Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 209 references

Sub-Horizon Amplification of Curvature Perturbations: A New Route to Primordial Black Holes and Gravitational Waves

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Sub-horizon amplification of curvature perturbations occurs for every negative value of the second slow-roll parameter, not just the traditional ultra-slow-roll regime.

desk verdict A sound but largely derivative parameter study of negative ε2 amplification; the 'new route' lacks a realized potential and the claims outrun the evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.16059 v1 pith:VRLUIXFQ submitted 2025-04-22 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-phhep-th

Debottam Nandi (CCSP , SGT University) , Rohan Roy , Simran Yadav , Arnab Sarkar This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.COgr-qchep-phhep-th
keywords primordialblackholesscalar-inducedgravitationalwavesultra-slow-rollinflationsecondslow-rollparametersub-horizonamplificationcurvaturepowerspectrumsingle-fieldpulsartimingarrays
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the standard requirement for amplifying curvature perturbations during inflation—a second slow-roll parameter $\epsilon_2 \lesssim -6$, as in ultra-slow-roll—is too strict. Its central assertion is that any negative value of $\epsilon_2$ amplifies the spectrum, because modes still inside the horizon grow when the first slow-roll parameter $\epsilon_1$ decreases, and the power spectrum is inversely proportional to $\epsilon_1$. If this is right, a mild phase with $\epsilon_2=-1$ lasting about sixteen e-folds can raise the spectrum from the CMB value $2.1\times10^{-9}$ to the $10^{-2}$ level needed for primordial black holes and scalar-induced gravitational waves. The authors demonstrate the claim in a three-phase slow-roll/ultra-slow-roll/slow-roll setup with constant $\epsilon_2$ in the intermediate phase, and compute the resulting power spectra, gravitational-wave backgrounds, and black-hole abundances.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the mode function of the curvature perturbation on sub-horizon scales, ${\cal R}_k = u_k/z$ with $z=a\sqrt{2\epsilon_1}$. In the sub-horizon limit the Mukhanov-Sasaki variable $u_k$ oscillates with constant amplitude, so any decline in $\epsilon_1$ directly boosts ${\cal R}_k$; writing $\epsilon_1\propto a^{-\alpha}$ turns this into the amplification law $P_{\cal R}\sim a^\alpha P_{\cal R}^{\rm SR}$ with $\epsilon_2=-\alpha$. Matching Bogoliubov coefficients across the three phases determines the full spectrum, and the same spectra feed the standard second-order scalar-induced gravitational-wave integrals and the Press-Schechter calculation of the black-hole abundance.

What would settle it

Numerically integrate the Mukhanov-Sasaki equation for an explicit single-field potential engineered to hold $\epsilon_2=-1$ for sixteen e-folds and compute the one-loop correction to the power spectrum; if the spectrum falls short of $10^{-2}$ or the loop correction is comparable to the tree-level result, the claimed necessary-and-sufficient amplification fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's discovery is that the amplification of the curvature perturbation does not require super-horizon growth. On sub-horizon scales the Mukhanov-Sasaki variable is nearly constant, so ${\cal R}_k = u_k/(a\sqrt{2\epsilon_1})$ scales as $(a\sqrt{\epsilon_1})^{-1}$. If the first slow-roll parameter falls as $\epsilon_1\propto a^{-\alpha}$ during an intermediate phase, then ${\cal R}_k\propto a^{\alpha/2}$ and the power spectrum grows as $P_{\cal R}\sim a^{\alpha}P_{\cal R}^{\rm SR}$, with $\epsilon_2=-\alpha$ by definition. Hence every negative $\epsilon_2$ produces sub-horizon amplification; super-horizon growth turns on only when $\epsilon_2\le -3$. The paper concludes that the traditional ultra-slow-roll condition $\epsilon_2\lesssim -6$ is one special case, not a prerequisite, and that a constant $\epsilon_2=-1$ over roughly sixteen e-folds is enough to reach PBH-relevant amplitudes.

Load-bearing premise

The result hinges on the assumption that a single scalar field can actually maintain a mildly negative second slow-roll parameter (for example $\epsilon_2=-1$) for the roughly sixteen e-folds required, while the Hubble rate stays nearly constant and the perturbations remain in the linear Bunch-Davies regime; the paper asserts that bumps or inflection points can do this, but it does not construct such a potential or check that backreaction and loop corrections stay small.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Observational searches for primordial black holes and scalar-induced gravitational waves should no longer be restricted to models with $\epsilon_2\lesssim -6$.
  • For $-3<\epsilon_2<0$ the entire enhancement occurs inside the horizon, so the shape of the spectrum and the resulting gravitational-wave signal differ from standard ultra-slow-roll and carry a signature of the value of $\epsilon_2$.
  • A phase with $\epsilon_2=-1$ must last about sixteen e-folds to reach $P_{\cal R}\sim 10^{-2}$, a concrete duration target for model builders.
  • The predicted gravitational-wave backgrounds for $\epsilon_2=-1$ through $-10$ fall within the sensitivity of current pulsar timing arrays and planned interferometers, making the mechanism testable.
  • Any inflationary model that permits a sub-horizon boost of curvature perturbations will necessarily yield an enhanced spectrum, independent of super-horizon behavior.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: for time-dependent negative $\epsilon_2$, the same inverse-$\epsilon_1$ mechanism should operate, but the required duration and the spectral shape will depend on the entire history of $\epsilon_1$, not just its instantaneous value.
  • Editorial inference: the paper's black-hole abundances assume Gaussian statistics; if a mild slow-roll violation generates significant non-Gaussianity, the exponential sensitivity of the collapse fraction could raise or lower $f_{\rm PBH}$ enough to change observational conclusions, so a bispectrum calculation for $\epsilon_2=-1$ is a natural next check.
  • Editorial inference: the argument suggests a direct model-building route—prescribe a target $\epsilon_2(N)$ profile and reconstruct the potential from it—bypassing the need for a named feature such as a bump or inflection point.
  • Editorial inference: the same sub-horizon amplification logic should carry over to non-canonical or modified-gravity inflationary actions in which an effective negative $\epsilon_2$ can be engineered, although the required transfer has not been worked out in this paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies curvature perturbation amplification during inflation in a single canonical scalar field, using a three-phase SR-USR-SR background with a piecewise constant second slow-roll parameter epsilon2. Its central claim is that any negative value of epsilon2 amplifies the scalar power spectrum through sub-horizon growth, so the conventional requirement epsilon2 <= -6 is not necessary. The authors illustrate this for constant epsilon2 between -1 and -10, compute the resulting scalar-induced gravitational wave spectra and primordial black hole abundances, and argue that such signals are testable by current and future experiments. The core linear-theory relation is that for epsilon1 ∝ a^{-alpha}, the curvature perturbation at horizon crossing is amplified as P_R ∼ a^alpha P_R^sr, which follows from the Mukhanov-Sasaki equation with z = a sqrt(2 epsilon1).

Significance. The observation that a decreasing epsilon1 amplifies the curvature power spectrum through the standard relation P_R = H^2/(8π^2 epsilon1), and that this does not require epsilon2 <= -6, is correct and, if embedded in a concrete inflationary model, would broaden the parameter space for single-field PBH and SIGW production. The analytic Hankel-function matching for piecewise constant epsilon2 is clearly presented and yields distinct spectral shapes for different epsilon2 values, which could serve as a useful diagnostic. However, the significance as a new route is currently limited by the absence of an explicit scalar potential realizing the assumed background, by the admitted tuning of the peak amplitude to ~10^-2, and by the paper's failure to engage with the one-loop no-go constraints it cites. As it stands, the result is a valid statement about mode evolution in an idealized background rather than a demonstrated mechanism for PBH and GW production.

major comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 5, Eqs. (5.1)-(5.2); Sec. 8] The assumed background is never realized in terms of a scalar potential. For constant epsilon2 = -alpha, Eqs. (2.8) and (3.1) imply V_phi = -(3 - alpha/2) H phi_dot, a fine-tuned force balance, and the paper gives no V(phi) that enters and exits this phase, maintains continuity of the field and its derivative, and eventually ends inflation. The statement in Sec. 8 that the potential can be reconstructed phenomenologically is not supported by a demonstration, so the proposed route remains an idealized trajectory rather than a demonstrated mechanism.
  2. [Abstract and Sec. 4, Eqs. (4.5)-(4.6)] The phrase 'necessary and sufficient condition for amplification' overstates the result. The derivation shows that a decreasing epsilon1 is sufficient for modes that remain sub-horizon for the full phase, but it does not establish necessity (other amplification mechanisms exist), and sufficiency in practice requires a long phase (alpha Delta N ~ 15.4 for alpha = 1) and a background that avoids backreaction. The paper's own Fig. 1 shows that modes crossing before the USR phase are not amplified, so the claim should be restricted to sub-horizon modes with sufficient exposure to the phase.
  3. [Fig. 2 caption; Secs. 6-7] The values of eta1 and eta2 are 'chosen meticulously to obtain an power spectrum of order ~10^-2' (Fig. 2 caption), so the PBH abundances and SIGW spectra in Figs. 3-4 are illustrations of a tuned peak, not predictions. The conclusion in Sec. 6 that 'any negative epsilon2 can generate a significant gravitational wave background' is circular unless the amplitude is derived from a model rather than imposed by the choice of eta1 and eta2.
  4. [Sec. 8 and Refs. [127,131]] The one-loop no-go constraints on PBH formation in single-field inflation are cited but not engaged. During the proposed phase, epsilon1 is suppressed by a factor ~10^7 relative to its SR value and the peak P_R is ~10^-2, so the curvature perturbation is O(0.1), raising the question whether loop corrections invalidate the tree-level result. The authors should either demonstrate that the mild-epsilon2 case evades these constraints or substantially soften the viability claim.
  5. [Secs. 5.2-5.3, matching conditions] The paper states that the Bogoliubov coefficients are fixed by 'continuity and smoothness conditions' of the curvature perturbation at eta1 and eta2. Since epsilon2 is discontinuous at these points, z'/z jumps, and the correct junction condition for the canonical variable u (or for R with a jump in R') is not simply R and R' continuous. The authors should specify the matching variables explicitly; if R' is imposed continuous, the mode functions may be incorrect.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (5.12)] The second interval in the piecewise definition should read eta1 <= eta <= eta2, not eta1 <= eta <= eta1.
  2. [Eqs. (5.1)-(5.2) and figures] The notation epsilon2_usr is used inconsistently: Eq. (5.1) defines epsilon2 = -epsilon2_usr, while the text and figures label epsilon2_usr = -1, -2, etc. Please define epsilon2_usr as a positive magnitude or adjust the equations accordingly.
  3. [Eq. (4.6)] In PR ∼ a^alpha P_R^sr, the scale factor ratio at which the amplification is evaluated should be specified; as written, it could be confused with the total number of e-folds of inflation.
  4. [Introduction and Sec. 6] The paper uses 'PGWs' and 'SIGWs' without defining the distinction; please define both terms in the introduction where the acronyms first appear.
  5. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption contains grammatical errors ('an power spectrum of order ~10^-2'), and some panels do not clearly show the low-k tail; please improve the caption and axis ranges.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the core amplification relation is a self-contained corollary of the Mukhanov-Sasaki equation and standard slow-roll definitions; the observational forecasts are explicit parameter illustrations rather than hidden fits.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation (Sec. 4) starts from the linear Mukhanov-Sasaki equation with Bunch-Davies initial conditions and obtains P_R ~ a^alpha P_R^sr for epsilon1 proportional to a^{-alpha}, with epsilon2 = -alpha. This is a direct algebraic consequence of the standard slow-roll amplitude P_R ~ H^2/(8 pi^2 epsilon1) and the definition epsilon2 = d ln epsilon1 / dN; it is a corollary, not a circular assumption, and no prior result of the authors is needed to reach it. The choices of eta1 and eta2 in Figs. 2-4 are explicitly described as 'chosen meticulously to obtain a power spectrum of order ~10^{-2}'; this is an open parameter normalization for an illustrative forecast, not a fit to GW/PBH data that is then relabeled as a prediction. The SIGW and PBH abundances are standard integrals of the chosen P_R and are not fed back into the derivation. The paper contains no load-bearing self-citation: refs. [127,131] are listed but the argument does not rest on them. The admitted lack of an explicit potential realizing the constant epsilon2 = -1 phase for Delta N ~ 16, and the unaddressed one-loop no-go constraints, are model-realization/correctness concerns rather than circularity. Overall the derivation chain is self-contained, so no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation is self-contained linear perturbation theory, but the model inputs are imposed: a piecewise constant epsilon2 background, representative values for epsilon_sr and epsilon2_SRII, and phase boundaries tuned to reach P_R ~ 10^-2. The PBH and GW forecasts add standard assumptions about Gaussianity, collapse threshold, and radiation domination. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (6)
  • epsilon_sr (SR-I first slow-roll parameter) = 10^-3 (representative)
    Adopted as a representative small value consistent with small-field inflation; sets normalization of the CMB-scale spectrum but is not fitted to Planck data in the paper.
  • eta1 and eta2 (USR onset and end) = case-dependent; e.g., for epsilon2=-1: eta1=-3e-6 Mpc, eta2=-3.3e-13 Mpc
    Chosen to force the peak scalar power spectrum to about 10^-2; this choice fixes the amplitude of the derived GW and PBH signals.
  • epsilon2_USR = -1, -2, -3, -6, -8, -10
    Scanned constant values of the second slow-roll parameter in the middle phase.
  • delta_c = 1/3
    Critical density contrast for PBH collapse, taken from the literature; f_PBH depends on it exponentially.
  • gamma = 0.2
    Collapse efficiency used to convert horizon mass to PBH mass.
  • epsilon2_SRII = 1/3
    Representative small positive value in the final slow-roll phase; any value less than unity would be acceptable.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Linearized Mukhanov-Sasaki equation with Bunch-Davies vacuum initial conditions.
    Used throughout Sections 2-5 to compute the curvature perturbation and power spectrum.
  • domain assumption Quasi-de Sitter background with a = -1/(H eta) and nearly constant H in all three phases.
    Invoked in Section 5 to write z and the slow-roll parameter evolution; requires epsilon1 << 1 at all times even when it decays to 10^-7 of its initial value.
  • ad hoc to paper Instantaneous transitions between SR-I, USR, and SR-II with continuity and smoothness matching of the mode functions.
    The piecewise constant epsilon2 model in Eqs. (5.1)-(5.2) is imposed rather than derived from a potential; the paper asserts bumps or inflection points can realize it but gives no explicit construction.
  • domain assumption Gaussian statistics and Press-Schechter formalism for PBH abundance.
    Used in Section 7 (Eqs. 7.3-7.5); with P_R ~ 0.01, non-Gaussian corrections and quantum-loop effects could be important and are not modeled.
  • domain assumption Radiation-dominated universe at horizon re-entry for SIGW and PBH calculations.
    Used in Sections 6-7; assumes the usual thermal history and no early matter or exotic phase before BBN.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sub-Horizon Amplification of Curvature Perturbations: A New Route to Primordial Black Holes and Gravitational Waves." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VRLUIXFQ

@misc{pith2026250416059,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sub-Horizon Amplification of Curvature Perturbations: A New Route to Primordial Black Holes and Gravitational Waves},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VRLUIXFQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.16059}
}
abstract

The enhanced primordial scalar power spectrum is a widely studied mechanism for generating primordial gravitational waves (PGWs), also referred to as scalar-induced gravitational waves (SIGWs). This process also plays a pivotal role in facilitating the formation of primordial black holes (PBHs). Traditionally, the ultra slow-roll (USR) mechanism has been the predominant approach used in the early universe. In this framework, the second slow-roll parameter $\epsilon_2$, is typically set to $-6$ or lower for a brief period -- marking a significant departure from the standard slow-roll condition where $\epsilon_2 \simeq 0$. Such conditions often emerge in models with inflection points or localized features, such as bumps in the potential. In this paper, we challenge the conventional assumption that $\epsilon_2 \lesssim -6$ is a prerequisite for substantial amplification of the scalar power spectrum. We demonstrate that any negative value of the second slow-roll parameter can indeed enhance the scalar power spectrum through sub-horizon growth, establishing this as a necessary and sufficient condition for amplification. Consequently, this mechanism facilitates the generation of both PGWs and PBHs. To illustrate this, we examine a standard scenario where a brief USR phase is embedded between two slow-roll (SR) phases. By systematically varying $\epsilon_{2}$ values from $-1$ to $-10$ in the USR region, we investigate the amplification of the power spectrum and its implications for PGWs and PBHs production, particularly in the context of ongoing and future cosmological missions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

