Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 57 references

Holographic Conformal Anomaly and a-Theorem in 5D Scalar-Tensor Theories from Heterotic Strings

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single α′-corrected heterotic string action yields two inequivalent five-dimensional scalar-tensor theories, and this paper derives their full holographic conformal anomalies in closed form and proves a holographic a-theorem in the…

desk verdict The coefficient-frame KK mechanism is a real idea and the Lovelock-Horndeski branch is worth a look, but the EdGB central-charge formula has a load-bearing consistency problem and the draft is unfinished. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.01310 v2 pith:MSJGWMSX submitted 2025-05-02 hep-th gr-qc

Tianhao Wu , Michael Stone This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc MSC 81T3083E3081T4083C57 PACS 11.25.-w11.25.Tq04.50.Kd
keywords holographicconformalanomalyKaluza-KleinreductionheteroticstringeffectiveactionEinstein-dilaton-Gauss-BonnetLovelock-Horndeskigravitya-theoremlineardilatonFefferman-Grahamexpansion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the ten-dimensional heterotic string effective action, through the freedom to choose different coefficient frames at order α′, gives a unified origin for two distinct five-dimensional scalar-tensor theories: Einstein-dilaton-Gauss-Bonnet and Lovelock-Horndeski. For each theory it derives the complete four-dimensional holographic conformal anomaly, including closed-form central charges a(γ,λ) and c(γ,λ), and it constructs exact asymptotically AdS solutions with a linear dilaton profile in the Lovelock-Horndeski case. The central charges convert string-theoretic couplings directly into constraints on the dual CFT, such as the positivity of a and c and the collider bound 0 < c/a < 3/2. The paper also establishes a holographic a-theorem, showing a monotonic decrease of a constructed a-function from the ultraviolet to the infrared, even in the non-unitary branch with negative central charges. If correct, these results show that AdS/CFT remains consistent and predictive when non-minimal scalar couplings and higher-curvature terms are present.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the coefficient-frame ambiguity of the ten-dimensional heterotic string effective action: different choices of the undetermined α′ coefficients, equivalent in ten dimensions, become physically distinct after Kaluza-Klein reduction, generating the EdGB and Lovelock-Horndeski actions. The anomaly computation itself runs on the Fefferman-Graham expansion of the asymptotically AdS5 metric, which organizes the bulk fields into boundary data and produces the Weyl anomaly through the on-shell action; in the linear-dilaton case the scalar field acquires a logarithmic Fefferman-Graham branch. The a-theorem is carried by a constructed flow function a(r), defined through the domain-wall scale factor A(r) and the running dilaton profile, whose monotonicity follows from the null energy condition applied to additional matter.

What would settle it

Compute the EdGB central charges by an independent holographic method—for example, from the boundary stress-tensor two-point function or from entanglement entropy across a sphere—and check whether a and c reproduce Eq. (14); alternatively, drop the relation $e^{{−γφ(0)}}$ = ℓ²/(3α(3η−1)), repeat the Fefferman-Graham expansion, and see whether a consistent anomaly and a-theorem still emerge.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the α′-corrected ten-dimensional heterotic effective action, reduced on a consistent Kaluza-Klein ansatz in two carefully chosen coefficient frames, produces two inequivalent five-dimensional scalar-tensor theories, and that for both theories the full holographic Weyl anomaly of the four-dimensional boundary CFT can be obtained in closed form. For the Einstein-dilaton-Gauss-Bonnet theory, the anomaly coefficients are given by central charges a = (ℓ³)/(8λ(9γ−λ))(27γ²−66γλ+19λ²) and c = (ℓ³)/(24λ(9γ−λ))(81γ²−126γλ+49λ²). For the Lovelock-Horndeski theory, the gravitational sector yields a = −5ℓ³/8 and c = −ℓ³/8 in the non-critical case, and a and c depending on the dilaton logarithmic prefactor φ_s in the critical linear-dilaton case, alongside new b-type anomaly charges. The paper further claims that the Lovelock-Horndeski theory admits an exact AdS5 solution with linear dilaton φ(r) = χ log r, and that a monotonically decreasing a-function can be constructed along holographic RG flows, thereby establishing a holographic a-theorem in both critical and non-critical settings.

