Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 47 references

Static vs dynamic rough energy landscapes: Where is diffusion faster?

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A random walker on an energy landscape that fluctuates in both time and space moves with the same mean jump rate and short-time diffusivity as on a static landscape, provided the walker and landscape obey detailed balance.

desk verdict Sound main result on dynamic rough landscapes, but Appendix A has a genuine detailed-balance inconsistency that needs a fix. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.02195 v1 pith:6Z5XAM6T submitted 2025-06-02 cond-mat.stat-mech physics.bio-phphysics.chem-ph

Dmitrii E. Makarov , Peter Sollich This is my paper
classification cond-mat.stat-mechphysics.bio-phphysics.chem-ph
keywords dynamicenergylandscapesroughpotentialdiffusiondetailedbalanceback-reactionmeandwelltimeshort-timediffusivityfluctuatinglatticedisordernon-Markovian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether a particle diffusing through an environment whose energy landscape fluctuates in time moves faster than through a static rough landscape. The intuitive answer is yes, since fluctuating barriers should periodically open escape routes. The paper constructs a discrete lattice model in which the walker's presence alters the landscape's own transition rates so that the combined system satisfies detailed balance, and proves that under that condition the mean time between jumps and the short-time diffusivity are independent of how fast the landscape fluctuates; they are controlled only by the equilibrium statistics of the empty landscape. In the case where hopping rates depend only on the departure site, the full diffusivity equals the classic static rough-landscape result. The reader should care because this shows when decades-old static formulas remain valid in dynamically fluctuating environments such as cell interiors.

What carries the argument

The key object is the detailed-balance constraint on the four-state cycle that couples a walker hop between neighboring sites to a simultaneous change of internal states in a block of adjacent lattice sites. Equating clockwise and counterclockwise products of rate coefficients (Eq. 10), together with the requirement that empty-lattice rates are unchanged, yields the conditional equilibrium measure $p(\vec{s}|n) \propto p_0(\vec{s}) e^{\beta \epsilon(s_n)}$ for the landscape at an occupied site. This measure is the engine of the paper: inserting it into the flux sum (Eq. 17) and the short-time mean-square-displacement formula (Eq. 20) produces results that do not depend on the landscape fluctuation dynamics.

What would settle it

Simulate a two-well or lattice model with fixed empty-lattice equilibrium site populations, choose transition rates that satisfy detailed balance, and vary the landscape switching rate $\alpha$ over many orders of magnitude while measuring the mean waiting time; if $\tau$ changes with $\alpha$, the central claim is false. The detailed-balance-violating version of the same model, where $\tau$ grows with $\alpha$ according to Eq. 2, shows exactly the deviation to look for.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that temporal landscape fluctuations need not accelerate diffusion once the walker's back-reaction is included. For a lattice whose sites cycle through internal states with arbitrary, possibly correlated dynamics, detailed balance forces the conditional landscape distribution at an occupied site to be $p(\vec{s}|n) \propto p_0(\vec{s}) e^{\beta \epsilon(s_n)}$. Averaging the escape flux with this measure makes the mean jump rate $\tau^{-1}$ and the short-time diffusivity $D^{(0)}$ functions only of the empty-lattice equilibrium statistics and the binding energies $\epsilon(s)$. When hopping rates depend only on the departure site, the mean-square displacement grows linearly at all times and $D = k_0 a^2 / \langle e^{\beta \epsilon} \rangle$, identical to the static rough-potential result. For rates that also depend on the arrival site, the same measure still fixes $\tau$ and $D^{(0)}$, but the full dynamics become non-Markovian and a single diffusivity cannot describe all timescales. The waiting-time distributions, by contrast, do depend on the fluctuation rate, so the insensitivity is a statement about means, not about full statistics.

