron-scattering measurements on different nuclei could distinguish their average densities.
  • For the neutron, the same double ratio is predicted to be enhanced by roughly 10% near $Q^2=0.5$ GeV$^2$ at intermediate densities, with the enhancement driven by the in-medium increase of the neutron charge radius.
  • The induced pseudoscalar form factor for $|\Delta I|=1$ transitions is strongly suppressed at low $Q^2$ because both the in-medium baryon masses and the axial-vector form factor are reduced; heavier $|\Delta S|=1$ transitions show milder suppression because the in-medium kaon mass partly cancels the effect.
  • Neutrino and antineutrino single-differential cross sections on nucleons in matter are reduced relative to free space, and the reduction grows with density and neutrino energy.
  • The formalism predicts continued suppression beyond $\rho_0$, affecting neutrino and antineutrino reactions with hyperons in dense matter such as the cores of compact stars.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension not pursued in the paper is to apply the same flavor-dependent medium machinery to decuplet baryons and octet–decuplet transitions; if the pattern holds, strangeness-rich environments such as hypernuclei and neutron-star cores would exhibit non-uniform quenching of weak couplings, changing predicted neutrino opacities.
  • Because the predicted suppression grows with $Q^2$, neutrino experiments at higher momentum transfer (for example kaon-decay-at-rest neutrinos) should show stronger medium effects than low-energy coherent-scattering measurements; comparing cross sections at two well-separated energies would provide a sharp test of the density and $Q^2$ scaling.
  • The model's assumption that the quark axial form factor tracks the isovector Dirac form factor of the nucleon could be checked independently with future lattice QCD calculations of hyperon axial transitions, which would anchor the flavor dependence without relying on the medium input.
  • The density dependence above $\rho_0$ rests on a saturation model for the pion decay constant; this input could be tested by in-medium pion decay or pion–nucleus scattering data, if such measurements become precise enough to constrain $f_\pi^*(\rho)$ directly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reviews and extends a combined covariant spectator quark model and quark-meson coupling (QMC) framework to compute electromagnetic and axial form factors of the octet baryons in symmetric nuclear matter. It decomposes form factors into valence quark and meson cloud contributions, implements medium modifications through in-medium masses and baryon-meson couplings, and presents numerical results for densities up to rho0, with an extension to 2 rho0. The central claims are that medium effects increase with density, are larger for light baryons than for strange baryons, and lead to a reduction of in-medium neutrino and antineutrino cross sections. The proton double ratio G*_E/G*_M over G_E/G_M is compared with MAMI and JLab data for 4He, while the axial predictions are compared mainly with model and lattice inputs rather than direct in-medium measurements.

Significance. If the predictions hold, the framework provides a systematic tool for estimating medium-modified baryon electroweak structure and neutrino scattering in dense matter, with clear applications to heavy-ion collisions and compact-star neutrinos. The paper is largely built on the authors' previous calibrated studies, and it inherits the main strengths of that program: explicit parametrizations with documented parameter tables (Tables 2, 3, A2, A6), calibration of the bare valence-quark contributions against lattice QCD data for baryon form factors, and a comparison with the existing 4He polarization-transfer data for the proton double ratio. The resulting quantitative predictions, such as roughly 30% suppression for n->p and 15% for Xi- -> Lambda at Q2 ~ 2 GeV^2 and rho = rho0, are falsifiable in future experiments. However, the significance is limited by the strong dependence of the flavor hierarchy and the high-density behavior on external QMC/bag inputs and on an untested approximation, so the central quantitative claims require additional validation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.3, Eq. (45)] The flavor hierarchy in the central claim rests on the approximation gB*_A/gB_A = gN*_A/gN_A, applied to all octet baryons. This is an assumption, not a derived result, and it directly controls the in-medium pion-baryon couplings in Table 3: at rho = rho0, g*_piXiXi/g_piXiXi = 1.0273 while g*_piNN/g_piNN = 0.8656. If the true in-medium bare axial coupling of the Xi or Lambda is quenched rather than enhanced relative to the nucleon, the predicted ordering of suppression by strangeness content could change. The authors should either test this approximation within the QMC/bag framework used for gN*_A/gN_A or provide an estimate of the associated uncertainty.
  2. [Section 5.2 and Ref. [176]] The extension to densities above rho0 relies on an unpublished saturation model for the in-medium pion decay constant f*_pi, with Ref. [176] listed as 'Manuscript in preparation'. No equation or numerical parametrization of the saturation is given, so the rho > rho0 predictions in Figures 11 and 12 are not reproducible from the present manuscript. The authors should state the model explicitly or clearly label these results as preliminary and remove them from the central quantitative conclusions.
  3. [Section 3.3, Eq. (50)] The axial-vector coupling at Q2 = 0 is effectively imposed by construction: the P-state admixture n_P is fixed for each density by requiring G*_B A(0) = gN*_A, where gN*_A is the external QMC/bag input. Consequently, the often-quoted axial quenching at Q2 = 0 is not an independent prediction of this framework. The genuinely predictive content is the Q2 dependence of G*_A/G_A and the differences among transitions; the paper should state this distinction clearly and avoid presenting the Q2 = 0 quenching as a new result.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 1, first paragraph] There is a duplicated word in 'other other baryons'; it should read 'other baryons'.
  2. [Section 3, paragraph before Section 3.1] The word 'regraded' should be 'regarded' in the sentence about quark masses and dynamical chiral symmetry breaking.
  3. [Section 4.1.2, Figure 4 discussion] The text refers to 'The results for the Sigma- (right side)' but the right panel of Figure 4 shows Xi-; the caption should clarify which baryon is in each panel and the text should use the correct symbol.
  4. [Table 4, fifth row] The nucleus '97Au' should presumably be '197Au'.
  5. [Equation (45), second line] The denominator in the second ratio appears as gN_N in the text; this should be gN_A to be consistent with the notation gA = gN_A defined below the equation.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

In-medium axial suppression is partly imposed by construction: nP is calibrated to the bag/QMC g*A, and Eq. (45) assigns the same in-medium axial-vector ratio to all octet baryons, so the flavor hierarchy is substantially an input assumption.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.3, Eq. (50) and Section 4.2.1]
    "The values of nP are calculated in Refs. [5,44] nP =−0.507 for ρ = 0, nP =−0.536 for ρ = 0.5ρ0, nP =−0.560 for ρ = ρ0. (50) For each density, the value of nP is determined imposing that GB∗A(0) = gN∗A for consistency, with the QMC model used in the calculation of in-medium masses and coupling constants [5]."

    nP is the free parameter that controls the bare axial-vector form factor; fixing it by requiring GB∗A(0) = gN∗A means the in-medium axial charge at Q2 = 0 is an input, not an output. The meson-cloud term is then scaled by (g∗πNN/gπNN)^2, which is itself constructed from the same gN∗A through the Goldberger–Treiman relation (45). Section 4.2.1 then reports the QMC input as the result: 'The QMC model predicts... quenching of 5%... and 10%... Similar proportions are obtained in our final results.' The claimed low-Q2 suppression of GA, and the consequent reduction of neutrino cross sections, is therefore essentially the bag/QMC input repackaged through the model rather than an independent prediction.

  2. self definitional [Section 3.3, Eq. (45) and Table 3; abstract and Section 4.2.1]
    "g∗πBB/gπBB = (fπ/f∗π)(gN∗A/gN_N)(M∗B/MB), (45) ... In the second equation, we approximate gB∗A /gB_A≃ gN∗A /gN_A."

    The flavor hierarchy claimed in the abstract and Section 4.2.1 is constructed by setting every octet baryon's in-medium bare axial-vector coupling ratio equal to the nucleon's. Table 3 then gives g∗πΞΞ/gπΞΞ = 1.0273 at ρ0, which is determined solely by (fπ/f∗π)(M∗Ξ/MΞ) once the nucleon ratio is inserted; no flavor-dependent axial response of the Ξ is computed. The statement that strange baryons are less modified is therefore an input assumption about the equality of axial ratios, not a derived consequence. The high-Q2 suppression values quoted in Section 4.2.1 are valence-dominated, so the circularity is partial rather than total.

