Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 33 references

Dynamical dark energy and gravitational coupling from moving geometries

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The equations of motion of a moving-Cartan-geometry gauge action fix a scalar field that makes dark energy proportional to the Ricci scalar and Newton's constant inversely proportional to it, with their product constant; in the simplest…

desk verdict A genuinely new construction—spacetime-dependent structure constants in a Cartan-geometric action—that yields dynamical Λ and G from the variational principle; the EOMs stand on the explicit action, but the Chern-Weil/topological interpretation is not established for non-constant k,k′,ℓ. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.01312 v3 pith:UH7TRMYK submitted 2025-05-02 gr-qc math-phmath.MP

Jean Thibaut This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcmath-phmath.MP
keywords TopologicalgravityCartangeometryMovinggeometriesDynamicaldarkenergyVaryinggravitationalcouplingCharacteristicclassesNieh-YantermMutation
topics Dark Energy
open problems Dark Energy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that promoting the structure constants of a Cartan geometry from numbers to spacetime-dependent scalar fields, a 'moving geometry,' turns two constants of gravity into dynamical fields fixed by the action itself. The author works with a deformed topological gauge action built from characteristic classes, including a generalized Nieh-Yan term, and derives equations of motion for the connection, the tetrad, and the new scalars $k$, $k'$, $\ell$. On shell, these scalars combine into $\chi = -12kk'/\ell^2$, which the field equations identify with curvature, torsion, and matter scalars. In the simplest branch the result is a dark-energy source $\Lambda_G = R/4$ and a gravitational coupling $G = 6\pi/(eR)$, so $\Lambda_G G$ is constant and Newton's constant runs inversely with the Ricci scalar. A reader would care because this offers a single geometric origin for both a dynamical cosmological term and a running gravitational coupling, with no extra scalar fields added by hand.

What carries the argument

The central object is a moving Cartan geometry: a quotient $G/H$ whose symmetric Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g} = \mathfrak{h} \oplus \mathfrak{m}$ is mutated by spacetime-dependent scale factors $k$, $k'$, $\ell$, so the bracket $[M_a, M_b] = (kk'/\ell^2) J_{ab}$ varies point to point. The workhorse is the deformed topological action, a linear combination of Pontryagin, Pfaffian, and determinant invariant polynomials evaluated on the Cartan curvature $\bar{\Omega} = d\varpi + \frac{1}{2}[\varpi,\varpi]$; for the moving geometry the curvature acquires explicit terms $dk/\ell \, \beta + dk'/\ell \, \bar{\beta}$. The author forms the gauge action, adds a Dirac-like matter action, and varies with respect to $\beta$, $A$, $\ell$, $k$, $k'$. The equations of motion collapse into relations for $\chi = -12kk'/\ell^2$, which on shell equals $R + (y/e) R^{ab}_{\mu\nu}\varepsilon^{\mu\nu}_{ab}$ (or a matter-modified variant $\chi'$), and this same $\chi$ fixes $G = 6\pi/(e\chi)$ and $\Lambda_G = \chi/4$. The Bianchi identities and a generalized Nieh-Yan combination make the kinetic terms for the new scalars drop out of the equations of motion, which is why the constants can run without new kinetic baggage.

