Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Learn to Reason Efficiently with Adaptive Length-based Reward Shaping

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.15612 v1 pith:JAQK2NIJ submitted 2025-05-21 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords reasoningrewardefficiencylaserlength-basedshapingadaptiveapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in solving complex problems through reinforcement learning (RL), particularly by generating long reasoning traces. However, these extended outputs often exhibit substantial redundancy, which limits the efficiency of LRMs. In this paper, we investigate RL-based approaches to promote reasoning efficiency. Specifically, we first present a unified framework that formulates various efficient reasoning methods through the lens of length-based reward shaping. Building on this perspective, we propose a novel Length-bAsed StEp Reward shaping method (LASER), which employs a step function as the reward, controlled by a target length. LASER surpasses previous methods, achieving a superior Pareto-optimal balance between performance and efficiency. Next, we further extend LASER based on two key intuitions: (1) The reasoning behavior of the model evolves during training, necessitating reward specifications that are also adaptive and dynamic; (2) Rather than uniformly encouraging shorter or longer chains of thought (CoT), we posit that length-based reward shaping should be difficulty-aware i.e., it should penalize lengthy CoTs more for easy queries. This approach is expected to facilitate a combination of fast and slow thinking, leading to a better overall tradeoff. The resulting method is termed LASER-D (Dynamic and Difficulty-aware). Experiments on DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B, DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B, and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B show that our approach significantly enhances both reasoning performance and response length efficiency. For instance, LASER-D and its variant achieve a +6.1 improvement on AIME2024 while reducing token usage by 63%. Further analysis reveals our RL-based compression produces more concise reasoning patterns with less redundant "self-reflections". Resources are at https://github.com/hkust-nlp/Laser.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Reconsidering Overthinking: Penalizing Internal and External Redundancy in CoT Reasoning

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A dual-penalty RL method that compresses chain-of-thought traces by separately penalizing internal semantic stagnation and external post-answer continuation reduces reasoning length by about 40% while preserving accur...

  2. Garbage In, Reasoning Out? Why Benchmark Scores are Unreliable and What to Do About It

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A systematic human audit of SocialIQa, FauxPas-EAI and ToMi shows that benchmark scores are inflated or distorted by data flaws, rigid scoring, and sensitivity to phrasing.

  3. Numerically Optimizing Shortcuts to Adiabaticity: A Hybrid Control Strategy

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Combining analytical shortcuts to adiabaticity with numerical optimization yields up to 1000× better two-ion separation protocols without extra experimental cost.

Pith tools