Fractional Quantum Hall Anyons via the Algebraic Topology of Exotic Flux Quanta

Hisham Sati; Urs Schreiber

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Fractional Quantum Hall Anyons via the Algebraic Topology of Exotic Flux Quanta

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Fractional quantum Hall anyons may be flux quantized on a 2-sphere, with braiding phases and torus degeneracy derived from homotopy theory alone.

desk verdict Serious, mathematically careful case for 2-Cohomotopy as the flux quantization law for FQH anyons, with the central quantization prescription itself the main un-derived premise. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.22144 v2 pith:RRIEUU65 submitted 2025-05-28 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-elhep-thmath-phmath.ATmath.MP

Hisham Sati , Urs Schreiber This is my paper

classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-elhep-thmath-phmath.ATmath.MP MSC 55N2081T4581V70

keywords fractionalquantumHalleffectanyons2-CohomotopyfluxquantizationChern-Simonstheorytopologicalorderbraidingphaseshomotopy

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Fractional quantum Hall systems are the leading experimental arena for anyons, yet their effective theory has usually been sought in Chern-Simons Lagrangians that are hard to reconcile with flux quantization. This paper argues that the correct non-perturbative flux quantization law for such systems is 2-Cohomotopy: topological magnetic flux is classified by maps into a 2-sphere. From that single choice, and a quantization prescription in which quantum states are irreducible unitary representations of the fundamental group of the covariantized flux moduli space, the authors derive the anyonic braiding phases, torus ground-state degeneracy, edge-mode structure, and Wilson-loop observables of abelian Chern-Simons theory. The hypothesis also yields new predictions: ground-state degeneracy that generally differs from K-matrix Chern-Simons theory, and non-abelian defect anyons at flux-expelling punctures, such as superconducting islands in a semiconducting sample.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the covariantized flux monodromy group π1(Map*_0((Σ²)∪{∞}, S²) ⋊ Diff(Σ²)). Because the paper's quantization prescription takes irreducible unitary representations of this group as the spaces of quantum states, every prediction reduces to computing this fundamental group and its representations. For closed surfaces this group is a semidirect product of the mapping class group with the integer Heisenberg group Ẑ^{2g} at level 2 (Prop. 3.19), and for punctured surfaces it becomes a framed braid group. The Hopf fibration, as generator of π3(S²), enters as the central observable bζ that carries the braiding phase.

What would settle it

Measure the torus ground-state degeneracy of an FQH system at a non-unit filling fraction with gcd(p,K)=1: 2-Cohomotopy predicts degeneracy K independent of p, while K-matrix Chern-Simons theory predicts a determinant that generally differs. A measured degeneracy different from K would falsify the 2-Cohomotopy hypothesis; similarly, the predicted non-abelian defect anyons at flux-expelling islands could be falsified by null braiding experiments at superconducting islands in FQH samples.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that fractional quantum Hall flux is quantized in 2-Cohomotopy, meaning the effective classifying space is A = S², so that flux solitons are maps from the one-point-compactified surface to the 2-sphere and their topological quantum states are irreducible unitary representations of the fundamental group of the covariantized moduli space Map*_0((Σ²)∪{∞}, S²) ⋊ Diff(Σ²). Under this hypothesis the authors prove that the central monodromy observable is the Hopf fibration, that on closed surfaces the flux monodromy is the integer Heisenberg group at level 2, and that covariantizable irreducible representations reproduce the braiding phase ζ = $e^{{π i p/K}}$ and torus degeneracy K. They thereby recover, by purely algebro-topological means, the fine structure of abelian spin Chern-Simons theory, and they predict new phenomena at punctures, including possibly non-abelian defect anyons.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that quantum states of topological flux are exactly the irreducible unitary representations of the fundamental group of the covariantized flux moduli space, a prescription extended by analogy from ordinary Yang-Mills flux rather than derived from FQH dynamics; if the true non-perturbative quantization is not captured by these monodromy representations, the recovered braiding phases, degeneracies, and defect-anyon predictions do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

On the torus, the theory predicts ground-state degeneracy K for every admissible braiding phase ζ = e^{π i p/K}, with 12 fine-structure variants from modular characters over the pp-spin torus; this differs from K-matrix Chern-Simons theory away from unit filling fractions.
Flux-expelling punctures in the FQH material behave as defect anyons: on the 2-punctured disk the covariantized monodromy contains a framed symmetric group whose standard 2-dimensional irreducible representation realizes a non-Clifford rotation gate.
The framed-link observables reproduce the regularized Wilson-loop expectation values of abelian Chern-Simons theory, with framing regularization arising automatically from the moduli space rather than being added by hand.
On the open annulus, edge-mode phases ξ_in and ξ_out are separately observable and the ground state becomes 2-fold degenerate when their ratio is not ±1.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the 2-Cohomotopy hypothesis is correct, the same monodromy-representation prescription could classify topological orders for other material platforms by substituting different classifying spaces, making braiding data a package of homotopy-theoretic invariants.
The predicted degeneracy difference on the torus at non-unit filling offers a comparatively clean experimental discriminator, since it does not require spatial braiding but only thermodynamic or interferometric counting of ground states.
The appearance of the symmetric group rather than a braid group as the defect-anyon statistics suggests that some candidate non-abelian anyon platforms may in reality implement permutation-based parastatistical gates whose fault tolerance is even stronger than braiding, a distinction that could be probed by interferometry.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Dear [Name],

I read the Sati–Schreiber paper. It is a serious piece of mathematical physics: under the explicitly stated hypothesis that FQH flux is quantized in 2-Cohomotopy (classifying space S^2), they derive a large slice of the standard FQH/CS lore—fractional braiding phases, torus modular data, Wilson-loop observables with framing regularization appearing naturally—and they add genuinely new predictions: torus ground-state degeneracy K independent of p, and non-abelian defect anyons at flux-expelling punctures, with an explicit 2×2 non-Clifford gate from the standard representation of Sym3.

The mathematics looks careful. Proofs use solid algebraic topology and representation theory, and the authors are candid about what is hypothesis and what is derived. I had the same worry as your reader about circularity: A=S^2 is motivated in part by matching the Chern–Simons Bianchi identities at the rational level, so some downstream agreement with CS theory is input echo. That is real but not disqualifying—the framework reproduces the CS results as a consistency check, and the new predictions go beyond what was put in.

The stronger, less-discussed soft spot is Def. 2.11: quantum states are declared to be irreducible unitary representations of the fundamental group of the covariantized flux moduli space. For ordinary Yang–Mills flux this comes from a C*-algebraic deformation quantization; for A=S^2 it is a postulate. If the correct non-perturbative quantization of FQH flux is not captured by this monodromy-group recipe, the whole chain of results does not follow. The braiding phase ζ also remains a free label (a root of unity chosen by the representation), not a predicted number—so the theory constrains the form of braiding, not the filling fraction.

The punctured-disk prediction of non-abelian defect anyons is the sharpest falsifiable target. If superconducting islands inside an FQH sample fail to show parastatistical or non-abelian exchange, the central hypothesis would need serious revision. That said, the paper is honest about its conditional status and provides enough machinery for a referee to check each step.

This deserves peer review. A good referee will press on Def. 2.11 and probe the input-echo concern, but the paper is exactly the kind of rigorous framework that should be on record and tested. I would bring it to our reading group, though I would warn people that the payoff is in §3.4 and §3.8; the early sections are heavy going.

Best, [You]

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that effective magnetic flux quantization in fractional quantum Hall (FQH) systems is governed by 2-Cohomotopy, i.e., the classifying space A = S^2. It develops a non-Lagrangian quantization prescription (Def. 2.11) in which generally covariant topological flux quantum states are irreducible unitary representations of the fundamental group of the covariantized flux moduli space Map*_0((Σ^2)∪{∞}, A) ⋊ Diff. Under this prescription, the paper derives, for A = S^2, the anyonic braiding phase ζ = e^{π i p/K}, Wilson-loop observables of abelian Chern-Simons theory, torus ground-state degeneracy K, edge-mode behavior on the annulus, and non-abelian defect anyon predictions on punctured disks. The 2-Cohomotopy hypothesis is explicitly labeled as a hypothesis; the paper presents consistency checks and novel predictions, notably in §3.8.

Significance. If the central two premises (Def. 2.11 and hypothesis h) are accepted, the paper gives a rigorous homotopy-theoretic re-derivation of abelian Chern-Simons modular data and makes novel falsifiable predictions. The mathematical work is detailed: Prop. 2.24, Prop. 3.19, Prop. 3.38, and Thm. 3.44 are proved from stated algebraic-topology facts, with references to [128, 180, 157] for the key Heisenberg-extension result. The paper is commendably explicit that A = S^2 is a hypothesis and that its Sullivan model is related to Chern-Simons Bianchi identities. The genuinely new content, especially the distinction between solitonic and defect anyons and the Sym3 parastatistics of Prop. 3.61, is concrete enough to be tested in principle. However, the significance is conditional: Def. 2.11 is a postulate, not derived from FQH dynamics, and ζ = e^{π i p/K} is an input label rather than a prediction. The paper's contribution is best read as a proposal of a framework with consistency checks, not as a derivation from microscopic physics.

major comments (4)

[Def. 2.11, Eq. (21)] The quantization prescription is the load-bearing premise and is not derived for A = S^2. The text admits this immediately before Def. 2.11 ('Since no other established rules...'); for ordinary Yang-Mills flux, Prop. 2.6 provides a C*-algebraic deformation-quantization derivation, but no analogous derivation is supplied for A = S^2. All subsequent results—braid phases, torus degeneracy, defect-anyon statistics—are consequences of this postulate. Please either provide an argument for the prescription in the relevant case, or state it explicitly as a second hypothesis alongside h and adjust the strength of the claims accordingly.
[§3.1–3.4, Eq. (6)] The choice A = S^2 is motivated by the fact that its Sullivan minimal model reproduces the Chern-Simons Bianchi identities (Eq. 6). Consequently, the recovery of Chern-Simons Wilson-loop observables and torus modular data in §3.1–3.4 is partly an input echo, not an independent confirmation. The paper should delineate which results are guaranteed by the construction and which are genuinely independent tests. The novel content in §3.4 (degeneracy K independent of p) and §3.8 (defect anyons) should be presented as the discriminating predictions, and the consistency checks should be labeled as such.
[§3.8, Prop. 3.61] The central novel prediction—that flux-expelling punctures behave as non-abelian defect anyons with Sym3 parastatistics and a non-Clifford gate—depends on identifying physical defects (e.g., superconducting islands) with punctures in the topological flux quantization. The manuscript does not provide a microscopic or mesoscopic model justifying this identification, and it does not specify an experimental discriminator that would distinguish the Sym3 prediction from the parafermion/K-matrix expectations cited in Rem. 3.63. Please state a concrete observable test, or make explicit that the prediction is conditional on the defect realization.
[Thm. 3.44, Rem. 3.39] The claim that torus ground-state degeneracy is K, independent of p, is presented as a difference from K-matrix Chern-Simons predictions, but no concrete non-unit filling fraction or material system is named where this difference would be observable. Because torus FQH geometries are not readily realizable (footnote 10), the authors should either identify an experimentally accessible proxy, such as finite-size or genon-based systems, or soften the claim.

minor comments (5)

[§2.3] The word 'Hoaever' should be 'However'.
[Prop. 2.21, Eq. (42)] The label 'MGC' in item (c) should be 'MCG'.
[Figures] Figure D appears twice, once in the Introduction and once in §2.2, with different content; renumber to avoid confusion.
[Rem. 3.42] The phrase 'This makes sens' should read 'This makes sense'.
[§3.8] The phrase 'parastatistic' should be 'parastatistics'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper transparently derives consequences from an explicitly flagged hypothesis, with the FQH braiding phase entering as a representation label rather than a fitted output.