What would settle it

Take a moving Lorentzian connection with $k$, $k'$, $\ell$ non-constant and $k'\,dk \neq k\,dk'$, and directly compute the exterior derivative of the 4-form $\mathrm{Tr}(\bar{\Omega}\wedge\bar{\Omega})$ that defines the Pontryagin-type term; a nonzero result means the characteristic-form step fails, and the on-shell identification $\chi = R + (y/e) R^{ab}_{\mu\nu}\varepsilon^{\mu\nu}_{ab}$ is not secured by the Bianchi-then-characteristic-class route, which is where the central claim would stand or fall.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that promoting the structure constants of a Cartan geometry to spacetime-dependent scalar fields—a moving geometry—makes the equations of motion of the gauge-plus-matter action fix the geometry point by point, producing a dynamical dark-energy source and a dynamical gravitational coupling from a single scalar. For the moving Lorentzian geometry with the conservative Dirac-type matter action $S_M$, the on-shell relations are $\Lambda_G = \chi/4$ and $G = 6\pi/(e\chi)$, where $\chi = -12kk'/\ell^2$ and on shell $\chi = R + (y/e) R^{ab}_{\mu\nu}\varepsilon^{\mu\nu}_{ab}$; in the simplified $y=0$ case this is $\Lambda_G = R/4$ and $G = 6\pi/(eR)$. The same $\chi$ enters a modified torsion equation, and the constants $e$, $r$, $y$ are fixed by the bare cosmological constant $\Lambda_0$, Newton's constant $G_0$ at a reference point, and the parameter $\gamma$. With the alternative matter action $S'_M$, which keeps the mutation degrees of freedom, both $\Lambda_G$ and $G$ instead become proportional to a matter-modified scalar $\chi'$. The paper also claims the action becomes asymptotically topological as $\Lambda_G \to 0$, and extends the construction to Lorentz$\times$Weyl (conformal) moving geometries with an additional dilation field, obtaining analogous dynamical couplings.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the action's characteristic-class integrals over the moving curvature remain valid even though the curvature is allowed to leave the Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$, because the paper explicitly chooses not to impose the condition $k'\,dk = k\,dk'$ that would keep the curvature inside $\mathfrak{g}$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the $r = y = 0$ branch with the conservative Dirac-like matter action, the on-shell relations are $\Lambda_G = R/4$ and $G = 6\pi/(eR)$, so the product $\Lambda_G G$ is constant and $G$ grows as $R$ decreases.
  • In the general Lorentzian case, the same on-shell scalar $\chi = -12kk'/\ell^2$ drives $\Lambda_G$, $G$, and the torsion equation, so a single geometric field controls all three.
  • With the alternative matter action $S'_M$, both $\Lambda_G$ and $G$ become proportional to $\chi'$, which itself depends on the matter fields, so the running gravitational coupling includes matter contributions.
  • $\Lambda_G \to 0$ marks the asymptotically topological limit of the action, connecting the small observed value of dark energy to the approach to a topological phase rather than to a fixed constant.
  • The dark-energy source of the simplest branch matches a Ricci dark energy model with parameter $\alpha = 1/2$, but with a time-varying Newton constant instead of a fixed one.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the on-shell identification survives a consistent treatment of the non-Lie-algebra-valued curvature, the constant product $\Lambda_G G = 3\pi/(2e)$ becomes a dimensionless invariant that cosmological data could in principle test: measurements of late-time dark energy and of a running Newton constant should track each other.
  • The same mutation mechanism could be transplanted to other symmetric or reductive geometries, such as Euclidean signatures, internal gauge groups, or higher dimensions, where spacetime-dependent structure fields would generate analogous running couplings for non-gravitational sectors.
  • The non-closedness of the characteristic forms for $k'\,dk \neq k\,dk'$ could be reinterpreted as a kind of anomaly or as the seed of quantum corrections; nothing in the paper develops this, but it is the natural next question.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces 'moving Cartan geometries', in which the mutation parameters k, k' and ℓ in the Lie-algebra presentation (2.1.2) are promoted to spacetime-dependent scalar fields, so that the structure 'constants' of the model geometry vary pointwise. It writes deformed topological gauge actions (1.1)/(2.3.1) for Lorentzian and Lorentz×Weyl geometries, computes the equations of motion, and solves them on shell to obtain χ = −12kk'/ℓ² = R + (y/e)R^ab_{μν}ε^{μν}_{ab}, Λ_G = χ/4 and G = 6π/(eχ). Depending on the Dirac-type matter action chosen (S_M or S'_M), the gravitational coupling is inversely or directly proportional to the dark-energy scalar, and in the r = y = 0, ρ_vac = 0 limit the model reduces to a Ricci-type dark energy model Λ_G = R/4 with G = G_0 R_0/R. The paper also constructs the analogous conformal Lorentz×Weyl case and derives the corresponding field equations.

