Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 54 references

Neutron Stars in Causal Scalar-Tensor Theories

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read An anti-screened scalar-tensor theory predicts two neutron-star branches for one central density and a cutoff above which no star exists, with mass-radius curves that match current data, including masses above three solar masses.

desk verdict The neutron-star application of this anti-screened K-essence model is new and interesting, with a plausible two-branch structure and critical density, but the numerical shooting criterion needs a systematic convergence study before the central claims are fully trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.23712 v2 pith:D4I7SHWF submitted 2025-05-29 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-phhep-th

Mark P. Hertzberg , Oleksandr S. Stashko This is my paper
classification gr-qcastro-ph.COhep-phhep-th
keywords K-essencescalar-tensortheoryneutronstarsanti-screeningTolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoffequationsmass-radiusrelationscalarchargemodifiedgravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies neutron stars in a scalar-tensor theory where the scalar's kinetic term is a general function (a K-essence form) chosen to keep signals subluminal. The scalar force is anti-screened: negligible at Solar System densities but amplified inside dense matter, so neutron stars should show the largest deviations from general relativity. Solving the modified Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations with four realistic nuclear equations of state, the paper finds that a fixed central density can admit two distinct static configurations on two separate branches, and that above a critical central density no configuration with the required flat-space asymptotic behavior exists. With suitable parameter values, the predicted mass-radius relations overlap current observational constraints and can reach maximum masses above three solar masses. The paper's claim is that these twin branches and the upper density cutoff are characteristic signatures of this causal, anti-screened theory rather than artifacts of any one equation of state.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the modified Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff system, equations (18)-(21), for the mass function $M(r)$, metric function $\alpha(r)$, scalar field $\phi(r)$, and pressure $\tilde p(r)$, closed by a barotropic equation of state. The scalar field equation is recast through the enclosed scalar charge $G Q_{\rm enc}(r)=-r^2 e^{\alpha}\sqrt{1-2GM(r)/r}\,K'_X\,\phi'$, whose total value at infinity equals an integral of the matter trace over the star; because $f'/f=\beta_1$ is constant, the charge is a direct volume integral of $T^{(M)}=\tilde\rho-3\tilde p$. Solutions are found by shooting the central scalar value $\phi_c$ and requiring $|\phi_\infty|=\min(10^{-6},10^{-5}|\phi_s|)$ at $r_\infty=10^5 r_0$, then restoring $\alpha_c$ by shift symmetry. The two branches arise because for one $\tilde\rho_c$ two different $\phi_c$ values pass that asymptotic test, and they vanish together at the critical density where the branches merge.

What would settle it

Integrate the same system to substantially larger $r_\infty$ (for example $10^7 r_0$) and tighten the tolerance, or use a compactified-coordinate method that imposes the asymptotic expansion at infinity directly. If the second branch or the critical central density shifts or disappears under this change, the numerical boundary condition rather than the theory is producing the claimed structure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the kinetic function $K(X) = -(\mu/\gamma)[(1-X/\mu)^\gamma - 1]$, with $1/2<\gamma<1$, coupled to matter through $f(\phi)=e^{\beta_1\phi}$, produces static neutron-star solutions whose structure is not unique. For a given central density $\tilde\rho_c$, two different central scalar-field values $\phi_c^{(1)}$ and $\phi_c^{(2)}$ both satisfy the asymptotic boundary condition at spatial infinity, giving two branches of solutions with different radii, masses, and scalar charges. On the first branch the scalar profile is nearly monotonic; on the second it changes sign. The branches merge at a critical central density $\tilde\rho_c^{\rm ext}$, and above it the authors find no solutions with acceptable asymptotic behavior. For $\gamma$ close to $1/2$, the mass-radius diagram develops loop- and nose-like features connecting white-dwarf and 'third family' segments, while for larger $\mu'$ the curves approach the general relativistic limit. With $\beta_1$ at the PPN bound, the theory matches current mass-radius data and permits maximum masses exceeding $3M_\odot$.