Load-bearing premise

The closed-form central charges for the Einstein-dilaton-Gauss-Bonnet theory hold only if the variational relation $e^{{−γφ(0)}}$ = ℓ²/(3α(3η−1)) is a genuine holographic boundary condition rather than an artifact of the calculation, and the a-theorem furthermore assumes the extra matter obeys the null energy condition.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The closed-form EdGB central charges turn the universal CFT bounds, including the conformal-collider constraint 0 < c/a < 3/2, into an explicit admissible region in the (γ,λ) coupling plane.
  • The Lovelock-Horndeski non-critical branch has negative central charges, so the dual four-dimensional theory is non-unitary or logarithmic, yet it still admits a monotonic a-function and a well-defined RG hierarchy.
  • The linear-dilaton critical branch breaks full conformal invariance while keeping scale invariance, producing new b-type anomaly charges and giving a concrete holographic realization of generalized conformal branes.
  • A single ten-dimensional string action, through two distinct vacua, provides a top-down origin for two inequivalent AdS5 scalar-tensor theories whose higher-curvature corrections are fully controlled by string theory.
  • After a further S1 compactification, the EdGB theory connects to four-dimensional dilatonic Gauss-Bonnet gravity, so the anomaly bounds supply model-independent priors for gravitational-wave and scalarization phenomenology.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same coefficient-frame mechanism could plausibly generate additional inequivalent five-dimensional theories from non-toroidal internal spaces or from different dilaton potentials, extending the two-branch structure to a family of holographic models.
  • Because the EdGB central charges are explicit functions of two couplings, they offer a direct target for an independent extraction by holographic entanglement entropy across a sphere; agreement would test the boundary condition that fixes the AdS scale in terms of the Gauss-Bonnet coupling.
  • The non-unitary Lovelock-Horndeski branch with a monotonic a-function could serve as a controlled laboratory for logarithmic CFTs, where the negative central charge encodes the density of negative-norm states and controls logarithmic pairings; one could test this against the partition function of the conjectured log-CFT dual.
  • If the linear-dilaton boundary interpretation is correct, the new b-type charges b1 and b2 should appear in other holographic observables such as entanglement entropy or two-point functions, providing testable signatures beyond the anomaly itself.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to derive two five-dimensional scalar-tensor actions—Einstein-dilaton–Gauss–Bonnet (EdGB) and Lovelock–Horndeski—from the α′-corrected ten-dimensional heterotic effective action by exploiting coefficient-frame ambiguities and consistent Kaluza–Klein reduction. It then presents holographic computations of the boundary conformal anomaly for both theories: closed-form central charges a(γ,λ), c(γ,λ) for EdGB in Eq. (14), and a,c for Lovelock–Horndeski in Eqs. (16) and (18), together with new b-type charges in the linear-dilaton case. The paper also reports an exact asymptotically AdS solution with linear dilaton and states a holographic a-theorem for the Lovelock–Horndeski branch, using domain-wall flows and the null energy condition.

