Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 159 references

Dissipative particle dynamics models of encapsulated microbubbles and gas vesicles for biomedical ultrasound simulations

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper develops a general mesh-based simulation framework that captures the elastic and rheological behavior of microbubbles and gas vesicles — including orthotropic gas-vesicle elasticity — and validates it against measured buckling…

desk verdict A genuinely useful DPD framework for anisotropic shells with rock-solid linear validation, but the only nonlinear quantitative check—gas vesicle buckling pressure—misses experiment by 1.7–5x and the paper's own explanation is not convincing; still worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.19890 v1 pith:WVFOWZLS submitted 2025-04-28 cond-mat.soft physics.bio-phphysics.comp-ph

Nikolaos Ntarakas , Maša Lah , Daniel Svenšek , Tilen Potisk , Matej Praprotnik This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softphysics.bio-phphysics.comp-ph
keywords dissipativeparticledynamicsgasvesiclesmicrobubblesultrasoundcontrastagentsorthotropicelasticitymembranebucklingshearflowtheranostics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Ultrasound contrast agents — micron-sized encapsulated microbubbles and sub-micron protein-shelled gas vesicles — are hard to model because their response to sound depends on shell thickness, local structure, and interaction with surrounding fluid, details that continuum bubble models cannot carry. This paper proposes one general mesoscopic framework: both the agent and its surroundings are built from dissipative-particle-dynamics beads, with the shell represented as a triangulated elastic surface whose in-plane and bending energies come from continuum thin-shell theory. The framework is deliberately anisotropic-capable, which matters because gas-vesicle shells are stiffened by helical GvpA protein ribs and must be described by orthotropic rather than isotropic elasticity. The authors validate the framework by matching linear-theory predictions for stretching, torsion, and compression, reproducing the spherical-shell buckling law, recovering gas-vesicle buckling pressures near the experimental hydrostatic collapse value of 64 kPa, extracting low-frequency vibrational modes consistent with cylindrical shell theory, and showing Jeffery-type tumbling in shear flow. If it holds, the framework would let researchers simulate many interacting agents in blood flow — including surface-functionalized vesicles — which single-bubble continuum models cannot do.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the triangulated shell: a network of vertices whose elastic forces are computed by discretizing the continuum thin-shell energy rather than by fitting pairwise potentials. In-plane energy uses the constant-strain-triangle approximation with the 2D elastic tensor $C_{ijkl}$ — isotropic for microbubbles, orthotropic for gas vesicles via the structural tensor $M = \mathbf{m}\otimes\mathbf{m}$ ($\mathbf{m}$ perpendicular to the protein ribs) — while bending is handled by a Kantor-Nelson discretization of curvature energy. Solvent and gas are DPD beads; the gas is treated as ideal with a compensating outward pressure force, and compression is applied by raising the water-water repulsion parameter $a_{ww}$. A single down-scaling factor $f_{\mathrm{scale}}$ (0.079 for gas vesicles, 0.0074 for microbubbles) reduces all elastic moduli while preserving the Föppl-von-Karman number $F_{vK} = ER_0^2/\kappa$, and simulated pressures are converted back to physical units by the same factor.

What would settle it

Run the gas-vesicle buckling simulation with the elastic moduli at their full physical values (down-scaling factor 1) and the same Föppl-von-Karman number, and check whether the critical pressure and the three-lobe-to-two-lobe shape sequence match the scaled run once pressures are up-scaled; on the experimental side, measure the hydrostatic collapse pressure of gas vesicles of the modeled dimensions (about 140 nm diameter, 500 nm length) under slow compression and check whether it falls near 38–71 kPa with the predicted lobe shapes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's claim is that a single particle-based framework, built from continuum thin-shell elasticity discretized on a triangulated network and immersed in a dissipative particle dynamics fluid, accurately captures the elastic and rheological properties of both isotropic microbubbles and orthotropic gas vesicles. The shell's in-plane elastic energy is governed by a 2D elastic tensor $C_{ijkl}$; for gas vesicles this tensor is constructed from the structural tensor $M=\mathbf{m}\otimes\mathbf{m}$, where $\mathbf{m}$ is perpendicular to the helical GvpA protein ribs, giving four independent constants that map onto two Young's moduli, a Poisson ratio, and a shear modulus. Bending energy is discretized with the Kantor-Nelson form. The validation chain is quantitative: stretching and torsion match linear elasticity; compression volume changes match the derived formulas $\Delta V/V_0 = -3R_0\,\Delta p/(4K_a)$ for bubbles and $\Delta V/V_0 = -R_0(1-4\nu_{lt}+4E_l/E_t)\,\Delta p/(2E_l)$ for gas vesicles; microbubble buckling follows the spherical-shell law $\Delta p_c = C(2E_{3D}/\sqrt{3(1-\nu^2)})(h/R)^2$ with a consistent imperfection factor $C = 0.52 \pm 0.01$; and the gas vesicle buckles into a three-lobe shape at about 37.9 kPa and a two-lobe shape near 71 kPa, bracketing the reported hydrostatic collapse pressure of 64 kPa, with the two-lobe shape matching an existing linear buckling analysis. The same model produces a lowest vibrational mode at about 201 MHz and reproduces Jeffery tumbling in shear flow, switching to fixed-angle alignment when the vesicle-water repulsion is raised. The paper itself flags that the bending constant is treated as an independent effective parameter, lower than the thin-shell value, since a single-molecular-layer membrane cannot be treated as a continuum across its thickness.

