Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

Fractional Chern Insulators and Competing States in a Twisted MoTe$_2$ Lattice Model

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Direct spin exchange stabilizes the Chern ferromagnet in twisted MoTe2; band mixing pushes toward charge order.

desk verdict Solid iDMRG study of twisted MoTe2 that convincingly identifies direct spin exchange as the ferromagnetic driver; the band-mixing claim about CDWs is plausible but rests on correlation, not a controlled test. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.06354 v1 pith:A53BTLOK submitted 2025-05-09 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.stat-mech

Yuchi He , S.H. Simon , S.A. Parameswaran This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.stat-mech
keywords fractionalCherninsulatortwistedMoTe2moirématerialsferromagnetismchargedensitywavebandmixingmatrixrenormalizationgroupWannierorbitalmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper constructs a two-band interacting lattice model for twisted MoTe2 near the 3.7-degree twist angle and uses infinite density-matrix renormalization group (iDMRG) on cylinders to map which zero-field phase wins at four hole fillings. Its central claim is that the direct spin-exchange part of the Coulomb interaction, generated by the overlap of neighboring Wannier orbitals, is what stabilizes the valley-polarized Chern ferromagnet that hosts integer and fractional Chern insulators (FCIs, lattice analogs of fractional quantum Hall states at zero magnetic field). Its second claim is that mixing with the second valence band acts against Chern insulators and FCIs, favoring charge density waves, with the balance set by the dielectric constant, gate screening length, and displacement field. If correct, this explains why FCIs in twisted MoTe2 survive despite non-flat bands, why certain fillings instead host trivial charge-ordered states, and how screening geometry tunes between them.

What carries the argument

The central object is the lattice Hamiltonian in Eq. (3): an extended Kane-Mele-type model on the honeycomb lattice with two spinful Wannier orbitals per site, third-neighbor hoppings, dual-gate-screened density-density interactions, short-range spin exchange, assisted hopping, and pair hopping. It is solved with iDMRG on YC5/YC6 cylinders; FCIs are identified by charge pumping under flux insertion, by the artificial CDW order that represents topological degeneracy on finite cylinders, and by Hall conductance, while lower-band occupation tracks band mixing. This machinery matters because it lets all spin sectors compete, allows band mixing explicitly, and admits CDW orders whose wavelengths fit the cylinder.

What would settle it

Measure the $\nu=-2/3$ Hall conductance and spin polarization in devices with gate distance $d=66$ Å and $d=102$ Å; the model predicts the FCI should be suppressed or absent at the smaller $d$ for the same dielectric constant. Alternatively, repeat the iDMRG calculation with the spin-exchange terms set to zero: the paper claims ferromagnetism at $\nu=-2/3$ should disappear, so a polarized FCI in that calculation would contradict the proposed mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper constructs an extended Kane-Mele model on a honeycomb lattice whose Wannier orbitals are fit to DFT bands, with hoppings to third neighbors and Coulomb interactions including density-density, $\hat z$ and transverse spin exchange, assisted hopping, and pair hopping. In this model, removing the spin-exchange terms destroys ferromagnetism at $\nu=-2/3$, while the density-density and kinetic terms alone do not stabilize it. Band mixing, measured by the occupation of the second valence band, rises sharply at the FCI-to-CDW transition at $\nu=-1/3$ and $\nu=-1$, but is decoupled from that transition at $\nu=-2/3$ and $\nu=-3/5$, where FCIs tolerate about 10 percent band mixing. The paper's phase diagrams show FCI/CI, CDW, and spin-polarized Fermi liquid regions at fillings $\nu=-1$, $-2/3$, $-3/5$, and $-1/3$ as functions of $\epsilon$ and screening length $d$, together with a displacement-field-driven FCI-to-CDW transition at $\nu=-2/3$; finite-size and correlation-length checks are used to argue the Chern and FCI states remain robust even where a competing CDW fits on the cylinder.