Load-bearing premise

The existence of the second branch and the critical density rests on accepting a solution when the scalar field at the finite outer radius $r_\infty=10^5 r_0$ has decayed to the tolerance $|\phi_\infty|=\min(10^{-6},10^{-5}|\phi_s|)$; if the true asymptotically flat solution decays more slowly or carries a larger scalar charge, this cutoff may manufacture the apparent branch and critical density.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Mass-radius curves from this theory can be placed directly on observational bands from pulsar X-ray and gravitational-wave measurements, and for some parameter choices they reproduce the data while remaining consistent with Solar System tests.
  • Because a single central density gives two equilibrium configurations, the theory predicts possible 'twin' neutron stars with different masses and radii at the same central density, an observational signature absent in standard general relativity.
  • The critical central density translates into an upper bound on the static solution sequence: denser configurations cannot be described by this model, constraining the allowed mass-radius region from above.
  • As $\mu'$ increases the family of solutions approaches the general relativistic limit, so the size of deviations is controlled by one dimensionful parameter of the K-essence action; small $\mu'$ gives large deviations, including maximum masses above $3M_\odot$.
  • For $\gamma=1/2+\epsilon$ with small $\epsilon$, the mass-radius diagram develops S-shaped and nose-shaped segments, some with positive slope, analogous to the third family of compact stars.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the paper does not establish stability. If, as its figures suggest, the second branch connects to the unstable segment of the first branch, the likely implication is that the second branch is dynamically unstable and would not be populated by real neutron stars; the two-branch structure would then be a threshold phenomenon rather than an observable population.
  • Editorial inference: an immediate testable extension is to compute tidal deformability and gravitational-wave signatures for both branches; a binary inspiral involving a second-branch star would differ measurably from a general-relativity waveform even at fixed matter equation of state.
  • Editorial inference: the claimed relation between enclosed scalar charge and the matter trace implies that the scalar force flips sign with radius, repulsive in the dense core where $\tilde\rho-3\tilde p<0$ and attractive outside. A direct check would be to compute scalar dipole radiation in a binary, constraining the coupling from pulsar timing rather than mass-radius alone.
  • Editorial inference: the existence of a critical central density suggests a maximum compactness for equilibrium stars in this theory; if a future observation finds a neutron star above that compactness, the corresponding parameter region would be excluded.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper investigates static, spherically symmetric neutron stars in a class of scalar-tensor theories with a non-canonical K-essence kinetic term, K(X)=-(μ/γ)[(1-X/μ)^γ-1] with 1/2<γ<1, and exponential conformal coupling f(φ)=e^{β1 φ}. The authors derive the modified TOV system (18)-(21), solve it numerically by a shooting method over the central scalar field, and use four EoSs (SLy4, WFF1, MS1, MPA1). The main claims are: (i) for a fixed central density two distinct static configurations can exist, forming two branches; (ii) above a critical central density no solution satisfying the imposed asymptotic condition at spatial infinity is found; and (iii) for suitable parameters the predicted mass-radius relations are consistent with current NICER and LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA constraints, including masses above 3 solar masses. The paper also derives the asymptotic 1/r expansion of the scalar field and the relation between Jordan- and Einstein-frame masses.