Load-bearing premise

The physical buckling-pressure numbers depend on the assumption that scaling down every elastic modulus of the shell by one common factor — 0.079 for gas vesicles — leaves the nonlinear buckling physics unchanged, so that simulated pressures up-scaled by the same factor are the true physical collapse pressures.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any shell with known elastic constants — biological cells, artificial capsules, lipid-coated bubbles — can be modeled at mesoscale with arbitrary shape and local anisotropy, including chemical surface functionalization.
  • The derived compression and stretching formulas give experimentalists direct routes to extract the longitudinal and transverse Young's moduli and the Poisson ratio of a gas vesicle from simple mechanical tests.
  • Because solvent and multiple agents are simulated explicitly, the framework extends beyond single-bubble continuum models to collective behavior of contrast-agent clouds in blood flow.
  • Surface chemistry becomes a tunable parameter: raising the vesicle-water repulsion switches vesicle motion in shear flow from tumbling to fixed-angle alignment, a lever relevant for steering functionalized vesicles toward target cells.
  • The predicted low-frequency modes near 200 MHz and the buckling mode shapes provide acoustic signatures that could inform the design of imaging and excitation sequences.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper compares its gas-vesicle buckling pressures against only one hydrostatic measurement (64 kPa) while its shell parameters come from a different vesicle species (Zhang et al. [59]); an implication the paper does not draw is that a systematic comparison across species and measurement modalities (hydrostatic vs. acoustic) would test whether the 38–71 kPa range is a genuine property of the mo
  • Because the down-scaling argument preserves the Föppl-von-Karman number but not, self-evidently, every dimensionless group of the nonlinear collapse, a full-scale simulation at fscale = 1 would settle whether the buckling-pressure claim is quantitatively robust; the authors do not report such a test.
  • The bending constant is treated as an independent effective parameter because the protein shell is a single molecular layer; a testable extension is to measure the gas-vesicle bending rigidity directly from thermal shape fluctuations in the simulations and check whether the thin-shell relation kappa = Eh^2/(12(1-nu^2)) is actually violated.
  • The flow-alignment transition controlled by the repulsion parameter predicts a surface-chemistry design rule: vesicle orientation in blood flow, and therefore binding efficiency, could be tuned by coating chemistry — an in vitro test the paper does not propose.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a DPD-based mesoscopic framework for encapsulated microbubbles (EMBs) and gas vesicles (GVs). The capsule is represented by a triangulated network with continuum-derived in-plane and bending elastic energies, extended to orthotropic elasticity for GVs. The authors validate the model with stretching, compression, buckling, eigenmode, and shear-flow simulations, and compare the predicted GV buckling pressure with literature values. The central claim is that the framework 'accurately captures elastic and rheological properties' of both agents.

Significance. The framework is potentially significant: it extends established RBC membrane DPD models to anisotropic shells and offers a route to simulate ultrasound contrast agents with arbitrary shapes, surface functionalization, and collective behavior. The paper's linear elasticity results are a genuine strength: the analytical small-strain formulas for stretching (Eqs. 7, 105-106), compression (Eqs. 8-9), and torsion (Fig. S7) are parameter-free and are verified directly against simulations. The eigenmode analysis and the Jeffery-orbit match in shear flow are also useful validations. However, the only quantitative nonlinear anchor, GV buckling, lies a factor of 1.7-5 below experiment, and the proposed explanations are not convincing, so the 'accurately captures' claim is not yet established beyond linear elasticity and qualitative mode shapes.

major comments (4)
  1. [Results, Buckling] The predicted GV buckling pressure at the three-lobe onset, approximately 37.9 kPa after the fscale conversion, is 1.7 times below the 64 kPa hydrostatic value of Ref. [61] and roughly 5 times below the 178-200 kPa values of Refs. [16,59]. Because this is the paper's only quantitative nonlinear comparison with experiment, the abstract's claim that the framework 'accurately captures elastic and rheological properties' is not supported in the nonlinear regime. The two proposed explanations do not close the gap: the acoustic-versus-hydrostatic argument can address Refs. [16,59] but not the 64 kPa hydrostatic measurement of Ref. [61]; and a smaller bending constant would lower, not raise, the cylindrical-shell buckling pressure, which scales as kappa/R^3. The authors should either recalibrate the model against the buckling data, with a sensitivity study over kappa and the elastic constants, or soften the accuracy claim to linear elasticity and qualitative buckling shapes.
  2. [Methods, Down-scaling of elastic forces] Equation (20) justifies the common fscale down-scaling by preservation of the Foppl-von-Karman number and the capillary number. This argument covers equilibrium shapes and linear-response quantities, but the manuscript uses it to rescale nonlinear buckling pressures. No test is provided that the buckling threshold is invariant under this rescaling, or that the rescaling is equivalent to simply computing with the physical moduli. Since the GV buckling comparison is the central experimental anchor, the authors should report a direct check, for example by repeating the buckling run at a second fscale value and showing that the rescaled critical pressure is unchanged.
  3. [Results, Gas vesicles; Table S4] There is an inconsistency in the bending rigidity. The text states that the GV bending constant is set to kappa = Et h^2/[12(1-nu_lt^2)], but Table S4 reports kappa_C = 16.14 kBT0 (6.68e-20 J). Using Et = 2 N/m (from E3D = 1 GPa and h = 2 nm) and nu = 0.3, the thin-shell value is about 7.3e-19 J, which is several times larger than the table's value; if kappa_C is the Kantor-Nelson parameter, the implied kappa is kappa_C/(2 sqrt(3)) approximately 1.9e-20 J, even smaller. Since the buckling pressure scales linearly with kappa, the reported value must be clarified and the buckling comparison should be discussed in light of the value actually used.
  4. [Supplementary S3.2, Eq. (104)] The EMB buckling validation fits the dimensionless factor C = 0.52 +/- 0.01 to the simulation data (Fig. S6). This confirms that the simulated critical pressure follows the 1/R^2 scaling but does not provide an independent test of predictive accuracy, because C is calibrated on the same data. The EMB buckling behavior should therefore be described as consistent with the classical scaling law rather than as validated against experiment.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The word 'continuuum' should be 'continuum'.
  2. [Fig. 2 caption] The phrase 'The coloring in the side views (a) the top views (c)-(e)' is ungrammatical; an 'and' is missing before 'the top views'.
  3. [Results, Gas vesicles] In the sentence introducing FvK, 'numberFvK' should have a space before 'FvK'.
  4. [Methods, Eq. (22)] The symbol kfsi is used in Eq. (22) but its meaning is only defined in the surrounding text; a one-line definition immediately before the equation would improve readability.
  5. [Discussion / Supplementary S2] The orthotropic force implementation is described only briefly; a short pseudocode summary of the new Mirheo membrane force kernel would aid reproducibility.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

Minor circularity in the microbubble buckling 'validation' (the empirical factor C is fitted to the simulated data); the gas-vesicle buckling comparison against external experiments is a genuine independent test.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Results, Buckling (main text); Supplementary S3.2, Eq. (104) and Fig. S6]
    "An analytical expression for the critical buckling pressure of spherical shells exists, Eq. (104) in S3.2, which is in an excellent agreement with our simulations, see Fig. S6 in S3.2. It involves an empirical correction factor due to imperfections of the shell, which consistently takes on a well-defined value also for our model emb. ... We find that the Eq. (104) is in excellent agreement with the simulations, Fig. S6, with C = 0.52±0.01."

