pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.00501 · v5 · submitted 2025-05-01 · ✦ hep-th · math-ph· math.MP· math.QA· math.SG

Minimal Factorization of Chern-Simons Theory -- Gravitational Anyonic Edge Modes

Thomas G. Mertens , Qi-Feng Wu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 17:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th math-phmath.MPmath.QAmath.SG
keywords Chern-Simons theoryedge modesquantum groupsthree-dimensional gravitytopological entanglement entropyBekenstein-Hawking entropyfactorizationanyonic modes
0
0 comments X

The pith

A minimal set of edge modes in Chern-Simons theory factorizes the bulk state space of three-dimensional gravity via quantum group degrees of freedom.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a minimal factorization of Chern-Simons theory by adding the smallest set of edge modes that still respects the theory's topological invariance. These modes correspond to the degrees of freedom of a particle on a quantum group. When applied to three-dimensional gravity as a Chern-Simons theory with two SL(2,R) factors, the construction produces edge modes that split the bulk state space into factorized pieces. This result lines up with earlier suggestions that the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of 3d black holes equals topological entanglement entropy.

Core claim

The minimal factorization proposal for Chern-Simons theory gives rise to quantum group edge modes that factorize the bulk state space of 3d gravity, in agreement with proposals relating the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy in 3d gravity to topological entanglement entropy.

What carries the argument

The minimal factorization map, which adds the smallest collection of edge modes compatible with topological invariance and interprets them as the degrees of freedom of a particle on a quantum group.

If this is right

  • The bulk state space of 3d gravity factorizes using these quantum group edge modes.
  • The resulting factorization reproduces the relation between Bekenstein-Hawking entropy and topological entanglement entropy.
  • The same minimal construction applies to any Chern-Simons theory without invoking full CFT edge modes.
  • Entanglement in topological quantum field theories can be analyzed with these minimal anyonic degrees of freedom.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach may simplify entanglement calculations in other 3d quantum gravity models by reducing the number of extra modes required.
  • Analogous minimal factorizations could be tested in condensed-matter systems that realize anyonic statistics.
  • The quantum-group interpretation might connect directly to information-processing tasks in gravitational theories.

Load-bearing premise

A minimal set of edge modes exists that is compatible with the topological invariance of Chern-Simons theory and can be interpreted as the degrees of freedom of a particle on a quantum group without requiring additional structure.

What would settle it

An explicit computation in a concrete 3d gravity model showing that the proposed minimal edge modes neither factorize the bulk Hilbert space nor reproduce the expected entropy relations would disprove the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.00501 by Qi-Feng Wu, Thomas G. Mertens.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: The three colorful lines are Wilson lines anchoring on two physical boundaries (solid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: We identify all edge states that only differ by moving the Wilson line endpoint on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The annulus on the left is homotopy equivalent to a disc with a puncture (red dot). The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Spatial annulus with orientation of the two boundary circles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Visualization of the crossing Wilson line algebra with a contribution from the intersection [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Splitting a Wilson line W(x +, x−) into two one-sided non-local Wilson lines W(x +) and W−1 (x −) that end on the entangling surface (dashed line). This leads to the gluing map:16 P⊙ × P⊙ ↠ P⊚, (2.53) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: We decompose the non-local operator W(x) into two local group-valued contributions g(x) and h localized on an outer boundary, and the entangling surface respectively. The degree of freedom h can be interpreted as the gauge Poisson-Lie symmetry (2.56) physicalized on the entangling surface. Since g(x) and h live on distinct boundaries, we impose locality {g(x), h} = 0. (3.2) Moreover, {g1(x1), g2(x2)} satis… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The monodromy variable m is not spatially connected to the outer boundary, but is a winding one loop around the entangling surface (here represented shrunk down to a puncture). Note that we need to keep track of a marked point on the puncture to distinguish physically different monodromies m. Second, the monodromy generates a "translation" of the coordinate h. More precisely, combining Eq. (2.70), (3.1), a… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Two different notions of “classical limits" [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Cutting an annulus with a Kac-Moody algebra of edge states on either side of the cut. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Annulus with arbitrary radial cut depicted for the function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

