Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Bound States of the Schwarzschild Black Hole

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper computes, for the first time, the bound states of a Schwarzschild black hole's inverted potential and finds that high-overtone states become exponentially loosely bound and delocalized, explaining why quasinormal-mode overtones…

desk verdict A solid first computation of the inverted Regge-Wheeler bound states with a clean exponential-spacing law, but the advertised QNM-overtone conclusion rests on an unvalidated formal mapping. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.17186 v2 pith:5RQH3DUG submitted 2025-05-22 gr-qc hep-th

Sebastian H. Völkel This is my paper
classification gr-qchep-th
keywords quasinormalmodesboundstatesRegge-WheelerpotentialSchwarzschildblackholespectralstabilityinverted-potentialcorrespondenceringdownlong-rangesensitivity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks what the inverted-potential bound states of a Schwarzschild black hole look like, and what they imply for the better-known quasinormal-mode (QNM) spectrum. Solving the bound-state problem numerically for the Regge-Wheeler potential, it finds that energy levels approach zero exponentially fast ($E_n \sim -\exp(-Kn)$) and that the corresponding eigenfunctions delocalize rapidly, reaching far beyond the photon sphere. Because of the correspondence between QNMs and bound states of the inverted barrier, this explains why high QNM overtones are extremely sensitive to long-range modifications of the effective potential. The paper also shows that these bound states give a complementary picture of spectral stability: states below a perturbation's energy scale are robust, while those above receive a roughly constant relative shift.

What carries the argument

The central object is the inverted Regge-Wheeler potential — the potential well obtained by flipping the potential barrier that governs axial metric perturbations of a Schwarzschild black hole — whose Schrödinger-like equation is solved for eigenvalues $E_n$ and eigenfunctions $\psi_n$. Bound-state energies and eigenfunctions are obtained by direct numerical integration and a Wronskian root-finding condition. The argument is carried by the paper's reliance on the formal correspondence between QNM frequencies and bound-state levels of the inverted potential (introduced in the literature as Ref. [22] in the paper), together with the asymptotic property that the level spacing $E_{n+1}/E_n \to e^{-K}$ is set by the $\ell(\ell+1)/x^2$ tail of the well.

What would settle it

Directly compute high-overtone QNM frequencies of the Schwarzschild potential with a method independent of the bound-state mapping (e.g., continued fractions or time-domain evolution), add a small long-range perturbation such as a fractional change in the $\ell(\ell+1)/r^2$ tail, and check whether the high overtones shift as dramatically as the exponential bound-state sensitivity predicts; alternatively, verify numerically that $E_{n+1}/E_n \to e^{-K}$ with $K=2\pi(\ell(\ell+1))^{-1/4}$ for the bound states at large $n$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the bound states of the inverted Regge-Wheeler potential — the potential well obtained by flipping the barrier that governs Schwarzschild metric perturbations — are not hydrogen-like at all. Instead of $E_n \sim -1/n^2$, the energy levels for large $n$ follow an exponential law $E_n \sim -\exp(-Kn)$ with $K = 2\pi(\ell(\ell+1))^{-1/4}$, so successive levels approach zero with constant log-spacing. The eigenfunctions become correspondingly delocalized: the oscillatory part of $\psi_n$ extends to radii $x \sim (\ell(\ell+1)/(-E_n))^{1/2}$, exponentially far from the potential minimum. Under the inverted-potential correspondence used in the paper, these states correspond to QNM overtones, so the paper concludes that even moderate overtones effectively probe the asymptotic potential far from the photon sphere and are therefore extremely sensitive to long-range perturbations. In the perturbed-potential study, low-lying states are nearly unchanged while states above the perturbation scale acquire a roughly constant relative shift, matching the known fragility of QNM overtones.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's conclusions about quasinormal-mode overtones depend on the assumption that the correspondence between QNMs and bound states of the inverted potential is exact enough for all overtone numbers of the full Regge-Wheeler potential, an assumption the paper adopts formally and does not prove.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • High-overtone QNMs of Schwarzschild should be extremely sensitive to any modification of the long-range part of the effective potential, not just changes near the horizon.
  • The common picture of overtones as excitations localized near the photon sphere is called into question for all but the lowest few overtones.
  • Because bound-state turning points are real, spectral-stability properties of QNMs can be studied by straightforward integration, sidestepping the numerical fragility of direct QNM solvers.
  • For higher multipoles $\ell$, the potential well is deeper and delocalization sets in at larger $n$, so the photon-sphere interpretation remains valid for a larger set of modes as $\ell$ grows.
  • The exponential accumulation of bound-state levels at zero energy (the 'almost continuum' noted in the paper) suggests that the QNM overtone spectrum has an asymptotic, rather than ordinary, spectral character.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the exponential sensitivity carries over to astrophysical black holes, attempts to extract high overtones from ringdown waveforms may face a fundamental limitation: the modes are set by the asymptotic potential, which surrounding matter can easily modify.
  • The bound-state picture suggests a practical diagnostic: measuring the ratios of successive overtone frequencies could constrain long-range deviations from general relativity more directly than fundamental-mode measurements alone.
  • The same delocalization likely applies to bound states of the Kerr potential, implying that high overtones of spinning black holes also sample the far region; this is not proved in the paper and would need a separate study.
  • The exponential spacing hinted to connect to Price-tail decay (the paper leaves this open) could be made precise, since both are controlled by the $1/r^2$ tail; quantifying that link would give a new handle on late-time gravitational-wave signals.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper computes, for the first time, the bound-state eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the inverted Regge-Wheeler potential of the Schwarzschild black hole, for l=2,3,4. Numerically, the energies are found to approach zero exponentially fast, En ~ -exp(-Kn), with an asymptotic spacing compared to Eq. (7) obtained from a truncated inverse-square potential. The paper also studies the effect of a Pöschl-Teller bump perturbation and finds that low-lying bound states are essentially unaffected while higher states acquire a roughly constant relative shift. On this basis, and invoking Mashhoon's formal mapping between bound states and quasinormal modes, the paper argues that QNM overtones should be extremely sensitive to long-range modifications of the potential and discusses implications for spectral stability.