209 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [99]

    Noh and J.-c

    H. Noh and J.-c. Hwang, Second-order perturbations of the friedmann world model , Phys. Rev. D 69 (05, 2004) 104011

    2004

  2. [205]

    A. D. Gow, C. T. Byrnes, P. S. Cole, and S. Young, The power spectrum on small scales: Robust constraints and comparing PBH methodologies , JCAP 02 (2021) 002, [arXiv:2008.0328]

    work page arXiv 2021

  3. [1]

    Akrami et

    Planck Collaboration, Y. Akrami et. al., Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A10, [ arXiv:1807.0621]. – 20 –

    arXiv 2020

  4. [2]

    Aghanim et

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim et. al., Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6, [ arXiv:1807.0620]. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    arXiv 2020

  5. [3]

    A. A. Starobinsky, Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe, JETP Lett. 30 (1979) 682–685

    1979

  6. [4]

    A. A. Starobinsky, A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity , Phys. Lett. B 91 (1980) 99–102

    1980

  7. [5]

    A. H. Guth, Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems , Phys. Rev. D 23 (Jan, 1981) 347–356

    1981

  8. [6]

    V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov, Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe , JETP Lett. 33 (1981) 532–535. [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.33,549(1981)]

    1981

Show all 209 references
  1. [7]

    Linde, A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems , Physics Letters B 108 (1982), no

    A. Linde, A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems , Physics Letters B 108 (1982), no. 6 389–393

    1982

  2. [8]

    Hawking, The development of irregularities in a single bubble inflationary universe , Physics Letters B 115 (1982), no

    S. Hawking, The development of irregularities in a single bubble inflationary universe , Physics Letters B 115 (1982), no. 4 295–297

    1982

  3. [9]

    A. H. Guth and S.-Y. Pi, Fluctuations in the new inflationary universe , Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (Oct, 1982) 1110–1113

    1982

  4. [10]

    Sasaki, Large Scale Quantum Fluctuations in the Inflationary Universe , Progress of Theoretical Physics 76 (1986) 1036–1046

    M. Sasaki, Large Scale Quantum Fluctuations in the Inflationary Universe , Progress of Theoretical Physics 76 (1986) 1036–1046

    1986

  5. [11]

    Albrecht and P

    A. Albrecht and P. J. Steinhardt, Cosmology for grand unified theories with radiatively induced symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (Apr, 1982) 1220–1223

    1982

  6. [12]

    A. D. Linde, Chaotic Inflation, Phys. Lett. 129B (1983) 177–181

    1983

  7. [13]

    Vilenkin, Quantum fluctuations in the new inflationary universe , Nuclear Physics B 226 (1983), no

    A. Vilenkin, Quantum fluctuations in the new inflationary universe , Nuclear Physics B 226 (1983), no. 2 527–546

    1983

  8. [14]

    J. M. Bardeen, P. J. Steinhardt, and M. S. Turner, Spontaneous creation of almost scale-free density perturbations in an inflationary universe , Phys. Rev. D 28 (Aug, 1983) 679–693

    1983

  9. [15]

    V. F. Mukhanov, H. Feldman, and R. H. Brandenberger, Theory of cosmological perturbations. Part 1. Classical perturbations. Part 2. Quantum theory of perturbations. Part

  10. [16]

    215 (1992) 203–333

    Extensions, Phys.Rept. 215 (1992) 203–333

    1992

  11. [17]

    A. R. Liddle, P. Parsons, and J. D. Barrow, Formalizing the slow roll approximation in inflation, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 7222–7232, [ astro-ph/9408015]

    1994 arXiv

  12. [18]

    J. E. Lidsey, A. R. Liddle, E. W. Kolb, E. J. Copeland, T. Barreiro, et. al., Reconstructing the inflation potential : An overview , Rev.Mod.Phys. 69 (1997) 373–410, [ astro-ph/9508078]

    1997 arXiv

  13. [19]

    E. J. Copeland, A. R. Liddle, and D. Wands, Exponential potentials and cosmological scaling solutions, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 4686–4690, [ gr-qc/9711068]

    1998 arXiv

  14. [20]

    D. H. Lyth, Particle physics models of inflation , Lect. Notes Phys. 738 (2008) 81–118, [hep-th/0702128]

    2008 arXiv

  15. [21]

    Sriramkumar, An introduction to inflation and cosmological perturbation theory , arXiv:0904.4584

    L. Sriramkumar, An introduction to inflation and cosmological perturbation theory , arXiv:0904.4584

    arXiv

  16. [22]

    Martin, C

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval, and V. Vennin, Encyclopædia Inflationaris, Phys. Dark Univ. 5-6 (2014) 75–235, [ arXiv:1303.3787]

    2014 arXiv

  17. [23]

    Martin, The Observational Status of Cosmic Inflation after Planck , Astrophys

    J. Martin, The Observational Status of Cosmic Inflation after Planck , Astrophys. Space Sci. Proc. 45 (2016) 41–134, [ arXiv:1502.0573]. – 21 –

    2016

  18. [26]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et. al., Upper Limits on the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background from Advanced LIGO’s First Observing Run , Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017), no. 12 121101, [ arXiv:1612.0202]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 119, 029901 (2017)]

    2017

  19. [27]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et. al., GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016), no. 24 241103, [ arXiv:1606.0485]

    2016

  20. [28]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et. al., GW150914: First results from the search for binary black hole coalescence with Advanced LIGO , Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016), no. 12 122003, [ arXiv:1602.0383]

    2016

  21. [29]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et. al., Properties of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914 , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016), no. 24 241102, [ arXiv:1602.0384]

    2016

  22. [30]

    LIGO Scientific, VIRGO Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et. al., GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2 , Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017), no. 22 221101, [ arXiv:1706.0181]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 129901 (2018)]

    2017

  23. [31]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. . P. . Abbott et. al., GW170608: Observation of a 19-solar-mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence , Astrophys. J. Lett. 851 (2017) L35, [arXiv:1711.0557]

    2017

  24. [32]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et. al., GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral , Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017), no. 16 161101, [arXiv:1710.0583]

    2017

  25. [33]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et. al., GW170814: A Three-Detector Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Coalescence , Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017), no. 14 141101, [ arXiv:1709.0966]

    2017

  26. [34]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et. al., Search for Subsolar-Mass Ultracompact Binaries in Advanced LIGO’s First Observing Run , Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018), no. 23 231103, [ arXiv:1808.0477]

    2018

  27. [35]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et. al., GW190425: Observation of a Compact Binary Coalescence with Total Mass ∼ 3.4M⊙, Astrophys. J. Lett. 892 (2020), no. 1 L3, [arXiv:2001.0176]

    2020

  28. [36]

    Abbott et

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, R. Abbott et. al., GW190412: Observation of a Binary-Black-Hole Coalescence with Asymmetric Masses , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020), no. 4 043015, [arXiv:2004.0834]

    2020

  29. [37]

    Abbott et

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, R. Abbott et. al., GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 Solar Mass Black Hole with a 2.6 Solar Mass Compact Object , Astrophys. J. Lett. 896 (2020), no. 2 L44, [ arXiv:2006.1261]

    2020

  30. [38]

    Arzoumanian et

    NANOGrav Collaboration, Z. Arzoumanian et. al., The NANOGrav 12.5 yr Data Set: Search for an Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background , Astrophys. J. Lett. 905 (2020), no. 2 L34, [ arXiv:2009.0449]

    2020

  31. [39]

    Arzoumanian et

    NANOGrav Collaboration, Z. Arzoumanian et. al., Searching for Gravitational Waves from Cosmological Phase Transitions with the NANOGrav 12.5-Year Dataset , Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021), no. 25 251302, [ arXiv:2104.1393]. – 22 –

    2021

  32. [48]

    Goncharov et

    B. Goncharov et. al., On the Evidence for a Common-spectrum Process in the Search for the Nanohertz Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array , Astrophys. J. Lett. 917 (2021), no. 2 L19, [ arXiv:2107.1211]