Load-bearing premise

The result rests on detailed balance between the walker and the lattice: the walker's occupancy must change the lattice's transition rates exactly so that no dissipative cycles exist, and if real landscape fluctuations are out of equilibrium, the mean dwell time does depend on the fluctuation rate, as shown in Eq. 2.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the departure-site-only model, the diffusivity is $D = k_0 a^2 / \langle e^{\beta \epsilon} \rangle$, the same as in a static rough landscape; dynamic disorder neither speeds up nor slows down the walk on average.
  • The mean dwell time per site, $\tau = \langle e^{\beta \epsilon} \rangle / (2 k_0)$, is fixed solely by empty-lattice equilibrium statistics, so measuring $\tau$ alone cannot reveal the landscape fluctuation rate.
  • Once hopping rates depend on the arrival site as well, the dynamics are non-Markovian: a single time-independent diffusivity cannot describe the motion at all timescales, although the mean jump time and short-time diffusivity remain protected.
  • Energy fluctuations around the mean always reduce the diffusivity relative to a uniform landscape of the mean depth, by the factor $\langle e^{\beta(\epsilon - \langle \epsilon \rangle)} \rangle \ge 1$.
  • The paper's result justifies using the static rough-landscape prediction for mean jump times and short-time diffusivity even when the underlying landscape is known to be fluctuating, as long as the combined walker-landscape system is in equilibrium.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If real environments are actively driven and violate detailed balance, the two-well example in Eq. 2 suggests the acceleration intuition returns; the detailed-balance result can therefore serve as a quantitative baseline for detecting non-equilibrium fluctuations in single-particle tracking experiments.
  • A practical test is to vary how fast the environment is stirred while keeping the equilibrium site populations fixed and to measure the mean dwell time: if it changes, the combined system is not in equilibrium, and the static-formula protection does not apply.
  • The conditional-measure argument is stated to generalize to rates depending on more distant sites, so analogous formulas for short-time diffusivity could be derived without solving the full non-Markovian dynamics, extending the paper's unification to richer lattice rules.
  • Because only means are protected, analyses that report an effective diffusivity from long-time mean-square displacement in fluctuating landscapes should be separated from the short-time plateau; the two may disagree with each other and with the static formula, and neither directly measures the fluctuation rate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper introduces a discrete-state model of a random walker on a lattice whose site energies fluctuate in time. The walker's hopping rates depend on the internal states of the departure and (possibly) arrival sites, and the lattice dynamics are modified by the walker's presence so that the combined walker-lattice process satisfies detailed balance. Under this assumption, the authors prove that the mean dwell time (Eq. 17), the short-time diffusivity (Eq. 20), and, for the departure-only hopping model, the full diffusivity (Eq. 24) are independent of the timescale of the landscape fluctuations; these observables are determined solely by the equilibrium statistics of the empty landscape. In the departure-only case the diffusivity coincides with the static Lifson-Jackson-Zwanzig result. The paper also derives short-time diffusivities for a one-parameter family of models with arrival-site dependence (Eqs. 25-30) and shows that these generally differ from the static prediction. A two-well toy model (Section I) illustrates that the naive accelerating effect of fluctuations disappears once detailed balance is enforced.