    The 'excellent agreement' of Eq. (104) with the EMB buckling simulations is produced by the fit itself: the dimensionless empirical factor C in Eq. (104) is determined from the simulated critical pressures shown in Fig. S6 (C = 0.52±0.01). The analytical expression is therefore not an independent prediction of the EMB buckling pressure; its agreement with the simulation data is enforced by construction. The remaining content is the R^-2 scaling law, which is a genuine functional test, but the paper presents the full expression as validation of the model. This is a fitted input presented as a validation step.

full rationale

The framework's constitutive core is implemented from the continuum shell energy (Eqs. (1)-(6) with discretizations in Supplementary Eqs. (39)-(64)), and the small-strain stretching, compression, and torsion checks are numerical consistency tests of that discretization rather than circular predictions. The GV buckling pressure is compared to independent experimental values (Refs. [16,59,61]), and the paper openly reports that its prediction lies below experiment, so that comparison is external and non-circular. The one self-referential step is the EMB buckling validation: Eq. (104) contains an empirical imperfection factor C that is fitted to the simulation's own buckling pressures (Fig. S6; C=0.52±0.01); saying the analytical expression is in 'excellent agreement' is therefore a restatement of the fit rather than a prediction. This does not infect the central GV result, which rests on external data, and the down-scaling factor fscale is a parameter choice rather than a fitted prediction, so the overall circularity is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central validation rests on several modeling choices: downscaled elastic moduli, a thin-shell bending relation, ideal-gas pressure compensation, and calibrated DPD parameters. The gas vesicle buckling benchmark is external, but the rescaling and bending assumptions control the reported absolute pressure.

free parameters (3)
  • Down-scaling factor fscale = 0.0074 (emb), 0.079 (gv)
    Chosen by hand to keep bending energy above 10 kBT and to make simulations feasible; all reported physical pressures are simulation pressures multiplied by fscale, so absolute buckling values depend on it.
  • Emb buckling correction factor C = 0.52 +/- 0.01
    Fitted to the authors' own microbubble buckling simulations and used in Eq. (104); the claimed agreement for microbubble buckling is therefore a fit, not an independent prediction.
  • DPD dissipative parameters (gamma_ww, gamma_gg, gamma_ow) = emb: 3.5, 11.0, 7.4; gv: 18.0, 12.0, 19.5 m/tau
    Calibrated to reproduce water and gas viscosities and the no-slip boundary condition; these parameters affect shear flow dynamics and viscous damping of the shells.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption In linear thin-shell elasticity, in-plane and bending deformations decouple, and the flexural rigidity tensor is fixed by the in-plane elastic tensor through D = (h^2/12) C.
    Invoked in Methods Eq. (38) and Supplementary S1 Eq. (36); the paper itself notes this may fail for single-molecular-layer membranes, yet the gas vesicle bending constant is set from this thin-shell relation.
  • ad hoc to paper Scaling all elastic moduli by a common factor fscale preserves the Foppl-von-Karman number and therefore the equilibrium shape and buckling geometry, so simulated stresses can be rescaled to physical units.
    Methods section 'Down-scaling of elastic forces', Eq. (20); load-bearing for the gas vesicle buckling pressure comparison.
  • ad hoc to paper The gas phase can be modeled as ideal by setting gas-gas conservative interactions to zero and compensating with an outward pressure force on each membrane triangle, with a fixed compensation pressure.
    Methods section 'Inducing compression and buckling'; gas compressibility is said to be important at buckling, but the described compensation force does not implement a volume-dependent ideal gas law.
  • domain assumption The DPD equation of state p = rho kBT + alpha a_ww rho^2 with alpha approximately 0.100 rc^4 is valid for the simulated densities and interaction parameters.
    Used in Methods and verified in Supplementary Fig. S9; this is a semi-empirical relation from the DPD literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dissipative particle dynamics models of encapsulated microbubbles and gas vesicles for biomedical ultrasound simulations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WVFOWZLS

@misc{pith2026250419890,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dissipative particle dynamics models of encapsulated microbubbles and gas vesicles for biomedical ultrasound simulations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WVFOWZLS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.19890}
}
read the original abstract

Ultrasound-guided drug and gene delivery (usdg) enables controlled and spatially precise delivery of drugs and macromolecules, encapsulated in microbubbles (embs) and submicron gas vesicles (gvs), to target areas such as cancer tumors. It is a non-invasive, high precision, low toxicity process with drastically reduced drug dosage. Rheological and acoustic properties of gvs and embs critically affect the outcome of usdg and imaging. Detailed understanding and modeling of their physical properties is thus essential for ultrasound-mediated therapeutic applications. State-of-the-art continuuum models of shelled bodies cannot incorporate critical details such as varying thickness of the encapsulating shell or specific interactions between its constituents and interior or exterior solvents. Such modeling approaches also do not allow for detailed modeling of chemical surface functionalizations, which are crucial for tuning the gv-blood interactions. We develop a general particle-based modeling framework for encapsulated bodies that accurately captures elastic and rheological properties of gvs and embs. We use dissipative particle dynamics to model the solvent, the gaseous phase in the capsid, and the triangulated surfaces of immersed objects. Their elastic behavior is studied and validated through stretching and buckling simulations, eigenmode analysis, shear flow simulations, and comparison of predicted gv buckling pressure with experimental data from the literature. The presented modeling approach paves the way for large-scale simulations of encapsulated bodies, capturing their dynamics, interactions, and collective behavior.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

159 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [61]

    Cherin, E. et al. Acoustic Behavior of Halobacterium salinarum Gas Vesicles in the High-Frequency Range: Experiments and Modeling. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 43, 1016–1030 (2017)

    2017

  2. [1]

    Lee, H. et al. Microbubbles used for contrast enhanced ultrasound and ther- agnosis: A review of principles to applications. Biomed. Eng. Lett. 7, 59–69 (2017)

    2017

  3. [2]

    Lindner, J. R. Microbubbles in medical imaging: Current applications and future directions. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 3, 527 (2004)

    2004

  4. [3]

    & Barenholz, Y

    Schroeder, A., Kost, J. & Barenholz, Y. Ultrasound, liposomes, and drug delivery: Principles for using ultrasound to control the release of drugs from liposomes. Chem. Phys. Lipids 162, 1–16 (2009)

    2009

  5. [4]

    Functional ultrasound imaging of the brain

    Mac´ e, E.et al. Functional ultrasound imaging of the brain. Nat. Methods 8, 662–664 (2011)

    2011

  6. [5]

    & Fink, M

    Tanter, M. & Fink, M. Ultrafast imaging in biomedical ultrasound. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 61, 102–119 (2014)

    2014

  7. [6]

    L., Osmanski, B

    Rungta, R. L., Osmanski, B. F., Boido, D., Tanter, M. & Charpak, S. Light controls cerebral blood flow in naive animals. Nat. Commun. 8, 14191 (2017)

    2017

  8. [7]

    & Carlisle, R

    Mo, S., Coussios, C., Seymour, L. & Carlisle, R. Ultrasound-enhanced drug delivery for cancer. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 9, 1525–1538 (2012)

