Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 34 references

Cosmic strings in the complex symmetron model

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The complex symmetron model's screening mechanism makes cosmic strings pin to matter halos, stabilizing loops and string-anti-string pairs that would otherwise annihilate.

desk verdict Simulations show complex symmetron strings pinning to halos and stabilizing loops; the physics is an extension of known domain-wall pinning, and the paper's evidence is adequate for a qualitative claim though the numerics need validation. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.19830 v2 pith:LF3HXJHZ submitted 2025-04-28 hep-ph astro-ph.COgr-qchep-th

Ali Nezhadsafavi , Levon Pogosian This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.COgr-qchep-th
keywords cosmicstringscomplexsymmetronmodelscreeningmechanismtopologicaldefectsscalar-tensorgravityfifthforcestringloopsdarksector
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that cosmic strings in the complex symmetron model, a scalar-tensor theory in which a local U(1) symmetry breaks only in low-density regions, do not behave like ordinary strings. Using numerical simulations, it shows that strings preferentially attach to matter halos, because the same screening that suppresses fifth forces in dense environments also reduces the string's energy inside the halo. The consequence is that string loops, which would normally shrink and radiate away, and string-anti-string pairs, which would normally annihilate, can be stabilized by pinning to halos. The paper's broader point is that topological defects in screened scalar-tensor theories acquire environment-dependent dynamics, and that analogous defects confined to the dark sector could leave traces in cosmic structure even though universal-coupling symmetron strings are too light to observe.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the symmetron screening mechanism in the complex field extension: the effective potential $V_{\rm eff} = \frac{1}{2}(\rho/M^2 - \mu^2)|\phi|^2 + \frac{\lambda}{4}|\phi|^4$ has a $U(1)$-symmetric minimum when the matter density $\rho$ exceeds $\rho_c = \mu^2 M^2$, so the scalar VEV and the fifth force vanish in dense regions. Strings enter through the Nielsen-Olesen ansatz for the complex scalar and gauge fields, with BPS parameters making the scalar and gauge cores equal in width. The argument is carried by the energy identity $E = \mu_s L - N \mu_s \ell$, which says that each halo threaded by the string removes a segment of length $\ell$ from the energy budget; minimizing the string length outside halos is then the same as minimizing the energy. This converts the field-theory question of whether strings attach to halos into a geometric minimization problem.

What would settle it

Repeat the loop and pair simulations with the string and halo placed progressively closer together at initialization, or with the boundary transition function made much wider, and check whether pinning disappears; if the stabilized configurations only appear with the composite initial data at large separation, the claim would not hold. A direct calculation of the energy of a static string segment threaded through a halo, solving the full coupled field equations instead of using the approximate product ansatz, would also settle whether the energy reduction $E = \mu_s L - N \mu_s \ell$ is real.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in the complex symmetron model, screening makes matter halos attract and pin cosmic strings. When the thin-shell condition holds, the scalar field vanishes inside a dense halo, matching the field in the string core, so a segment of string threaded through a halo contributes almost no energy. For a loop of invariant length L passing through N halos, with length ell inside each halo, the energy is E = \mu_s L - N \mu_s \ell, so the loop settles into a configuration that minimizes the length lying outside halos. The paper reports simulations in a $400^{3}$ periodic box, using Crank-Nicholson evolution and Nielsen-Olesen initial profiles, in which a string-anti-string pair moving at v=0.5 annihilates without halos but remains pinned and stationary with ten halos in place, and a circular loop that would collapse and decay is held stable by eight halos arranged in a ring. This is presented as confirmation that loops and pairs can be stabilized by halo attachment, with the caveat that stabilization depends on halo number, spacing, and the kinetic energy of unpinned segments.