full rationale

The central construction is Def. 2.11, which postulates that covariant topological flux quantum states are irreducible unitary representations of the fundamental group of the covariantized flux moduli space. This is an un-derived quantization prescription, generalized by analogy from the Yang-Mills case (Prop. 2.6, citing [249]). A postulate is not circular; the paper explicitly labels the further choice A = S^2 as "hypothesis h" and states the main results are conditional on it. The recovery of Chern-Simons-type Wilson loop observables (Prop. 3.11 and Rem. 3.13) is not an input echo: the identification of loops in the flux moduli space with framed links and of their homotopy class with the writhe is a non-trivial theorem (Segal-Okuyama, cited from [250]), and the phase zeta is a free label of the one-dimensional representation of Z, not a fitted value. The torus degeneracy K (Thm. 3.44) follows from the representation theory of the integer Heisenberg group once one selects the central character zeta = e^{pi i p/K}; it is a derived relation between the order of the phase and the Hilbert space dimension, not an assumed degeneracy. The novel predictions (non-abelian defect anyons on punctured disks, parastatistical Sym3 representations, and the non-Clifford gate of Prop. 3.61) are consequences of mapping class group computations and standard representation theory, and they are experimentally falsifiable. Self-citations to [249], [250], and [252] concern mathematical theorems (Yang-Mills flux quantization, Segal-Okuyama, and the earlier Hypothesis H analogy) whose stated assumptions do not include the FQH results being derived; they are independent support rather than a circular chain. No equation in the paper is equivalent to its input by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The theory rests on a new quantization postulate and a physical hypothesis, both ad hoc to this program; the remaining inputs are standard algebraic topology and representation theory. The main free label is the braiding phase ζ, which parametrizes irreducible representations rather than being derived from a parameter-free principle. No new particles, forces, fields, or dimensions are posited.

free parameters (2)

braiding phase ζ = e^{π i p/K} = not fixed; admissible pairs (p,K) with gcd(p,K)=1, Kp even for pp-torus
Labels the irreducible representations of the flux monodromy group (Lem. 3.36, Props. 3.38, 3.41). The theory classifies possible phases but does not predict which one occurs; experimental FQH values select it.
torus spin structure = pp or aa
Determines which filling-fraction-like phases are admissible (Prop. 3.43). This is a modeling choice, not a fitted number, but it affects predictions.

assumptions (5)

ad hoc to paper Definition 2.11 quantization prescription: quantum states of generally covariant topological flux are irreducible unitary representations of the fundamental group of the covariantized flux moduli space.
This is the foundational quantization postulate, generalized from Yang-Mills flux (Prop 2.6). All subsequent results depend on it, and it is not derived from FQH dynamics.
ad hoc to paper Hypothesis h: effective FQH flux quantization is 2-Cohomotopy, i.e. the classifying space is A = S^2.
Explicitly stated as a hypothesis in the abstract and Conclusion; supported by consistency checks and rational-model evidence but not derived from microscopic physics.
standard math The rational model of S^2 (dF2=0, dH3=F2^2) matches the Chern-Simons Bianchi identities and motivates A=S^2.
Used in eq. (6) as a plausibility argument. The mathematical fact is standard, but its physical significance is part of the hypothesis.
domain assumption Punctures in the surface model flux-expelling material defects such as superconducting islands.
Introduced in Fig D, Fig I, and Rem 3.63; the experimental relevance of defect-anyon predictions depends on this identification.
standard math Standard algebraic topology results: Pontrjagin theorem, Segal-Okuyama theorem, May-Segal theorem, diffeomorphism group homotopy types, and the integer Heisenberg extension.
Invoked throughout §3; these are established mathematical theorems, not new assumptions introduced by the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fractional Quantum Hall Anyons via the Algebraic Topology of Exotic Flux Quanta." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RRIEUU65

@misc{pith2026250522144,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fractional Quantum Hall Anyons via the Algebraic Topology of Exotic Flux Quanta},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RRIEUU65}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.22144}
}

read the original abstract

Fractional quantum Hall systems (FQH), due to their experimentally observed anyonic topological order, are a main contender for future hardware-implementation of error-protected quantum registers ("topological qbits") subject to error-protected quantum operations ("topological quantum gates"), both plausibly necessary for future quantum computing at useful scale, but both remaining insufficiently understood. Here we present a novel non-Lagrangian effective description of FQH anyons, based on previously elusive proper global quantization of effective topological flux in extraordinary non-abelian cohomology theories. This directly translates the system's quantum -observables, -states, -symmetries, and -measurement channels into purely algebro-topological analysis of local systems of Hilbert spaces over the quantized flux moduli spaces. Under the hypothesis -- for which we provide a fair bit of evidence -- that the appropriate effective flux quantization of FQH systems is in 2-Cohomotopy theory (a cousin of Hypothesis H in high-energy physics), the results here are rigorously derived and as such might usefully inform laboratory searches for novel anyonic phenomena in FQH systems and hence for topological quantum hardware.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Engineering two-body interaction for the Moore-Read State
cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Gradient-optimized two-body Haldane pseudopotentials yield Moore–Read Pfaffian overlaps above 99% up to 12 electrons and collapse to a nearly universal exponential short-range profile.
Higher Gauge Theory via Differential Nonabelian Cohomology
hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

Higher gauge fields receive a global infrared completion by electromagnetic flux quantization in differential nonabelian cohomology using cohesive homotopy theory, with applications to brane charges in K-theory and Co...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

297 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[1]

C. A. Abad, Introduction to representations of braid groups , Rev. Colomb. Mat. 49 1 (2015), [doi:10.15446/recolma.v49n1.54160], [arXiv:1404.0724]

arXiv 2015
[2]

Ad´ amek, H

J. Ad´ amek, H. Herrlich, and G. Strecker, Abstract and Concrete Categories – The Joy of Cats , Wiley (1990), reprinted as: Reprints in Theory and Applications of Categories 17 (2006), 1-507, [ tac:tr17], [katmat.math.uni-bremen.de/acc]

1990
[3]

Aguilar, S

M. Aguilar, S. Gitler, and C. Prieto, Algebraic topology from a homotopical viewpoint , Springer (2002), [doi:10.1007/b97586]

work page doi:10.1007/b97586 2002
[4]

Alicea, Y

J. Alicea, Y. Oreg, G. Refael, F. von Oppen, and M. P. A. Fisher, Non-Abelian statistics and topological quantum information processing in 1D wire networks , Nature Physics 7 (2011) 412-417 [arXiv:1006.4395], [doi:10.1038/nphys1915]

arXiv 2011
[5]

Alvarez, Topological quantization and cohomology, Commun

O. Alvarez, Topological quantization and cohomology, Commun. Math. Phys. 100 2 (1985), 279-309, [euclid:cmp/1103943448]

arXiv 1985
[6]

Alvarez-Gaum´ e, G

L. Alvarez-Gaum´ e, G. Moore, and C. Vafa, Theta functions, modular invariance, and strings , Commun. Math. Phys. 106 1 (1986), 1-4, [ doi:10.1007/BF01210925], [euclid:cmp/1104115581]

arXiv 1986
[7]

Armitage and A

V. Armitage and A. Rogers, Gauss Sums and Quantum Mechanics , J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 33 (2000) 5993, [doi:10.1088/0305-4470/33/34/305], [arXiv:quant-ph/0003107]

arXiv 2000
[8]

D. P. Arovas, J. R. Schrieffer, and F. Wilczek, Fractional Statistics and the Quantum Hall Effect , Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 7 (1984), 722-723, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.722]

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.53.722 1984

Show all 297 references

[9]

D. V. Averin and V. J. Goldman, Quantum computation with quasiparticles of the fractional quantum Hall effect, Solid State Commun. 121 1 (2001), 25-28, [ doi:10.1016/S0038-1098(01)00447-1], [arXiv:cond-mat/0110193]

2001 arXiv
[10]

Awodey, Category theory, Oxford University Press (2006, 2010), [ ISBN:9780199237180], [doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198568612.001.0001]

S. Awodey, Category theory, Oxford University Press (2006, 2010), [ ISBN:9780199237180], [doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198568612.001.0001]

2006
[11]

D. J. Baker, Identity, Superselection Theory, and the Statistical Properties of Quantum Fields , Philosophy of Science 80 2 (2013), 262-285, [ doi:10.1086/670296]

2013 doi
[12]

A. P. Balachandran, S. G. Jo, and G. Marmo, Group Theory and Hopf Algebras – Lectures for Physicists , World Scientific (2010), [doi:10.1142/7872]

2010 doi
[14]

Barkeshli and X.-L

M. Barkeshli and X.-L. Qi, Synthetic Topological Qubits in Conventional Bilayer Quantum Hall Systems , Phys. Rev. X 4 (2014) 041035, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.4.041035], [arXiv:1302.2673]

2014 arXiv
[15]

Barkeshli and X.-G

M. Barkeshli and X.-G. Wen, Bilayer quantum Hall phase transitions and the orbifold non-Abelian fractional quantum Hall states , Phys. Rev. B 95 (2017) 085135, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.085135], [arXiv:1010.4270]

2017 arXiv
[16]

Bartolomei, M

H. Bartolomei, M. Kumar, R. Bisognin, A. Marguerite, J.-M. Berroir, E. Bocquillon, B. Pla¸ cais, A. Cavanna, Q. Dong, U. Gennser, Y. Jin, and G. F´ eve,Fractional statistics in anyon collisions, Science 368 6487 (2020), 173-177, [doi:10.1126/science.aaz5601], [arXiv:2006.13157]

2020 arXiv
[17]

Bhattacharjee, D

M. Bhattacharjee, D. Macpherson, R. G. M¨ oller, and P. M. Neumann,Notes on Infinite Permutation Groups, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1698, Springer (2006), 67-76, [ doi:10.1007/BFb0092558]

2006 doi
[18]

Borsuk, Sur les groupes des classes de transformations continues , CR Acad

K. Borsuk, Sur les groupes des classes de transformations continues , CR Acad. Sci. Paris 202 2-3 (1936), 1400-1403, [ark:12148/bpt6k3154f]

1936
[19]

Bouhon, T

A. Bouhon, T. Bzduˇ sek and R.-J. Slager,Geometric approach to fragile topology beyond symmetry indicators, Phys. Rev. B 102 (2020) 115135 [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.102.115135], [arXiv:2005.02044]

2020 arXiv
[20]

Bellingeri and S

P. Bellingeri and S. Gervais, Surface framed braids, Geom. Dedicata 159 (2012), 51–69, [arXiv:1001.4471], [doi:10.1007/s10711-011-9645-5]

2012 arXiv
[21]

Bellingeri, S

P. Bellingeri, S. Gervais, and J. Guaschi, Lower central series of Artin–Tits and surface braid groups, Journal of Algebra 319 4 (2008), 1409-1427, [ doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2007.10.023]

2008 doi
[22]

Belov and G

D. Belov and G. W. Moore, Classification of abelian spin Chern-Simons theories , [arXiv:hep-th/0505235]

arXiv
[23]

B. C. Berndt and R. J. Evans, The determination of Gauss sums , Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 5 (1981), 107-129, [ams:bull/1981-05-02/S0273-0979-1981-14930-2], [euclid:bams/1183548292]

1981
[24]

I. I. Beterov, Progress and Prospects in the Field of Quantum Computing , Optoelectron. Instrument. Proc. 60 (2024), 74–83, [ doi:10.3103/S8756699024700043]. 67

2024 doi
[25]

J. S. Birman, Mapping class groups and their relationship to braid groups , Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 22 2 (1969), 213-238, [ doi:10.1002/cpa.3160220206]

1969 doi
[26]