One approach to analyzing entanglement in a gauge theory is embedding it into a factorized theory with edge modes on the entangling boundary. For topological quantum field theories (TQFT), this naturally leads to factorizing a TQFT by adding local edge modes associated with the corresponding CFT. In this work, we instead construct a minimal set of edge modes compatible with the topological invariance of Chern-Simons theory. This leads us to propose a minimal factorization map. These minimal edge modes can be interpreted as the degrees of freedom of a particle on a quantum group. Of particular interest is three-dimensional gravity as a Chern-Simons theory with gauge group SL$(2,\mathbb{R}) \times$ SL$(2,\mathbb{R})$. Our minimal factorization proposal uniquely gives rise to quantum group edge modes factorizing the bulk state space of 3d gravity. This agrees with earlier proposals that relate the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy in 3d gravity to topological entanglement entropy.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes constructing a minimal set of edge modes for Chern-Simons theory that are compatible with its topological invariance, leading to a minimal factorization map. These edge modes are interpreted as the degrees of freedom of a particle on a quantum group. For three-dimensional gravity formulated as an SL(2,R) × SL(2,R) Chern-Simons theory, the proposal is claimed to uniquely produce quantum group edge modes that factorize the bulk state space, consistent with prior relations between the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy and topological entanglement entropy.

Significance. If the central construction holds without additional assumptions, the result would provide a parameter-free route to edge-mode factorization in topological theories and a direct link between anyonic quantum-group structures and gravitational entanglement in 3d, strengthening the connection between bulk entropy and boundary topological data.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and minimal factorization construction] Abstract and the definition of the minimal factorization map: the claim that minimality alone 'uniquely gives rise to quantum group edge modes' is load-bearing for the central result, yet the provided description does not demonstrate whether the identification of the edge Hilbert space with a specific anyonic representation category is derived from the factorization condition or inserted to reproduce known quantum-group data. For the non-compact SL(2,R) case, continuous-series representations are involved; any implicit truncation or choice of highest-weight module would constitute additional structure that the minimality criterion is supposed to avoid.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract references agreement with earlier proposals relating Bekenstein-Hawking entropy to topological entanglement entropy; explicit citations and a brief comparison of the resulting entropy formulas would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and constructive feedback. We address the major comment on the abstract and minimal factorization construction below, providing clarification on the derivation while agreeing to strengthen the exposition in revision.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and the definition of the minimal factorization map: the claim that minimality alone 'uniquely gives rise to quantum group edge modes' is load-bearing for the central result, yet the provided description does not demonstrate whether the identification of the edge Hilbert space with a specific anyonic representation category is derived from the factorization condition or inserted to reproduce known quantum-group data. For the non-compact SL(2,R) case, continuous-series representations are involved; any implicit truncation or choice of highest-weight module would constitute additional structure that the minimality criterion is supposed to avoid.

    Authors: The minimal factorization is defined by demanding the smallest set of edge modes such that the Chern-Simons state space on a manifold with boundary factorizes into independent left and right sectors while preserving exact topological invariance (i.e., no local bulk degrees of freedom are added). This requirement forces the edge Hilbert space to carry the structure of the modular tensor category associated with the quantum group at the given level; the fusion rules, braiding, and anyonic statistics are not inserted by hand but follow directly from the consistency of the factorization map with the TQFT axioms. For the SL(2,R) × SL(2,R) theory of 3d gravity we work with the full continuous-series representations of the non-compact group, which are the natural unitary representations compatible with the hyperbolic geometry and the asymptotic boundary conditions; no truncation to highest-weight modules or discrete series is performed. We will revise the manuscript to include an explicit, step-by-step derivation showing how the factorization condition alone selects the quantum-group data, thereby addressing the concern that the identification might appear ad hoc. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation constructs minimal edge modes from topological invariance without reduction to inputs