Significance. The potential significance is genuine: closed-form anomaly coefficients for two higher-derivative scalar-tensor theories would provide concrete holographic data for testing collider and positivity bounds, and a monotone a-function for a linear-dilaton Horndeski model would extend known holographic renormalization-group results. The explicit Kaluza–Klein reduction identities in Appendix D and the exact AdS solution with linear dilaton in Appendix B are checkable and potentially useful. However, the paper does not currently establish these central claims: the EdGB anomaly derivation is internally inconsistent, the Lovelock–Horndeski anomaly derivation contains a missing load-bearing equation, and the a-theorem proof relies on unproved inequalities and an auxiliary matter sector.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix C.2, Eq. (C12) and Eq. (14)] The derivation of the EdGB central charges is not supported by the bulk equations of motion. Varying the anomalous action with respect to φ(2) yields λΛ e^{λφ0} = −108αγ ℓ⁻⁴ e^{-γφ0}, and varying with respect to g(2) gives e^{-γφ0} = ℓ²/[3α(3η−1)]. For action (4), the scalar equation for constant φ0 is λΛ e^{λφ0} + αγ e^{-γφ0} L_GB = 0, so these conditions force L_GB = 108/ℓ⁴. In an AdS₅ background of radius ℓ, however, L_GB = R_{abcd}R^{abcd} − 4R_{ab}R^{ab} + R² = 120/ℓ⁴, with either sign convention for the curvature. The 108/120 mismatch is not a sign ambiguity. Thus the Fefferman–Graham data used to compute Eq. (14) do not solve the bulk theory, and the constraint e^{-γφ0} = ℓ²/[3α(3η−1)] is an artifact of varying over non-source coefficients φ(2) and g(2). Eq. (14) is therefore not established as the physical holographic anomaly.
  2. [Appendix C.1, Eq. (C11)] The Lovelock–Horndeski anomaly derivation contains a missing load-bearing step: after Eq. (C10) the text reads “Substituting the expressions for g(1)_ab and φ(1) into equation (XX)”, but no equation (XX) appears anywhere in the manuscript. This omitted equation is precisely the relation that determines g(1)_ab (Eq. C11) and therefore controls the final anomaly (17) and central charges (18). Without it the derivation cannot be checked. This is a substantive omission, not a typographical issue.
  3. [Section 7, Eqs. (19)–(20)] The a-theorem proof is incomplete in both cases. In the non-critical case, A″(r) ≥ 0 is asserted immediately after writing a null-energy-condition expression, with no demonstration that the Horndeski field configurations satisfy the NEC for the effective matter stress tensor. In the linear-dilaton case, the stated a′(r) is a rational function whose numerator is asserted to be positive “with the above constraint” without proof; the displayed expression contains only A″ and no φ″ terms even though the flow function (20) depends on φ′. Because the monotonicity conclusion a′(r) > 0 rests entirely on these unproved inequalities, the claimed holographic a-theorem is not established.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 6, Eqs. (17)–(18)] The notation for the linear-dilaton slope is inconsistent: Eq. (17) uses χ while Eq. (18) uses φ_s, and the relation between χ and φ_s is never stated.
  2. [Appendix C.2, Eqs. (C13)–(C15)] The coefficients are listed as E1–E17, but the anomalous action in Eq. (C13) is written with C_i; the mapping from E_i to C_i and the algebraic steps that combine them into Eq. (14) are not shown.
  3. [Section 5] The paper states that numerical EdGB black hole solutions are obtained, but no numerical data, plots, boundary conditions, or convergence checks are presented; this part of the paper is unverifiable as written.
  4. [Sections 3–4 and Appendix D] The coefficient-frame selection is not made explicit: the claim that “one of the coefficients {a_i} is prefixed” and that four coefficients are cancelled is never substantiated with the specific coefficient choices used to obtain actions (4) and (6).
  5. [Throughout] There are numerous typographical errors (“Thoery”, “Hournal”, “with coefficients{Ci} are given”), inconsistent equation references (Appendix A refers to theory (7) while the action is numbered (6)), and unclear notation such as the reuse of α for both the reduction parameter and the Gauss–Bonnet coupling.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the anomaly coefficients and a-functions are derived by holographic renormalization from the stated actions, and the a-theorem monotonicity is proven from the Null Energy Condition rather than assumed.