Significance. If the results are correct, this is a useful first quantitative study of the bound-state picture of the Schwarzschild problem. The exponential level spacing and the rapid delocalization of high-n eigenfunctions are concrete, checkable properties that could illuminate why QNM overtones are spectrally unstable, and the paper provides tabulated data with a DOI rather than only plots. The work contains no parameter fitting to a target spectrum: Eq. (7) is an external benchmark, and the perturbation parameters are hand-chosen. The main significance, however, is conditional: the advertised link to QNM overtones rests on Mashhoon's correspondence, which the paper explicitly does not implement or validate. The bound-state results themselves are independently valuable and reproducible, but the central physical interpretation needs either validation of the mapping or an explicitly conjectural framing.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods, Eq. (3); Conclusions] The paper's central interpretive claim—that QNM overtones are extremely sensitive to long-range potential modifications—is inferred from bound states through Mashhoon's mapping, but the mapping is never carried out or validated for the Regge-Wheeler potential. The Methods text states 'Instead of explicitly carrying out the mapping, we only rely on the formal aspect that QNMs and bound states can be mapped to each other,' and Eq. (3) involves a nontrivial parameter redefinition P' = pi(P). The cited Ref. [29] is said to discuss 'formal limitations' without those limitations being stated or resolved. Consequently, the statement in the Conclusions that 'based on Mashhoon's mapping one would thus expect...' is an unsupported extrapolation rather than a derived property of Schwarzschild QNMs; the bound states at a given l need not correspond to QNMs at the same l or with the same overtone index. Please either implement the mapping for a concrete potential, including the tortoise-coordinate tail, or explicitly reformulate the overtone-sensitivity statements as a conjecture whose verification is left to future work.
  2. [Results, Eq. (7), Fig. 5, and footnote 3] The asymptotic spacing formula (7) is derived for a truncated inverse-square potential, not for the full Regge-Wheeler potential. The footnote correctly warns that only the logarithmic separation is independent of the truncation, but no derivation is given that the Regge-Wheeler tail has exactly this K. The numerical evidence in Fig. 5 covers only n <= 9, and Fig. 6 shows convergence of |K - K_n| without a stated tolerance. Since En ~ -exp(-Kn) is one of the paper's headline results, the equality of the asymptotic spacing should be demonstrated either by a WKB or Bessel treatment of the actual tortoise-coordinate tail, or by a more explicit numerical convergence study with error estimates for K_n.
  3. [Methods, Eq. (4); Table I] The manuscript reports ten bound states spanning roughly ten orders of magnitude but gives no numerical error estimate, step-size control, or convergence test for the Wronskian root-finding. This is not merely a presentation issue: the perturbation analysis compares absolute differences as small as 10^-9 with shifts at the 10^-4 level, and the claim that the perturbed spacing approaches the same constant relies on the last few tabulated digits. Please state the estimated uncertainty per eigenvalue, for example from varying the integration domain, grid resolution, and root-finding tolerance, or provide convergence data in the supplementary material.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Results, after Eq. (6)] The sentence 'the bound-state energies in a potential are determined from integrating a E - V(x) between the two classical turning points' contains a stray 'a'; it should read 'integrating sqrt(E - V(x))'.
  2. [Figure 2 caption] The horizontal lines are said to start and end at the classical turning points of the unperturbed Regge-Wheeler potential; for the perturbed eigenfunctions the turning points differ, so the caption should specify that the turning points refer to the unperturbed potential only.
  3. [References, Ref. [34]] The reference 'From Boundary Data to Bound States' is missing the year; the entry should read 'JHEP 01 (2020) 072'.
  4. [Abstract and Conclusions] The phrase 'eigenfunctions corresponding to quasinormal mode overtones' overstates the status of the mapping; in the abstract it should be qualified as 'bound states corresponding via Mashhoon's formal mapping'.
  5. [Figure 5] The vertical axis is labeled ln(|En|) - ln(|En+1|), which is the same as the K_n defined in the text, but the label K_n is not used in the figure; adding it would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation: bound states are computed directly, Eq. (7) is an external Bessel-function benchmark, and self-citation to [26] is only for numerical method.