    2012

Show all 159 references
  1. [8]

    Wu, D. et al. Biomolecular actuators for genetically selective acoustic manipu- lation of cells. Sci. Adv. 9, eadd9186 (2023)

    2023

  2. [9]

    & Sarkar, K

    Paul, S., Nahire, R., Mallik, S. & Sarkar, K. Encapsulated microbubbles and echogenic liposomes for contrast ultrasound imaging and targeted drug delivery. Comput. Mech. 53, 413–435 (2014)

    2014

  3. [10]

    E., Machtaler, S

    Wang, T.-Y., Wilson, K. E., Machtaler, S. & Willmann, J. K. Ultrasound and Microbubble Guided Drug Delivery: Mechanistic Understanding and Clinical Implications. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 14, 743–752 (2014)

    2014

  4. [11]

    & Grayburn, P

    Unger, E., Porter, T., Lindner, J. & Grayburn, P. Cardiovascular drug delivery with ultrasound and microbubbles. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 72, 110–126 (2014)

    2014

  5. [12]

    Meng, L. et al. Sonoporation of cells by a parallel stable cavitation microbubble array. Adv. Sci. 6, 1900557 (2019)

    2019

  6. [13]

    Choi, J. J. et al. Microbubble-size dependence of focused ultrasound-induced blood–brain barrier opening in mice in vivo. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 57, 145–154 (2009)

    2009

  7. [14]

    J., Selert, K., Vlachos, F., Wong, A

    Choi, J. J., Selert, K., Vlachos, F., Wong, A. & Konofagou, E. E. Noninvasive and localized neuronal delivery using short ultrasonic pulses and microbubbles. 44 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 16539–16544 (2011)

    2011

  8. [15]

    Konofagou, E. E. Optimization of the ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening. Theranostics 2, 1223 (2012)

    2012

  9. [16]

    Lakshmanan, A. et al. Molecular Engineering of Acoustic Protein Nanostruc- tures. ACS Nano 10, 7314–7322 (2016)

    2016

  10. [17]

    Maresca, D. et al. Nonlinear ultrasound imaging of nanoscale acoustic biomolecules. Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 073704 (2017)

    2017

  11. [18]

    Main, M. L. et al. Acute mortality in critically ill patients undergoing echocar- diography with or without an ultrasound contrast agent. JACC: Cardiovasc. Imaging 7, 40–48 (2014)

    2014

  12. [19]

    & Coussios, C

    Choi, J. & Coussios, C. Spatiotemporal evolution of cavitation dynamics exhib- ited by flowing microbubbles during ultrasound exposure. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132, 3538–3549 (2012)

    2012

  13. [20]

    & Roy, R

    Coussios, C. & Roy, R. Applications of acoustics and cavitation to noninvasive therapy and drug delivery. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40, 395–420 (2008)

    2008

  14. [21]

    Pandur, ˇZ. et al. Water treatment by cavitation: Understanding it at a single bubble-bacterial cell level. Water Res. 236, 119956 (2023)

    2023

  15. [22]

    M., Klauda, J

    Ezzeldin, H. M., Klauda, J. B. & Solares, S. D. Modeling of the major gas vesicle protein, GvpA: From protein sequence to vesicle wall structure. J. Struct. Biol. 179, 18–28 (2012)

    2012

  16. [23]

    & Kim, K

    Park, J. & Kim, K. W. Microscopy of Microbial Gas Vesicles. Appl. Microsc. 47, 165–170 (2017)

    2017

  17. [24]

    Walsby, A. E. Structure and function of gas vacuoles. Bacteriol Rev 36, 1–32 (1972)

    1972

  18. [25]

    Walsby, A. E. Gas vesicles. Microbiol. Rev. 58, 94–144 (1994)

    1994

  19. [26]

    Walsby, A. E. & Fogg, G. E. The pressure relationships of gas vacuoles. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 178, 301–326 (1971)

    1971

  20. [27]

    Xu, B.-Y. et al. Structure of the gas vesicle protein GvpF from the cyanobac- terium Microcystis aeruginosa. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 70, 3013–3022 (2014)

    2014

  21. [28]

    & Sun, L

    Yang, Y., Qiu, Z., Hou, X. & Sun, L. Ultrasonic Characteristics and Cellular Properties of Anabaena Gas Vesicles. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 43, 2862–2870 (2017). 45

    2017

  22. [29]

    Jazbec, V. et al. Protein Gas Vesicles of Bacillus megaterium as Enhancers of Ultrasound-Induced Transcriptional Regulation. ACS Nano 18, 16692–16700 (2024). PMID: 38952323

    2024

  23. [30]

    Dutka, P. et al. Structure of Anabaena flos-aquae gas vesicles revealed by cryo- ET. Structure 31, 518–528.e6 (2023)

    2023

  24. [31]

    T., Terwiel, D., Evers, W

    Huber, S. T., Terwiel, D., Evers, W. H., Maresca, D. & Jakobi, A. J. Cryo-EM structure of gas vesicles for buoyancy-controlled motility. Cell 186, 975–986.e13 (2023)

    2023

  25. [32]

    & Pfeifer, F

    Offner, S., Ziese, U., Wanner, G., Typke, D. & Pfeifer, F. Structural character- istics of halobacterial gas vesicles. Microbiology 144, 1331–1342 (1998)

    1998

  26. [33]

    Maresca, D. et al. Biomolecular Ultrasound and Sonogenetics. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 9, 229–252 (2018)

    2018

  27. [34]

    D., Bouakaz, A

    Jong, N. D., Bouakaz, A. & Frinking, P. Basic Acoustic Properties of Microbubbles. Echocardiography 19, 229–240 (2002)

    2002

  28. [35]

    Response of contrast agents to ultrasound

    Sboros, V. Response of contrast agents to ultrasound. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 60, 1117–1136 (2008)

    2008

  29. [36]

    & Gompper, G

    Noguchi, H. & Gompper, G. Shape transitions of fluid vesicles and red blood cells in capillary flows. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 14159–14164 (2005)

    2005

  30. [37]

    M., Halliday, I., Care, C

    Dupin, M. M., Halliday, I., Care, C. M., Alboul, L. & Munn, L. L. Modeling the flow of dense suspensions of deformable particles in three dimensions. Phys. Rev. E 75, 066707 (2007)

    2007

  31. [38]

    E., Boal, D

    Discher, D. E., Boal, D. H. & Boey, S. K. Simulations of the Erythrocyte Cytoskeleton at Large Deformation. II. Micropipette Aspiration. Biophys. J. 75, 1584–1597 (1998)

    1998

  32. [39]