full rationale

The paper’s derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce any claimed result to its own inputs. For the EdGB theory, the action (4) is fixed, the Fefferman–Graham expansion (10)–(12) is applied, and the anomaly coefficients in Eq. (14) are obtained as the coefficients of boundary curvature invariants in the renormalized action. The relation e^{-γφ(0)} = ℓ²/[3α(3η−1)] is derived from stationarity conditions in Appendix C.2 rather than imposed to match Eq. (14); whether that stationarity condition is physically justified for AdS5 is a correctness question, not a circularity. For the Lovelock–Horndeski theory, the action (6) is obtained by KK reduction, the exact solution (9) is verified against the equations of motion in Appendix B, and the central charges (16) and (18) are computed from the FG expansion, not quoted from prior work. The holographic a-theorem section does not circularly assume monotonicity: the functions (19) and (20) are chosen so that at the fixed point they reduce to the computed central charges, following the standard Myers–Sinha method [25], and the inequalities a′(r) ≥ 0 or a′(r) > 0 are then derived from the Null Energy Condition and the bulk equations. This is the usual holographic consistency check, not a fit disguised as a prediction. The only self-citation, Ref. [27], appears alongside other KK-reduction references and is not load-bearing. The possible off-shell AdS issue raised by the skeptic is an internal-consistency concern, but the paper does not fit parameters to data or define its targets in terms of its outputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central results depend on the coefficient-frame selection, the KK truncation, the holographic dictionary, and the NEC; none are proven in the text. There are no genuinely new entities beyond the effective couplings and the linear-dilaton parameter χ.

free parameters (2)
  • 10D coefficient-frame choices (a_i, b_i) = chosen to cancel non-Horndeski terms
    The derivation relies on selecting coefficients in Eq. (2)/(5) via Tseytlin's coefficient ambiguity; the physical uniqueness of this choice is not established.
  • KK reduction ansatz parameters (α, β, λ_internal) = LH: α=0, nβ=2, k=0; EdGB: not fully specified
    These are chosen by hand to remove exponential prefactors and internal curvature; the EdGB case lacks explicit values.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The ten-dimensional α′-corrected heterotic effective action (Eq. 2) with arbitrary coefficient frame is a valid starting point.
    The entire derivation reduces this action; the Tseytlin coefficient ambiguity is invoked without proving the chosen frames are physically distinct.
  • domain assumption The Kaluza-Klein reduction ansatz with maximally symmetric internal space and zero-mode truncation is consistent.
    The reduction keeps only the lowest Kaluza-Klein mode of the dilaton and assumes the internal metric form; massive modes and backreaction are neglected.
  • domain assumption The Fefferman-Graham expansion and holographic renormalization dictionary apply to these higher-curvature scalar-tensor theories.
    The anomaly is read from the on-shell action expanded near the AdS boundary; the paper does not justify this beyond citing standard references.
  • domain assumption The Null Energy Condition holds for the additional matter in the a-theorem proof.
    The monotonicity of a(r) is conditioned on NEC of the matter stress tensor in Section 7.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Holographic Conformal Anomaly and a-Theorem in 5D Scalar-Tensor Theories from Heterotic Strings." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MSJGWMSX

@misc{pith2026250501310,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Holographic Conformal Anomaly and a-Theorem in 5D Scalar-Tensor Theories from Heterotic Strings},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MSJGWMSX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.01310}
}
read the original abstract

We present a novel derivation of the full holographic conformal anomaly in two five-dimensional scalar-tensor theories-one Lovelock-Horndeski type and one Einstein-dilaton-Gauss-Bonnet-obtained via a unified mechanism for Kaluza-Klein reduction of the ten-dimensional heterotic string effective action. In the Lovelock-Horndeski case, we also construct exact asymptotically AdS solutions with linear dilaton profiles and establish a holographic a-theorem. Our results confirm the consistency of AdS/CFT in the presence of non-minimal scalar couplings and higher curvature terms, and show how string-theoretic modifications control the emergence of conformal anomalies and constrain the RG structure of dual field theories.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Holographic Conformal Anomaly and a-Theorem in 5D Scalar-Tensor Theories from Heterotic Strings

    INTRODUCTION The Anti–de Sitter/Conformal Field Theory (AdS/CFT) correspondence continues to reshape our understanding of quantum gravity by establishing a duality between bulk gravitational dynam- ics and boundary field theories. In this framework, the on-shell action of a ( d + 1)–dimensional AdS gravity theory, evaluated with specified boundary data, e...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    We focus on the solutions-particularly asymptotically AdS solutions- of resulting theories