Load-bearing premise

The entire phase diagram rests on the two-band Wannier model fitted to DFT bands at 3.89 degrees faithfully representing twisted MoTe2 near 3.7 degrees, despite truncating hoppings and interactions to short range and treating screening with one dielectric constant and two gate distances.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At $\nu=-2/3$ and $\nu=-3/5$, fractional Chern insulators remain stable against roughly 10 percent mixing with the second valence band, so the strict single-band Landau-level picture is not required for their existence.
  • Increasing the dual-gate screening distance $d$ stabilizes FCIs; stronger screening (smaller $d$) shrinks the FCI regions, so gate geometry is a practical tuning knob.
  • At $\nu=-1/3$ the FCI survives only where band mixing is negligible; the state that replaces it is a Wigner-crystal-like CDW whose charge localization is enhanced by band mixing.
  • A displacement field can drive a weakly first-order transition between the $\nu=-2/3$ FCI and a CDW, matching the trivial state seen across the experimental displacement-tuned transition.
  • Direct spin exchange is the operative ferromagnetism mechanism at finite doping, and CDWs are weaker ferromagnets, which offers an explanation for the weak polarization observed at $\nu=-1/3$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: if direct exchange is the dominant ferromagnetism source, then lattice models with more localized Wannier functions or stronger nearest-neighbor exchange should show more robust FCIs at fixed screening; comparing twisted homobilayers with different orbital overlaps would test this.
  • Editorial extension: because band mixing and CDW onset are decoupled at $\nu=-2/3$, integrating out the upper band may yield a quantitatively reliable single-band model for that filling, with the transition captured by renormalized interactions rather than by mixing itself.
  • Editorial extension: the model treats $\epsilon$ and $d$ as independent, but in a real device the dielectric environment also renormalizes the Wannier orbitals; a self-consistent calculation that lets the orbitals respond to screening could shift the predicted phase boundaries.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper constructs a two-band interacting lattice model for twisted MoTe2 bilayers near 3.7 degrees, with hoppings and interaction matrix elements derived from Wannierized continuum/DFT bands at 3.89 degrees. Using infinite DMRG on YC5/YC6 cylinders, the authors compute ground-state phase diagrams at fillings ν = -1, -2/3, -3/5, and -1/3 as functions of dielectric constant, screening length, and displacement field, identifying integer and fractional Chern insulators, charge density waves, and spin-polarized Fermi liquids. They argue that direct spin-exchange interactions are essential for stabilizing the valley-polarized Chern ferromagnet, and that mixing with the second valence band destabilizes Chern insulators in favor of CDWs; they also report that the CDW-FCI transitions may be weakly first-order.

