Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Federated Learning for Cyber Physical Systems: A Comprehensive Survey

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A survey organizes federated learning for cyber-physical systems into a taxonomy and a five-layer integration framework.

desk verdict Useful mapping of FL-CPS with a helpful taxonomy, but the 'systematic' claim is not supported and several table numbers don't check out; deserves peer review only with major revisions. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.04873 v1 pith:E2BTZDMT submitted 2025-05-08 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CRcs.DC

Minh K. Quan , Pubudu N. Pathirana , Mayuri Wijayasundara , Sujeeva Setunge , Dinh C. Nguyen , Christopher G. Brinton , David J. Love , H. Vincent Poor This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CRcs.DC
keywords federatedlearningcyber-physicalsystemsmachineprivacyprotectiontaxonomysmarthealthcareintelligenttransportationcities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper assembles and organizes the scattered research on federated learning in cyber-physical systems. It argues that FL's privacy-preserving, decentralized training protocol fits the constraints of CPS—distributed sensors, real-time decision making, safety, heterogeneous devices, and data sovereignty—and that the field has matured enough to be mapped. The paper builds a taxonomy of FL-CPS designs and a five-layer integration framework, then applies them to healthcare, smart cities, vehicular systems, and cybersecurity. If the map is right, researchers and practitioners gain a shared vocabulary, a way to compare systems, and a checklist of the open problems that still block practical deployment.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the FL-CPS taxonomy and integration framework. The taxonomy sorts systems along four dimensions: architecture types (centralized, hierarchical, decentralized, and hybrid), data characteristics (non-IID distribution, volume, variety, and velocity), learning paradigms (model-centric, data-centric, and hybrid), and privacy requirements (basic encryption, differential privacy with homomorphic encryption, and secure multi-party computation with zero-knowledge proofs). The integration framework organizes the lifecycle into a data layer, a model layer, an aggregation layer, a control layer, and a verification layer, linked by a five-phase workflow spanning distributed data acquisition, model initialization, collaborative training, secure aggregation, and deployment with feedback. These structures do the argument's work: they turn a scattered literature into a coordinate system for positioning individual systems and for naming what is still missing.

What would settle it

Run a reproducible literature search for federated learning in cyber-physical systems over the same period and check whether a substantial share of the retrieved papers can be placed in the taxonomy's four architecture categories and five framework layers; if many cannot, the claim of comprehensive coverage fails. A single search for a prior peer-reviewed survey with the same FL-CPS scope would also falsify the 'first comprehensive analysis' claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that federated learning and cyber-physical systems have converged into a recognizable field that can be systematically described for the first time. It asserts that FL's distributed, privacy-preserving training model is a natural fit for CPS, where data live on heterogeneous sensors and actuators, decisions must respect real-time safety constraints, and raw data cannot be centralized. To make this case, the paper constructs a taxonomy with four classification dimensions (architecture type, data characteristics, learning paradigm, and privacy requirement) and a five-layer integration framework (data, model, aggregation, control, and verification), then applies both to four application clusters: healthcare, smart cities, vehicular systems, and core cybersecurity. The claim also includes a comparative analysis that separates CPS from IoT and a roadmap of open problems—security, resource management, standardization, heterogeneity, and communication costs—that the paper says must be solved before FL-CPS can be broadly deployed.

Load-bearing premise

The survey assumes that the papers it selected, without a documented search protocol or inclusion criteria, are representative enough to make its taxonomy and gap analysis complete.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • FL-CPS systems can now be described and compared along common axes—architecture type, data characteristics, learning paradigm, and privacy tier—so a new deployment can be positioned against existing work.
  • The five-layer integration framework gives system builders a reusable structure for moving from sensor-level data collection to verified, safety-checked model deployment.
  • The survey's gap analysis points to concrete priorities: robust aggregation against poisoning and backdoor attacks, energy-aware client selection, formal verification of safety constraints, and standards for comparing federated CPS deployments.
  • The IoT versus CPS comparison implies that FL solutions designed for the IoT cannot be assumed to work in CPS without accounting for real-time control loops and safety certification.
  • The application surveys in healthcare, smart cities, vehicular networks, and cybersecurity show that the same FL mechanisms—FedAvg, FedProx, split learning, secure aggregation—transfer across domains.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the taxonomy could be used as a benchmark grid, and one testable prediction is that hybrid architectures will dominate deployments where both real-time edge autonomy and global retraining matter.
  • Beyond the paper: the five-layer framework suggests a maturity model—a new FL-CPS system could be scored layer by layer, turning a descriptive map into an engineering checklist.
  • Beyond the paper: the three privacy tiers imply a quantitative cost curve; an experiment running the same FL-CPS task under all three tiers would reveal the accuracy and latency price of stronger privacy guarantees.
  • Beyond the paper: because the survey finds no standard specification for federated CPS, a natural test is whether two independently built FL-CPS testbeds can federate with each other today; if they cannot, standardization is the binding constraint.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a survey of federated learning (FL) for cyber-physical systems (CPS). It begins with background on FL and CPS, then proposes an FL-CPS taxonomy and integration framework, reviews applications in healthcare, smart cities, vehicular systems, and cybersecurity, and concludes with lessons learned, open challenges, and future directions. The paper's central claim (Section I.B) is that it provides the 'first comprehensive and systematic analysis' of FL-CPS integration, along with taxonomy tables that classify technical components, contributions, and limitations of prior work.

Significance. If the central claim were substantiated, this survey would be a valuable reference for the growing FL-CPS community. The paper covers a broad and relevant set of application domains, and its organization into taxonomy tables and a proposed integration framework is a reasonable structure for a survey. The authors are to be credited for assembling a large body of work and for identifying several important research gaps. However, the significance is currently limited by the lack of a transparent literature selection methodology and by the poor traceability of many quantitative claims in the taxonomy tables. Because the paper positions itself as a definitive reference, these issues affect the core value of the contribution and must be addressed before the survey can serve its intended purpose.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section I.B and Section II] The paper claims to provide the 'first comprehensive and systematic analysis' of FL integration within CPS (Section I.B, bullets 1 and 3), but no literature search protocol, inclusion/exclusion criteria, database list, or quality assessment is described in Section II or elsewhere. Without such methodology, the survey cannot distinguish a comprehensive and reproducible selection of papers from a representative but arbitrary one. This directly undermines the paper's central contribution. The authors should either add a detailed methodology subsection describing how papers were identified, screened, and quality-assessed, or temper the claim of 'comprehensive and systematic' to 'broad and representative.'
  2. [Tables VI, VII, VIII, X, XI] The taxonomy tables contain numerous quantitative entries (e.g., '95.45% accuracy' for [127], 'MAE: 12.8 kW' for [166], 'F1=0.93' for [210], 'Requires TEEs' in Table VI for [134]) that are not traceable to the cited papers. The 'Limitations' column in particular includes assertions such as 'no formal convergence guarantees for non-IID data' and 'Requires TEEs for secure aggregation' that are either absent from or not clearly supported by the cited sources. Since the paper's stated purpose is to serve as a reference for researchers and practitioners (Section I.B), the accuracy and provenance of every taxonomy entry is load-bearing. The authors should either provide a direct citation or derivation for each quantitative claim and limitation, or remove entries that cannot be verified.
  3. [Section IV.C.2.b and Fig. 1] Internal cross-referencing is broken in several places: Section IV.C.2.b contains the fragment 'predicting traffic patterns IV-C2a,' which appears to be an incomplete reference; Section IV.A.2.b refers to 'Section IV .B's focus on real-time health monitoring' when it means the remote health monitoring subsection of the same section; and Table IV's 'Taxonomy Reference' column points to 'Section III.B.3,' 'Section III.B.2,' and 'Section III.B.1,' but Section III.B in the manuscript has no such numbered subsections. Furthermore, the survey structure shown in Fig. 1 does not match the actual section numbering in the text (e.g., Fig. 1 shows Section III as 'FL-CPS Taxonomy Framework' and Section IV as 'FL-CPS Applications,' which does align, but internal references such as 'Section III.B.3' do not correspond to any visible structure). These errors make the survey difficult to use and should be systematically corrected.
  4. [Section V.C and quantitative comparisons] Section V.C explicitly states that there is 'no standard approach for comparing' FL-CPS solutions and that existing works are tested on 'distinct network setups and data, making direct comparison challenging.' Yet the taxonomy tables present cross-paper numbers as if they were directly comparable, without any qualifier about differing datasets, hardware, or evaluation protocols. This internal tension undermines the reliability of the tables as a reference tool. The authors should either add a prominent caveat that all numbers are as reported by the original papers under heterogeneous conditions, or restructure the tables so that the metrics are presented as unverified literature values rather than as a meaningful comparative benchmark.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] There are numerous typos and inconsistent spellings, including 'deice' for 'device' (Section I.A), 'UA Vs' and 'UAV' inconsistencies, 'addtion' for 'addition' (Section IV.B.2.d), 'beyong-5G' for 'beyond-5G' (Section IV.D.1), and 'RestNet50' for 'ResNet50' (Section IV.B.2.a). A careful proofreading pass is needed.
  2. [Section IV.A.2.d] Reference [157] is cited for 'fuzzified one-way hashes' but does not appear in the visible reference list, and the citation numbering appears to be out of order in several places (e.g., [157] before [158] in the text). The reference list should be checked for completeness and correct ordering.
  3. [Section II.C, Eq. (3)] The proposed hierarchical aggregation formula in Eq. (3) introduces a free parameter α (set to 0.7 in the text) without any justification or sensitivity analysis. Since this is presented as part of a general integration framework, the choice of α should be explained or explicitly marked as an example rather than a default.
  4. [Section II.C, Table IV] Table IV's 'Taxonomy Reference' column uses section numbers that do not exist in the manuscript (e.g., 'Section III.B.3'). This should be corrected to point to the actual subsections of the taxonomy framework or removed if the framework is self-contained.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the survey's synthesis is descriptive, and its contested claims of comprehensiveness are accuracy/validity concerns, not derivation-from-inputs.

full rationale

This is a literature survey, not a derivation or prediction paper. Its central claim of being the 'first comprehensive and systematic analysis' of FL-CPS (Section I.B) is a scope and coverage assertion about the existing literature, not a quantity derived from its own inputs. The taxonomy tables (VI, VII, VIII, X, XI) and the proposed FL-CPS integration framework (Section II.C) are descriptive syntheses of cited external works; they do not define their inputs in terms of their outputs, nor do they fit parameters and then 'predict' the same fitted values. Some self-citations are present (e.g., refs. [8], [19], and [25] include overlapping author teams), but they serve as background context and are listed in the related-work comparison table rather than functioning as the load-bearing justification of any claimed result. The skeptic's concerns—missing search protocol, untraceable quantitative entries in the taxonomy tables, and cross-paper comparisons across heterogeneous benchmarks—are validity and reproducibility criticisms, not circularity. In fact, Section V.C explicitly concedes that 'there is no standard approach for comparing' FL-CPS solutions and that existing works are tested on 'distinct network setups and data, making direct comparison challenging'; this concession undercuts the survey's comprehensiveness claim but does not make any argument circular. No step in the paper reduces by construction to its own inputs, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a survey, so it introduces no new physical entities. It does propose a conceptual integration framework and uses one hand-chosen parameter (α=0.7). The main axiomatic loads are standard definitions from the literature and the untested assumption that the proposed framework generalizes across CPS domains.