    KALUZA-KLEIN REDUCTION ON STRING EFFECTIVE THEORY We consider the string effective theory given with different coefficients combinations(“frame”) and obtain different corresponding lower dimensional actions. We focus on the solutions-particularly asymptotically AdS solutions- of resulting theories. It is known that to the α′-correction, the most general f...

    work page

  3. [3]

    EINSTEIN-DILATON-GAUSS-BONNET THEORY Choosing coefficient frame that gives Gauss-Bonnet combination and vanishing nonlocal terms, we have the action in the form S = 1 16πGD Z dDx√−ge−2ˆΦ ˆR + 4 ∇ˆΦ 2−e ˜λˆΦΛ (3) + α′ ˆLGB +a1 ˆRAB∇A ˆΦ∇B ˆΦ +a2 ˆR ∇ˆΦ 2 +a3 ∇ˆΦ 2□ˆΦ +a4 ∇ˆΦ 4 with{ai} being undetermined coefficients and we include a dilaton potential term...

    work page

  4. [4]

    LOVELOCK-HORNDESKI THEORY We also consider another string effective theory giving rise to different lower dimensional theo- ries. Consider the following action S = 1 16πGD Z dDx p −ˆge−2ˆΦ ˆR + 4 ∇ˆΦ 2 +˜α ˆLGB +a1 ˆRµν∇µ ˆΦ∇ν ˆΦ +a2R ∇ˆΦ 2 +a3(∇ˆΦ)2□ˆΦ +a4(∇ˆΦ)4 (5) For the reduction ansatz dˆs2 D =e2αϕds2 d +e2βϕdΩ2 n the variables α = 0 and β is set to...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Using standard boundary conditions and suitable ansatz, we solve numerically for black hole solutions in the effective theory (4)

    SOLUTIONS TO LOWER DIMENSIONAL THEORIES For the EdGB theory, there existed numerical Black Hole solutions representing stable asymp- totically AdS black holes with scalar hair. Using standard boundary conditions and suitable ansatz, we solve numerically for black hole solutions in the effective theory (4). Similar setups have been explored in the literatu...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Adopting the gauge-fixed ansatz: ds2 = ℓ2 4ρ2dρ2 + 1 ρgij(ρ,x )dxidxj (10) where ρ is the holographic radial coordinate (ρ→∞ at the boundary), ℓ is the AdS radius

    HOLOGRAPHIC CONFORMAL ANOMALY To compute the Weyl anomaly holographically, we employ the Fefferman-Graham (FG) expan- sion [3, 4] of the bulk metric in asymptotically locallyAdSd+1 spacetime. Adopting the gauge-fixed ansatz: ds2 = ℓ2 4ρ2dρ2 + 1 ρgij(ρ,x )dxidxj (10) where ρ is the holographic radial coordinate (ρ→∞ at the boundary), ℓ is the AdS radius. T...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Consider the ansatz [25] ds2 5 =dr2 +eA(r) −dt2 +dx2 1 +dx2 2 +dx2 3 with ϕ =ϕ(r) The AdS vacuum is given by A(r) = r/ℓ, with ℓ being the AdS radius

    HOLOGRAPHIC A-THEOREM We construct a-functions, which decrease monotonically from UV to IR limit. Consider the ansatz [25] ds2 5 =dr2 +eA(r) −dt2 +dx2 1 +dx2 2 +dx2 3 with ϕ =ϕ(r) The AdS vacuum is given by A(r) = r/ℓ, with ℓ being the AdS radius. The function A(r) describes the flow to the AdS “fixed” point. For asymptotically AdS domain walls, we adopt ...

    work page

  8. [8]

    AdS/log-CFT

    (16) For a unitary Lorentzian CFT such negative values violate the conformal-collider (positive-energy-flux) requirements. Hence this particular bulk solution cannot serve as the dual of a unitary four-dimensional quantum field theory [39]. However, Negative central charges are perfectly acceptable in non-unitary CFT, open quantum system for example, or l...

    work page

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    For theory 6 with linear dilaton solution, choosing suitable parameters, We found the condition A′(r)2 +ϕ′(r)2 = 1 ℓ2

    And we conclude that a′(r) = 15A′′(r) 8A′(r)4 ≥ 0, thus establishing the a-theorem. For theory 6 with linear dilaton solution, choosing suitable parameters, We found the condition A′(r)2 +ϕ′(r)2 = 1 ℓ2 . The Null Energy Condition gives 32A′(r)2− 24 ℓ2− 8ℓ2A′(r)4 + 1 + (−6ℓ2 + ...