Significance. The paper's central result is a clean and non-obvious theorem: for an equilibrium (detailed-balance) environment, the mean dwell time and short-time diffusivity of a random walker are insensitive to the temporal dynamics of the landscape. The authors correctly identify the walker's back-reaction as the essential ingredient and demonstrate, through the toy model, that neglecting it leads to a violation of detailed balance and an explicit α-dependence (Eq. 2). The derivations are transparent and self-contained, with all claims backed by explicit calculations; no free parameters are fitted, and the equality with the static result is a theorem. The main limitation is the detailed-balance assumption itself, which is a physical modeling choice; the paper states this scope honestly and even shows the opposite behavior when it is relaxed. This work should be of interest to the statistical mechanics and biophysics communities studying diffusion in fluctuating environments.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Section II, Eqs. 12-13] Please clarify the convention for α, γ and α′, γ′ (which direction is the 'forward' rate) and state explicitly that the derivation of Eq. 15 relies on the global detailed-balance property of the combined process, not only on the single cycle of Fig. 3.
  2. [Appendix A] The enumeration of states 1-4 used in the kinetic matrix K_L is not given in the text; a short explanation (e.g., which states have the left well shallow or deep) would help the reader verify Eq. A2 and the population vector p_L.
  3. [Section II, Eqs. 16-17] The notation ⟨e^{βε}⟩ is defined in Eq. 16 as an average over the single-site marginal p0(s), while the sums in Eq. 17 run over full configurations; please state explicitly that the average in Eq. 17 is taken with the full joint distribution p0(⃗s), so that correlations are properly included.
  4. [Section I, Fig. 1C] The explicit values of the modified rates α′ and γ′ that produce Eq. 3 are not given; providing them (or the condition they satisfy, α′/γ′ = p(deep|n)/p(shallow|n)) would make the toy model fully explicit.
  5. [Footnote 30 and Eq. 23] The proof that ⟨x(t)^2⟩ = 2Dt assumes the walker-lattice process is started in its stationary state, so that the jump rate is constant in time; this assumption should be stated.
  6. [Abstract and Section III] The phrase 'many features of the observable dynamics do not depend on the temporal fluctuation timescales' is correct, but the paper should perhaps emphasize more visibly that the waiting-time distributions do depend on α (Fig. 4), to avoid overgeneralization by casual readers.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the α-independence result is derived from the detailed-balance assumption, not assumed as an input.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The paper posits a kinetic network for a walker coupled to a fluctuating lattice and imposes detailed balance on the combined system (Eq. 10). From the cycle balance condition together with the empty-lattice equilibrium distribution p0, it derives the conditional occupancy p(s|n) = p0(s)e^{βϵ(sn)}/⟨e^{βϵ}⟩ (Eq. 15). The mean jump rate (Eq. 17) and the diffusivities (Eqs. 20 and 24) follow by direct summation; the equality with the static Lifson-Jackson-Zwanzig expression is a theorem derived in the paper (compare Eq. 24 with Eq. B15), not a fitted input. The α-independence is not put in by hand: Eq. 2 explicitly shows that a non-detail-balanced network has α-dependent rates, and the detailed-balance case yields the α-independent result (Eq. 3). No parameter is fitted to data, and no load-bearing claim rests on a self-citation; Refs. 18, 22, and 43 by the authors are contextual and do not support the central derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; the model parameters (k0, beta, epsilon(s), alpha, lambda) are inputs. The key axioms are the detailed balance of the combined system, the Markovian lattice dynamics with equilibrium p0(s), the locality of hopping rates, and the factorization of the joint Boltzmann weight.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The combined walker-lattice process is Markovian and satisfies detailed balance (Eq. 8).
    The central result fails when detailed balance is broken, as shown by comparing Eq. 3 (detailed balance) with Eq. 2 (violation).
  • domain assumption In the absence of the walker, the lattice internal state dynamics is a Markov jump process with equilibrium distribution p0(s).
    Defines the reference equilibrium statistics used in Eq. 15 and the averages in Eqs. 17-30.
  • ad hoc to paper The walker's hopping rates depend only on the internal states of the departure and arrival sites (stated after Eq. 8).
    Restricts the model class; the result may not hold for more general non-local dependence of hopping rates.
  • domain assumption The walker-lattice interaction energy is -epsilon(s_n) when the walker occupies site n, so the joint Boltzmann weight factorizes as p0(s) e^{beta epsilon(s_n)}.
    Gives the conditional distribution in Eq. 15, which is the foundation for the flux calculation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Static vs dynamic rough energy landscapes: Where is diffusion faster?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6Z5XAM6T

@misc{pith2026250602195,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Static vs dynamic rough energy landscapes: Where is diffusion faster?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6Z5XAM6T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.02195}
}
read the original abstract