    Li, J., Dao, M., Lim, C. T. & Suresh, S. Spectrin-Level Modeling of the Cytoskeleton and Optical Tweezers Stretching of the Erythrocyte. Biophys. J. 88, 3707–3719 (2005)

    2005

  33. [40]

    Pivkin, I. V. & Karniadakis, G. E. Accurate Coarse-Grained Modeling of Red Blood Cells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 118105 (2008)

    2008

  34. [41]

    & Kroll, D

    Gompper, G. & Kroll, D. M. Network models of fluid, hexatic and polymerized membranes. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 9, 8795–8834 (1997)

    1997

  35. [42]

    & Kroll, D

    Gompper, G. & Kroll, D. Triangulated-surface models of fluctuating membranes. Statistical mechanics of membranes and surfaces 359–426 (2004). 46

    2004

  36. [43]

    & Gompper, G

    Noguchi, H. & Gompper, G. Dynamics of fluid vesicles in shear flow: Effect of membrane viscosity and thermal fluctuations. Phys. Rev. E 72, 011901 (2005)

    2005

  37. [44]

    A., Caswell, B

    Fedosov, D. A., Caswell, B. & Karniadakis, G. E. A Multiscale Red Blood Cell Model with Accurate Mechanics, Rheology, and Dynamics. Biophys. J. 98, 2215–2225 (2010)

    2010

  38. [45]

    A., Caswell, B

    Fedosov, D. A., Caswell, B. & Karniadakis, G. E. Systematic coarse-graining of spectrin-level red blood cell models. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 199, 1937–1948 (2010)

    2010

  39. [46]

    A., Lei, H., Caswell, B., Suresh, S

    Fedosov, D. A., Lei, H., Caswell, B., Suresh, S. & Karniadakis, G. E. Multiscale Modeling of Red Blood Cell Mechanics and Blood Flow in Malaria. PLOS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002270 (2011)

    2011

  40. [47]

    A., Peltom¨ aki, M

    Fedosov, D. A., Peltom¨ aki, M. & Gompper, G. Deformation and dynamics of red blood cells in flow through cylindrical microchannels. Soft Matter 10, 4258–4267 (2014)

    2014

  41. [48]

    M¨ uller, K., Fedosov, D. A. & Gompper, G. Understanding particle margination in blood flow – A step toward optimized drug delivery systems. Med. Eng. Phys. 38, 2–10 (2016)

    2016

  42. [49]

    & Fedosov, D

    Shi, X., Lin, G., Zou, J. & Fedosov, D. A. A lattice Boltzmann fictitious domain method for modeling red blood cell deformation and multiple-cell hydrodynamic interactions in flow. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 72, 895–911 (2013)

    2013

  43. [50]

    Ye, T., Phan-Thien, N., Khoo, B. C. & Lim, C. T. Dissipative particle dynamics simulations of deformation and aggregation of healthy and diseased red blood cells in a tube flow. Phys. Fluids 26, 111902 (2014)

    2014

  44. [51]

    Ye, T., Phan-Thien, N., Khoo, B. C. & Lim, C. T. A file of red blood cells in tube flow: A three-dimensional numerical study. J. Appl. Phys. 116, 124703 (2014)

    2014

  45. [52]

    Rossinelli, D. et al. 11 PFLOP/s Simulations of Cloud Cavitation Collapse (2013)

    2013

  46. [53]

    & Koumoutsakos, P

    Rasthofer, U., Wermelinger, F., Karnakov, P., ˇSukys, J. & Koumoutsakos, P. Computational study of the collapse of a cloud with 12500 gas bubbles in a liquid. Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 063602 (2019)

    2019

  47. [54]

    Rayleigh, L. VIII. On the pressure developed in a liquid during the collapse of a spherical cavity. Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 34, 94–98 (1917)

    1917

  48. [55]

    & Plesset, M

    Hickling, R. & Plesset, M. S. Collapse and Rebound of a Spherical Bubble in Water. Phys. Fluids 7, 7–14 (1964). 47

    1964

  49. [56]

    & Garbin, V

    Dollet, B., Marmottant, P. & Garbin, V. Bubble Dynamics in Soft and Biological Matter. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 51, 331–355 (2019)

    2019

  50. [57]

    Counting bubbles acoustically: A review

    Medwin, H. Counting bubbles acoustically: A review. Ultrasonics 15, 7–13 (1977)

    1977

  51. [58]

    Qin, S., Caskey, C. F. & Ferrara, K. W. Ultrasound contrast microbubbles in imaging and therapy: Physical principles and engineering. Phys. Med. Biol. 54, R27–R57 (2009)

    2009

  52. [59]

    Zhang, S. et al. The vibration behavior of sub-micrometer gas vesicles in response to acoustic excitation determined via laser doppler vibrometry. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 2000239 (2020)

    2020

  53. [60]

    Salahshoor, H. et al. Geometric effects in gas vesicle buckling under ultrasound. Biophysical Journal 121, 4221–4228 (2022)

    2022

  54. [62]

    Y., Dunbar, M., Keten, S

    Zhao, T. Y., Dunbar, M., Keten, S. & Patankar, N. A. The buckling- condensation mechanism driving gas vesicle collapse. Soft Matter 19, 1174–1185 (2023)

    2023

  55. [63]

    & Bom, N

    de Jong, N., Hoff, L., Skotland, T. & Bom, N. Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: Theoretical considerations and some measurements. Ultrasonics 30, 95–103 (1992)

    1992

  56. [64]

    & Lanc´ ee, C

    de Jong, N., Cornet, R. & Lanc´ ee, C. T. Higher harmonics of vibrating gas-filled microspheres. Part one: Simulations. Ultrasonics 32, 447–453 (1994)

    1994

  57. [65]

    & Lanc´ ee, C

    de Jong, N., Cornet, R. & Lanc´ ee, C. T. Higher harmonics of vibrating gas-filled microspheres. Part two: Measurements. Ultrasonics 32, 455–459 (1994)

    1994

  58. [66]

    Marmottant, P. et al. A model for large amplitude oscillations of coated bubbles accounting for buckling and rupture.J. Acoust. Soc. Am.118, 3499–3505 (2005)

    2005

  59. [67]

    & Hilgenfeldt, S

    Marmottant, P., Biben, T. & Hilgenfeldt, S. Deformation and rupture of lipid vesicles in the strong shear flow generated by ultrasound-driven microbubbles. Proc. R. Soc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 464, 1781–1800 (2008)

    2008

  60. [68]

    & Quilliet, C

    Marmottant, P., Bouakaz, A., de Jong, N. & Quilliet, C. Buckling resistance of solid shell bubbles under ultrasound. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129, 1231–1239 (2011)

    2011

  61. [69]