Significance. If correct, the results would demonstrate that a causal, anti-screened scalar-tensor theory can evade solar-system constraints while producing large effects in neutron stars, including a novel two-branch structure and a maximum central density beyond which static solutions cease to exist. The derivation of the modified TOV equations and the parameter scan are valuable: the comparison with observations is a genuine prediction rather than a fit, since β1 is fixed by PPN bounds and (μ, γ) are scanned. The main limitations are the lack of a systematic numerical convergence study for the shooting criterion that defines the asymptotic condition, the absence of a stability analysis of the new branches, and the qualitative character of the 'agreement' with observational constraints. The paper also does not provide code or data, which hampers independent verification of the claimed two-branch structure.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV and Section V] The central existence claims—two branches for a given central density and a critical density ρ_ext_c above which no solutions exist—rest on the shooting acceptance criterion |φ(r∞)| ≤ min(10^-6, 10^-5|φ_s|) at fixed r∞ = 10^5 r0. The only robustness statement in Section IV is that 'small changes of |φ∞| do not significantly affect the results,' which is not a convergence test. Since the asymptotic solution has φ ≈ GQ/r, a configuration with a large scalar charge Q can fail the finite-radius threshold even if it is asymptotically flat, and the stiff integration for the second branch (φ_c ≫ 0) can make the shooting fail numerically above ρ_ext_c. Please perform a systematic study varying r∞ (e.g., 10^4, 10^5, 10^6 r0) and the tolerance, report the extracted Q and M as functions of these choices, and rephrase the upper-density conclusion as 'no solutions were found' unless a robust convergence test supports nonexistence.
  2. [Section V] The statement that the model can reproduce current observational constraints and produce maximum masses above 3 solar masses is not accompanied by a stability analysis. The second branch is only conjectured to be dynamically unstable, and the S-like segments are discounted by the sign of ∂M~/∂ρ_c, which is at best a proxy. Without computing the radial oscillation spectrum (or at least a turning-point criterion within the modified theory), it is not established that the observationally relevant portions of the M-R curves are stable. Since only stable configurations are physically meaningful neutron-star models, the observational claims should be restricted to demonstrably stable branches or rephrased accordingly.
  3. [Section V, Figs. 2-4] The claimed agreement with observations is qualitative. The figures overlay theoretical curves on 90%/95% credible regions, but no likelihood, chi-square, or other goodness-of-fit measure is computed, and no error bars are assigned to the model predictions. Given the abstract's phrase 'precise predictions,' the paper should either quantify the agreement or use more cautious wording such as 'can be consistent with current constraints.' This is a presentation issue in the interpretation of the parameter scan, not a flaw in the underlying equations.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (7)] The same index μ appears in ∂_μ and g^{μν}∂_μ φ; the second derivative should be with respect to ν.
  2. [Section III] The phrase 'except the case with p = 1' should refer to γ = 1, since p has not been defined as a parameter.
  3. [Introduction and Section II] The text contains typographical errors: 'LIGO/VIRGO/KARGA' should be 'LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA', and Section II has duplications such as 'via via' and 'the the'.
  4. [Section IV] The outer boundary is introduced as r'_∞ = 10^5, which is dimensionless in units of r0; the text should state explicitly that this means r∞ = 10^5 r0.
  5. [Figure 2 caption] The label 'J0704' appears without the full pulsar designation (likely PSR J0740+6620); please check all caption labels.
  6. [General] A brief data/code availability statement would improve reproducibility, since the numerical shooting results are not accompanied by code or tabulated output.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the mass-radius curves are parameter-scan predictions rather than fits, and the only self-citation (the model choice from Ref. [6]) is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained: the modified TOV system (18)-(21) is derived from the action (1) with the stated K(X) (12), solved numerically with standard equations of state, and then compared with observations. The parameters beta1, mu, and gamma are not fitted to neutron-star data: beta1 is fixed at the PPN upper bound and mu and gamma are scanned over grids, so the mass-radius curves are conditional predictions rather than fitted inputs presented as predictions. The only self-citation is Ref. [6], which is used to motivate the anti-screened K(X) form and the causality bound; this is a theory-selection step, not an input whose output is later relabeled as a discovery. The numerical shooting criterion |phi_inf| <= min(10^-6, 10^-5 |phi_s|) is an approximation that could affect the branch-structure claims, but concern about it is a numerical robustness issue rather than circularity, because the criterion is not constructed to force the claimed two-branch and merging behavior. Accordingly, no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central predictions depend on three free parameters (beta1, mu, gamma); beta1 is anchored to solar system data, while mu and gamma are scanned. No new particles or forces are invented; the scalar field and its kinetic function are carried over from the prior model in Ref. [6].

free parameters (3)
  • beta1 (scalar coupling) = 0.024/Mp
    Set to the PPN upper bound (Eq. 34) to maximize the scalar effect in neutron stars.
  • mu (energy scale in K(X)) = scanned over dimensionless mu' from 10^-31 to 10^-23 (and other ranges)
    Controls the density at which non-canonical kinetic effects turn on; not fitted to NS data.
  • gamma (exponent in K(X)) = 5/6, 6/7, 0.501
    Shape parameter in the allowed range 1/2 < gamma < 1; varied to show dependence.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The action (1) with K(X) of the specific form (12) and conformal coupling f(phi)=e^(beta1 phi) is the theory under study.
    The paper adopts this model from Ref. [6]; all predictions are conditional on it.
  • domain assumption Matter is an ideal isotropic fluid with a barotropic equation of state.
    Section II; standard in neutron star studies, but an idealization.
  • domain assumption Spacetime is static and spherically symmetric.
    Section III, line element (16); possible rotating effects are ignored.
  • domain assumption The scalar field is massless and decays as 1/r at infinity, as in the asymptotic expansion (25).
    The model has no potential; the asymptotic solution is used to define the scalar charge and boundary conditions.
  • domain assumption The PPN bound beta1 <~ 0.024/Mp (Eq. 34) from Cassini and Lunar Laser Ranging is valid.
    External experimental constraint used to fix beta1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Neutron Stars in Causal Scalar-Tensor Theories." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/D4I7SHWF

@misc{pith2026250523712,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Neutron Stars in Causal Scalar-Tensor Theories},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/D4I7SHWF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.23712}
}
read the original abstract