    2021

  33. [49]

    EPTA Collaboration, S. Chen et. al., Common-red-signal analysis with 24-yr high-precision timing of the European Pulsar Timing Array: inferences in the stochastic gravitational-wave background search, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 508 (2021), no. 4 4970–4993, [arXiv:2110.1318]

    2021

  34. [51]

    Antoniadis et

    EPTA, InPTA: Collaboration, J. Antoniadis et. al., The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitational wave signals , Astron. Astrophys. 678 (2023) A50, [ arXiv:2306.1621]

    2023

  35. [55]

    Smarra et

    European Pulsar Timing Array Collaboration, C. Smarra et. al., Second Data Release from the European Pulsar Timing Array: Challenging the Ultralight Dark Matter Paradigm , Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023), no. 17 171001, [ arXiv:2306.1622]. – 23 –

    2023

  36. [56]

    Antoniadis et

    J. Antoniadis et. al., The International Pulsar Timing Array second data release: Search for an isotropic gravitational wave background , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 510 (2022), no. 4 4873–4887, [arXiv:2201.0398]

    2022

  37. [57]

    Assadullahi and D

    H. Assadullahi and D. Wands, Constraints on primordial density perturbations from induced gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 023527, [ arXiv:0907.4073]

    2010 arXiv

  38. [58]

    J.-O. Gong, S. Pi, and G. Leung, Probing reheating with primordial spectrum, JCAP 1505 (2015), no. 05 027, [ arXiv:1501.0360]

    2015

  39. [59]

    Bartolo et

    N. Bartolo et. al., Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. IV: Probing inflation with gravitational waves , JCAP 12 (2016) 026, [ arXiv:1610.0648]

    2016

  40. [60]

    Y. Cui, M. Lewicki, D. E. Morrissey, and J. D. Wells, Probing the pre-BBN universe with gravitational waves from cosmic strings , JHEP 01 (2019) 081, [ arXiv:1808.0896]

    2019

  41. [61]

    Dom` enech, S

    G. Dom` enech, S. Pi, and M. Sasaki, Induced gravitational waves as a probe of thermal history of the universe , JCAP 08 (2020) 017, [ arXiv:2005.1231]

    2020

  42. [62]

    Liu, Z.-C

    L. Liu, Z.-C. Chen, and Q.-G. Huang, Implications for the non-Gaussianity of curvature perturbation from pulsar timing arrays , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 6 L061301, [arXiv:2307.0110]

    2024

  43. [63]

    Nakai, M

    Y. Nakai, M. Suzuki, F. Takahashi, and M. Yamada, Gravitational Waves and Dark Radiation from Dark Phase Transition: Connecting NANOGrav Pulsar Timing Data and Hubble Tension, Phys. Lett. B 816 (2021) 136238, [ arXiv:2009.0975]

    2021

  44. [64]

    Freese and M

    K. Freese and M. W. Winkler, Have pulsar timing arrays detected the hot big bang: Gravitational waves from strong first order phase transitions in the early Universe , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022), no. 10 103523, [ arXiv:2208.0333]

    2022

  45. [65]

    Morgante, N

    E. Morgante, N. Ramberg, and P. Schwaller, Gravitational waves from dark SU(3) Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023), no. 3 036010, [ arXiv:2210.1182]

    2023

  46. [66]

    Bringmann, P

    T. Bringmann, P. F. Depta, T. Konstandin, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, and C. Tasillo, Does NANOGrav observe a dark sector phase transition? , JCAP 11 (2023) 053, [arXiv:2306.0941]

    2023

  47. [67]

    Wang, Novel Physics with International Pulsar Timing Array: Axionlike Particles, Domain Walls and Cosmic Strings , arXiv:2203.1095

    D. Wang, Novel Physics with International Pulsar Timing Array: Axionlike Particles, Domain Walls and Cosmic Strings , arXiv:2203.1095

  48. [68]

    R. Z. Ferreira, A. Notari, O. Pujolas, and F. Rompineve, Gravitational waves from domain walls in Pulsar Timing Array datasets , JCAP 02 (2023) 001, [ arXiv:2204.0422]

    2023

  49. [69]

    Blasi, V

    S. Blasi, V. Brdar, and K. Schmitz, Has NANOGrav found first evidence for cosmic strings? , Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021), no. 4 041305, [ arXiv:2009.0660]

    2021

  50. [70]

    Ellis and M

    J. Ellis and M. Lewicki, Cosmic String Interpretation of NANOGrav Pulsar Timing Data , Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021), no. 4 041304, [ arXiv:2009.0655]

    2021

  51. [71]

    Buchmuller, V

    W. Buchmuller, V. Domcke, and K. Schmitz, From NANOGrav to LIGO with metastable cosmic strings, Phys. Lett. B 811 (2020) 135914, [ arXiv:2009.1064]

    2020

  52. [72]

    Bean and J

    R. Bean and J. Magueijo, Could supermassive black holes be quintessential primordial black holes?, Phys. Rev. D66 (2002) 063505, [ astro-ph/0204486]

    2002 arXiv

  53. [73]

    Duechting, Supermassive black holes from primordial black hole seeds , Phys

    N. Duechting, Supermassive black holes from primordial black hole seeds , Phys. Rev. D70 (2004) 064015, [ astro-ph/0406260]

    2004 arXiv

  54. [74]

    Shannon et

    R. Shannon et. al., Gravitational waves from binary supermassive black holes missing in pulsar observations, Science 349 (2015), no. 6255 1522–1525, [ arXiv:1509.0732]

    2015

  55. [75]

    K. L. Pandey and A. Mangalam, Role of primordial black holes in the direct collapse scenario of supermassive black hole formation at high redshifts , J. Astrophys. Astron. 39 (2018) 9, [arXiv:1801.0664]. – 24 –

    2018

  56. [76]

    B´ ecsy, N

    B. B´ ecsy, N. J. Cornish, and L. Z. Kelley, Exploring Realistic Nanohertz Gravitational-wave Backgrounds, Astrophys. J. 941 (2022), no. 2 119, [ arXiv:2207.0160]

    2022

  57. [77]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. Fairbairn, G. H¨ utsi, M. Raidal, J. Urrutia, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veerm¨ ae, Prospects for future binary black hole gravitational wave studies in light of PTA measurements, Astron. Astrophys. 676 (2023) A38, [ arXiv:2301.1385]

    2023

  58. [78]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. Fairbairn, G. H¨ utsi, J. Raidal, J. Urrutia, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veerm¨ ae, Gravitational waves from supermassive black hole binaries in light of the NANOGrav 15-year data, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 2 L021302, [ arXiv:2306.1702]

    2024

  59. [79]

    C. Unal, A. Papageorgiou, and I. Obata, Axion-Gauge Dynamics During Inflation as the Origin of Pulsar Timing Array Signals and Primordial Black Holes , arXiv:2307.0232

  60. [80]

    K. D. Lozanov, S. Pi, M. Sasaki, V. Takhistov, and A. Wang, Axion Universal Gravitational Wave Interpretation of Pulsar Timing Array Data , arXiv:2310.0359

  61. [81]

    Bartolo, S

    N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese, and A. Riotto, Nongaussianity from inflation , Phys. Rev. D65 (2002) 103505, [ hep-ph/0112261]

    2002 arXiv

  62. [82]

    Bartolo, E

    N. Bartolo, E. Komatsu, S. Matarrese, and A. Riotto, Non-Gaussianity from inflation: Theory and observations , Phys. Rept. 402 (2004) 103–266, [ astro-ph/0406398]

    2004 arXiv

  63. [83]

    Inomata and T

    K. Inomata and T. Nakama, Gravitational waves induced by scalar perturbations as probes of the small-scale primordial spectrum , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019), no. 4 043511, [arXiv:1812.0067]

    2019

  64. [84]

    Inomata, K

    K. Inomata, K. Kohri, and T. Terada, Detected stochastic gravitational waves and subsolar-mass primordial black holes , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 6 063506, [arXiv:2306.1783]

    2024

  65. [85]