free parameters (1)
  • alpha (α) in hierarchical aggregation = 0.7
    Equation (3) sets α=0.7 to prioritize edge contributions in healthcare CPS. This value is chosen by hand without derivation or sensitivity analysis.
assumptions (3)
  • standard math FL local update and aggregation equations (Eq. 1 and Eq. 2) correctly represent the cited FedAvg framework
    Used in Section II.A as background. These are standard definitions from the FL literature and are not proved in this paper.
  • domain assumption The CPS layered architecture (connection, conversion, cyber, perception, configuration, commercial) is a valid generic model
    Presented in Section II.A.1.b, compiled from CPS literature. The paper treats it as a useful abstraction without formal validation.
  • ad hoc to paper The proposed FL-CPS integration framework (Section II.C) is general enough to cover all surveyed applications
    This framework is introduced by the authors and is not validated against a benchmark, formal model, or real-world deployment.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Federated Learning for Cyber Physical Systems: A Comprehensive Survey." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/E2BTZDMT

@misc{pith2026250504873,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Federated Learning for Cyber Physical Systems: A Comprehensive Survey},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/E2BTZDMT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.04873}
}
read the original abstract

The integration of machine learning (ML) in cyber physical systems (CPS) is a complex task due to the challenges that arise in terms of real-time decision making, safety, reliability, device heterogeneity, and data privacy. There are also open research questions that must be addressed in order to fully realize the potential of ML in CPS. Federated learning (FL), a distributed approach to ML, has become increasingly popular in recent years. It allows models to be trained using data from decentralized sources. This approach has been gaining popularity in the CPS field, as it integrates computer, communication, and physical processes. Therefore, the purpose of this work is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the most recent developments of FL-CPS, including the numerous application areas, system topologies, and algorithms developed in recent years. The paper starts by discussing recent advances in both FL and CPS, followed by their integration. Then, the paper compares the application of FL in CPS with its applications in the internet of things (IoT) in further depth to show their connections and distinctions. Furthermore, the article scrutinizes how FL is utilized in critical CPS applications, e.g., intelligent transportation systems, cybersecurity services, smart cities, and smart healthcare solutions. The study also includes critical insights and lessons learned from various FL-CPS implementations. The paper's concluding section delves into significant concerns and suggests avenues for further research in this fast-paced and dynamic era.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.04873 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The structure of the survey. identified, duplicates can be removed, and the data can be arranged appropriately. At this level, data management and decision-making are handled. 4) Perception layer: This is where troubleshooting happens if problems are found in the system. Simulations of error identification and correction are carried out by algorithms in this layer. Error and failure diagnosis are supervised by the c… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The overall architecture of a typical CPS. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The communication process of FL in CPS. e.g., learning speed and communication iterations. In addition, a selection of CPS actuators that will participate in the FL procedure is determined. The circumstances of the channels and the significance of the local updates of each CPS instrument are two of the plentiful selection parameters that might be used for this selection. 2) Decentralized updates and training from th… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The overall architecture of a typical FL model in CPS. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Personalized FL: The device model integrates both the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The workflow of FTL. 2) Federated Transfer Learning (FTL): In essence, we con￾stantly encounter circumstances in which there are in￾sufficient common characteristics or samples to draw conclusions with confidence. By integrating a FL model with transfer learning (TL) s…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The workflow of SFL. process where clients interact with both a primary and a federated server. Clients process their local data and send ’smashed data’ to the primary server, which performs forward and backward propagation. Gradients are then sent back to the clients …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FL-CPS taxonomy framework structure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: An overview of FL in medical imaging. In addition, the study [148] provides a FL model for brain imaging with the intention of employing deep neural networks (DNN) to aid in brain tumor classification. Each federated provider, similar to an MRI scanner, constructs its …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The application of FL for typical SG in CPS. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: A FL-based parking space estimation scheme. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Blockchain-based FL for vehicular CPS. a significant amount. The in-network computation framework (INC) consists of a user scheduling system, an in-network ag￾gregation procedure, and a network routing algorithm capable of reducing FL training latency by up to 5.6 tim…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Clustered Federated Learning for Generalizable FDIA Detection in Smart Grids with Heterogeneous Data

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    FedClusAvg is claimed to improve FDIA detection accuracy and communication efficiency under non-IID smart grid data, but the weighting formula contradicts the stated mechanism and the evidence is not reproducible.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

250 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [134]

    Differential privacy-enabled federated learning for sensitive health data,

    O. Choudhury, A. Gkoulalas-Divanis, T. Salonidis, I. Sylla, Y . Park, G. Hsu, and A. Das, “Differential privacy-enabled federated learning for sensitive health data,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.02578 , 2019

    arXiv 1910

  2. [127]

    Fedhome: Cloud-edge based personalized federated learning for in-home health monitoring,

    Q. Wu, X. Chen, Z. Zhou, and J. Zhang, “Fedhome: Cloud-edge based personalized federated learning for in-home health monitoring,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing , 2020

    2020

  3. [166]

    Electrical load forecasting using edge com- puting and federated learning,

    A. Ta ¨ık and S. Cherkaoui, “Electrical load forecasting using edge com- puting and federated learning,” in ICC 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) , 2020, pp. 1–6

    2020

  4. [210]

    Experience driven attack design and federated learning based intrusion detection in industry 4.0,

    B. Tahir, A. Jolfaei, and M. Tariq, “Experience driven attack design and federated learning based intrusion detection in industry 4.0,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics , 2021

    work page 2021

  5. [1]

    Cyber-physical systems: matching up its application in the construction industry and other selected industries,

    M. Ikuabe, C. Aigbavboa, and A. Oke, “Cyber-physical systems: matching up its application in the construction industry and other selected industries,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 2020, pp. 10–12

    2020

  6. [2]

    Cyber-physical systems architecture for self-aware machines in industry 4.0 environment,

    B. Bagheri, S. Yang, H.-A. Kao, and J. Lee, “Cyber-physical systems architecture for self-aware machines in industry 4.0 environment,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 1622–1627, 2015

    2015

  7. [3]

    H. Song, G. A. Fink, and S. Jeschke, Security and Privacy in Cyber- Physical Systems: Foundations, Principles, and Applications . John Wiley & Sons, 2017

    2017

  8. [4]

    Artificial intelligence for securing industrial-based cyber–physical systems,

    Z. Lv, D. Chen, R. Lou, and A. Alazab, “Artificial intelligence for securing industrial-based cyber–physical systems,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 117, pp. 291–298, 2021

    2021

Show all 250 references
  1. [5]

    Ai and security of cyber physical systems: Opportunities and challenges,

    J. Sakhnini and H. Karimipour, “Ai and security of cyber physical systems: Opportunities and challenges,” Security of Cyber-Physical Systems, pp. 1–4, 2020

    2020

  2. [6]

    Privacy- preserving big data analytics for cyber-physical systems,

    M. Keshk, N. Moustafa, E. Sitnikova, and B. Turnbull, “Privacy- preserving big data analytics for cyber-physical systems,” Wireless Networks, pp. 1–9, 2018

    2018

  3. [7]

    Cyber physical systems design, methodology, and integration: the current status and future outlook,

    A. Darwish and A. E. Hassanien, “Cyber physical systems design, methodology, and integration: the current status and future outlook,” Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing , vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1541–1556, 2018

    2018

  4. [8]

    Federated learning for Internet of Things: A comprehensive survey,

    D. C. Nguyen, M. Ding, P. N. Pathirana, A. Seneviratne, J. Li, and H. V . Poor, “Federated learning for Internet of Things: A comprehensive survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1622–1658, 2021

    2021

  5. [9]

    Federated learning: Strategies for improving communica- tion efficiency,

    J. Kone ˇcn`y, H. B. McMahan, F. X. Yu, P. Richt ´arik, A. T. Suresh, and D. Bacon, “Federated learning: Strategies for improving communica- tion efficiency,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.05492 , 2016

    2016 arXiv

  6. [10]

    The eu general data protection regulation (gdpr),

    P. V oigt and A. V on dem Bussche, “The eu general data protection regulation (gdpr),” A Practical Guide, 1st Ed., Cham: Springer Inter- national Publishing, vol. 10, no. 3152676, pp. 10–5555, 2017

    2017

  7. [11]

    Profit allocation for federated learning,

    T. Song, Y . Tong, and S. Wei, “Profit allocation for federated learning,” in Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), 2019, pp. 2577–2586

    2019

  8. [12]

    Energy efficient federated learning over wireless communication networks,

    Z. Yang, M. Chen, W. Saad, C. S. Hong, and M. Shikh-Bahaei, “Energy efficient federated learning over wireless communication networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1935–1949, 2020

    1935

  9. [13]

    Federated learning for industrial internet of things in future industries,

    D. C. Nguyen, M. Ding, P. N. Pathirana, A. Seneviratne, J. Li, D. Niyato, and H. V . Poor, “Federated learning for industrial internet of things in future industries,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 192–199, 2021

    2021

  10. [14]

    Ditto: Fair and robust feder- ated learning through personalization,

    T. Li, S. Hu, A. Beirami, and V . Smith, “Ditto: Fair and robust feder- ated learning through personalization,” in International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2021, pp. 6357–6368

    2021

  11. [15]

    Fenghuolun: A federated learning based edge computing platform for cyber-physical systems,

    C. Zhang, X. Liu, X. Zheng, R. Li, and H. Liu, “Fenghuolun: A federated learning based edge computing platform for cyber-physical systems,” in Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops), 2020, pp. 1–4

    2020

  12. [16]

    A blockchain- empowered federated learning in healthcare-based cyber physical sys- tems,

    Y . Liu, W. Yu, Z. Ai, G. Xu, L. Zhao, and Z. Tian, “A blockchain- empowered federated learning in healthcare-based cyber physical sys- tems,” IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering , 2022

    2022

  13. [17]

    A survey on federated learning,

    C. Zhang, Y . Xie, H. Bai, B. Yu, W. Li, and Y . Gao, “A survey on federated learning,” Knowledge-Based Systems , vol. 216, p. 106775, 2021

    2021

  14. [18]

    A survey on federated learning: The journey from centralized to distributed on-site learning and beyond,

    S. AbdulRahman, H. Tout, H. Ould-Slimane, A. Mourad, C. Talhi, and M. Guizani, “A survey on federated learning: The journey from centralized to distributed on-site learning and beyond,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 5476–5497, 2020

    2020

  15. [19]

    Federated learning meets blockchain in edge computing: Opportunities and challenges,

    D. C. Nguyen, M. Ding, Q.-V . Pham, P. N. Pathirana, L. B. Le, A. Seneviratne, J. Li, D. Niyato, and H. V . Poor, “Federated learning meets blockchain in edge computing: Opportunities and challenges,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 8, no. 16, pp. 12 806–12 825, 2021

    2021

  16. [20]

    A survey on federated learning for resource-constrained iot devices,

    A. Imteaj, U. Thakker, S. Wang, J. Li, and M. H. Amini, “A survey on federated learning for resource-constrained iot devices,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2021

    2021

  17. [21]

    Federated learning for uavs- enabled wireless networks: Use cases, challenges, and open problems,

    B. Brik, A. Ksentini, and M. Bouaziz, “Federated learning for uavs- enabled wireless networks: Use cases, challenges, and open problems,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 53 841–53 849, 2020

    2020

  18. [22]

    A survey on federated learning systems: Vision, hype and reality for data privacy and protection,