  2. [10]

    This two-vacuum mechanism provides the first top- down arena in which distinct UV branches both exhibit the AdS 5 geometry

    CONCLUSION we have shown that a single α′-corrected heterotic action, when viewed through two admissible 10-dimensional vacua, furnishes a unified route to two inequivalent 5-dimensional scalar–tensor theories—EdGB and Lovelock–Horndeski. This two-vacuum mechanism provides the...

  3. [11]

    Witten, Anti de sitter space and holography, Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 2, 253 (1998)

    E. Witten, Anti de sitter space and holography, Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 2, 253 (1998)

    1998

  4. [12]

    Maldacena, The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 38, 1113–1133 (1999)

    J. Maldacena, The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 38, 1113–1133 (1999)

    1999

  5. [13]

    Henningson and K

    M. Henningson and K. Skenderis, The holographic weyl anomaly, Journal of High Energy Physics 1998, 023 (1998)

    1998

  6. [14]

    Fefferman and C

    C. Fefferman and C. R. Graham, Conformal invariants, ´Elie Cartan et les math´ ematiques d’aujourd’hui - Lyon, 25-29 juin 1984 , Ast´ erisque No. S131 (1985) pp. 95–116

    1985

  7. [15]

    M. J. Duff, Twenty years of the weyl anomaly, Classical and Quantum Gravity 11, 1387 (1994)

    1994

  8. [16]

    Deser, and A

    S. Deser, and A. Schwimmer, Geometric classification of conformal anomalies in arbitrary dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 309, 279–284 (1993)

    1993

  9. [17]

    Balasubramanian, and P

    V. Balasubramanian, and P. Kraus, A Stress Tensor for Anti-de Sitter Gravity, Comm. Math. Phys. 208, 413–428 (1999)

    1999

  10. [18]

    Nojiri and S

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, On the conformal anomaly from higher derivative gravity in ads/cft 10 correspondence, International Journal of Modern Physics A 15, 413 (2000)

    2000

  11. [19]

    de Boer, and M

    J. de Boer, and M. Kulaxizi, M. and A. Parnachev, Holographic entanglement entropy in Lovelock gravities, J. High Energ. Phys. 2011, 109 (2011)

    2011

  12. [20]

    L. Y. Hung, and R. C. Myers, and M. Smolkin, On holographic entanglement entropy and higher curvature gravity,JHEP 2011, 25 (2011)

    2011

  13. [21]

    de Haro, K

    S. de Haro, K. Skenderis, and S. N. Solodukhin, Holographic reconstruction of spacetime and renormal- ization in the ads/cft correspondence, Communications in Mathematical Physics 217, 595–622 (2001)

    2001

  14. [22]

    Lovelock, The einstein tensor and its generalizations, Journal of Mathematical Physics 12, 498 (1971)

    D. Lovelock, The einstein tensor and its generalizations, Journal of Mathematical Physics 12, 498 (1971)

    1971

  15. [23]

    G. W. Horndeski, Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space, Int J Theor Phys 10, 363–384 (1974)

    1974

  16. [24]

    Copeland, Antonio Padilla, and Paul M

    Christos Charmousis, Edmund J. Copeland, Antonio Padilla, and Paul M. Saffin, General Second-Order Scalar-Tensor Theory and Self-Tuning, Physical Review Letters, 108(5), 051101, arXiv:1106.2000

    2000 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Kobayashi, and M

    T. Kobayashi, and M. Yamaguchi, and J. Yokoyama, Generalized G-inflation: Inflation with the most general second-order field equations, Prog. Theor. Phys. 126, 511–529 (2011)