Significance. If the central derivation were complete, this would be an attractive mechanism: dark energy and the gravitational coupling would be different manifestations of the same on-shell scalar combination χ, giving the concrete relation Λ_G G = 3π/(2e) and a falsifiable RDE-like limit with α = 1/2. The paper is transparent about its axioms and prints a substantial amount of the algebra, which is a real strength. However, the central variational problem is currently not well defined for the non-g-valued curvature that the paper explicitly allows, so the significance is conditional on a missing mathematical step.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 2.2 and Sec. 2.3] The curvature in (2.2.2) contains the terms (dk/ℓ)β and (dk'/ℓ)β̄, and the paper explicitly declines to impose condition (2.2.5), which it states is the necessary and sufficient condition for the curvature to be g-valued. The trace Tr used in the action (2.3.1) is introduced as a map g×g→R, and the invariant polynomials in (1.1) are defined on g-valued curvature. Applying them to Ω̄∧Ω̄ therefore requires an extension of the trace and of the invariant polynomials to the ambient matrix algebra, but no such extension is specified, and its Ad(H)-invariance and independence of the choice of local trivialization are not checked. As a result, the action (2.3.1) is not yet a well-defined functional of the moving connection, and the equations of motion (2.3.10)–(2.3.14), and hence the central constraint (2.3.20), are not uniquely determined by the stated first principles. Either impose (2.2.5) or supply and verify a canonical invariant extension; this is load-bearing for the paper's central claim.
  2. [Sec. 2.2, Bianchi identities and Chern–Weil closure] The paper states that the Bianchi identities DΩ̄ = 0 are satisfied even when (2.2.5) is not imposed, and that the topological properties of the action are preserved if the Bianchi identities hold. This is not sufficient: Chern–Weil closure of characteristic forms requires the curvature to be g-valued, not merely to satisfy a Bianchi identity. For non-g-valued curvature, the invariant polynomial expression need not be closed, so the 'topological' character of the action and the identification of (1.1) as a deformation of a topological gauge theory are asserted rather than demonstrated. Since the dark-energy identification Λ_G = χ/4 is presented as a consequence of this action structure, the missing closure argument is a load-bearing gap.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. 1] The abstract's phrase that the scalar fields are 'entirely determined at each point' overstates the situation, because the coefficients e, r, y are fixed at the reference point x0 through (2.3.24)–(2.3.26); the paper should state this normalization explicitly in the introduction.
  2. [Eq. (2.3.1)] Equation (2.3.1) contains an inline overbrace labelled '=0' under β^a∧β^a inside the integrand; as printed this appears to be a typographical artifact and should be removed or explained.
  3. [Eq. (2.3.2)] The labelled braces in (2.3.2) are helpful, but the 'Kinetic term for k, k', and ℓ' label covers only part of the displayed expression; the remaining terms in the same line are part of the same contribution and should be grouped unambiguously.
  4. [Sec. 2.3.1, after Eq. (2.3.35)] The sentence 'with e = 6π/(G_0 R_0)' uses R_0, but the preceding equations use R(x0) and R_0; the notation should be harmonized to avoid confusion with the scalar R̃ introduced in the same paragraph.
  5. [Sec. 3.4] The definitions of the matter actions S_M, S'_M, S̃_M and S̃'_M in (3.4.5)–(3.4.9) would benefit from a summary table of the four cases, since the subsequent EOMs (3.4.11)–(3.4.25) branch on these choices and the notation becomes hard to follow.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the dynamical dark-energy and gravitational-coupling relations follow from the equations of motion of the displayed action; the only self-citation is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is essentially self-contained. Equations (2.3.10)-(2.3.14) are direct variational derivatives of the explicitly displayed action (2.3.1)-(2.3.2), and the central constraint (2.3.20), chi = -12kk'/ell^2 = R + (y/e) R^ab_{mu nu} epsilon^{mu nu}_{ab}, is obtained algebraically from the ell,k,k' equations rather than being assumed. The effective quantities Lambda_G and G are then read off from the Einstein-like equation (2.3.17); this is a coefficient identification, and the resulting relations Lambda_G = chi/4 and G = 6 pi/(e chi) are consequences of the field equations, not fitted inputs. The reference-point normalizations (2.3.24)-(2.3.26) fix the constants e,r,y to reproduce local values Lambda_0, G_0, gamma; this is a boundary-condition normalization, not a fit of the predicted running behavior. The same holds for the normalization of kappa,zeta in the matter actions (2.3.7)-(2.3.8), which sets the unit normalization to the standard Dirac action at a point without encoding the chi-dependence that is later derived. The self-citation to [12] supplies the starting action and topological interpretation, but since the action is written out in full and varied directly, the central dark-energy/G claim does not reduce to that citation. The manuscript's own admission that dk/ell beta and dk'/ell bar-beta need not lie in the Lie algebra (2.2.2)-(2.2.5) and its conditional Chern-Weil remark are a genuine mathematical gap in the topological interpretation, but they are not circularity: the EOMs are computed from an explicit trace extension of the action. I find no step where a 'prediction' is identical to a fitted input or to the defining data by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central model is not self-contained: the action (1.1) is taken from the authors' earlier paper [12]; the coefficients e, r, y are calibrated to reproduce G0, Λ0 and the Immirzi parameter at a reference point; and the choice between matter actions SM and S'M is an input that changes the sign of the G-versus-χ relation. The paper's genuinely new content is the moving structure fields k,k',ℓ and the on-shell identity linking the cosmological and Newton fields. The additional coupling v is introduced by hand in the conformal section.