We study static, spherically symmetric neutron stars in a class of scalar-tensor theories with non-canonical kinetic terms (K-essence) obeying all causality and hyperbolicity conditions. These models have non-trivial dynamics that lead to a type of anti-screening of the scalar. They lead to small corrections in the solar system due to a small coupling, but can lead to large corrections in regimes of high densities, especially neutron stars. We solve the modified Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations numerically using realistic equations of state (SLy4, WFF1, MS1, MPA1). For a given central density, we find that two distinct configurations may exist, forming two separate branches of solutions. We find that above a certain critical central density solutions with the correct asymptotic behavior at spatial infinity cannot be obtained. We obtain precise predictions for the mass-radius relation for neutron stars for different values of the parameters in the model and we compare to data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.23712 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. An example of the SLy4 EoS [47]; The blue dashed line corresponds to the conformal limit (˜p = ˜ρ/3). One can see that T˜(M) = ˜ρ − 3˜p is positive for low densities (relevant to outer part of neutron star), while it is negative for high densities (relevant to inner part of neutron star). V. PREDICTIONS FOR NEUTRON STARS We solve the modified TOV equations(18)–(21) to ob￾tain static equilibrium configurations of neu… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Mass-radius diagram for neutron stars for different realistic equations of state with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Mass-radius diagram for neutron stars for different realistic equations of state with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Mass-radius diagram for neutron stars for different realistic equations of state with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Mass versus central pressure for different values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The typical behavior of scalar field φ(r) is shown for the first branch (left) and the second branch (right) as functions of radius rs, for the SLy4 EoS with β ′ 1 = 0.024, γ = 5/6, and µ ′ = 10−29, for several values of the central density. The solid and dashed segmen…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Left panel: The typical behavior of the rescaled scalar charge [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The typical behavior of the rescaled kinetic term [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [6]

    M. P. Hertzberg, J. A. Litterer, and N. Shah, Causal modifications of gravity and their observational bounds, Physical Review D 107, 10.1103/physrevd.107.024037 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.024037 2023

  2. [1]

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole, APJL 875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]

    arXiv 2019

  3. [2]

    Abbott and et al (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [3]

    Abbott and et al (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Gw170817: Observation of gravi- tational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral, Phys

    B.P. Abbott and et al (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Gw170817: Observation of gravi- tational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [4]

    Clifton, P

    T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, and C. Skordis, Modified Gravity and Cosmology, Phys. Rept. 513, 1 (2012), arXiv:1106.2476 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2012

  6. [5]

    C. M. Will, The confrontation between general relativ- ity and experiment, Living Reviews in Relativity 17, 10.12942/lrr-2014-4 (2014)

    doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 2014

  7. [7]

    Fujii and K

    Y. Fujii and K. Maeda, The scalar-tensor theory of gravi- tation, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    2007

  8. [8]

    Faraoni, Cosmology in scalar tensor gravity(2004)

    V. Faraoni, Cosmology in scalar tensor gravity(2004)

    work page 2004

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    Berti, E

    E. Berti, E. Barausse, V. Cardoso, L. Gualtieri, P. Pani, U. Sperhake, L. C. Stein, N. Wex, K. Yagi, T. Baker, C. P. Burgess, F. S. Coelho, D. Doneva, A. D. Felice, P. G. Ferreira, P. C. C. Freire, J. Healy, C. Herdeiro, M. Horbatsch, B. Kleihaus, A. Klein, K. Kokkotas, J. Kun...

    2015

  2. [10]

    Yunes, M

    N. Yunes, M. C. Miller, and K. Yagi, Gravitational-wave and x-ray probes of the neutron star equation of state, Nature Reviews Physics 4, 237–246 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    Kumar et al.(MUSES), Theoretical and experimental constraints for the equation of state of dense and hot matter, Living Rev

    R. Kumar et al.(MUSES), Theoretical and experimental constraints for the equation of state of dense and hot matter, Living Rev. Rel. 27, 3 (2024), arXiv:2303.17021 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    J. M. Lattimer and M. Prakash, The equation of state of hot, dense matter and neutron stars, Physics Reports 621, 127–164 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann, S. Bog- danov, Z. Arzoumanian, K. C. Gendreau, S. Guillot, A. K. Harding, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer, R. M. Lud- lam, S. Mahmoodifar, S. M. Morsink, P. S. Ray, T. E. Strohmayer, K. S. Wood, T. Enoto, R. Foster, T. Oka- jima, G. Prigoz...