    & Hynynen, K

    Sassaroli, E. & Hynynen, K. Resonance frequency of microbubbles in small blood vessels: A numerical study. Phys. Med. Biol. 50, 5293–5305 (2005). 48

    2005

  62. [70]

    & Hynynen, K

    Hosseinkhah, N. & Hynynen, K. A three-dimensional model of an ultrasound contrast agent gas bubble and its mechanical effects on microvessels. Phys. Med. Biol. 57, 785–808 (2012)

    2012

  63. [71]

    Hosseinkhah, N., Goertz, D. E. & Hynynen, K. Microbubbles and Blood–Brain Barrier Opening: A Numerical Study on Acoustic Emissions and Wall Stress Predictions. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 62, 1293–1304 (2015)

    2015

  64. [72]

    Ussing, H. H. Transport of ions across cellular membranes. Physiol. Rev 29, 127–155 (1949)

    1949

  65. [73]

    Pandit, S. A. & Scott, H. L. in Simulations and models of lipid bilayers (eds Gompper, G. & Schick, M.) Soft Matter, Vol 4: Lipid Bilayers and Red Blood Cells 1–82 (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2008)

    2008

  66. [74]

    & Nelson, D

    Lidmar, J., Mirny, L. & Nelson, D. R. Virus shapes and buckling transitions in spherical shells. Phys. Rev. E 68, 051910 (2003)

    2003

  67. [75]

    & Wood, R

    Bonet, J. & Wood, R. D. Nonlinear continuum mechanics for finite element analysis (Cambridge university press, 1997)

    1997

  68. [76]

    & Kato, T

    Komura, S., Tamura, K. & Kato, T. Buckling of spherical shells adhering onto a rigid substrate. Eur. Phys. J. E 18 (2005)

    2005

  69. [77]

    J., Clough, R

    Turner, M. J., Clough, R. W., Martin, H. C. & Topp, L. Stiffness and deflection analysis of complex structures. J. Aeronaut. Sci. 23, 805–823 (1956)

    1956

  70. [78]

    A., Caswell, B

    Fedosov, D. A., Caswell, B. & Karniadakis, G. E. A multiscale red blood cell model with accurate mechanics, rheology, and dynamics. Biophys J. 98, 2215– 2225 (2010)

    2010

  71. [79]

    Economides, A. et al. Towards the Virtual Rheometer: High Performance Computing for the Red Blood Cell Microstructure (2017)

    2017

  72. [80]

    Economides, A. et al. Hierarchical Bayesian uncertainty quantification for a model of the red blood cell. Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 034062 (2021)

    2021

  73. [81]

    & Koumoutsakos, P

    Amoudruz, L., Economides, A., Arampatzis, G. & Koumoutsakos, P. The stress- free state of human erythrocytes: Data-driven inference of a transferable RBC model. Biophys. J. 122, 1517–1525 (2023)

    2023

  74. [82]

    C., Derick, L

    Liu, S. C., Derick, L. H. & Palek, J. Visualization of the hexagonal lattice in the erythrocyte membrane skeleton. J. Cell Biol. 104, 527–536 (1987)

    1987

  75. [83]

    & Pelekasis, N

    Vlachomitrou, M. & Pelekasis, N. Dynamic simulation of a coated microbubble in an unbounded flow: response to a step change in pressure. J. Fluid Mech. 822, 717–761 (2017). 49

    2017

  76. [84]

    Chabouh, G. et al. Buckling of lipidic ultrasound contrast agents under quasi- static load. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 381, 20220025 (2023)

    2023

  77. [85]

    Poisson’s ratio in orthotropic materials

    Lempriere, B. Poisson’s ratio in orthotropic materials. AIAA J. 6, 2226–2227 (1968)

    1968

  78. [86]

    & Barbic, J

    Li, Y. & Barbic, J. Stable orthotropic materials. , 41–46 (2014)

    2014

  79. [87]

    Spencer, A. J. M. Constitutive Theory for Strongly Anisotropic Solids , 1–32 (Springer Vienna, 1984)

    1984

  80. [88]

    Timoshenko, S., Woinowsky-Krieger, S. et al. Theory of plates and shells Vol. 2 (McGraw-hill New York, 1959)

    1959

  81. [89]

    Dao, M., Lim, C. T. & Suresh, S. Mechanics of the human red blood cell deformed by optical tweezers. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 51, 2259–2280 (2003)

    2003

  82. [90]

    Rivlin, R. S. & Saunders, D. Large elastic deformations of isotropic materials VII. Experiments on the deformation of rubber. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 243, 251–288 (1951)

    1951

  83. [91]

    A., Williams, S., Ku, D

    Stammen, J. A., Williams, S., Ku, D. N. & Guldberg, R. E. Mechanical proper- ties of a novel PVA hydrogel in shear and unconfined compression. Biomaterials 22, 799–806 (2001)

    2001

  84. [92]

    R., Dejgosha, S

    Deufel, C., Forth, S., Simmons, C. R., Dejgosha, S. & Wang, M. D. Nanofabri- cated quartz cylinders for angular trapping: DNA supercoiling torque detection. Nat. Methods 4, 223–225 (2007)

    2007

  85. [93]

    Bai, L., Fulbright, R. M. & Wang, M. D. Mechanochemical kinetics of transcription elongation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 068103 (2007)

    2007

  86. [94]

    & Gallet, F

    H´ enon, S., Lenormand, G., Richert, A. & Gallet, F. A new determination of the shear modulus of the human erythrocyte membrane using optical tweezers. Biophys. J. 76, 1145–1151 (1999)

    1999

  87. [95]

    Walsby, A. E. & Fogg, G. E. The elastic compressibility of gas vesicles. Proceed- ings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 216, 355–368 (1982)

    1982

  88. [96]

    & Searle, V

    Newman, F. & Searle, V. The General Properties of Matter (Edward Arnold, London, 1957)

    1957

  89. [97]

    Vliegenthart, G. A. & Gompper, G. Compression, crumpling and collapse of spherical shells and capsules. New J. Phys. 13, 045020 (2011)

    2011

  90. [98]

    & De Jong, N

    Bouakaz, A. & De Jong, N. Native tissue imaging at superharmonic frequencies. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 50, 496–506 (2003). 50

    2003

  91. [99]

    N., Zhu, Y

    Zhang, Y., Yu, J., Bomba, H. N., Zhu, Y. & Gu, Z. Mechanical force-triggered drug delivery. Chem. Rev. 116, 12536–12563 (2016)

    2016

  92. [100]

    Donnell, L. H. A new theory for the buckling of thin cylinders under axial compression and bending. J. Fluids Eng. 56, 795–806 (1934)