Load-bearing premise

The composite initial configurations are built by multiplying an isolated halo profile by an isolated string profile and smoothing the fields near the box boundaries; the argument assumes the spurious gradients this creates are small and radiate away before the string and halo interact, so the observed pinning reflects real dynamics rather than the initial data.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the complex symmetron model, cosmic string loops that would otherwise collapse can survive when enough matter halos are present along their path.
  • String-anti-string pairs moving toward each other can be halted and held as stable, stationary configurations when halos lie on their trajectory.
  • The stabilizing effect only operates under the thin-shell condition; halos that are too small, too diffuse, or too weakly coupled will not pin strings.
  • For a symmetron with universal matter coupling, screening constraints keep string tensions so small that their gravitational effects are negligible, but the same pinning physics in a dark-sector version could imprint on dark matter structure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This suggests that in dark-sector versions with heavier strings, halo pinning could produce long-lived loops that act as dark-matter substructures or seed density perturbations around halos; the paper mentions the dark-sector possibility but does not model it.
  • The energy identity resembles vortex pinning in superfluids and superconductors, so quantitative predictions for loop survival could be borrowed from condensed-matter pinning theory, an analogy the paper draws only qualitatively.
  • A testable extension would be to map the pinning threshold in parameter space, finding the minimal halo mass and number needed to stabilize a loop of given tension, which could be done with the same simulation code.
  • If stabilization biases loop populations toward high-density regions, the string network's late-time behavior would differ from the standard scaling solution, changing gravitational-wave or lensing signatures; this is not computed in the paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies cosmic strings in a complexified symmetron model with a local U(1) gauge symmetry, in which the scalar field is non-minimally coupled to matter. It constructs Nielsen-Olesen string solutions, circular string loops, and matter halo profiles, and evolves them numerically in a 400^3 periodic box. The central claim is that strings preferentially attach to matter halos because the symmetron screening mechanism suppresses the string energy inside high-density regions, and that this pinning can stabilize otherwise collapsing loops or annihilating string-anti-string pairs. The paper presents two simulations, one of a string-anti-string pair with ten halos and one of a loop with eight halos, alongside no-halo control runs, and supports the mechanism with a Nambu-Goto energy argument. It concludes that such defects may be more phenomenologically relevant in a dark-sector version of the model.

