pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2505.20414 · v2 · submitted 2025-05-26 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI· cs.RO

Recognition: unknown

RetroMotion: Retrocausal Motion Forecasting Models are Instructable

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AIcs.RO
keywords distributionsagentsjointmotionmarginalmodelforecastingforecasts
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Motion forecasts of road users (i.e., agents) vary in complexity depending on the number of agents, scene constraints, and interactions. In particular, the output space of joint trajectory distributions grows exponentially with the number of agents. Therefore, we decompose multi-agent motion forecasts into (1) marginal distributions for all modeled agents and (2) joint distributions for interacting agents. Using a transformer model, we generate joint distributions by re-encoding marginal distributions followed by pairwise modeling. This incorporates a retrocausal flow of information from later points in marginal trajectories to earlier points in joint trajectories. For each time step, we model the positional uncertainty using compressed exponential power distributions. Notably, our method achieves strong results in the Waymo Interaction Prediction Challenge and generalizes well to the Argoverse 2 and V2X-Seq datasets. Additionally, our method provides an interface for issuing instructions. We show that standard motion forecasting training implicitly enables the model to follow instructions and adapt them to the scene context. GitHub repository: https://github.com/kit-mrt/future-motion

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Causality-Aware End-to-End Autonomous Driving via Ego-Centric Joint Scene Modeling

    cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    CaAD adds ego-centric joint-causal modeling and causality-aware policy alignment to end-to-end driving, reporting Driving Score 87.53 and Success Rate 71.81 on Bench2Drive plus PDMS 91.1 on NAVSIM.