Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

PCS-UQ: Uncertainty Quantification via the Predictability-Computability-Stability Framework

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.08784 v3 pith:CWI54XHA submitted 2025-05-13 stat.ML cs.LGmath.STstat.MEstat.TH

PCS-UQ: Uncertainty Quantification via the Predictability-Computability-Stability Framework

classification stat.ML cs.LGmath.STstat.MEstat.TH
keywords pcs-uqconformalcoveragealgorithmsframeworkpredictionconsistentdatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

As machine learning (ML) enters high-stakes domains, trustworthy uncertainty quantification (UQ) is essential for safety. In this paper we introduce PCS-UQ, a framework based on the Predictability, Computability, and Stability (PCS) principles for veridical data science. Starting with a candidate set of models or algorithms, PCS-UQ integrates a rigorous prediction-check to screen out unsuitable models in the set and utilizes bootstrap samples in order to capture both inter-sample variability and algorithmic instability for the prediction-checked algorithms. We then introduce a novel multiplicative calibration scheme to enhance local adaptivity, which can be viewed as a new score in conformal prediction. Moreover, we produce a compilation of 17 real-world regression datasets with manually constructed subgroups. On this benchmark, PCS-UQ maintains the target coverage while outperforming or matching conformal methods equipped with oracle-selected algorithms in interval width. PCS-UQ achieves consistent subgroup coverage, outperforming these oracle-selected conformal methods. Notably, PCS-UQ stands out in achieving both competitive interval widths and consistent subgroup coverage. Across 6 classification datasets, PCS-UQ reduces prediction set sizes by 20\%. To scale the framework for deep learning, we propose computationally efficient variants that bypass expensive retraining. On three computer vision benchmarks, these variants reduce prediction set sizes by 20\% over conformal baselines. Finally, we provide a theoretical proof that a modified PCS-UQ algorithm preserves valid coverage under exchangeability as a form of split conformal inference.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Conformalized Percentile Interval: Finite Sample Validity and Improved Conditional Performance

    stat.ML 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A PIT-calibrated percentile interval method delivers finite-sample marginal coverage, asymptotic conditional coverage, and shorter intervals than prior conformal approaches.

  2. Confidence Intervals for Rate Estimation with Importance Sampling in Autonomous Vehicle Evaluation

    stat.ME 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A new exponential bootstrap method constructs monotonicity-compliant confidence intervals for rate estimates under compound Poisson models and importance sampling in autonomous vehicle evaluation.

  3. Testing for LLM response differences: the case of a composite null consisting of semantically irrelevant query perturbations

    math.ST 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    A new hypothesis test for binary LLM responses treats semantically equivalent query perturbations as an unknown null set and gives asymptotic validity and consistency guarantees under a uniformity assumption.