full rationale

This paper is a model calculation/review rather than a first-principles derivation, and much of the formalism is openly calibrated to free-space and lattice-QCD data. The electromagnetic double ratios are checked against JLab and MAMI data, so that part has independent support and is not circular. The genuinely circular elements are in the axial sector. First, nP is fixed per density by enforcing GB∗A(0) = gN∗A, so the in-medium axial-vector coupling at Q2 = 0 is an imposed bag/QMC input; the subsequent low-Q2 suppression of GA and of neutrino/antineutrino cross sections is thus a repackaging of that input. Second, Eq. (45) approximates gB∗A/gB_A ≃ gN∗A/gN_A for all octet baryons, which directly builds in the light-versus-heavy flavor ordering at low Q2; the model does not compute a baryon-dependent axial response for the hyperons. The paper also relies on the same-author preprint Ref. [34] for the central ratio gN∗A/gN_A and on unpublished same-author work Ref. [176] for densities above ρ0; these are missing independent support, though the beta-decay quenching literature provides some external motivation. Because the finite-Q2 shapes, the pseudoscalar GP predictions, and the electromagnetic sector retain independent content, the central claim is only partially circular, not wholly so.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on a large set of free parameters fitted to lattice QCD and free-space data, plus QMC inputs for in-medium masses and couplings. The most consequential modeling choices are the Goldberger-Treiman approximation in Eq. (45), the n_P normalization that forces G_B*A(0) = g_N*A, and the unpublished f*pi saturation model for high densities. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (8)
  • Radial wave function momentum ranges beta_l (l = 1..4) = 0.0532, 0.809, 0.603, 0.381
    Determined by fits to lattice QCD baryon electromagnetic form factors at high pion mass (Ref. [109]); shapes all octet baryon form factors.
  • Quark anomalous magnetic moments kappa_u, kappa_d, kappa_s = 1.711, 1.987, 1.462
    Fitted to nucleon, octet and decuplet electromagnetic data (Refs. [17,53]); controls magnetic form factors at Q2 = 0.
  • Vector meson dominance parameters lambda_q, c_plus, c_minus, c_0, d_plus, d_minus, d_0 = 1.21, 4.160, 1.160, 4.427, -0.686, -0.686, -1.860
    Fitted to nucleon and decuplet form factors (Refs. [51,53]); set the Q2 dependence of the quark currents.
  • P-state admixture n_P = -0.507 at rho = 0, -0.536 at 0.5 rho0, -0.560 at rho0
    Free at rho = 0 (fit to lattice axial data, Ref. [110]); in medium chosen to enforce G_B*A(0) = g_N*A, so the axial result at Q2 = 0 is calibrated to the QMC input.
  • Quark axial induced pseudoscalar parameters alpha, beta = -3.9011, 0.3297
    Fitted to lattice QCD nucleon axial form factors (Ref. [110]); enters the induced pseudoscalar form factor.
  • Meson cloud electromagnetic parameters b1(0), b2(0), c2(0), d2(0), d'_1, Lambda1^2, Lambda2^2 = 0.0510, 0.216, 0.00286, 0.0821, -0.148, 0.618, 1.281
    Adjusted to proton and neutron form factor data, nucleon radii and octet magnetic moments (Section 3.2.1).
  • Axial meson cloud parameters G_MC0_AN, Lambda, F'(0), D'(0), b1(0) = 0.6059, 1.05 GeV, 0.1775, 0.4284, 0.121
    Fixed by nucleon GA data, lattice data and octet axial couplings (Section 3.2.2); sets the meson cloud strength for all transitions.
  • f*pi saturation scale for densities above rho0 = Saturates near 3 rho0 (Ref. [176], unpublished)
    Ad hoc modification of the chiral perturbation theory f*pi expression used for rho greater than rho0 (Section 5.2); no published derivation.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Symmetric nuclear matter is infinite and uniform, described by mean-field one-body currents with small final-state interactions.
    Invoked in Sections 1 and 3.3 and used for all in-medium calculations; neglects two-body currents and finite-size or nuclear-structure effects.
  • domain assumption Baryons are quark-diquark systems with phenomenological radial wave functions, and the electroweak probe couples to one quark in impulse approximation.
    This is the foundational structure of the covariant spectator quark model, Section 3.1, Eq. (15).
  • domain assumption Electroweak form factors separate into valence quark and meson cloud contributions with no double counting.
    Used throughout Section 3.2; the separation is model-dependent but the authors argue parameters are fixed by lattice data at high pion mass.
  • domain assumption High-pion-mass lattice QCD data isolate the valence quark degrees of freedom.
    Used to calibrate the bare quark parameters (Sections 3.1.4 and 3.2).
  • ad hoc to paper Goldberger-Treiman relation with gB*A/gB_A approximated by gN*A/gN_A holds for all octet baryons.
    Eq. (45) in Section 3.3; this approximation propagates the nucleon axial quenching to all hyperon couplings and drives the predicted flavor dependence.
  • domain assumption QMC model values for in-medium masses and couplings (Tables 2 and 3) are correct.
    Inputs from Refs. [34,154,155,157]; all in-medium predictions inherit these values.
  • ad hoc to paper For densities above rho0, f*pi saturates near 3 rho0 according to the unpublished model of Ref. [176].
    The high-density results in Section 5.2 depend on this not-yet-published input.
  • domain assumption Meson cloud axial contribution scales as (g*piNN/gpiNN)^2 with unchanged cutoff Lambda.
    Eq. (47) in Section 3.3, presented as a first approximation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electroweak form factors of baryons in dense nuclear matter." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JZRNHI2X

@misc{pith2026250415660,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electroweak form factors of baryons in dense nuclear matter},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JZRNHI2X}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.15660}
}
abstract

There is evidence that the properties of hadrons are modified in a nuclear medium. Information about the medium modifications of the internal structure of hadrons is fundamental for the study of dense nuclear matter and high-energy processes, including heavy-ion and nucleus--nucleus collisions. At the moment, however, empirical information about medium modifications of hadrons is limited; therefore, theoretical studies are essential for progress in the field. In the present work, we review theoretical studies of the electromagnetic and axial form factors of octet baryons in symmetric nuclear matter. The calculations are based on a model that takes into account the degrees of freedom revealed in experimental studies of low and intermediate square transfer momentum $q^2=-Q^2$: valence quarks and meson cloud excitations of baryon cores. The formalism combines a covariant constituent quark model, developed for a free space (vacuum) with the quark--meson coupling model for extension to the nuclear medium. We conclude that the nuclear medium modifies the baryon properties differently according to the flavor content of the baryons and the medium density. The effects of the medium increase with density and are stronger (quenched or enhanced) for light baryons than for heavy baryons. In particular, the in-medium neutrino--nucleon and antineutrino--nucleon cross-sections are reduced compared to the values in free space. The proposed formalism can be extended to densities above the normal nuclear density and applied to neutrino--hyperon and antineutrino--hyperon scattering in dense nuclear matter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.15660 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Electroweak interactions with a baryon B within the one-meson-loop level. (a) Interaction with meson. (b) Interaction with intermediate baryons. B ′ differs from B in the inelastic transition (weak axial transitions). The states B1 and B2 represent generic intermediate states. The masses of the octet baryons are not calculated within the quark model formalism. In the calculations in the free space, we consider the a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Electric and magnetic form factor ratios for the nucleon: proton, neutron, Σ +, and Ξ −. The magnetic form factors are in natural units ( e 2MB and e 2M∗ B ). The horizontal line is included to represent the ratio in free space. In the case of the neutron, we display G ∗ E instead of the ratio G ∗ E /GE for a cleaner comparison. It is worth mentioning that, when we convert G ∗ M/GM for the nucleon to units of nuclea… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Proton and neutron double ratios in units of nuclear magneton. CN = M∗ N MN . The proton data are from MAMI [9] (black) and JLab [10] (blue). 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Q 2 (GeV2 ) 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 CΣ (G E*/G M*)/(G E/G M ) ρ = 0.5 ρ0 ρ = 1.0 ρ0 Σ + 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Q 2 (GeV2 ) 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 CΞ (G E*/G M*)/(G E/G M ) ρ = 0.5 ρ0 ρ = 1.0 ρ0 Ξ − [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Σ + and Ξ − double ratios in units of nuclear magneton. CΣ = M∗ Σ MΣ and CΞ = M∗ Ξ MΞ . The predictions for the neutron contrast with the model calculations for the proton (quenched effect). According to the results from left side of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: n → p and Ξ − → Ξ 0 axial form factors in nuclear medium (|∆I| = 1 transitions). We use −GA for the negative functions for an easy comparison of magnitudes. The horizontal line (G ∗ A /GA ≡ 1) is included to represent the ratio in free space [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/f…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Λ → p and Ξ − → Λ axial-vector form factors in nuclear medium (|∆S| = 1 transitions). We use −GA for the negative functions for an easy comparison of magnitudes. The horizontal line (G ∗ A /GA ≡ 1) is included to represent the ratio in free space. The calculations pres…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: GP form factors for the n → p and Ξ − → Ξ 0 transitions (|∆I| = 1) in nuclear medium. For an easy comparison of magnitudes, we use −GP for the negative functions. The horizontal line (G ∗ P /GP ≡ 1) is included to represent the ratio in free space. 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: GP form factors for the Λ → p and Ξ − → Λ transitions (|∆S| = 1) in nuclear medium. For an easy comparison of magnitudes, we use −GP for the negative functions. The horizontal line (G ∗ P /GP ≡ 1) is included to represent the ratio in free space. In the case of the |∆S…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: GE, GM, and GA form factors for the nucleon B = p, n bound to a nucleus. Our model calculations for n and p form factors for ρ = 0.5ρ0 and ρ = ρ0 have been used in the calculation of the νp → νp, ν¯p → ν¯p, ν¯n → ν¯n and ν¯n → ν¯n single￾differential cross-sections, as…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: GE, GM, and GA form factors for the nucleon bound to a nucleus (B = n, p). As for the hyperons ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: GE, GM, and GA form factors for Σ + and Ξ − bound to a nucleus. The conclusion of this section is that the neutrino/antineutrino–nucleon cross-sections are in general reduced in the nuclear medium. Under study is the impact of the hyperon form factors on the neutrino/…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