    Q. Li, Z. Wen, Z. Wu, S. Hu, N. Wang, Y . Li, X. Liu, and B. He, “A survey on federated learning systems: Vision, hype and reality for data privacy and protection,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2021

    2021

  19. [23]

    Federated learn- ing: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications,

    M. Aledhari, R. Razzak, R. M. Parizi, and F. Saeed, “Federated learn- ing: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 140 699–140 725, 2020

    2020

  20. [24]

    Federated learning in mobile edge networks: A comprehensive survey,

    W. Y . B. Lim, N. C. Luong, D. T. Hoang, Y . Jiao, Y .-C. Liang, Q. Yang, D. Niyato, and C. Miao, “Federated learning in mobile edge networks: A comprehensive survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 2031–2063, 2020

    2020

  21. [25]

    Federated learning for smart healthcare: A survey,

    D. C. Nguyen, Q.-V . Pham, P. N. Pathirana, M. Ding, A. Seneviratne, Z. Lin, O. Dobre, and W.-J. Hwang, “Federated learning for smart healthcare: A survey,”ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1–37, 2022

    2022

  22. [26]

    Federated learning review: Fundamentals, enabling technologies, and future applications,

    S. Banabilah, M. Aloqaily, E. Alsayed, N. Malik, and Y . Jararweh, “Federated learning review: Fundamentals, enabling technologies, and future applications,” Information Processing & Management , vol. 59, no. 6, p. 103061, 2022

    2022

  23. [27]

    Open-source federated learning frameworks for iot: A comparative review and analysis,

    I. Kholod, E. Yanaki, D. Fomichev, E. Shalugin, E. Novikova, E. Fil- ippov, and M. Nordlund, “Open-source federated learning frameworks for iot: A comparative review and analysis,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 167, 2020

    2020

  24. [28]

    Fusion of federated learning and industrial internet of things: A survey,

    Q.-V . Pham, K. Dev, P. K. R. Maddikunta, T. R. Gadekallu, T. Huynh- The et al. , “Fusion of federated learning and industrial internet of things: A survey,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.00798 , 2021

    2021 arXiv

  25. [29]

    Blockchain-based federated learning: A compre- hensive survey,

    Z. Wang and Q. Hu, “Blockchain-based federated learning: A compre- hensive survey,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.02182 , 2021

    2021 arXiv

  26. [30]

    A survey on information and communication technologies for industry 4.0: State-of-the-art, tax- onomies, perspectives, and challenges,

    G. Aceto, V . Persico, and A. Pescap ´e, “A survey on information and communication technologies for industry 4.0: State-of-the-art, tax- onomies, perspectives, and challenges,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 3467–3501, 2019

    2019

  27. [31]

    The challenges, approaches, and used techniques of cps for manufacturing in industry 4.0: a liter- ature review,

    B. Dafflon, N. Moalla, and Y . Ouzrout, “The challenges, approaches, and used techniques of cps for manufacturing in industry 4.0: a liter- ature review,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 113, no. 7, pp. 2395–2412, 2021

    2021

  28. [32]

    A review of cps 5 components architecture for manufacturing based on standards,

    A. Ahmadi, C. Cherifi, V . Cheutet, and Y . Ouzrout, “A review of cps 5 components architecture for manufacturing based on standards,” in Proceedings of the 2017 11th International Conference on Soft- ware, Knowledge, Information Management and Applications (SKIMA), 2017, pp. 1–6

    2017

  29. [33]

    K. K. Singh, A. Nayyar, S. Tanwar, and M. Abouhawwash, Emergence of Cyber Physical System and IoT in Smart Automation and Robotics: Computer Engineering in Automation . Springer Nature, 2021

    2021

  30. [34]

    Personalized federated learning: A meta-learning approach,

    A. Fallah, A. Mokhtari, and A. Ozdaglar, “Personalized federated learning: A meta-learning approach,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.07948, 2020

    2002 arXiv

  31. [35]

    Personalized federated learning with moreau envelopes,

    C. T Dinh, N. Tran, and J. Nguyen, “Personalized federated learning with moreau envelopes,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, pp. 21 394–21 405, 2020

    2020

  32. [36]

    Sash: efficient secure aggregation based on shprg for federated learning,

    Z. Liu, S. Chen, J. Ye, J. Fan, H. Li, and X. Li, “Sash: efficient secure aggregation based on shprg for federated learning,” in Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. PMLR, 2022, pp. 1243–1252

    2022

  33. [37]

    Federated learning and meta learning: Approaches, applications, and directions,

    X. Liu, Y . Deng, A. Nallanathan, and M. Bennis, “Federated learning and meta learning: Approaches, applications, and directions,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , 2023

    2023

  34. [38]

    Eefed: Personalized federated learning of execution&evaluation dual network for cps in- trusion detection,

    X. Huang, J. Liu, Y . Lai, B. Mao, and H. Lyu, “Eefed: Personalized federated learning of execution&evaluation dual network for cps in- trusion detection,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2022

    2022

  35. [39]

    Edge intelligence: Paving the last mile of artificial intelligence with edge computing,

    Z. Zhou, X. Chen, E. Li, L. Zeng, K. Luo, and J. Zhang, “Edge intelligence: Paving the last mile of artificial intelligence with edge computing,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 107, no. 8, pp. 1738–1762, 2019. 35

    2019

  36. [40]

    Multi-stage hybrid federated learning over large-scale d2d-enabled fog networks,

    S. Hosseinalipour, S. S. Azam, C. G. Brinton, N. Michelusi, V . Ag- garwal, D. J. Love, and H. Dai, “Multi-stage hybrid federated learning over large-scale d2d-enabled fog networks,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1569–1584, 2022

    2022

  37. [41]

    Edge ai: On-demand ac- celerating deep neural network inference via edge computing,

    E. Li, L. Zeng, Z. Zhou, and X. Chen, “Edge ai: On-demand ac- celerating deep neural network inference via edge computing,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 447–457, 2019

    2019

  38. [42]

    On the relationship between (secure) multi-party computation and (secure) federated learning,

    H. Zhu, “On the relationship between (secure) multi-party computation and (secure) federated learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.02609 , 2020

    2008 arXiv

  39. [43]

    Ppfl: Privacy-preserving federated learning with trusted execution environments,

    F. Mo, H. Haddadi, K. Katevas, E. Marin, D. Perino, and N. Kourtellis, “Ppfl: Privacy-preserving federated learning with trusted execution environments,” in Proceedings of the 19th annual international confer- ence on mobile systems, applications, and services , 2021, pp. 94–108

    2021

  40. [44]

    Elliptic crypt with secured blockchain assisted federated q-learning framework for smart healthcare,

    S. Gajndran, R. Muthusamy, K. Ravi, O. Chandraumakantham, and S. Marappan, “Elliptic crypt with secured blockchain assisted federated q-learning framework for smart healthcare,” IEEE Access, 2024

    2024

  41. [45]

    Federated multi-task learning,

    V . Smith, C.-K. Chiang, M. Sanjabi, and A. S. Talwalkar, “Federated multi-task learning,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Sys- tems, vol. 30, 2017

    2017

  42. [46]

    A collaborative learning framework via federated meta-learning,

    S. Lin, G. Yang, and J. Zhang, “A collaborative learning framework via federated meta-learning,” in Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 40th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS) , 2020, pp. 289–299

    2020

  43. [47]

    Communication-efficient on-device machine learning: Federated dis- tillation and augmentation under non-iid private data,

    E. Jeong, S. Oh, H. Kim, J. Park, M. Bennis, and S.-L. Kim, “Communication-efficient on-device machine learning: Federated dis- tillation and augmentation under non-iid private data,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.11479, 2018

    2018 arXiv

  44. [48]

    A secure federated transfer learning framework,

    Y . Liu, Y . Kang, C. Xing, T. Chen, and Q. Yang, “A secure federated transfer learning framework,” IEEE Intelligent Systems , vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 70–82, 2020

    2020

  45. [49]

    Secure and efficient feder- ated transfer learning,

    S. Sharma, C. Xing, Y . Liu, and Y . Kang, “Secure and efficient feder- ated transfer learning,” in Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) , 2019, pp. 2569–2576

    2019

  46. [50]

    Privacy preserving federated learning solution for security of industrial cyber physical systems,

    S. H. Majidi and H. Asharioun, “Privacy preserving federated learning solution for security of industrial cyber physical systems,” in AI- Enabled Threat Detection and Security Analysis for Industrial IoT . Springer, 2021, pp. 195–211

    2021

  47. [51]

    Splitfed: When federated learning meets split learning,

    C. Thapa, P. C. M. Arachchige, S. Camtepe, and L. Sun, “Splitfed: When federated learning meets split learning,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , vol. 36, no. 8, 2022, pp. 8485–8493

    2022

  48. [52]

    Communication-efficient federated learning with compensated overlap-fedavg,

    Y . Zhou, Q. Ye, and J. Lv, “Communication-efficient federated learning with compensated overlap-fedavg,” IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 192–205, 2021

    2021

  49. [53]

    Federated learning with differential privacy: Algorithms and performance analysis,

    K. Wei, J. Li, M. Ding, C. Ma, H. H. Yang, F. Farokhi, S. Jin, T. Q. Quek, and H. V . Poor, “Federated learning with differential privacy: Algorithms and performance analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security , vol. 15, pp. 3454–3469, 2020

    2020

  50. [54]

    Federated learning with cooper- ating devices: A consensus approach for massive iot networks,

    S. Savazzi, M. Nicoli, and V . Rampa, “Federated learning with cooper- ating devices: A consensus approach for massive iot networks,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 4641–4654, 2020

    2020

  51. [55]

    Latency optimization for blockchain-empowered federated learning in multi-server edge computing,

    D. C. Nguyen, S. Hosseinalipour, D. J. Love, P. N. Pathirana, and C. G. Brinton, “Latency optimization for blockchain-empowered federated learning in multi-server edge computing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.09670, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  52. [56]

    Privacy-preserving blockchain-based federated learning for iot devices,

    Y . Zhao, J. Zhao, L. Jiang, R. Tan, D. Niyato, Z. Li, L. Lyu, and Y . Liu, “Privacy-preserving blockchain-based federated learning for iot devices,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1817–1829, 2020

    2020

  53. [57]

    Flchain: Federated learning via mec- enabled blockchain network,

    U. Majeed and C. S. Hong, “Flchain: Federated learning via mec- enabled blockchain network,” in 2019 20th Asia-Pacific Network Op- erations and Management Symposium (APNOMS) , 2019, pp. 1–4

    2019

  54. [58]

    Towards federated learning using faas fabric,

    M. Chadha, A. Jindal, and M. Gerndt, “Towards federated learning using faas fabric,” in Proceedings of the 2020 Sixth International Workshop on Serverless Computing , 2020, pp. 49–54

    2020

  55. [59]

    Gossip learning as a decentral- ized alternative to federated learning,

    I. Heged ˝us, G. Danner, and M. Jelasity, “Gossip learning as a decentral- ized alternative to federated learning,” inIFIP International Conference on Distributed Applications and Interoperable Systems . Springer, 2019, pp. 74–90

    2019

  56. [60]

    An iot-oriented privacy- preserving publish/subscribe model over blockchains,

    P. Lv, L. Wang, H. Zhu, W. Deng, and L. Gu, “An iot-oriented privacy- preserving publish/subscribe model over blockchains,” IEEE Access , vol. 7, pp. 41 309–41 314, 2019