full rationale

The abstract presents a construction of minimal edge modes defined solely by compatibility with the topological invariance of Chern-Simons theory, which then leads to a factorization map whose modes are interpreted as quantum-group particle degrees of freedom. This is framed as a proposal that uniquely yields the factorization for SL(2,R) x SL(2,R) gravity, with consistency noted to prior entropy proposals rather than foundational reliance. No equations or self-citation chains are exhibited that would reduce the central claim to a fitted parameter, renamed input, or unverified self-citation by construction. The derivation remains self-contained on the stated minimality and invariance assumptions, with the quantum-group interpretation arising as an output rather than a presupposed input.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The construction rests on the existence of a minimal edge-mode set compatible with topological invariance and on the equivalence of 3d gravity to SL(2,R) x SL(2,R) Chern-Simons theory; no explicit free parameters or invented entities with independent evidence are stated in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Chern-Simons theory admits a factorization by adding local edge modes while preserving topological invariance.
    Invoked to justify seeking a minimal rather than full CFT set of modes.
invented entities (1)
  • minimal edge modes interpreted as particle on a quantum group no independent evidence
    purpose: To provide the degrees of freedom for the minimal factorization
    Proposed interpretation of the constructed modes; no independent falsifiable evidence given in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5711 in / 1339 out tokens · 36218 ms · 2026-05-22T17:28:08.084672+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

120 extracted references · 120 canonical work pages · 51 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Holographic Derivation of Entanglement Entropy from AdS/CFT

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,”Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 181602,arXiv:hep-th/0603001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  2. [2]

    Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement,

    M. Van Raamsdonk, “Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement,”Gen. Rel. Grav.42(2010) 2323–2329,arXiv:1005.3035 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2010

  3. [3]

    Decomposition of entanglement entropy in lattice gauge theory

    W. Donnelly, “Decomposition of entanglement entropy in lattice gauge theory,” Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 085004,arXiv:1109.0036 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  4. [4]

    Entanglement entropy in gauge theories and the holographic principle for electric strings

    P. V. Buividovich and M. I. Polikarpov, “Entanglement entropy in gauge theories and the holographic principle for electric strings,”Phys. Lett. B670(2008) 141–145, arXiv:0806.3376 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  5. [5]

    Remarks on entanglement entropy for gauge fields

    H. Casini, M. Huerta, and J. A. Rosabal, “Remarks on entanglement entropy for gauge fields,”Phys. Rev. D89no. 8, (2014) 085012,arXiv:1312.1183 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    Entanglement entropy and nonabelian gauge symmetry

    W. Donnelly, “Entanglement entropy and nonabelian gauge symmetry,”Class. Quant. Grav.31no. 21, (2014) 214003,arXiv:1406.7304 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  7. [7]

    Comments on Defining Entanglement Entropy

    J. Lin and D. Radičević, “Comments on defining entanglement entropy,”Nucl. Phys. B958(2020) 115118,arXiv:1808.05939 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    On The Entanglement Entropy For Gauge Theories

    S. Ghosh, R. M. Soni, and S. P. Trivedi, “On The Entanglement Entropy For Gauge Theories,”JHEP09(2015) 069,arXiv:1501.02593 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  9. [9]

    Geometric entropy and edge modes of the electromagnetic field

    W. Donnelly and A. C. Wall, “Geometric entropy and edge modes of the electromagnetic field,”Phys. Rev. D94no. 10, (2016) 104053,arXiv:1506.05792 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  10. [10]

    Edge State Quantization: Vector Fields in Rindler

    A. Blommaert, T. G. Mertens, H. Verschelde, and V. I. Zakharov, “Edge State Quantization: Vector Fields in Rindler,”JHEP08(2018) 196,arXiv:1801.09910 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    Edge Dynamics from the Path Integral: Maxwell and Yang-Mills

    A. Blommaert, T. G. Mertens, and H. Verschelde, “Edge dynamics from the path integral — Maxwell and Yang-Mills,”JHEP11(2018) 080,arXiv:1804.07585 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Extended actions, dynamics of edge modes, and entanglement entropy,

    M. Geiller and P. Jai-akson, “Extended actions, dynamics of edge modes, and entanglement entropy,”JHEP09(2020) 134,arXiv:1912.06025 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    Entanglement branes in a two-dimensional string theory

    W. Donnelly and G. Wong, “Entanglement branes in a two-dimensional string theory,”JHEP09(2017) 097,arXiv:1610.01719 [hep-th]. 43

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    Entanglement branes, modular flow, and extended topological quantum field theory,

    W. Donnelly and G. Wong, “Entanglement branes, modular flow, and extended topological quantum field theory,”JHEP10(2019) 016,arXiv:1811.10785 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    Entanglement entropy and edge modes in topological string theory. Part I. Generalized entropy for closed strings,

    W. Donnelly, Y. Jiang, M. Kim, and G. Wong, “Entanglement entropy and edge modes in topological string theory. Part I. Generalized entropy for closed strings,” JHEP10(2021) 201,arXiv:2010.15737 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Entanglement entropy and edge modes in topological string theory. Part II. The dual gauge theory story,