    Bruni, S

    M. Bruni, S. Matarrese, S. Mollerach, and S. Sonego, Perturbations of space-time: Gauge transformations and gauge invariance at second order and beyond , Class.Quant.Grav. 14 (1997) 2585–2606, [ gr-qc/9609040]

    1997 arXiv

  66. [86]

    Carbone and S

    C. Carbone and S. Matarrese, A Unified treatment of cosmological perturbations from super-horizon to small scales , Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 043508, [ astro-ph/0407611]

    2005 arXiv

  67. [87]

    K. N. Ananda, C. Clarkson, and D. Wands, The Cosmological gravitational wave background from primordial density perturbations, Phys. Rev. D75 (2007) 123518, [ gr-qc/0612013]

    2007 arXiv

  68. [88]

    BAUMANN, INFLATION, pp

    D. BAUMANN, INFLATION, pp. 523–686. https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/9789814327183_0010

    doi

  69. [89]

    X. Gao, T. Kobayashi, M. Shiraishi, M. Yamaguchi, J. Yokoyama, and S. Yokoyama, Full bispectra from primordial scalar and tensor perturbations in the most general single-field inflation model, PTEP 2013 (2013) 053E03, [ arXiv:1207.0588]

    2013 arXiv

  70. [90]

    S. Pi, M. Sasaki, and Y.-l. Zhang, Primordial Tensor Perturbation in Double Inflationary Scenario with a Break , JCAP 06 (2019) 049, [ arXiv:1904.0630]

    2019

  71. [91]

    Akama, S

    S. Akama, S. Hirano, and T. Kobayashi, Primordial non-Gaussianities of scalar and tensor perturbations in general bounce cosmology: Evading the no-go theorem , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020), no. 4 043529, [ arXiv:1908.1066]

    2020

  72. [92]

    M. Zhu, A. Ilyas, Y. Zheng, Y.-F. Cai, and E. N. Saridakis, Scalar and tensor perturbations in DHOST bounce cosmology, JCAP 11 (2021), no. 11 045, [ arXiv:2108.0133]

    2021

  73. [93]

    Galloni, N

    G. Galloni, N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese, M. Migliaccio, A. Ricciardone, and N. Vittorio, Updated constraints on amplitude and tilt of the tensor primordial spectrum , JCAP 04 (2023) 062, [arXiv:2208.0018]

    2023

  74. [94]

    Matarrese, S

    S. Matarrese, S. Mollerach, and M. Bruni, Second order perturbations of the Einstein-de Sitter universe, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 043504, [ astro-ph/9707278]. – 25 –

    1998 arXiv

  75. [95]

    Acquaviva, N

    V. Acquaviva, N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese, and A. Riotto, Second order cosmological perturbations from inflation, Nucl. Phys. B667 (2003) 119–148, [ astro-ph/0209156]

    2003 arXiv

  76. [96]

    Bartolo, S

    N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese, and A. Riotto, Evolution of second - order cosmological perturbations and non-Gaussianity, JCAP 0401 (2004) 003, [ astro-ph/0309692]

    2004 arXiv

  77. [97]

    Vernizzi, On the conservation of second-order cosmological perturbations in a scalar field dominated Universe, Phys

    F. Vernizzi, On the conservation of second-order cosmological perturbations in a scalar field dominated Universe, Phys. Rev. D71 (2005) 061301, [ astro-ph/0411463]

    2005 arXiv

  78. [98]

    Nakamura, Second-order gauge invariant cosmological perturbation theory: Einstein equations in terms of gauge invariant variables , Prog

    K. Nakamura, Second-order gauge invariant cosmological perturbation theory: Einstein equations in terms of gauge invariant variables , Prog. Theor. Phys. 117 (2007) 17–74, [gr-qc/0605108]

    2007 arXiv

  79. [100]

    Inomata, E

    K. Inomata, E. McDonough, and W. Hu, Amplification of primordial perturbations from the rise or fall of the inflaton , JCAP 02 (2022), no. 02 031, [ arXiv:2110.1464]

    2022

  80. [101]

    Baumann, Cosmology

    D. Baumann, Cosmology. Cambridge University Press, 7, 2022

    2022

  81. [102]

    Dom` enech,Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review , Universe 7 (2021), no

    G. Dom` enech,Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review , Universe 7 (2021), no. 11 398, [arXiv:2109.0139]

    2021

  82. [103]

    Dandoy, V

    V. Dandoy, V. Domcke, and F. Rompineve, Search for scalar induced gravitational waves in the international pulsar timing array data release 2 and NANOgrav 12.5 years datasets , SciPost Phys. Core 6 (2023) 060, [ arXiv:2302.0790]

    2023

  83. [104]

    Kawasaki, N

    M. Kawasaki, N. Sugiyama, and T. Yanagida, Primordial black hole formation in a double inflation model in supergravity, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 6050–6056, [ hep-ph/9710259]

    1998 arXiv

  84. [105]

    Yokoyama, Chaotic new inflation and formation of primordial black holes , Phys

    J. Yokoyama, Chaotic new inflation and formation of primordial black holes , Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 083510, [ astro-ph/9802357]

    1998 arXiv

  85. [106]

    Kawasaki and T

    M. Kawasaki and T. Yanagida, Primordial black hole formation in supergravity , Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 043512, [ hep-ph/9807544]

    1999 arXiv

  86. [107]

    S. G. Rubin, A. S. Sakharov, and M. Y. Khlopov, The Formation of primary galactic nuclei during phase transitions in the early universe , J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 91 (2001) 921–929, [hep-ph/0106187]

    2001 arXiv

  87. [108]

    M. Y. Khlopov, S. G. Rubin, and A. S. Sakharov, Primordial structure of massive black hole clusters, Astropart. Phys. 23 (2005) 265, [ astro-ph/0401532]

    2005 arXiv

  88. [109]

    Saito, J

    R. Saito, J. Yokoyama, and R. Nagata, Single-field inflation, anomalous enhancement of superhorizon fluctuations, and non-Gaussianity in primordial black hole formation , JCAP 06 (2008) 024, [ arXiv:0804.3470]

    2008 arXiv

  89. [110]

    M. Y. Khlopov, Primordial Black Holes , Res. Astron. Astrophys. 10 (2010) 495–528, [arXiv:0801.0116]

    2010 arXiv

  90. [111]

    Drees and E

    M. Drees and E. Erfani, Running Spectral Index and Formation of Primordial Black Hole in Single Field Inflation Models , JCAP 01 (2012) 035, [ arXiv:1110.6052]

    2012 arXiv

  91. [112]

    Drees and E

    M. Drees and E. Erfani, Running-Mass Inflation Model and Primordial Black Holes , JCAP 04 (2011) 005, [ arXiv:1102.2340]

    2011 arXiv

  92. [113]

    J. M. Ezquiaga, J. Garcia-Bellido, and E. Ruiz Morales, Primordial Black Hole production in Critical Higgs Inflation , Phys. Lett. B 776 (2018) 345–349, [ arXiv:1705.0486]

    2018

  93. [114]

    Kannike, L

    K. Kannike, L. Marzola, M. Raidal, and H. Veerm¨ ae, Single Field Double Inflation and Primordial Black Holes , JCAP 09 (2017) 020, [ arXiv:1705.0622]

    2017

  94. [115]

    M. P. Hertzberg and M. Yamada, Primordial Black Holes from Polynomial Potentials in Single Field Inflation , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018), no. 8 083509, [ arXiv:1712.0975]. – 26 –

    2018

  95. [116]

    Pi, Y.-l

    S. Pi, Y.-l. Zhang, Q.-G. Huang, and M. Sasaki, Scalaron fromR2-gravity as a heavy field , JCAP 05 (2018) 042, [ arXiv:1712.0989]

    2018

  96. [117]

    Dalianis, A

    I. Dalianis, A. Kehagias, and G. Tringas, Primordial black holes from α-attractors, JCAP 01 (2019) 037, [ arXiv:1805.0948]

    2019

  97. [118]

    Cicoli, V

    M. Cicoli, V. A. Diaz, and F. G. Pedro, Primordial Black Holes from String Inflation , JCAP 06 (2018) 034, [ arXiv:1803.0283]

    2018

  98. [119]

    ¨Ozsoy, S

    O. ¨Ozsoy, S. Parameswaran, G. Tasinato, and I. Zavala, Mechanisms for Primordial Black Hole Production in String Theory , JCAP 07 (2018) 005, [ arXiv:1803.0762]