Significance. If the main claims hold, this is a valuable contribution to the tMoTe2 and fractional Chern insulator literature: it is one of the first DMRG studies of a two-band lattice model that accommodates competing CDWs, and it provides a controlled comparison (with and without J terms, Fig. 3) supporting the importance of direct exchange for ferromagnetism. The phase diagrams in Fig. 2 and the displacement-field-tuned transition in Fig. 2(c) give falsifiable predictions connected to recent experiments. The numerical work is careful on convergence (χ=4800, truncation error < 10^-5) and uses charge pumping and Hall conductance diagnostics for topological phase identification. The main weaknesses are that the band-mixing/CDW mechanism is supported only by correlational evidence, and that the claimed weakly first-order transitions are based on data the authors themselves describe as not fully reliable; these issues are addressable with additional calculations or appropriately softened claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Competing CDWs and Band Mixing; Fig. 4] The abstract lists 'mixing with higher bands' as key to destabilizing CIs/FCIs in favor of CDWs, but the evidence in this section is correlational. Figure 4 plots lower-band occupation and charge-order amplitude against the same tuning parameter 1/epsilon; at ν=-1/3 and ν=-1 the onset of charge order coincides with an increase in band mixing, while at ν=-2/3 and ν=-3/5 it does not. Because both observables vary monotonically with the same parameter, their coincidence does not establish that band mixing causes the CDW; stronger interactions could independently produce both Wigner-crystal formation and upper-band occupation. The Discussion elevates this to 'proper treatment of band mixing ... favors charge-ordered phases,' but no controlled calculation is shown in which the interband coupling is switched off (e.g., a single-band projection or an artificial reduction of hybridization) while all other parameters are held fixed. Such a test would settle the causal direction; without it, the band-mixing mechanism should be presented as a correlation rather than a demonstrated cause.
  2. [Nature of the CDW-FCI Transitions; Supplement Fig. S5] The paper concludes that the epsilon-tuned transitions at ν=-2/3 and ν=-3/5 'appear to be weakly first-order,' but the same paragraph states that the CDW correlation length of about 4 unit cells is large enough that DMRG may not be fully reliable, and that for ν=-2/3 the transition is closest to appearing continuous and cannot be reliably accessed due to finite-size effects. Supplement Fig. S5 further notes that the correlation length near the ν=-2/3 transition is not converged in χ and that the short correlation length is an artifact. The presented data therefore do not support a weakly-first-order classification at ν=-2/3, and the statements are internally inconsistent. The authors should either provide converged correlation-length data across the transition or explicitly label the transition order as undetermined in both the main text and the abstract.
  3. [Model, Eq. (1), Eq. (3); Abstract] The model is constructed from Wannier functions obtained from the continuum model fitted to DFT band structure at 3.89 degrees (Ref. [16]), yet the abstract and experimental comparisons refer to a twist angle of approximately 3.7 degrees. The paper does not justify that the Wannier orbitals, hoppings, and interaction matrix elements at 3.89 degrees remain accurate at 3.7 degrees, where the band structure and interaction parameters can vary. Since the phase diagrams in Fig. 2 are presented as describing tMoTe2 near 3.7 degrees, this transferability assumption should be explicitly justified, or the model should be reframed as a representative model with the angle dependence left to future work.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typos in the main text, including 'the that fine-tuned flatness' in the Introduction, 'preciseis' in the Model section, and 'Modificatons' in the same paragraph; these should be corrected in revision.
  2. [Supplement, interaction terms] The sentence 'However, Eq. (S11) is incorrect because the DFT band structure is derived for fully filled valence bands' is an editorial note left in the text; it should be integrated into the derivation as a proper explanation of why the assisted hopping term takes the form in Eq. (S12), rather than appearing as a retraction of an earlier equation.
  3. [Supplement Fig. S4] The caption describes charge-pumping panels for ν=-3/5, -2/3, and -1 with D=0 and for ν=-2/3 with D=5 meV, but the panels themselves are unlabeled; adding (a)-(d) labels and matching them in the caption would improve readability.
  4. [Supplement Fig. S2 and main text on ν=-2/3 FCI] The supplement states that in YC6 geometry the flux-2π state used for charge pumping at ν=-2/3 has slightly higher energy and is accessed as a metastable state; this caveat should be mentioned in the main text when the ν=-2/3 FCI phase is identified via charge pumping, since YC6 is the geometry used for this filling.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: model inputs are external DFT bands and scanned interaction parameters; the key mechanism claims are DMRG outputs tested by controlled comparisons.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained. The lattice Hamiltonian in Eq. (3) is constructed by Wannier projection of a continuum model fitted to the DFT band structure of Ref. [16]; that input is external first-principles data, not the paper's predicted phases. The dielectric constant epsilon and screening length d are scanned as adjustable parameters rather than fitted to the target FCI/CDW outcomes, so the phase diagrams in Fig. 2 are genuine outputs. The claim that direct spin exchange stabilizes ferromagnetism is tested by a controlled comparison in Fig. 3, where the exchange terms are either retained or deleted while other physics is held fixed, making the conclusion an output of the model rather than an input. The band-mixing/CDW claim is inferred from DMRG outputs and correlations in Fig. 4; even if that evidence is correlational rather than a controlled projection test, a robustness concern is not a circularity concern, and no equation defines CDW order in terms of band mixing or otherwise forces the predicted phase from the fitted parameters. The supplement's explicit correction of the assisted-hopping term (replacing Eq. S11 with Eq. S12) is a modeling adjustment, not a circular input. No load-bearing step reduces to a parameter fitted to the predicted quantity, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' own prior work to forbid alternatives. The self-citations that appear, including the DFT paper coauthored by one of the present authors, are externally grounded band-structure inputs or background methodology and do not carry the paper's conclusions.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a DFT-fitted lattice model with several adjustable parameters (ε, d, D) and truncation choices. No new particles or forces are introduced. The key assumptions are the validity of the two-band Wannierization and the reliability of cylinder DMRG as a proxy for the 2D limit.