    Y. Jiang, M. Kim, and G. Wong, “Entanglement entropy and edge modes in topological string theory. Part II. The dual gauge theory story,”JHEP10(2021) 202,arXiv:2012.13397 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Edge theory approach to topological entanglement entropy, mutual information and entanglement negativity in Chern-Simons theories

    X. Wen, S. Matsuura, and S. Ryu, “Edge theory approach to topological entanglement entropy, mutual information and entanglement negativity in Chern-Simons theories,”Phys. Rev. B93no. 24, (2016) 245140,arXiv:1603.08534 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    A note on entanglement edge modes in Chern Simons theory

    G. Wong, “A note on entanglement edge modes in Chern Simons theory,”JHEP08 (2018) 020,arXiv:1706.04666 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    Edge modes and corner ambiguities in 3d Chern-Simons theory and gravity

    M. Geiller, “Edge modes and corner ambiguities in 3d Chern–Simons theory and gravity,”Nucl. Phys. B924(2017) 312–365,arXiv:1703.04748 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    Interfaces and the extended Hilbert space of Chern-Simons theory,

    J. R. Fliss and R. G. Leigh, “Interfaces and the extended Hilbert space of Chern-Simons theory,”JHEP07(2020) 009,arXiv:2004.05123 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    Extended phase space in general gauge theories,

    M. S. Klinger, R. G. Leigh, and P.-C. Pai, “Extended phase space in general gauge theories,”Nucl. Phys. B998(2024) 116404,arXiv:2303.06786 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Drinfeld center of enriched monoidal categories,

    L. Kong and H. Zheng, “Drinfeld center of enriched monoidal categories,”Advances in Mathematics323(2018) 411–426

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Enriched monoidal categories i: centers,

    L. Kong, W. Yuan, Z.-H. Zhang, and H. Zheng, “Enriched monoidal categories i: centers,”Quantum Topology(2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    A proposal for 3d quantum gravity and its bulk factorization,

    T. G. Mertens, J. Simón, and G. Wong, “A proposal for 3d quantum gravity and its bulk factorization,”JHEP06(2023) 134,arXiv:2210.14196 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy as Topological Entanglement Entropy

    L. McGough and H. Verlinde, “Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy as Topological Entanglement Entropy,”JHEP11(2013) 208,arXiv:1308.2342 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  26. [26]

    On entanglement entropy in non-Abelian lattice gauge theory and 3D quantum gravity

    C. Delcamp, B. Dittrich, and A. Riello, “On entanglement entropy in non-Abelian lattice gauge theory and 3D quantum gravity,”JHEP11(2016) 102, arXiv:1609.04806 [hep-th]. 44

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  27. [27]

    Multipartite edge modes and tensor networks,

    C. Akers, R. M. Soni, and A. Y. Wei, “Multipartite edge modes and tensor networks,”SciPost Phys. Core7(2024) 070,arXiv:2404.03651 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    On the origin of the quantum group symmetry in 3d quantum gravity,

    M. Dupuis, L. Freidel, F. Girelli, A. Osumanu, and J. Rennert, “On the origin of the quantum group symmetry in 3d quantum gravity,”arXiv:2006.10105 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2006

  29. [29]

    Hartle-Hawking state and its factorization in 3d gravity,

    W. Z. Chua and Y. Jiang, “Hartle-Hawking state and its factorization in 3d gravity,” JHEP03(2024) 135,arXiv:2309.05126 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Deriving the non-perturbative gravitational dual of quantum Liouville theory from BCFT operator algebra,

    L. Chen, L.-Y. Hung, Y. Jiang, and B.-X. Lao, “Deriving the non-perturbative gravitational dual of quantum Liouville theory from BCFT operator algebra,” SciPost Phys.19no. 6, (2025) 163,arXiv:2403.03179 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Fine Structure of Jackiw-Teitelboim Quantum Gravity,

    A. Blommaert, T. G. Mertens, and H. Verschelde, “Fine Structure of Jackiw-Teitelboim Quantum Gravity,”JHEP09(2019) 066,arXiv:1812.00918 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  32. [32]