Blanc and J

J. Blanc and J. D´ eserti, Embeddings of SL(2, Z) into the Cremona group , Transform. Groups 17 1 (2012), 21-50, [doi:10.1007/s00031-012-9174-9], [arXiv:1103.0114]

2012 arXiv
[27]

Blanchet, M

C. Blanchet, M. Palmer and A. Shaukat, Heisenberg homology on surface configurations , [arXiv:2109.00515]
[28]

Blanchet, M

C. Blanchet, M. Palmer, and A. Shaukat, Action of subgroups of the mapping class group on Heisenberg homologies, Contemporary Mathematics 813, AMS (2025), [doi:10.1090/conm/813], [arXiv:2306.08614]

2025 arXiv
[29]

Blok and X.-G

B. Blok and X.-G. Wen, Effective theories of the fractional quantum Hall effect at generic filling fractions , Phys. Rev. B 42 (1990) 8133, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.42.8133]

1990 doi
[30]

Bloomquist, Mapping Class Group Notes (2024), [ncatlab.org/nlab/files/Bloomquist-MCG.pdf]

W. Bloomquist, Mapping Class Group Notes (2024), [ncatlab.org/nlab/files/Bloomquist-MCG.pdf]

2024
[31]

Bonderson, E

P. Bonderson, E. C. Rowell, Q. Zhang, and Z. Wang, Congruence Subgroups and Super-Modular Categories, Pacific J. Math. 296 (2018), 257-270, [ doi:10.2140/pjm.2018.296.257], [arXiv:1704.02041]

2018 arXiv
[32]

Borsboom and H

S. Borsboom and H. Posthuma, Global Gauge Symmetries and Spatial Asymptotic Boundary Conditions in Yang-Mills theory, [arXiv:2502.16151]

arXiv
[33]

F. Borceux, Basic Category Theory, Vol 1 of: Handbook of Categorical Algebra, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications 50, Cambridge University Press (1994), [ doi:10.1017/CBO9780511525858]

1994 doi
[34]

Bos and V

M. Bos and V. P. Nair, U (1) Chern-Simons theory and c = 1 conformal blocks, Phys. Lett. B 223 1 (1989), 61-66, [doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89)90920-9]

1989 doi
[35]

Bravyi, Universal Quantum Computation with the ν = 5/2 Fractional Quantum Hall State , Phys

S. Bravyi, Universal Quantum Computation with the ν = 5/2 Fractional Quantum Hall State , Phys. Rev. A 73 (2006) 042313, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.73.042313], [arXiv:quant-ph/0511178]

2006 arXiv
[36]

Bredon, Topology and Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 139, Springer (1993), [doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-6848-0]

G. Bredon, Topology and Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 139, Springer (1993), [doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-6848-0]

1993 doi
[37]

Brown, Cohomology of Groups , Graduate Texts in Mathematics 87, Springer (1982), [doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-9327-6]

K. Brown, Cohomology of Groups , Graduate Texts in Mathematics 87, Springer (1982), [doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-9327-6]

1982 doi
[38]

Carlip, Dynamics of Asymptotic Diffeomorphisms in (2 + 1)-Dimensional Gravity , Class

S. Carlip, Dynamics of Asymptotic Diffeomorphisms in (2 + 1)-Dimensional Gravity , Class. Quant. Grav. 22 (2005), 3055-3060, [ doi:10.1088/0264-9381/22/14/014], [arXiv:gr-qc/0501033]

2005 arXiv
[39]

Chakraborty, Subir Ghosh and R

B. Chakraborty, Subir Ghosh and R. P. Malik: CP 1 model with Hopf interaction: the quantum theory , Nucl. Phys. B 600 2 (2001) 351-377 [ arXiv:hep-th/0008168], [doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00060-8]

2001 arXiv
[40]

Chakraborty and P

T. Chakraborty and P. Pietil¨ ainen,The Quantum Hall Effects – Integral and Fractional , Springer Series in Solid State Sciences (1995), [ doi:10.1007/978-3-642-79319-6]

1995 doi
[41]

Chamon, D

C. Chamon, D. E. Freed, S. A. Kivelson, S. L. Sondhi, and X.-G. Wen, Two point-contact interferometer for quantum Hall systems , Phys. Rev. B 55 (1997) 2331, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.55.2331]

1997 doi
[42]

A. M. Chang, Chiral Luttinger liquids at the fractional quantum Hall edge , Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 (2003) 1449 [doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.75.1449]

2003 doi
[43]

Chen, Generalized Yang-Baxter Equations and Braiding Quantum Gates , J

R. Chen, Generalized Yang-Baxter Equations and Braiding Quantum Gates , J. Knot Theory Ramif. 21 09 (2012) 1250087, [ doi:10.1142/S0218216512500873], [arXiv:1108.5215]

2012 arXiv
[44]

A. C. N. Chowdhury, Quantum measurements with post-selection MSc theis, Kolkata (2013), [handle:123456789/255]

2013
[45]

F. M. Ciaglia, F. Di Cosmo, A. Ibort, and G. Marmo, Schwinger’s picture of Quantum Mechanics , Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 17 04 (2020) 2050054, [ doi:10.1142/S0219887820500541], [arXiv:2002.09326]

2020 arXiv
[46]

F. M. Ciaglia, A. Ibort, and G. Marmo, Schwinger’s Picture of Quantum Mechanics I: Groupoids , Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 16 08 (2019) 1950119, [ doi:10.1142/S0219887819501196], [arXiv:1905.12274]

2019 arXiv
[47]

D. J. Clarke, J. Alicea, and K. Shtengel, Exotic non-Abelian anyons from conventional fractional quantum Hall states , Nature Commun. 4 1348 (2013), [ ncomms:2340], [arXiv:1204.5479]

2013 arXiv
[48]

Clay Math Institute, The Millennium Prize Problems , [www.claymath.org/millennium-problems]
[49]

F. R. Cohen, Introduction to configuration spaces and their applications , in: Braids, Lecture Notes Series 19, Institute for Mathematical Sciences, National University of Singapore (2009), 183-261, [doi:10.1142/9789814291415 0003]

2009 doi
[50]

F. R. Cohen and J. Wu, On Braid Groups, Free Groups, and the Loop Space of the 2-Sphere , in: Categorical Decomposition Techniques in Algebraic Topology, Progress in Mathematics 215, Birkh¨ auser (2003), 93-105, [doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-7863-0 6]. 68

2003 doi
[51]

Conrad, SL 2(Z) , [ kconrad.math.uconn.edu/blurbs/grouptheory/SL(2,Z).pdf]

K. Conrad, SL 2(Z) , [ kconrad.math.uconn.edu/blurbs/grouptheory/SL(2,Z).pdf]
[52]

Corfield, H

D. Corfield, H. Sati, and U. Schreiber, Fundamental weight systems are quantum states Lett. Math. Phys. 113 112 (2023), [ doi:10.1007/s11005-023-01725-4], [arXiv:2105.02871]

2023 arXiv
[53]

N. R. Cooper, Rapidly Rotating Atomic Gases , Adv. Phys. 57 (2008), 539-616, [ arXiv:0810.4398], [doi:10.1080/00018730802564122]

2008 arXiv
[54]

Cruickshank, Twisted homotopy theory and the geometric equivariant 1-stem , Topology Appl

J. Cruickshank, Twisted homotopy theory and the geometric equivariant 1-stem , Topology Appl. 129 3 (2003), 251-271, [ doi:10.1016/S0166-8641(02)00183-9]

2003 doi
[55]

Cutler, The category of pointed topological spaces (2020), [ncatlab.org/nlab/files/CutlerPointedTopologicalSpaces.pdf]

T. Cutler, The category of pointed topological spaces (2020), [ncatlab.org/nlab/files/CutlerPointedTopologicalSpaces.pdf]

2020
[56]

DARPA, Quantum Benchmarking Initiative (2024), [www.darpa.mil/work-with-us/quantum-benchmarking-initiative]

2024
[57]

Das Sarma, Quantum computing has a hype problem , MIT Tech Review (March 2022), [www.technologyreview.com/2022/03/28/1048355/quantum-computing-has-a-hype-problem/]

S. Das Sarma, Quantum computing has a hype problem , MIT Tech Review (March 2022), [www.technologyreview.com/2022/03/28/1048355/quantum-computing-has-a-hype-problem/]

2022
[58]

Das Sarma, In search of Majorana , Nature Phys

S. Das Sarma, In search of Majorana , Nature Phys. 19 (2023), 165-170, [ arXiv:2210.17365], [doi:10.1038/s41567-022-01900-9]

2023 arXiv
[59]

Das Sarma, M

S. Das Sarma, M. Freedman, and C. Nayak,Topologically-Protected Qubits from a Possible Non-Abelian Frac- tional Quantum Hall State , Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 166802, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.166802], [arXiv:cond-mat/0412343]

2005 arXiv
[60]

Das Sarma and H

S. Das Sarma and H. Pan, Disorder-induced zero-bias peaks in Majorana nanowires , Phys. Rev. B 103 195158 (2021), [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.103.195158], [arXiv:2103.05628]

2021 arXiv
[61]

Deligne, Equations diff´ erentielles ` a points singuliers r´ eguliers, Lecture Notes Math

P. Deligne, Equations diff´ erentielles ` a points singuliers r´ eguliers, Lecture Notes Math. 163, Springer (1970), [publications.ias:355]

1970
[62]

De Renzi, A

M. De Renzi, A. M. Gainutdinov, N. Geer, B. Patureau-Mirand, and I. Runkel, Mapping Class Group Repre- sentations From Non-Semisimple TQFTs, Commun. Contemp. Math. (2021) 2150091, [arXiv:2010.14852], [doi:10.1142/S0219199721500917]

2021 arXiv
[63]

Di Francesco, P

P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. S´ en´ echal,Conformal field theory , Springer (1997), [doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2256-9]

1997 doi
[64]

Dijkgraaf and E

R. Dijkgraaf and E. Witten, Topological Gauge Theories and Group Cohomology , Commun. Math. Phys. 129 (1990) 393, [ doi:10.1007/BF02096988], [euclid:cmp/1104180750]

1990
[65]

Dimca, Sheaves in Topology, Universitext, Springer (2004), [ doi:10.1007/978-3-642-18868-8]

A. Dimca, Sheaves in Topology, Universitext, Springer (2004), [ doi:10.1007/978-3-642-18868-8]

2004 doi
[66]

Di Pierro, R

A. Di Pierro, R. Mengoni, R. Nagarajan, and D. Windridge, Hamming Distance Kernelisation via Topological Quantum Computation , in: Theory and Practice of Natural Computing. TPNC 2017 , Lecture Notes in Computer Science 10687, Springer (2017), 269-280, [ doi:10.1007/978-3-319-7...