    2019

  57. [61]

    Big data and stream processing platforms for industry 4.0 requirements mapping for a predictive maintenance use case,

    R. Sahal, J. G. Breslin, and M. I. Ali, “Big data and stream processing platforms for industry 4.0 requirements mapping for a predictive maintenance use case,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems , vol. 54, pp. 138–151, 2020

    2020

  58. [62]

    Mystiko: Cloud-mediated, private, federated gradient descent,

    K. Jayaram, A. Verma, A. Verma, G. Thomas, and C. Sutcher-Shepard, “Mystiko: Cloud-mediated, private, federated gradient descent,” in Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 13th International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD), 2020, pp. 201–210

    2020

  59. [63]

    Differential privacy preservation in deep learning: Challenges, opportunities and solutions,

    J. Zhao, Y . Chen, and W. Zhang, “Differential privacy preservation in deep learning: Challenges, opportunities and solutions,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 48 901–48 911, 2019

    2019

  60. [64]

    The use of artificial intelligence in cyber-physical systems,

    D. Plakhotnikov and E. Kotova, “The use of artificial intelligence in cyber-physical systems,” inProceedings of the 2020 XXIII International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements (SCM) , 2020, pp. 238–241

    2020

  61. [65]

    Cyber physical systems: A smart city perspective,

    F. Khan, R. L. Kumar, S. Kadry, Y . Nam, and M. N. Meqdad, “Cyber physical systems: A smart city perspective,” International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering , vol. 11, no. 4, p. 3609, 2021

    2021

  62. [66]

    Deep learning model construction for a semi-supervised classification with feature learning,

    S. Mandapati, S. Kadry, R. L. Kumar, K. Sutham, and O. Thinnukool, “Deep learning model construction for a semi-supervised classification with feature learning,” Complex & Intelligent Systems, pp. 1–11, 2022

    2022

  63. [67]

    Blockchain and business process management in health care, especially for covid-19 cases,

    I. Abunadi and R. L. Kumar, “Blockchain and business process management in health care, especially for covid-19 cases,” Security and Communication Networks , vol. 2021, 2021

    2021

  64. [68]

    R. C. Poonia, B. Agarwal, S. Kumar, M. Khan, G. Marques, and J. Nayak, Cyber-physical Systems: AI and COVID-19 . Academic Press, 2021

    2021

  65. [69]

    Artificial intelligence for detection, estimation, and compensation of malicious attacks in nonlinear cyber-physical systems and industrial iot,

    F. Farivar, M. S. Haghighi, A. Jolfaei, and M. Alazab, “Artificial intelligence for detection, estimation, and compensation of malicious attacks in nonlinear cyber-physical systems and industrial iot,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics , vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 2716–2725, 2019

    2019

  66. [70]

    Challenges and opportunities of future rural wireless communications,

    Y . Zhang, D. J. Love, J. V . Krogmeier, C. R. Anderson, R. W. Heath, and D. R. Buckmaster, “Challenges and opportunities of future rural wireless communications,” IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 16–22, 2021

    2021

  67. [71]

    Smart monitoring of potato crop: a cyber-physical system architecture model in the field of precision agriculture,

    C.-R. Rad, O. Hancu, I.-A. Takacs, and G. Olteanu, “Smart monitoring of potato crop: a cyber-physical system architecture model in the field of precision agriculture,” Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, vol. 6, pp. 73–79, 2015

    2015

  68. [72]

    Enhancing precision agriculture by internet of things and cyber physical systems,

    R. Fresco and G. Ferrari, “Enhancing precision agriculture by internet of things and cyber physical systems,” Atti Soc. Tosc. Sci. Nat. Mem. Supplemento, vol. 125, pp. 53–60, 2018

    2018

  69. [73]

    Agriculture cyber-physical systems,

    W. An, D. Wu, S. Ci, H. Luo, V . Adamchuk, and Z. Xu, “Agriculture cyber-physical systems,” in Cyber-physical systems . Elsevier, 2017, pp. 399–417

    2017

  70. [74]

    A journey in applying blockchain for cyberphysical systems,

    V . Dedeoglu, A. Dorri, R. Jurdak, R. A. Michelin, R. C. Lunardi, S. S. Kanhere, and A. F. Zorzo, “A journey in applying blockchain for cyberphysical systems,” in Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Communication Systems & NetworkS (COMSNETS) , 2020, pp. 383–390

    2020

  71. [75]

    Dependable iot using blockchain-based technology,

    A. F. Zorzo, H. C. Nunes, R. C. Lunardi, R. A. Michelin, and S. S. Kanhere, “Dependable iot using blockchain-based technology,” in 2018 Eighth Latin-American Symposium on Dependable Computing (LADC), 2018, pp. 1–9

    2018

  72. [76]

    Communications in the 6g era,

    H. Viswanathan and P. E. Mogensen, “Communications in the 6g era,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 57 063–57 074, 2020

    2020

  73. [77]

    5g evolution and 6g,

    T. Nakamura, “5g evolution and 6g,” in 2020 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology, 2020, pp. 1–5

    2020

  74. [78]

    Client-edge-cloud hierarchical federated learning,

    L. Liu, J. Zhang, S. Song, and K. B. Letaief, “Client-edge-cloud hierarchical federated learning,” in ICC 2020-2020 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–6

    2020

  75. [79]

    Hiersfl: Local differential privacy-aided split federated learning in mobile edge computing,

    M. K. Quan, D. C. Nguyen, V .-D. Nguyen, M. Wijayasundara, S. Se- tunge, and P. N. Pathirana, “Hiersfl: Local differential privacy-aided split federated learning in mobile edge computing,” in 2023 IEEE Virtual Conference on Communications (VCC). IEEE, 2023, pp. 103– 108

    2023

  76. [80]

    Federated learning of predictive models from federated electronic health records,

    T. S. Brisimi, R. Chen, T. Mela, A. Olshevsky, I. C. Paschalidis, and W. Shi, “Federated learning of predictive models from federated electronic health records,” International journal of medical informatics, vol. 112, pp. 59–67, 2018

    2018

  77. [81]

    Exploring the synergy: Ai enhancing blockchain, blockchain empowering ai, and their convergence across iot applications and beyond,

    Y . Zuo, “Exploring the synergy: Ai enhancing blockchain, blockchain empowering ai, and their convergence across iot applications and beyond,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , 2024

    2024

  78. [82]

    Noise reduction using kalman filter,

    G. Badhwar, S. Badhwar, and A. S. Sappal, “Noise reduction using kalman filter,” International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology, vol. 7, no. 1, 2016

    2016

  79. [83]

    Federated feature selection for cyber-physical systems of systems,

    P. Cassar ´a, A. Gotta, and L. Valerio, “Federated feature selection for cyber-physical systems of systems,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 71, no. 9, pp. 9937–9950, 2022. 36 IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS & TUTORIALS

    2022

  80. [84]

    Nist cybersecurity framework and mitre cybersecurity criteria,

    D. P. M ¨oller, “Nist cybersecurity framework and mitre cybersecurity criteria,” in Guide to Cybersecurity in Digital Transformation: Trends, Methods, Technologies, Applications and Best Practices . Springer, 2023, pp. 231–271

    2023

  81. [85]

    On convergence of fedprox: Local dissimilarity invariant bounds, non-smoothness and beyond,

    X. Yuan and P. Li, “On convergence of fedprox: Local dissimilarity invariant bounds, non-smoothness and beyond,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 35, pp. 10 752–10 765, 2022

    2022

  82. [86]

    Using shap values and machine learning to understand trends in the transient stability limit,

    R. I. Hamilton and P. N. Papadopoulos, “Using shap values and machine learning to understand trends in the transient stability limit,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems , vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1384–1397, 2023

    2023

  83. [87]

    Uppaal in a nutshell,

    K. G. Larsen, P. Pettersson, and W. Yi, “Uppaal in a nutshell,” International journal on software tools for technology transfer , vol. 1, pp. 134–152, 1997

    1997

  84. [88]

    The tla+ toolbox,

    M. A. Kuppe, L. Lamport, and D. Ricketts, “The tla+ toolbox,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.10633, 2019

    1912 arXiv

  85. [89]

    A review of visualization methods for cyber-physical security: Smart grid case study,

    V . Cobilean, H. S. Mavikumbure, B. J. Mcbride, B. Vaagensmith, V . K. Singh, R. Li, C. Rieger, and M. Manic, “A review of visualization methods for cyber-physical security: Smart grid case study,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 59 788–59 803, 2023

    2023

  86. [90]

    Power system state esti- mation using pmus with imperfect synchronization,

    P. Yang, Z. Tan, A. Wiesel, and A. Nehorai, “Power system state esti- mation using pmus with imperfect synchronization,”IEEE Transactions on power Systems , vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 4162–4172, 2013

    2013

  87. [91]

    Innovation-based optimal linear attacks and detection under kl divergence detector in cyber-physical systems,

    Z. Zhang, B. Liu, and J. Chen, “Innovation-based optimal linear attacks and detection under kl divergence detector in cyber-physical systems,” in 2022 41st Chinese Control Conference (CCC) . IEEE, 2022, pp. 4317–4322

    2022

  88. [92]

    Secure multi-party computation for machine learning: A survey,

    I. Zhou, F. Tofigh, M. Piccardi, M. Abolhasan, D. Franklin, and J. Lipman, “Secure multi-party computation for machine learning: A survey,” IEEE Access, 2024

    2024

  89. [93]

    Data privacy and ransomware impact on cyber-physical systems data protection,

    M. Sohail and S. Tabet, “Data privacy and ransomware impact on cyber-physical systems data protection,” in Cyber-Physical Systems for Industrial Transformation. CRC Press, 2023, pp. 115–134

    2023

  90. [94]

    Resource- efficient federated learning with hierarchical aggregation in edge computing,

    Z. Wang, H. Xu, J. Liu, H. Huang, C. Qiao, and Y . Zhao, “Resource- efficient federated learning with hierarchical aggregation in edge computing,” in IEEE INFOCOM 2021-IEEE conference on computer communications. IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–10

    2021

  91. [95]

    Sensor information processing,

    M. V . Shenoy, “Sensor information processing,” Principles of Internet of Things (IoT) Ecosystem: Insight Paradigm , vol. 174, p. 177, 2019

    2019

  92. [96]

    Design and implementation of encryption/decryption architectures for bfv homomorphic encryption scheme,

    A. C. Mert, E. ¨Ozt¨urk, and E. Savas ¸, “Design and implementation of encryption/decryption architectures for bfv homomorphic encryption scheme,” IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 353–362, 2019

    2019

  93. [97]

    Distributed federated learning-based deep learning model for privacy mri brain tumor detection,

    L. Zhou, M. Wang, and N. Zhou, “Distributed federated learning-based deep learning model for privacy mri brain tumor detection,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.10026, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  94. [98]

    A survey on decentralized federated learning,

    E. Gabrielli, G. Pica, and G. Tolomei, “A survey on decentralized federated learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.04604 , 2023

    2023

  95. [99]

    Federated learning for connected and automated vehicles: A survey of existing approaches and challenges,

    V . P. Chellapandi, L. Yuan, C. G. Brinton, S. H. ˙Zak, and Z. Wang, “Federated learning for connected and automated vehicles: A survey of existing approaches and challenges,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 119–137, 2023

    2023

  96. [100]

    Advanced obstacle recognition and trajectory prediction for autonomous vehicles using 3d cnn and gru,