    2019

  6. [14]

    M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann, S. Bogdanov, Z. Arzoumanian, K. C. Gendreau, S. Guillot, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer, M. Loewenstein, S. M. Morsink, P. S. Ray, M. T. Wolff, C. L. Baker, T. Cazeau, S. Man- thripragada, C. B. Markwardt, T. Okajima, S. Pollard, I. Cogna...

    2021

  7. [15]

    B. P. e. a. Abbott (The LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration), Gw170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 161101 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    B. P. e. a. Abbott, Gw190425: Observation of a compact binary coalescence with total mass 3.4 m, The Astrophys- ical Journal Letters 892, L3 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    R. e. a. Abbott, Gw190814: Gravitational waves from the coalescence of a 23 solar mass black hole with a 2.6 solar mass compact object, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 896, L44 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    H. O. Silva, C. F. B. Macedo, E. Berti, and L. C. B. Crispino, Slowly rotating anisotropic neutron stars in general relativity and scalar-tensor theory, Classical and Quantum Gravity 32, 145008 (2015), arXiv:1411.6286 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Damour and G

    T. Damour and G. Esposito-Far` ese, Nonperturbative strong-field effects in tensor-scalar theories of gravitation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2220 (1993)

    1993

  12. [20]

    Pani and E

    P. Pani and E. Berti, Slowly rotating neutron stars in scalar-tensor theories, Physical Review D 90, 10.1103/physrevd.90.024025 (2014)

    2014 doi

  13. [21]

    S. M. Brown, Tidal deformability of neutron stars in scalar-tensor theories of gravity, The Astrophysical Jour- nal 958, 125 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Barranco, J

    J. Barranco, J. Chagoya, A. Diez-Tejedor, G. Niz, and A. A. Roque, Horndeski stars, JCAP 2021 (10), 022, arXiv:2108.01679 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Cisterna, T

    A. Cisterna, T. Delsate, L. Ducobu, and M. Rinaldi, Slowly rotating neutron stars in the nonminimal deriva- tive coupling sector of Horndeski gravity, Phys. Rev. D 93, 084046 (2016), arXiv:1602.06939 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Maselli, H

    A. Maselli, H. O. Silva, M. Minamitsuji, and E. Berti, Neutron stars in horndeski gravity, Physical Review D 93, 10.1103/physrevd.93.124056 (2016)

    2016 doi

  17. [25]

    R. Kase, R. Kimura, S. Sato, and S. Tsujikawa, Stability of relativistic stars with scalar hairs, Physical Review D 102, 10.1103/physrevd.102.084037 (2020)

    2020 doi

  18. [26]

    Cisterna, T

    A. Cisterna, T. Delsate, and M. Rinaldi, Neutron stars in general second order scalar-tensor theory: The case of nonminimal derivative coupling, Phys. Rev. D92, 044050 (2015), arXiv:1504.05189 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Boumaza, Axial and polar stability of neutron stars in scalar-tensor theories with disformal coupling, Phys

    H. Boumaza, Axial and polar stability of neutron stars in scalar-tensor theories with disformal coupling, Phys. Rev. D 108, 044068 (2023), arXiv:2303.16664 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    P. Ji, Z. Li, L. Yang, R. Xu, Z. Hu, and L. Shao, Neutron stars in the bumblebee theory of gravity, Phys. Rev. D 110, 104057 (2024), arXiv:2409.04805 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    R. Kase, M. Minamitsuji, and S. Tsujikawa, Neutron stars with a generalized proca hair and spontaneous vectorization, Physical Review D 102, 10.1103/phys- 12 revd.102.024067 (2020)

    2020 doi

  22. [30]

    Z. Liu, Z. Li, L. Liang, S. Li, and H. Yu, Neutron stars in Gauss-Bonnet extended Starobinsky gravity, Phys. Rev. D 110, 124052 (2024), arXiv:2410.14108 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Saavedra, G

    A. Saavedra, G. Rubilar, O. Fierro, M. Gammon, and R. B. Mann, Neutron stars in 4D Einstein-Gauss- Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D 111, 064071 (2025), arXiv:2412.15459 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  24. [32]

    D. D. Doneva, C. J. Kr¨ uger, K. V. Staykov, and P. Y. Yordanov, Neutron stars in Gauss-Bonnet gravity: Non- linear scalarization and gravitational phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D 108, 044054 (2023), arXiv:2306.16988 [gr- qc]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Armendariz-Picon, T