    1934

  93. [101]

    Nonlinear Mechanics of Shells and Plates in Composite, Soft and Biological Materials (Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    Amabili, M. Nonlinear Mechanics of Shells and Plates in Composite, Soft and Biological Materials (Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    2018

  94. [102]

    Jeffery, G. B. The motion of ellipsoidal particles immersed in a viscous fluid. Proc. R. soc. Lond. Ser. A-Contain. Pap. Math. Phys. Character 102, 161–179 (1922)

    1922

  95. [103]

    & Glaser, R

    Svetina, S., Ottova-Leitmannov´ a, A. & Glaser, R. Membrane bending energy in relation to bilayer couples concept of red blood cell shape transformations. J. Theor. Biol. 94, 13–23 (1982)

    1982

  96. [104]

    & ˇZekˇ s, B

    Svetina, S. & ˇZekˇ s, B. Bilayer couple hypothesis of red cell shape transformations and osmotic hemolysis. Biomed. Biochim. Acta 42, l983 (1983)

    1983

  97. [105]

    & ˇZekˇ s, B

    Svetina, S. & ˇZekˇ s, B. Membrane bending energy and shape determination of phospholipid vesicles and red blood cells. Eur. Biophys. J. 17, 101–111 (1989)

    1989

  98. [106]

    & Raphael, R

    Svetina, S., ˇZekˇ s, B., Waugh, R. & Raphael, R. Theoretical analysis of the effect of the transbilayer movement of phospholipid molecules on the dynamic behavior of a microtube pulled out of an aspirated vesicle. Eur. Biophys. J. 27, 197–209 (1998)

    1998

  99. [107]

    &ˇZekˇ s, B

    Heinrich, V., Boˇ ziˇ c, B., Svetina, S. &ˇZekˇ s, B. Vesicle deformation by an axial load: from elongated shapes to tethered vesicles. Biophys. J. 76, 2056–2071 (1999)

    1999

  100. [108]

    &ˇZekˇ s, B

    Derganc, J., Boˇ ziˇ c, B., Svetina, S. &ˇZekˇ s, B. Equilibrium shapes of erythrocytes in rouleau formation. Biophys. J. 84, 1486–1492 (2003)

    2003

  101. [109]

    & Svetina, S

    Ziherl, P. & Svetina, S. Membrane elasticity molds aggregates of simple cells. Soft Matter 4, 1937–1942 (2008)

    2008

  102. [110]

    & Koumoutsakos, P

    Bian, X., Litvinov, S. & Koumoutsakos, P. Bending models of lipid bilayer mem- branes: Spontaneous curvature and area-difference elasticity. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 359, 112758 (2020)

    2020

  103. [111]

    ˇSiber, A., Boˇ ziˇ c, A. L. & Podgornik, R. Energies and pressures in viruses: contribution of nonspecific electrostatic interactions. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 3746–3765 (2012)

    2012

  104. [112]

    & Podgornik, R

    Zandi, R., Dragnea, B., Travesset, A. & Podgornik, R. On virus growth and form. Physics Reports 847, 1–102 (2020). 51

    2020

  105. [113]

    & Praprotnik, M

    Lah, M., Ntarakas, N., Potisk, T., Papeˇ z, P. & Praprotnik, M. Open-boundary molecular dynamics of ultrasound using supramolecular water models. J. Chem. Phys. 162, 024103 (2025)

    2025

  106. [114]

    & Praprotnik, M

    Papeˇ z, P. & Praprotnik, M. Dissipative particle dynamics simulation of ultrasound propagation through liquid water. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 18, 1227–1240 (2022)

    2022

  107. [115]

    & Noguchi, H

    Asano, Y., Watanabe, H. & Noguchi, H. Molecular dynamics simulation of soundwave propagation in a simple fluid. J. Chem. Phys. 153 (2020)

    2020

  108. [116]

    & Noguchi, H

    Asano, Y., Watanabe, H. & Noguchi, H. Effects of vapor-liquid phase transitions on sound-wave propagation: A molecular dynamics study. Phys. Rev. Fluids 7 (2022)

    2022

  109. [117]

    & Koumoutsakos, P

    Alexeev, D., Amoudruz, L., Litvinov, S. & Koumoutsakos, P. Mirheo: high- performance mesoscale simulations for microfluidics. Comput. Phys. Commun. 254, 107298 (2020)

    2020

  110. [118]

    Hoogerbrugge, P. J. & Koelman, J. M. V. A. Simulating microscopic hydro- dynamic phenomena with dissipative particle dynamics. Europhys. Lett. 19, 155–160 (1992)

    1992

  111. [119]

    Hydrodynamics from dissipative particle dynamics

    Espa˜ nol, P. Hydrodynamics from dissipative particle dynamics. Phys. Rev. E 52, 1734–1742 (1995)

    1995

  112. [120]

    Groot, R. D. & Warren, P. B. Dissipative particle dynamics: Bridging the gap between atomistic and mesoscopic simulation. J. Chem. Phys. 107, 4423–4435 (1997)

    1997

  113. [121]

    A., Backx, G

    Marsh, C. A., Backx, G. & Ernst, M. H. Static and dynamic properties of dissipative particle dynamics. Phys. Rev. E 56, 1676–1691 (1997)

    1997

  114. [122]

    & Yuen, D

    Dzwinel, W. & Yuen, D. A. Matching macroscopic properties of binary fluids to the interactions of dissipative particle dynamics. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 11, 1–25 (2000)

    2000

  115. [123]

    Trofimov, S. Y. Thermodynamic consistency in dissipative particle dynamics (2003)

    2003

  116. [124]

    Pivkin, I. V. & Karniadakis, G. E. Coarse-graining limits in open and wall- bounded dissipative particle dynamics systems. J. Chem. Phys. 124, 184101 (2006)

    2006

  117. [125]

    A., Gompper, G

    Paulose, J., Vliegenthart, G. A., Gompper, G. & Nelson, D. R. Fluctuating shells under pressure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 19551–19556 (2012). 52

    2012

  118. [126]

    De Gennes, P. G. Wetting: statics and dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 827 (1985)

    1985

  119. [127]

    & Ishida, T

    Tsuji, Y., Tanaka, T. & Ishida, T. Lagrangian numerical simulation of plug flow of cohesionless particles in a horizontal pipe. Powder Technol. 71, 239–250 (1992)

    1992

  120. [128]

    & Espa˜ nol, P

    Revenga, M., Z´ u˜ niga, I. & Espa˜ nol, P. Boundary conditions in dissipative parti- cle dynamics. Comput. Phys. Commun. 121-122, 309–311 (1999). Proceedings of the Europhysics Conference on Computational Physics CCP 1998