Significance. If the numerical result is robust, the paper identifies a genuinely new behavior for symmetron cosmic strings: screening by matter halos acts as a pinning mechanism, analogous to vortex pinning in superfluids and domain-wall pinning in ferromagnets. This would extend the known phenomenology of symmetron domain walls to line defects and could have consequences for dark-sector models where the constraint from solar-system tests is relaxed. The paper is clearly written and the Nambu-Goto energy argument in Eq. (24) provides a simple, plausible heuristic for why pinning is energetically favorable. However, the central evidence is purely numerical, and the manuscript currently lacks the validation (convergence tests, quantitative diagnostics, and checks of the composite initial data) needed to establish that the observed pinning is a genuine dynamical effect rather than an artifact of the initial configuration. With that validation supplied, the result would be a solid contribution to the modified-gravity and topological-defect literature.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III.C, Eq. (23)] The composite initial data constructed by multiplying the isolated halo profile phi_m(r) with the isolated string/loop profile and adding the gauge fields is a central load-bearing assumption, but it is not validated. The text asserts that residual field gradients from the product ansatz 'radiate away before the string and the halo get close,' yet no quantitative estimate, convergence check in the initial separation, or comparison with an alternative initialization is provided. The no-halo controls share the same boundary smoothing, so they isolate boundary effects, but they do not isolate the halo-dependent modulation of the string profile introduced by the product ansatz itself. If the transient radiation from this initial mismatch interacts with the halos on the approach timescale, the observed pinning could be an artifact of the initial data rather than the physical screening mechanism. Please provide a diagnostic (e.g., measure the radiated energy and the residual field gradients as a function of initial separation, or evolve a relaxed combined solution) to demonstrate that the result is independent of the initialization procedure.
  2. [Section IV] The only numerical accuracy check reported is global energy conservation at the 'better than 5%' level, which is insufficient to support the qualitative claims for two reasons. First, 5% energy violation does not rule out a spurious momentum kick or localized radiation that could bias string-halo interactions, especially given the long evolution times shown in Figs. 2 and 3. Second, no convergence study is presented for the symmetron model; the reference to tests in [25] applies to the Abelian-Higgs model, not to the new matter-coupling and screening terms. Please add a resolution study (varying the lattice spacing and timestep) and, ideally, a box-size study, and quantify the energy conservation error as a function of resolution.
  3. [Section IV, Figs. 2-3] The claim that strings are 'stabilized' needs a quantitative definition. The figures show a few snapshots, but there is no measurement of how long the configurations persist, no time-dependent diagnostic of the string position relative to the halos, and no measure of pinning strength or binding energy. Without such a criterion, the distinction between genuine stabilization and a long-lived transient is unclear. Please report, for example, the string length inside and outside the halos as a function of time, the kinetic energy of unpinned segments, and the total simulation time compared to the characteristic collapse/annihilation timescale in the no-halo controls.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section IV] The parameters listed in the text are inconsistent with those in Fig. 3: the text states eta = 1.0 for all simulations, while the Fig. 3 caption reports eta = 0.5. Please correct this and state clearly which value was used for the loop simulation.
  2. [Eqs. (17)-(18)] The definition of the transition function is hard to parse: the expression for Re(tilde Phi) contains a square root with Im(tilde Phi) on the right-hand side, but Im(tilde Phi) is itself defined by the transition function. Please rewrite this in a less ambiguous form and specify the domain of r and the units of r0 and w.
  3. [Section IV] The parenthetical '8 (24) lattice points inside the thin-shell' is unclear: does the first number refer to the straight-string runs and the second to the loop runs, or the reverse? Please spell this out.
  4. [Section III.C] The statement that the initial separation need only be 'a couple of string core sizes' is too vague, since the halo profile extends far beyond the core and the loop has a finite radius. Please quote the actual initial separations used in the simulations in units of the string core radius.