177 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [176]

    Manuscript in preparation; to be submitted

    Ramalho, G.; Tsushima, K.; Cheoun, M.K. Manuscript in preparation; to be submitted

    work page

  2. [1]

    Scaling effective Lagrangians in a dense medium

    Brown, G.E.; Rho, M. Scaling effective Lagrangians in a dense medium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1991, 66, 2720

    1991

  3. [2]

    Medium Modifications of Hadron Properties and Partonic Processes.J

    Brooks, W.K.; Strauch, S.; Tsushima, K. Medium Modifications of Hadron Properties and Partonic Processes.J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2011, 299, 012011

    2011

  4. [3]

    Nucleon and hadron structure changes in the nuclear medium and impact on observables

    Saito, K.; Tsushima, K.; Thomas, A.W. Nucleon and hadron structure changes in the nuclear medium and impact on observables. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2007, 58, 1–167

    2007

  5. [4]

    Equation of State for Neutron Stars With Hyperons and Quarks in the Relativistic Hartree–fock Approximation

    Miyatsu, T.; Cheoun, M.K.; Saito, K. Equation of State for Neutron Stars With Hyperons and Quarks in the Relativistic Hartree–fock Approximation. Astrophys. J. 2015, 813, 135

    2015

  6. [5]

    Weak interaction axial form factors of the octet baryons in nuclear medium

    Ramalho, G.; Tsushima, K.; Cheoun, M.K. Weak interaction axial form factors of the octet baryons in nuclear medium. Phys. Rev. D 2025, 111, 013002

    2025

  7. [6]

    The ratio of the nucleon structure functions F2n for iron and deuterium

    Aubert, J.J.; Bassompierre, G.; Becks, K.H.; Best, C.; Bohm, E.; de Bouard, X.; Brasse, F.W.; Broll, C.; Brown, S.; Carr, J.; et al. The ratio of the nucleon structure functions F2n for iron and deuterium. Phys. Lett. B 1983, 123, 275

    1983

  8. [7]

    Measurements of the a-Dependence of Deep Inelastic electron Scattering from Nuclei

    Arnold, R.G.; Bosted, P .E.; Chang, C.C.; Gomez, J.; Katramatou, A.T.; Petratos, G.; Rahbar, A.A.; Rock, S.; Sill, A.F.; Szalata, Z.M.; et al. Measurements of the a-Dependence of Deep Inelastic electron Scattering from Nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1984, 52, 727. Symmetry 2025, 1, 0 41 of 46

    1984

Show all 177 references
  1. [8]

    Nucleon-Nucleon Correlations, Short-lived Excitations, and the Quarks Within

    Hen, O.; Miller, G.A.; Piasetzky, E.; Weinstein, L.B. Nucleon-Nucleon Correlations, Short-lived Excitations, and the Quarks Within. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2017, 89, 045002

    2017

  2. [9]

    Polarization transfer in the 4He(⃗e, e′⃗p)3H reaction

    Dieterich, S.; Bartsch, P .; Baumann, D.; Bermuth, J.; Bohinc, K.; Bohm, R.; Bosnar, D.; Derber, S.; Ding, M.; Distler, M.; et al. Polarization transfer in the 4He(⃗e, e′⃗p)3H reaction. Phys. Lett. 2001, B500, 47

    2001

  3. [10]

    Polarization transfer in the 4He(⃗e, e′⃗p)3H reaction up to Q2 = 2.6 (GeV/c)2

    Strauch, S.; Dieterich, S.; Aniol, K.A.; Ann, J.R.; Baker, O.K.; Bertozzi, W.; Boswell, M.; Brash, E.J.; Chai, Z.; Chen, J.P .; et al. Polarization transfer in the 4He(⃗e, e′⃗p)3H reaction up to Q2 = 2.6 (GeV/c)2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 91, 052301

    2003

  4. [11]

    [E93-049 Collaboration]

    Strauch, S. [E93-049 Collaboration]. Medium modification of the proton form-factor. Eur. Phys. J. A 2004, 19, 153

    2004

  5. [12]

    Polarization Transfer in the 4He(e, e′ p)3H at Q2 = 0.8 and 1.3 (GeV/c)2

    Paolone, M.; Malace, S.P .; Strauch, S.; Albayrak, I.; Arrington, J.; Berman, B.L.; Brash, E.J.; Briscoe, B.; et al. Polarization Transfer in the 4He(e, e′ p)3H at Q2 = 0.8 and 1.3 (GeV/c)2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 072001

    2010

  6. [13]

    A precise extraction of the induced polarization in the 4He(e, e′ p)3H reaction

    Malace, S.P .; Paolone, M.; Strauch, S.; Albayrak, I.; Arrington, J.; Berman, B.L.; Brash, E.J.; Briscoe, W.J.; Camsonne, A.; Chen, J.P .; et al. A precise extraction of the induced polarization in the 4He(e, e′ p)3H reaction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106, 052501

    2011

  7. [14]

    Polarization transfer in the 16O(⃗e, e′⃗p)15N reaction

    Malov, S.; Wijesooriya, K.; Baker, F.T.; Bimbot, L.; Brash, E.J.; Chang, C.C.; Finn, J.M.; Fissum, K.G.; Gao, J.; Gilman, R.; et al. Polarization transfer in the 16O(⃗e, e′⃗p)15N reaction. Phys. Rev. C 2000, 62, 057302

    2000

  8. [15]

    Izraeli, D. et al. [A1 Collaboration]. Measurement of polarization-transfer to bound protons in carbon and its virtuality dependence. Phys. Lett. B 2018, 781, 95–98

    2018

  9. [16]

    Kolar, T. et al. [A1 Collaboration]. Measurement of polarization transfer in the quasi-elastic 40Ca(⃗e, e′⃗p) process. Phys. Lett. B 2023, 847, 138309

    2023

  10. [17]

    Octet Baryon Electromagnetic form Factors in Nuclear Medium.J

    Ramalho, G.; Tsushima, K.; Thomas, A.W. Octet Baryon Electromagnetic form Factors in Nuclear Medium.J. Phys. G 2013, 40, 015102

    2013

  11. [18]

    Octet baryon electromagnetic form factor double ratios(G∗ E/G∗ M)/(GE/GM) in a nuclear medium

    Ramalho, G.; de Melo, J.P .B.C.; Tsushima, K. Octet baryon electromagnetic form factor double ratios(G∗ E/G∗ M)/(GE/GM) in a nuclear medium. Phys. Rev. D 2019, 100, 014030

    2019

  12. [19]

    The Role of color neutrality in nuclear physics: Modifications of nucleonic wave functions

    Frank, M.R.; Jennings, B.K.; Miller, G.A. The Role of color neutrality in nuclear physics: Modifications of nucleonic wave functions. Phys. Rev. C 1996, 54, 920

    1996

  13. [20]

    Electromagnetic form-factors of the bound nucleon.Phys

    Lu, D.H.; Tsushima, K.; Thomas, A.W.; Williams, A.G.; Saito, K. Electromagnetic form-factors of the bound nucleon.Phys. Rev. C 1999, 60, 068201

    1999

  14. [21]

    Chiral solitons in nuclei: Electromagnetic form-factors

    Smith, J.R.; Miller, G.A. Chiral solitons in nuclei: Electromagnetic form-factors. Phys. Rev. C 2004, 70, 065205

    2004

  15. [22]

    Neutron Properties in the Medium

    Cloet, I.C.; Miller, G.A.; Piasetzky, E.; Ron, G. Neutron Properties in the Medium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 082301

    2009

  16. [23]

    Study of the in-medium nucleon electromagnetic form factors using a light-front nucleon wave function combined with the quark-meson coupling model

    de Araújo, W.R.B.; de Melo, J.P .B.C.; Tsushima, K. Study of the in-medium nucleon electromagnetic form factors using a light-front nucleon wave function combined with the quark-meson coupling model. Nucl. Phys. A 2018, 970, 325

    2018

  17. [24]

    Light front cloudy bag model: Nucleon electromagnetic form-factors

    Miller, G.A. Light front cloudy bag model: Nucleon electromagnetic form-factors. Phys. Rev. C 2002, 66, 032201

    2002

  18. [25]

    Electromagnetic form-factors of bound nucleons revisited.Eur

    Yakhshiev, U.T.; Meissner, U.G.; Wirzba, A. Electromagnetic form-factors of bound nucleons revisited.Eur. Phys. J. A 2003, 16, 569

    2003

  19. [26]

    In-medium electron-nucleon scattering.Phys

    Lu, D.H.; Thomas, A.W.; Tsushima, K.; Williams, A.G.; Saito, K. In-medium electron-nucleon scattering.Phys. Lett. B 1998, 417, 217

    1998

  20. [27]

    The Neutron charge form-factor in helium-3.Phys

    Lu, D.H.; Tsushima, K.; Thomas, A.W.; Williams, A.G.; Saito, K. The Neutron charge form-factor in helium-3.Phys. Lett. B 1998, 441, 27

    1998

  21. [28]

    Effect of the bound nucleon form-factors on charged current neutrino nucleus scattering

    Tsushima, K.; Kim, H.; Saito, K. Effect of the bound nucleon form-factors on charged current neutrino nucleus scattering. Phys. Rev. C 2004, 70, 038501