Molecules in dense environments, such as biological cells, are subjected to forces that fluctuate both in time and in space. While spatial fluctuations are captured by Lifson-Jackson-Zwanzig's model of "diffusion in a rough potential", and temporal fluctuations are often viewed as leading to additional friction effects, a unified view where the environment fluctuates both in time and in space is currently lacking. Here we introduce a discrete-state model of a landscape fluctuating both in time and in space. Importantly, the model accounts for the back-reaction of the diffusing particle on the landscape. As a result we find, surprisingly, that many features of the observable dynamics do not depend on the temporal fluctuation timescales and are already captured by the model of diffusion in a rough potential, even though this assumes a static energy landscape.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.02195 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Toy model of a random walker in a fluctuating two-well landscape. (A): In the absence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Top: Random walk on a landscape with potential wells of fluctuating depth. Bottom: We [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. An example of a cycle involving four states of the walker-lattice system. This cycle is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Distribution of the lifetime in the left or right potential well for the model of Fig. 1 plotted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author D. E. \ Makarov ,\ @noop title Single molecule science: physical principles and models \ ( publisher CRC Press ,\ year 2015 ) NoStop

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    Simon , author L

    author author F. Simon , author L. E. \ Weiss , \ and\ author S. van Teeffelen ,\ title title A guide to single-particle tracking , \ 10.1038/s43586-024-00341-3 journal journal Nature Reviews Methods Primers \ volume 4 ,\ pages 66 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s43586-024-00341-3

  3. [3]

    Fazel , author K

    author author M. Fazel , author K. S. \ Grussmayer , author B. Ferdman , author A. Radenovic , author Y. Shechtman , author J. Enderlein , \ and\ author S. Pressé ,\ title title Fluorescence microscopy: A statistics-optics perspective , \ 10.1103/revmodphys.96.025003 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 96 ( year 2024 ),\ 10.1103/revmodphys....

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.96.025003

  4. [4]

    Zwanzig ,\ @noop title Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics \ ( publisher Oxford University Press ,\ year 2001 ) NoStop

    author author R. Zwanzig ,\ @noop title Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics \ ( publisher Oxford University Press ,\ year 2001 ) NoStop

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    Mori ,\ title title Transport, collective motion, and brownian motion , \ @noop journal journal Progress of theoretical physics \ volume 33 ,\ pages 423--455 ( year 1965 ) NoStop

    author author H. Mori ,\ title title Transport, collective motion, and brownian motion , \ @noop journal journal Progress of theoretical physics \ volume 33 ,\ pages 423--455 ( year 1965 ) NoStop

    work page 1965

  6. [6]

    Grabert ,\ @noop title Projection operator techniques in nonequilibrium statistical mechanics ,\ Vol

    author author H. Grabert ,\ @noop title Projection operator techniques in nonequilibrium statistical mechanics ,\ Vol. volume 95 \ ( publisher Springer ,\ year 2006 ) NoStop

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    Glatzel \ and\ author T

    author author F. Glatzel \ and\ author T. Schilling ,\ title title The interplay between memory and potentials of mean force: A discussion on the structure of equations of motion for coarse-grained observables , \ 10.1209/0295-5075/ac35ba journal journal Europhysics Letters \ volume 136 ,\ pages 36001 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1209/0295-5075/ac35ba

  8. [8]

    Hij \'o n , author P

    author author C. Hij \'o n , author P. Espa \ n ol , author E. Vanden-Eijnden , \ and\ author R. Delgado-Buscalioni ,\ title title Mori--zwanzig formalism as a practical computational tool , \ @noop journal journal Faraday discussions \ volume 144 ,\ pages 301--322 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    work page 2010

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Ayaz , author L

    author author C. Ayaz , author L. Scalfi , author B. A. \ Dalton , \ and\ author R. R. \ Netz ,\ title title Generalized langevin equation with a nonlinear potential of mean force and nonlinear memory friction from a hybrid projection scheme , \ 10.1103/PhysRevE.105.054138 jou...