full rationale

The central numerical results are self-contained: the bound states of the inverted Regge-Wheeler potential are obtained by direct integration and Wronskian root-finding, not by fitting any quantity to quarkonium or black-hole QNM data. The asymptotic spacing formula Eq. (7) is taken from external Bessel-function analyses [55,56] and is used as a benchmark for comparison, not as an input fitted to the computed eigenvalues. The perturbation parameters (δV0, a, x0) are hand-chosen illustrative values, not optimized to reproduce any target spectrum. The only self-citation is Ref. [26], which is cited for the numerical stability and implementation of the bound-state method; it is not load-bearing for the paper's conclusions. The paper's QNM-overtone sensitivity claim relies on Mashhoon's mapping, which the authors explicitly invoke only formally and cite Ref. [29] for limitations; this is a limitation of external validity or an unsupported inference, but it is not circularity because the bound-state results do not reduce to the mapping or to any fitted input. Accordingly, no specific circular step can be exhibited, and the appropriate score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central numerical claim relies mainly on standard quantum mechanics and the numerical method; the interpretive claim about QNMs relies on Mashhoon's mapping, which is assumed. The analytic spacing constant relies on the truncated inverse-square potential equivalence, an ad hoc approximation supported only by numerical convergence. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Pöschl-Teller bump parameters (deltaV0, a, x0) = 0.01, 0.3, 40M
    Illustrative perturbation parameters chosen by hand for the spectral stability demonstration; the quantitative shifts in Table I depend on them, though the qualitative conclusions do not.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Regge-Wheeler master equation can be written as a time-independent Schrödinger equation in the tortoise coordinate, and the inverted potential supports bound states with standard decaying boundary conditions.
    Standard reduction of metric perturbations; used throughout the Letter.
  • domain assumption Mashhoon's mapping between QNM frequencies and bound-state energies of the inverted potential is applicable to the full Regge-Wheeler potential.
    Methods section states the paper relies on the formal aspect of the mapping, citing Refs. [22-26]; Ref. [29] notes formal limitations that are not addressed.
  • ad hoc to paper The asymptotic bound-state spacing of the full inverted Regge-Wheeler potential equals that of the truncated inverse-square potential, Eq. (7).
    Footnote 3: derived from Bessel results in Refs. [55,56] for the truncated l(l+1)/x^2 potential; the independence of the log-spacing from the truncation is assumed to carry over to the Regge-Wheeler potential in tortoise coordinates.
  • domain assumption Numerical shooting and Wronskian root finding yield converged eigenvalues to the reported precision.
    No convergence study or error bars are reported in the Letter.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bound States of the Schwarzschild Black Hole." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5RQH3DUG