    2018

  99. [120]

    C. T. Byrnes, P. S. Cole, and S. P. Patil, Steepest growth of the power spectrum and primordial black holes , JCAP 06 (2019) 028, [ arXiv:1811.1115]

    2019

  100. [121]

    Ballesteros, J

    G. Ballesteros, J. Beltran Jimenez, and M. Pieroni, Black hole formation from a general quadratic action for inflationary primordial fluctuations , JCAP 06 (2019) 016, [arXiv:1811.0306]

    2019

  101. [122]

    K. M. Belotsky, V. I. Dokuchaev, Y. N. Eroshenko, E. A. Esipova, M. Y. Khlopov, L. A. Khromykh, A. A. Kirillov, V. V. Nikulin, S. G. Rubin, and I. V. Svadkovsky, Clusters of primordial black holes , Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019), no. 3 246, [ arXiv:1807.0659]

    2019

  102. [123]

    Martin, T

    J. Martin, T. Papanikolaou, and V. Vennin, Primordial black holes from the preheating instability in single-field inflation , JCAP 01 (2020) 024, [ arXiv:1907.0423]

    2020

  103. [124]

    J. M. Ezquiaga, J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, and V. Vennin, The exponential tail of inflationary fluctuations: consequences for primordial black holes , JCAP 03 (2020) 029, [arXiv:1912.0539]

    2020

  104. [125]

    C. Fu, P. Wu, and H. Yu, Primordial Black Holes from Inflation with Nonminimal Derivative Coupling, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019), no. 6 063532, [ arXiv:1907.0504]

    2019

  105. [126]

    Kawai and J

    S. Kawai and J. Kim, Primordial black holes from Gauss-Bonnet-corrected single field inflation, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 8 083545, [ arXiv:2108.0134]

    2021

  106. [127]

    Escriv` a, F

    A. Escriv` a, F. Kuhnel, and Y. Tada,Primordial Black Holes , arXiv:2211.0576

  107. [128]

    Kristiano and J

    J. Kristiano and J. Yokoyama, Constraining Primordial Black Hole Formation from Single-Field Inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024), no. 22 221003, [ arXiv:2211.0339]

    2024

  108. [129]

    Riotto, The Primordial Black Hole Formation from Single-Field Inflation is Not Ruled Out, arXiv:2301.0059

    A. Riotto, The Primordial Black Hole Formation from Single-Field Inflation is Not Ruled Out, arXiv:2301.0059

  109. [130]

    ¨Ozsoy and G

    O. ¨Ozsoy and G. Tasinato, Inflation and Primordial Black Holes , Universe 9 (2023), no. 5 203, [arXiv:2301.0360]

    2023

  110. [131]

    Choudhury and M

    S. Choudhury and M. Sami, Large fluctuations and primordial black holes , Phys. Rept. 1103 (2025) 1–276, [ arXiv:2407.1700]

    2025

  111. [132]

    Choudhury, M

    S. Choudhury, M. R. Gangopadhyay, and M. Sami, No-go for the formation of heavy mass primordial black holes in single field inflation , The European Physical Journal C 84 (Sept., 2024)

    2024

  112. [133]

    B. J. Carr, The Primordial black hole mass spectrum , Astrophys. J. 201 (1975) 1–19

    1975

  113. [134]

    B. J. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda, and J. Yokoyama, New cosmological constraints on primordial black holes , Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 104019, [ arXiv:0912.5297]

    2010 arXiv

  114. [135]

    B. Carr, F. Kuhnel, and M. Sandstad, Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016), no. 8 083504, [ arXiv:1607.0607]

    2016

  115. [136]

    Carr and J

    B. Carr and J. Silk, Primordial Black Holes as Generators of Cosmic Structures , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 478 (2018), no. 3 3756–3775, [ arXiv:1801.0067]. – 27 –

    2018

  116. [137]

    Sasaki, T

    M. Sasaki, T. Suyama, T. Tanaka, and S. Yokoyama, Primordial black holes—perspectives in gravitational wave astronomy, Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018), no. 6 063001, [arXiv:1801.0523]

    2018

  117. [138]

    S. W. Hawking, Particle Creation by Black Holes , Commun. Math. Phys. 43 (1975) 199–220. [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

    1975

  118. [139]

    B. J. Carr and S. W. Hawking, Black holes in the early Universe , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 168 (1974) 399–415

    1974

  119. [140]

    G. F. Chapline, Cosmological effects of primordial black holes , Nature 253 (1975), no. 5489 251–252

    1975

  120. [141]

    Yokoyama, Formation of primordial black holes in the inflationary universe , Phys

    J. Yokoyama, Formation of primordial black holes in the inflationary universe , Phys. Rept. 307 (1998) 133–139

    1998

  121. [142]

    J. C. Niemeyer and K. Jedamzik, Near-critical gravitational collapse and the initial mass function of primordial black holes , Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 5481–5484, [astro-ph/9709072]

    1998 arXiv

  122. [143]

    Musco, J

    I. Musco, J. C. Miller, and L. Rezzolla, Computations of primordial black hole formation , Class. Quant. Grav. 22 (2005) 1405–1424, [ gr-qc/0412063]

    2005 arXiv

  123. [144]

    B. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda, and J. Yokoyama, Constraints on primordial black holes , Rept. Prog. Phys. 84 (2021), no. 11 116902, [ arXiv:2002.1277]

    2021

  124. [145]

    Garc´ ıa-Bellido,Massive Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter and their detection with Gravitational Waves, J

    J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido,Massive Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter and their detection with Gravitational Waves, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 840 (2017), no. 1 012032, [ arXiv:1702.0827]

    2017

  125. [146]

    B. Carr, S. Clesse, J. Garcia-Bellido, M. Hawkins, and F. Kuhnel, Observational evidence for primordial black holes: A positivist perspective , Phys. Rept. 1054 (2024) 1–68, [arXiv:2306.0390]

    2024

  126. [147]

    Ivanov, P

    P. Ivanov, P. Naselsky, and I. Novikov, Inflation and primordial black holes as dark matter , Phys. Rev. D50 (1994) 7173–7178

    1994

  127. [148]

    Alcock et

    MACHO, EROS Collaboration, C. Alcock et. al., EROS and MACHO combined limits on planetary mass dark matter in the galactic halo , Astrophys. J. 499 (1998) L9, [astro-ph/9803082]

    1998 arXiv

  128. [149]

    Allsman et

    Macho Collaboration, R. Allsman et. al., MACHO project limits on black hole dark matter in the 1-30 solar mass range , Astrophys. J. Lett. 550 (2001) L169, [ astro-ph/0011506]

    2001 arXiv

  129. [150]

    Capela, M

    F. Capela, M. Pshirkov, and P. Tinyakov, Constraints on Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter Candidates from Star Formation , Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013), no. 2 023507, [arXiv:1209.6021]

    2013 arXiv

  130. [151]

    Capela, M

    F. Capela, M. Pshirkov, and P. Tinyakov, Constraints on primordial black holes as dark matter candidates from capture by neutron stars , Phys. Rev. D87 (2013), no. 12 123524, [arXiv:1301.4984]

    2013 arXiv

  131. [152]

    Griest, A

    K. Griest, A. M. Cieplak, and M. J. Lehner, New Limits on Primordial Black Hole Dark Matter from an Analysis of Kepler Source Microlensing Data , Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013), no. 18 181302

    2013

  132. [153]

    P. W. Graham, S. Rajendran, and J. Varela, Dark Matter Triggers of Supernovae , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015), no. 6 063007, [ arXiv:1505.0444]

    2015

  133. [154]

    Clesse and J

    S. Clesse and J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido,Massive Primordial Black Holes from Hybrid Inflation as Dark Matter and the seeds of Galaxies , Phys. Rev. D92 (2015), no. 2 023524, [ arXiv:1501.0756]

    2015

  134. [155]

    Clesse and J

    S. Clesse and J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido,The clustering of massive Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: measuring their mass distribution with Advanced LIGO , Phys. Dark Univ. 15 (2017) 142–147, [arXiv:1603.0523]. – 28 –

    2017

  135. [156]