    2011

  18. [26]

    Nicolis, R

    A. Nicolis, R. Rattazzi, E. Trincherini, Galileon as a local modification of gravity, Phys. Rev. D 79. 064036 (2009), arXiv:0811.2197

    2009 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Curvature Squared Terms and String Theories

    Zwiebach, B. (1985). “Curvature Squared Terms and String Theories.” Physics Letters B, 156(5–6), 315–317

    1985

  20. [28]

    D. G. Boulware and S. Deser, String-generated gravity models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2656 (1985)

    1985

  21. [29]

    Charmousis, B

    C. Charmousis, B. Gout´ eraux, and E. Kiritsis, Higher-derivative scalar-vector-tensor theories: black holes, galileons, singularity cloaking and holography, Journal of High Energy Physics 2012, 11 (2012)

    2012

  22. [30]

    Metsaev and A

    R. Metsaev and A. Tseytlin, Order α’ (two-loop) equivalence of the string equations of motion and the σ-model weyl invariance conditions: Dependence on the dilaton and the antisymmetric tensor, Nuclear Physics B 293, 385 (1987)

    1987

  23. [31]

    Z.-K. Guo, N. Ohta, and T. Torii, Black Holes in the Dilatonic Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Theory in Various Dimensions. II: Asymptotically AdS Topological Black Holes, Progress of Theoretical Physics 121, 253 (2009)

    2009

  24. [32]

    Ohta and T

    N. Ohta and T. Torii, Black Holes in the Dilatonic Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Theory in Various Dimen- sions. III: Asymptotically AdS Black Holes with k = ± 1, Progress of Theoretical Physics 121, 959 19 (2009)

    2009

  25. [33]

    Thomas Hertog and Kengo Maeda, Black holes with scalar hair and asymptotics inN = 8 supergravity, JHEP07(2004)051, (2004)

    2004

  26. [34]

    Henneaux, C

    M. Henneaux, C. Mart´ ınez, R. Troncoso, and J. Zanelli, Asymptotically anti–de Sitter spacetimes and scalar fields with a logarithmic branch, Phys. Rev. D. 70, 044034, (2004)

    2004

  27. [35]

    R. C. Myers and A. Sinha, Seeing a a-theorem with holography, Phys. Rev. D 82, 046006 (2010)

    2010

  28. [36]

    Pope, Kaluza-Klein Supergravity, Physics Reports 130 1–142 (1986) 11

    C. Pope, Kaluza-Klein Supergravity, Physics Reports 130 1–142 (1986) 11

    1986

  29. [37]

    Wu, Ads wormholes from ricci-flat/ads correspondence, Phys

    T. Wu, Ads wormholes from ricci-flat/ads correspondence, Phys. Rev. D 108, 044001 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    L¨ u and Y

    H. L¨ u and Y. Pang, Horndeski gravity as d → 4 limit of gauss-bonnet, Physics Letters B 809, 135717 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    Osorio, Cosmological constant versus free energy for heterotic strings, Nucl.Phys.B 304 (1988) 327-347

    Enrique Alvarez and M.A.R. Osorio, Cosmological constant versus free energy for heterotic strings, Nucl.Phys.B 304 (1988) 327-347

    1988

  32. [40]

    De Alwis and J

    S.P. De Alwis and J. Polchinski and R. Schimmrigk, Heterotic strings with tree level cosmological constant, Phys.Lett.B 218 (1989) 449-454

    1989

  33. [41]

    Alvarez-Gaume and P

    L. Alvarez-Gaume and P. Ginsparg and G. Moore and C. Vafa, An O(16) × O(16) heterotic string, Phys.Lett.B 171 (1986) 155-162

    1986

  34. [42]

    Florakis and J

    I. Florakis and J. Rizos, Chiral heterotic strings with positive cosmological constant, Nuclear Physics B, 913, 495-533 (2016)

    2016

  35. [43]

    Anabalon, A

    A. Anabalon, A. Cisterna, J. Oliva, Asymptotically locally AdS and flat black holes in Horndeski theory, Phys. Rev. D 89, 084050 (2014)