    C. Armendariz-Picon, T. Damour, and V. F. Mukhanov, k - inflation, Phys. Lett. B 458, 209 (1999), arXiv:hep- th/9904075

    1999

  26. [34]

    Armendariz-Picon, V

    C. Armendariz-Picon, V. F. Mukhanov, and P. J. Stein- hardt, Essentials of k essence, Phys. Rev. D 63, 103510 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0006373

    2001 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Cayuso, A

    R. Cayuso, A. Kuntz, M. Bezares, and E. Barausse, Scalar emission from neutron star-black hole binaries in scalar-tensor theories with kinetic screening, Phys. Rev. D 110, 104071 (2024), arXiv:2410.16367 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    P. Brax, C. Burrage, and A.-C. Davis, Screening fifth forces in k-essence and dbi models, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2013 (01), 020–020

    2013

  29. [37]

    Brax and P

    P. Brax and P. Valageas, The effective field theory of k-mouflage, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2016 (01), 020–020

    2016

  30. [38]

    P. Brax, S. Casas, H. Desmond, and B. Elder, Test- ing Screened Modified Gravity, Universe 8, 11 (2021), arXiv:2201.10817 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Aharonov, A

    Y. Aharonov, A. Komar, and L. Susskind, Superluminal behavior, causality, and instability, Phys. Rev.182, 1400 (1969)

    1969

  32. [40]

    A. D. Rendall, Dynamics of k -essence, Classical and Quantum Gravity 23, 1557–1569 (2006)

    2006

  33. [41]

    Koyama, Cosmological tests of modified gravity, Re- ports on Progress in Physics 79, 046902 (2016)

    K. Koyama, Cosmological tests of modified gravity, Re- ports on Progress in Physics 79, 046902 (2016)

    2016

  34. [42]

    I. Z. Fisher, Scalar mesostatic field with regard for grav- itational effects (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9911008 [gr-qc]

    1999 arXiv

  35. [43]

    A. I. Janis, E. T. Newman, and J. Winicour, Reality of the schwarzschild singularity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 878 (1968)

    1968

  36. [44]

    Bertotti, L

    B. Bertotti, L. Iess, and P. Tortora, A test of general relativity using radio links with the Cassini spacecraft, Nature 425, 374 (2003)

    2003

  37. [45]

    J. G. Williams, S. G. Turyshev, and D. H. Boggs, Progress in Lunar Laser Ranging Tests of Relativistic Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 261101 (2004), arXiv:gr- qc/0411113 [gr-qc]

    2004

  38. [46]

    R. B. Wiringa, V. Fiks, and A. Fabrocini, Equation of state for dense nucleon matter, Phys. Rev. C 38, 1010 (1988)

    1988

  39. [47]

    Douchin and P

    F. Douchin and P. Haensel, A unified equation of state of dense matter and neutron star structure, Astronomy I& Astrophysics 380, 151–167 (2001)

    2001

  40. [48]

    M¨ uller and B

    H. M¨ uller and B. D. Serot, Relativistic mean-field theory and the high-density nuclear equation of state, Nuclear Physics A 606, 508–537 (1996)

    1996

  41. [49]

    M¨ uther, M

    H. M¨ uther, M. Prakash, and T. L. Ainsworth, The nu- clear symmetry energy in relativistic Brueckner-Hartree- Fock calculations, Physics Letters B 199, 469 (1987)

    1987

  42. [50]

    Haensel and A

    P. Haensel and A. Y. Potekhin, Analytical representa- tions of unified equations of state of neutron-star matter, Astronomy & Astrophysics 428, 191–197 (2004)

    2004

  43. [51]

    Gungor and K

    C. Gungor and K. Y. Eksi, Analytical representa- tion for equations of state of dense matter (2011), arXiv:1108.2166 [astro-ph.SR]

    2011 arXiv

  44. [52]

    J. S. Read, B. D. Lackey, B. J. Owen, and J. L. Fried- man, Constraints on a phenomenologically parametrized neutron-star equation of state, Physical Review D 79, 10.1103/physrevd.79.124032 (2009)

    2009 doi

  45. [53]

    Doroshenko, V

    V. Doroshenko, V. Suleimanov, G. P¨ uhlhofer, and A. Santangelo, A strangely light neutron star within a supernova remnant, Nature Astronomy 6, 1444 (2022)

    2022

  46. [54]

    S. L. Shapiro and S. A. Teukolsky, Black holes, white dwarfs and neutron stars. The physics of compact objects (1983)

    1983

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.