    1999

  121. [129]

    & Praprotnik, M

    Delgado-Buscalioni, R., Sabli´ c, J. & Praprotnik, M. Open boundary molecular dynamics. Eur. Phys. J.: Spec. Top. 224, 2331–2349 (2015)

    2015

  122. [130]

    & Praprotnik, M

    Delle Site, L. & Praprotnik, M. Molecular systems with open boundaries: Theory and simulation. Phys. Rep. 693, 1 – 56 (2017)

    2017

  123. [131]

    Potisk, T. et al. Analyte-Driven Clustering of Bio-Conjugated Magnetic Nanoparticles. Adv. Theory Simul. 6, 2200796 (2023)

    2023

  124. [132]

    & Coveney, P

    Delgado-Buscalioni, R. & Coveney, P. V. USHER: An algorithm for particle insertion in dense fluids. J. Chem. Phys. 119, 978–987 (2003)

    2003

  125. [133]

    & Kushick, J

    Karplus, M. & Kushick, J. N. Method for estimating the configurational entropy of macromolecules. Macromolecules 14, 325–332 (1981)

    1981

  126. [134]

    Amadei, A., Linssen, A. B. M. & Berendsen, H. J. C. Essential dynamics of proteins. Proteins 17, 412–425 (1993)

    1993

  127. [135]

    R., Janeˇ ziˇ c, D

    Brooks, B. R., Janeˇ ziˇ c, D. & Karplus, M. Harmonic analysis of large systems. I. Methodology. J. Comput. Chem. 16, 1522–1542 (1995)

    1995

  128. [136]

    Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components

    Hotelling, H. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. J. Educ. Psychol. 24, 417 (1933)

    1933

  129. [137]

    Xu, Z. P. et al. Trans-phonon effects in ultra-fast nanodevices. Nanotechnology 19, 255705 (2008)

    2008

  130. [138]

    Chen, C. et al. Nanoscale fluid-structure interaction: Flow resistance and energy transfer between water and carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. E 84 (2011)

    2011

  131. [139]

    J., Woolf, T

    Michaud-Agrawal, N., Denning, E. J., Woolf, T. B. & Beckstein, O. Mdanalysis: a toolkit for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 2319–2327 (2011)

    2011

  132. [140]

    Gowers, R. J. et al. Mdanalysis: a python package for the rapid analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. Tech. Rep., Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States) (2019). 53

    2019

  133. [141]

    Theobald, D. L. Rapid calculation of rmsds using a quaternion-based charac- teristic polynomial. Acta Crystallogr. A 61, 478–480 (2005)

    2005

  134. [142]

    Liu, P., Agrafiotis, D. K. & Theobald, D. L. Fast determination of the optimal rotational matrix for macromolecular superpositions. J. Comput. Chem. 31, 1561–1563 (2009)

    2009

  135. [143]

    Boehler, J. P. Introduction to the Invariant Formulation of Anisotropic Constitutive Equations, 13–30 (Springer Vienna, 1987)

    1987

  136. [144]

    Evans, E. A. & Skalak, R. Mechanics and thermodynamics of biomembranes (CRC-Press, 1980)

    1980

  137. [145]

    & Mukhopadhyay, R

    Lim HW, G., Wortis, M. & Mukhopadhyay, R. Red Blood Cell Shapes and Shape Transformations: Newtonian Mechanics of a Composite Membrane: Sections 2.1–2.4. Soft Matter: Lipid Bilayers and Red Blood Cells 4, 83–139 (2008)

    2008

  138. [146]

    & Gekle, S

    Guckenberger, A. & Gekle, S. Theory and algorithms to compute Helfrich bending forces: a review. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29, 203001 (2017)

    2017

  139. [147]

    & Peliti, L

    Nelson, D. & Peliti, L. Fluctuations in membranes with crystalline and hexatic order. Journal de Physique 48, 1085–1092 (1987)

    1987

  140. [148]

    The morphology of vesicles of higher topological genus: Conformal degeneracy and conformal modes

    J¨ ulicher, F. The morphology of vesicles of higher topological genus: Conformal degeneracy and conformal modes. Journal de Physique II 6, 1797–1824 (1996)

    1996

  141. [149]

    & Kroll, D

    Gompper, G. & Kroll, D. M. Random surface discretizations and the renor- malization of the bending rigidity. Journal de Physique I 6, 1305–1320 (1996)

    1996

  142. [150]

    & Barr, A

    Meyer, M., Desbrun, M., Schr¨ oder, P. & Barr, A. H. Discrete Differential- Geometry Operators for Triangulated 2-Manifolds , 35–57 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2003)

    2003

  143. [151]

    Fedosov, D. A. Multiscale modeling of blood flow and soft matter (Brown University, 2010)

    2010

  144. [152]

    Ueber ein Knickungsproblem an der Kugelschale (Buchdr

    Zoelly, R. Ueber ein Knickungsproblem an der Kugelschale (Buchdr. Z¨ urcher & Furrer, 1915)

    1915

  145. [153]

    Chen, S., Phan-Thien, N., Khoo, B. C. & Fan, X. J. Flow around spheres by dissipative particle dynamics. Phys. Fluids 18, 103605 (2006)

    2006

  146. [154]

    Yaghoubi, S., Shirani, E., Pishevar, A. R. & Afshar, Y. New modified weight function for the dissipative force in the DPD method to increase the Schmidt number. EPL 110, 24002 (2015). 54

    2015

  147. [155]

    A., Caswell, B., Popel, A

    Fedosov, D. A., Caswell, B., Popel, A. S. & Karniadakis, G. E. Blood flow and cell-free layer in microvessels. Microcirculation 17, 615–628 (2010)

    2010

  148. [156]

    A., Caswell, B

    Pan, W., Fedosov, D. A., Caswell, B. & Karniadakis, G. E. Predicting dynamics and rheology of blood flow: A comparative study of multiscale and low-dimensional models of red blood cells. Microvasc. Res. 82, 163–170 (2011)

    2011

  149. [157]

    A., Pan, W., Caswell, B., Gompper, G

    Fedosov, D. A., Pan, W., Caswell, B., Gompper, G. & Karniadakis, G. E. Pre- dicting human blood viscosity in silico. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 11772–11777 (2011)

    2011

  150. [158]

    Marmottant, P., Bouakaz, A., Jong, N. d. & Quilliet, C. Buckling resistance of solid shell bubbles under ultrasound. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129, 1231–1239 (2011)

    2011

  151. [159]

    On sound scattering and attenuation of Albunex ® bubbles

    Ye, Z. On sound scattering and attenuation of Albunex ® bubbles. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100, 2011–2028 (1996). 55

    1996

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.