    S. Bird, I. Cholis, J. B. Mu˜ noz, Y. Ali-Ha¨ ımoud, M. Kamionkowski, E. D. Kovetz, A. Raccanelli, and A. G. Riess, Did LIGO detect dark matter? , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016), no. 20 201301, [ arXiv:1603.0046]

    2016

  136. [157]

    Chen, Q.-G

    L. Chen, Q.-G. Huang, and K. Wang, Constraint on the abundance of primordial black holes in dark matter from Planck data , JCAP 12 (2016) 044, [ arXiv:1608.0217]

    2016

  137. [158]

    Aloni, K

    D. Aloni, K. Blum, and R. Flauger, Cosmic microwave background constraints on primordial black hole dark matter , JCAP 05 (2017) 017, [ arXiv:1612.0681]

    2017

  138. [159]

    L. A. Ure˜ na L´ opez,Scalar fields in Cosmology: dark matter and inflation , J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 761 (2016), no. 1 012076

    2016

  139. [160]

    Ballesteros and M

    G. Ballesteros and M. Taoso, Primordial black hole dark matter from single field inflation , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018), no. 2 023501, [ arXiv:1709.0556]

    2018

  140. [161]

    Garcia-Bellido, M

    J. Garcia-Bellido, M. Peloso, and C. Unal, Gravitational Wave signatures of inflationary models from Primordial Black Hole Dark Matter , JCAP 1709 (2017), no. 09 013, [arXiv:1707.0244]

    2017

  141. [162]

    Inomata, M

    K. Inomata, M. Kawasaki, K. Mukaida, Y. Tada, and T. T. Yanagida, Inflationary Primordial Black Holes as All Dark Matter , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017), no. 4 043504, [ arXiv:1701.0254]

    2017

  142. [163]

    Griest, A

    K. Griest, A. M. Cieplak, and M. J. Lehner, New limits on primordial black hole dark matter from an analysis of kepler source microlensing data , Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (Oct, 2013) 181302

    2013

  143. [164]

    Bartolo, V

    N. Bartolo, V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, A. Lewis, M. Peloso, and A. Riotto, Primordial Black Hole Dark Matter: LISA Serendipity , Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019), no. 21 211301, [arXiv:1810.1221]

    2019

  144. [165]

    Bartolo, V

    N. Bartolo, V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, M. Peloso, D. Racco, and A. Riotto, Testing primordial black holes as dark matter with LISA , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019), no. 10 103521, [arXiv:1810.1222]

    2019

  145. [166]

    A. Katz, J. Kopp, S. Sibiryakov, and W. Xue, Femtolensing by Dark Matter Revisited , JCAP 1812 (2018) 005, [ arXiv:1807.1149]

    2018

  146. [167]

    Maity and P

    D. Maity and P. Saha, CMB constraints on dark matter phenomenology via reheating in Minimal plateau inflation , Phys. Dark Univ. 25 (2019) 100317, [ arXiv:1804.1011]

    2019

  147. [168]

    Bhaumik and R

    N. Bhaumik and R. K. Jain, Primordial black holes dark matter from inflection point models of inflation and the effects of reheating , JCAP 01 (2020) 037, [ arXiv:1907.0412]

    2020

  148. [169]

    Montero-Camacho, X

    P. Montero-Camacho, X. Fang, G. Vasquez, M. Silva, and C. M. Hirata, Revisiting constraints on asteroid-mass primordial black holes as dark matter candidates , JCAP 1908 (2019) 031, [arXiv:1906.0595]

    2019

  149. [170]

    Dasgupta, R

    B. Dasgupta, R. Laha, and A. Ray, Neutrino and positron constraints on spinning primordial black hole dark matter , Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020), no. 10 101101, [ arXiv:1912.0101]

    2020

  150. [171]

    Laha, Primordial Black Holes as a Dark Matter Candidate Are Severely Constrained by the Galactic Center 511 keV γ -Ray Line, Phys

    R. Laha, Primordial Black Holes as a Dark Matter Candidate Are Severely Constrained by the Galactic Center 511 keV γ -Ray Line, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019), no. 25 251101, [arXiv:1906.0999]

    2019

  151. [172]

    R. Laha, J. B. Mu˜ noz, and T. R. Slatyer, INTEGRAL constraints on primordial black holes and particle dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020), no. 12 123514, [ arXiv:2004.0062]

    2020

  152. [173]

    A. M. Green and B. J. Kavanagh, Primordial Black Holes as a dark matter candidate , arXiv:2007.1072

    2007

  153. [174]

    Jedamzik, Evidence for primordial black hole dark matter from LIGO/Virgo merger rates , arXiv:2007.0356

    K. Jedamzik, Evidence for primordial black hole dark matter from LIGO/Virgo merger rates , arXiv:2007.0356

    2007

  154. [175]

    Jedamzik, Primordial Black Hole Dark Matter and the LIGO/Virgo observations , arXiv:2006.1117

    K. Jedamzik, Primordial Black Hole Dark Matter and the LIGO/Virgo observations , arXiv:2006.1117. – 29 –

    2006

  155. [176]

    Carr and F

    B. Carr and F. Kuhnel, Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments , Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 70 (2020) 355–394, [ arXiv:2006.0283]

    2020

  156. [177]

    De Luca, G

    V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, and A. Riotto, NANOGrav Data Hints at Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter , Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021), no. 4 041303, [ arXiv:2009.0826]

    2021

  157. [178]

    Animali and V

    C. Animali and V. Vennin, Primordial black holes from stochastic tunnelling , JCAP 02 (2023) 043, [arXiv:2210.0381]

    2023

  158. [179]

    Motohashi and W

    H. Motohashi and W. Hu, Primordial Black Holes and Slow-Roll Violation , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017), no. 6 063503, [ arXiv:1706.0678]

    2017

  159. [180]

    Cai, X.-H

    Y.-F. Cai, X.-H. Ma, M. Sasaki, D.-G. Wang, and Z. Zhou, One small step for an inflaton, one giant leap for inflation: A novel non-Gaussian tail and primordial black holes , Phys. Lett. B 834 (2022) 137461, [ arXiv:2112.1383]

    2022

  160. [181]

    Boutivas, I

    K. Boutivas, I. Dalianis, G. P. Kodaxis, and N. Tetradis, The effect of multiple features on the power spectrum in two-field inflation , JCAP 08 (2022), no. 08 021, [ arXiv:2203.1560]

    2022

  161. [182]

    Aldabergenov, A

    Y. Aldabergenov, A. Addazi, and S. V. Ketov, Testing Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter in Supergravity from Gravitational Waves , Phys. Lett. B 814 (2021) 136069, [arXiv:2008.1047]

    2021

  162. [183]

    Kanazawa, M

    T. Kanazawa, M. Kawasaki, and T. Yanagida, Double inflation in supergravity and the primordial black hole formation , Phys. Lett. B 482 (2000) 174–182, [ hep-ph/0002236]

    2000 arXiv

  163. [184]

    A. Y. Kamenshchik, A. Tronconi, T. Vardanyan, and G. Venturi, Non-Canonical Inflation and Primordial Black Holes Production , Phys. Lett. B791 (2019) 201–205, [ arXiv:1812.0254]

    2019

  164. [185]

    Q. Gao, Y. Gong, and Z. Yi, Primordial black holes and secondary gravitational waves from natural inflation, Nucl. Phys. B 969 (2021) 115480, [ arXiv:2012.0385]

    2021

  165. [186]

    J. Lin, Q. Gao, Y. Gong, Y. Lu, C. Zhang, and F. Zhang, Primordial black holes and secondary gravitational waves from k and G inflation, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020), no. 10 103515, [arXiv:2001.0590]

    2020

  166. [187]

    S. M. Leach, I. J. Grivell, and A. R. Liddle, Black hole constraints on the running mass inflation model, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 043516, [ astro-ph/0004296]

    2000 arXiv

  167. [188]

    Balaji, G

    S. Balaji, G. Dom` enech, and G. Franciolini, Scalar-induced gravitational wave interpretation of PTA data: the role of scalar fluctuation propagation speed , JCAP 10 (2023) 041, [arXiv:2307.0855]

    2023

  168. [189]