2017 doi
[67]

Dolcetto, S

G. Dolcetto, S. Barbarino, D. Ferraro, N. Magnoli, and M. Sassetti, Tunneling between helical edge states through extended contacts, Phys. Rev. B 85 (2012) 195138, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.85.195138], [arXiv:1203.4486]

2012 arXiv
[68]

Doyle, Quadratic Form Gauss Sums , PhD thesis, U

G. Doyle, Quadratic Form Gauss Sums , PhD thesis, U. Ottawa (2016), [ doi:10.22215/etd/2016-11457]

2016 doi
[69]

Drut ¸u and M

C. Drut ¸u and M. Kapovich (appendix by B. Nica), Geometric group theory , Colloquium Publications 63, AMS (2018), [ ISBN:978-1-4704-1104-6]

2018
[70]

Dul, General Covariance from the Viewpoint of Stacks , Lett

F. Dul, General Covariance from the Viewpoint of Stacks , Lett. Math. Phys. 113 (2023) 30, [doi:10.1007/s11005-023-01653-3], [arXiv:2112.15473]

2023 arXiv
[71]

D. S. Dummit and R. M. Foote, Abstract Algebra, Wiley (2003), [ ISBN:978-0-471-43334-7]

2003
[72]

M. I. Dyakonov, Prospects for quantum computing: extremely doubtful , Int. J. of Modern Phys. Conf. Ser. 33 (2014) 1460357, [ doi:10.1142/S2010194514603573], [arXiv:1401.3629]

2014 arXiv
[73]

C. J. Earle and J. Eells, The diffeomorphism group of a compact Riemann surface , Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 73 4 (1967), 557-559, [ euclid:bams/1183528956]

1967
[75]

C. J. Earle and A. Schatz, Teichm¨ uller theory for surfaces with boundary, J. Differential Geom. 4 2 (1970), 169-185, [doi:10.4310/jdg/1214429381]

1970
[76]

Etingof, O

P. Etingof, O. Golberg, S. Hensel, T. Liu, A. Schwendner, D. Vaintrob, and E. Yudovina, Introduction to representation theory, Student Mathematical Library 59, AMS (2011), [ ams:stml-59], [arXiv:0901.0827]

2011 arXiv
[77]

Ezratty, Where are we heading with NISQ? , [arXiv:2305.09518]

O. Ezratty, Where are we heading with NISQ? , [arXiv:2305.09518]. 69

arXiv
[78]

Ezratty, Where are we heading with NISQ? , blog post (2023), [www.oezratty.net/wordpress/2023/where-are-we-heading-with-nisq]

O. Ezratty, Where are we heading with NISQ? , blog post (2023), [www.oezratty.net/wordpress/2023/where-are-we-heading-with-nisq]

2023
[79]

L. D. Faddeev, Knotted solitons , Proceedings of the ICM Beijing 2002 1, Higher Education Press (2002) 235-244 [arXiv:math-ph/0212079]

2002 arXiv
[80]

L. D. Faddeev and A. J. Niemi, Knots and Particles , Nature 387 (1997) 58–61 [ arXiv:hep-th/9610193], [doi;10.1038/387058a0]

1997 arXiv
[81]

Fadell and J

E. Fadell and J. Van Buskirk, On the braid groups of E2 and S2, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 67 2 (1961), 211-213, [euclid:bams/1183524083]

1961
[82]

Farb and D

B. Farb and D. Margalit, A primer on mapping class groups , Princeton University Press (2012), [ISBN:9780691147949], [jstor:j.ctt7rkjw]

2012
[83]

Ferraz, K

A. Ferraz, K. S. Gupta, G. W. Semenoff, and P. Sodano (eds),Strongly Coupled Field Theories for Condensed Matter and Quantum Information Theory , Springer Proceedings in Physics 239, Springer (2020), [doi:10.1007/978-3-030-35473-2]

2020 doi
[84]

Fiorenza, H

D. Fiorenza, H. Sati, and U. Schreiber, Twisted Cohomotopy implies M-theory anomaly cancellation on 8- manifolds, Commun. Math. Phys. 377 (2020), 1961-2025, [ doi:10.1007/s00220-020-03707-2], [arXiv:1904.10207]

2020 arXiv
[85]

Fiorenza, H

D. Fiorenza, H. Sati, and U. Schreiber, Twistorial Cohomotopy Implies Green-Schwarz anomaly cancellation, Rev. Math. Phys. 34 05 (2022) 2250013, [ doi:10.1142/S0129055X22500131], [arXiv:2008.08544]

2022 arXiv
[86]

Fiorenza, H

D. Fiorenza, H. Sati, and U. Schreiber, The Character map in Nonabelian Cohomology — Twisted, Differ- ential and Generalized , World Scientific, Singapore (2023), [ doi:10.1142/13422], [arXiv:2009.11909] NB: in the text we refer to the numbering of the published version, diffe...

2023 arXiv
[87]

Fomenko and D

A. Fomenko and D. Fuchs, Homotopical Topology, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 273, Springer (2016), [doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23488-5]

2016 doi
[88]

Forte, Quantum mechanics and field theory with fractional spin and statistics , Rev

S. Forte, Quantum mechanics and field theory with fractional spin and statistics , Rev. Mod. Phys. 64 (1992) 193 [doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.64.193]

1992 doi
[89]

A. G. Fowler and L. C. L. Hollenberg, Scalability of Shor’s algorithm with a limited set of rotation gates , Phys. Rev. A 70 (2007) 032329, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.103.032417]

2007 doi
[90]

R. H. Fox, L. Neuwirth, The braid groups , Math. Scand. 10 (1962), 119-126, [doi:10.7146/math.scand.a-10518]

1962 doi
[91]

Fradkin, Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics , Cambridge University Press (2013), [doi:10.1017/CBO9781139015509]

E. Fradkin, Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics , Cambridge University Press (2013), [doi:10.1017/CBO9781139015509]

2013 doi
[92]

Freed, Classical Chern-Simons theory, 1 , Adv

D. Freed, Classical Chern-Simons theory, 1 , Adv. Math. 113 (1995), 237-303, [ arXiv:hep-th/9206021], [doi:10.1006/aima.1995.1039]

1995 arXiv
[93]

Freed, M

D. Freed, M. Hopkins, J. Lurie, and C. Teleman, Topological Quantum Field Theories from Compact Lie Groups, in: A celebration of the mathematical legacy of Raoul Bott , AMS (2010), 367-403, [doi:10.1090/crmp/050], [arXiv:0905.0731]

2010 arXiv
[94]

D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore, and C. Teleman, Topological symmetry in quantum field theory, Quantum Topol- ogy 15 3/4 (2023), 779–869, [ doi:10.4171/qt/223], [arXiv:2209.07471]

2023 arXiv
[95]

Freedman, A

M. Freedman, A. Kitaev, M. Larsen, and Z. Wang, Topological quantum computation, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 40 (2003), 31-38, [ doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-02-00964-3], [arXiv:quant-ph/0101025]

2003 arXiv
[96]

Fr¨ ohlich and T

J. Fr¨ ohlich and T. Kerler, Universality in quantum Hall systems , Nucl. Phys. B 354 2–3 (1991), 369-417, [doi:10.1016/0550-3213(91)90360-A]

1991 doi
[97]

Fr¨ ohlich and C

J. Fr¨ ohlich and C. King, The Chern-Simons theory and knot polynomials , Commun. Math. Phys. 126 1 (1989), 167-199, [ doi:10.1007/BF02124336], [euclid:cmp/1104179728]

1989
[98]

Fuchs and C

J. Fuchs and C. Schweigert, Symmetry breaking boundaries II. More structures; examples , Nucl. Phys. B 568 (2000), 543-593, [ doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00669-0], [arXiv:hep-th/9908025]

2000 arXiv
[99]

Fuchs and C

J. Fuchs and C. Schweigert, Lie algebra automorphisms in conformal field theory , in: Conference on Infinite Dimensional Lie Theory and Conformal Field Theory (May 2000), [arXiv:math/0011160]

2000 arXiv
[100]

Fulton and J

W. Fulton and J. Harris, Representation Theory: A First Course , Springer (1991), [doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0979-9]

1991 doi
[101]

Funar, Theta functions, root systems and 3-manifold invariants , J

L. Funar, Theta functions, root systems and 3-manifold invariants , J. Geom. Phys. 17 3 (1995), 261-282, [doi:10.1016/0393-0440(94)00050-E]. 70

1995 doi
[102]

Fr¨ ohlich, F

J. Fr¨ ohlich, F. Gabbiani, and P. Marchetti,Braid statistics in three-dimensional local quantum field theory , in: Physics, Geometry and Topology, NATO ASI Series 238, Springer (1990), [doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-3802-8 2]

1990 doi
[103]

Gadbled, A.-L

A. Gadbled, A.-L. Thiel, and E. Wagner, Categorical action of the extended braid group of affine type A, Com- mun. Contemp. Math. 19 03 (2017) 1650024, [ doi:10.1142/S0219199716500243], [arXiv:1504.07596]

2017 arXiv
[104]

Gannon, Modular Data: The Algebraic Combinatorics of Conformal Field Theory , J

T. Gannon, Modular Data: The Algebraic Combinatorics of Conformal Field Theory , J. Algebr. Comb. 22 (2005), 211–250, [ doi:10.1007/s10801-005-2514-2], [arXiv:math/0103044]

2005 arXiv
[105]

Gelca and A

R. Gelca and A. Hamilton, Classical theta functions from a quantum group perspective , New York J. Math. 21 (2015), 93–127, [ nyjm:j/2015/21-4], [arXiv:1209.1135]

2015 arXiv
[106]

Gelca and A

R. Gelca and A. Hamilton, The topological quantum field theory of Riemann ’s theta functions , J. Geom. Phys. 98 (2015), 242-261, [ doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2015.08.008], [arXiv:1406.4269]

2015 arXiv
[107]

Gelca and A

R. Gelca and A. Uribe, From classical theta functions to topological quantum field theory , in: The Influence of Solomon Lefschetz in Geometry and Topology , Contemporary Mathematics 621, AMS (2014), 35-68, [doi:10.1090/conm/621], [arXiv:1006.3252]

2014 arXiv
[108]

Gent, Quantum Computing’s Hard, Cold Reality Check , IEEE Spectrum (Dec

E. Gent, Quantum Computing’s Hard, Cold Reality Check , IEEE Spectrum (Dec. 2023), [spectrum.ieee.org/quantum-computing-skeptics]

2023
[109]

Geroch, Mathematical Physics, University of Chicago Press (1985), [ ISBN:9780226223063], [ark:/13960/t10p8v264]

R. Geroch, Mathematical Physics, University of Chicago Press (1985), [ ISBN:9780226223063], [ark:/13960/t10p8v264]

1985
[110]

P. J. Giblin, Graphs, Surfaces and Homology – An Introduction to Algebraic Topology , Chapman and Hall (1977), [doi:10.1007/978-94-009-5953-8]

1977 doi
[111]

S. G. Gill et al., Quantum Computing: Vision and Challenges , technical report, [ arXiv:2403.02240]

arXiv
[112]

Giotopoulos and H

G. Giotopoulos and H. Sati, Field Theory via Higher Geometry I: Smooth Sets of Fields , J. Geom. Phys. 213 (2025) 105462, [ doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2025.105462], [arXiv:2312.16301]

2025
[113]

Giotopoulos, H

G. Giotopoulos, H. Sati, and U. Schreiber, Super-Flux Quantization on 11d Superspace , J. High Energy Phys. 2024 (2024) 82, [ doi;10.1007/JHEP07(2024)082], [arXiv:2403.16456]

2024 arXiv
[114]

Giotopoulos, H

G. Giotopoulos, H. Sati, and U. Schreiber, Flux Quantization on M5-Branes , J. High Energy Phys. 2024 (2024) 140, [ doi;10.1007/JHEP10(2024)140], [arXiv:2406.11304]

2024 arXiv
[116]

Giuliani, V

A. Giuliani, V. Mastropietro, and M. Porta, Universality of the Hall conductivity in interacting electron systems, Commun. Math. Phys. 349 (2017), 1107–1161, [ doi:10.1007/s00220-016-2714-8], [arXiv:1511.04047]

2017 arXiv
[117]

Glidic, O

P. Glidic, O. Maillet, A. Aassime, C. Piquard, A. Cavanna1, U. Gennser, Y. Jin, A. Anthore, and F. Pierre, Cross-Correlation Investigation of Anyon Statistics in the ν = 1/3 and 2/5 Fractional Quantum Hall States , Phys. Rev. X 13 (2023) 011030, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.13.01103...