    2004

  22. [29]

    Electromagnetic form-factors of the nucleon in the chiral quark soliton model

    Christov, C.V .; Gorski, A.Z.; Goeke, K.; Pobylitsa, P .V . Electromagnetic form-factors of the nucleon in the chiral quark soliton model. Nucl. Phys. A 1995, 592, 513

    1995

  23. [30]

    In Neutron Properties in the Nuclear Medium Studied by Polarization Measurements ; Gilman, R., Higinbotham, D.W., Lichtenstadt, J., Ron, G., Strauch, S

    Letter of Intent to JLab PAC 35. In Neutron Properties in the Nuclear Medium Studied by Polarization Measurements ; Gilman, R., Higinbotham, D.W., Lichtenstadt, J., Ron, G., Strauch, S. https://hallaweb.jlab.org/collab/PAC/PAC35/LOI-10-007-Neutron- Modification.pdf

  24. [31]

    Experimental and Theoretical Gamow-Teller Beta-Decay Observables for the sd-Shell Nuclei

    Brown, B.A.; Wildenthal, B.H. Experimental and Theoretical Gamow-Teller Beta-Decay Observables for the sd-Shell Nuclei. Atom. Data Nucl. Data T abl. 1985, 33, 347

    1985

  25. [32]

    Discrepancy between experimental and theoretical β-decay rates resolved from first principles

    Gysbers, P .; Hagen, G.; Holt, J.D.; Jansen, G.R.; Morris, T.D.; Navrátil, P .; Papenbrock, T.; Quaglioni, S.; Schwenk, A.; Stroberg, S.R.; et al. Discrepancy between experimental and theoretical β-decay rates resolved from first principles. Nat. Phys. 2019, 15, 428

    2019

  26. [33]

    Chiral Symmetry And The Bag Model: A New Starting Point For Nuclear Physics

    Thomas, A.W. Chiral Symmetry And The Bag Model: A New Starting Point For Nuclear Physics. Adv. Nucl. Phys. 1984, 13, 1–137

    1984

  27. [34]

    Medium modification of the nucleon axial form-factor.arXiv 2001, arXiv:nucl-th/0112001

    Lu, D.H.; Thomas, A.W.; Tsushima, K. Medium modification of the nucleon axial form-factor.arXiv 2001, arXiv:nucl-th/0112001

    2001 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Baryons as non-topological chiral solitons

    Christov, C.V .; Blotz, A.; Kim, H.-C.; Pobylitsa, P .; Watabe, T.; Meissner, T.; Arriola, E.R.; Goeke, K. Baryons as non-topological chiral solitons. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 1996, 37, 91–191

    1996

  29. [36]

    Density dependence of meson nucleon vertices in nuclear matter

    Rakhimov, A.M.; Khanna, F.C.; Yakhshiev, U.T.; Musakhanov, M.M. Density dependence of meson nucleon vertices in nuclear matter. Nucl. Phys. A 1998, 643, 383

    1998

  30. [37]

    Quantum corrections to baryon properties in chiral soliton models

    Meier, F.; Walliser, H. Quantum corrections to baryon properties in chiral soliton models. Phys. Rept. 1997, 289, 383

    1997

  31. [38]

    Nucleons as Skyrme Solitons with Vector Mesons: Electromagnetic and Axial Properties

    Meissner, U.G.; Kaiser, N.; Weise, W. Nucleons as Skyrme Solitons with Vector Mesons: Electromagnetic and Axial Properties. Nucl. Phys. A 1987, 466, 685. Symmetry 2025, 1, 0 42 of 46

    1987

  32. [39]

    Chiral Symmetry and Medium Modifications of Nucleon Properties

    Meissner, U.G. Chiral Symmetry and Medium Modifications of Nucleon Properties. Phys. Lett. B 1989, 220, 1

    1989

  33. [40]

    Electromagnetic transition form factors of baryon resonances

    Ramalho, G.; Peña, M.T. Electromagnetic transition form factors of baryon resonances. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2024, 136, 104097

    2024

  34. [41]

    Studies of Nucleon Resonance Structure in Exclusive Meson Electroproduction

    Aznauryan, I.G.; Bashir, A.; Braun, V .; Brodsky, S.J.; Burkert, V .D.; Chang, L.; Chen, C.h.; El-Bennich, B.; Cloet, I.C.; Cole, P .L.; et al. Studies of Nucleon Resonance Structure in Exclusive Meson Electroproduction. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 2013, 22, 1330015

    2013

  35. [42]

    Electroexcitation of nucleon resonances

    Aznauryan, I.G.; Burkert, V .D. Electroexcitation of nucleon resonances. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2012, 67, 1

    2012

  36. [43]

    Nucleon resonances in Compton scattering

    Eichmann, G.; Ramalho, G. Nucleon resonances in Compton scattering. Phys. Rev. D 2018, 98, 093007

    2018

  37. [44]

    Axial form factors of the octet baryons in a covariant quark model

    Ramalho, G.; Tsushima, K. Axial form factors of the octet baryons in a covariant quark model. Phys. Rev. D 2016, 94, 014001

    2016

  38. [45]

    Hyperon Beta Decays

    Gaillard, J.M.; Sauvage, G. Hyperon Beta Decays. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 1984, 34, 351

    1984

  39. [46]

    Axial structure of the nucleon: Topical Review

    Bernard, V .; Elouadrhiri, L.; Meissner, U.G. Axial structure of the nucleon: Topical Review. J. Phys. G 2002, 28, R1

    2002

  40. [47]

    Induced pseudoscalar coupling of the proton weak interaction

    Gorringe, T.; Fearing, H.W. Induced pseudoscalar coupling of the proton weak interaction. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2004, 76, 31

    2004

  41. [48]

    Nucleon Form Factors of the Isovector Axial-Vector Current: Situation of Experiments and Theory

    Schindler, M.R.; Scherer, S. Nucleon Form Factors of the Isovector Axial-Vector Current: Situation of Experiments and Theory. Eur. Phys. J. A 2007, 32, 429

    2007

  42. [49]

    N∗ Form Factors based on a Covariant Quark Model

    Ramalho, G. N∗ Form Factors based on a Covariant Quark Model. Few Body Syst. 2018, 59, 92

    2018

  43. [50]

    D-state effects in the electromagnetic N∆ transition

    Ramalho, G.; Peña, M.T.; Gross, F. D-state effects in the electromagnetic N∆ transition. Phys. Rev. D 2008, 78, 114017

    2008

  44. [51]

    A Pure S-wave covariant model for the nucleon

    Gross, F.; Ramalho, G.; Peña, M.T. A Pure S-wave covariant model for the nucleon. Phys. Rev. C 2008, 77, 015202

    2008

  45. [52]

    Covariant nucleon wave function withS, D, and P-state components

    Gross, F.; Ramalho, G.; Peña, M.T. Covariant nucleon wave function withS, D, and P-state components. Phys. Rev. D 2012, 85, 093005

    2012

  46. [53]

    A Relativistic quark model for theΩ− electromagnetic form factors

    Ramalho, G.; Tsushima, K.; Gross, F. A Relativistic quark model for theΩ− electromagnetic form factors. Phys. Rev. D 2009, 80, 033004

    2009

  47. [54]

    Octet baryon electromagnetic form factors in a relativistic quark model

    Ramalho, G.; Tsushima, K. Octet baryon electromagnetic form factors in a relativistic quark model. Phys. Rev. D 2011, 84, 054014

    2011

  48. [55]

    Using baryon octet magnetic moments and masses to fix the pion cloud contribution

    Gross, F.; Ramalho, G.; Tsushima, K. Using baryon octet magnetic moments and masses to fix the pion cloud contribution. Phys. Lett. B 2010, 690, 183

    2010

  49. [56]

    Octet to decuplet electromagnetic transition in a relativistic quark model

    Ramalho, G.; Tsushima, K. Octet to decuplet electromagnetic transition in a relativistic quark model. Phys. Rev. D 2013, 87, 093011

    2013

  50. [57]

    Electromagnetic form factors of the Delta in a S-wave approach

    Ramalho, G.; Peña, M.T. Electromagnetic form factors of the Delta in a S-wave approach. J. Phys. G 2009, 36, 085004

    2009

  51. [58]

    Electromagnetic form factors of the Delta with D-waves

    Ramalho, G.; Peña, M.T.; Gross, F. Electromagnetic form factors of the Delta with D-waves. Phys. Rev. D 2010, 81, 113011

    2010

  52. [59]

    Electric quadrupole and magnetic octupole moments of the Delta

    Ramalho, G.; Peña, M.T.; Gross, F. Electric quadrupole and magnetic octupole moments of the Delta. Phys. Lett. B 2009, 678, 355

    2009

  53. [60]

    Extracting the Ω− electric quadrupole moment from lattice QCD data

    Ramalho, G.; Peña, M.T. Extracting the Ω− electric quadrupole moment from lattice QCD data. Phys. Rev. D 2011, 83, 054011

    2011

  54. [61]

    The shape of the ∆ baryon in a covariant spectator quark model

    Ramalho, G.; Peña, M.T.; Stadler, A. The shape of the ∆ baryon in a covariant spectator quark model. Phys. Rev. D 2012, 86, 093022