@misc{pith2026250517186,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bound States of the Schwarzschild Black Hole},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5RQH3DUG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.17186}
}
read the original abstract

Understanding the physical significance and spectral stability of black hole quasinormal modes is fundamental to high-precision spectroscopy with future gravitational wave detectors. Inspired by Mashhoon's idea of relating quasinormal modes of black holes with their equivalent bound states in an inverted potential, we investigate, for the first time, energy levels and eigenfunctions of the Schwarzschild black hole quantitatively. While quasinormal modes describe the characteristic damped oscillations of a black hole, the bound states of the inverted potential are qualitatively more similar to those of the hydrogen atom. Although the physical interpretation of these states may initially be of more academic interest, it furthers our understanding of open problems related to quasinormal modes in a similar spirit to Maggiore's interpretation of the Schwarzschild quasinormal mode spectrum. One surprising insight from the explicit calculation of bound states is that eigenfunctions corresponding to quasinormal mode overtones become rapidly delocalized and extremely loosely bound. This observation raises immediate questions about the common interpretation of quasinormal modes as excitations of the lightring region. Closely related, as a second application, we also explore the spectral stability of bound states and demonstrate that they can provide complementary insights into the quasinormal mode spectrum.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.17186 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Inverted Regge-Wheeler potential without (black [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Spectrum of bound states [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Here we relate the Regge-Wheeler bound states [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Here we compare the bound states of the Regge [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Here we show the separation of subsequent energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Here, we show the exponential convergence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Inverted Regge-Wheeler potential for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Here we show the separation of subsequent energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gravitational Bound State Perturbations Inside Black Holes and Isospectrality

    gr-qc 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Polar perturbations inside Schwarzschild have ℓ−1 bound states; ℓ−2 of them are exactly isospectral to axial bound states, and the extra ground state is the algebraically special mode, yielding ΔA = 16π l_Pl².

  2. Comment on "On the bound states of the Schwarzschild black hole" by S. H. V\"olkel: A Reassessment of the Bound-State Analogy

    gr-qc 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A critique of Völkel's inverted Regge-Wheeler bound-state model, showing it cannot reproduce the complex quasinormal spectrum of Schwarzschild black holes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [29]

    M. G. Richarte, J. C. Fabris, and A. Saa, Quasinormal modes and the analytical continuation of non-self-adjoint operators (2024) arXiv:2409.00857 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Dreyer, B

    O. Dreyer, B. J. Kelly, B. Krishnan, L. S. Finn, D. Gar- rison, and R. Lopez-Aleman, Black hole spectroscopy: Testing general relativity through gravitational wave ob- servations, Class. Quant. Grav.21, 787 (2004), arXiv:gr- qc/0309007

    arXiv 2004

  3. [2]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2016

  4. [3]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Tests of general relativity with GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 221101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 129902 (2018)], arXiv:1602.03841 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2016

  5. [4]

    Dafermos, G

    M. Dafermos, G. Holzegel, and I. Rodnianski, The linear stability of the Schwarzschild solution to grav- itational perturbations, Acta Math.222, 1 (2019), arXiv:1601.06467 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2019

  6. [5]

    Berti, K

    E. Berti, K. Yagi, H. Yang, and N. Yunes, Extreme Grav- ity Tests with Gravitational Waves from Compact Bi- nary Coalescences: (II) Ringdown, Gen. Rel. Grav.50, 49 (2018), arXiv:1801.03587 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2018

  7. [6]

    Cardoso and P

    V. Cardoso and P. Pani, Testing the nature of dark com- pact objects: a status report, Living Rev. Rel.22, 4 (2019), arXiv:1904.05363 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2019

  8. [7]

    Franchini and S

    N. Franchini and S. H. Völkel, Testing General Rela- tivity with Black Hole Quasi-Normal Modes, (2023), arXiv:2305.01696 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

Show all 65 references
  1. [8]

    Hod, Bohr’s correspondence principle and the area spectrum of quantum black holes, Phys