    M. A. Gorji, M. Sasaki, and T. Suyama, Extra-tensor-induced origin for the PTA signal: No primordial black hole production , Phys. Lett. B 846 (2023) 138214, [ arXiv:2307.1310]

    2023

  169. [190]

    Garcia-Bellido and E

    J. Garcia-Bellido and E. Ruiz Morales, Primordial black holes from single field models of inflation, Phys. Dark Univ. 18 (2017) 47–54, [ arXiv:1702.0390]

    2017

  170. [191]

    Heydari and K

    S. Heydari and K. Karami, Primordial black holes generated by fast-roll mechanism in non-canonical natural inflation, arXiv:2405.0856

  171. [192]

    H. V. Ragavendra, P. Saha, L. Sriramkumar, and J. Silk, Primordial black holes and secondary gravitational waves from ultraslow roll and punctuated inflation , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021), no. 8 083510, [ arXiv:2008.1220]

    2021

  172. [193]

    Arya, Formation of Primordial Black Holes from Warm Inflation , JCAP 09 (2020) 042, [arXiv:1910.0523]

    R. Arya, Formation of Primordial Black Holes from Warm Inflation , JCAP 09 (2020) 042, [arXiv:1910.0523]

    2020

  173. [194]

    Bastero-Gil and M

    M. Bastero-Gil and M. S. D´ ıaz-Blanco,Gravity waves and primordial black holes in scalar warm little inflation , JCAP 12 (2021), no. 12 052, [ arXiv:2105.0804]

    2021

  174. [195]

    Sugimura, D

    K. Sugimura, D. Yamauchi, and M. Sasaki, Multi-field open inflation model and multi-field dynamics in tunneling , Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2012 (Jan., 2012) 027–027. – 30 –

    2012

  175. [196]

    Sasaki, Multi-brid inflation and non-gaussianity , Progress of Theoretical Physics 120 (July, 2008) 159–174

    M. Sasaki, Multi-brid inflation and non-gaussianity , Progress of Theoretical Physics 120 (July, 2008) 159–174

    2008

  176. [197]

    Germani and T

    C. Germani and T. Prokopec, On primordial black holes from an inflection point , Phys. Dark Univ. 18 (2017) 6–10, [ arXiv:1706.0422]

    2017

  177. [198]

    Kefala, G

    K. Kefala, G. P. Kodaxis, I. D. Stamou, and N. Tetradis, Features of the inflaton potential and the power spectrum of cosmological perturbations , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 2 023506, [arXiv:2010.1248]

    2021

  178. [199]

    Inomata, E

    K. Inomata, E. McDonough, and W. Hu, Primordial black holes arise when the inflaton falls , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 12 123553, [ arXiv:2104.0397]

    2021

  179. [200]

    S. S. Mishra and V. Sahni, Primordial Black Holes from a tiny bump/dip in the Inflaton potential, JCAP 04 (2020) 007, [ arXiv:1911.0005]

    2020

  180. [201]

    Zheng and T

    R. Zheng and T. Q. Shi, Jiaming and, On primordial black holes and secondary gravitational waves generated from inflation with solo/multi-bumpy potential * , Chin. Phys. C 46 (2022), no. 4 045103, [ arXiv:2106.0430]

    2022

  181. [202]

    Dimopoulos, Ultra slow-roll inflation demystified , Phys

    K. Dimopoulos, Ultra slow-roll inflation demystified , Phys. Lett. B 775 (2017) 262–265, [arXiv:1707.0564]

    2017

  182. [203]

    Y.-P. Wu, E. Pinetti, K. Petraki, and J. Silk, Baryogenesis from ultra-slow-roll inflation , JHEP 01 (2022) 015, [ arXiv:2109.0011]

    2022

  183. [204]

    Kristiano and J

    J. Kristiano and J. Yokoyama, Generating large primordial fluctuations in single-field inflation for PBH formation , arXiv:2405.1214

  184. [206]

    Ng and Y.-P

    K.-W. Ng and Y.-P. Wu, Constant-rate inflation: primordial black holes from conformal weight transitions, JHEP 11 (2021) 076, [ arXiv:2102.0562]

    2021

  185. [207]

    Cheng, W

    S.-L. Cheng, W. Lee, and K.-W. Ng, Superhorizon curvature perturbation in ultraslow-roll inflation, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019), no. 6 063524, [ arXiv:1811.1010]

    2019

  186. [208]

    Karam, N

    A. Karam, N. Koivunen, E. Tomberg, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veerm¨ ae, Anatomy of single-field inflationary models for primordial black holes , JCAP 03 (2023) 013, [ arXiv:2205.1354]

    2023

  187. [209]

    D. K. Hazra, L. Sriramkumar, and J. Martin, BINGO: A code for the efficient computation of the scalar bi-spectrum, JCAP 05 (2013) 026, [ arXiv:1201.0926]

    2013 arXiv

  188. [210]

    Kohri and T

    K. Kohri and T. Terada, Semianalytic calculation of gravitational wave spectrum nonlinearly induced from primordial curvature perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018), no. 12 123532, [arXiv:1804.0857]

    2018

  189. [211]

    Yi, Z.-Q

    Z. Yi, Z.-Q. You, and Y. Wu, Model-independent reconstruction of the primordial curvature power spectrum from PTA data , JCAP 01 (2024) 066, [ arXiv:2308.0563]

    2024

  190. [212]

    Yu and S

    Y.-H. Yu and S. Wang, Primordial Gravitational Waves Assisted by Cosmological Scalar Perturbations, arXiv:2303.0389

  191. [213]

    M. R. Gangopadhyay, J. C. Jain, D. Sharma, and Yogesh, Production of primordial black holes via single field inflation and observational constraints , Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022), no. 9 849, [arXiv:2108.1383]

    2022

  192. [214]

    A. M. Green, A. R. Liddle, K. A. Malik, and M. Sasaki, A New calculation of the mass fraction of primordial black holes , Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 041502, [ astro-ph/0403181]

    2004 arXiv

  193. [215]

    B. J. Carr, The primordial black hole mass spectrum. , apj 201 (Oct., 1975) 1–19. – 31 –

    1975

  194. [216]

    Niikura et

    H. Niikura et. al., Microlensing constraints on primordial black holes with Subaru/HSC Andromeda observations, Nature Astron. 3 (2019), no. 6 524–534, [ arXiv:1701.0215]

    2019

  195. [217]

    Niikura, M

    H. Niikura, M. Takada, S. Yokoyama, T. Sumi, and S. Masaki, Constraints on Earth-mass primordial black holes from OGLE 5-year microlensing events , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019), no. 8 083503, [arXiv:1901.0712]

    2019

  196. [218]

    Tisserand et

    EROS-2 Collaboration, P. Tisserand et. al., Limits on the Macho Content of the Galactic Halo from the EROS-2 Survey of the Magellanic Clouds , Astron. Astrophys. 469 (2007) 387–404, [astro-ph/0607207]

    2007 arXiv

  197. [219]

    Griest, A

    K. Griest, A. M. Cieplak, and M. J. Lehner, Experimental Limits on Primordial Black Hole Dark Matter from the First 2 yr of Kepler Data , Astrophys. J. 786 (2014), no. 2 158, [arXiv:1307.5798]

    2014 arXiv

  198. [220]

    Ali-Ha¨ ımoud and M

    Y. Ali-Ha¨ ımoud and M. Kamionkowski,Cosmic microwave background limits on accreting primordial black holes , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017), no. 4 043534, [ arXiv:1612.0564]

    2017

  199. [221]

    Chen and Q.-G

    Z.-C. Chen and Q.-G. Huang, Distinguishing Primordial Black Holes from Astrophysical Black Holes by Einstein Telescope and Cosmic Explorer , JCAP 08 (2020) 039, [ arXiv:1904.0239]

    2020

  200. [222]

    Z.-C. Chen, C. Yuan, and Q.-G. Huang, Pulsar Timing Array Constraints on Primordial Black Holes with NANOGrav 11-Year Dataset , Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020), no. 25 251101, [arXiv:1910.1223]

    2020

  201. [223]

    Lu and Y.-L

    B.-Q. Lu and Y.-L. Wu, Constraining primordial black holes in dark matter with kinematics of dwarf galaxies, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019), no. 12 123023, [ arXiv:1906.1046]. – 32 –

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.