    2012

  55. [62]

    Covariant spectator quark model description of the γ∗Λ→ Σ0 transition

    Ramalho, G.; Tsushima, K. Covariant spectator quark model description of the γ∗Λ→ Σ0 transition. Phys. Rev. D 2012, 86, 114030

    2012

  56. [63]

    What is the role of the meson cloud in the Σ∗0→ γΛ and Σ∗→ γΣ decays? Phys

    Ramalho, G.; Tsushima, K. What is the role of the meson cloud in the Σ∗0→ γΛ and Σ∗→ γΣ decays? Phys. Rev. D 2013, 88, 053002

    2013

  57. [64]

    Hyperon electromagnetic timelike elastic form factors at largeq2

    Ramalho, G.; Peña, M.T.; Tsushima, K. Hyperon electromagnetic timelike elastic form factors at largeq2. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 101, 014014

    2020

  58. [65]

    Electromagnetic form factors of the Ω− baryon in the spacelike and timelike regions

    Ramalho, G. Electromagnetic form factors of the Ω− baryon in the spacelike and timelike regions. Phys. Rev. D 2021, 103, 074018

    2021

  59. [66]

    Electromagnetic|GE/GM| ratios of hyperons at large timelike q2

    Ramalho, G.; Peña, M.T.; Tsushima, K.; Cheoun, M.K. Electromagnetic|GE/GM| ratios of hyperons at large timelike q2. Phys. Lett. B 2024, 858, 139060

    2024

  60. [67]

    Ovariant model for Dalitz decays of decuplet baryons to octet baryons

    Ramalho, G. Ovariant model for Dalitz decays of decuplet baryons to octet baryons. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 102, 054016

    2020

  61. [68]

    Meson cloud contributions to the Dalitz decays of decuplet to octet baryons

    Ramalho, G.; Tsushima, K. Meson cloud contributions to the Dalitz decays of decuplet to octet baryons. Phys. Rev. D 2023, 108, 074019

    2023

  62. [69]

    Selfconsistent description of finite nuclei based on a relativistic quark model

    Saito, K.; Tsushima, K.; Thomas, A.W. Selfconsistent description of finite nuclei based on a relativistic quark model. Nucl. Phys. A 1996, 609, 339

    1996

  63. [70]

    On the role of the pion cloud in nucleon electromagnetic form-factors.Nucl

    Lu, D.H.; Yang, S.N.; Thomas, A.W. On the role of the pion cloud in nucleon electromagnetic form-factors.Nucl. Phys. A 2001, 684, 296

    2001

  64. [71]

    Magnetic Moments Of The Nucleon Octet Calculated In The Cloudy Bag Model

    Theberge, S.; Thomas, A.W. Magnetic Moments Of The Nucleon Octet Calculated In The Cloudy Bag Model. Nucl. Phys. A 1983, 393, 252

    1983

  65. [72]

    Electromagnetic form-factors of the nucleon in an improved quark model

    Lu, D.H.; Thomas, A.W.; Williams, A.G. Electromagnetic form-factors of the nucleon in an improved quark model. Phys. Rev. C 1998, 57, 2628–2637

    1998

  66. [73]

    Weak Interactions Form-factors of the Octet Baryons in the Cloudy Bag Model

    Kubodera, K.; Kohyama, Y.; Oikawa, K.; Kim, C.W. Weak Interactions Form-factors of the Octet Baryons in the Cloudy Bag Model. Nucl. Phys. A 1985, 439, 695

    1985

  67. [74]

    Semileptonic Beta Decay Form-factors and Magnetic Moments of Octet Baryons: Recoil Effects and Center-of-mass Corrections in the Cloudy Bag Model Including Gluonic Effects

    Yamaguchi, T.; Tsushima, K.; Kohyama, Y.; Kubodera, K. Semileptonic Beta Decay Form-factors and Magnetic Moments of Octet Baryons: Recoil Effects and Center-of-mass Corrections in the Cloudy Bag Model Including Gluonic Effects. Nucl. Phys. A 1989, 500, 429. Symmetry 2025, 1, 0...

    1989

  68. [75]

    Weak Interaction Form-factors and Magnetic Moments of Octet Baryons: Chiral Bag Model With Gluonic Effects

    Tsushima, K.; Yamaguchi, T.; Kohyama, Y.; Kubodera, K. Weak Interaction Form-factors and Magnetic Moments of Octet Baryons: Chiral Bag Model With Gluonic Effects. Nucl. Phys. A 1988, 489, 557

    1988

  69. [76]

    Baryons as relativistic three-quark bound states.Prog

    Eichmann, G.; Sanchis-Alepuz, H.; Williams, R.; Alkofer, R.; Fischer, C.S. Baryons as relativistic three-quark bound states.Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2016, 91, 100

    2016

  70. [77]

    Explanation and Prediction of Observables using Continuum Strong QCD

    Cloet, I.C.; Roberts, C.D. Explanation and Prediction of Observables using Continuum Strong QCD. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2014, 77, 1

    2014

  71. [78]

    Dyson-Schwinger equations: A Tool for hadron physics

    Maris, P .; Roberts, C.D. Dyson-Schwinger equations: A Tool for hadron physics. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 2003, 12, 297

    2003

  72. [79]

    The form-factors of the nucleon at small momentum transfer.Nucl

    Bernard, V .; Fearing, H.W.; Hemmert, T.R.; Meissner, U.G. The form-factors of the nucleon at small momentum transfer.Nucl. Phys. A 1998, 635, 121. Erratum in Nucl. Phys. A 1998, 642, 563

    1998

  73. [80]

    On the pion cloud of the nucleon

    Hammer, H.W.; Drechsel, D.; Meissner, U.G. On the pion cloud of the nucleon. Phys. Lett. B 2004, 586, 291

    2004

  74. [81]

    The Pion cloud of the nucleon: Facts and popular fantasies

    Meissner, U.G. The Pion cloud of the nucleon: Facts and popular fantasies. AIP Conf. Proc. 2007, 904, 142

    2007

  75. [82]

    Coupled-channel dynamics in the reactions πN→ πN, ηN, KΛ, KΣ

    Ronchen, D.; Doring, M.; Huang, F.; Haberzettl, H.; Haidenbauer, J.; Hanhart, C.; Krewald, S.; Meissner, U.G.; Nakayama, K. Coupled-channel dynamics in the reactions πN→ πN, ηN, KΛ, KΣ. Eur. Phys. J. A 2013, 49, 44

    2013

  76. [83]

    Electromagnetic excitation of the ∆(1232)-resonance

    Pascalutsa, V .; Vanderhaeghen, M.; Yang, S.N. Electromagnetic excitation of the ∆(1232)-resonance. Phys. Rept. 2007, 437, 125

    2007

  77. [84]

    Nucleon to delta electromagnetic transition form factors in lattice QCD

    Alexandrou, C.; Koutsou, G.; Neff, H.; Negele, J.W.; Schroers, W.; Tsapalis, A. Nucleon to delta electromagnetic transition form factors in lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D 2008, 77, 085012

    2008

  78. [85]

    A Covariant model for the nucleon and the Delta

    Ramalho, G.; Peña, M.T.; Gross, F. A Covariant model for the nucleon and the Delta. Eur. Phys. J. A 2008, 36, 329

    2008

  79. [86]

    Valence quark contribution for the γN→ ∆ quadrupole transition extracted from lattice QCD

    Ramalho, G.; Peña, M.T. Valence quark contribution for the γN→ ∆ quadrupole transition extracted from lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D 2009, 80, 013008

    2009

  80. [87]

    Nucleon and γN→ ∆ lattice form factors in a constituent quark model

    Ramalho, G.; Peña, M.T. Nucleon and γN→ ∆ lattice form factors in a constituent quark model. J. Phys. G 2009, 36, 115011

    2009

  81. [88]

    Parametrizations of the γ∗ N→ ∆(1232) quadrupole form factors and Siegert’s theorem

    Ramalho, G. Parametrizations of the γ∗ N→ ∆(1232) quadrupole form factors and Siegert’s theorem. Phys. Rev. D 2016, 94, 114001

    2016

  82. [89]

    New low-Q2 measurements of the γ∗ N→ ∆(1232) Coulomb quadrupole form factor, pion cloud parametrizations and Siegert’s theorem

    Ramalho, G. New low-Q2 measurements of the γ∗ N→ ∆(1232) Coulomb quadrupole form factor, pion cloud parametrizations and Siegert’s theorem. Eur. Phys. J. A 2018, 54, 75

    2018

  83. [90]

    Valence quark contributions for the γN→ P11(1440) form factors

    Ramalho, G.; Tsushima, K. Valence quark contributions for the γN→ P11(1440) form factors. Phys. Rev. D 2010, 81, 074020

    2010

  84. [91]

    γ∗ N→ N(1710) transition at high momentum transfer

    Ramalho, G.; Tsushima, K. γ∗ N→ N(1710) transition at high momentum transfer. Phys. Rev. D 2014, 89, 073010

    2014

  85. [92]

    Semirelativistic approximation to the γ∗ N→ N(1520) and γ∗ N→ N(1535) transition form factors