    doi

  2. [10]

    Lifson \ and\ author J

    author author S. Lifson \ and\ author J. L. \ Jackson ,\ title title On the self-diffusion of ions in a polyelectrolyte solution , \ 10.1063/1.1732899 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 36 ,\ pages 2410–2414 ( year 1962 ) NoStop

    doi

  3. [11]

    Zwanzig ,\ title title Diffusion in a rough potential

    author author R. Zwanzig ,\ title title Diffusion in a rough potential. \ 10.1073/pnas.85.7.2029 journal journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences \ volume 85 ,\ pages 2029–2030 ( year 1988 ) NoStop

    1988 doi

  4. [12]

    author author P. G. \ De Gennes ,\ title title Brownian motion of a classical particle through potential barriers. application to the helix-coil transitions of heteropolymers , \ 10.1007/bf01025834 journal journal Journal of Statistical Physics \ volume 12 ,\ pages 463–481 ( y...

    doi

  5. [13]

    author author J. D. \ Bryngelson \ and\ author P. G. \ Wolynes ,\ title title Intermediates and barrier crossing in a random energy model (with applications to protein folding) , \ 10.1021/j100356a007 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry \ volume 93 ,\ pages 6902–...

    doi

  6. [14]

    author author T. H. \ Gray \ and\ author E. H. \ Yong ,\ title title Effective diffusion in one-dimensional rough potential-energy landscapes , \ 10.1103/PhysRevE.102.022138 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 102 ,\ pages 022138 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  7. [15]

    Hubbard \ and\ author L

    author author J. Hubbard \ and\ author L. Onsager ,\ title title Dielectric dispersion and dielectric friction in electrolyte solutions. i. \ 10.1063/1.434664 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 67 ,\ pages 4850–4857 ( year 1977 ) NoStop

    doi

  8. [16]

    Nee \ and\ author R

    author author T. Nee \ and\ author R. Zwanzig ,\ title title Theory of dielectric relaxation in polar liquids , \ 10.1063/1.1672951 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 52 ,\ pages 6353--6363 ( year 1970 ) NoStop

    1970 doi

  9. [17]

    Samanta \ and\ author D

    author author T. Samanta \ and\ author D. V. \ Matyushov ,\ title title Dielectric friction, violation of the stokes-einstein-debye relation, and non-gaussian transport dynamics of dipolar solutes in water , \ 10.1103/physrevresearch.3.023025 journal journal Physical Review Re...

    doi

  10. [18]

    author author D. E. \ Makarov \ and\ author H. Hofmann ,\ title title Does electric friction matter in living cells? \ 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c02783 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry B \ volume 125 ,\ pages 6144--6153 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi

  11. [19]

    Straub , author M

    author author J. Straub , author M. Borkovec , \ and\ author B. Berne ,\ title title Non-markovian activated rate processes: Comparison of current theories with numerical simulation data , \ @noop journal journal J Chem Phys \ volume 84 ,\ pages 1788--1794 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

    1986

  12. [20]

    author author J. E. \ Straub , author M. Borkovec , \ and\ author B. J. \ Berne ,\ title title Calculation of dynamic friction on intramolecular degrees of freedom , \ @noop journal journal J Phys Chem \ volume 91 ,\ pages 4995--4998 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

    1987

  13. [21]

    Kiefer , author B

    author author H. Kiefer , author B. A. \ Dalton , \ and\ author R. R. \ Netz ,\ title title Diffusion and friction from force correlations , \ 10.1063/5.0261012 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 162 ( year 2025 ),\ 10.1063/5.0261012 NoStop

    doi

  14. [22]

    author author D. E. \ Makarov ,\ title title Interplay of non-markov and internal friction effects in the barrier crossing kinetics of unfolded proteins , \ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 138 ,\ pages 014102 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013

  15. [23]