    Z. Wang, “Advanced obstacle recognition and trajectory prediction for autonomous vehicles using 3d cnn and gru,” Applied and Computa- tional Engineering, vol. 101, pp. 164–174, 2024

    2024

  97. [101]

    Reinforced practical byzantine fault tolerance consensus protocol for cyber physical systems,

    Y . Wu, L. Wu, and H. Cai, “Reinforced practical byzantine fault tolerance consensus protocol for cyber physical systems,” Computer Communications, vol. 203, pp. 238–247, 2023

    2023

  98. [102]

    Bev feature exchange pyramid networks-based 3d object detection in small and distant situa- tions: A decentralized federated learning framework,

    R. Lan, Y . Zhang, L. Xie, Z. Wu, and Y . Liu, “Bev feature exchange pyramid networks-based 3d object detection in small and distant situa- tions: A decentralized federated learning framework,” Neurocomputing, vol. 583, p. 127476, 2024

    2024

  99. [103]

    Hybrid physics-infused 1d-cnn based deep learning framework for diesel engine fault diagnostics,

    S. K. Singh, R. P. Khawale, S. Hazarika, A. Bhatt, B. Gainey, B. Lawler, and R. Rai, “Hybrid physics-infused 1d-cnn based deep learning framework for diesel engine fault diagnostics,” Neural Com- puting and Applications , vol. 36, no. 28, pp. 17 511–17 539, 2024

    2024

  100. [104]

    A survey of architecture, framework and algorithms for resource management in edge computing

    S. Premkumar and A. Sigappi, “A survey of architecture, framework and algorithms for resource management in edge computing.” EAI Endorsed Transactions on the Energy Web , vol. 8, no. 33, 2021

    2021

  101. [105]

    Innovative ci/cd pipeline optimization through canary and blue-green deployment,

    S. Amgothu, “Innovative ci/cd pipeline optimization through canary and blue-green deployment,” International Journal of Computer Ap- plications, vol. 186, no. 50, pp. 1–5, 2024

    2024

  102. [106]

    Secure and provenance enhanced internet of health things framework: A blockchain managed federated learning approach,

    M. A. Rahman, M. S. Hossain, M. S. Islam, N. A. Alrajeh, and G. Muhammad, “Secure and provenance enhanced internet of health things framework: A blockchain managed federated learning approach,” Ieee Access, vol. 8, pp. 205 071–205 087, 2020

    2020

  103. [107]

    Fedpt-v2g: Security enhanced federated trans- former learning for real-time v2g dispatch with non-iid data,

    Y . Shang and S. Li, “Fedpt-v2g: Security enhanced federated trans- former learning for real-time v2g dispatch with non-iid data,” Applied Energy, vol. 358, p. 122626, 2024

    2024

  104. [108]

    Fedper++: Toward improved per- sonalized federated learning on heterogeneous and imbalanced data,

    J. Xu, Y . Yan, and S.-L. Huang, “Fedper++: Toward improved per- sonalized federated learning on heterogeneous and imbalanced data,” in 2022 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) . IEEE, 2022, pp. 01–08

    2022

  105. [109]

    Synthetic minority over-sampling technique (smote),

    B. S. Larsen, “Synthetic minority over-sampling technique (smote),” GitHub (https://github. com/dkbsl/matlab smote/releases/tag/1.0), 2022

    2022

  106. [110]

    A differentially privacy assisted federated learning scheme to preserve data privacy for iomt applications,

    A. Barnawi, P. Chhikara, R. Tekchandani, N. Kumar, and B. Alzahrani, “A differentially privacy assisted federated learning scheme to preserve data privacy for iomt applications,” IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 2024

    2024

  107. [111]

    Application of mobilenetv2 to waste classification,

    L. Yong, L. Ma, D. Sun, and L. Du, “Application of mobilenetv2 to waste classification,” Plos one, vol. 18, no. 3, p. e0282336, 2023

    2023

  108. [112]

    Model-agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation of deep networks,

    C. Finn, P. Abbeel, and S. Levine, “Model-agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation of deep networks,” in International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2017, pp. 1126–1135

    2017

  109. [113]

    Fedxgboost: Privacy-preserving xgboost for federated learning,

    N. K. Le, Y . Liu, Q. M. Nguyen, Q. Liu, F. Liu, Q. Cai, and S. Hirche, “Fedxgboost: Privacy-preserving xgboost for federated learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.10662, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  110. [114]

    Software architectures for health care cyber-physical systems: a systematic literature review,

    A. M. Plaza, J. D ´ıaz, and J. P ´erez, “Software architectures for health care cyber-physical systems: a systematic literature review,” Journal of software: evolution and process , vol. 30, no. 7, p. e1930, 2018

    2018

  111. [115]

    A framework for privacy-preserving multiparty computation with homomorphic encryption and zero- knowledge proofs,

    J. G. Dhokrat, N. Pulgam et al., “A framework for privacy-preserving multiparty computation with homomorphic encryption and zero- knowledge proofs,” Informatica, vol. 48, no. 21, 2024

    2024

  112. [116]

    Design considerations for software only implementations of the ieee 1588 precision time protocol,

    K. Correll, N. Barendt, and M. Branicky, “Design considerations for software only implementations of the ieee 1588 precision time protocol,” in Conference on IEEE , vol. 1588, 2005, pp. 11–15

    2005

  113. [117]

    A novel federated learning approach based on the confidence of federated kalman filters,

    K. Hu, J. Wu, L. Weng, Y . Zhang, F. Zheng, Z. Pang, and M. Xia, “A novel federated learning approach based on the confidence of federated kalman filters,” International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, vol. 12, pp. 3607–3627, 2021

    2021

  114. [118]

    A comprehensive survey of uppaal-assisted formal modeling and verification,

    W. Zhou, Y . Zhao, Y . Zhang, Y . Wang, and M. Yin, “A comprehensive survey of uppaal-assisted formal modeling and verification,” Software: Practice and Experience , vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 272–297, 2025

    2025

  115. [119]

    Deep reinforcement learning for energy-aware intelligent edge computing,

    Y . Zhang, “Deep reinforcement learning for energy-aware intelligent edge computing,” 2024

    2024

  116. [120]

    Dynamic voltage and frequency scaling to improve energy-efficiency of hardware accelerators,

    S. Liu and A. Karanth, “Dynamic voltage and frequency scaling to improve energy-efficiency of hardware accelerators,” in 2021 IEEE 28th International Conference on High Performance Computing, Data, and Analytics (HiPC) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 232–241

    2021

  117. [121]

    Standard devices vs iec 61508 sil safety devices integration in process industry,

    E. Fae and F. Marcel, “Standard devices vs iec 61508 sil safety devices integration in process industry,” in 15. PCIC Europe Annual Electrical and Automation Knowledge Sharing Event , 2018, pp. 199–207

    2018

  118. [122]

    An image segmentation encryption algorithm based on hybrid chaotic system,

    Z. Man, J. Li, X. Di, and O. Bai, “An image segmentation encryption algorithm based on hybrid chaotic system,” IEEE access , vol. 7, pp. 103 047–103 058, 2019

    2019

  119. [123]

    Time-sensitive networking standards,

    J. Farkas, L. L. Bello, and C. Gunther, “Time-sensitive networking standards,” IEEE Communications Standards Magazine , vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 20–21, 2018

    2018

  120. [124]

    Message queuing telemetry transport-secure connection: a power-efficient secure com- munication,

    S. Bhardwaj, S. Harit, Shilpa, and D. Anand, “Message queuing telemetry transport-secure connection: a power-efficient secure com- munication,” International Journal of Sensor Networks , vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 29–40, 2023

    2023

  121. [125]

    Differentially quantized gradi- ent descent,

    C.-Y . Lin, V . Kostina, and B. Hassibi, “Differentially quantized gradi- ent descent,” in 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1200–1205

    2021

  122. [126]

    Health care in the cyberspace: Medical cyber-physical system and digital twin challenges,

    J. I. Jimenez, H. Jahankhani, and S. Kendzierskyj, “Health care in the cyberspace: Medical cyber-physical system and digital twin challenges,” in Digital Twin Technologies and Smart Cities. Springer, 2020, pp. 79–92

    2020

  123. [128]

    Two-stage federated phenotyping and patient representation learning,

    D. Liu, D. Dligach, and T. Miller, “Two-stage federated phenotyping and patient representation learning,” in Proceedings of the Conference. Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting , vol. 2019. NIH Public Access, 2019, p. 283

    2019

  124. [129]

    Fedhealth: A federated transfer learning framework for wearable healthcare,

    Y . Chen, X. Qin, J. Wang, C. Yu, and W. Gao, “Fedhealth: A federated transfer learning framework for wearable healthcare,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 83–93, 2020

    2020

  125. [130]

    A tree-based model averaging approach for personalized treatment effect estimation from heterogeneous data sources,

    X. Tan, C.-C. H. Chang, L. Zhou, and L. Tang, “A tree-based model averaging approach for personalized treatment effect estimation from heterogeneous data sources,” in International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2022, pp. 21 013–21 036. 37

    2022

  126. [131]

    Confederated machine learning on horizontally and vertically separated medical data for large- scale health system intelligence,

    D. Liu, K. Fox, G. Weber, and T. Miller, “Confederated machine learning on horizontally and vertically separated medical data for large- scale health system intelligence,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.02109 , 2019

    1910 arXiv

  127. [132]

    Federated learning with heterogeneous labels and models for mobile activity monitoring,

    G. K. Gudur and S. K. Perepu, “Federated learning with heterogeneous labels and models for mobile activity monitoring,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.02539, 2020

    2012 arXiv

  128. [133]

    Privacy-aware and resource-saving collaborative learning for healthcare in cloud comput- ing,

    M. Hao, H. Li, G. Xu, Z. Liu, and Z. Chen, “Privacy-aware and resource-saving collaborative learning for healthcare in cloud comput- ing,” in ICC 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Communi- cations (ICC), 2020, pp. 1–6

    2020

  129. [135]

    Stochastic channel-based federated learning for medical data privacy preserving,

    R. Shao, H. He, H. Liu, and D. Liu, “Stochastic channel-based federated learning for medical data privacy preserving,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.11160, 2019

    1910 arXiv

  130. [136]

    Fadl: Federated- autonomous deep learning for distributed electronic health record,

    D. Liu, T. Miller, R. Sayeed, and K. D. Mandl, “Fadl: Federated- autonomous deep learning for distributed electronic health record,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.11400 , 2018

    2018 arXiv

  131. [137]

    Loadaboost: Loss-based adaboost federated machine learning with reduced compu- tational complexity on iid and non-iid intensive care data,

    L. Huang, Y . Yin, Z. Fu, S. Zhang, H. Deng, and D. Liu, “Loadaboost: Loss-based adaboost federated machine learning with reduced compu- tational complexity on iid and non-iid intensive care data,” Plos One, vol. 15, no. 4, p. e0230706, 2020

    2020

  132. [138]

    Federated uncertainty-aware learning for distributed hospital ehr data,

    S. Boughorbel, F. Jarray, N. Venugopal, S. Moosa, H. Elhadi, and M. Makhlouf, “Federated uncertainty-aware learning for distributed hospital ehr data,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.12191 , 2019

    1910 arXiv

  133. [139]

    Privacy and trust redefined in federated machine learning,

    P. Papadopoulos, W. Abramson, A. J. Hall, N. Pitropakis, and W. J. Buchanan, “Privacy and trust redefined in federated machine learning,” Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction , vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 333– 356, 2021