2023 arXiv
[118]

Gocho, The topological invariant of three-manifolds based on the U (1) Gauge theory, Proc

T. Gocho, The topological invariant of three-manifolds based on the U (1) Gauge theory, Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci. 66 8 (1990), 237-239, [ doi:10.3792/pjaa.66.237.full], [dml:1195512360]

1990 doi
[119]

Gramain, Le type d’homotopie du groupe des diff´ eomorphismes d’une surface compacte , Ann

A. Gramain, Le type d’homotopie du groupe des diff´ eomorphismes d’une surface compacte , Ann. Scient. l’´Ecole Normale Sup. 6 1 (1973), 53-66, [ doi:10.24033/asens.1242]

1973 doi
[120]

Griffiths, Introduction to Electrodynamics, Cambridge University Press (2023, 2025), [doi:10.1017/9781009397735]

D. Griffiths, Introduction to Electrodynamics, Cambridge University Press (2023, 2025), [doi:10.1017/9781009397735]

2023 doi
[121]

Gromov, E

A. Gromov, E. J. Martinec, and S. Ryu, Collective excitations at filling factor 5/2: The view from superspace, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 077601, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.077601], [arXiv:1909.06384]

2020 arXiv
[122]

Grothendieck, A General Theory of Fibre Spaces With Structure Sheaf , University of Kansas, Report No

A. Grothendieck, A General Theory of Fibre Spaces With Structure Sheaf , University of Kansas, Report No. 4 (1955, 1958), [ ncatlab.org/nlab/files/Grothendieck-FibreSpaces.pdf]

1955
[123]

Grumblin and M

E. Grumblin and M. Horowitz (eds.), Quantum Computing: Progress and Prospects, The National Academies Press (2019), [ doi:10.17226/25196], [ISBN:9780309479691]

2019 doi
[124]

Gwilliam, Remarks on the locality of generalized global symmetries , [arXiv:2504.05626]

O. Gwilliam, Remarks on the locality of generalized global symmetries , [arXiv:2504.05626]

arXiv
[125]

F. D. M. Haldane, Fractional Quantization of the Hall Effect: A Hierarchy of Incompressible Quantum Fluid States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983) 605, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.605]

1983 doi
[126]

Halperin, Statistics of Quasiparticles and the Hierarchy of Fractional Quantized Hall States , Phys

B. Halperin, Statistics of Quasiparticles and the Hierarchy of Fractional Quantized Hall States , Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 (1984) 1583, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.1583]. 71

1984 doi
[127]

H. Halvorson, Algebraic Quantum Field Theory , in: Philosophy of Physics, Handbook of the Philosophy of Science (2007) 731-864 [ doi:10.1016/B978-044451560-5/50011-7], [arXiv:math-ph/0602036]

2007 arXiv
[128]

V. L. Hansen, On the Space of Maps of a Closed Surface into the 2-Sphere , Math. Scand. 35 (1974), 149-158, [doi:10.7146/math.scand.a-11542], [jstor:24490694]

1974 doi
[129]

Harcos, The reciprocity of Gauss sums via the residue theorem , [ncatlab.org/nlab/files/Harcos-ReciprocityOfGaussSums.pdf]

G. Harcos, The reciprocity of Gauss sums via the residue theorem , [ncatlab.org/nlab/files/Harcos-ReciprocityOfGaussSums.pdf]
[130]

J. B. Hartle and J. R. Taylor, Quantum Mechanics of Paraparticles , Phys. Rev. 178 (1969) 2043, [doi:10.1103/PhysRev.178.2043]

1969 doi
[131]

Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Cambridge University Press (2002), [ ISBN:9780521795401]

A. Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Cambridge University Press (2002), [ ISBN:9780521795401]

2002
[132]

Henneaux and C

M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, Quantization of Gauge Systems , Princeton University Press (1992), [doi:10.2307/j.ctv10crg0r]

1992 doi
[133]

Heunen and J

C. Heunen and J. Vicary, Categories for Quantum Theory , Oxford University Press (2019), [ISBN:9780198739616]

2019
[134]

Hristova, Frobenius Reciprocity for Topological Groups, Commun

K. Hristova, Frobenius Reciprocity for Topological Groups, Commun. Algebra 47 5 (2019), [doi:10.1080/00927872.2018.1529773], [arXiv:1801.00871]

2019
[135]

C.-L. Ho, A. I. Solomon and C.-H. Oh, Quantum entanglement, unitary braid representation and Temperley- Lieb algebra, EPL 92 (2010) 30002, [ doi:10.1209/0295-5075/92/30002], [arXiv:1011.6229]

2010 arXiv
[136]

Hoefler, T

T. Hoefler, T. Haener, and M. Troyer, Disentangling Hype from Practicality: On Realistically Achieving Quantum Advantage, Commun. ACM 66 5 (2023), 82-87, [ doi:10.1145/3571725], [arXiv:2307.00523]

2023 arXiv
[137]

L. Hu, Z. Liu, and W. Zhu, Modular transformation and anyonic statistics of multi-component fractional quantum Hall states , Phys. Rev. B 108 (2023) 235121, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.108.235121], [arXiv:2301.06427]

2023 arXiv
[138]

Hu, Concerning the homotopy groups of the components of the mapping space Y Sp , Indagationes Math

S.-T. Hu, Concerning the homotopy groups of the components of the mapping space Y Sp , Indagationes Math. 8 (1946), 623-629, [ dwc.knaw.nl/DL/publications/PU00018263.pdf]

1946
[139]

Hu, Homotopy Theory, Academic Press (1959), [https://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~v1ranick/papers/hu2.pdf]

S.-T. Hu, Homotopy Theory, Academic Press (1959), [https://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~v1ranick/papers/hu2.pdf]

1959
[140]

Husem¨ oller,Fibre bundles , Springer (1966, 1975, 1994), [ doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2261-1]

D. Husem¨ oller,Fibre bundles , Springer (1966, 1975, 1994), [ doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2261-1]

1966 doi
[141]

Ibort and M

A. Ibort and M. A. Rodriguez, An Introduction to Groups, Groupoids and Their Representations, CRC Press (2021), [ISBN:9781032086767], [doi:10.1201/b22019]

2021 doi
[142]

Iengo and K

R. Iengo and K. Lechner, Anyon quantum mechanics and Chern-Simons theory , Phys. Rept. 213 4 (1992), 179-269, [doi:10.1016/0370-1573(92)90039-3]

1992 doi
[143]

Ikeda, Homological and Monodromy Representations of Framed Braid Groups , Commun

A. Ikeda, Homological and Monodromy Representations of Framed Braid Groups , Commun. Math. Phys. 359 (2018), 1091–1121, [ doi:10.1007/s00220-017-3036-1], [arXiv:1702.03918]

2018 arXiv
[144]

I. M. Isaacs, Character theory of finite groups , Academic Press, New York (1976), [ISBN:978-0-8218-4229-4]

1976
[145]

N. V. Ivanov, Mapping class groups , in: Handbook of Geometric Topology, North-Holland (2002), 523-633, [doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-82432-5.X5000-8]

2002 doi
[146]

J. K. Jain, Composite-fermion approach for the fractional quantum Hall effect , Phys. Rev. Lett. 63 (1989) 199, [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.199]

1989 doi
[147]

J. K. Jain, Microscopic theory of the fractional quantum Hall effect , Adv. Phys. 41 (1992), 105-146, [doi:10.1080/00018739200101483]

1992 doi
[148]

J. K. Jain, Composite Fermions, Cambridge University Press (2007), [ doi:10.1017/CBO9780511607561]

2007 doi
[149]

J. K. Jain, A note contrasting two microscopic theories of the fractional quantum Hall effect , Indian J. Phys. 88 (2014), 915-929, [ doi:10.1007/s12648-014-0491-9], [arXiv:1403.5415]

2014 arXiv
[150]

J. K. Jain, Thirty Years of Composite Fermions and Beyond , chapter 1 in: Fractional Quantum Hall Effects – New Developments , World Scientific (2020), [ doi:10.1142/11751], [arXiv:2011.13488]

2020 arXiv
[151]

I. M. James, General Topology and Homotopy Theory, Springer (1984), [doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-8283-6]

1984 doi
[152]

G. D. James and A. Kerber, The Representation Theory of the Symmetric Group , Cambridge University Press (1984), [ doi:10.1017/CBO9781107340732]

1984 doi
[153]

Jeckelmann and B

B. Jeckelmann and B. Jeanneret, The Quantum Hall Effect as an Electrical Resistance Standard , in: The Quantum Hall Effect – Poincar´ e Seminar 2004, Progress in Mathematical Physics 45, Birkh¨ auser (2005), 55-131, [doi:10.1007/3-7643-7393-8 3]

2005 doi
[154]

S. P. Jordan, Quantum Computation Beyond the Circuit Model, PhD thesis, MIT (2010), [arXiv:0809.2307]. 72

2010 arXiv
[155]

S. P. Jordan, Permutational Quantum Computing , Quantum Information and Computation 10 (2010) 470, [doi:10.26421/QIC10.5-6-7], [arXiv:0906.2508]

2010 arXiv
[156]

Kak, Prospects for Quantum Computing , talk at CIF AR Nanotechnology program meeting, Halifax (November 2008), [arXiv:0902.4884]

S. Kak, Prospects for Quantum Computing , talk at CIF AR Nanotechnology program meeting, Halifax (November 2008), [arXiv:0902.4884]

2008 arXiv
[157]

S. Kallel, Configuration Spaces and the Topology of Curves in Projective Space, in: Topology, Geometry, and Algebra: Interactions and new directions , Contemporary Mathematics 279, AMS (2001), 151–175, [doi:10.1090/conm/279], [arXiv:math-ph/0003010]

2001 arXiv
[158]

Kallel, Configuration spaces of points: A user’s guide , Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics 2nd ed

S. Kallel, Configuration spaces of points: A user’s guide , Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics 2nd ed. (2024), [doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-95703-8.00211-1], [arXiv:2407.11092]

2024 arXiv
[159]

Kao, Representations of the Symmetric Group , VIGRE presentation (2010), [ncatlab.org/nlab/files/Kao-SymRep.pdf]

D. Kao, Representations of the Symmetric Group , VIGRE presentation (2010), [ncatlab.org/nlab/files/Kao-SymRep.pdf]

2010
[160]

L. H. Kauffman, Quantum Topology and Quantum Computing , in: Quantum Computation: A Grand Math- ematical Challenge for the Twenty-First Century and the Millennium , Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics 58, AMS (2002), [ doi:10.1090/psapm/058]

2002 doi
[161]

L. H. Kauffman, S. J. Lomonaco, Braiding Operators are Universal Quantum Gates , New J. Phys. 6 (2004), [doi:10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/134], [arXiv:quant-ph/0401090]

2004 arXiv
[162]

L. H. Kauffman, Majorana Fermions and Representations of the Braid Group , Int. J. Modern Phys. A 33 23 (2018) 1830023, [ doi:10.1142/S0217751X18300235], [arXiv:1710.04650]

2018 arXiv
[163]

R. P. Kent and D. Pfeifer, A Geometric and algebraic description of annular braid groups , Int. J. Algebra Comput. 12 01n02 (2002), 85-97, [ doi:10.1142/S0218196702000997]

2002 doi
[164]

Y. Kim, D. J. Clarke, and R. M. Lutchyn, Coulomb Blockade in Fractional Topological Superconductors , Phys. Rev. B 96 (2017) 041123, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.041123], [arXiv:1703.00498]

2017 arXiv
[165]

Kirillov, An Introduction to Lie Groups and Lie Algebras , Cambridge University Press (2008), [doi:10.1017/CBO9780511755156]

A. Kirillov, An Introduction to Lie Groups and Lie Algebras , Cambridge University Press (2008), [doi:10.1017/CBO9780511755156]

2008 doi
[166]

Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons , Ann

A. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons , Ann. Phys. 303 (2003), 2-30, [doi:10.1016/S0003-4916(02)00018-0], [arXiv:quant-ph/9707021]

2003 arXiv
[167]

Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond , Ann

A. Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond , Ann. Phys. 321 1 (2006), 2-111, [doi:10.1016/j.aop.2005.10.005]

2006 doi
[168]

Kitaev, Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires , Phys

A. Kitaev, Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires , Phys. Uspekhi, 44 10S (2001), 131-136, [doi:10.1070/1063-7869/44/10S/S29], [arXiv:cond-mat/0010440]

2001 arXiv
[169]

Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics , Wiley (1953-), [ ISBN:978-0-471-41526-8]

C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics , Wiley (1953-), [ ISBN:978-0-471-41526-8]

1953
[170]

A. W. Knapp, Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction , Progress in Mathematics 140 (1996, 2002), [ISBN:9780817642594]

1996
[171]

K. H. Ko and L. Smolinsky, The framed braid group and 3-manifolds , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 115 (1992), 541-551, [doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-1992-1126197-1]

1992 doi
[172]

Koecher and A

M. Koecher and A. Krieg, Elliptische Funktionen und Modulformen , Springer (2007), [doi:10.1007/978-3-540-49325-9]

2007 doi
[173]

S. S. Koh, Note on the properties of the components of the mapping spaces X Sp , Proc. of the AMS 11 (1960), 896-904, [ncatlab.org/nlab/files/Koh-MappingSpace.pdf]

1960
[174]

Kokkinakis, Framed Braid Equivalences, [arXiv:2503.05342]

A. Kokkinakis, Framed Braid Equivalences, [arXiv:2503.05342]

arXiv
[175]

Kong and Z.-H

L. Kong and Z.-H. Zhang, An invitation to topological orders and category theory , [arXiv:2205.05565]

arXiv
[176]

Kosinski, Differential manifolds, Academic Press (1993), [ ISBN:978-0-12-421850-5]

A. Kosinski, Differential manifolds, Academic Press (1993), [ ISBN:978-0-12-421850-5]

1993
[177]

Kr¨ omer, Tool and object: A history and philosophy of category theory , Science Networks

R. Kr¨ omer, Tool and object: A history and philosophy of category theory , Science Networks. Historical Studies 32 (2007), [doi:10.1007/978-3-7643-7524-9]

2007 doi
[178]

H. K. Kundu et al., Anyonic interference and braiding phase in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer , Nature Physics 19 (2023), 515–521, [ doi:10.1038/s41567-022-01899-z], [arXiv:2203.04205]

2023 arXiv
[179]

Lang, Algebraic number theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 110, Springer (1970, 1994), [doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0853-2]

S. Lang, Algebraic number theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 110, Springer (1970, 1994), [doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0853-2]

1970 doi
[180]

L. L. Larmore and E. Thomas, On the Fundamental Group of a Space of Sections , Math. Scand. 47 2 (1980), 232-246, [jstor:24491393]

1980
[181]

J. W. Z. Lau, K. H. Lim, H. Shrotriya, and L. C. Kwek, NISQ computing: where are we and where do we go?, AAPPS Bull. 32 (2022) 27, [ doi:10.1007/s43673-022-00058-z]

2022 doi
[182]

Lechner, U

G. Lechner, U. Pennig, and S. Wood, Yang-Baxter representations of the infinite symmetric group , Adv. Math. 355 (2019) 106769, [ doi:10.1016/j.aim.2019.106769], [arXiv:1707.00196]. 73

2019
[183]

S. T. Lee and J. A. Packer, The Cohomology of the Integer Heisenberg Groups , J. Algebra 184 1 (1996), 230-250, [doi:10.1006/jabr.1996.0258]

1996
[184]

D. A. Lidar and T. A. Brun (eds.), Quantum Error Correction, Cambridge University Press (2013), [ISBN:9780521897877], [doi:10.1017/CBO9781139034807]

2013 doi
[185]

N. H. Lindner, E. Berg, G. Refael, and A. Stern, Fractionalizing Majorana Fermions: Non-Abelian Statis- tics on the Edges of Abelian Quantum Hall States , Phys. Rev. X 2 (2012) 041002, [ arXiv:1204.5733], [doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.2.041002]

2012 arXiv
[186]

P. Lunt, P. Hill, J. Reiter, P. M. Preiss, M. Ga lka, and S. Jochim, Realization of a Laughlin state of two rapidly rotating fermions , Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 253401, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.253401], [arXiv:2402.14814]

2024 arXiv
[187]

MacLane, Categories for the Working Mathematician , Graduate Texts in Mathematics 5, second ed., Springer (1997), [ doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-4721-8]

S. MacLane, Categories for the Working Mathematician , Graduate Texts in Mathematics 5, second ed., Springer (1997), [ doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-4721-8]

1997 doi
[188]

Manoliu, Abelian Chern-Simons theory, J

M. Manoliu, Abelian Chern-Simons theory, J. Math. Phys. 39 (1998), 170-206, [ arXiv:dg-ga/9610001], [doi:10.1063/1.532333]

1998 arXiv
[189]

Manton and P

N. Manton and P. Sutcliffe, Topological Solitons, Cambridge University Press (2004) [doi:10.1017/CBO9780511617034]

2004 doi
[190]

Marquis, What is Category Theory? , in What is Category Theory? , Polimetrica (2006), 221-256, [ncatlab.org/nlab/files/Marquis-CategoryTheory.pdf]

J.-P. Marquis, What is Category Theory? , in What is Category Theory? , Polimetrica (2006), 221-256, [ncatlab.org/nlab/files/Marquis-CategoryTheory.pdf]

2006
[191]

Massuyeau, Lectures on Mapping Class Groups, Braid Groups and Formality , lecture notes (2021), [massuyea.perso.math.cnrs.fr/notes/formality.pdf]

G. Massuyeau, Lectures on Mapping Class Groups, Braid Groups and Formality , lecture notes (2021), [massuyea.perso.math.cnrs.fr/notes/formality.pdf]

2021
[192]

C. R. F. Maunder, The spectral sequence of an extraordinary cohomology theory , Math. Proc. Cambridge Philosophical Soc. 59 3 (1963), 567-574, [ doi:10.1017/S0305004100037245]

1963 doi
[193]

McDuff, Configuration spaces of positive and negative particles , Topology 14 1 (1975), 91-107, [doi:10.1016/0040-9383(75)90038-5]

D. McDuff, Configuration spaces of positive and negative particles , Topology 14 1 (1975), 91-107, [doi:10.1016/0040-9383(75)90038-5]

1975 doi
[194]

Melvin and N

P. Melvin and N. B. Tufillaro, Templates and framed braids, Phys. Rev. A 44 (1991) R3419(R), [doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.44.R3419]

1991 doi
[195]

N. D. Mermin, The topological theory of defects in ordered media , Rev. Mod. Phys. 51 (1979) 591, [doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.51.591]

1979 doi
[196]

Mezei, S

M. Mezei, S. S. Pufu, and Y. Wang, Chern-Simons theory from M5-branes and calibrated M2-branes, J. High Energ. Phys. 2019 (2019) 165, [ doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2019)165], [arXiv:1812.07572]

2019 arXiv
[197]

Microsoft Quantum, Roadmap to fault tolerant quantum computation using topological qubit arrays , [arXiv:2502.12252]

arXiv
[198]

Milnor: Spin Structures on Manifolds , L’Enseignement Math´ ematique9 (1963), 198-203, [doi:10.5169/seals-38784]

J. Milnor: Spin Structures on Manifolds , L’Enseignement Math´ ematique9 (1963), 198-203, [doi:10.5169/seals-38784]

1963 doi
[199]

Mong, et al., Universal Topological Quantum Computation from a Superconductor-Abelian Quantum Hall Heterostructure, Phys

R. Mong, et al., Universal Topological Quantum Computation from a Superconductor-Abelian Quantum Hall Heterostructure, Phys. Rev. X 4 (2014) 011036, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.4.011036], [arXiv:1307.4403]

2014 arXiv
[200]

Morava, A homotopy-theoretic context for CKM/Birkhoff renormalization , [arXiv:2307.10148]

J. Morava, A homotopy-theoretic context for CKM/Birkhoff renormalization , [arXiv:2307.10148]

arXiv
[201]

Morava, Some very low-dimensional algebraic topology , [arXiv:2411.15885]

J. Morava, Some very low-dimensional algebraic topology , [arXiv:2411.15885]

arXiv
[202]

Morava and D

J. Morava and D. Rolfsen, Toward the group completion of the Burau representation , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 376 (2023), 1845-1865, [ doi:10.1090/tran/8796], [arXiv:1809.01994]

2023 arXiv
[203]

Moore and N

G. Moore and N. Read, Nonabelions in the fractional quantum Hall effect , Nucl. Phys. B 360 (1991) 362, [doi:10.1016/0550-3213(91)90407-O]

1991 doi
[204]

Morita, Introduction to mapping class groups of surfaces and related groups , in: Handbook of Teichm¨ uller theory, Volume I, EMS (2007), 353-386, [ doi:10.4171/029-1/8]

S. Morita, Introduction to mapping class groups of surfaces and related groups , in: Handbook of Teichm¨ uller theory, Volume I, EMS (2007), 353-386, [ doi:10.4171/029-1/8]

2007 doi
[205]

J. C. Morton, Extended TQFT, Gauge Theory, And 2-Linearization , J. Homotopy Relat. Struct. 10 (2015), 127–187, [doi:10.1007/s40062-013-0047-2], [arXiv:1003.5603]

2015 arXiv
[206]

D. J. Myers, H. Sati, and U. Schreiber, Topological Quantum Gates in Homotopy Type Theory , Commun. Math. Phys. 405 (2024) 172, [ doi;10.1007/s00220-024-05020-8]

2024 doi
[207]

Nakamura, S

J. Nakamura, S. Fallahi, H. Sahasrabudhe, R. Rahman, S. Liang, G. C. Gardner, and M. J. Manfra, Aharonov–Bohm interference of fractional quantum Hall edge modes , Nature Phys. 15 (2019), 563–569, [doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0441-8], [arXiv:1901.08452]

2019 arXiv
[208]

Nakamura, S

J. Nakamura, S. Liang, G. C. Gardner, and M. J. Manfra, Direct observation of anyonic braiding statistics , Nature Phys. 16 (2020), 931–936, [ doi:10.1038/s41567-020-1019-1], [arXiv:2006.14115]. 74

2020 arXiv
[209]

Nakamura1, S

J. Nakamura1, S. Liang, G. C. Gardner, and M. J. Manfra, Fabry-Perot interferometry at the ν = 2 /5 fractional quantum Hall state , Phys. Rev. X 13 (2023) 041012, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041012], [arXiv:2304.12415]

2023 arXiv
[210]

Nayak, S

C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-Abelian Anyons and Topological Quantum Computation , Rev. Mod. Phys. 80 1083 (2008), [ doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.80.1083], [arXiv:0707.1889]

2008 arXiv
[211]

M. A. Nielsen, I. L. Chuang, Quantum computation and quantum information , Cambridge University Press (2000), [doi:10.1017/CBO9780511976667]

2000 doi
[212]

Nikolaus, U

T. Nikolaus, U. Schreiber, and D. Stevenson, Principal ∞-bundles – General Theory , J. Homotopy Related Str. 10 4 (2015), 749-801, [ doi:10.1007/s40062-014-0083-6], [arXiv:1207.0248]

2015 arXiv
[213]

nLab, induced representation, [ncatlab.org/nlab/show/induced+representation]
[214]

Ohtsuki, Quantum Invariants – A Study of Knots, 3-Manifolds, and Their Sets , World Scientific (2001), [doi:10.1142/4746]