    Quantum exponentials for the modular double and applications in gravity models,

    T. G. Mertens, “Quantum exponentials for the modular double and applications in gravity models,”JHEP09(2023) 106,arXiv:2212.07696 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Quantum group origins of edge states in double-scaled SYK,

    A. Belaey, T. G. Mertens, and T. Tappeiner, “Quantum group origins of edge states in double-scaled SYK,”arXiv:2503.20691 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  34. [34]

    Gauge Theories and Integrable Lattice Models,

    E. Witten, “Gauge Theories and Integrable Lattice Models,”Nucl. Phys. B322 (1989) 629–697

    work page 1989

  35. [35]

    Chern-Simons Holonomies and the Appearance of Quantum Groups,

    E. Guadagnini, M. Martellini, and M. Mintchev, “Chern-Simons Holonomies and the Appearance of Quantum Groups,”Phys. Lett. B235(1990) 275–281

    work page 1990

  36. [36]

    Braids and Quantum Group Symmetry in Chern-Simons Theory,

    E. Guadagnini, M. Martellini, and M. Mintchev, “Braids and Quantum Group Symmetry in Chern-Simons Theory,”Nucl. Phys. B336(1990) 581–609

    work page 1990

  37. [37]

    Hidden Quantum Symmetries in Rational Conformal Field Theories,

    L. Alvarez-Gaume, C. Gomez, and G. Sierra, “Hidden Quantum Symmetries in Rational Conformal Field Theories,”Nucl. Phys. B319(1989) 155–186

    work page 1989

  38. [38]

    Quantum Group Interpretation of Some Conformal Field Theories,

    L. Alvarez-Gaume, C. Gomez, and G. Sierra, “Quantum Group Interpretation of Some Conformal Field Theories,”Phys. Lett. B220(1989) 142–152

    work page 1989

  39. [39]

    Duality and Quantum Groups,

    L. Alvarez-Gaume, C. Gomez, and G. Sierra, “Duality and Quantum Groups,”Nucl. Phys. B330(1990) 347–398

    work page 1990

  40. [40]

    Classical origin of quantum group symmetries in Wess-Zumino-Witten conformal field theory,

    K. Gawedzki, “Classical origin of quantum group symmetries in Wess-Zumino-Witten conformal field theory,”Commun. Math. Phys.139(1991) 201–214. 45

    work page 1991

  41. [41]

    Quantum Groups and WZW Models,

    A. Alekseev and S. L. Shatashvili, “Quantum Groups and WZW Models,”Commun. Math. Phys.133(1990) 353–368

    work page 1990

  42. [42]

    Quantization of the Wess-Zumino-Witten model on a circle,

    M.-f. Chu, P. Goddard, I. Halliday, D. I. Olive, and A. Schwimmer, “Quantization of the Wess-Zumino-Witten model on a circle,”Phys. Lett. B266(1991) 71–81

    work page 1991

  43. [43]

    Lattice Wess-Zumino-Witten Model and Quantum Groups

    F. Falceto and K. Gawedzki, “Lattice Wess-Zumino-Witten model and quantum groups,”J. Geom. Phys.11(1993) 251–279,arXiv:hep-th/9209076

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  44. [44]

    An explicit construction of the quantum group in chiral WZW-models

    M. R. Gaberdiel, “An Explicit construction of the quantum group in chiral WZW models,”Commun. Math. Phys.173(1995) 357–378,arXiv:hep-th/9407186

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  45. [45]

    Quantum groups and nonabelian braiding in quantum Hall systems

    J. K. Slingerland and F. A. Bais, “Quantum groups and nonAbelian braiding in quantum Hall systems,”Nucl. Phys. B612(2001) 229–290, arXiv:cond-mat/0104035

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  46. [46]

    Poisson structure on moduli of flat connections on Riemann surfaces and r matrix,

    V. V. Fock and A. A. Rosly, “Poisson structure on moduli of flat connections on Riemann surfaces and r matrix,”Am. Math. Soc. Transl.191(1999) 67–86, arXiv:math/9802054

    work page arXiv 1999

  47. [47]

    Combinatorial quantization of the Hamiltonian Chern-Simons theory I

    A. Y. Alekseev, H. Grosse, and V. Schomerus, “Combinatorial quantization of the Hamiltonian Chern-Simons theory,”Commun. Math. Phys.172(1995) 317–358, arXiv:hep-th/9403066