free parameters (6)
  • Hopping amplitude t1 = -3.855 meV
    Fitted to DFT band structure of twisted MoTe2 at 3.89° via Wannierization; sets the kinetic energy scale in H0.
  • Hopping amplitude t2 = -0.977 - 1.633i meV
    Same DFT fit; encodes spin-orbit / valley coupling in the extended Kane-Mele model.
  • Hopping amplitude t3 = 0.914 meV
    Same DFT fit; included up to third nearest neighbors.
  • Dielectric constant epsilon = Scanned over ~5-21
    Treated as an adjustable parameter in Eq. (2); controls overall interaction strength and is varied to produce phase diagrams.
  • Screening length d = 66 Å and 102 Å
    Two experimentally feasible gate distances chosen; not fitted, but setting d changes the long-range interaction tail.
  • Sublattice potential D = Tuned up to ~65 meV
    Models displacement field effect on sublattice potential; drives the FCI-CDW transition at ν=-2/3.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The two low-energy bands per spin have opposite Chern numbers ±1 at the twist angles considered, so they can be represented by exponentially localized Wannier orbitals on a honeycomb lattice.
    Invoked in the Model section to justify the tight-binding truncation; based on DFT/continuum model results of Refs. [16,22].
  • domain assumption Spin-valley locking and approximate U(1) valley conservation, promoted to exact symmetry, so each band is twofold degenerate and spin is a good label.
    Used throughout the Hamiltonian and DMRG sectors; standard for MoTe2 but an approximation.
  • domain assumption The Wannierization scheme of Ref. [22] yields exponentially localized Wannier orbitals and accurate hopping and interaction parameters.
    Central to the model construction; the paper adopts this scheme without re-deriving it.
  • domain assumption The dual-gate screened Coulomb interaction with a single effective dielectric constant ε and screening length d captures the relevant interaction physics in the experiment.
    Eq. (2) and the supplement; ε is treated as adjustable, and the interaction is cut off at the 20th or 50th neighbor.
  • ad hoc to paper The Hilbert space truncation to two bands per spin and interactions to second-nearest neighbors (plus long-range Hartree) is sufficient; three- and four-site terms are negligible.
    Supplement: 'Terms that involve three or four sites have small enough amplitudes and thus are neglected in the modeling.' This truncation is a modeling choice that could affect phase boundaries.
  • domain assumption iDMRG on YC5/YC6 cylinders with bond dimension up to 4800 faithfully represents the 2D thermodynamic limit for the studied phases.
    Used to extract phase diagrams; the paper checks correlation lengths vs half-width but notes convergence issues near the ν=-2/3 transition.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fractional Chern Insulators and Competing States in a Twisted MoTe$_2$ Lattice Model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/A53BTLOK

@misc{pith2026250506354,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fractional Chern Insulators and Competing States in a Twisted MoTe$_2$ Lattice Model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/A53BTLOK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.06354}
}
abstract

We construct an interacting lattice model for twisted $\mathrm{MoTe}_{2}$ bilayers at a twist angle of approximately 3.7\degree. We use the infinite density matrix renormalization group (iDMRG) in a cylinder geometry to identify a variety of competing integer and fractional Chern insulators and charge density wave (CDW) states that emerge upon the spontaneous breaking of time reversal symmetry by valley polarization. We use finite-size analysis to establish the robustness of Chern insulating states even in geometries that admit competing CDWs, and explore the phase transitions between these states driven by increasing sublattice potential or interaction strength. Our work highlights the crucial role played by direct spin exchange in stabilizing the parent valley-polarized Chern ferromagnet band, and by the mixing with higher bands in destabilizing CIs/FCIs in favor of CDW orders.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.06354 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Band dispersion: Top two valence bands of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Phase diagrams inferred from YC6/YC5 geometry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The role of exchange interactions in stabilizing ferro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fractional Chern insulators in alternating twisted multilayer MoTe$_{2}$

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In alternating twisted multilayer MoTe2, layer sliding destroys the 1/3-filling fractional Chern insulator at fixed Chern number, with the transition tracked by the trace-condition measure of quantum geometry.