    2021

  134. [140]

    Federated and differen- tially private learning for electronic health records,

    S. R. Pfohl, A. M. Dai, and K. Heller, “Federated and differen- tially private learning for electronic health records,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.05861, 2019

    1911 arXiv

  135. [141]

    Variation- aware federated learning with multi-source decentralized medical im- age data,

    Z. Yan, J. Wicaksana, Z. Wang, X. Yang, and K.-T. Cheng, “Variation- aware federated learning with multi-source decentralized medical im- age data,” IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 2615–2628, 2020

    2020

  136. [142]

    Towards efficient federated learning-based scheme in medical cyber-physical systems for dis- tributed data,

    K. Guo, N. Li, J. Kang, and J. Zhang, “Towards efficient federated learning-based scheme in medical cyber-physical systems for dis- tributed data,” Software: Practice and Experience , vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 2274–2289, 2021

    2021

  137. [143]

    Feder: Federated learning through experience replay and privacy-preserving data synthesis,

    M. Pennisi, F. P. Salanitri, G. Bellitto, B. Casella, M. Aldinucci, S. Palazzo, and C. Spampinato, “Feder: Federated learning through experience replay and privacy-preserving data synthesis,” Computer Vision and Image Understanding , vol. 238, p. 103882, 2024

    2024

  138. [144]

    Intracranial hemor- rhage detection using neural network based methods with federated learning,

    U. C. Srivastava, D. Upadhyay, and V . Sharma, “Intracranial hemor- rhage detection using neural network based methods with federated learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.08644 , 2020

    2005 arXiv

  139. [145]

    Dopamine: Differentially private federated learning on medical data,

    M. Malekzadeh, B. Hasircioglu, N. Mital, K. Katarya, M. E. Ozfatura, and D. G ¨und¨uz, “Dopamine: Differentially private federated learning on medical data,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.11693 , 2021

    2021 arXiv

  140. [146]

    Covidiagnosis-net: Deep bayes-squeezenet based diagnosis of the coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) from x-ray images,

    F. Ucar and D. Korkmaz, “Covidiagnosis-net: Deep bayes-squeezenet based diagnosis of the coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) from x-ray images,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 140, p. 109761, 2020

    2019

  141. [147]

    Multi-institutional collaborations for improving deep learning-based magnetic resonance image reconstruction using federated learning,

    P. Guo, P. Wang, J. Zhou, S. Jiang, and V . M. Patel, “Multi-institutional collaborations for improving deep learning-based magnetic resonance image reconstruction using federated learning,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition ,...

    2021

  142. [148]

    Privacy-preserving federated brain tumour segmentation,

    W. Li, F. Milletar `ı, D. Xu, N. Rieke, J. Hancox, W. Zhu, M. Baust, Y . Cheng, S. Ourselin, M. J. Cardoso et al. , “Privacy-preserving federated brain tumour segmentation,” in International Workshop on Machine Learning in Medical Imaging . Springer, 2019, pp. 133–141

    2019

  143. [149]

    Federated learn- ing in medicine: facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data,

    M. J. Sheller, B. Edwards, G. A. Reina, J. Martin, S. Pati, A. Kotrotsou, M. Milchenko, W. Xu, D. Marcus, R. R. Colen et al., “Federated learn- ing in medicine: facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data,” Scientific Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, p...

    2020

  144. [150]

    Federated learning in distributed medical databases: Meta-analysis of large-scale subcortical brain data,

    S. Silva, B. A. Gutman, E. Romero, P. M. Thompson, A. Altmann, and M. Lorenzi, “Federated learning in distributed medical databases: Meta-analysis of large-scale subcortical brain data,” in 2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019) , 2019, pp. 270–274

    2019

  145. [151]

    Integration of federated machine learning and blockchain for the provision of secure big data analytics for internet of things,

    D. Unal, M. Hammoudeh, M. A. Khan, A. Abuarqoub, G. Epiphan- iou, and R. Hamila, “Integration of federated machine learning and blockchain for the provision of secure big data analytics for internet of things,” Computers & Security , vol. 109, p. 102393, 2021

    2021

  146. [152]

    Federated learning for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with covid-19,

    I. Dayan, H. R. Roth, A. Zhong, A. Harouni, A. Gentili, A. Z. Abidin, A. Liu, A. B. Costa, B. J. Wood, C.-S. Tsai et al., “Federated learning for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with covid-19,” Nature Medicine, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 1735–1743, 2021

    2021

  147. [153]

    Predicting adverse drug reactions on distributed health data using federated learning,

    O. Choudhury, Y . Park, T. Salonidis, A. Gkoulalas-Divanis, I. Sylla et al. , “Predicting adverse drug reactions on distributed health data using federated learning,” in AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings , vol. 2019. American Medical Informatics Association, 2019, p. 313

    2019

  148. [154]

    Su-net: an efficient encoder-decoder model of federated learning for brain tumor segmentation,

    L. Yi, J. Zhang, R. Zhang, J. Shi, G. Wang, and X. Liu, “Su-net: an efficient encoder-decoder model of federated learning for brain tumor segmentation,” in International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks. Springer, 2020, pp. 761–773

    2020

  149. [155]

    Multi-institutional deep learning modeling without sharing patient data: A feasibility study on brain tumor segmentation,

    M. J. Sheller, G. A. Reina, B. Edwards, J. Martin, and S. Bakas, “Multi-institutional deep learning modeling without sharing patient data: A feasibility study on brain tumor segmentation,” in International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop. Springer, 2018, pp. 92–104

    2018

  150. [156]

    Automated pancreas segmentation using multi-institutional collaborative deep learning,

    P. Wang, C. Shen, H. R. Roth, D. Yang, D. Xu, M. Oda, K. Mis- awa, P.-T. Chen, K.-L. Liu, W.-C. Liao et al. , “Automated pancreas segmentation using multi-institutional collaborative deep learning,” in Domain Adaptation and Representation Transfer, and Distributed and Collabor...

    2020

  151. [157]

    Integra- tion of blockchain and cloud of things: Architecture, applications and challenges,

    D. C. Nguyen, P. N. Pathirana, M. Ding, and A. Seneviratne, “Integra- tion of blockchain and cloud of things: Architecture, applications and challenges,” IEEE Communications surveys & tutorials , vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2521–2549, 2020

    2020

  152. [158]

    Attack detection using federated learning in medical cyber-physical systems,

    W. Schneble and G. Thamilarasu, “Attack detection using federated learning in medical cyber-physical systems,” in Proc. 28th Int. Conf. Comput. Commun. Netw.(ICCCN) , vol. 29, 2019, pp. 1–8

    2019

  153. [159]

    A hybrid federated learning for medical cyber physical systems,

    R. Tripathy, “A hybrid federated learning for medical cyber physical systems,” in Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking , 2024, pp. 377–381

    2024

  154. [160]

    The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (brats),

    B. H. Menze, A. Jakab, S. Bauer, J. Kalpathy-Cramer, K. Farahani, J. Kirby, Y . Burren, N. Porz, J. Slotboom, R. Wiest et al. , “The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (brats),” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging , vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1993–2024, 2014

    1993

  155. [161]

    Pancreatic cancer: A review of clinical diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes,

    A. McGuigan, P. Kelly, R. C. Turkington, C. Jones, H. G. Coleman, and R. S. McCain, “Pancreatic cancer: A review of clinical diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes,” World Journal of Gastroen- terology, vol. 24, no. 43, p. 4846, 2018

    2018

  156. [162]

    Clusterfl: A clustering-based federated learning system for human activity recogni- tion,

    X. Ouyang, Z. Xie, J. Zhou, G. Xing, and J. Huang, “Clusterfl: A clustering-based federated learning system for human activity recogni- tion,” ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN) , 2022

    2022

  157. [163]

    Cyber physical systems and smart cities,

    N. Kesswani and S. Kumar, “Cyber physical systems and smart cities,” CSI CommuniCationS, 2017

    2017

  158. [164]

    Dual-branch cnn for the identification of recyclable materials,

    A. V ogiatzis, G. Chalkiadakis, K. Moirogiorgou, G. Livanos, M. Pa- padogiorgaki, and M. Zervakis, “Dual-branch cnn for the identification of recyclable materials,” in Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST) , 2021, pp. 1–6

    2021

  159. [165]

    Active learning based federated learning for waste and natural disaster image classification,

    L. Ahmed, K. Ahmad, N. Said, B. Qolomany, J. Qadir, and A. Al- Fuqaha, “Active learning based federated learning for waste and natural disaster image classification,” IEEE Access , vol. 8, pp. 208 518– 208 531, 2020

    2020

  160. [167]

    A federated learning framework for smart grids: Securing power traces in collaborative learning,

    H. Liu, X. Zhang, X. Shen, and H. Sun, “A federated learning framework for smart grids: Securing power traces in collaborative learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.11870 , 2021

    2021 arXiv

  161. [168]

    Feddetect: A novel privacy-preserving federated learning framework for energy theft detection in smart grid,

    M. Wen, R. Xie, K. Lu, L. Wang, and K. Zhang, “Feddetect: A novel privacy-preserving federated learning framework for energy theft detection in smart grid,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 6069–6080, 2021

    2021

  162. [169]

    Exploiting unlabeled data in smart cities using federated edge learning,

    A. Albaseer, B. S. Ciftler, M. Abdallah, and A. Al-Fuqaha, “Exploiting unlabeled data in smart cities using federated edge learning,” in 2020 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (IWCMC), 2020, pp. 1666–1671

    2020

  163. [170]

    Semisupervised distributed learning with non-iid data for aiot service platform,

    T.-C. Chiu, Y .-Y . Shih, A.-C. Pang, C.-S. Wang, W. Weng, and C.-T. Chou, “Semisupervised distributed learning with non-iid data for aiot service platform,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 9266–9277, 2020

    2020

  164. [171]

    Ubiquitous computing and distributed machine learn- ing in smart cities,

    D. Mukhametov, “Ubiquitous computing and distributed machine learn- ing in smart cities,” in 2020 Wave Electronics and its Application in Information and Telecommunication Systems (WECONF) , 2020, pp. 1–5. 38 IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS & TUTORIALS

    2020

  165. [172]

    Fedparking: A federated learning based parking space estimation with parked vehicle assisted edge computing,

    X. Huang, P. Li, R. Yu, Y . Wu, K. Xie, and S. Xie, “Fedparking: A federated learning based parking space estimation with parked vehicle assisted edge computing,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 9355–9368, 2021

    2021

  166. [173]

    Multi-dimensional contract-matching for federated learning in uav-enabled internet of vehicles,

    W. Y . B. Lim, J. Huang, Z. Xiong, J. Kang, D. Niyato, X.-S. Hua, C. Leung, and C. Miao, “Multi-dimensional contract-matching for federated learning in uav-enabled internet of vehicles,” in GLOBECOM 2020-2020 IEEE Global Communications Conference , 2020, pp. 1–6

    2020

  167. [174]

    Uav communications for sustainable federated learning,

    Q.-V . Pham, M. Zeng, R. Ruby, T. Huynh-The, and W.-J. Hwang, “Uav communications for sustainable federated learning,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 3944–3948, 2021

    2021

  168. [175]

    Assessment of methane emissions and energy recovery potential from the municipal solid waste landfills of delhi, india,