  5. [Section II.A] The notation in Eq. (11), 's.t. vector A = phi-hat A_phi/r', is ambiguous; please define A_phi explicitly and specify the vector direction of vector A in cylindrical coordinates.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the pinning result is a numerical observation supported by control simulations and an independent energy heuristic; self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain, the paper's central claim—that complex symmetron strings attach to halos and that this stabilizes otherwise collapsing loops—is established by direct numerical evolution of Eqs. (5)-(6), not by fitting a parameter to the outcome. The initial configurations (Eq. 23) combine separately relaxed string and halo solutions at large separation; the no-halo control runs in Figs. 2 and 3 use the same boundary smoothing and show annihilation, so the pinning is not encoded in the boundary treatment or in the transition function. The energy argument in Eq. (24) is a post-hoc heuristic that explains the energetics via the model's screening mechanism (the effective potential minimum is zero when rho > rho_c); it is not used to construct the initial data or to relabel simulation output as a prediction. The self-citations to [16] and [25] are used only for motivation, parameter conventions, and numerical-method validation; the present paper independently tests energy conservation to better than 5% and presents control simulations. The product ansatz of Eq. (23) involves an unverified but explicitly stated approximation that residual gradients radiate away; this is a numerical/correctness risk, not a circular reduction of the result to its inputs. Accordingly, no circular step meeting the quoted-evidence standard is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 13 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results are numerical demonstrations; the only inputs are model parameters chosen for BPS and numerical convenience, halo profile parameters, and simulation settings. The main physical assumption is that screened halos restore the symmetron VEV to zero, rendering embedded string segments nearly massless. Several numerical implementation choices, especially the composite initial condition and boundary smoothing, are ad hoc to this paper. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (13)
  • eta (symmetron VEV) = 1.0 (code units)
    Set to 1.0 in all runs to fix the string tension scale in the BPS limit; not fitted to data.
  • q (gauge coupling) = 1.0
    Chosen with lambda and eta to satisfy the BPS condition rs=rv.
  • lambda (quartic coupling) = 0.5
    Chosen for BPS limit and numerical convenience; sets the scalar mass.
  • M (matter coupling scale) = 0.5
    Chosen so halos satisfy the thin-shell condition with the chosen kappa profile.
  • kappa (halo amplitude, straight-string runs) = 3.0
    Sets the central matter density; chosen with M to make screening effective.
  • nu (halo steepness, straight-string runs) = 30.0
    Controls the width of the halo transition; chosen for thin shells.
  • chi (halo radius, straight-string runs) = 2.5
    Sets halo size; selected to satisfy the thin-shell condition.
  • kappa (halo amplitude, loop runs) = 3.0
    Same amplitude used in loop simulations with wider, softer halos.
  • nu (halo steepness, loop runs) = 10.0
    Smaller steepness than straight-string runs, giving more extended halos.
  • chi (halo radius, loop runs) = 8.0
    Larger halo radius used to pin the loop.
  • initial string velocity v = 0.5
    Imparted to speed up annihilation; arbitrary choice for the demonstration.
  • lattice spacing Delta x = 0.5
    Chosen for about 10 lattice points inside the string core.
  • cosmological inputs for tension estimate (beta, a_SSB, lambda0) = beta=1, a_SSB=0.5, lambda0=0.1 Mpc
    Illustrative values used to estimate G mu about 1e-18; not fitted to the simulation outcome.
assumptions (8)
  • standard math Nielsen-Olesen string solutions exist for a spontaneously broken local U(1) symmetry with nontrivial first homotopy group of the vacuum manifold.
    Invoked in Section II.A to justify the ansatz (Eqs. 10-11).
  • standard math In the BPS limit rs=rv, with scalar and gauge masses given by Eqs. (12)-(13).
    Used to set simulation parameters and string core sizes; standard vortex results from [22,23].
  • domain assumption Thin-shell condition rho R^2 / M^2 >> 1 guarantees screening inside a spherical halo.
    Used throughout to argue the field vanishes inside halos; Eq. (9).
  • domain assumption All matter can be treated as dust, so the scalar field couples only to rho, not to the full stress-energy trace.
    Stated in footnote 1 and used in Eq. (5).
  • ad hoc to paper The composite initial field Phi = phi_m Phi_string / eta (Eq. 23) is close enough to a true solution at large separation that residual gradients radiate away before interaction.
    Assumed in Section III.C; no quantitative estimate of the error is given.
  • ad hoc to paper Boundary transition functions (Eqs. 17-18) suppress phase and gauge-field boundary artifacts without qualitatively changing string dynamics inside the box.
    Introduced in Section III.A; the authors state a small amount of radiation is generated but does not affect qualitative features.
  • standard math The iterated Crank-Nicholson method with two iterations is stable and adequate for these field equations.
    Numerical scheme adopted from [24,25]; no independent stability analysis for this model is provided in the paper.
  • ad hoc to paper Periodic boundary conditions can be satisfied by using a string-anti-string pair plus a transition function masking the phase.
    Construction in Section III.A; the boundary treatment is specific to this simulation setup.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cosmic strings in the complex symmetron model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LF3HXJHZ

