Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

Backdoor Cleaning without External Guidance in MLLM Fine-tuning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.16916 v1 pith:27IY2IBY submitted 2025-05-22 cs.CR cs.CV

classification cs.CRcs.CV
keywords attentionbackdoormllmsmodelsdatasetsentropyfine-tuningmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly deployed in fine-tuning-as-a-service (FTaaS) settings, where user-submitted datasets adapt general-purpose models to downstream tasks. This flexibility, however, introduces serious security risks, as malicious fine-tuning can implant backdoors into MLLMs with minimal effort. In this paper, we observe that backdoor triggers systematically disrupt cross-modal processing by causing abnormal attention concentration on non-semantic regions--a phenomenon we term attention collapse. Based on this insight, we propose Believe Your Eyes (BYE), a data filtering framework that leverages attention entropy patterns as self-supervised signals to identify and filter backdoor samples. BYE operates via a three-stage pipeline: (1) extracting attention maps using the fine-tuned model, (2) computing entropy scores and profiling sensitive layers via bimodal separation, and (3) performing unsupervised clustering to remove suspicious samples. Unlike prior defenses, BYE equires no clean supervision, auxiliary labels, or model modifications. Extensive experiments across various datasets, models, and diverse trigger types validate BYE's effectiveness: it achieves near-zero attack success rates while maintaining clean-task performance, offering a robust and generalizable solution against backdoor threats in MLLMs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. EMO-R3: Reflective Reinforcement Learning for Emotional Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    EMO-R3, which combines a three-step emotional reasoning prompt with a reward for the model agreeing with its own image–emotion judgments, raises visual emotion-recognition accuracy by about one point over plain GRPO.

  2. Uncertainty-Aware Abstention in Large Language Models with Provable Alignment Guarantees

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    CIC selects the largest uncertainty threshold whose Hoeffding or Clopper–Pearson upper bound on acceptance-conditioned error stays ≤ α, guaranteeing finite-sample risk control under exchangeability.

  3. TECP: Token-Entropy Conformal Prediction for LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    TECP applies split conformal prediction with token-entropy nonconformity scores to LLM question answering and reports reliable coverage, but its implementation requires the token probabilities it claims to avoid.

  4. FADE: Adversarial Concept Erasure in Flow Models

    cs.CV 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    FADE combines adversarial training with trajectory preservation to erase concepts from diffusion models, reporting state-of-the-art erasure on Stable Diffusion benchmarks, but the evidence is incomplete and the theore...

  5. Conformal Sets in Multiple-Choice Question Answering under Black-Box Settings with Provable Coverage Guarantees

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Repeatedly sampling an LLM and using the entropy of answer frequencies yields conformal prediction sets for multiple-choice questions with empirical miscoverage near the target, and AUROC comparable to logit-based scores.

  6. Conformal P-Value in Multiple-Choice Question Answering Tasks with Provable Risk Control

    cs.CL 2025-08 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A p-value reformulation of split conformal prediction for LLM multiple-choice QA achieves nominal miscoverage control on MMLU and MMLU-Pro.

Pith tools