T. Ohtsuki, Quantum Invariants – A Study of Knots, 3-Manifolds, and Their Sets , World Scientific (2001), [doi:10.1142/4746]

2001 doi
[215]

Okuyama, The space of intervals in a Euclidean space , Algebr

S. Okuyama, The space of intervals in a Euclidean space , Algebr. Geom. Topol. 5 (2005), 1555-1572, [doi:10.2140/agt.2005.5.1555], [arXiv:math/0511645]

2005 arXiv
[216]

Papi´ c and A

Z. Papi´ c and A. C. Balram, Fractional quantum Hall effect in semiconductor systems , Encyclopedia of Condensed Matter Physics 2nd ed. 1 (2024), 285-307, [ doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-90800-9.00007-X], [arXiv:2205.03421]

2024 arXiv
[217]

A. M. Polyakov, Fermi-Bose transmutation induced by gauge fields , Mod. Phys. Lett. A 03 03 (1988), 325- 328, [doi:10.1142/S0217732388000398]

1988 doi
[218]

A. P. Polychronakos, Abelian Chern-Simons theories in 2+1 dimensions , Ann. Phys. 203 2 (1990), 231-254, [doi:10.1016/0003-4916(90)90171-J]

1990 doi
[219]

A. P. Polychronakos, Path Integrals and Parastatistics , Nucl. Phys. B 474 (1996), 529-539, [doi:10.1016/0550-3213(96)00277-5], [arXiv:hep-th/9603179]

1996 arXiv
[220]

L. Pontrjagin, Classification of continuous maps of a complex into a sphere, Communication I , Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 19 3 (1938), 147-149; in collected works, [ doi:10.1201/9780367813758]

1938 doi
[221]

R. E. Prange, S. M. Girvin (eds.), The Quantum Hall Effect , Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics, Springer (1986, 1990), [ doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3350-3]

1986 doi
[222]

Prasad, An easy proof of the Stone-von Neumann-Mackey theorem , Expositiones Math

A. Prasad, An easy proof of the Stone-von Neumann-Mackey theorem , Expositiones Math. 29 (2011), 110- 118, [doi:10.1016/j.exmath.2010.06.001], [arXiv:0912.0574]

2011 arXiv
[223]

Preskill, Crossing the Quantum Chasm: From NISQ to Fault Tolerance , talk at Q2B 2023, Silicon Valley (2023), [ncatlab.org/nlab/files/Preskill-Crossing.pdf]

J. Preskill, Crossing the Quantum Chasm: From NISQ to Fault Tolerance , talk at Q2B 2023, Silicon Valley (2023), [ncatlab.org/nlab/files/Preskill-Crossing.pdf]

2023
[224]

Preskill, Beyond NISQ: The Megaquop Machine , talk at Q2B 2024 Silicon Valley (Dec

J. Preskill, Beyond NISQ: The Megaquop Machine , talk at Q2B 2024 Silicon Valley (Dec. 2024), [www.preskill.caltech.edu/talks/Preskill-Q2B-2024.pdf]

2024
[225]

Pressley and G

A. Pressley and G. Segal, Loop groups, Oxford University Press (1988), [ ISBN:9780198535614]

1988
[226]

S. Pu, A. C. Balram, M. Fremling, A. Gromov, and Z. Papi´ c, Signatures of Supersymmetry in the ν = 5/2 Fractional Quantum Hall Effect , Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 176501, [ arXiv:2301.04169], [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.176501]

2023 arXiv
[227]

E. Radu, D. H. Tchrakian and Y. Yang, Abelian Hopfions of the CPn model on R2n+1 and a fractionally powered topological lower bound, Nuclear Physics B 875 2 (2013) 388-407 [ arXiv:1305.4784], [doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2013.07.006]

2013 arXiv
[228]

Ram Murty and S

M. Ram Murty and S. Pathak, Evaluation of the quadratic Gauss sum , The Math. Student 86 1-2 (2017), 139-150, [ncatlab.org/nlab/files/RamMurtyPathak-GaussSum.pdf]

2017
[229]

Regnault and Th

N. Regnault and Th. Jolicoeur, Quantum Hall Fractions in Rotating Bose-Einstein Condensates , Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 030402, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.030402]

2003 doi
[230]

Regnault and Th

N. Regnault and Th. Jolicoeur, Quantum Hall fractions for spinless bosons , Phys. Rev. B 69 (2004) 235309, [doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.69.235309]

2004 doi
[231]

Romaidis, Mapping class group actions and their applications to 3D gravity , PhD thesis, Hamburg (2022), [ediss:9945]

I. Romaidis, Mapping class group actions and their applications to 3D gravity , PhD thesis, Hamburg (2022), [ediss:9945]

2022
[232]

Romaidis and I

I. Romaidis and I. Runkel, CFT correlators and mapping class group averages , Commun. Math. Phys. 405 (2024) 247, [ doi:10.1007/s00220-024-05111-6], [arXiv:2309.14000]

2024 arXiv
[233]

E. C. Rowell, An Invitation to the Mathematics of Topological Quantum Computation , J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 698 (2016) 012012, [ doi:10.1088/1742-6596/698/1/012012]

2016 doi
[234]

E. C. Rowell, Braids, Motions and Topological Quantum Computing , [arXiv:2208.11762]. 75

arXiv
[235]

E. C. Rowell and Z. Wang, Mathematics of Topological Quantum Computing , Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 55 (2018), 183-238, [ doi:10.1090/bull/1605], [arXiv:1705.06206]

2018 arXiv
[236]

Rudolph and M

G. Rudolph and M. Schmidt, Differential Geometry and Mathematical Physics Part II. Fibre Bundles, Topology and Gauge Fields , Springer (2017), [ doi:10.1007/978-94-024-0959-8]

2017 doi
[237]

Ruelle et al., Comparing fractional quantum Hall Laughlin and Jain topological orders with the anyon collider, Phys

M. Ruelle et al., Comparing fractional quantum Hall Laughlin and Jain topological orders with the anyon collider, Phys. Rev. X 13 (2023) 011031, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011031], [arXiv:2210.01066]

2023 arXiv
[238]

N. L. Samuelson, L. A. Cohen, W. Wang, S. Blanch, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. P. Zaletel, and A. F. Young, Anyonic statistics and slow quasiparticle dynamics in a graphene fractional quantum Hall interferometer [arXiv:2403.19628]

arXiv
[239]

L. H. Santos, Parafermions in Hierarchical Fractional Quantum Hall States , Phys. Rev. Research 2 (2020) 013232, [doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013232], [arXiv:1906.07188]

2020 arXiv
[240]

L. H. Santos and T. L. Hughes, Parafermionic Wires at the Interface of Chiral Topological States , Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2019) 136801, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.136801]

2019 doi
[241]

Sati, Framed M-branes, corners, and topological invariants, J

H. Sati, Framed M-branes, corners, and topological invariants, J. Math. Phys. 59 (2018) 062304, [doi:10.1063/1.5007185], [arXiv:1310.1060]

2018 arXiv
[242]

Sati and U

H. Sati and U. Schreiber, Equivariant Cohomotopy implies orientifold tadpole cancellation , J. Geom. Phys. 156 (2020) 103775, [ doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2020.103775], [arXiv:1909.12277]

2020
[243]

Sati and U

H. Sati and U. Schreiber, Differential Cohomotopy implies intersecting brane observables via configuration spaces and chord diagrams , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 26 4 (2022), 957-1051, [ arXiv:1912.10425], [doi:10.4310/ATMP.2022.v26.n4.a4]

2022 arXiv
[244]

Sati and U

H. Sati and U. Schreiber, Anyonic topological order in TED K-theory , Rev. Math. Phys. 35 03 (2023) 2350001, [doi:10.1142/S0129055X23500010], [arXiv:2206.13563]

2023 arXiv
[245]

Sati and U

H. Sati and U. Schreiber, The Quantum Monadology , Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations (2025, in press), [ arXiv:2310.15735]

2025
[246]

Sati and U

H. Sati and U. Schreiber, Entanglement of Sections , [arXiv:2309.07245]

arXiv
[247]

Sati and U

H. Sati and U. Schreiber, Quantum and Reality , [arXiv:2311.11035]

arXiv
[248]

Sati and U

H. Sati and U. Schreiber, Flux Quantization on Phase Space , Ann. Henri Poincar´ e26 (2025), 895–919, [doi:10.1007/s00023-024-01438-x], [arXiv:2312.12517]

2025 arXiv
[249]

Sati and U

H. Sati and U. Schreiber, Quantum Observables of Quantized Fluxes , Ann. Henri Poincar´ e (2024), [doi:10.1007/s00023-024-01517-z], [arXiv:2312.13037]

2024 arXiv
[250]

Sati and U

H. Sati and U. Schreiber, Abelian Anyons on Flux-Quantized M5-Branes , [arXiv:2408.11896]

arXiv
[251]

Sati and U

H. Sati and U. Schreiber, Flux Quantization , Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics 2nd ed. 4 Elsevier (2025), 281-324, [ doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-95703-8.00078-1]

2025 doi
[252]

Sati and U

H. Sati and U. Schreiber, Anyons on M5-Probes of Seifert 3-Orbifolds via Flux-Quantization , Lett. Math. Phys. 115 36 (2025), [ doi:10.1007/s11005-025-01918-z], [arXiv:2411.16852]

2025 arXiv
[253]

Sati and U

H. Sati and U. Schreiber: Topological QBits in Flux-Quantized Supergravity, in Quantum Gravity and Com- putation Routledge (2025) [ arXiv:2411.00628], [ISBN:9781032900940]

2025
[254]

Sati and U

H. Sati and U. Schreiber, The Character Map in Twisted Equivariant Nonabelian Cohomology , in: Applied Algebraic Topology, Beijing J. Pure Appl. Math., special issue (2025, in print), [ arXiv:2011.06533]

2025
[255]

Sati and U

H. Sati and U. Schreiber: Geometric Orbifold Cohomology , CRC Press (2026, to appear) [arXiv:2008.01101]

2026 arXiv
[256]

Sati and U

H. Sati and U. Schreiber, Equivariant Principal ∞-Bundles, Cambridge University Press (2025, in press), [arXiv:2112.13654]

2025 arXiv
[257]

Sati and U

H. Sati and U. Schreiber, Higher Gauge Theory and Nonabelian Differential Cohomology — an exposition , commissioned for: Fundamental Structures in Computational and Pure Mathematics, Trends in Mathematics, Birkh¨ auser (2025, to appear), [ncatlab.org/schreiber/show/Exposition+...