  2. Chiral Edge Excitations of $\nu=1/2$ Fractional Chern Insulators in the Bosonic Hofstadter Model

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Charge-one edge excitations of a ν=1/2 bosonic fractional Chern insulator on an infinite strip of width Ly=10 quantitatively match chiral Luttinger liquid spectral functions.

  3. Tunable phase transitions from semimetals to Chern insulators in two-dimensional quadratic-band-crossing materials

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    For quadratic-band-crossing semimetals, a static sigma-2 mass gives Chern number +-sgn(tx tz), while elliptically polarized light gives Chern number +-sgn(phi); the claimed linear-polarization trivial insulator is act...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [16]

    Wang, X.-W

    C. Wang, X.-W. Zhang, X. Liu, Y. He, X. Xu, Y. Ran, T. Cao, and D. Xiao, Fractional Chern Insulator in Twisted Bilayer MoTe 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 036501 (2024)

    2024

  2. [1]

    J. Cai, E. Anderson, C. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, Y. Zhang, F. Fan, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y. Ran, T. Cao, L. Fu, D. Xiao, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Signatures of fractional quantum anomalous Hall states in twisted MoTe 2, Nature 622, 63 (2023)

    2023

  3. [2]

    Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Kang, J. Zhu, P. Kn¨ uppel, C. Vaswani, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Thermodynamic evidence of fractional Chern insulator in moir´ e MoTe2, Nature622, 69 (2023)

    2023

  4. [3]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, X. Liu, C. Wang, W. Holtzmann, C. Hu, Z. Liu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J.-H. Chu, T. Cao, L. Fu, W. Yao, C.-Z. Chang, D. Cobden, D. Xiao, and X. Xu, Observation of fractionally quantized anomalous hall effect, Nature 622, 74 (2023)

    2023

  5. [4]

    F. Xu, Z. Sun, T. Jia, C. Liu, C. Xu, C. Li, Y. Gu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong, J. Jia, Z. Shi, S. Jiang, Y. Zhang, X. Liu, and T. Li, Observation of In- teger and Fractional Quantum Anomalous Hall Effects in Twisted Bilayer MoTe2, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031037 (2023)

    2023

  6. [5]

    Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao, A. P. Reddy, J. Yang, J. Seo, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and L. Ju, Fractional quantum anomalous hall effect in multilayer graphene, Nature 626, 759 (2024)

    2024

  7. [6]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a Quantum Hall Effect with- out Landau Levels: Condensed-Matter Realization of the ”Parity Anomaly”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988)

    1988

  8. [7]

    Chang, J

    C.-Z. Chang, J. Zhang, X. Feng, J. Shen, Z. Zhang, M. Guo, K. Li, Y. Ou, P. Wei, L.-L. Wang, Z.-Q. Ji, Y. Feng, S. Ji, X. Chen, J. Jia, X. Dai, Z. Fang, S.-C. Zhang, K. He, Y. Wang, L. Lu, X.-C. Ma, and Q.-K. Xue, Experimental observation of the quantum anomalous hall effect in a magnetic topological insulator, Science 340, 167 (2013)

    2013

Show all 65 references
  1. [8]

    Sheng, Z.-C

    D. Sheng, Z.-C. Gu, K. Sun, and L. Sheng, Fractional quantum Hall effect in the absence of Landau levels, Nat. Commun. 2, 389 (2011)

    2011

  2. [9]

    Neupert, L

    T. Neupert, L. Santos, C. Chamon, and C. Mudry, Frac- tional Quantum Hall States at Zero Magnetic Field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 236804 (2011)