    Elber , author D

    author author R. Elber , author D. E. \ Makarov , \ and\ author H. Orland ,\ @noop title Molecular kinetics in condensed phases: theory, simulation, and analysis \ ( publisher John Wiley & Sons ,\ year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020

  16. [24]

    Mostajabi Sarhangi \ and\ author D

    author author S. Mostajabi Sarhangi \ and\ author D. V. \ Matyushov ,\ title title Remarkable insensitivity of protein diffusion to protein charge , \ 10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c02062 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters \ volume 15 ,\ pages 9502--9508 ( year 2...

    doi

  17. [25]

    author author D. S. \ Dean , author I. T. \ Drummond , \ and\ author R. R. \ Horgan ,\ title title Effective transport properties for diffusion in random media , \ @noop journal journal J. Stat. Mech. \ volume 2007 ,\ pages P07013--P07013 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007

  18. [26]

    author author D. S. \ Dean \ and\ author V. D \'e mery ,\ title title Diffusion of active tracers in fluctuating fields , \ @noop journal journal J. Phys. Condens. Matter \ volume 23 ,\ pages 234114 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011

  19. [27]

    D \'e mery \ and\ author D

    author author V. D \'e mery \ and\ author D. S. \ Dean ,\ title title Perturbative path-integral study of active- and passive-tracer diffusion in fluctuating fields , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. \ volume 84 ,\ pages 011148 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011

  20. [28]

    Klafter \ and\ author I

    author author J. Klafter \ and\ author I. M. \ Sokolov ,\ @noop title First steps in random walks: From tools to applications \ ( publisher Oxford University Press, USA ,\ year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  21. [29]

    Metzler , author J

    author author R. Metzler , author J. H. \ Jeon , author A. G. \ Cherstvy , \ and\ author E. Barkai ,\ title title Anomalous diffusion models and their properties: non-stationarity, non-ergodicity, and ageing at the centenary of single particle tracking , \ 10.1039/c4cp03465a j...

    doi

  22. [30]

    Squaring this and using ^2(t)= (t) , we find x(t)^2 = a^2 @ @ _ i (t-t_i)+2a^2 @ @ _ i< j _i _j (t-t_i) (t-t_j)

    note We can write x(t)=a @ @ _ i _ i (t-t_i) , where _i= 1 are equiprobable Bernoulli random variables, (t) is the Heaviside function and the (ordered) t_i are the jump times. Squaring this and using ^2(t)= (t) , we find x(t)^2 = a^2 @ @ _ i (t-t_i)+2a^2 @ @ _ i< j _i _j (t-t_...

  23. [31]

    author author B. D. \ Hughes ,\ @noop title Random walks and random environments \ ( publisher Clarendon Press ,\ year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002

  24. [32]

    Hyeon \ and\ author D

    author author C. Hyeon \ and\ author D. Thirumalai ,\ title title Can energy landscape roughness of proteins and rna be measured by using mechanical unfolding experiments? \ 10.1073/pnas.1833310100 journal journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences \ volume 100 ,\...

    doi

  25. [33]

    author author A. N. \ Naganathan , author U. Doshi , \ and\ author V. Muñoz ,\ title title Protein folding kinetics: barrier effects in chemical and thermal denaturation experiments , \ 10.1021/ja0689740 journal journal J Am Chem Soc \ volume 129 ,\ pages 5673--82 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    doi

  26. [34]

    Lyons , author A

    author author A. Lyons , author A. Devi , author N. Q. \ Hoffer , \ and\ author M. T. \ Woodside ,\ title title Quantifying the properties of nonproductive attempts at thermally activated energy-barrier crossing through direct observation , \ 10.1103/PhysRevX.14.011017 journal...

    doi

  27. [35]

    author author B. S. \ Khatri , author K. Byrne , author M. Kawakami , author D. J. \ Brockwell , author D. A. \ Smith , author S. E. \ Radford , \ and\ author T. C. B. \ McLeish ,\ title title Internal friction of single polypeptide chains at high stretch , \ 10.1039/B716418C ...