    Ramalho, G. Semirelativistic approximation to the γ∗ N→ N(1520) and γ∗ N→ N(1535) transition form factors. Phys. Rev. D 2017, 95, 054008

    2017

  86. [93]

    A covariant model for the γN→ N(1535) transition at high momentum transfer

    Ramalho, G.; Peña, M.T. A covariant model for the γN→ N(1535) transition at high momentum transfer. Phys. Rev. D 2011, 84, 033007

    2011

  87. [94]

    A simple relation between the γN→ N(1535) helicity amplitudes

    Ramalho, G.; Tsushima, K. A simple relation between the γN→ N(1535) helicity amplitudes. Phys. Rev. D 2011, 84, 051301

    2011

  88. [95]

    γ∗ N→ N∗(1520) form factors in the spacelike region

    Ramalho, G.; Peña, M.T. γ∗ N→ N∗(1520) form factors in the spacelike region. Phys. Rev. D 2014, 89, 094016

    2014

  89. [96]

    Using the Single Quark Transition Model to predict nucleon resonance amplitudes

    Ramalho, G. Using the Single Quark Transition Model to predict nucleon resonance amplitudes. Phys. Rev. D 2014, 90, 033010

    2014

  90. [97]

    Valence quark and meson cloud contributions for theγ∗Λ→ Λ∗ and γ∗Σ0→ Λ∗ reactions

    Ramalho, G.; Jido, D.; Tsushima, K. Valence quark and meson cloud contributions for theγ∗Λ→ Λ∗ and γ∗Σ0→ Λ∗ reactions. Phys. Rev. D 2012, 85, 093014

    2012

  91. [98]

    A Model for the ∆(1600) resonance and γN→ ∆(1600) transition

    Ramalho, G.; Tsushima, K. A Model for the ∆(1600) resonance and γN→ ∆(1600) transition. Phys. Rev. D 2010, 82, 073007

    2010

  92. [99]

    Covariant model for the Dalitz decay of the N(1535) resonance

    Ramalho, G.; Peña, M.T. Covariant model for the Dalitz decay of the N(1535) resonance. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 101, 114008

    2020

  93. [100]

    γ∗ N→ N∗(1520) form factors in the timelike regime

    Ramalho, G.; Peña, M.T. γ∗ N→ N∗(1520) form factors in the timelike regime. Phys. Rev. D 2017, 95, 014003

    2017

  94. [101]

    Role of the pion electromagnetic form factor in the∆(1232)→ γ∗ N timelike transition

    Ramalho, G.; Peña, M.T.; Weil, J.; van Hees, H.; Mosel, U. Role of the pion electromagnetic form factor in the∆(1232)→ γ∗ N timelike transition. Phys. Rev. D 2016, 93, 033004

    2016

  95. [102]

    Timelike γ∗ N→ ∆ form factors and Delta Dalitz decay

    Ramalho, G.; Peña, M.T. Timelike γ∗ N→ ∆ form factors and Delta Dalitz decay. Phys. Rev. D 2012, 85, 113014

    2012

  96. [103]

    Spin and angular momentum in the nucleon

    Gross, F.; Ramalho, G.; Peña, M.T. Spin and angular momentum in the nucleon. Phys. Rev. D 2012, 85, 093006

    2012

  97. [104]

    Three-Dimensional Covariant Integral Equations For Low-Energy Systems

    Gross, F. Three-Dimensional Covariant Integral Equations For Low-Energy Systems. Phys. Rev. 1969, 186, 1448

    1969

  98. [105]

    Covariant equations for the three-body bound state

    Stadler, A.; Gross, F.; Frank, M. Covariant equations for the three-body bound state. Phys. Rev. C 1997, 56, 2396

    1997

  99. [106]

    Fixed-axis polarization states: Covariance and comparisons

    Gross, F.; Ramalho, G.; Peña, M.T. Fixed-axis polarization states: Covariance and comparisons. Phys. Rev. C 2008, 77, 035203

    2008

  100. [107]

    Quark-antiquark bound states in the relativistic spectator formalism

    Savkli, C.; Gross, F. Quark-antiquark bound states in the relativistic spectator formalism. Phys. Rev. C 2001, 63, 035208

    2001

  101. [108]

    The Shape of the nucleon

    Gross, F.; Agbakpe, P . The Shape of the nucleon. Phys. Rev. C 2006, 73, 015203

    2006

  102. [109]

    Strange Baryon Electromagnetic Form Factors and SU(3) Flavor Symmetry Breaking

    Lin, H.W.; Orginos, K. Strange Baryon Electromagnetic Form Factors and SU(3) Flavor Symmetry Breaking. Phys. Rev. D 2009, 79, 074507

    2009

  103. [110]

    Alexandrou, C. et al. [ETM Collaboration]. Axial Nucleon form factors from lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D 2011, 83, 045010

    2011

  104. [111]

    Nucleon form factors and moments of generalized parton distributions using Nf = 2 + 1 + 1 twisted mass fermions

    Alexandrou, C.; Constantinou, M.; Dinter, S.; Drach, V .; Jansen, K.; Kallidonis, C.; Koutsou, G. Nucleon form factors and moments of generalized parton distributions using Nf = 2 + 1 + 1 twisted mass fermions. Phys. Rev. D 2013, 88, 014509

    2013

  105. [112]

    Nucleon and pion structure with lattice QCD simulations at physical value of the pion mass

    Abdel-Rehim, A.; Alexandrou, C.; Constantinou, M.; Dimopoulos, P .; Frezzotti, R.; Hadjiyiannakou, K.; Jansen, K.; Kallidonis, C.; Kostrzewa, B.; Koutsou, G.; et al. Nucleon and pion structure with lattice QCD simulations at physical value of the pion mass. Phys. Rev. D 2015, ...

    2015

  106. [113]

    Axial Vector Form Factors from Lattice QCD that Satisfy the PCAC Relation.Phys

    Jang, Y.C.; Gupta, R.; Yoon, B.; Bhattacharya, T. Axial Vector Form Factors from Lattice QCD that Satisfy the PCAC Relation.Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 124, 072002

    2020

  107. [114]

    Isovector axial form factor of the nucleon from lattice QCD

    Djukanovic, D.; von Hippel, G.; Koponen, J.; Meyer, H.B.; Ottnad, K.; Schulz, T.; Wittig, H. Isovector axial form factor of the nucleon from lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 106, 074503

    2022

  108. [115]

    Octet baryon isovector charges from Nf=2+1 lattice QCD

    Bali, G.S.; Collins, S.; Heybrock, S.; Löffler, M.; Rödl, R.; Söldner, W.; Weishäupl, S. Octet baryon isovector charges from Nf=2+1 lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D 2023, 108, 034512

    2023

  109. [116]

    A per-cent-level determination of the nucleon axial coupling from quantum chromodynamics

    Chang, C.C.; Nicholson, A.N.; Rinaldi, E.; Berkowitz, E.; Garron, N.; Brantley, D.A.; Monge-Camacho, H.; Monahan, C.J.; Bouchard, C.; Clark, M.A.; et al. A per-cent-level determination of the nucleon axial coupling from quantum chromodynamics. Nature 2018, 558, 91

    2018

  110. [117]

    Status of Lattice QCD Determination of Nucleon Form Factors and their Relevance for the Few-GeV Neutrino Program

    Meyer, A.S.; Walker-Loud, A.; Wilkinson, C. Status of Lattice QCD Determination of Nucleon Form Factors and their Relevance for the Few-GeV Neutrino Program. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2022, 72, 205

    2022

  111. [118]

    Holographic estimate of the meson cloud contribution to nucleon axial form factor

    Ramalho, G. Holographic estimate of the meson cloud contribution to nucleon axial form factor. Phys. Rev. D 2018, 97, 073002

    2018

  112. [119]

    Chiral perturbation theory analysis of the baryon magnetic moments.Phys

    Jenkins, E.E.; Luke, M.E.; Manohar, A.V .; Savage, M.J. Chiral perturbation theory analysis of the baryon magnetic moments.Phys. Lett. B 1993, 302, 482

    1993

  113. [120]

    Baryon magnetic moments in chiral perturbation theory

    Meissner, U.G.; Steininger, S. Baryon magnetic moments in chiral perturbation theory. Nucl. Phys. B 1997, 499, 349

    1997

  114. [121]

    Baryon form-factors

    Kubis, B.; Hemmert, T.R.; Meissner, U.G. Baryon form-factors. Phys. Lett. B 1999, 456, 240

    1999

  115. [122]

    Phenomenological quark model for baryon magnetic moments and beta decay ratios (GA/GV )

    Franklin, J. Phenomenological quark model for baryon magnetic moments and beta decay ratios (GA/GV ). Phys. Rev. D 2002, 66, 033010

    2002

  116. [123]

    Electromagnetic form factors of the baryon octet in the perturbative chiral quark modeluark model

    Cheedket, S.; Lyubovitskij, V .E.; Gutsche, T.; Faessler, A.; Pumsa-ard, K.; Yan, Y. Electromagnetic form factors of the baryon octet in the perturbative chiral quark modeluark model. Eur. Phys. J. A 2004, 20, 317