    S. Hod, Bohr’s correspondence principle and the area spectrum of quantum black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 4293 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9812002

    1998 arXiv

  2. [9]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Quasinormal modes of stars and black holes, Living Rev. Rel.2, 2 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9909058

    1999 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Nollert, Topical review: Quasinormal modes: the characteristic ‘sound’ of black holes and neutron stars, Class

    H.-P. Nollert, Topical review: Quasinormal modes: the characteristic ‘sound’ of black holes and neutron stars, Class. Quant. Grav.16, R159 (1999)

    1999

  4. [11]

    Berti, V

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes, Class. Quant. Grav.26, 163001 (2009), arXiv:0905.2975 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  5. [12]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Quasinormal modes of black holes: From astrophysics to string theory, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 793 (2011), arXiv:1102.4014 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Regge and J

    T. Regge and J. A. Wheeler, Stability of a Schwarzschild singularity, Phys. Rev.108, 1063 (1957)

    1957

  7. [14]

    F. J. Zerilli, Effective potential for even parity Regge- Wheelergravitationalperturbationequations,Phys.Rev. Lett.24, 737 (1970)

    1970

  8. [15]

    Chandrasekhar and S

    S. Chandrasekhar and S. L. Detweiler, The quasi-normal modes of the Schwarzschild black hole, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A344, 441 (1975)

    1975

  9. [16]

    Nollert, Quasinormal modes of Schwarzschild black holes: The determination of quasinormal frequencies with very large imaginary parts, Phys

    H.-P. Nollert, Quasinormal modes of Schwarzschild black holes: The determination of quasinormal frequencies with very large imaginary parts, Phys. Rev. D47, 5253 (1993)

    1993

  10. [17]

    Chandrasekhar, V

    S. Chandrasekhar, V. Ferrari, and J. E. Enderby, On the non-radial oscillations of a star. III. A reconsideration of the axial modes, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences 434, 449 (1991)

    1991

  11. [18]

    K. D. Kokkotas, Axial modes for relativistic stars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.268, 1015 (1994)

    1994

  12. [19]

    Maggiore, The Physical interpretation of the spec- trum of black hole quasinormal modes, Phys

    M. Maggiore, The Physical interpretation of the spec- trum of black hole quasinormal modes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 141301 (2008), arXiv:0711.3145 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  13. [20]

    J. D. Bekenstein, The quantum mass spectrum of the Kerr black hole, Lett. Nuovo Cim.11, 467 (1974)

    1974

  14. [21]

    V. F. Mukhanov, Are black holes quantized?, JETP Lett. 44, 63 (1986)

    1986

  15. [22]

    Mashhoon, Quasinormal modes of a black hole, in3rd Marcel Grossmann Meeting on the Recent Developments of General Relativity(1982)

    B. Mashhoon, Quasinormal modes of a black hole, in3rd Marcel Grossmann Meeting on the Recent Developments of General Relativity(1982)

    1982

  16. [23]

    Blome and B

    H.-J. Blome and B. Mashhoon, Quasi-normal oscillations of a schwarzschild black hole, Physics Letters A100, 231 (1984)

    1984

  17. [24]

    Ferrari and B

    V. Ferrari and B. Mashhoon, Oscillations of a Black Hole, Phys. Rev. Lett.52, 1361 (1984)

    1984

  18. [25]

    Ferrari and B

    V. Ferrari and B. Mashhoon, New approach to the quasi- normal modes of a black hole, Phys. Rev. D30, 295 (1984)

    1984

  19. [26]

    S. H. Völkel, Quasinormal modes from bound states: The numerical approach, Phys. Rev. D106, 124009 (2022), arXiv:2210.02069 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Hatsuda, Quasinormal modes of black holes and Borel summation, Phys

    Y. Hatsuda, Quasinormal modes of black holes and Borel summation, Phys. Rev. D101, 024008 (2020), arXiv:1906.07232 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Aminov, A

    G. Aminov, A. Grassi, and Y. Hatsuda, Black Hole Quasinormal Modes and Seiberg–Witten Theory, An- nales Henri Poincare23, 1951 (2022), arXiv:2006.06111 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Burgess and F