    doi

  28. [36]

    Nevo , author V

    author author R. Nevo , author V. Brumfeld , author R. Kapon , author P. Hinterdorfer , \ and\ author Z. Reich ,\ title title Direct measurement of protein energy landscape roughness , \ 10.1038/sj.embor.7400403 journal journal EMBO Rep \ volume 6 ,\ pages 482--6 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    doi

  29. [37]

    Neupane , author F

    author author K. Neupane , author F. Wang , \ and\ author M. T. \ Woodside ,\ title title Direct measurement of sequence-dependent transition path times and conformational diffusion in dna duplex formation , \ 10.1073/pnas.1611602114 journal journal Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A \ ...

    doi

  30. [38]

    Hofmann , author F

    author author H. Hofmann , author F. Hillger , author S. H. \ Pfeil , author A. Hoffmann , author D. Streich , author D. Haenni , author D. Nettels , author E. A. \ Lipman , \ and\ author B. Schuler ,\ title title Single-molecule spectroscopy of protein folding in a chaperonin...

    doi

  31. [39]

    Wagner \ and\ author T

    author author C. Wagner \ and\ author T. Kiefhaber ,\ title title Intermediates can accelerate protein folding , \ 10.1073/pnas.96.12.6716 journal journal Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A \ volume 96 ,\ pages 6716--21 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    1999 doi

  32. [40]

    author author S. A. \ Waldauer , author O. Bakajin , author T. Ball , author Y. Chen , author S. J. \ Decamp , author M. Kopka , author M. Jäger , author V. R. \ Singh , author W. J. \ Wedemeyer , author S. Weiss , author S. Yao , \ and\ author L. J. \ Lapidus ,\ title title R...

    doi

  33. [41]

    Liu , author M

    author author F. Liu , author M. Nakaema , \ and\ author M. Gruebele ,\ title title The transition state transit time of ww domain folding is controlled by energy landscape roughness , \ 10.1063/1.3262489 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 131 ( year 2009...

    doi

  34. [42]

    Nettels , author I

    author author D. Nettels , author I. V. \ Gopich , author A. Hoffmann , \ and\ author B. Schuler ,\ title title Ultrafast dynamics of protein collapse from single-molecule photon statistics , \ 10.1073/pnas.0611093104 journal journal Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A \ volume 104 ,\ pa...

    doi

  35. [43]

    \ Li \ and\ author D

    author author P.-C. \ Li \ and\ author D. E. \ Makarov ,\ title title Theoretical studies of the mechanical unfolding of the muscle protein titin: Bridging the time-scale gap between simulation and experiment. \ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 119 ,\ pages 9260 (...

    2003

  36. [44]

    Stirnemann , author D

    author author G. Stirnemann , author D. Giganti , author J. M. \ Fernandez , \ and\ author B. J. \ Berne ,\ title title Elasticity, structure, and relaxation of extended proteins under force , \ 10.1073/pnas.1300596110 journal journal Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A \ volume 110 ,\ p...

    doi

  37. [45]

    author author A. P. \ Manuel , author J. Lambert , \ and\ author M. T. \ Woodside ,\ title title Reconstructing folding energy landscapes from splitting probability analysis of single-molecule trajectories , \ 10.1073/pnas.1419490112 journal journal Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A \ ...

    doi

  38. [46]

    author author D. J. \ Skinner \ and\ author J. Dunkel ,\ title title Estimating entropy production from waiting time distributions , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.198101 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 127 ,\ pages 198101 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi

  39. [47]

    author author N. G. v. \ Kampen ,\ @noop title Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry ,\ edition 3rd \ ed.,\ North-Holland personal library\ ( publisher Elsevier ,\ address Amsterdam ; Boston ,\ year 2007 )\ pp.\ pages xvi, 463 p. Stop

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.