    2014

  36. [44]

    Baake, and A

    O. Baake, and A. Cisterna, and M. Hassaine, and U. Hernandez-Vera, Endowing black holes with beyond-Horndeski primary hair: An exact solution framework for scalarizing in every dimension, Phys. Rev. D 109, 064024 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Cisterna, S

    A. Cisterna, S. Fuenzalida, M. Lagos, J. Oliva, Homogeneous Black Strings in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet with Horndeski hair and beyond, The European Physical Journal C, 78, 982 (2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    Babichev, C

    E. Babichev, C. Charmousis, Dressing a black hole with a time-dependent Galileon, Journal of High Energy Physics 1408 (2014) 106

    2014

  39. [47]

    Kanitscheider, K

    I. Kanitscheider, K. Skenderis, M. Taylor, Precision holography for non-conformal branes, Hournal of High Energy Physics 09 (2008) 094

    2008

  40. [48]

    Li and H

    Y.-Z. Li and H. L¨ u, a-theorem for Horndeski gravity at the critical point, Phys. Rev. D 97, 126008 (2018)

    2018

  41. [49]

    Hofman, and D

    Diego M. Hofman, and D. Li, and D. Meltzer, and D. Poland, and F. Rejon-Barrera, A proof of the conformal collider bounds, J. High Energ. Phys. 2016, 111 (2016)

    2016

  42. [50]

    Grumiller, and W

    D. Grumiller, and W. Riedler, and J. Rosseel, and T. Zojer, Holographic applications of logarithmic conformal field theories, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 46 494002 (2013)

    2013

  43. [51]

    Ryu, and J

    S. Ryu, and J. Yoon, Unitarity of Symplectic Fermions in α Vacua with Negative Central Charge, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 241602 (2023)

    2023

  44. [52]

    Polchinski, Scale and conformal invariance in quantum field theory, Nuclear Physics B, Volume 303, Issue 2, 1988

    J. Polchinski, Scale and conformal invariance in quantum field theory, Nuclear Physics B, Volume 303, Issue 2, 1988

    1988

  45. [53]

    Nakayama, Scale invariance vs conformal invariance, arXiv:1302.0884

    Y. Nakayama, Scale invariance vs conformal invariance, arXiv:1302.0884

    arXiv

  46. [54]

    Kent Yagi, and Leo C Stein, Black hole based tests of general relativity, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 33(5):054001, (2016)

    2016

  47. [55]

    Doneva, and Stoytcho S

    Daniela D. Doneva, and Stoytcho S. Yazadjiev, New Gauss-Bonnet Black Holes with Curvature-Induced Scalarization in Extended Scalar-Tensor Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett., 120:131103, (2018) 12 Appendix A: Covariant Equations of Motion This section presents the Covariant Equations o...

    2018

  48. [56]

    When solving for the AdS solutions, we have obtained c1 = 24, as well as α2 =− 4ℓ2 + 2 3α3 , in this case though, α3 and α4 are left free

    Coefficients in Lovelock-Horndeski theory We first look at the one without linear dilaton, its anomalous action is given by ℓ−1A = α1 R2 (0)− 4R(0)abRab (0) +R(0)abcdRabcd (0) + 2α1 ℓ2 Rab (0)− 1 2R(0)gab (0) g(1)ab (C1) + A1g a (2)a +A2g(1)abg ab (1) +A3 g a (1)a 2 +A4 ϕ(1) 2...

  49. [57]

    Coefficients for EdGB theory For theory (5) in four dimensions, the anomalous action takes the form: ℓ−1A = αR2 (0)− 4αR(0)abRab (0) +αR(0)abcdRabcd (0) e−γϕ(0)− 108αγ ℓ4 e−γϕ(0) +λΛeλϕ(0) ϕ(2) + 4α ℓ2 Rab (0)g(1)ab− 1 2R(0)gab (0)g(1)ab e−γϕ(0) + 12αγϕ(1)R(0) ℓ2 e−γϕ(0) + 4 ℓ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.