free parameters (3)
  • e, r, y (coefficients of the topological action) = e=3π/(2Λ0G0), r and y fixed by γ and R^ab_{μν} at x0 (Eqs. (2.3.27)-(2.3.29))
    These constants multiply the topological terms in (1.1). They are calibrated so the theory reproduces Newton's constant G0 and the bare cosmological constant Λ0 at a reference point x0, plus the Barbero-Immirzi parameter γ; they are not derived from the action alone.
  • v (torsion-dilation coupling)
    Introduced by hand in Section 3.4.1 as an interaction between torsion and dilations, with no independent determination; it affects the conformal EOMs (3.4.11)-(3.4.14).
  • reference values k0, k0', ℓ0 = set by G0 and Λ0 at x0
    The normalization of the matter action S'_M is set so that it equals the standard Dirac action at x0 (Eqs. (2.3.7)-(2.3.8), (3.4.8)); these values absorb the local calibration.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Standard differential-geometric identities: Bianchi identities and Chern-Weil theorem apply to the moving connection.
    Invoked to justify the topological character of action (1.1) and the Λ_G→0 limit (Section 2.2 after Eq. (2.2.5), Section 2.3 after Eq. (2.3.31)).
  • standard math Frobenius theorem characterizes the integrable submanifold M defined by α=k/2 β.
    Used in Proposition 3.1 to reduce the 8-dimensional conformal geometry to a 4-dimensional spacetime.
  • ad hoc to paper The moving curvature may leave the Lie algebra g; condition (2.2.5) is not imposed.
    Eq. (2.2.2) contains dk/ℓ β and dk'/ℓ ̄β; the text explicitly chooses not to impose k'dk=kdk', yet continues to use g-valued traces and Bianchi/Chern-Weil reasoning.
  • ad hoc to paper The topological property of the action requires Λ_G→0, as in [12].
    Stated after Eq. (2.3.31) without proof for the non-constant case; used to claim the small observed cosmological constant is coherent.
  • domain assumption Matter is described by Dirac-like actions SM or S'_M with normalization chosen at a reference point.
    The behavior of Λ_G and G depends on which matter action is selected (tables (2.3.44) and (3.4.28)); this is an input choice, not derived.
invented entities (1)
  • Moving Cartan geometry with spacetime-dependent structure fields k,k',ℓ
    purpose: To encode point-dependent Lie algebra brackets, making the bare cosmological constant and gravitational coupling dynamical.
    It is a new mathematical object introduced in this paper. It has no falsifiable handle outside the model; its consistency is the open issue raised by the non-g-valued curvature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dynamical dark energy and gravitational coupling from moving geometries." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UH7TRMYK

@misc{pith2026250501312,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dynamical dark energy and gravitational coupling from moving geometries},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UH7TRMYK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.01312}
}
abstract

We introduce the notion of moving Cartan geometries described by quotients of Lie groups and Lie algebras with spacetime dependant structure constants and construct associated deformed topological gauge action functionals for Lorentzian (including dS and AdS) and Lorentz$\times$Weyl moving geometries. The actions feature a generalization of the Nieh-Yan topological term for a varying coupling constant. We compute the equations of motion of the gauge $+$ matter actions and show that they dictate at each spacetime point the geometry, leading to both a dynamical source of dark energy and a dynamical gravitational coupling, described by combinations of scalars built from spacetime curvature, torsion and the matter content of the theory. The action becomes asymptotically topological when the gauge action contribution to dark energy vanishes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