    2011

  3. [10]

    Regnault and B

    N. Regnault and B. A. Bernevig, Fractional Chern Insu- lator, Phys. Rev. X 1, 021014 (2011)

    2011

  4. [11]

    K. Sun, Z. Gu, H. Katsura, and S. Das Sarma, Nearly Flatbands with Nontrivial Topology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 236803 (2011)

    2011

  5. [12]

    Tang, J.-W

    E. Tang, J.-W. Mei, and X.-G. Wen, High-Temperature Fractional Quantum Hall States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 236802 (2011)

    2011

  6. [13]

    D. Xiao, W. Zhu, Y. Ran, N. Nagaosa, and S. Okamoto, Interface engineering of quantum Hall effects in digital transition metal oxide heterostructures, Nature Commu- nications 2, 596 (2011)

    2011

  7. [14]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, X.-W. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, W. Li, C. Wang, C. Hu, Y. Zhao, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Yang, D. Cobden, J.- h. Chu, N. Regnault, B. A. Bernevig, L. Fu, T. Cao, D. Xiao, and X. Xu, Ferromagnetism and topology of the higher flat band in a ...

    2025 doi

  8. [15]

    F. Xu, X. Chang, J. Xiao, Y. Zhang, F. Liu, Z. Sun, N. Mao, N. Peshcherenko, J. Li, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong, L. Lu, J. Jia, D. Qian, Z. Shi, Y. Zhang, X. Liu, S. Jiang, and T. Li, Interplay between topology and correlations in the second moir´ e band of twisted bila...

    2025

  9. [17]

    Y. Jia, J. Yu, J. Liu, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, Z. Qi, H. Pi, N. Regnault, H. Weng, B. A. Bernevig, and Q. Wu, Moir´ e fractional Chern insulators. I. First-principles calcula- tions and continuum models of twisted bilayer MoTe 2, Phys. Rev. B 109, 205121 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Z. Ji, H. Park, M. E. Barber, C. Hu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J.-H. Chu, X. Xu, and Z.-X. Shen, Lo- cal probe of bulk and edge states in a fractional chern insulator, Nature 635, 578 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    F. Xu, Z. Sun, J. Li, C. Zheng, C. Xu, J. Gao, T. Jia, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong, et al., Signa- tures of unconventional superconductivity near reentrant and fractional quantum anomalous Hall insulators, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.06972 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  12. [20]

    F. Wu, T. Lovorn, E. Tutuc, I. Martin, and A. H. MacDonald, Topological Insulators in Twisted Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Homobilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 086402 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    H. Yu, M. Chen, and W. Yao, Giant magnetic field from moir´ e induced Berry phase in homobilayer semiconduc- tors, Natl. Sci. Rev. 7, 12 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Devakul, V

    T. Devakul, V. Cr´ epel, Y. Zhang, and L. Fu, Magic in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide bilayers, Nature Communications 12, 6730 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    W.-X. Qiu, B. Li, X.-J. Luo, and F. Wu, Interaction- Driven Topological Phase Diagram of Twisted Bilayer MoTe2, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041026 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Z2 Topological Order and the Quantum Spin Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 146802 (2005)

    2005

  17. [25]

    S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 2863 (1992)

    1992

  18. [26]

    I. P. McCulloch, Infinite size density matrix renormal- ization group, revisited (2008), arXiv:0804.2509 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2008 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Hauschild and F

    J. Hauschild and F. Pollmann, Efficient numerical sim- ulations with Tensor Networks: Tensor Network Python (TeNPy), SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 5 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    J. A. Kj¨ all, M. P. Zaletel, R. S. K. Mong, J. H. Bardar- son, and F. Pollmann, Phase diagram of the anisotropic spin-2 XXZ model: Infinite-system density matrix renor- malization group study, Phys. Rev. B 87, 235106 (2013)

    2013

  21. [29]

    H. Li, U. Kumar, K. Sun, and S.-Z. Lin, Spontaneous fractional Chern insulators in transition metal dichalco- genide moir´ e superlattices, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, L032070 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    Cr´ epel and L