2025
[258]

Sati and U

H. Sati and U. Schreiber, Engineering of Anyons on M5-Probes via Flux Quantization , SciPost Physics Lecture Notes (2025), [ arXiv:2501.17927]

2025 arXiv
[259]

Sati and U

H. Sati and U. Schreiber, Identifying Anyonic Topological Order in Fractional Quantum Anomalous Hall Systems [arXiv:2507.00138]
[260]

Sati and S

H. Sati and S. Valera, Topological Quantum Computing, Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics 2nd ed., 4 (2025), 325-345, [ doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-95703-8.00262-7]

2025 doi
[261]

Sau, A Roadmap for a Scalable Topological Quantum Computer , Physics 10 68 (2017), [physics.aps.org/articles/v10/68]

S. Sau, A Roadmap for a Scalable Topological Quantum Computer , Physics 10 68 (2017), [physics.aps.org/articles/v10/68]. 76

2017
[262]

Schreiber, Quantization via Linear homotopy types , talk notes (2014), [ arXiv:1402.7041]

U. Schreiber, Quantization via Linear homotopy types , talk notes (2014), [ arXiv:1402.7041]

2014 arXiv
[263]

U. Schreiber, Categories and Toposes, lecture series at Modern Mathematics Methods in Physics – Diffeology, Categories and Toposes and Non-commutative Geometry Summer School, Nesin Mathematics Village (2018), [ncatlab.org/schreiber/show/Categories+and+Toposes]

2018
[264]

M. Schaar, M´ emoire sur la th´ eorie des r´ esidus biquadratiques, M´ emoires de l’Acad’emie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux-Arts de Belgique 24 (1850), [biodiversitylibrary:20728]
[265]

Schreiber, Higher Topos Theory in Physics , Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics 2nd ed

U. Schreiber, Higher Topos Theory in Physics , Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics 2nd ed. 4 (2025), 62-76, [doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-95703-8.00210-X]

2025 doi
[266]

Schweigert, Introduction to conformal field theory , lecture notes (2013/14), [www.math.uni-hamburg.de/home/schweigert/skripten/cftskript.pdf]

C. Schweigert, Introduction to conformal field theory , lecture notes (2013/14), [www.math.uni-hamburg.de/home/schweigert/skripten/cftskript.pdf]

2013
[267]

Serre, A Course in Arithmetic , Graduate Texts in Mathematics 7, Springer (1973), [doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-9884-4]

J.-P. Serre, A Course in Arithmetic , Graduate Texts in Mathematics 7, Springer (1973), [doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-9884-4]

1973 doi
[268]

Serre, Linear Representations of Finite Groups , Graduate Texts in Mathematics 42, Springer (1977), [doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-9458-7]

J.-P. Serre, Linear Representations of Finite Groups , Graduate Texts in Mathematics 42, Springer (1977), [doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-9458-7]

1977 doi
[269]

Serre, Trees, Springer (1980), [ doi:10.1007/978-3-642-61856-7]

J.-P. Serre, Trees, Springer (1980), [ doi:10.1007/978-3-642-61856-7]

1980 doi
[270]

S. H. Simon, Topological Quantum, Oxford University Press (2023), [ ISBN:9780198886723]

2023
[271]

S. H. Simon, E. H. Rezayi, N. R. Cooper, and I. Berdnikov.Construction of a paired wave function for spinless electrons at filling fraction ν = 2/5, Phys. Rev. B 75 (2007) 075317, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.75.075317]

2007 doi
[272]

Smale, Diffeomorphisms of the 2-sphere , Proc

S. Smale, Diffeomorphisms of the 2-sphere , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 10 (1959) 621–626, [ jstor:2033664], [doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-1959-0112149-8]

1959 doi
[273]

Spanier, Borsuk’s Cohomotopy Groups , Ann

E. Spanier, Borsuk’s Cohomotopy Groups , Ann. Math. 50 1 (1949), 203-245, [ jstor:1969362]

1949
[274]

Stern, Anyons and the quantum Hall effect – A pedagogical review , Ann

A. Stern, Anyons and the quantum Hall effect – A pedagogical review , Ann. Phys. 323 1 (2008), 204-249, [doi:10.1016/j.aop.2007.10.008], [arXiv:0711.4697]

2008 arXiv
[275]

H. L. St¨ ormer,Nobel Lecture: The fractional quantum Hall effect , Rev. Mod. Phys. 71 (1999) 875, [doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.71.875]

1999 doi
[276]

Strom, Modern classical homotopy theory, Graduate Studies in Mathematics 127, American Mathematical Society (2011), [ ams:gsm/127]

J. Strom, Modern classical homotopy theory, Graduate Studies in Mathematics 127, American Mathematical Society (2011), [ ams:gsm/127]

2011
[277]

Strominger, Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory , Princeton University Press (2018), [ISBN:9780691179506], [arXiv:1703.05448]

A. Strominger, Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory , Princeton University Press (2018), [ISBN:9780691179506], [arXiv:1703.05448]

2018 arXiv
[278]

Szamuely, Galois groups and fundamental groups , Cambridge Stud

T. Szamuely, Galois groups and fundamental groups , Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math. 117, Cambridge Univer- sity Press, (2009), [ doi:10.1017/CBO9780511627064]

2009 doi
[279]

Tan, Smallest nonabelian quotients of surface braid groups , Algebr

C. Tan, Smallest nonabelian quotients of surface braid groups , Algebr. Geom. Topol. 24 (2024), 3997-4006, [doi:10.2140/agt.2024.24.3997], [arXiv:2301.01872]

2024 arXiv
[280]

Y. H. Tham, On the Category of Boundary Values in the Extended Crane-Yetter TQFT , PhD thesis, Stony Brook (2021), [ arXiv:2108.13467]

2021 arXiv
[281]

Tolar, On Clifford groups in quantum computing , J

J. Tolar, On Clifford groups in quantum computing , J. Phys.: Conf. Series 1071 (2018) 012022, [doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1071/1/012022], [arXiv:1810.10259]

2018 arXiv
[282]

Tong, The Quantum Hall Effect , lecture notes (2016), [ arXiv:1606.06687], [www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/qhe/qhe.pdf]

D. Tong, The Quantum Hall Effect , lecture notes (2016), [ arXiv:1606.06687], [www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/qhe/qhe.pdf]

2016 arXiv
[283]

H. Q. Trung and B. Yang, Fractionalisation and dynamics of anyons at ν = n = 1/3 in fractional quantum Hall effect and their experimental signatures , Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 046402, [ arXiv:2009.14214], [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.046402]

2021 arXiv
[284]

Ustinov, A Short Proof of the Landsberg–Schaar Identity , Math

A. Ustinov, A Short Proof of the Landsberg–Schaar Identity , Math. Notes 112 (2022), 488–490, [doi:10.1134/S0001434622090188]

2022 doi
[285]

Vaezi, Fractional topological superconductor with fractionalized Majorana fermions , Phys

A. Vaezi, Fractional topological superconductor with fractionalized Majorana fermions , Phys. Rev. B 87 (2013) 035132, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.87.035132], [arXiv:1204.6245]

2013 arXiv
[286]

Veillon, C

A. Veillon, C. Piquard, P. Glidic, Y. Sato, A. Aassime, A. Cavanna, Y. Jin, U. Gennser, A. Anthore, and F. Pierre, Observation of the scaling dimension of fractional quantum Hall anyons , Nature 632 (2024), 517–521, [doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07727-z]

2024 doi
[287]

Verlinde, Fusion rules and modular transformations in 2D conformal field theory , Nucl

E. Verlinde, Fusion rules and modular transformations in 2D conformal field theory , Nucl. Phys. B 300 (1988), 360-376, [ doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90603-7]

1988 doi
[288]

Voisin (translated by L

C. Voisin (translated by L. Schneps), Hodge theory and Complex algebraic geometry I , Cambridge Stud. in Adv. Math. 76 (2002), [doi:10.1017/CBO9780511615344]. 77

2002 doi
[289]

von Klitzing, The quantized Hall effect , Rev

K. von Klitzing, The quantized Hall effect , Rev. Mod. Phys. 58 519 (1986), [doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.58.519]

1986 doi
[290]

Waintal, The Quantum House Of Cards , PNAS 121 1 (2024) e2313269120, [ arXiv:2312.17570], [doi:10.1073/pnas.2313269120]

X. Waintal, The Quantum House Of Cards , PNAS 121 1 (2024) e2313269120, [ arXiv:2312.17570], [doi:10.1073/pnas.2313269120]

2024 arXiv
[291]

Y. Wang, Z. Hu, B. C. Sanders, and S. Kais, Qudits and high-dimensional quantum computing , Front. Phys. 8 479 (2020), [ doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.589504], [arXiv:2008.00959]

2020
[292]

Wen, Topological Orders in Rigid States , Int

X.-G. Wen, Topological Orders in Rigid States , Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 4 239 (1990), 239-271, [doi;10.1142/S0217979290000139]

1990 doi
[293]

Wen, Theory of Edge States in Fractional Quantum Hall Effects , International Journal of Modern Physics B 06 10 (1992) 1711-1762 [ doi:10.1142/S0217979292000840]

X.-G. Wen, Theory of Edge States in Fractional Quantum Hall Effects , International Journal of Modern Physics B 06 10 (1992) 1711-1762 [ doi:10.1142/S0217979292000840]

1992 doi
[294]

Wen, Topological orders and Edge excitations in FQH states , Adv

X.-G. Wen, Topological orders and Edge excitations in FQH states , Adv. Phys. 44 5 (1995) 405, [doi:10.1080/00018739500101566], [arXiv:cond-mat/9506066]

1995 arXiv
[295]

X.-G. Wen, Quantum Field Theory of Many-Body Systems: From the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Electrons, Oxford Academic (2007), [ doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199227259.001.0001]

2007
[296]

Wen and Q

X.-G. Wen and Q. Niu, Ground state degeneracy of the FQH states in presence of random potential and on high genus Riemann surfaces , Phys. Rev. B 41 (1990) 9377, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.41.9377]

1990 doi
[297]

Wen and A

X.-G. Wen and A. Zee, Classification of Abelian quantum Hall states and matrix formulation of topological fluids, Phys. Rev. B 46 (1992) 2290, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.46.2290]

1992 doi
[298]

G. W. Whitehead, Elements of Homotopy Theory , Springer (1978), [ doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-6318-0]

1978 doi
[299]

Wilczek, Quantum Mechanics of Fractional-Spin Particles , Phys

F. Wilczek, Quantum Mechanics of Fractional-Spin Particles , Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 957, [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.957]

1982 doi
[300]

Wilczek and A

F. Wilczek and A. Zee, Linking Numbers, Spin, and Statistics of Solitons , Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983) 2250 [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.2250]

1983 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

C. A. Abad, Introduction to representations of braid groups , Rev. Colomb. Mat. 49 1 (2015), [doi:10.15446/recolma.v49n1.54160], [arXiv:1404.0724]

arXiv 2015

[2] [2]

Ad´ amek, H

J. Ad´ amek, H. Herrlich, and G. Strecker, Abstract and Concrete Categories – The Joy of Cats , Wiley (1990), reprinted as: Reprints in Theory and Applications of Categories 17 (2006), 1-507, [ tac:tr17], [katmat.math.uni-bremen.de/acc]

1990

[3] [3]

Aguilar, S

M. Aguilar, S. Gitler, and C. Prieto, Algebraic topology from a homotopical viewpoint , Springer (2002), [doi:10.1007/b97586]

work page doi:10.1007/b97586 2002

[4] [4]

Alicea, Y

J. Alicea, Y. Oreg, G. Refael, F. von Oppen, and M. P. A. Fisher, Non-Abelian statistics and topological quantum information processing in 1D wire networks , Nature Physics 7 (2011) 412-417 [arXiv:1006.4395], [doi:10.1038/nphys1915]

arXiv 2011

[5] [5]

Alvarez, Topological quantization and cohomology, Commun

O. Alvarez, Topological quantization and cohomology, Commun. Math. Phys. 100 2 (1985), 279-309, [euclid:cmp/1103943448]

arXiv 1985

[6] [6]

Alvarez-Gaum´ e, G

L. Alvarez-Gaum´ e, G. Moore, and C. Vafa, Theta functions, modular invariance, and strings , Commun. Math. Phys. 106 1 (1986), 1-4, [ doi:10.1007/BF01210925], [euclid:cmp/1104115581]

arXiv 1986

[7] [7]

Armitage and A

V. Armitage and A. Rogers, Gauss Sums and Quantum Mechanics , J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 33 (2000) 5993, [doi:10.1088/0305-4470/33/34/305], [arXiv:quant-ph/0003107]

arXiv 2000

[8] [8]

D. P. Arovas, J. R. Schrieffer, and F. Wilczek, Fractional Statistics and the Quantum Hall Effect , Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 7 (1984), 722-723, [ doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.722]

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.53.722 1984