Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

TARGET: Benchmarking Table Retrieval for Generative Tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.11545 v1 pith:SXIOVZFJ submitted 2025-05-14 cs.IR cs.AIcs.CLcs.DB

TARGET: Benchmarking Table Retrieval for Generative Tasks

classification cs.IR cs.AIcs.CLcs.DB
keywords dataretrievaltabletargettasksgenerativeretrieversstructured
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The data landscape is rich with structured data, often of high value to organizations, driving important applications in data analysis and machine learning. Recent progress in representation learning and generative models for such data has led to the development of natural language interfaces to structured data, including those leveraging text-to-SQL. Contextualizing interactions, either through conversational interfaces or agentic components, in structured data through retrieval-augmented generation can provide substantial benefits in the form of freshness, accuracy, and comprehensiveness of answers. The key question is: how do we retrieve the right table(s) for the analytical query or task at hand? To this end, we introduce TARGET: a benchmark for evaluating TAble Retrieval for GEnerative Tasks. With TARGET we analyze the retrieval performance of different retrievers in isolation, as well as their impact on downstream tasks. We find that dense embedding-based retrievers far outperform a BM25 baseline which is less effective than it is for retrieval over unstructured text. We also surface the sensitivity of retrievers across various metadata (e.g., missing table titles), and demonstrate a stark variation of retrieval performance across datasets and tasks. TARGET is available at https://target-benchmark.github.io.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. FollowTable: A Benchmark for Instruction-Following Table Retrieval

    cs.IR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    FollowTable is the first large-scale benchmark for instruction-following table retrieval, paired with an Instruction Responsiveness Score, showing that existing models fail to adapt to fine-grained constraints beyond ...

  2. PIPER: Content-Based Table Search via profiling and LLM-Generated Pseudoqueries

    cs.IR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PIPER retrieves and ranks tabular datasets by profiling their content and using LLM-generated queries for dense vector search, outperforming metadata baselines and TableQA methods in low-metadata settings.

  3. Towards Platonic Representation for Table Reasoning: A Foundation for Permutation-Invariant Retrieval

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Table representations must be permutation-invariant to preserve semantic structure, and a new header-aligned encoder moves toward this ideal while exposing fragility in existing LLM table embeddings.