@misc{pith2026250419830,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cosmic strings in the complex symmetron model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LF3HXJHZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.19830}
}
abstract

We study cosmic strings in the complex symmetron model, a scalar-tensor theory with a spontaneously broken local $U(1)$ symmetry in low matter density regions. Using numerical simulations, we show that these strings preferentially attach to matter halos, leading to the stabilization of string loops. While the requirement for screening of fifth-force interactions in the solar system limits observable signatures in theories with universal coupling to matter, analogous topological defects in the dark sector may still influence cosmic structure formation, offering a novel avenue to constrain dark-sector interactions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.19830 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Poloidal-toroidal coordinate system. The coordinate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Top: A pair of a string and an anti-string shown at four time snapshots: at the beginning, as they approach the mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Top: A circular loop with eight mass halos arranged in a ring is shown at four time snapshots: initially, just before [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. A schematic illustration of how unpinned segments [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [25]

    Matsunami, L

    D. Matsunami, L. Pogosian, A. Saurabh, and T. Vachas- pati, Decay of Cosmic String Loops Due to Parti- cle Radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 201301 (2019), arXiv:1903.05102 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2019

  2. [1]

    Vilenkin and E

    A. Vilenkin and E. P. S. Shellard, Cosmic Strings and Other Topological Defects (Cambridge University Press, 2000)

    2000

  3. [2]

    Perlmutter and A

    S. Perlmutter and A. Riess, Cosmological parameters from supernovae: Two groups’ results agree, AIP Conf. Proc. 478, 129 (1999)

    work page 1999

  4. [3]

    A. G. Riess, P. Nugent, A. V. Filippenko, R. P. Kirshner, and S. Perlmutter, Snapshot distances to type Ia Super- novae: All in ’one’ night’s work, Astrophys. J. 504, 935 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9804065

    work page Pith review arXiv 1998

  5. [4]

    Khoury and A

    J. Khoury and A. Weltman, Chameleon fields: Awaiting surprises for tests of gravity in space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 171104 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0309300

    arXiv 2004

  6. [5]

    Hinterbichler and J

    K. Hinterbichler and J. Khoury, Symmetron Fields: Screening Long-Range Forces Through Local Symme- try Restoration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 231301 (2010), arXiv:1001.4525 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2010

  7. [6]

    A. I. Vainshtein, To the problem of nonvanishing gravi- tation mass, Phys. Lett. B 39, 393 (1972)

    1972

  8. [7]

    Babichev, C

    E. Babichev, C. Deffayet, and R. Ziour, k-Mouflage gravity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 18, 2147 (2009), arXiv:0905.2943 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2009

Show all 34 references
  1. [8]

    Joyce, B

    A. Joyce, B. Jain, J. Khoury, and M. Trodden, Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model, Phys. Rept. 568, 1 (2015), arXiv:1407.0059 [astro-ph.CO]

    2015 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Weinberg, The Cosmological Constant Problem, Rev

    S. Weinberg, The Cosmological Constant Problem, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 1 (1989)

    1989

  3. [10]

    Padmanabhan, Cosmological constant: The Weight of the vacuum, Phys

    T. Padmanabhan, Cosmological constant: The Weight of the vacuum, Phys. Rept. 380, 235 (2003), arXiv:hep- th/0212290

    2003

  4. [11]

    Brax, A.-C

    P. Brax, A.-C. Davis, B. Li, H. A. Winther, and G.-B. Zhao, Systematic Simulations of Modified Grav- ity: Symmetron and Dilaton Models, JCAP 10, 002, arXiv:1206.3568 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  5. [12]

    Hojjati, A

    A. Hojjati, A. Plahn, A. Zucca, L. Pogosian, P. Brax, A.-C. Davis, and G.-B. Zhao, Searching for scalar grav- itational interactions in current and future cosmological data, Phys. Rev. D 93, 043531 (2016), arXiv:1511.05962 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Fischer, C

    H. Fischer, C. K¨ ading, and M. Pitschmann, Screened Scalar Fields in the Laboratory and the Solar System, Universe 10, 297 (2024), arXiv:2405.14638 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Llinares and D

    C. Llinares and D. Mota, Releasing scalar fields: cosmo- logical simulations of scalar-tensor theories for gravity beyond the static approximation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 161101 (2013), arXiv:1302.1774 [astro-ph.CO]

    2013 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Llinares and D

    C. Llinares and D. F. Mota, Cosmological simulations of screened modified gravity out of the static approxima- tion: effects on matter distribution, Phys. Rev. D 89, 084023 (2014), arXiv:1312.6016 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Llinares and L

    C. Llinares and L. Pogosian, Domain walls coupled to matter: the symmetron example, Phys. Rev. D90, 124041 (2014), arXiv:1410.2857 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  10. [17]