    C. Burgess and F. Koenig, Hyperboloidal Method for Quasinormal Modes of Non-Relativistic Operators, Front. Phys.12, 1457543 (2024), arXiv:2407.01487 [physics.comp-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    K. D. Kokkotas, Normal modes of the Kerr black hole, Class. Quant. Grav.8, 2217 (1991)

    1991

  24. [32]

    Liu and B

    H. Liu and B. Mashhoon, On the spectrum of oscillations of a Schwarzschild black hole, Classical and Quantum Gravity13, 233 (1996)

    1996

  25. [33]

    Buonanno and T

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour, Effective one-body ap- proach to general relativistic two-body dynamics, Phys. Rev. D59, 084006 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9811091

    1999 arXiv

  26. [34]

    G.KälinandR.A.Porto,FromBoundaryDatatoBound States, JHEP01, 072, arXiv:1910.03008 [hep-th]

    1910 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Nollert, About the significance of quasinormal modes of black holes, Phys

    H.-P. Nollert, About the significance of quasinormal modes of black holes, Phys. Rev. D53, 4397 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9602032

    1996 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Nollert and R

    H.-P. Nollert and R. H. Price, Quantifying excitations of quasinormal mode systems, J. Math. Phys.40, 980 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9810074

    1999 arXiv

  29. [37]

    E.Barausse, V.Cardoso,andP.Pani,Canenvironmental effects spoil precision gravitational-wave astrophysics?, Phys. Rev. D89, 104059 (2014), arXiv:1404.7149 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  30. [38]

    J. L. Jaramillo, R. Panosso Macedo, and L. Al Sheikh, Pseudospectrum and Black Hole Quasinormal 7 Mode Instability, Phys. Rev. X11, 031003 (2021), arXiv:2004.06434 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  31. [39]

    M. H.-Y. Cheung, K. Destounis, R. P. Macedo, E. Berti, and V. Cardoso, Destabilizing the Fundamental Mode of Black Holes: The Elephant and the Flea, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 111103 (2022), arXiv:2111.05415 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Berti, V

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, M. H.-Y. Cheung, F. Di Filippo, F. Duque, P. Martens, and S. Mukohyama, Stability of the fundamental quasinormal mode in time-domain observations against small perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 106, 084011 (2022), arXiv:2205.08547 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Cardoso, S

    V. Cardoso, S. Kastha, and R. Panosso Macedo, Phys- ical significance of the black hole quasinormal mode spectra instability, Phys. Rev. D110, 024016 (2024), arXiv:2404.01374 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Ianniccari, A

    A. Ianniccari, A. J. Iovino, A. Kehagias, P. Pani, G. Perna, D. Perrone, and A. Riotto, Deciphering the Instability of the Black Hole Ringdown Quasinor- mal Spectrum, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 211401 (2024), arXiv:2407.20144 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    P. H. C. Siqueira, L. T. de Paula, R. Panosso Macedo, and M. Richartz, Probing the Unstable Spectrum of Schwarzschild-likeBlackHoles, (2025),arXiv:2501.13815 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  36. [44]

    M. S. Churilova, R. A. Konoplya, and A. Zhidenko, Ana- lytic formula for quasinormal modes in the near-extreme Kerr-Newman–de Sitter spacetime governed by a non- Pöschl-Tellerpotential,Phys.Rev.D105,084003(2022), arXiv:2108.04858 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Zimmerman, H

    A. Zimmerman, H. Yang, Z. Mark, Y. Chen, and L. Lehner, Quasinormal Modes Beyond Kerr, Astrophys. Space Sci. Proc.40, 217 (2015), arXiv:1406.4206 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Z. Mark, H. Yang, A. Zimmerman, and Y. Chen, Quasi- normal modes of weakly charged Kerr-Newman space- times, Phys. Rev. D91, 044025 (2015), arXiv:1409.5800 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Hussain and A

    A. Hussain and A. Zimmerman, Approach to computing spectral shifts for black holes beyond Kerr, Phys. Rev. D 106, 104018 (2022), arXiv:2206.10653 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  40. [48]

    D. Li, A. Hussain, P. Wagle, Y. Chen, N. Yunes, and A. Zimmerman, Isospectrality breaking in the Teukol- sky formalism, Phys. Rev. D109, 104026 (2024), arXiv:2310.06033 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Wagle, D