    V. Cr´ epel and L. Fu, Anomalous Hall metal and fractional Chern insulator in twisted transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B 107, L201109 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    J. Yu, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, M. Wang, O. Vafek, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Fractional Chern insula- tors versus nonmagnetic states in twisted bilayer MoTe2, Phys. Rev. B 109, 045147 (2024). 7

    2024

  24. [32]

    Abouelkomsan, A

    A. Abouelkomsan, A. P. Reddy, L. Fu, and E. J. Bergholtz, Band mixing in the quantum anomalous Hall regime of twisted semiconductor bilayers, Phys. Rev. B 109, L121107 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    Morales-Dur´ an, J

    N. Morales-Dur´ an, J. Wang, G. R. Schleder, M. Angeli, Z. Zhu, E. Kaxiras, C. Repellin, and J. Cano, Pressure- enhanced fractional Chern insulators along a magic line in moir´ e transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L032022 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Abouelkomsan, E

    A. Abouelkomsan, E. J. Bergholtz, and S. Chatterjee, Multiferroicity and topology in twisted transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 026801 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    A. P. Reddy, F. Alsallom, Y. Zhang, T. Devakul, and L. Fu, Fractional quantum anomalous hall states in twisted bilayer mote 2 and wse 2, Phys. Rev. B 108, 085117 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    Goldman, A

    H. Goldman, A. P. Reddy, N. Paul, and L. Fu, Zero- Field Composite Fermi Liquid in Twisted Semiconductor Bilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 136501 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    J. Dong, J. Wang, P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Composite Fermi Liquid at Zero Magnetic Field in Twisted MoTe 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 136502 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    C. Xu, J. Li, Y. Xu, Z. Bi, and Y. Zhang, Maximally lo- calized Wannier functions, interaction models, and frac- tional quantum anomalous Hall effect in twisted bilayer MoTe2, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121, e2316749121 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Zhang, C

    X.-W. Zhang, C. Wang, X. Liu, Y. Fan, T. Cao, and D. Xiao, Polarization-driven band topology evolution in twisted MoTe2 and WSe2, Nature Communications 15, 4223 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    K. Kang, B. Shen, Y. Qiu, Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Evidence of the fractional quantum spin Hall effect in moir´ e MoTe2, Nature 628, 522 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    B. A. Foutty, C. R. Kometter, T. Devakul, A. P. Reddy, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and B. E. Feldman, Mapping twist-tuned multiband topology in bilayer wse2, Science 384, 343 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Y. Xia, Z. Han, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Unconventional superconductivity in twisted bilayer wse2 (2024), arXiv:2405.14784

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Kn¨ uppel, J

    P. Kn¨ uppel, J. Zhu, Y. Xia, Z. Xia, Z. Han, Y. Zeng, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Correlated states controlled by tunable van hove singu- larity in moir´ e wse2 (2024), arXiv:2406.03315

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    See Supplemental Material

  37. [45]

    Marzari and D

    N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized gen- eralized Wannier functions for composite energy bands, Phys. Rev. B 56, 12847 (1997)

    1997

  38. [46]

    Kruchkov, Quantum geometry, flat Chern bands, and Wannier orbital quantization, Phys

    A. Kruchkov, Quantum geometry, flat Chern bands, and Wannier orbital quantization, Phys. Rev. B105, L241102 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    S. Yan, D. A. Huse, and S. R. White, Spin-liquid ground state of the s = 1/2 kagome heisenberg antiferromagnet, Science 332, 1173 (2011)

    2011

  40. [48]

    M. P. Zaletel, R. S. K. Mong, F. Pollmann, and E. H. Rezayi, Infinite density matrix renormalization group for multicomponent quantum Hall systems, Phys. Rev. B91, 045115 (2015)

    2015

  41. [49]

    S. A. Parameswaran, R. Roy, and S. L. Sondhi, Fractional quantum Hall physics in topological flat bands, C. R. Phys. 14, 816 (2013)

    2013

  42. [50]