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  48. [48]

    Combinatorial Quantization of the Hamiltonian Chern-Simons Theory II

    A. Y. Alekseev, H. Grosse, and V. Schomerus, “Combinatorial quantization of the Hamiltonian Chern-Simons theory. 2.,”Commun. Math. Phys.174(1995) 561–604, arXiv:hep-th/9408097

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  49. [49]

    Poisson structure and symmetry in the Chern-Simons formulation of (2+1)-dimensional gravity

    C. Meusburger and B. J. Schroers, “Poisson structure and symmetry in the Chern-Simons formulation of (2+1)-dimensional gravity,”Class. Quant. Grav.20 (2003) 2193–2234,arXiv:gr-qc/0301108

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  50. [50]

    Towards (3+1) gravity through Drinfel'd doubles with cosmological constant

    A. Ballesteros, F. J. Herranz, and P. Naranjo, “Towards ( 3+1 ) gravity through Drinfel’d doubles with cosmological constant,”Phys. Lett. B746(2015) 37–43, arXiv:1502.07518 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  51. [51]

    The Hilbert space of 3d gravity: quantum group symmetries and observables

    C. Meusburger and K. Noui, “The Hilbert space of 3d gravity: quantum group symmetries and observables,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.14no. 6, (2010) 1651–1715, arXiv:0809.2875 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  52. [52]

    The quantum gravity disk: Discrete current algebra,

    L. Freidel, C. Goeller, and E. R. Livine, “The quantum gravity disk: Discrete current algebra,”J. Math. Phys.62no. 10, (2021) 102303,arXiv:2103.13171 [hep-th]. 46

    work page arXiv 2021

  53. [53]

    Fusion basis for lattice gauge theory and loop quantum gravity

    C. Delcamp, B. Dittrich, and A. Riello, “Fusion basis for lattice gauge theory and loop quantum gravity,”JHEP02(2017) 061,arXiv:1607.08881 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  54. [54]

    Deformed phase space for 3d loop gravity and hyperbolic discrete geometries

    V. Bonzom, M. Dupuis, F. Girelli, and E. R. Livine, “Deformed phase space for 3d loop gravity and hyperbolic discrete geometries,”arXiv:1402.2323 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [55]

    Discretization of 3d gravity in different polarizations

    M. Dupuis, L. Freidel, and F. Girelli, “Discretization of 3d gravity in different polarizations,”Phys. Rev. D96no. 8, (2017) 086017,arXiv:1701.02439 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  56. [56]

    A Comment on Quantum Group Symmetry in Conformal Field Theory,

    G. W. Moore and N. Reshetikhin, “A Comment on Quantum Group Symmetry in Conformal Field Theory,”Nucl. Phys. B328(1989) 557–574

    work page 1989

  57. [57]

    Invariants of three manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups,

    N. Reshetikhin and V. G. Turaev, “Invariants of three manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups,”Invent. Math.103(1991) 547–597

    work page 1991

  58. [58]

    Local subsystems in gauge theory and gravity

    W. Donnelly and L. Freidel, “Local subsystems in gauge theory and gravity,”JHEP 09(2016) 102,arXiv:1601.04744 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  59. [59]

    Topological quantum field theory,

    M. F. Atiyah, “Topological quantum field theory,”Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS68(1988) 175–186

    work page 1988

  60. [60]

    Remarks on the Canonical Quantization of the Chern-Simons-Witten Theory,

    S. Elitzur, G. W. Moore, A. Schwimmer, and N. Seiberg, “Remarks on the Canonical Quantization of the Chern-Simons-Witten Theory,”Nucl. Phys. B326(1989) 108–134

    work page 1989

  61. [61]

    Babelon, D

    O. Babelon, D. Bernard, and M. Talon,Introduction to Classical Integrable Systems. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2003

    work page 2003

  62. [62]

    Grammaticos, Y

    B. Grammaticos, Y. Kosmann-Schwarzbach, and K. Tamizhmani,Integrability of nonlinear systems. Springer, 2004

    work page 2004

  63. [63]

    Carlip,Quantum gravity in 2+1 dimensions

    S. Carlip,Quantum gravity in 2+1 dimensions. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 12, 2003

    work page 2003

  64. [64]

    Invariant functions on lie groups and hamiltonian flows of surface group representations,