    P. Ghosh, G. Shah, R. Chandra, S. Sahota, H. Kumar, V . K. Vijay, and I. S. Thakur, “Assessment of methane emissions and energy recovery potential from the municipal solid waste landfills of delhi, india,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 272, pp. 611–615, 2019

    2019

  169. [176]

    Towards privacy-preserving waste classification in the internet of things,

    M. K. Quan, D. C. Nguyen, V .-D. Nguyen, M. Wijayasundara, S. Setunge, and P. N. Pathirana, “Towards privacy-preserving waste classification in the internet of things,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2024

    2024

  170. [177]

    Forecasting municipal solid waste quantity using artificial neural network and supported vector machine techniques: A case study of johannesburg, south africa,

    O. Ayeleru, L. Fajimi, B. Oboirien, and P. Olubambi, “Forecasting municipal solid waste quantity using artificial neural network and supported vector machine techniques: A case study of johannesburg, south africa,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 289, p. 125671, 2021

    2021

  171. [178]

    Comparative study of predicting hospital solid waste generation using multiple linear regression and artificial intelligence,

    S. Golbaz, R. Nabizadeh, and H. S. Sajadi, “Comparative study of predicting hospital solid waste generation using multiple linear regression and artificial intelligence,” Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering , vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 41–51, 2019

    2019

  172. [179]

    Application of artificial intelligence neural network modeling to predict the generation of domestic, commercial and construction wastes,

    G. Coskuner, M. S. Jassim, M. Zontul, and S. Karateke, “Application of artificial intelligence neural network modeling to predict the generation of domestic, commercial and construction wastes,” Waste Management & Research, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 499–507, 2021

    2021

  173. [180]

    Forecasting municipal solid waste generation using artificial intelligence models—a case study in india,

    U. Soni, A. Roy, A. Verma, and V . Jain, “Forecasting municipal solid waste generation using artificial intelligence models—a case study in india,” SN Applied Sciences , vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2019

    2019

  174. [181]

    Cyber– physical production systems for data-driven, decentralized, and secure manufacturing—a perspective,

    M. Suvarna, K. S. Yap, W. Yang, J. Li, Y . T. Ng, and X. Wang, “Cyber– physical production systems for data-driven, decentralized, and secure manufacturing—a perspective,” Engineering, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 1212– 1223, 2021

    2021

  175. [182]

    Towards iec 61499 based distributed intelligent automation: Design and computing perspectives,

    G. Lyu and R. W. Brennan, “Towards iec 61499 based distributed intelligent automation: Design and computing perspectives,” in Pro- ceedings of the 2019 IEEE 17th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), vol. 1, 2019, pp. 160–163

    2019

  176. [183]

    Energy demand prediction with fed- erated learning for electric vehicle networks,

    Y . M. Saputra, D. T. Hoang, D. N. Nguyen, E. Dutkiewicz, M. D. Mueck, and S. Srikanteswara, “Energy demand prediction with fed- erated learning for electric vehicle networks,” in Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) , 2019, pp. 1–6

    2019

  177. [184]

    Fedvision: An online visual object detection platform powered by federated learning,

    Y . Liu, A. Huang, Y . Luo, H. Huang, Y . Liu, Y . Chen, L. Feng, T. Chen, H. Yu, and Q. Yang, “Fedvision: An online visual object detection platform powered by federated learning,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 34, no. 08, 2020, pp. 13...

    2020

  178. [185]

    The integration of cps, cpss, and its: A focus on data,

    W. Guo, Y . Zhang, and L. Li, “The integration of cps, cpss, and its: A focus on data,” Tsinghua Science and Technology , vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 327–335, 2015

    2015

  179. [186]

    Marwedel, Embedded system design: embedded systems foundations of cyber-physical systems, and the internet of things

    P. Marwedel, Embedded system design: embedded systems foundations of cyber-physical systems, and the internet of things . Springer Nature, 2021

    2021

  180. [187]

    Cyber–physical systems expression in industry 4.0 context,

    V . Navickas, S. Kuznetsova, V . Gruzauskas et al. , “Cyber–physical systems expression in industry 4.0 context,” Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice , vol. 2, no. 23, pp. 188–197, 2017

    2017

  181. [188]

    Study of connectivity probability of vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communication sys- tems,

    J. Zhao, Y . Chen, and Y . Gong, “Study of connectivity probability of vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communication sys- tems,” in Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 83rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring) , 2016, pp. 1–4

    2016

  182. [189]

    Fastgnn: A topological information protected federated learning approach for traffic speed forecasting,

    C. Zhang, S. Zhang, J. James, and S. Yu, “Fastgnn: A topological information protected federated learning approach for traffic speed forecasting,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics , vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 8464–8474, 2021

    2021

  183. [190]

    Privacy-preserving traffic flow prediction: A federated learning approach,

    Y . Liu, J. James, J. Kang, D. Niyato, and S. Zhang, “Privacy-preserving traffic flow prediction: A federated learning approach,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 7751–7763, 2020

    2020

  184. [191]

    Block4forensic: An integrated lightweight blockchain framework for forensics applications of connected vehicles,

    M. Cebe, E. Erdin, K. Akkaya, H. Aksu, and S. Uluagac, “Block4forensic: An integrated lightweight blockchain framework for forensics applications of connected vehicles,” IEEE communications magazine, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 50–57, 2018

    2018

  185. [192]

    Fe- drd: Privacy-preserving adaptive federated learning framework for intelligent hazardous road damage detection and warning,

    Y . Yuan, Y . Yuan, T. Baker, L. M. Kolbe, and D. Hogrefe, “Fe- drd: Privacy-preserving adaptive federated learning framework for intelligent hazardous road damage detection and warning,” Future Generation Computer Systems , vol. 125, pp. 385–398, 2021

    2021

  186. [193]

    Time-dependent decentralized routing using federated learning,

    M. Wilbur, C. Samal, J. P. Talusan, K. Yasumoto, and A. Dubey, “Time-dependent decentralized routing using federated learning,” in 2020 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC), 2020, pp. 56–64

    2020

  187. [194]

    A decentralized federated learning ap- proach for connected autonomous vehicles,

    S. R. Pokhrel and J. Choi, “A decentralized federated learning ap- proach for connected autonomous vehicles,” in Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops (WCNCW), 2020, pp. 1–6

    2020

  188. [195]

    Energy-aware blockchain and federated learning-supported vehicular networks,

    M. Aloqaily, I. Al Ridhawi, and M. Guizani, “Energy-aware blockchain and federated learning-supported vehicular networks,” IEEE Transac- tions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , 2021

    2021

  189. [196]

    Decentralized federated learning for extended sensing in 6g connected vehicles,

    L. Barbieri, S. Savazzi, M. Brambilla, and M. Nicoli, “Decentralized federated learning for extended sensing in 6g connected vehicles,” Vehicular Communications, vol. 33, p. 100396, 2022

    2022

  190. [197]

    Vehicle selection and resource optimization for federated learning in vehicular edge computing,

    H. Xiao, J. Zhao, Q. Pei, J. Feng, L. Liu, and W. Shi, “Vehicle selection and resource optimization for federated learning in vehicular edge computing,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , 2021

    2021

  191. [198]

    Federated learning empowered computation offloading and resource management in 6g-v2x,

    S. B. Prathiba, G. Raja, S. Anbalagan, K. Dev, S. Gurumoorthy, and A. P. Sankaran, “Federated learning empowered computation offloading and resource management in 6g-v2x,” IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering , 2021

    2021

  192. [199]

    Privacy- preserving federated learning for uav-enabled networks: Learning- based joint scheduling and resource management,

    H. Yang, J. Zhao, Z. Xiong, K.-Y . Lam, S. Sun, and L. Xiao, “Privacy- preserving federated learning for uav-enabled networks: Learning- based joint scheduling and resource management,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 3144–3159, 2021

    2021

  193. [200]

    Towards federated learning in uav-enabled internet of vehicles: A multi-dimensional contract-matching approach,

    W. Y . B. Lim, J. Huang, Z. Xiong, J. Kang, D. Niyato, X.-S. Hua, C. Leung, and C. Miao, “Towards federated learning in uav-enabled internet of vehicles: A multi-dimensional contract-matching approach,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 22, no. 8, p...

    2021

  194. [201]

    Bfrt: Blockchained federated learning for real-time traffic flow prediction,

    C. Meese, H. Chen, S. A. Asif, W. Li, C.-C. Shen, and M. Nejad, “Bfrt: Blockchained federated learning for real-time traffic flow prediction,” in 2022 22nd IEEE International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Internet Computing (CCGrid) , 2022, pp. 317–326

    2022

  195. [202]

    Multi-task federated learning for traffic prediction and its application to route planning,

    T. Zeng, J. Guo, K. J. Kim, K. Parsons, P. Orlik, S. Di Cairano, and W. Saad, “Multi-task federated learning for traffic prediction and its application to route planning,” in 2021 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2021, pp. 451–457

    2021

  196. [203]

    Brainiot: Brain-like productive services provisioning with federated learning in industrial iot,

    H. Yang, J. Yuan, C. Li, G. Zhao, Z. Sun, Q. Yao, B. Bao, A. V . Vasilakos, and J. Zhang, “Brainiot: Brain-like productive services provisioning with federated learning in industrial iot,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 2014–2024, 2021

    2014

  197. [204]

    Federated learning for wireless communications: Motivation, opportunities, and challenges,

    S. Niknam, H. S. Dhillon, and J. H. Reed, “Federated learning for wireless communications: Motivation, opportunities, and challenges,” IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 46–51, 2020

    2020

  198. [205]

    Deep learning for reliable mo- bile edge analytics in intelligent transportation systems: An overview,

    A. Ferdowsi, U. Challita, and W. Saad, “Deep learning for reliable mo- bile edge analytics in intelligent transportation systems: An overview,” ieee vehicular technology magazine , vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 62–70, 2019

    2019

  199. [206]

    Federated learning in vehicular networks: opportunities and solutions,

    J. Posner, L. Tseng, M. Aloqaily, and Y . Jararweh, “Federated learning in vehicular networks: opportunities and solutions,” IEEE Network , vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 152–159, 2021

    2021

  200. [207]

    In-network computation for large-scale federated learning over wire- less edge networks,

    T. Q. Dinh, D. N. Nguyen, D. T. Hoang, T. V . Pham, and E. Dutkiewicz, “In-network computation for large-scale federated learning over wire- less edge networks,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing , 2022

    2022

  201. [208]

    Differentially private asynchronous federated learning for mobile edge computing in urban informatics,

    Y . Lu, X. Huang, Y . Dai, S. Maharjan, and Y . Zhang, “Differentially private asynchronous federated learning for mobile edge computing in urban informatics,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics , vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 2134–2143, 2019

    2019

  202. [209]

    Challenges and opportunities for beyond-5g wireless security,

    E. Ruzomberka, D. J. Love, C. G. Brinton, A. Gupta, C.-C. Wang, and H. V . Poor, “Challenges and opportunities for beyond-5g wireless security,” IEEE Security & Privacy , vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 55–66, 2023

    2023

  203. [211]

    Oqfl: An optimized quantum-based federated learning framework for defending against adversarial attacks in intelligent transportation systems,

    W. Yamany, N. Moustafa, and B. Turnbull, “Oqfl: An optimized quantum-based federated learning framework for defending against adversarial attacks in intelligent transportation systems,” IEEE Trans- actions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , 2021. 39

    2021

  204. [212]