  1. [12]

    Gravity as a deformed topological gauge theory

    Jean Thibaut and Serge Lazzarini. Gravity as a deformed topological gauge theory. March

    work page

  2. [1]

    Chern-Simons Modified General Relativity.Physics Reports, 480(1-2):1–55, August 2009

    Stephon Alexander and Nicolas Yunes. Chern-Simons Modified General Relativity.Physics Reports, 480(1-2):1–55, August 2009. arXiv:0907.2562 [astro-ph, physics:gr-qc, physics:hep- th]. 20

    arXiv 2009

  3. [2]

    The Barbero-Immirzi Parameter as a Scalar Field: K- Inflation from Loop Quantum Gravity?Physical Review D, 78(6):064070, September 2008

    Victor Taveras and Nicolas Yunes. The Barbero-Immirzi Parameter as a Scalar Field: K- Inflation from Loop Quantum Gravity?Physical Review D, 78(6):064070, September 2008. arXiv:0807.2652 [astro-ph, physics:gr-qc, physics:hep-th]

    arXiv 2008

  4. [3]

    Scale-dependent Newton’s constant G in the confor- mal Newtonian gauge.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 84(10):103507, 2011

    Herbert W Hamber and Reiko Toriumi. Scale-dependent Newton’s constant G in the confor- mal Newtonian gauge.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 84(10):103507, 2011

    work page 2011

  5. [4]

    The Quantum Cosmological Constant

    Stephon Alexander, Joao Magueijo, and Lee Smolin. The Quantum Cosmological Constant. Symmetry, 11(9):1130, September 2019. Number: 9 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute

    work page 2019

  6. [5]

    Liddle, João Magueijo, Robert Sims, and Lee Smolin

    Stephon Alexander, Marina Cortês, Andrew R. Liddle, João Magueijo, Robert Sims, and Lee Smolin. Zero-parameter extension of general relativity with a varying cosmological constant. Physical Review D, 100(8):083506, October 2019. Publisher: American Physical Society

    work page 2019

  7. [6]

    Copeland, M

    Edmund J. Copeland, M. Sami, and Shinji Tsujikawa. Dynamics of dark energy. In- ternational Journal of Modern Physics D, 15(11):1753–1935, November 2006. arXiv:hep- th/0603057

    arXiv 1935

  8. [7]

    Dark energy: A brief review.Frontiers of Physics, 8:828–846, 2013

    Miao Li, Xiao-Dong Li, Shuang Wang, and Yi Wang. Dark energy: A brief review.Frontiers of Physics, 8:828–846, 2013

    work page 2013

Show all 33 references
  1. [8]

    Cosmological consequences of varying couplings in gravity action.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.18585, 2025

    Sandipan Sengupta. Cosmological consequences of varying couplings in gravity action.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.18585, 2025

    2025

  2. [9]

    Varying constants, gravitation and cosmology.Living reviews in rela- tivity, 14(1):1–155, 2011

    Jean-Philippe Uzan. Varying constants, gravitation and cosmology.Living reviews in rela- tivity, 14(1):1–155, 2011

    2011

  3. [10]

    Uniting the Observed Dynamical Dark Energy Preference with the Discrepancies in Ωm and H0 Across Cosmological Probes, March 2025

    Xianzhe TZ Tang, Dillon Brout, Tanvi Karwal, Chihway Chang, Vivian Miranda, and Maria Vincenzi. Uniting the Observed Dynamical Dark Energy Preference with the Discrepancies in Ωm and H0 Across Cosmological Probes, March 2025. arXiv:2412.04430 [astro-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  4. [11]

    DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints, March 2025

    DESI Collaboration. DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints, March 2025. arXiv:2503.14738 [astro-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  5. [13]

    A Holographic Dark Energy Model from Ricci Scalar Curvature

    Changjun Gao, Fengquan Wu, Xuelei Chen, and You-Gen Shen. A Holographic Dark Energy Model from Ricci Scalar Curvature. Physical Review D, 79(4):043511, February

  6. [14]

    Sharpe.Differential Geometry: Cartan’s Generalization of Klein’s Erlangen Program

    R.W. Sharpe.Differential Geometry: Cartan’s Generalization of Klein’s Erlangen Program. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer New York, 1997