    W. M. Goldman, “Invariant functions on lie groups and hamiltonian flows of surface group representations,”Inventiones mathematicae85(1986) 263–302

    work page 1986

  65. [65]

    Skein quantization of poisson algebras of loops on surfaces,

    V. G. Turaev, “Skein quantization of poisson algebras of loops on surfaces,”Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure24no. 6, (1991) 635–704

    work page 1991

  66. [66]

    Dressing transformations and Poisson group actions,

    M. A. Semenov-Tian-Shansky, “Dressing transformations and Poisson group actions,”Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. Kyoto21(1985) 1237–1260. 47

    work page 1985

  67. [67]

    Chiral Extensions of the WZNW Phase Space, Poisson-Lie Symmetries and Groupoids

    J. Balog, L. Feher, and L. Palla, “Chiral extensions of the WZNW phase space, Poisson-Lie symmetries and groupoids,”Nucl. Phys. B568(2000) 503–542, arXiv:hep-th/9910046

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  68. [68]

    The Unraveling of the quantum group structure in the WZNW theory,

    A. Alekseev, L. D. Faddeev, M. Semenov-Tian-Shansky, and A. Volkov, “The Unraveling of the quantum group structure in the WZNW theory,”

    work page

  69. [69]

    Hidden quantum groups inside Kac-Moody algebra,

    A. Alekseev, L. D. Faddeev, and M. Semenov-Tian-Shansky, “Hidden quantum groups inside Kac-Moody algebra,”Commun. Math. Phys.149(1992) 335–345

    work page 1992

  70. [70]

    On the Exchange Matrix for WZNW Model,

    L. D. Faddeev, “On the Exchange Matrix for WZNW Model,”Commun. Math. Phys.132(1990) 131–138

    work page 1990

  71. [71]

    Integrable models in 1+ 1 dimensional quantum field theory,

    L. Faddeev, “Integrable models in 1+ 1 dimensional quantum field theory,” tech. rep., CEA Centre d’Etudes Nucleaires de Saclay, 1982

    work page 1982

  72. [72]

    Hamiltonian quantization of complex Chern-Simons theory at level-k,

    M. Han, “Hamiltonian quantization of complex Chern-Simons theory at level-k,” arXiv:2504.16367 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  73. [73]

    The Chiral WZNW Phase Space and its Poisson-Lie Groupoid

    J. Balog, L. Feher, and L. Palla, “The Chiral WZNW phase space and its Poisson-Lie groupoid,”Phys. Lett. B463(1999) 83–92,arXiv:hep-th/9907050

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  74. [74]

    Poisson-lie groups. the quantum duality principle and the twisted quantum double,

    M. Semenov-Tyan-Shanskii, “Poisson-lie groups. the quantum duality principle and the twisted quantum double,”Theoretical and Mathematical Physics93no. 2, (1992) 1292–1307

    work page 1992

  75. [75]

    On complete integrability of the landau-lifshitz equation,

    E. K. Sklyanin, “On complete integrability of the landau-lifshitz equation,” tech. rep., 1979

    work page 1979

  76. [76]

    Some algebraic structures connected with the yang–baxter equation,

    E. K. Sklyanin, “Some algebraic structures connected with the yang–baxter equation,”Funktsional’nyi Analiz i ego Prilozheniya16no. 4, (1982) 27–34

    work page 1982

  77. [77]

    Some algebraic structures connected with the Yang-Baxter equation,

    E. K. Sklyanin, “Some algebraic structures connected with the Yang-Baxter equation,”Funct. Anal. Appl.16(1982) 263–270

    work page 1982

  78. [78]

    Quantum groups,

    V. G. Drinfeld, “Quantum groups,”Zap. Nauchn. Semin.155(1986) 18–49

    work page 1986

  79. [79]

    Symplectic structures associated to Lie-Poisson groups

    A. Y. Alekseev and A. Z. Malkin, “Symplectic structures associated to Lie-Poisson groups,”Commun. Math. Phys.162(1994) 147–174,arXiv:hep-th/9303038

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  80. [80]

    Semenov-Tian-Shansky,Integrable systems: the r-matrix approach

    M. Semenov-Tian-Shansky,Integrable systems: the r-matrix approach. Research Inst. for Math. Sciences, Kyoto Univ., 2008. 48

    work page 2008

Showing first 80 references.