    2004

  117. [124]

    Precise determination of the strangeness magnetic moment of the nucleon

    Leinweber, D.B.; Boinepalli, S.; Cloet, I.C.; Thomas, A.W.; Williams, A.G.; Young, R.D.; Zanotti, J.M.; Zhang, J.B. Precise determination of the strangeness magnetic moment of the nucleon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94, 212001

    2005

  118. [125]

    Precision electromagnetic structure of octet baryons in the chiral regime

    Boinepalli, S.; Leinweber, D.B.; Williams, A.G.; Zanotti, J.M.; Zhang, J.B. Precision electromagnetic structure of octet baryons in the chiral regime. Phys. Rev. D 2006, 74, 093005

    2006

  119. [126]

    Chiral extrapolation of octet-baryon charge radii.Phys

    Wang, P .; Leinweber, D.B.; Thomas, A.W.; Young, R.D. Chiral extrapolation of octet-baryon charge radii.Phys. Rev. D 2009, 79, 094001

    2009

  120. [127]

    Chiral dynamics in nucleons and nuclei

    Bernard, V .; Kaiser, N.; Meissner, U.G. Chiral dynamics in nucleons and nuclei. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 1995, 4, 193

    1995

  121. [128]

    Nucleon Electromagnetic Form Factors.Prog

    Perdrisat, C.F.; Punjabi, V .; Vanderhaeghen, M. Nucleon Electromagnetic Form Factors.Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2007, 59, 694

    2007

  122. [129]

    GEp /GMp ratio by polarization transfer in ⃗ep→ e⃗p

    Jones, M.K.; Aniol, K.A.; Baker, F.T.; Berthot, J.; Bertin, P .Y.; Bertozzi, W.; Besson, A.; Bimbot, L.; Boeglin, W.U.; Brash, E.J.; et al. GEp /GMp ratio by polarization transfer in ⃗ep→ e⃗p. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 84, 1398–1402

    2000

  123. [130]

    Measurement of GEp /GMp in ⃗ep→ e⃗p to Q2 = 5.6 GeV2

    Gayou, O.; Benmokhtar, F.; Bertozzi, W.; Bimbot, L.; Brash, E.J.; Calarco, J.R.; Cavata, C.; Chai, Z.; Chang, C.C.; Chang, T.; et al. Measurement of GEp /GMp in ⃗ep→ e⃗p to Q2 = 5.6 GeV2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 88, 092301

    2002

  124. [131]

    and Ahmidouch, A.; et al

    Puckett, A.J.R.; Brash, E.J.; Jones, M.K.; Luo, W.; Meziane, M.; Pentchev, L.; Perdrisat, C.F.; Punjabi, V .; Wesselmann, F.R. and Ahmidouch, A.; et al. Recoil Polarization Measurements of the Proton Electromagnetic Form Factor Ratio to Q2 = 8.5 GeV2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 10...

    2010

  125. [132]

    High Precision Measurement of the Proton Elastic Form Factor Ratio µpGE/GM at low Q2

    Zhan, X.; Allada, K.; Armstrong, D.S.; Arrington, J.; Bertozzi, W.; Boeglin, W.; Chen, J.-P .; Chirapatpimol, K.; Choi, S.; Chudakov, E.; et al. High Precision Measurement of the Proton Elastic Form Factor Ratio µpGE/GM at low Q2. Phys. Lett. B 2011, 705, 59

    2011

  126. [133]

    Global analysis of proton elastic form factor data with two-photon exchange corrections

    Arrington, J.; Melnitchouk, W.; Tjon, J.A. Global analysis of proton elastic form factor data with two-photon exchange corrections. Phys. Rev. C 2007, 76, 035205

    2007

  127. [134]

    Measurement of the neutron electric form factor GE,n in the quasifree 2H(⃗e, e′⃗p)p reaction

    Ostrick, M.; Herberg, C.; Andresen, H.G.; Annand, J.R.M.; Aulenbacher, K.; Becker, J.; Drescher, P .; Eyl, D.; Frey, A.; Grabmayr, P .; et al. Measurement of the neutron electric form factor GE,n in the quasifree 2H(⃗e, e′⃗p)p reaction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 83, 276

    1999

  128. [135]

    Determination of the neutron electric form factor in the D(e, e′n)p reaction and the influence of nuclear binding

    Herberg, C.; Ostrick, M.; Andresen, H.G.; Annand, J.R.M.; Aulenbacher, K.; Becker, J.; Drescher, P .; Eyl, D.; Frey, A.; Grabmayr, P .; et al. Determination of the neutron electric form factor in the D(e, e′n)p reaction and the influence of nuclear binding. Eur. Phys. J. A 199...

    1999

  129. [136]

    Measurement of the Electric Form Factor of the Neutron at Q2 = 0.3–0.8 (GeV/c)2

    Glazier, D.I.; Seimetz, M.; Annand, J.R.M.; Arenhövel, H.; Antelo, M.A.; Ayerbe, C.; Bartsch, P .; Baumann, D.; Bermuth, J.; Böhm, R.; et al. Measurement of the Electric Form Factor of the Neutron at Q2 = 0.3–0.8 (GeV/c)2. Eur. Phys. J. A 2005, 24, 101

    2005

  130. [137]

    The charge form factor of the neutron from the reaction 2H(⃗e, e′n)p

    Passchier, I.; Alarcon, R.; Bauer, T.S.; Boersma, D.; Brand, J.F.J.v.; Buuren, L.D.v.; Bulten, H.J.; Ferro-Luzzi, M.; Heimberg, P .; Higinbotham, D.W.; et al. The charge form factor of the neutron from the reaction 2H(⃗e, e′n)p. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 82, 4988

    1999

  131. [138]

    Electric form-factor of the neutron from the 2H(⃗e, e′n)1H reaction at Q2 = 0.255 (GeV/c)2

    Eden, T.; Madey, R.; Zhang, W.-M.; Anderson, B.D.; Arenhövel, H.; Baldwin, A.R.; Barkhuff, D.; Beard, K.B.; Bertozzi, W.; Cameron, J.M.; et al. Electric form-factor of the neutron from the 2H(⃗e, e′n)1H reaction at Q2 = 0.255 (GeV/c)2. Phys. Rev. C 1994, 50, 1749

    1994

  132. [139]

    Zhu, H. et al. [E93026 Collaboration]. A measurement of the electric form-factor of the neutron through d(⃗e, e′n)p at Q2 = 0.5 (GeV/c)2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87, 081801

    2001

  133. [140]

    Warren, G. et al. [Jefferson Lab E93-026 Collaboration]. Measurement of the electric form factor of the neutron Q2 = 0.5 (GeV/c)2 and 1.0 (GeV/c)2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 042301. Symmetry 2025, 1, 0 45 of 46

    2004

  134. [141]

    Madey, R. et al. [E93-038 Collaboration]. Measurements of GEn/GMn from 2H(⃗e, e′n)1H reaction to Q2 = 1.45 (GeV/c)2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 91, 122002

    2003

  135. [142]

    Measurements of the Electric Form Factor of the Neutron up to Q2 = 3.4 GeV2 using the Reaction 3He(⃗e, e′n)pp

    Beck, A.; Beck, S.M.-T.; Puckett, A.J.R.; Qiang, Y.; Sirca, S.; Zhu, X. Measurements of the Electric Form Factor of the Neutron up to Q2 = 3.4 GeV2 using the Reaction 3He(⃗e, e′n)pp. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 262302

    2010

  136. [143]

    Neutron charge form factor at large q2

    Schiavilla, R.; Sick, I. Neutron charge form factor at large q2. Phys. Rev. C 2001, 64, 041002

    2001

  137. [144]

    An Empirical fit to the nucleon electromagnetic form-factors

    Bosted, P .E. An Empirical fit to the nucleon electromagnetic form-factors. Phys. Rev. C 1995, 51, 409

    1995

  138. [145]

    Precise neutron magnetic form factors

    Kubon, G.; Anklin, H.; Bartsch, P .; Baumann, D.; Boeglin, W.U.; Bohinc, K.; Böhm, R.; Distler, M.O.; Ewald, I.; Friedrich, J.; et al. Precise neutron magnetic form factors. Phys. Lett. B 2002, 524, 26

    2002

  139. [146]

    Precise measurements of the neutron magnetic form factor

    Anklin, H.; deBever, L.J.; Blomqvist, K.I.; Boeglin, W.U.; Böhm, R.; Distler, M.; Edelhoff, R.; Friedrich, J.; Fritschi, D.; Geiges, R.; et al. Precise measurements of the neutron magnetic form factor. Phys. Lett. B 1998, 428, 248

    1998

  140. [147]

    Precision measurement of the neutron magnetic form-factor

    Anklin, H.; Bruins, E.E.W.; Day, D.; Fritschi, D.; Groft, B.; Joosse, F.C.P .; Jourdan, J.; Lichtenstadt, J.; Loppacher, M.; Masson, G.; et al. Precision measurement of the neutron magnetic form-factor. Phys. Lett. B 1994, 336, 313

    1994

  141. [148]

    Lachniet, J. et al. [CLAS Collaboration]. A Precise Measurement of the Neutron Magnetic Form Factor GMn in the Few-GeV2 Region. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 192001