    Kourtis, T

    S. Kourtis, T. Neupert, C. Chamon, and C. Mudry, Frac- tional chern insulators with strong interactions that far exceed band gaps, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 126806 (2014)

    2014

  43. [51]

    A. G. Grushin, J. Motruk, M. P. Zaletel, and F. Poll- mann, Characterization and stability of a fermionic ν = 1/3 fractional chern insulator, Phys. Rev. B 91, 035136 (2015)

    2015

  44. [52]

    H. Park, W. Li, C. Hu, C. Beach, M. Gon¸ calves, J. F. Mendez-Valderrama, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, D. Cobden, L. Fu, B. A. Bernevig, N. Regnault, J.-H. Chu, D. Xiao, and X. Xu, Observation of High-Temperature Dissipationless Fractional Chern Insulator (2...

    2025 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Y. Wang, J. Choe, E. Anderson, W. Li, J. Ingham, E. A. Arsenault, Y. Li, X. Hu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, X. Roy, D. Basov, D. Xiao, R. Queiroz, J. C. Hone, X. Xu, and X.-Y. Zhu, Hidden states and dynamics of fractional fillings in twisted mote2 bilayers, Nature 10.1038/s4158...

    2025 doi

  46. [54]

    Y. H. Kwan, G. Wagner, J. Yu, A. K. Dagnino, Y. Jiang, X. Xu, B. A. Bernevig, T. Neupert, and N. Regnault, When Could Abelian Fractional Topological Insulators Exist in Twisted MoTe 2 (and Other Systems) (2024), arXiv:2407.02560 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    J. Wang, J. Cano, A. J. Millis, Z. Liu, and B. Yang, Exact Landau Level Description of Geometry and Interaction in a Flatband, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 246403 (2021)

    2021

  48. [56]

    Abouelkomsan, K

    A. Abouelkomsan, K. Yang, and E. J. Bergholtz, Quan- tum metric induced phases in Moir´ e materials, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L012015 (2023)

    2023

  49. [57]

    Kaushal, N

    N. Kaushal, N. Morales-Dur´ an, A. H. MacDonald, and E. Dagotto, Magnetic ground states of honeycomb lattice Wigner crystals, Communications Physics 5, 289 (2022)

    2022

  50. [58]

    S. A. Parameswaran, R. Roy, and S. L. Sondhi, Fractional Chern insulators and the W∞ algebra, Phys. Rev. B 85, 241308 (2012)

    2012

  51. [59]

    Roy, Band geometry of fractional topological insula- tors, Phys

    R. Roy, Band geometry of fractional topological insula- tors, Phys. Rev. B 90, 165139 (2014)

    2014

  52. [60]

    P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Vor- texability: A unifying criterion for ideal fractional Chern insulators, Phys. Rev. B 108, 205144 (2023)

    2023

  53. [61]

    Varjas, A

    D. Varjas, A. Abouelkomsan, K. Yang, and E. J. Bergholtz, Topological lattice models with constant Berry curvature, SciPost Phys. 12, 118 (2022)

    2022

  54. [62]

    A. M. L¨ auchli, Z. Liu, E. J. Bergholtz, and R. Moessner, Hierarchy of Fractional Chern Insulators and Compet- ing Compressible States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 126802 (2013)

    2013

  55. [63]

    Morales-Dur´ an, N

    N. Morales-Dur´ an, N. Wei, J. Shi, and A. H. MacDon- ald, Magic Angles and Fractional Chern Insulators in Twisted Homobilayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 096602 (2024)

    2024

  56. [64]

    Li and F

    B. Li and F. Wu, Variational mapping of Chern bands to Landau levels: Application to fractional Chern insulators in twisted MoTe2, Phys. Rev. B 111, 125122 (2025)

    2025

  57. [65]

    Wang and S

    Z. Wang and S. H. Simon, Closed Band-Projected Density Algebra Must Be Girvin-MacDonald-Platzman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 136502 (2025). 8 SUPPLEMENT AL MA TERIAL Parameters of the Hamiltonian We summarize the parameters that we use for screening lengthd = 102˚A in Tab. S1 and F...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.