    Privacy-preserved cyberattack detection in industrial edge of things (ieot): A blockchain- orchestrated federated learning approach,

    M. Abdel-Basset, N. Moustafa, and H. Hawash, “Privacy-preserved cyberattack detection in industrial edge of things (ieot): A blockchain- orchestrated federated learning approach,” IEEE Transactions on In- dustrial Informatics, 2022

    2022

  205. [213]

    Deep federated learning enhanced secure poi microservices for cyber- physical systems,

    Z. Guo, K. Yu, Z. Lv, K.-K. R. Choo, P. Shi, and J. J. Rodrigues, “Deep federated learning enhanced secure poi microservices for cyber- physical systems,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 22–29, 2022

    2022

  206. [214]

    Federated learning for drone authentication,

    A. Yazdinejad, R. M. Parizi, A. Dehghantanha, and H. Karimipour, “Federated learning for drone authentication,” Ad Hoc Networks , vol. 120, p. 102574, 2021

    2021

  207. [215]

    Federated learning for ma- chinery fault diagnosis with dynamic validation and self-supervision,

    W. Zhang, X. Li, H. Ma, Z. Luo, and X. Li, “Federated learning for ma- chinery fault diagnosis with dynamic validation and self-supervision,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 213, p. 106679, 2021

    2021

  208. [216]

    Blockchain and federated learning for collaborative intrusion detec- tion in vehicular edge computing,

    H. Liu, S. Zhang, P. Zhang, X. Zhou, X. Shao, G. Pu, and Y . Zhang, “Blockchain and federated learning for collaborative intrusion detec- tion in vehicular edge computing,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 6073–6084, 2021

    2021

  209. [217]

    Deepfed: Feder- ated deep learning for intrusion detection in industrial cyber–physical systems,

    B. Li, Y . Wu, J. Song, R. Lu, T. Li, and L. Zhao, “Deepfed: Feder- ated deep learning for intrusion detection in industrial cyber–physical systems,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics , vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 5615–5624, 2020

    2020

  210. [218]

    Chained anomaly detection models for federated learning: An intrusion detection case study,

    D. Preuveneers, V . Rimmer, I. Tsingenopoulos, J. Spooren, W. Joosen, and E. Ilie-Zudor, “Chained anomaly detection models for federated learning: An intrusion detection case study,” Applied Sciences, vol. 8, no. 12, p. 2663, 2018

    2018

  211. [219]

    Fldid: Federated learning enabled deep intrusion detection in smart manufacturing industries,

    P. Verma, J. G. Breslin, and D. O’Shea, “Fldid: Federated learning enabled deep intrusion detection in smart manufacturing industries,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 22, p. 8974, 2022

    2022

  212. [220]

    Local model poisoning attacks to{Byzantine-Robust} federated learning,

    M. Fang, X. Cao, J. Jia, and N. Gong, “Local model poisoning attacks to{Byzantine-Robust} federated learning,” in 29th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 20) , 2020, pp. 1605–1622

    2020

  213. [221]

    A little is enough: Cir- cumventing defenses for distributed learning,

    G. Baruch, M. Baruch, and Y . Goldberg, “A little is enough: Cir- cumventing defenses for distributed learning,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 32, 2019

    2019

  214. [222]

    The hidden vulnerability of distributed learning in byzantium,

    R. Guerraoui, S. Rouault et al., “The hidden vulnerability of distributed learning in byzantium,” in International Conference on Machine Learn- ing. PMLR, 2018, pp. 3521–3530

    2018

  215. [223]

    Analyzing feder- ated learning through an adversarial lens,

    A. N. Bhagoji, S. Chakraborty, P. Mittal, and S. Calo, “Analyzing feder- ated learning through an adversarial lens,” in International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 2019, pp. 634–643

    2019

  216. [224]

    How to backdoor federated learning,

    E. Bagdasaryan, A. Veit, Y . Hua, D. Estrin, and V . Shmatikov, “How to backdoor federated learning,” in International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics . PMLR, 2020, pp. 2938–2948

    2020

  217. [225]

    Fall of empires: Breaking byzantine- tolerant sgd by inner product manipulation,

    C. Xie, O. Koyejo, and I. Gupta, “Fall of empires: Breaking byzantine- tolerant sgd by inner product manipulation,” in Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. PMLR, 2020, pp. 261–270

    2020

  218. [226]

    Manipulating machine learning: Poisoning attacks and countermea- sures for regression learning,

    M. Jagielski, A. Oprea, B. Biggio, C. Liu, C. Nita-Rotaru, and B. Li, “Manipulating machine learning: Poisoning attacks and countermea- sures for regression learning,” in 2018 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) , 2018, pp. 19–35

    2018

  219. [227]

    The limitations of feder- ated learning in sybil settings,

    C. Fung, C. J. Yoon, and I. Beschastnikh, “The limitations of feder- ated learning in sybil settings,” in 23rd International Symposium on Research in Attacks, Intrusions and Defenses (RAID 2020) , 2020, pp. 301–316

    2020

  220. [228]

    Mitigating backdoor attacks in federated learning,

    C. Wu, X. Yang, S. Zhu, and P. Mitra, “Mitigating backdoor attacks in federated learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.01767 , 2020

    2011 arXiv

  221. [229]

    Mitigating sybils in federated learning poisoning,

    C. Fung, C. J. Yoon, and I. Beschastnikh, “Mitigating sybils in federated learning poisoning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.04866, 2018

    2018 arXiv

  222. [230]

    Detecting and mitigating poisoning attacks in federated learning using generative adversarial networks,

    Y . Zhao, J. Chen, J. Zhang, D. Wu, M. Blumenstein, and S. Yu, “Detecting and mitigating poisoning attacks in federated learning using generative adversarial networks,” Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience , vol. 34, no. 7, p. e5906, 2022

    2022

  223. [231]

    Client selection for federated learning with heterogeneous resources in mobile edge,

    T. Nishio and R. Yonetani, “Client selection for federated learning with heterogeneous resources in mobile edge,” in ICC 2019-2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) , 2019, pp. 1–7

    2019

  224. [232]

    Federated learning for energy-efficient task computing in wireless networks,

    S. Wang, M. Chen, W. Saad, and C. Yin, “Federated learning for energy-efficient task computing in wireless networks,” in ICC 2020- 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) , 2020, pp. 1–6

    2020

  225. [233]

    Client selection and bandwidth allocation in wireless federated learning networks: A long-term perspective,

    J. Xu and H. Wang, “Client selection and bandwidth allocation in wireless federated learning networks: A long-term perspective,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1188– 1200, 2020

    2020

  226. [234]

    Federated learning for task and resource allocation in wireless high- altitude balloon networks,

    S. Wang, M. Chen, C. Yin, W. Saad, C. S. Hong, S. Cui, and H. V . Poor, “Federated learning for task and resource allocation in wireless high- altitude balloon networks,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 8, no. 24, pp. 17 460–17 475, 2021

    2021

  227. [235]

    Device scheduling with fast convergence for wireless federated learning,

    W. Shi, S. Zhou, and Z. Niu, “Device scheduling with fast convergence for wireless federated learning,” in ICC 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) , 2020, pp. 1–6

    2020

  228. [236]

    Federated learning via over- the-air computation,

    K. Yang, T. Jiang, Y . Shi, and Z. Ding, “Federated learning via over- the-air computation,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 2022–2035, 2020

    2022

  229. [237]

    Enhancing federated learning in fog-aided iot by cpu frequency and wireless power control,

    J. Yao and N. Ansari, “Enhancing federated learning in fog-aided iot by cpu frequency and wireless power control,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 3438–3445, 2020

    2020

  230. [238]

    Federated learning over wireless networks: Optimization model design and analysis,

    N. H. Tran, W. Bao, A. Zomaya, M. N. Nguyen, and C. S. Hong, “Federated learning over wireless networks: Optimization model design and analysis,” inIEEE INFOCOM 2019-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, 2019, pp. 1387–1395

    2019

  231. [239]

    Blockchained federated learning for privacy and security preservation: Practical example of diagnosing cerebellar ataxia,

    T. Ngo, D. C. Nguyen, P. N. Pathirana, L. A. Corben, M. Horne, and D. J. Szmulewicz, “Blockchained federated learning for privacy and security preservation: Practical example of diagnosing cerebellar ataxia,” in 2022 44th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering...

    2022

  232. [240]

    White paper-ieee federated machine learning,

    F. Qiang, T. Lixin, L. Richard et al. , “White paper-ieee federated machine learning,” 2021

    2021

  233. [241]

    Towards a virtual factory prototype,

    S. Jain, D. Lechevalier, J. Woo, and S.-J. Shin, “Towards a virtual factory prototype,” in Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), 2015, pp. 2207–2218

    2015

  234. [242]

    Towards a semantic administrative shell for industry 4.0 components,

    I. Grangel-Gonz ´alez, L. Halilaj, G. Coskun, S. Auer, D. Collarana, and M. Hoffmeister, “Towards a semantic administrative shell for industry 4.0 components,” in Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC) , 2016, pp. 230–237

    2016

  235. [243]

    Robust aggregation for federated learning,

    K. Pillutla, S. M. Kakade, and Z. Harchaoui, “Robust aggregation for federated learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.13445 , 2019

    1912 arXiv

  236. [244]

    Robust federated learning with noisy communication,

    F. Ang, L. Chen, N. Zhao, Y . Chen, W. Wang, and F. R. Yu, “Robust federated learning with noisy communication,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 3452–3464, 2020

    2020

  237. [245]

    Robust aggregation for adaptive privacy preserving federated learning in healthcare,

    M. Grama, M. Musat, L. Mu ˜noz-Gonz´alez, J. Passerat-Palmbach, D. Rueckert, and A. Alansary, “Robust aggregation for adaptive privacy preserving federated learning in healthcare,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.08294, 2020

    2009 arXiv

  238. [246]

    Federated learning with adaptive communication compression under dynamic bandwidth and unreliable networks,

    X. Zhang, X. Zhu, J. Wang, H. Yan, H. Chen, and W. Bao, “Federated learning with adaptive communication compression under dynamic bandwidth and unreliable networks,” Information Sciences , vol. 540, pp. 242–262, 2020

    2020

  239. [247]

    Adaptive federated learning in resource constrained edge computing systems,

    S. Wang, T. Tuor, T. Salonidis, K. K. Leung, C. Makaya, T. He, and K. Chan, “Adaptive federated learning in resource constrained edge computing systems,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communica- tions, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1205–1221, 2019

    2019

  240. [248]

    On the ozarow-leung scheme for the gaussian broadcast channel with feedback,

    Y . Murin, Y . Kaspi, and R. Dabora, “On the ozarow-leung scheme for the gaussian broadcast channel with feedback,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 948–952, 2014

    2014

  241. [249]

    An achievable region and outer bound for the gaussian broadcast channel with feedback (corresp.),

    L. Ozarow and S. Leung-Yan-Cheong, “An achievable region and outer bound for the gaussian broadcast channel with feedback (corresp.),” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 667– 671, 1984

    1984

  242. [250]

    Concatenated coding using linear schemes for gaussian broadcast channels with noisy channel output feedback,

    Z. Ahmad, Z. Chance, D. J. Love, and C.-C. Wang, “Concatenated coding using linear schemes for gaussian broadcast channels with noisy channel output feedback,” IEEE Transactions on Communications , vol. 63, no. 11, pp. 4576–4590, 2015

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.