    2009

  142. [149]

    Review of particle physics

    Nakamura, K.; Particle Data Group. Review of particle physics. J. Phys. G 2010, 37, 075021

    2010

  143. [150]

    Gough; Eschrich, I.M. et al. [SELEX Collaboration]. Measurement of the Σ− charge radius by Σ− electron elastic scattering. Phys. Lett. B 2001, 522, 233

    2001

  144. [151]

    Park, K. et al. [CLAS Collaboration]. Measurement of the generalized form factors near threshold via γ∗ p→ nπ+ at high Q2. Phys. Rev. C 2012, 85, 035208

    2012

  145. [152]

    Review of Particle Physics

    Particle Data Group; Workman, R.L.; Burkert, V .D.; Crede, V .; Klempt, E.; Thoma, U.; Tiator, L.; Agashe, K.; Aielli, G.; Allanach, B.C.; et al. Review of Particle Physics. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 2022, 083C01

    2022

  146. [153]

    Axial and pseudoscalar nucleon form-factors from low-energy pion electroproduction

    Choi, S.; Duval, M.A.; Elouadrhiri, L.; Estenne, V .; Bardin, G.; Berthot, J.; Bertin, P .Y.; Botton, N.D.; Didelez, J.P .; Fonvieille, H.; et al. Axial and pseudoscalar nucleon form-factors from low-energy pion electroproduction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993, 71, 3927

    1993

  147. [154]

    Magnetic moments of the octet, decuplet, low-lying charm, and low-lying bottom baryons in a nuclear medium

    Tsushima, K. Magnetic moments of the octet, decuplet, low-lying charm, and low-lying bottom baryons in a nuclear medium. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 2022, 043D02

    2022

  148. [155]

    Cobos-Martínez, J.J.; Tsushima, K.; Krein, G.; Thomas, A.W.ϕ meson mass and decay width in nuclear matter and nuclei. Phys. Lett. B 2017, 771, 113

    2017

  149. [156]

    Decay of the pi meson

    Goldberger, M.L.; Treiman, S.B. Decay of the pi meson. Phys. Rev. 1958, 110, 1178

    1958

  150. [157]

    In-medium chiral perturbation theory and pion weak decay in the presence of background matter

    Kirchbach, M.; Wirzba, A. In-medium chiral perturbation theory and pion weak decay in the presence of background matter. Nucl. Phys. A 1997, 616, 648

    1997

  151. [158]

    Christy, M.E. et al. [E94110 Collaboration]. Measurements of electron proton elastic cross-sections for 0.4 < Q2 < 5.5 (GeV/c)2. Phys. Rev. C 2004, 70, 015206

    2004

  152. [159]

    Proton elastic form-factor ratios to Q2 = 3.5 GeV2 by polarization transfer

    Punjabi, V .; Perdrisat, C.F.; Aniol, K.A.; Baker, F.T.; Berthot, J.; Bertin, P .Y.; Bertozzi, W.; Besson, A.; Bimbot, L.; Boeglin, W.U.; et al. Proton elastic form-factor ratios to Q2 = 3.5 GeV2 by polarization transfer. Phys. Rev. C 2005, 71, 055202. Erratum in Phys. Rev. C ...

    2005

  153. [160]

    Final Analysis of Proton Form Factor Ratio Data at Q2 = 4.0, 4.8 and 5.6 GeV2

    Puckett, A.J.R.; Brash, E.J.; Gayou, O.; Jones, M.K.; Pentchev, L.; Perdrisat, C.F.; Punjabi, V .; Aniol, K.A.; Averett, T.; Benmokhtar, F.; et al. Final Analysis of Proton Form Factor Ratio Data at Q2 = 4.0, 4.8 and 5.6 GeV2. Phys. Rev. C 2012, 85, 045203

    2012

  154. [161]

    Polarization Transfer Observables in Elastic Electron Proton Scattering at Q2 =2.5, 5.2, 6.8, and 8.5 GeV2

    Puckett, A.J.R.; Brash, E.J.; Jones, M.K.; Luo, W.; Meziane, M.; Pentchev, L.; Perdrisat, C.F.; Punjabi, V .; Wesselmann, F.R.; Afanasev, A.; et al. Polarization Transfer Observables in Elastic Electron Proton Scattering at Q2 =2.5, 5.2, 6.8, and 8.5 GeV2. Phys. Rev. C 2017, 9...

    2017

  155. [162]

    Effects of the density-dependent weak form factors on the neutrino reaction via neutral current for the nucleon in nuclear medium and 12C

    Cheoun, M.K.; Choi, K.S.; Kim, K.S.; Saito, K.; Kajino, T.; Tsushima, K.; Maruyama, T. Effects of the density-dependent weak form factors on the neutrino reaction via neutral current for the nucleon in nuclear medium and 12C. Phys. Rev. C 2013, 87, 065502

    2013

  156. [163]

    Asymmetry in the neutrino and anti-neutrino reactions in a nuclear medium

    Cheoun, M.K.; Choi, K.; Kim, K.S.; Saito, K.; Kajino, T.; Tsushima, K.; Maruyama, T. Asymmetry in the neutrino and anti-neutrino reactions in a nuclear medium. Phys. Lett. B 2013, 723, 464

    2013

  157. [164]

    Measurement of the axial vector form factor from antineutrino-proton scattering

    Cai, T.; Moore, M.L.; Olivier, A.; Akhter, S.; Dar, Z.A.; Ansari, V .; Ascencio, M.V .; Bashyal, A.; Bercellie, A.; Betancourt, M.; et al. Measurement of the axial vector form factor from antineutrino-proton scattering. Nature 2023, 614, 48

    2023

  158. [165]

    Abud, A.A. et al. [The DUNE collaboration]. Searching for solar KDAR with DUNE. JCAP 2021, 10, 065

    2021

  159. [166]

    Strangeness in the nucleon: Neutrino-nucleon and polarized electron-nucleon scattering

    Alberico, W.M.; Bilenky, S.M.; Maieron, C. Strangeness in the nucleon: Neutrino-nucleon and polarized electron-nucleon scattering. Phys. Rept. 2002, 358, 227

    2002

  160. [167]

    Measurement of Neutrino—Proton and anti-neutrino-Proton Elastic Scattering

    Ahrens, L.A.; Aronson, S.H.; Connolly, P .L.; Gibbard, B.G.; Murtagh, M.J.; Murtagh, S.J.; Terada, S.; White, D.H.; Callas, J.L.; Cutts, D.; et al. Measurement of Neutrino—Proton and anti-neutrino-Proton Elastic Scattering. Phys. Rev. D 1987, 35, 785

    1987

  161. [168]

    Neutrinos and their interactions with matter

    Athar, M.S.; Fatima, A.; Singh, S.K. Neutrinos and their interactions with matter. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2023, 129, 104019

    2023

  162. [169]

    Theoretical tools for neutrino scattering: Interplay between lattice QCD, EFTs, nuclear physics, phenomenology, and neutrino event generators

    Ruso, L.A.; Ankowski, A.M.; Bacca, S.; Balantekin, A.B.; Carlson, J.; Gardiner, S.; González-Jiménez, R.; Gupta, R.; Hobbs, T.J.; Hoferichter, M.; et al. Theoretical tools for neutrino scattering: Interplay between lattice QCD, EFTs, nuclear physics, phenomenology, and neutrin...

    2022 arXiv

  163. [170]

    The COHERENT Experimental Program

    Akimov, D.; Alawabdeh, S.; An, P .; Awe, C.; Barbeau, P .S.; Barry, C.; Becker, B.; Belov, V .; Bernardi, I.; Bock, C.; et al. The COHERENT Experimental Program. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2204.04575

    2022 arXiv

  164. [171]

    Form factor and model dependence in neutrino-nucleus cross section predictions

    Simons, D.; Steinberg, N.; Lovato, A.; Meurice, Y.; Rocco, N.; Wagman, M. Form factor and model dependence in neutrino-nucleus cross section predictions. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2210.02455

    2022 arXiv

  165. [172]

    Coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering: EFT analysis and nuclear responses

    Hoferichter, M.; Menéndez, J.; Schwenk, A. Coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering: EFT analysis and nuclear responses. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 102, 074018

    2020

  166. [173]

    Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering with directional detectors

    Abdullah, M.; Aristizabal Sierra, D.; Dutta, B.; Strigari, L.E. Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering with directional detectors. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 102, 015009

    2020

  167. [174]

    A view of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering

    Cadeddu, M.; Dordei, F.; Giunti, C. A view of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering. EPL 2023, 143, 34001

    2023

  168. [175]

    Recoil momentum spectrum in directional dark matter detectors

    Gondolo, P . Recoil momentum spectrum in directional dark matter detectors. Phys. Rev. D 2002, 66, 103513

    2002

  169. [177]

    Impact of medium modifications of the nucleon weak and electromagnetic form factors on the neutrino mean free path in dense matter

    Hutauruk, P .T.P .; Oh, Y.; Tsushima, K. Impact of medium modifications of the nucleon weak and electromagnetic form factors on the neutrino mean free path in dense matter. Phys. Rev. D 2018, 98, 013009. Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained ...

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.