    P. Wagle, D. Li, Y. Chen, and N. Yunes, Perturbations of spinning black holes in dynamical Chern-Simons grav- ity: Slow rotation equations, Phys. Rev. D109, 104029 (2024), arXiv:2311.07706 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Ma and H

    S. Ma and H. Yang, Excitation of quadratic quasinormal modes for Kerr black holes, Phys. Rev. D109, 104070 (2024), arXiv:2401.15516 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Weller, D

    C. Weller, D. Li, and Y. Chen, Spectroscopy of bumpy BHs: The nonrotating case, Phys. Rev. D111, 024064 (2025), arXiv:2405.20934 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  44. [52]

    D. Li, P. Wagle, Y. Chen, and N. Yunes, Perturba- tions of spinning black holes in dynamical Chern-Simons gravity: Slow rotation quasinormal modes, (2025), arXiv:2503.15606 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  45. [53]

    B. F. Schutz and C. M. Will, Black hole normal modes: A semianalytic approach , Astrophys. J. Lett.291, L33 (1985)

    1985

  46. [54]

    Bender, S

    C. Bender, S. Orszag, and S. Orszag,Advanced Mathe- matical Methods for Scientists and Engineers I: Asymp- totic Methods and Perturbation Theory, Advanced Math- ematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers (Springer, 1999)

    1999

  47. [55]

    H. E. Camblong, L. N. Epele, H. Fanchiotti, and C. A. Garcia Canal, Renormalization of the inverse square po- tential, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 1590 (2000), arXiv:hep- th/0003014

    2000

  48. [56]

    S. A. Coon and B. R. Holstein, Anomalies in Quantum Mechanics: the1{r 2 Potential, Am. J. Phys.70, 513 (2002), arXiv:quant-ph/0202091

    2002 arXiv

  49. [57]

    R. H. Price, Nonspherical Perturbations of Relativistic Gravitational Collapse. II. Integer-Spin, Zero-Rest-Mass Fields, Phys. Rev. D5, 2439 (1972)

    1972

  50. [58]

    Steinhauer, The continuous spectrum of quasinor- mal modes in a Schwarzschild black hole, (2025), arXiv:2503.01029 [gr-qc]

    J. Steinhauer, The continuous spectrum of quasinor- mal modes in a Schwarzschild black hole, (2025), arXiv:2503.01029 [gr-qc]

    2025

  51. [59]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, First few over- tones probe the event horizon geometry, (2022), arXiv:2209.00679 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  52. [60]

    H. O. Silva, G. Tambalo, K. Glampedakis, K. Yagi, and J. Steinhoff, Quasinormal modes and their excitation be- yond general relativity, Phys. Rev. D110, 024042 (2024), arXiv:2404.11110 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Baibhav, M

    V. Baibhav, M. H.-Y. Cheung, E. Berti, V. Cardoso, G. Carullo, R. Cotesta, W. Del Pozzo, and F. Duque, Agnostic black hole spectroscopy: Quasinormal mode content of numerical relativity waveforms and limits of validity of linear perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D108, 104020 (20...

    2023 arXiv

  54. [62]

    P. J. Nee, S. H. Völkel, and H. P. Pfeiffer, Role of black hole quasinormal mode overtones for ringdown analysis, Phys. Rev. D108, 044032 (2023), arXiv:2302.06634 [gr- qc]

    2023 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Giesleret al., Overtones and nonlinearities in binary black hole ringdowns, Phys

    M. Giesleret al., Overtones and nonlinearities in binary black hole ringdowns, Phys. Rev. D111, 084041 (2025), arXiv:2411.11269 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Thomopoulos, S

    S. Thomopoulos, S. H. Völkel, and H. P. Pfeiffer, Ring- down spectroscopy of phenomenologically modified black holes, (2025), arXiv:2504.17848 [gr-qc]

    2025

  57. [65]

    Völkel, Tabulated data for bound states and eigen- functions., 10.5281/zenodo.15577458 (2025)

    S. Völkel, Tabulated data for bound states and eigen- functions., 10.5281/zenodo.15577458 (2025). 8 Supplementary material Convergence ofK In Fig. 6, we show the convergence ofKn toKfrom Eq. (7) for the two potentials. Note that for largeně3 the slope is very similar for both ...

    2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.