    1997

  7. [15]

    Gravity from (A) dS Yang-Mills: a natural reduction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.17574, 2025

    Goffredo Chirco, Alfonso Lamberti, Lucio Vacchiano, and Patrizia Vitale. Gravity from (A) dS Yang-Mills: a natural reduction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.17574, 2025

    2025

  8. [16]

    Derek K. Wise. MacDowell-Mansouri gravity and Cartan geometry.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 27(15):155010, August 2010. arXiv:gr-qc/0611154

    2010 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Göckeler and T

    M. Göckeler and T. Schücker.Differential Geometry, Gauge Theories, and Gravity. Cam- bridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 1987

    1987

  10. [18]

    Vacuum energy and cosmological evolution

    Joan Solà. Vacuum energy and cosmological evolution. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1606(1):19–37, July 2014

    2014

  11. [19]

    Sean M. Carroll. The Cosmological Constant.Living Reviews in Relativity, 4(1):1, 2001

    2001

  12. [20]

    Dust collapse in asymptotic safety: A path to regular black holes.Physical Review Letters, 132(3):031401, 2024

    Alfio Bonanno, Daniele Malafarina, and Antonio Panassiti. Dust collapse in asymptotic safety: A path to regular black holes.Physical Review Letters, 132(3):031401, 2024. 21

    2024

  13. [21]

    Black holes in asymptotically safe gravity and beyond

    Astrid Eichhorn and Aaron Held. Black holes in asymptotically safe gravity and beyond. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.09495, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  14. [22]

    The nonperturbative functional renormalization group and its applications.Physics Reports, 910:1–114, 2021

    Nicolas Dupuis, Léonie Canet, Astrid Eichhorn, Walter Metzner, Jan M Pawlowski, Matthieu Tissier, and Nicolás Wschebor. The nonperturbative functional renormalization group and its applications.Physics Reports, 910:1–114, 2021

    2021

  15. [23]

    Modified newtonian dynamics (mond): observational phenomenology and relativistic extensions.Living reviews in relativity, 15:1–159, 2012

    Benoit Famaey and Stacy S McGaugh. Modified newtonian dynamics (mond): observational phenomenology and relativistic extensions.Living reviews in relativity, 15:1–159, 2012

    2012

  16. [24]

    Scalar–tensor–vectorgravitytheory

    JohnWMoffat. Scalar–tensor–vectorgravitytheory. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2006(03):004, 2006

    2006

  17. [25]

    Distinguishing dark matter, modified gravity, and modified inertia with the inner and outer parts of galactic rotation curves.The Astrophysical Journal, 941(1):55, 2022

    Kyu-Hyun Chae. Distinguishing dark matter, modified gravity, and modified inertia with the inner and outer parts of galactic rotation curves.The Astrophysical Journal, 941(1):55, 2022

    2022

  18. [26]

    Galactic rotation dynamics in a new f (R) gravity model.The European Physical Journal C, 83(5):411, 2023

    Nashiba Parbin and Umananda Dev Goswami. Galactic rotation dynamics in a new f (R) gravity model.The European Physical Journal C, 83(5):411, 2023

    2023

  19. [27]

    Galaxy rotation curves in the f (R, T) gravity formalism

    Hamid Shabani and PHRS Moraes. Galaxy rotation curves in the f (R, T) gravity formalism. Physica Scripta, 98(6):065302, 2023

    2023

  20. [28]

    Galactic rotation curves of spiral galaxies and dark matter in f (R, T) gravity theory.International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, 21(04):2450082, 2024

    Gayatri Mohan and Umananda Dev Goswami. Galactic rotation curves of spiral galaxies and dark matter in f (R, T) gravity theory.International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, 21(04):2450082, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Springer Science & Business Media, February 1995

    Shoshichi Kobayashi.Transformation Groups in Differential Geometry. Springer Science & Business Media, February 1995

    1995

  22. [30]

    Shoshichi Kobayashi and Katsumi Nomizu.Foundations of Differential Geometry, Volume

  23. [33]

    Wiley, February 1996. 22

    1996

  24. [2009]

    arXiv:0712.1394 [astro-ph, physics:gr-qc, physics:hep-th]

    arXiv

  25. [2024]

    arXiv:2403.05284 [gr-qc]

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.