    J. A. Pearson, Simulating the symmetron: domain walls and symmetry-restoring impurities, Phys. Rev. D 90, 125011 (2014), [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 91, 049901 (2015)], arXiv:1409.6570 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Clements, B

    K. Clements, B. Elder, L. Hackermueller, M. Fromhold, and C. Burrage, Detecting Dark Domain Walls, Phys. Rev. D 109, 123023 (2024), arXiv:2308.01179 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Burrage, E

    C. Burrage, E. J. Copeland, C. K¨ ading, and P. Milling- ton, Symmetron scalar fields: Modified gravity, dark matter, or both?, Phys. Rev. D 99, 043539 (2019), arXiv:1811.12301 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  13. [20]

    K¨ ading, Lensing with Generalized Symmetrons, As- tronomy 2, 128 (2023), arXiv:2304.05875 [astro-ph.CO]

    C. K¨ ading, Lensing with Generalized Symmetrons, As- tronomy 2, 128 (2023), arXiv:2304.05875 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  14. [21]

    H. B. Nielsen and P. Olesen, Vortex Line Models for Dual Strings, Nucl. Phys. B 61, 45 (1973)

    1973

  15. [22]

    E. B. Bogomolny, Stability of Classical Solutions, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 24, 449 (1976)

    1976

  16. [23]

    M. K. Prasad and C. M. Sommerfield, An Exact Classi- cal Solution for the ’t Hooft Monopole and the Julia-Zee Dyon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 760 (1975)

    1975

  17. [24]

    S. A. Teukolsky, On the stability of the iterated Crank- Nicholson method in numerical relativity, Phys. Rev. D 61, 087501 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/9909026

    2000 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Helfer, J

    T. Helfer, J. C. Aurrekoetxea, and E. A. Lim, Cosmic String Loop Collapse in Full General Relativity, Phys. Rev. D 99, 104028 (2019), arXiv:1808.06678 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  19. [27]

    De Villiers and V

    J.-P. De Villiers and V. P. Frolov, Gravitational scatter- ing of cosmic strings by nonrotating black holes, Class. Quant. Grav. 16, 2403 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9812016

    1999 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Snajdr and V

    M. Snajdr and V. P. Frolov, Capture and critical scatter- ing of a long cosmic string by a rotating black hole, Class. Quant. Grav. 20, 1303 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0211018

    2003 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Dubath, M

    F. Dubath, M. Sakellariadou, and C. M. Viallet, Scatter- 8 ing of cosmic strings by black holes: Loop formation, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 16, 1311 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0609089

    2007 arXiv

  22. [30]

    H. Deng, A. Gruzinov, Y. Levin, and A. Vilenkin, Sim- ulating cosmic string loop captured by a rotating black hole, Phys. Rev. D 107, 123016 (2023), arXiv:2303.02726 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Bambhaniya, O

    P. Bambhaniya, O. Trivedi, I. Dymnikova, P. S. Joshi, and M. Khlopov, On the interactions of black holes and cosmic strings, Phys. Dark Univ. 46, 101553 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Gasilov, V

    V. Gasilov, V. Maslyankin, and M. Khlopov, Gas- dynamic effects of cosmic strings, Astrophysics 23, 485 (1985)

    1985

  25. [33]

    Jeudy, R

    V. Jeudy, R. D´ ıaz Pardo, W. Savero Torres, S. Bustin- gorry, and A. B. Kolton, Pinning of domain walls in thin ferromagnetic films, Phys. Rev. B 98, 054406 (2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    C. Chen, Y. Liu, Y. Chen, Y. N. Hu, T. Z. Zhang, D. Li, X. Wang, C. X. Wang, Z. Y. W. Lu, Y. H. Zhang, Q. L. Zhang, X. L. Dong, R. Wang, D. L. Feng, and T. Zhang, Revealing the microscopic mechanism of elementary vor- tex pinning in superconductors, Phys. Rev. X 14, 041039 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.